7 minute read

Jan. 23 Foodie/Romance Jan

Next Article
Obituaries

Obituaries

DON’T MISS YOUR CHANCE TO DEFY GRAVITY

The untold true story of the Witches of Oz

SEPTEMBER 14–25 CHRYSLER HALL

TICKETS ON SALE NOW

BroadwayInNorfolk.com Groups 15+ 757.664.6418 INTERNATIONAL

continued from page 5 he wanted to enhance the deal and to negotiate limitations on Iran’s other disruptive actions, but he made clear that his priority was first to get back into the deal.

“If Iran returns to strict compliance with the nuclear deal, the United States would rejoin the agreement as a starting point for follow-on negotiations,” he said in a September 2020 op-ed on CNN. “With our allies, we will work to strengthen and extend the nuclear deal’s provisions, while also addressing other issues of concern.”

One of Antony Blinken’s first acts as Biden’s new secretary of state in February 2021 was to join the JCPOA’s three European partners in telling Iran that the United States was ready to come back to the negotiating table. “If Iran comes back into strict compliance with its commitments under the JCPOA, the United States will do the same and is prepared to engage in discussions with Iran toward that end,” Blinken said.

What’s in the latest version of the deal?

According to reports, Iran will allow inspectors in to verify that it is returning to the original 2015 restrictions—an involved process that could take months, as inspectors observe the dismantling of enrichment systems that have been enhanced to greater levels than before 2015. The United States will likely remove sanctions targeting Iran’s nuclear sector, its oil exports, and its banks.

The deal will be less effective, insiders say, because Iran has advanced its enrichment capability to the point that even with a deal in place, it is likely to never be more than six months away from a bomb, half the period under the old deal. Additionally, the “sunsets”—the expirations of enrichment limitations due in 2026 and 2031—loom closer now.

Getting back into the deal will open Iran’s oil exports to legitimate markets; the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a think tank leading Iran criticism in Washington, estimates the income will reach $1 trillion by 2030.

If Biden wants back in— what’s holding it up?

Representatives from all of the countries party to the deal, plus the United States (and the European Union, which has participated as a bloc in negotiations but is not signed on as a bloc), have been negotiating a U.S. reentry and new terms since April 2021.

While President Obama negotiated a deal with officials who were seen as relative moderates for Iran, the country elected a hard-line president, Ebrahim Raisi, shortly after Biden took office. Raisi was involved in crimes against humanity in the late 1980s and chose for his Cabinet two men implicated in the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people.

Whereas Obama’s secretary of state, John Kerry, was famously photographed sharing jokes with his Iranian counterpart, Javad Zarif, Iranian officials now refuse to even be in the same room with American ones, which has resulted in intermediaries shuttling between conference rooms in the Palais Coburg hotel and slowed down the process considerably.

More importantly, Iran has asked for three concessions Biden has refused to agree to. One is that Biden removes what Iran considers to be the most noxious of Trump’s new sanctions: placing the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps on the U.S.-designated terrorist list. Biden,

“They have more stuff installed. They have less oversight. They’ve got a bigger stockpile of 60% enriched uranium.”

INTERNATIONAL

who is close to families who have lost soldiers to IRGC-backed attacks in Iraq, has been adamant in refusing. Israeli officials, including Defense Minister Benny Gantz, a national security adviser and the head of Mossad have been in Washington, making their case against some of the rumored concessions, particularly the delisting of the IRGC.

Iran also wants the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, to end an investigation into undeclared nuclear material that its inspectors uncovered in 2019. And Iran additionally wants a guarantee that future administrations will not renege on the deal, as Trump did. Western negotiators have claimed that Iran appears to have given up on the first two demands.

But the American negotiators have said they cannot guarantee Iran that a future president would not walk out of the deal.

What are U.S. lawmakers saying this time?

There is one thing all parties agree on: The deal will be less effective this time around.

Supporters of reentry say that some of the harm caused by Trump’s withdrawal is irreparable, while deal opponents say the flaws were built into the original deal.

Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat who has been outspoken in backing reentry, acknowledged in a Time magazine op-ed in February that any renewed deal would fall short of the restrictions achieved under Obama.

“This new deal may not look the same as Obama’s deal due to all the ground we lost during Trump’s presidency,” Murphy wrote. “But an agreement by Iran to significantly expand its breakout time and allow all the inspections to resume would make the world a safer place.”

A top Democratic congressional staffer who is regularly briefed on the administration’s Iran planning recalled former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s appearance in 2012 at the United Nations’ General Assembly meeting. Netanyahu was mocked for bringing a poster with the image of a cartoon bomb on it, meant to represent Iran’s nuclear program.

“Bibi’s little bomb cartoon is actually a reality,” said the staffer, who asked for anonymity to speak candidly. “Like literally, it was a joke back then. But because of Bibi and Trump’s policies, that f—ing cartoon is real. You’re literally presented with almost a binary choice, which is accept an imperfect deal that will set them back now, or do nothing and go down the line to war.”

“They have more stuff installed,” the staffer added. “They have less oversight. They’ve got a bigger stockpile of 60% enriched uranium than they had during the JCPOA or before the JCPOA even.”

What are some other wild cards getting in the way?

Congress has the right to review the deal, but likely lacks the veto-proof majority to kill it—the same scenario as in 2015, when Obama stymied Congress’ vote against the deal. JCPOA opponents, including in the pro-Israel community, are planning a full court press against it this time around as well, and if Republicans retake at least one of the chambers of Congress in November, they could slow the implementation of the deal.

But there are also international trends that could prompt cold American feet.

Iran reportedly is assisting Russia in its war against Ukraine by supplying it with weaponized drones and teaching it how to evade U.S. sanctions. Biden’s foreign policy priority is crippling Russia, and bringing Iran back into the international community could hinder that aim.

Another setback could come in the form of open conflict between Iran and U.S. allies. Anti-Iranian tensions have exploded into violence in Iraq, and Israel last month faced down an Iran ally, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, in the Gaza Strip.

Iran also has not stopped its malign activity, including reportedly in the United States, where a dissident has faced assassination attempts and an assailant stabbed author Salman Rushdie, who remains subject to a death sentence Iran imposed in 1989.

Local Relationships Matter

MEET: Stephen Merritt, CPA & Barbara Merritt, CPA

“We are passionate about small businesses in our area and want to see them succeed. To that end we strive to be very good at what we do so our services help them succeed. We are very passionate about using local businesses. In fact we use our clients as vendors whenever possible. Developing relationships locally is very important and it helps the local economy grow. We also believe that local businesses provide better service because they care.”

“We used two national providers before them and there is no comparison. Our experience with Payday has been “ far more positive. A live person answers the phone....no prompts. You talk to a human! They are always helpful, helpful, helpful, with prompt responses to information requests. The customer service is always easily accessible and responsive. We know we can call them on behalf of our clients and get the information we need quickly, a big time saver for us. In fact, we strongly recommend Payday to our clients for their payroll needs.” “ Our client relationships are anything but transactional. We are long-term partners, dedicated to the success of our clients, and most importantly, their people.

757-523-0605

paydaypayroll.com

Payroll Benefits HR

PD-ad-three-eighths-V-color-Jewish News-111320.indd 9 11/13/20 2:56 PM

This article is from: