mini portfolio

Page 1

ALANA ARMSTRONG LEED AP, NCIDQ

SEEKING Local, International or District Scale Real Estate Development Opportunities Retail and Commercial or Mixed- use Project Types Feasibility and Market Analysis, Planning or Design + Construction Management EDUCATION Grad Certificate in Real Estate Development, Portland State University, ongoing M. Architecture, University of Oregon, 2009-2011 Franco Americain Studio, L’Ecole d’Architecture La Villette (Paris), 2003-2004 B.S. Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1999-2004

Atlanta, Georgia Paris, France Portland, Oregon Portland, Oregon

PROFESSIONAL Real Estate Design Scope Consultant [Real Estate Development], current Sustainable Building Consultant [Real Estate Development], Fall 2010 Sustainable Building Coordinator [Real Estate Development], Summer 2010 Assistant Operations/Assistant Project Manager/Estimator, 6/2009 - 6/2010 Architectural Designer/Project Architect/Interior Designer, 9/2004 - 8/2008 Architectural or Design Internships, Summers 2001 - 2004

Williams & Dame Development - Portland, Oregon Atlantic Investors - Portland, Oregon Atlantic Investors - Panama City, Panama Glen / Mar Construction - Portland, Oregon Collins Cooper Carusi Architects - Atlanta, Georgia Various - Atlanta, Georgia

SKILLSET Design, Project, and Construction Management Client Relations and Presentations Integrated Sustainable Design & Systems Thinking - LEED Gold and Silver Google Earth & ArcGIS Adobe CS Suite/Wordpress & Blogging BIM software (Archicad)/ Sketchup/ CAD

Contact: alanae@gmail.com - 404.822.8816 - http://www.linkedin.com/in/alanaarmstrong

to continue sustainable conversation ideas tomeans continue thetheconversation


GRESHAM YARDS

Mixed Use Multifamily Courtyard Housing Winter 2010. Micro-Ecologies Studio Smart building systems creates habitat and supports urban agriculture Project Brief Mixed use multi-family residential development in downtown Gresham. Connections are provided rail commuter transit, pedestrian cooridors, community spaces through a plaza market , on-site brewery, and courtyard gardens. Aspects of solar exposure and water collection and flow were considered to supply areas of gardening for residents while sustaining habitat on-site through building supported measures, both built and living systems.

street perspective

courtyard perspective

Natural Riparian Habitat provide habitat

espalier. apples grapes mutualism

mutualism hedgerows greywater collection rainwater collection raised planter beds greywater wetlands

rainwater cistern

holistic development thinking


BUILDING SYSTEMS: Design supports Placemaking & Habitat

facade screen system supports habitat

section through habitat corridors: courtyard to constructed wetland


BIOCLIMATIC DESIGN & CONSULTING Sustainable Tropical Design & Passive Design for hot-humid Panama Fall 2010. Consulting for Kalu Yala Natural Design Guidelines and Vision Planning of Base Camp

prepared by Alana Armstrong 09.15.2010 ! ! The following report compiles research and analysis gathered on building systems during the Summer of 2010 to establish a baseline of design guidelines for Kalu Yala. All relevant sustainable building systems and opportunities are analyzed per current presence in Panama, Kalu Yala field work and site analysis, evaluation of optimal solutions whether for social, environmental, economical, and human comfort, and current observation of Panamanian labor markets and existing quality of craft. ! The main goal is to reiterate principles of sustainable building are valuable given the practicality and economic feasibility. Many of the basic principles applicable to Kalu Yala are based on centuries of design which many modern architects and engineers do not operate or design by today: ! ! ! !

1. 2. 3. 4.

!

Many of these design principles can be achieved through the following strategies:

! !

! ! !

1. Bioclimatic response & Passive Design Strategies: ! - Compiling site analysis - Site optimization - Orientation (solar & wind) - Human comfort optimization 2. Site Specific Resource Management - Documenting site specific building resources"for infrastructure 3. Sustainable Building Systems Engineering ! -Ideal considering stock, cost, value and payback. 4. Sourcing experience and craft or training the proper skillset for labor practices

!

Main recommendations to Kalu Yala are:

! ! ! ! !

1. To evaluate and identify optimal materials and conduct a feasibility study documenting cost and implementation 2. To continue to expand on this baseline of design guidelines to further outline and develop the holistic design of Kalu Yala within all aspects: land planning, resource management, infrastructure, transit, urbanism, architecture, agriculture, and tourism. [see Exhibit A]

!

Optimize Site Potential Optimize Energy Use Enhance Indoor Environmental Quality (Human comfort) Optimize Operational and Maintenance practices

! Note: This report has been assembled with “duty of care” but is structured to provide a baseline of design direction to further assess site-specific resources and a design response both for urban studies, land planning and architecture. This report does not detail nor direct the fundamental aspects of structural integrity with proper cladding and wall cavity detailing for waterproofing, insulation, or moisture management which are essential to building in the tropics. Further research must be implemented within these areas of structure, insulation and mechanical systems for proper building enclosures in Panama.!

TABLE OF CONTENTS Site Analysis A. Location B. Site History C. Site Context 1. Topography/Geotechnical/Soil profiles 2. Drainage/Watersheds 3. Natural Resources to harvest/preserve 4. Climate/Weather/Wind/Solar Paths! 5. Natural Boundaries 6. Natural Vegetation/Microclimates 7. Features/Views! 8. Existing Access/Infrastructure II. Building Design Guidelines A. Design Objectives: Vision & Principals B. Sustainability Principles 1. Overall Bioclimatic Design Strategies 2. Specific Passive Design Strategies 3. Site Specific Resource Management for Building Practices 4. Storm water Management for Building Practices 5. Sustainable Construction Systems Engineering C. Site Infrastructure Construction 1. Stormwater Management 2. Roads 3. Utilities 4. Sanitation/Sewer D. Building Typology 1. Use 2. Building Construction Typology 3. Specifics E. Optimal Construction Systems 1. Bamboo 2. Native Hardwoods 3. Earthbuilding a) Adobe b) Cob c) Pise de Terre/Rammed Earth d) Quincha e) Earthbag 4. Stone 5. Palmas & Thatch F. Ideal Construction Details for the tropics 1. Floor 2. Wall 3. Ceiling G. Ideal Finishes H. Design Specifications III. Appendix IV. Works Cited I.



PROJECT SCOPE DEVELOPMENT Site Planning/Project Development/Development Costs Summer 2011. Contracting for Williams & Dame Development Project Coordination/Program Analysis/Proforma


DESIGN CONCEPT & DEVELOPMENT

TYPICAL TOWER FLOOR OF PROTOTYPE CONSIDERED

This brand hotel is the well established in Europe, Asia and Africa. Currently, in the United States, only 1 built brand exists for this hotel corporation with 1 other location on the design boards. To initiate the design schematics, the typical floor plan layout was considered as a conceptual start but formulated to fit the site area. Design and development analysis continued into program calculations and evaluations based on an 80% ratio of the original prototype and FAR transfer allowed for the Los Angeles site proposal. The podium design was driven by site context and parking allowance considering the courtyard approach. Building approach and relating functions drove the program layout within the podium. Napkin Sketch Program Run by Floor 4-18 = 13,000 GR 3 = 18,000 GR + 5k Pool/Fitness 2 = 25,000 Meeting 1 = 25,000 Lobby/Restaurant/BOH P1 = 25,000 Parking/BOH P2 = 25,000 Parking -------------------------------------------------- 313,000 GSF

TOWER ADJUSTED TO SITE DIMENSIONS


FAR Analysis based on prototype considering IDS site

Program Analysis based on 80% reduction

MOA GSF

IBS GSF

Public Space Summary

61,046

48,837

BOH Summary with exclusions (MEP)

21,106

16,885

Public & BOH Circulation with exclusions

20,441

16,353

Guestroom Floors with exclusions

246,269

197,015

Total GSF of Program

365,029

279,090

SF for FAR exclusions

6,481

5,185

2%

2%

348,862

279,090

MOA Program GSF

LA Program GSF

LA Total GSF

23,436 21,698

17,358

13,020 21,698

26,538

21,230

26,538

26,197

20,958

26,197

FAR exclusions percentage GSF of program with exclusions

Initial Program Analysis based on prototype considering IDS site

Penthouse Floor

Site Constraints

13 4-Module Concierge Lounge 1,624

(2) Mod Suite Typ Floors: 25 Guestrms (2 Jr Stes, 9 K, 14 QQ) Third Floor Pool/WP/Toilets/Pool Mech/Pool Stor. 4,216 Exercise 1,716 Spa & Spa Storage 3,689 Dirty Linen 255 Clean Linen/Housekeeping 1,892 Junior Ballroom 4,361 2, 4 Prefunction 1,868) 2, 4 Meeting Rooms 2,397 2, 4 Board Rooms/PDRs 830 Public Restrooms 474

Second Floor

Main Ballroom 10,180 Prefunction (7,467 Meeting Rooms (3,205 Board Rooms/PDRs (1,071 Public Restrooms (2,183 2 Employee Lockers & Dining 2,432

Ground Floor

Entry Lobby/Vestibule 4,399 Main Lobby (and Front Desk) 5,295 Bar/Restaurant 5,606 Sundries 109 Coats 356 Public Restrooms (474) Front OfďŹ ce (PBX/Work/Res./G.S. Mgr 691 Administration/BOH 3,733 Human Resources 507 Luggage Storage 392 Kitchen/Food Storage 3,823 Maintenance/Engineering 812

26,250



PLANNING METHODS & METRICS

Research conducted for PSU: Portland’s Pilot Program of Ecodistricts Fall 2010. Environmental Land Planning Methods Methodology and Measurement of Performance for Sustainable District Planning

ABSTRACT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A methodology proposed for Materials Management, one of the nine performance areas of an Ecodistrict. Both waste streams are considered: construction materials waste and post-occupancy consumer waste. This next step for implementation of Ecodistricts programs builds upon current studies published on identified goals and targets and proposes applied strategies to track progress and assess initial goals.

Portland Oregon Sustainability Institute (PoSI) characterizes the EcoDistricts Initiative as, “a comprehensive strategy to accelerate sustainable development at the neighborhood scale by integrating building and infrastructure projects with community and individual action.” A collective undertaking, currently led by PoSI, is formulating the ideas, qualities, and workings of an EcoDistrict. PoSI has identified nine performance areas within an EcoDistrict: equitable development, placemaking, social cohesion, air quality and carbon, energy, access and mobility, water, habitat and ecosystem function, and materials management. Each of these performance areas are to be assessed individually but work together in unison within the district. POSI’s current action plan has identified goals and targets within each of these areas. Currently underway, the next step is to create applied strategies to later track progress and assess initial goals while moving towards launching the EcoDistrict Pilot Programs.

Collection of data Establish baseline conditions Interventions applied Metrics via data sources Analysis applied

LITERATURE REVIEW & INTERVIEWS

Portland Sustainability Institute Reports via Oregon DEQ Reports via EPA Waste NAHB Research Center Biocycle Shawn Wood, City of Portland Oregon Metro

For this study, the research team identified one of the nine performance areas: materials management, where metrics were the least developed. Materials management includes materials and waste associated with a building’s life cycle, including initial construction, postoccupancy waste, and improvements or demolition. This report proposes suggested methods to apply metrics with supporting data sources, and in some cases, offers recommendations which support currently identified goals and targets.

The methodology proposed for materials management is designed for integration within other performance areas in terms of suggested strategies with limited recommendations, data collection, and analysis applied, despite this report only considering one performance area. The research questions identified are based on a mixture of literature reviews, interviews, current industry or regulating practices, and existing supporting infrastructure to further PoSI’s objectives to establish EcoDistricts. The district scale, illustrated by the EcoDistrict idea, guides all of the methods and strategies proposed in this report. The district scale allows for data collection at multiple scales, whether blocks, lots, or households with supporting strategies while reflecting unique characteristics present to each district. While specific strategies will vary district to district based on various factors such as size, scale, and mix of land-use and resources, the methodologies suggested within this report are general enough to remain broadly applicable to all current EcoDistrict Pilot Programs.

graphic courtesy of Mithun


Figure 1: EcoDistrict Materials Management Flow Blue arrows represent materials entering the district. Green category boxes represent various pathways materials might travel while in the district. Gold arrows show desirable means by which materials might be reclaimed to reduce resource extraction. The farthest right column represents the general process by which materials exit the district or is reclaimed or recovered. Figures represent waste flows from the Portland Metro area, displaying waste flows "as is" (Office of Sustainable Development).

Figure 2: EcoDistrict Construction Waste Flow Blue arrows represent building waste entering the EcoDistrict. Green category boxes represent various pathways building waste might take. Gold arrows show desirable means by which construction waste might be reclaimed to reduce resource demand, embodied energy, and GHG. The farthest right column represents the general process by which building materials exits the district or is reclaimed. Red exit processes are generally undesirable, while green exit processes and gold reclamation processes are in line with EcoDistrict Goals and inform recommended strategies.


DESIGN PRACTICE

Collins Cooper Carusi Architects 2006-2007. Summit Family YMCA (Metro Atlanta YMCA) Newnan, Georgia Interior Architecture Client Presentation 3D Rendering Conceptualization with Project Renderer Interior Architecture Documents Interiors Palette: Color selection/Materials coordination Interior Construction Administration & Submittal Review LEED correspondence

DESIGN CONCEPTS/ APPLICATION

exterior approach

ceilings

porcelain tile

mdf wall panels reception desk

walk off mat

storefront glazing

LOBBY PALETTE

Inspirational concept images


Pre-Teens/ Teens/ Babysitting

walk off tile

Gym/Running

Administration/ Office

full paint palette

locker room finishes

“wave” pool tile

Wellness

cedar siding

NATATORIUM/ LOCKER ROOMS PALETTE

YMCA PROGRAM PALETTE


DESIGN CONCEPTS/ APPLICATION

View at Main Entrance by 3D Project Renderer

View at bottom of Stairs by 3D Project Renderer

Interior Lobby Views


MATERIAL COORDINATION/ APPLICATION

Toddlers Pre-teens/Teens Lobby

Gym

Natatorium Lockers

First Floor Finish Plan

Admin

lobby/ teen center

Aerobics

Running Track Wellness

Natatorium Below

Second Floor Finish Plan

natatorium


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.