USLAW Magazine - Winter 2021/2022

Page 24

20

WINTER 2021/2022 USLAW MAGAZINE U S L A W

A Product Recall Case Study

A Manufacturer’s Frozen Food Recall Has a Potentially Chilling Effect on Sales By Maria Geyer, CPA

As forensic accountants, clients frequently ask MDD to quantify losses stemming from a variety of product recall matters. To date, we have worked in sectors as varied as farming, power generation, construction, transportation, cosmetics, food and beverage and others. MDD assisted in one such matter when we were retained to review and quantify costs for a frozen foods manufacturer that had to recall a critical raw ingredient. The $2.5 million insurance claim included the cost of the lost ingredient, lost sales value of finished goods inventory, sales losses due to the inability to fill orders, and customer chargebacks. As part of the review, MDD examined the following issues: •

Was the claim for the loss of raw ingredients a duplication with other areas of the claim?

Were the claimed lost finished goods quantities reasonable?

Did the manufacturer have a basis for claiming lost finished goods at sales value and sales losses from not being able to fill orders?

Were the customer chargebacks adequately supported?

HOW WE HELPED Even though the manufacturer claimed a significant loss from its raw ingredient purchases, MDD confirmed the specific recalled batches and determined that only a portion of these ingredients were

MDD Forensic Accountants

involved in the recall. We also concluded that the ingredients had been consumed as part of the manufacturing process and then converted to finished goods. As such, the manufacturer had no basis for this aspect of the claim because it would have been a duplication with the claimed finished goods and customer chargebacks. MDD used various production and shipment documentation to analyze and confirm the finished goods cases produced, including those cases that were either shipped to external warehouses/customers or still in stock at the plant. After finishing our analysis, we determined that the claimed on-hand quantities were reasonable, both at the plant and at the external warehouses. The manufacturer claimed the warehouse inventory quantities at sales value. We also analyzed purchase orders and sales invoices supporting cut orders (reduction in quantities ordered due to occurrence). While the cut orders were reasonably supported, we determined that they posed a potential duplication issue with the claim of the finished goods since the manufacturer would have filled the cut orders with the same finished goods being claimed elsewhere. Although the manufacturer presented the claim for lost inventory and cut orders at sales value, the combined sales loss could not exceed the total sales value lost for the same products. This meant that MDD needed to perform an analysis to verify the total sales loss sustained from the affected products.

Our review confirmed lost sales in the month after the recall and a sales makeup over the subsequent two months. In other words, the sales records supported that although there was an impact on sales immediately following the recall, the company recovered some of the sales loss by increasing shipments over the next two months. We concluded there was an overall net sales loss for the affected products over these three months. MDD then limited the claimed loss of finished goods and orders so they would not exceed the overall net sales value lost according to the sales records. Finally, the manufacturer claimed losses due to their customers charging them for the products they had to dispose of because of the recall. MDD analyzed supporting documentation and held back charges with no invoice or insufficient detail/backup, duplications, and amounts for the non-recalled product. These costs also included recall and administrative fees, and we segregated those fees not supported by supplier agreement and vendor recall policies. Maria Geyer is a CPA and partner in the New York office of MDD Forensic Accountants. She has been retained as an expert witness in accounting and damage valuation, including admission as an expert witness in State court. To contact Maria, please email her at mgeyer@mdd.com.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Spotlight on Corporate Partners

8min
pages 59-63

USLAW NETWORK SourceBook

6min
pages 56-58

diversity, equity and inclusion

3min
page 51

pro bono Spotlight

3min
page 52

By Clint Townson, Ph.D. • IMS Consulting & Expert Services

7min
pages 38-39

By Doug Marshall • Marshall Investigative Group, Inc

8min
pages 40-43

firms on the move

7min
pages 46-47

faces of uslaw

5min
pages 44-45

By Dr. Jan Tibor Lelley, LL.M. and Diana Ruth Bruch • BUSE

7min
pages 30-31

By Karen Painter Randall and Steven Kroll • Connell Foley LLP

8min
pages 36-37

By Erin Nathan • Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman PLC

6min
pages 34-35

By Nicholas Mahoney, P.E., CFEI, CVFI • S-E-A

7min
pages 32-33

By Brad Cantwell • Arcadia Settlements Group

2min
page 25

By Joshua W. Praw • Murchison & Cumming LLP

7min
pages 26-27

By Maria Geyer, CPA • MDD Forensic Accountants

3min
page 24

By Jessica L. Dark and Jeffrey C. Hendrickson Pierce Couch Hendrickson Baysinger & Green, L.L.P

6min
pages 28-29

By John Pion and Stephanie Hersperger Pion, Nerone, Girman, Winslow & Smith, P.C

7min
pages 16-17

By Darren P. Grady • SmithAmundsen

7min
pages 22-23

By Jared Cohane • Hinckley Allen

7min
pages 6-9

By Melisa C. Zwilling and Brett Adair • Carr Allison

8min
pages 20-21

By Tom Cronmiller, Sanjeev Devabhakthuni, and Matthew Paris Barclay Damon LLP

6min
pages 18-19

By Noel D. Humphreys • Connell Foley LLP

6min
pages 10-11

By Robert Tugander • Rivkin Radler LLP

7min
pages 12-13

By Brian McGraw • Middleton Reutlinger

8min
pages 14-15
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.