USQ Law Society Law Review Winter Edition 2021

Page 51

USQ Law Society Law Review

Fatema Nazari

Winter 2021

there is more to adjudication than the mere mechanical application of established legal principles to uncontroversial fact-finding. For these scholars, the rules which legal formalism treats as uncontroversial, essentially conceals contentious moral and political choices. Realists also deem it uncertain whether the law and the facts recognized in the judge's reasonings are the actual reasons of the decision.6

III

REALISM’S COMMON THEMES:7

Influences of authority and economics Realists believe that the common law principles protect the commercial and economic interests of most powerful figures of the society. Courts uphold the interests of the members in power, behind the judgement of what is right.

A doubt of the judicial technique of apparent deduction of legal conclusions from the rules of law The realists believe that law is not a set of rules that is clear, consistent, and complete as formalists claimed. Relatively, the law is packed with ambiguities, vague terms, contradictions, and incompatible rules of interpretation. Resultantly, there is usually no correct answer unique to any hard case which judges decide.8

Law as an instrument for society’s welfare Realism maintains that the law does and should serve social ends.9 Judges do take considerations of public policy and fairness into account to enhance society’s welfare.

A pragmatic approach for sustainable results Realists believe that law should be viewed scientifically, as an empirical science to resolve legal disputes. Judges must survey competing interests, substitute approaches and their consequences when they hand down opinions.10 It mandates to cite that Realists do not propose that judges disregard the rule of law. Rather, they uphold that the role of the rule of law is minimized in the process of their decisionmaking.11 Nonetheless, legal realism is not a unified school of thought, but it generally analyses the motives that provoke the behaviours of judges.

6

Glendon Schubert, ‘Judicial Attitudes and Voting Behaviour: The 1961 Term of the United States Supreme Court’ (1963) 28 Law and Contemporary Problems 100, 100. 7 Singer (n 4) 502. 8 Brian Leiter, ‘Rethinking Legal Realism: Toward a Naturalized Jurisprudence’ (1997) 76 Texas Law Review 267, 301. 9 Singer (n 4) 515. 10 Ibid 502. 11 Capurso (n 4) 13.

46


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

USQ LAW SOCIETY LAW REVIEW

2min
pages 1-3

INDIGENOUS SENTENCING COURTS IN AUSTRALIA: A THERAPEUTIC JURISPRUDENTIAL MODEL OR A CATEGORY OF THEIR OWN?

13min
pages 123-129

THERAPEUTIC JURISPRUDENCE SEEKS TO ACHIEVE A CULTURAL AND POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE LAW. HOW DO THE INDIGENOUS SENTENCING COURTS IN AUSTRALIA CONTRIBUTE TO THAT AIM?

15min
pages 115-121

INDIGENOUS SENTENCING COURTS: ‘WHO WILL I BELONG TO NEXT, WHAT LAWS WILL THEY MAKE FOR ME NOW?’

16min
pages 107-113

INDIGENOUS SENTENCING COURTS ENLARGE THE DISCRETION OF JUDGES, LAWYERS AND THERAPISTS. WHY (OR WHY NOT) IS SUCH A DISCRETION BENEFICIAL TO AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY?

17min
pages 99-106

THE IMPACT OF SETTLER SOVEREIGNTY ON INDIGENOUS CUSTOMARY LAW AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE DISPOSSESSION OF INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS

14min
pages 91-97

STUCK BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE: RECOGNIZING INDIGENOUS LAND CLAIMS IN A WESTERN LEGAL SYSTEM.

15min
pages 83-89

YOUTH BOOT CAMPS A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION: A PUNITIVE MEASURE OF AN OPPORTUNITY TO AVOID JUVENILE CRIMINAL RECORDS?

53min
pages 59-82

LEGAL REALISM’S ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL BEHAVIOUR AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO JURISPRUDENCE

13min
pages 51-57

INDIVIDUALS HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BUT CAN JUDGES ALSO CONSIDER NATURAL RIGHTS?

14min
pages 45-50

DEMOCRATIC PEACE THEORY

17min
pages 37-43

THE CARRY OVER EFFECT OF BRENTON TARRANT ON AUSTRALIAN ANTITERRORISM LEGISLATION.

11min
pages 31-36

SHOULD AUSTRALIA FOLLOW THE BRITISH MODEL AND ADMIT BAD CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS SET OUT IN SECTIONS 98-113 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 (UK)?*

20min
pages 21-29

NATIONHOOD POWER & INTERGOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITIES: WHERE DOES THE POWER VEST*

24min
pages 9-20

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF’S ADDRESS

1min
page 8

LAW REVIEW VICE PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS

1min
page 7

FEMINIST APPROACHES TO SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY

17min
pages 161-168

CONSTRUCTION DELAYS, EOT’S, TIME BARS, LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND THE SUPERINTENDENT’S OBLIGATIONS – UNDERSTANDING THE IMPLICATIONS OF DELAYS CAUSED BY THE PRINCIPAL AND THE OPERATION OF THE ‘PREVENTION PRINCIPLE’

19min
pages 183-195

IS FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY ENACTING CHANGE OR IS IT SIMPLY AN EXPLANATION OF THE ROLE THAT LAW HAS PLAYED IN THE SUBORDINATION OF WOMEN?

20min
pages 153-160

BUKTON V TOUNESENDE: HOW MODERN CONTRACT LAW BEGAN ON THE HUMBER

6min
pages 169-172

SMART CONTRACTS – THE FUTURE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS, OR MERE HYPE?

18min
pages 173-182

INDIGENOUS SENTENCING COURTS: HOW ENLARGED DISCRETION BY JUDGES, LAWYERS AND THERAPISTS CAN BENEFIT AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY

15min
pages 131-138

BARRIERS TO WOMEN IN LAW

12min
pages 145-152

HOW DID THE MARRIED STATE LEAVE A WOMAN VULNERABLE UNDER ENGLISH LAW?

10min
pages 139-144
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.