27
Design-Build Action towards Participatory Architecture In the current highly professionalized and specialized architectural design and construction industry, clients, occupants, architects and contractors have grown increasingly distant from the design and construction processes. The people who should be the most intimately involved in the production and use of architecture find it difficult to realize their ideas in architecture during the design and construction processes. As design and fabrication becomes more mechanized and computerized, producers and users of architecture may face increasing feelings of alienation in their own environment. Apathy or abdication of responsibility by some professionals leaves the issue of the absence of tactile human input into architecture unexamined. To combat this, people should involve themselves directly in the design and construction process. We can recover the sense of citizen-ownership of architecture by promoting flexible self-build construction systems. Architecture made using these systems can also produce a sense of collective ownership of and responsibility for buildings. By creating opportunities for input from members of the community, we can move toward a new architecture of empathy. At the same time, we can and should make use of the latest technological developments to aid in the production of empathic architecture. In particular, by making use of precise digital design and computerized fabrication tools, we can create flexible, intuitive systems that allow people with limited skills and experience to engage in the design process. In this way, we can realize concrete architecture from subjective feelings. “Veneer House� projects are the trials to achieve these goals.
1
CONTENTS STORY
4
APPROACH
10
TECHNIQUE
18
PROJECTS
21
ESSAY
107
AWARDS
121
PROFILE
123
2
3
STORY
4
WE asked ourselves W H AT W E C A N D O A N D W H AT S H O U L D B E D O N E
䎃ח饯ֹ匌傈劤㣐ꩍ拄כծךך侧ⴓג׃ח㢳ֻך㼣ְㄏծ凃׃ծ ג׃遳㤽ְծ⫊ֽאծַכ 濼ًتךוקְז٦➂آղך䗰ח婍׃תְֹג׃կ ׁחꩍ拄䖓ך植㖑כדծ耵➂װ项勞ծꅾ堣ָ♶駈 ׃ծ㠨徦涸ז朐屣ַך䗁莆הֿךֶזכꤹְ׃麣חך䠬ׄ׃תկ 䩛Ⰵח项勞⢪גծ傍ֻ٥㸜ֻ٥知⽃דسٕؽؿٕإח䒉鏣ֹד倜ְ׃圓岀կ 㣐㷕ד䒉眠侄ִ㼭卌 ⽆➂ךה㷕欰ָծ荈ⴓהֹֿדח垷稊׃ծ㹋遤ָךג׃չصץ،أؐعպך㨣׃דתկ
5
Veneer House - STORY -
WE DEVELOPED A SELF-BUILD ARCHITECTURE SYSTEM
岣湡כך׃ծصץ،さ匢կ דֿו㸜⣣ד䩛ֻׅװⰅחծ ֻזָגְד㼄岀ָ姻然կ 勞俱䓼䏝㸜 㹀גְג׃ծ䒉眠项勞ג׃הꬊ䌢⮚ח猕ׅדկ ֲִךծ啾卌ך⠄勞勞俱דךְג׃הծ橆㞮׃ׁװח ְկ ֲֿصץ׃،さ匢ֶֹג׃زحַ֮ؕׄծ 暴婊ז䪮遭װ䊨Ⱗ⢪ⵃח׆欽罏荈ָ穈甧 גծ䒉眠暟䒉הֿג〳腉ָךׅחչصك،أؐعպ ׅדկ
6
WE BELIEVE IN BRINGING ARCHITECTURE CLOSER
ת׃ג׃ꟼ⤘ָ⛣ꨄךה➂ׅⵃ欽הծ䒉眠׃⻉ⴓ噟׃涪麦חծ䒉眠䪮遭ָ넝䏝כד➿植 կׅת䙼חֲ״ ֻծזדַלְ׃嚂כהֿ⡲䒉暟ךⴓ荈דⴓծ荈׃ַ׃ ׅ㼎ח䒉暟דהֲֿׅ կׅתת䓼䠥滠 կהַֿⴓגׄ鸐أؐع،صץ ծכ ״חהֿ⡲ג׃⸂⼿דזך؍ذصُى؝䒉暟ךאהמ ծװְ䙼ׅ㼎חծ㕼㖑ֿ⠗䪫ָ饯ך⻉俑װ濼䜋ֹג׃剣ךծ㖑㚖ג ֿת䙼ְָ䓼ׅ㼎ח؍ذصُى؝ կה גהח➂ךֻ䒉眠ָ㢳 կזחպה׀ⴓչ荈 ׄ䠬〳腉䚍זֹ㣐ח♧זךأؐع،صץכ猘 կׅתְג
7
8
9
APPROACH ֲַկ簭騃ꨄך➂ה➂䒉眠ծה➂ծ׃ֲו أؐع،صץֹג׃罋ִծ涪חזծ猘ג׃㼎חֿ կׅת׃➜稱ח♴⟃سحاًך
10
Accessibility صץ،ךأؐع㛇劤כծ㼔濼陎װ暴婊ז䪮遭ָחֲ״ךٕرٌٓفגֻז铩ָ穈甧ג知⽃ז ➬穈կ
さ匢⚅כ歲⚥ד䩛Ⰵח项勞֮דծ ؕرךزح٦ִׁة鷏לծ דֿו鿇勞欰欵ָהֿׅ〳腉ד ׅկ 妜ָ➂ְ׃妜ְ׃㜥ד欰欵ֹדկ תא䬿挿㘗ך欰欵٥⣘窌ֻזכדծⴓ侔㘗ח㾜ֹד䒉眠ׅדկ
11
Veneer House - APPROACH -
WORKSHOP կׅת֮חהֿׅחךז魦鵚䒉眠ג״חيذأءךسٕؽؿٕإծכ溪냯ךأؐع،صץ կفحّءؙٙ٦ך铡僇欽ְ欽遤ֲծ垷㘗瘝ג׃㼎ח➂ך㖑㚖װ➂ꟼג׃ה䒉鏣銲㆞ ח㹋ꥷ կفحّءؙٙ٦ך㘗زٝك؎ךֲג׃⡤꿀ג甧穈
椚鍑ךפأؐع،صكגׄ鸐ֻבׯֶךծずׄ圓岀ח㼎韋㶨⣘זְׁ㼭׃ꨇכ⸇ךפ䒉鏣 կفحّءֲؙٙ٦ג帾 կׅתְג׃חⴖ㣐ֻבֲ堣⠓ג׃⸇ח➂ךֻ㢳״כָծ猘ׅדתׂתׁכ䕎䡾
12
building MANUAL 䊨玎ךגⰋךծ䒉鏣כأؐع،صץ ְזך꼧厩ח鏣鎘㔳װծ䒉眠דהֿׅ㔳爙חُ،ٕպصوչ䒉鏣 կׅתְגׇさ䭯➬穈ׅחֲ״ֹד椚鍑麓玎ך䒉鏣ח⽃知ד➂
㹺װ✲➬ָծ涺ׅתְג׃䱿㤺הֿ䵿ח䒉鏣ךָⵃ欽罏ךֻ㢳ד➂♧ծכדأؐع،صץ կׇת֮כדֹֽד⸇חָ䌢儗䒉鏣ծ铩ְג䭯䏬 ָծךזה⸬剣חꥷ׃ֲ ٍء٦ا կׅד⢘欽ך瘝ز؎؟ـؑؐװ،؍رًٕ ծדהֿׅⰕ鹌䯴ך✲䊨ה䊨玎גְֶחծGBDFCPPLלִ⢽ לֽזװ⡦ח䒉鏣銲㆞ָ如ך儗ך ָ〳腉הֿׅ幾䩛䨱ך䒉鏣חⰟהּꅾ醱ךծ⡲噟זחֲ״ֹדָֿׅ椚鍑חְַ⽯䏟זז կׅתזח
13
Veneer House - APPROACH -
LOCALITY صك،כדأؐعծ さ匢ַػ׃⳿ⴖ٦״חخ䒉暟ך圓鸡ٖؿ٦ي⡲ׅתկ ׃ַ׃ծ㢩鄲װ〡鿇כגְאחծ괏㕼װ㖑㚖ך䗍俑⻉חさׇծ植㖑ך勞俱װ圓岀䱰欽חהֿׅꅾֹ 縧ְׅתְגկ
㖑㚖ך俑腞חさְזծ瑱搫铩ִַ♷ח䒉暟ֻזכדծ荈ⴓד⡲荈ⴓך䒉眠կ 䢪鋵׃ 勞俱װ⡲倯ל֮דծ荈ⴓך䩛⥜ד籾〳腉דծ䭯竲〳腉ז䒉眠ׅתזהկ ワ㔲ך兝錁ה锃ㄤ׃ծ ٗ٦ٕؕس؎ٓف肪ծ ז䒉眠صץ،כأؐع湡䭷ׅתְג׃կ
14
DISTRIBUTION կأؐع،صץת欰ח㤍堣拄㹱䗁莆ך⯋ղ匌傈劤㣐ꩍ拄 ג׃ה꧊⠓䨽װ٦ةٕؑءך⟎鏣חꬊ䌢儗 կׅתִ罋כ猘הְג׃剣ٍٕءٝذهג䕵甧
կׅתְת׃דַָׁ➿ծ⥂盖כדךֶֻגַׇ㻅鿇勞ךծ㣐ꆀגִ⪒ח儗ך♧ָ♰ծ׃ַ׃ ָծ拄㹱ת ծהֲ遤زحؕך然⥂ծ鿇勞ךծ勞俱׃寸㹀؎ٝؠرַגֹ饯 կׅתְת׃גַַָⴓ儗ך ٗفأؐع،صكծכחֽ㾈أؐع،صץח㜥䨽֮ךؤ٦صֻꥷծ稆傍ֹ筜䚈✲䡾ָ饯װ拄㹱 ׅ䲿⣘גַֹ꧊ַ⦋䏧ֹֽהךծꬊ䌢儗ׇךחزح؛٦وך䋐顋כ傈갦ג׃欰欵ג׃הزؙت 罋ִծהְַזכדךז⸬剣ג׃הيذأء؎ٓف؟ָך կׅתְג䱱㹋植〳腉䚍ך
15
16
17
technique
18
BASIC&ADVANCED SYSTEMS կׅתז殯朐屣ְגַծ縧ד圫ղכ㖑㚖װ㕂זה㖑زؙؑآٗفךأؐع،صץ ֲ⢪倵鏣װ䊨㜥侭ך⪒ծ鏣ל֮زؙؑآٗفג䒉דךⰧ䊨זٕفٝءה⸂ך➂ֻծ募זָꨵ孡 կׅת֮زؙؑآٗفֹדךהֿ גֽⴓֹֻ⚥ծ㣐ֽ竲何葺ג׃湡䭷يذأءז♱㣗ד⤑知״ կ׃תתָ欰يذأءأؐع،صץךא
BASIC SYSTEM
JOINTS
CUTS
ծぐ׃הزحإ卐خ٦ػךず䕎朐 ֻֿײד䊴鴥ח갫ثحظךزحإ 圓鸡⡤ך瘲朐ךוז咿װծ变דה կيذأءֻא ⴓ鿇䊴鴥ךثحظ דהֿ殅דآطג׃加גծ䔲כ կׅתְֹג׃酡䓼 ָ㢳זꅾך勞俱 ְⴓծ תזהさ匢ָ䗳銲ךֻׁ ד穈甧倯ז⽃ְ知ׅװ׃ָծ椚鍑ׅ ծ֮ 帾ⴖ鴥דⴓծ植㜥זٕفٝء ءٖؗؿז〳腉锃侭ךוזֻׅ կׅדيذأءזٕـ
ծכדيذأءؙحء٦ك ծ ծ ז ⸇ثحظ䊴鴥〡ח䕎朐ז⽃秪ו կׅתזהخ٦ػさ匢ָ㛇劤ִ ػ 噰⸂䲧ׁ帾ךثحظװ㼄岀ךخ٦ ⻉⽃秪ךծ⡲噟דהֿׅ⻉ִծ鋉呓 կׅת㔳
أؐع،صץծכيذأءؙحء٦ك ׃⳿ִ罋חⴱ剑דزؙؑآٗفך կׅדيذأء ծ׆ׇה䗳銲ꨵ孡 ך 䕎זٕفٝءֹדزحؕדֺֿ ה加גծ 䔲ׇさ穈خ٦ػך朐 կׅת׃㔿㹀דׄי
19
Veneer House - TECHNIQUE -
ADVANCED SYSTEM
JOINTS
CUTS
⠗ֹד䱸さח㘋湫خ٦ػך匢朐 ⢪ծ嘱䖤زٝؼח➬〡ז窟涸 կزّ؎ٝآ 䫙ծ嘱דꆃ暟ָ♶銲 〳腉կ鍑⡤דֻֽ ְ 礵䏝ָ넝 㢌ךדָծ植㜥ׅד⤑知כծ穈甧 넝ְ礵חֻծ㛇燉瘝׃ꨇכ刿٥锃侭 կׅת䏝ָ実 ָזꅾך 勞俱 ת幥דְさ匢ꆀזծ㼰ְז㼰 կׅ ծת ٓؿֻאזزحٓؿ ךծ㢩鄲瘝כ涪ךزّ؎ٝآُءح կ׃ת׃㣐ֹֻ顀柃ח♳倵䊨䚍ぢ
ח涫㜥ךّٝء٦؛ٔـ؋ؿٕةآر ծ״ ׄծずלֹדִׁⰟ剣ة٦ر ⱄ植דדֿוָ➂⦐ךךㅷ颵 կ׃תזחֲ״ֹד ة$/$ٕ٦ 䕎朐זծ醱꧟כ㜥さֹד⢪欽٦ ⳿ⴖخ٦ػך稢ְַ➬〡׃ ծ׃ 勞俱⸬桦ծ⮚넝ְ䓼䏝ծ״ կׅת׃鷄実知⤑ׁ瘝ך穈甧
20
さחծ㛇劤涸כيذأءزأٝغس، ⢪ׄיװ欽ְծꆏךخ٦ػ匢 կׅדيذأءג甧穈ח׆ 醱ְב㛇חة٦ر٦ةُ٦ؾٝ؝ ٔـ؋ؿٕةآرخ٦ػך䕎朐ז꧟ ד٦ة٦ٕ$/$ٕ٦خّٝء٦؛ կׅתְ遤ג甧穈דծ植㜥׃زحؕ
⽂♲ꤵصץ،أؐع 傈劤 㹧㙹源 匌傈劤㣐ꩍ拄䖓ך鄃拄㖑גְֶחծ⟎鏣⡝㸓ֶֽח⡝橆㞮ך何㊣ָ実⚥ծ暴ֶח괏スחꟼׅ銲実ָ侧㢳 ֻ䮙ָ׃תְגկ 㹺ך杞ְ괏ス״㣐ֹז괏スח涺♧ד筰ְⰅחկ ז䖞勻ך؍ذصُى؝ך穠勲Ⱏׅ⤛ ず嵭㜥ָ劍䖉ׁ׃תְגկ ⽂♲ꤵصץ،כأؐعծⰟず嵭㜥鎘歗ך痥♧劍ג׃הծ㖑㚖➂ךղָ孡鯪ח甧㺔لأ٦ֲ״זהأ鏣鎘٥䒉鏣ׁ ׃תկ 㹧㙹源欵ך⠄勞ַ⡲صץ،さ匢欽ְծ ךٗف䪮遭ח걾׆㷕欰♧װ菙➂ךղג״ח穈甧ג 知⤑ד䐡⣣זծ ַא㖑㚖欵噟ך䮶莆װ橆㞮何㊣ח顀柃ׅ䒉眠圓岀ׅתְגזהկ ׆תծ䋐㜥ח剑⳿㔐صץְג،さ匢Ⱈ♲ך匢 Y NNن٦س搀꼽 ֲ״ְז⳿ךNN⽃⡘׃ⶴⴓדծ ח穈甧ג欽ⴖך鴥ثحظׅתֶֹגⰅדزحٖؕفկ ֿثحظ湱✼ח䊴׃鴥דהֿ鿇勞ず㡦 䱸さ׃ծ畭勞أؽה欽ְג酡䓼ָז׃穈甧ׅתְֹגגկ 穈甧ָג知⤑ד鍑⡤獳眠〳腉ךֿז圓岀כծ鄃拄㖑װ筜䚈٥⟎鏣涸ז䒉眠ך銲ח黝ׅתְג׃կ תծ鿇勞ؿٔفך ؋؛ٔـ٦ג״חزծ ״鴼鸞يذأءז鷄⿹ָהְֻֿג׃〳腉ׅתזהկ
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$鏣鎘倵䊨ծ㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦فحّءؙ鏣鎘倵䊨ծ㹧㙹㣐㷕䎂䀤㊣嵞灇瑔㹓鏣鎘倵 䊨ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ吳䒭⠓爡م٦ي䒉勞䏄زحٖؕفծ㖑㚖⡝孖倵䊨ծ➭
21
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
22
23
Plan
Scale 1/200
Section
Scale 1/100
Axon Sketch 24
25
26
笨嵋صץ،أؐع 傈劤 㹧㙹源 笨嵋صץ،כأؐعծ⽂♲ꤵصץ،أؐع何葺ג׃圓䟝ׁصץ،أؐع痥✳䔉ׅדկ 匌傈劤㣐ꩍ拄ך鄃㹱ח黧 㖑⯋ך怒噟穈さ剣䘊ג״ח㖑㚖⠄勞ⵃ欽ג׃倵䊨ׁծ ؍ذصُى؝꧊⠓䨽Ⱟ⦋䏧鎘歗ׅדկ 劤כדزؙؑآٗفծ䒉鏣ךגⰋך䊨玎ה䩛갫 չ䒉鏣ُصو،ٕպח㔳爙׃ծ鏣鎘㔳鍑铣גֻז׃知⽃ח䒉鏣ך 麓玎椚鍑➬ֹד穈㼪Ⰵ׃ת׃կ ֿ״חծ䒉鏣ך䩛䨱זֻזָծ ך傈ך儗ך䒉鏣銲㆞ָծ如ח⡦װ ⽯ְַזזלֽז䏟ח椚鍑׃ծ⡲噟鹌׃תֹדָהֿկ ؎תٝة٦׃➜زحط䊨玎Ⱅךג״ח ծꟼ⤘ぐ➂ח䊨✲ך鹌䯴ָ鑫稢ח⠗ִ׃תկ 㖑㚖أך٦أ欰ַג׃ չ傍ֻ㸜ֻ知⽃חպさ鎉衝חծ ֿصץך ،أؐع痥✳䔉כדծ ً؍ر،ח㣐䌴ז何葺ָ⸇ִ׃תկ
ث٦ي"SDIJUFDUVSF GPS )VNBOJUZهأٝ؟٦ծ㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦فحّءؙ鏣鎘倵䊨ծ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌 ⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ溪司䊨蔓吳䒭⠓爡زحٖؕفծ谏㽵㷀䝜倵䊨ծ笨嵋怒噟⼿ず穈さ剣䘊 倵䊨ծ➭
②パネル組立
②パネル組立
②パネル組立 4.基礎梁の移動/固定
Ძ᧓
ⅲ.X1の基礎梁の固定
6.柱の組立てと補強材固定
Წ᧓
ⅱ.柱の組立て (Y2/Y5)
*注意点*
1.Y6の梁を柱の直下まで手で運ぶ 2.梁の中心でバンドを括りつける
2枚
2枚
2枚
2枚
2枚
2枚
3.各柱の下に脚立を用意する
24枚
4.柱に2人ずつ、ユニック操作1人、全体指揮1人の配置につく 5.ユニックで梁を持ち上げる その際に梁が暴れないように柱にいる人が支えながら上げる 6.柱の上部まで上がったら徐々に下ろして切り込み部を合わせる
SC3
ビスを打ち込み辛い懸念があるので、 場合によってはグレーの部分を 適宜切り落としてください。
SC3
C3
C6
SC3
SC3
SC3
SC3
C5
C8
SC3
SC3
C4
C7
SC3
SC3
SC3
SC3
C5
C8
SC3
SC3
SC3
C7
C4
SC3
SC3
Წଐ
ⅱ.補強材の固定
・上棟した時点で垂直水平が保てているか確認する必要アリ
ー人数が十分でない時もやらない
・大工さんよく相談して補正を行う
ー必ず ゆっくり 行うこと
・確認するポイントとしては、
ー1箇所を先に入れてしまうと他が入らなく なる事があるので必ず3箇所同時に行う ーY6⇒Y5⇒Y4⇒Y3⇒Y2⇒Y1の順で行う
1.梁がたわんでいないかどうか →たわんでいた場合下から上げて、20㎜程の むくり をつけておく
7.一気に入れようとせずに水平に下げるよう気をつけながら行う
2.柱が垂直かどうか
8.完全に下ろしたらバンドをはずして終了
3.Y1からY6までのピッチが正しいか →内壁や垂木を固定する前に必ず補正しておく
SC3
SC3
ー風が強い日に無理をしてやらない
9.垂直水平の補正
4.梁が曲がっていないかどうか
SC3
SC3
Ჭ᧓gᲰ Ჭଐ
ⅰ.ユニックによる梁上げ
・手順
フィンから40m離して固定すること (補強材がこの後くるため)
②パネル組立
7.梁上げ
*中心に括りつける
SC3
C6
C3
SC3
SC3
各柱部分に脚立2台で2人ずつ配置 or 外周部に足場を組む(現場で要相談)
Construction Manual
27
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
28
29
Site Plan
Section
Section Detail
Scale 1/1000
Plan
Scale 1/200
Scale 1/200
Scale 1/50 30
31
32
٦ةٝإؚٝصٔ募ٓ٦قظو ؎ٝذػ ٦وٍٝى ծכ٦ةٝإؚٝصٔ募ٓ٦قظو ٝصٓ٦ׁ䒉鏣חהה꧊衅⡝孖גחٔ募قظو⼒盖؍رؒ٦َٙך٦وٍٝى կׅד٦ةٝإؚ 遹欰橆㞮ך㖑倯꧊衅ָ呓䊴ָ䎢ךה鿪䋐״ח⻉ٕغٗ٦ؚծ孖⚺⻉٥גׄ鸐麊㌀ך䒉鏣䖓ה䒉鏣 ぢ♳ծך欰崞橆㞮זתׂתׁךוז侄肪堣⠓װ կׅתְג׃ה湡涸הֿׅ♷㺔ח⻉䓼؍ذصُى؝ת ծ׃噰⸂幾ծ鿇勞侧כדزؙؑآٗف劤 ת㔳⻉⤑知ז刿ך䒉鏣䊨玎ן⿹؎ٝؠرחֲ״ֹד䒉鏣ח㺁僒״ կ׃ ծכדְ植㜥ז䖤ךꨵ孡 կ׃ת倵䊨ָ遤דⰧ麣ꣲךךֺֿךהַה صץכחծ圓鸡ת կ׃ת׃湡䭷䒉眠徇ֽ鴥חծ㖑㚖דהֿׅ⢪欽稆勞ך植㖑ךוז畾כח־♳➬♧倯ծׅ⢪欽،勞
鏣鎘倵䊨ծ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵فحّءؙ؎ٝٙ٦ؠر٦ծ㼭卌٥圊؟ٝهأ:.$"ي٦ث ➭䊨ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ谏㽵㷀䝜倵䊨ծ㖑㚖⡝孖倵䊨ծ
33
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
34
35
Site Plan
Plan
Scale 1/1000
Scale 1/200
Section
Scale 1/200
36
37
38
؞؝ٝ募⥂肪㕦 ؾٔ؍ؿٝ من٦ٕ䃊 ؞؝ٝ募כծ䏝ꅾזꩍ拄װ〴괏״ח㣐ֹז鄃㹱ؾٔ؍ؿֽ「ٝمنך٦ٕ䃊ח⡘縧ׅծ➂〡秈 ➂ך募ד ׅկ +*$"ַ♧鿇项ꆃ䲿⣘ֽ「ծ ⦜㠨⥂׃肪㕦䗁莆ׅ鎘歗ָ甧׃תגկ 䒉暟ך낦穈鿇ⴓכծ ؝اػٝر٦חة䖞ג荈⹛涸ח堣唒ؕصץׁزح،さ匢ػך٦خծずֻׄصץ،匢״ח 嘱ػך٦؎ّآדخׅٝزծ杝荈ך圓岀ד䒉ׅתְגגկ 植㖑ךדさ椚䚍ꅾ鋔׃ծ♧ⴖ䱸滠٥ꆏ٥ꨵ⹛䊨Ⱗ欽 ְׅדيذأءְזךהֿկ 䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕ך㷕欰ֻזדֽծ募➂⫴⼿ךה⡲噟ׅהծ㖑㚖ך㶨⣘װ ך㹺做הծずׄ圓岀ֻאׯֶדٙ٦فحّءؙ遤ֲַֿה㨣׃תկ 낦穈ח㼎ֽ➰《ג׃ծ䒉暟ך㢩 淼זה稆勞כחծ植㖑ך畾箟ٕطػ欽ְծ孡⦪װ⠗窟䒉眠ח꼧厩؎ؠرٝ湡䭷׃ת׃կ
ث٦ي+*$"ꫬ䎃嵲㢩⼿⸂هأٝ؟٦ծ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծ㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦ءؙ ّفح鏣鎘倵䊨ծ➙劤㉔♧䓼䏝鑐꿀ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ#PIPM *TMBOE 4UBUF 6OJWFSTJUZ倵鏣䲿⣘ծ㖑㚖⡝孖倵䊨 ծ➭
39
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
40
41
Ω͙͑ͥͲ͚ͥ
Ω͙͑ͥʹ͚ͩ
Ω͙͑ͥͳ͚ͩ
Ω͙͑ͤ͵ͧͶ͚ͩ͢
Ω͙͑ͦ͢Ϳ͚ͤ͡
Ω͙͚͑ͦ͢͡
Ω͙͚͑ͣͧ
Ω͑ͥ
Ω͙͑͢Ͷ͚ͥ͡
Ω͙͑ͨͽ͚ͣͩ
Ω͙͑ͣ;͚ͩ
Ω͙͑ͣͺͥͼͩͻ͚ͥ
Drawing for Pre-Cut
Wood Joint with Wooden Wedges
Axonometric
42
43
44
أؐع،صץزح؝ٍٔث ٓؕ䊜س ٕ٦ػط ծכأؐع،صץزح؝ٍٔث ծג׃הف؎ةزٗفך㹺׃㼎䘔חٔ٦ى؋ؿؚٕٝء 鄃拄ך٦ٕ㖑ꩍػطך䎃 㖑ծ կ׃תג䒉דزح؝ٍٔثٓؕ䊜س ꅾֻ厫圓鸡כծ㠖ׅה䒉勞ז⚺瀖װٖؖٝכ㹺ךٕ٦ػطז⠗窟涸 կ׃תְגת׃גְ䬸鄃㹱זֲ״ךծ➙㔐׆ֶגזה 넝ְ圓ך厫鮾䚍ד鯪ꆀגְ欽ծさ匢כדزؙؑآٗف劤 կ׃ת׃⿹鷄䊨岀׃黝ח㖑㚖ז崞涪ך⹛ծ㖑ꩍ崞ג״חהֿׅ䱰欽يٖ٦ؿ鸡 ծזה㼭卌灇瑔㹓ָ⚥䗰ךծ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕כأؐعَصكزح؝ٍٔث ⡲ג׃⼿ずהさ匢ً٦ؕ٦ךزح؝ٍٔث կ׃ת ծ׃⢪欽加勞ך植㖑《ַزأٖؓؿ؍ذصُى؝ ָ➂ղךֽծ㖑㚖ח㔐䗁ה䗁莆ךַꩍ拄ךٕ٦ػط կ׃ת䒉鏣䊨✲ָ遤גזה♧⡤
鏣鎘倵䊨ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡فحّءؙ؎ٝٙ٦ؠر䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծ㼭卌٥圊ي٦ث ➭ծ㖑㚖⡝孖倵䊨ծزأذծ倵䊨زحٖؕفծ%PMBLIB 1MZXPPE *OD
45
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
46
47
Frame Section
48
49
50
♫٠嵋ؽ٦أؐعث 傈劤 㹧㙹源 ♫٠嵋ؽ٦⟎כأؐعث鏣ذأ٦ן״ֶآ嵲ך㹺ג׃הծ匌傈劤㣐ꩍ拄䖓䎃♫זה٠嵋ך嵲ֹ牜ג鎘歗ׁ ׃תկ ءٝعזٕف٦ٔءؿٝت٦ך䕎朐״חծさ匢ؾ٦ךأ珏겲דתחא ⡚幾ֹדָהֿׅծ➙ח♳⟃דת穈 甧ָג知僒⻉ׁ׃תկ 㢙ךծ 鹈ⵃך欽ׁ劤䒉暟כծ嫣䎃穈甧הג鍑⡤ָ粸鵤ׁծ ؝ٝ؟٦וזؑؿؕװز嵋ךד،ذؽ؍ذؙ ך؍㜥ׅתזהկ 䖞勻ך䒉暟ה嫰ץծ知僒ז㛇燉ה鯪ꆀٖؿך٦ָيծ⥂盖٥麊䵤٥䒉鏣ח銲زأ؝ׅ䫇ִׅתկ ֿך ⟎鏣صك،כأؐعծ㢙ך嵲渿חⰟה־♳ծꩍ拄ד㢳ֻ㣟ְ⫊♫ְא٠嵋ך㔐䗁䖓䬃׃׃䗁莆ח㺔♷ׅ ֿה격ג⡲׃תկ
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծ㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦فحّءؙ鏣鎘倵䊨ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ溪 司䊨蔓吳䒭⠓爡زحٖؕفծ㖑⯋넝吤倵䊨ծ➭
51
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
Flush Joint Detail
52
53
Axonometric
54
55
56
ٞصץ أ؍،蘠㹓 ؙٗ،ث، ٞأ؍䃊 傈劤ך䒉眠俑⻉稱➜׃ծ傈劤ؙٗה،ث،ך俑⻉❛崧ׅ⤛湡涸דծ ؙٗ،ث،ךٞأ؍䃊ח蘠㹓ָ䒉׃תגկ הה傈劤ך蘠㹓כ獳⹛〳腉⟎ד鏣涸ָ׃דծ荈ָ穈甧גג⡲ךֿさ匢ך蘠㹓תծ傈劤䒉眠ֲ״ךך זַװז׃ז䚍呓邌植ׅתְג׃կ ؎ٔة،ַ麊לさ匢כٕطػծ صكٗأ،ך넝吤֮ח$/$ٕ٦ة٦ד侄肪♧ך橆ׁزحؕג׃הծ ؙٗ،ث، ךٞأ؍䃊ח麊גל蘠㹓הפ穈甧׃תגկ 鯪䘯ז蘠㹓כծワ㔲ך瀖ٖװٝךؖ䒉眠ה㥨㼎撑׃זծ殯ז俑⻉涸胜兝䭯䭯竲〳腉ז䒉眠ג׃הٞأ؍䃊ך ➂ղ׃תⰅֽ「חկ
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծ㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦فحّءؙ鏣鎘倵䊨ծ ظٓى䊨猰㣐㷕 鏣鎘倵䊨ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ صكٗأ،ך㖑⯋䊨噟넝吤زحٖؕفծ➭
57
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
58
59
Axonometric
60
61
62
صץ،أؐع擓劤 傈劤 擓劤源 صك،أؐع擓劤7),כծ剑㼭ꣲصكך،أؐع湡䭷ג׃鎘歗ׁ׃תկ ट䓼ך䎢ׁـך٦כأծꬊ䌢儗כח知 僒涸ז⡝חְתծ遳ك؎ךٝز儗כח獳⹛䒭㾊〴חծ ךדأ؍ؿؔת䩧さـׇ٦וזأ圫ղז欽鷿ⵃח欽〳腉דծ䗳銲 חֹהז穈甧גծ欽✲ָ幥ל鍑⡤عֶֽגת׃ג׃ٝז؍ر噰㼭صك،ׅדأؐعկ
Ve Ve
V V
V V
Yatai (Vendor Stall)
Tea House
Possibility of Daily Use
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘穈甧ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ➭
63
Playroom for Kids
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
64
×2
×2
×2
×3 Layout of Plywood Board
65
Exploded Axonometric
66
ꆏְזך嵲ך㹺 傈劤 牞㣽䊛源 ꆏְזך嵲ך㹺כծ 䎃ך匌❨ؔٔٝإכדؙحؾ٦ؚٔٝ畸䪮ָ⪵✮㹀֮ד寐ך䃊ך晙戭匌嵋ח䒉鏣ׁծ 㢙ꣲ㹀ؽך٦ؔٔؽػثׅٝדկ ،٦ث朐ءךٝזٕف䕎כծ ךא殯ػז٦ְגֹדדךخծ鴼鸞ַא㺁僒 ח䒉鏣ָ〳腉ׅדկ ַ剢ꣲ㹀ך鏣זהծ嫣䎃穈甧הג鍑⡤ָ粸鵤ׁׅתկ ٓ؎إؿ٦غ٦ך䖉堣䨽٥佸隊㹓٥ٓؔآ佝鷏㽷ְה堣腉ろؔٔؽػךֿٝכծꆏ♧أؽװ劤⢪欽זְג׃ ְծ鍑⡤䖓דְֹ㸜Ⰻז瀧嵋ָ⥂ׅתկ תծ鯪ꆀٖؿז٦הي-7-⽃匢琎㾴勞ء״חٝזٕف㛇燉״חծ⥂盖װ鱐鷏ծ䒉鏣زأ؝ך䫇ִׅתְגկ IUUQT LVHJOPOBJ VNJOPJF DPN
ث٦ي/10岀➂嵲ֻׁ هأٝ؟٦ծ傈劤頿㔚ծ هأٝ؟٦ծ㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦فحّءؙ鏣鎘倵䊨ծꈿ加㉔ 圓鸡ծ ꅿ罈劉꧅؎ؠرؙح؍ؿؚٓٝծ溪司䊨蔓吳䒭⠓爡زحٖؕفծꞿ靼蠜倵䊨ծ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂ 灇瑔⠓倵䊨ծ㖑㚖⡝孖倵䊨ծ➭
67
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
68
69
Axonometric
70
71
72
صكٗأ، ؔٔؽػ؍ذصُى؝ٝ صكٗأ، ٗأٞؑص٥خرؚٓ صكٗأ،ٗأךٞؑص٥֮חخرؚٓ䊨噟넝吤ך胜䖓ך啾ח䒉鏣ׁؔٔؽػךֿٝכծ欰䖝ה鵚ꦄך⡝孖״ח ג꧊⠓ئٖفװٝذ٦ّءٝծ ؎كٝز瘝חך⢪欽ׁׅתկ 䒉暟ך鏣鎘ה倵䊨כ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕㼭卌灇瑔⠓شٍٔـُٔה㣐㷕(MB[BS灇瑔㹓ך㷕欰⚺ך㼪ג״ח遤ծ넝 吤欰׃ת׃⸇կ 变咿ך圓鸡⡤כ넝吤ך$/$ٕ٦ة٦ءׁ⳿ⴖג״חֺֿךהٝזٕفさ匢ػך٦ דخ圓䧭ׁׅתְגկ 佝涸ז圓鸡⡤ָծ ״佝涸ה➂ז㜥䨽ךꟼ⤘䚍䕎גְגֻב妜ְֲהְ׃격ְ鴥גծ䒉׃תגկ
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծ ُٔشٍٔـ㣐㷕(MB[BS灇瑔㹓鏣鎘倵䊨ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ㖑 ⯋䊨噟넝吤倵䊨ծ➭
73
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
74
75
Axonometric
76
77
78
79
80
擓劤ٌؔ؛ٝػ٦ؙ 傈劤 擓劤源 ٌؔ؛ٝػ٦כؙծ擓劤؎ًךٝ،٦؛٦♳֮דא♧ךس鸐屟ְךծ㖑ꩍך䕦갟《ד㠨ׁךٕؽת׃ג騊㖑 ⵃ欽ֻאג׃劍ꣲ㹀Ⱅך㕦ׅדկ ꩍ拄䖓ծ䒉暟ⱄך䒉顤欽ָ넝꿳ד⚥ׅծ չ䒉ְזגպ瑞ֹ㖑ⱄ欰ך〳腉䚍 䱱הず儗חծ擓劤ךתך չ㼭ׁז㶨鸬 ד孡鯪ח⠅䤰ֹד㜥䨽ָ 駈ְזպ ְֲה铬겗鍑寸㔳ֻץծ㹋꿀涸 ח鏣ִ׃תկ ؝٦ؼ٦ةأٝװس琎加ך麇ן㜥ⰕחⰟה㕦⚥ך䗰ח䒉صץג،כדأؐعծ〢劤㾊ך չ〢剅导宏爡պָ窩劤 ⚥䗰׃הㅷ䲧ִ⳿ך䓸顋㡰遤ְծ㼭ׁז㶨ֶַ䎃㺔ָדת꧊ֲ庛ְַ瑞♧חֻב鬨顠ְ׃תկ
ث٦ي加⨳㕼㖑䲿⣘ծ嘑⾱溪⟰歗麊㌀ծ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘穈甧ծ ؿ؋نٓـ豣⽂㼭㕂 倵鏣䲿⣘ծ擓劤䋐孖穈甧ծ➭
81
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
82
83
84
歊㕦锃䋒㼭㷕吤 㶨⣘أؐع؎ٖف 傈劤 匌❨ 歊㕦锃䋒㼭㷕吤גח鏣縧ׁךֿ㶨⣘כأؐع؎ٖفծ㶨⣘ָ嚂ֻ׃꧊ְծ麇ץ㜥䨽ֲ״זהծ㶨⣘ך㼄岀ח さ؎ؠرגׇׁٝصى٥صك،ׅדأؐعկ ؤ؎؟صى佦חծ兛媮⢪欽ךהֿׅ㢳ְ㔊Ⱂ匢غثعءٝ ♧״ 㔐㼭ְׁ♲Ⱈ匢غؙٗـ؟ٝךさ匢欽ְ׃תֻאגկ 㹺Ⱗכ㠖ה㣓❁ַػ׃⳿ⴖ٦דخ㶨⣘荈 魦ָחֲ״ֻא䊨㣗ֶׁגծⴖ׃⳿䖓ך瑎כ圫ղז邌䞔ך겣䲽ֹծ㶨⣘ַ鋵؎ؠرת׃ٝה ׃תזկ
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘穈甧ծ歊㕦锃䋒㼭㷕吤㹺Ⱗ穈甧ծ➭
85
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
86
87
88
أ٦ـأ؍ؿؔ畾⚥䊨䏄匌❨劤䏄 ❨ 傈劤 匌 ծ鼘ꨇ䨽דהֿׅ鱐鷏ח植㖑ג׃ծ♧䏝鍑⡤כחꥷֹ筜䚈✲䡾ָ饯װծ拄㹱׃⢪欽ג׃הأ٦ـךⰻأ؍ؿؔכ兛媮 կׅד䲿周ךأؐع،صكֹד鯄欽ח㼭ְׁ㺊屯倵鏣װأ٦لأز٦ك؎ٓفך ؔ❨匌ך㣐䩛䒉鏣⠓爡ծ畾⚥䊨䏄 ծגחأ؍ؿ կ׃ת׃⡲䧭أ٦ـך鎘 珏ׅ⳿ⶼ瑞ךךسؤٗ٦ؙהٝفؔ٦ ׃ת׃ 珏겲ⵖ⡲瑞ֶֽ騃ꨄ׃㼰ַ⠓鑧ךծワ㔲כחؒٔ،ؚٝ؍ذ٦ىך ꥡָ遤ׇさ䩧ךֻ㢳 կ կف؎ةךծ变٥咿圓鸡כא♧ կׅדف؎ةٔ٦ٝ㠖ؙأךծ♶鋉垷圫כא♧ֲ 婍׃⳿ⴖخ٦ػⰧծ㹺כ䖓罏 կׅתְגזהٔ٦ٝ㠖ؙأתתךָٕطػך կׅדأ٦ـז知僒ךְ鍑⡤٥ⱄ圓眠ז⢪أؽװꆏו կ׃ת׃ⵖ⡲ח璞ꥷא✳أ٦ـך㣐ֹ湡׃㼰䧭ַ鿇㾊ךծ醱侧כח㛁ؒٔ،ך♧倯ծ ꥡ ָזְח⚥ծכא♧ 纇կأ٦ـ➂⦐ׄ䠬חַחָ圫㶨ךワ㔲 婍׃⳿ⴖخ٦ػⰧ㹺כ䒷䨫ה㠖ךず圫ծ姻הךך ꥡ կׅתְגֹדַٕطػך 纇կأ٦ـؚٝ؍ذ٦ىז剑黝חְさ׃鑧ךד➂ծ醱侧כא♧ֲ ؑثٕـ٦ذךֽ ➂䱦 կׅתְגָׁ欽䠐زًٝآ،ٖٝךוז䌎أؙحنװ، կׅתְגְְ崞欽׀ח⫴ֻ涺圫דأ؍ؿؔ➙כֿ
䊨蔓爡كْ؎ծ倵䊨ծ吳䒭⠓爡زحٖؕف䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծ溪司䊨蔓吳䒭⠓爡ي٦ث ➭㹺Ⱗ醡⡲ծ畾⚥䊨䏄穈甧ծ
89
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
90
1F Meeting Area: Type A
91
1F Meeting Area: Type B
92
5F Office Area 93
94
ֲַٙ؎ٝ ؍ذأ؎ذٝؔٔؽػؚٝ 傈劤 状䃊源 匌傈劤㣐ꩍ拄ַ 䎃⟃♳ך儗ָ穗גծ状䃊⾱㶨⸂涪ꨵ䨽ַ LN㕢ⰻ֮ח䊛ⰻ募כד秈 ך募孖ָ䌓募ג׃ ְׅתկ ֲַٙ؎ٝ吳䒭⠓爡תծ 䎃ךֿ״㖑ד倜ְ׃欵噟זהٙ؎ٝ鸡㨣׃תկ ֿ؍ذأ؎ذך ٝؔٔؽػؚٝךגⰋך鿇勞כծ㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓ך㷕欰ָ$/$ٕ٦ة٦植㖑ך傊礵㺘堣唒䊨㜥ח䭯鴥ⴖד ׃ת׃⳿կ N錬ؕحؑثך٦ؚحٓؿ朐ך㠖ד圓䧭ׁءُٝؗזؙحٔن٦כـծ䎢ְֲוע歹鋅兦ׅ 㜥䨽ח䒉ծ ך繟ְ׃兝葿חⰟה䊛ⰻ募ך倜ְ׃ٙ؎ٝ欰欵鋅㸚ׅתֹײגկ
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ ֲַٙ؎ٝ 倵䊨ծ➭
95
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
96
97
98
أؐعֻ٦ו ❨ 傈劤 匌 ؗךְֲ/),הֲ״׃ֻֽ葺ה׳ծ爡⠓䮋ד،ر؎،ס֮䗰ןծ麇׃㼎ח铬겗ך⚥ך⚅זָ镘鍑寸 ٦ٝلٍٝ ֿꬠㄏպկׄכչ חو٦ذչ㺔➰պכדת 䎃 剢 傈։ 傈 ְֽ֮պׅչ/),娕劣 ֽׅչ/),嵲㢩 ְ֮պ ֻⰅֶꆃ׆ִծ䙼ג䭯莆ח➂ז搀ꟼ䗰ח➰ծ兛媮㺔ׁ٦ָٝ㾜لְֲٍٝؗꆃה կ׃תׁ،ָ罋周ر؎ꆃ،ז圫ղזֲ״ז أ٦لأ؍ذصُى؝㨣➰ծ㺔֮ח牞㹧❛䊴挿 չזחֻ٦וך٦ةٍؙٓؗךծ/),גחչTVCB$0պ կ׃ת׃⳿ⶼ٦ش٦؝ֹד⡤꿀،ر؎ꆃ،ז圫ղׁծ罋周׃鏣縧պأؐعֻ٦ו
➭/),⟰歗ծ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘穈甧ծي٦ث
99
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
100
101
102
⻌嵲麣صץ،ُؗ٦ـ 傈劤 ⻌嵲麣 ⻌嵲麣صك،ُؗ٦כـծ㖑⯋ך加勞غؕٓء֮דծ ؎َةծ ٗسծ ךוזخوسز邌䞔װ葿ך殯ז埠珏ךさ匢甧 ⡤涸ח穈圓鸡暟ׅדկ ぢְַさֲ穈ךה䎮勞ח殯ז埠珏ךさ匢ָ欽ְծ鋅錬䏝ג״ח馯ך 殯؎ؠرזׅٝתְגזהկ 匢勞ָ如⯋涸ח䊴׃鴥גת穈ךָֿ♳圓岀כծⰋ⡤ג׃ה䓼㔿ז圓鸡暟䧭ׅתְג׃կ ず♧䎂ך鿇勞כ눴 ך㽰㽵ך䕎ذُءح؍ؿ׃٦ٕ؎ّآָٝזאדزծ חֿא湡ך湫遤鿇勞䯏Ⰵדהֿׅ鿇勞ָהַ׃ 㔿㹀ׁ➬穈涪׃ת׃կ Ⰻ⡤圓䧭ׅ㢳侧ך㔊錬䕎כ啟זהծ㔳剅긫װ剅䏄וז圫ղז㜥ⵃךד欽ח黝ׅתְג׃կ
ث٦ي畾⚥䊨䏄⚺⪵٥⟰歗ծ䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘穈甧ծ⻌嵲麣甧筨さ灇瑔堣圓卌欵鑐꿀㜥ծ 吳䒭⠓爡✳أؙحةծ⻌嵲麣劦䌽䊨噟넝瘝㷕吤ծ秀⟻㕂㾊剅䏄劦䌽劤䏄ծ➭
103
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
104
Axon Composition with Different Types of Wood from Hokkaido Locally
2710.0
⑩
⑨ Fish-Tail Joint
542.0
542.0
542.0
542.0
542.0
2710.0 Elevation
105
Scale 1/50
Japanese Poplar
Japanese Larch
Japanese White Birch
Japanese Maple
106
إ؍ذصُى؝ ٕػٝة٦ ؎ٝءطس،ծ ءؑؐٓأ䃊 䎃 剢 傈ծ ٕػ䋐ַ ज⯓ך尣ُثصؚوד٦ך س㖑ꩍָ錁庠ׁ׃תկ 竲ְג峸岚ָ涪欰׃ծ屟䁘鿇ך 䒉暟♧䰾կ ך䖓㕼瀧拄㹱ָ銒ְծ秈 䨫ך⡝㸓ָ䴦㠨ծ ♰➂➂ךղח䕦갟׃תִ♷կ ⚅歲涸ח ֿך䎃剑鄃㹱ך㣐ַֹ㖑ꩍדծ頾⫊罏秈 ➂ծ娤罏秈 ➂鎸ꐮ׃ת׃կ ֲֿ׃朐屣גֽ「ծ鼘ꨇּٍׅؗٝךف埆إ؍ذصُى؝ ٕػחٝة٦ך䒉鏣ָ鎘歗ׁ׃תկ 暴䗙涸♲ז錬ך䕎 כծ ֿך㖑ך⠗窟涸ז⡝㸓 3VNBI 5BNCJ ח滠䟝䖤ׅתְגկ さ匢כずׄءؑؐٓأ䃊ד植㖑ך耵➂حٖؕفג״ח ׁزծ倵䊨כח㖑⯋➂ךղغװٝسٝ䊨猰㣐㷕ծ ؝ُٓرة㣐㷕ך䒉眠㷕欰׃ת׃⸇ָկ
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծ*"* 1BMVծꈿ加㉔圓鸡ծ غٝسٝ䊨猰㣐㷕倵䊨ծ ؝ُٓرة 㣐㷕倵䊨ծ➭
107
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
108
109
Elevation
110
111
112
سحك ـ ؙحـ٦أ# #ـ٦أխ 傈劤 匌❨ # #ـ٦➂⦐כأ㸓ך㶨⣘鿇㾊Ⱟ剅保חך鏣鎘ׁ甧⡤呓㶨㛇劤ـ׃ה٦ׅדأկ չ⻌嵲麣صץ،ُؗ٦ ـպ ד涪ׁ鯥倯ぢח呓㶨穈圓鸡㛇劤׃הծ سח،ծⰻ㢩ⴖ➬胜匢ծ ♳ג׃鿇ָ♳ח䎮⸇ ִك؎ٓفג٦ز䚍넝صץ،ׅדأؐعկ 圓鸡⡤♧כ菙涸ח崧鸐Ⱈ♲ְג׃匢ה鎉 NN Y NN ך垥彊涸ךؤ؎؟זさ匢欽ְծ害欽䚍넝圓䧭ׅתְג׃הկ 㶨⣘ָ荈ⴓ♧➂ך瑞䭯חההא㢩⩎כ劤啟٥귅啟ⵃג׃ה欽ָהֿׅ〳腉ָׅדծ胜匢㢩ⰻדהֿׅ㢩 箢ֹדהֿ־זאחַװծⰻ㢩؛صُى؝ך٦ّءٝ➬ך倯ֹ稢ַֻ锃侭ָהֿׅ〳腉ׅדկ
ث٦ي䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕4'$㼭卌⽆➂灇瑔⠓鏣鎘倵䊨ծ溪司䊨蔓吳䒭⠓爡زحٖؕفծ倵䊨ծ㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦ؙ فحّء倵䊨ծ➭
113
Veneer House - PROJECTS -
114
21 150 21
250.5
400
500
21
320
21
500
320
2410
2500
320
500
21
320
21
500
320
21 113
250.5
Isometric
250.5
500
500
500
500
250.5
2500 250.5
500
500
500 2500
Plan
115
A
Elevation
500
250.5
116
117
118
An original text for “Digital Wood Design: Innovative Techniques of Representation in Architectural Design”, from the Springer 2019
EMPATHIC ARCHITECTURE:
Digital Fabrication and Community Participation by Hiroto Kobayashi* and Don O’Keefe**
Abstract This paper examines a new construction method in engineered wood material, including plywood and LVL (Laminated Veneer Lumber), using computer numerically controlled routers to build simple buildings in a quick and inexpensive way. With the method elaborate on here, there is no need to use skilled labor or sophisticated construction equipment. It provides an effective way of rebuilding in the wake of natural disasters. The primary innovations of this method are in ease of construction and transportation by using flat, portable, and durable engineered wood products, application of the traditional wisdom in wooden carpentry, and the efficiency of digital fabrication technology. In the case of disaster relief, using this construction process as a method of organizing community is essential for successful implementation. The experience of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami in March, 2011 in north-east Japan highlights the importance of bringing both technical and social skills to disaster reconstruction. Keywords: empathy, ethics, engineered wood, CNC machine, public participation, mutually-built, selfbuilt, disaster reconstruction, inclusivity
1. Introduction In the last two decades we have been facing significant difficulties in maintaining ‘ordinary’ and peaceful order of our lives, socially and spatially. Natural disaster, terrorism, large scale migration, and other unpredictable issues have made it increasingly difficult to foresee the future form of architecture or the city. Instead of planning decades into the future, we have to be prepared to adapt to what is happening in front of us at any moment, and react to new realities spontaneously. We cannot give up trying to improve our future, and yet we have to accept the inevitability of drastic change. Being resolved to adapt to these unpredictable changes, and revise our own idea of what is ‘normal,’ we also have to ask ourselves: what constitutes contentment in life? What kind of life goals would we like to pursue collectively; and, how can we make them happen? Now, we are facing a time in history in which individuals, more than groups, are starting to express their hopes explicitly. In daily life, and increasingly through the internet and social media, we express our ideas for our better lives, and our individual desires. But in order to create a coherent response to the challenges ahead, we must also recover an ability to hope and act collectively. Unfortunately, it seems that many of the conventional channels for collective action are narrowing, in recent times. Political participation has been decreasing in many developed countries, and though leaders are directly elected, elections are affected by rising global tendencies linked to populism and immigration that seek to create walls between abstract groups like “us” and “them.” Many of the political ** Correspondence: Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa, Japan hiroto@sfc.keio.ac.jp; ** Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
119
Veneer House - ESSAY -
structures and geographical borders around which we have structured our notions of self seem to be deteriorating, so we must rely on grassroots action to create a new sense of community and purpose. In this indeterminate period, we must have an honest dialogue to establish a clear direction to a future we are working toward as a society. Narrow and technocratic responses to challenges of this scale are insufficient. While maintaining empathy for each individual life and their views, we can still construct a shared vision for the future of our community as a whole. 2. The Role of Architecture In light of the uncertainty described above, how should we define the role of architecture in defining and improving community? One idea is to shift the major focus of our field from the aesthetic qualities of buildings to their economic, environmental, and social performance. This would also have implications for how architects, critics, academics, and even prize committees evaluate architecture. In order to change architecture, we must change the methods by which architecture is produced, publicized, and evaluated. All of this implies that architectural education will also have to change. 2-1. Architecture in service of Economy, Environment, and Society Economically, the role of architecture in the modern city is clear, but the role of architect is somewhat harder to define. What does the architect add to the economic equation that is not already offered by contractors, developers, and realtors? Architects often focus on eliminating or mitigating unwanted externalities of development; we shape and clad buildings so as to make them sympathetic to the surrounding environment; we try to make them efficient in their use of materials and energy. But these respond to perceived social and environmental problems, as we will address presently. The question is: should the architect attempt to play a part in the ongoing economic development of the city, in addition to the spatial manifestation of that development? We believe so. The growth of the city cannot be considered in isolation from the movement of the global economy. Industrial development, economic revitalization and their economic effects are hugely important for how cities and rural areas change. These structural changes should be considered in tandem with the future demography of the world population. As internal and external migration increase, larger cities are becoming the only place where many people can earn money and have a fulfilling life. It seems continued population concentrations are inevitable, as people seek to enter the emerging global middle class, but have we studied this problem enough to know that? Given the scale of modernization and all of the cultural and spatial lenses through which it is filtered, it is difficult to say. What is certain is that the shape and direction of the global economy will have a significant impact on the built environment, and thus on the daily lives of people around the world. Architects should work with allied professionals, in planning, urban design, government, media, and business, to help ensure that the
120
built environment is contributing to the just distribution of resources throughout the built environment. This means taking a keen interest in economic development, transit, employment, and public health. Energy, ecology and technology can be considered as the primary constituents of environmental practices in architecture, each of which affects and changes our lives, spatially and physically. Our course, the energy efficiency of buildings with respect to lighting, heating, cooling, and other mechanical systems is a primary concern. Recently, more focus has been given the important issue of embodied energy in architecture. We must continue to measure and work to reduce the energy used in the production, transportation, and assembly of building materials. This is where technology comes in; by harness digital fabrication and intelligent logistics services, we can reduce the impact of architecture on the environment while providing increased design and construction flexibility. The social role of architecture has always long been a topic of public debate in the profession, but we must work to extend the benefits of architecture to all corners of society, not just those who can afford to commission architects themselves. Recovery from disastrous situations, be they social or natural, is a pressing need that architecture can help to address today. Natural disasters have a larger proportional effect on people in developing countries, on those who do not have resources to provision for disaster prevention and response (Kreimer 2001) (Yamamura 2015). Developed countries have their own difficulties, as the political effects of migrants in European cities have demonstrated. When one considers that climate change will increase the number of natural disasters, and also the number of migrants, then the inseparability of these categories become obvious (McCarthy et al. 2001). It is then clear that, if we seek to meaningfully contribute to the resolution on these problems, architects must simultaneously address economic, social, and environmental challenges. Ignoring these responsibilities, even in part, will degrade the status of our profession and possibly bring about catastrophic failure in the future built environment. And only by addressing all of the above challenges, not only those that are explicitly environmental, can we achieve true sustainability. 2-2. Reacting to Unpredictable Situations with Architecture As we have discussed, in order to construct a sustainable future for society, we must recover a sense of collective imagination and action. However, it has become imperative to allow space in society for those with unconventional identities and circumstances to make their individual voices heard. If we are to pursue our hopes and desires both individually and collectively, then we must overcome the perceived binary conflict between the individual and the collective. Therefore, action should be organized in a relatively non-hierarchical way, from the ground up, allowing each individual to make a contribution suited to their capabilities. A sincere effort based on honest feeling is the foundation of any critical or speculative attempt to revise our relationship with architecture and the city.
121
At least in developed countries, our daily needs are increasingly provided for by impersonal institutions like the state or large corporations, but we are still obliged to work together spontaneously in extreme situations. In the case of natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, floods, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, etc., people commonly come the aid of strangers, and immediately realize that mutual aid is the best path to preserve the stability and civility of society, even when one’s individual needs are taken care of. Architecture has a role to play in the aftermath of natural disasters as well. When homes, schools, and places of work destroyed in disasters, they also interrupt the functions that took place their and delay the recovery of the community. It is essential to prepare alternative places to live, work, and gather quickly after a disaster, but resources are limited. Because of the lack of availability of skilled labor in these situations, a self-built construction methodology should be investigated and promoted. We believe that, like disaster relief coordination and logistics efforts, disaster relief architecture can be revolutionized with the application of digital technologies. Recently, structural engineers and architects have begun to explore the power of iterative computational and parametric design to test large numbers of spatial and tectonic alternatives. Computers, web-based databases, and social networks have also enabled designers to create imaginative virtual spaces and speculative proposals that regularly feature in academic and professional publications. While these techniques undoubtedly provide many benefits, this change in the process of realizing spatial ideas has had extensive effects on the prevailing notion of professional responsibility and agency. Architecture has, to an extent, become distant from the people it is intended to serve. Though architects are aware of the most pressing issues of society, they find it increasingly difficult to break out of the narrow professional channels of specialization that they fall into. It has become easier to restrict oneself within a border, however vague, then to extend oneself into adjacent fields and difficult professional situations. The barriers to this action are not just disciplinary subgroups like “health care architecture” or “residential architect,” but also notions of speculative and academic practice that tend to limit the interaction of the architect with those outside their immediate professional sphere. Rather than define the role of the architect by a set of pre-determined capabilities, we should define ourselves based on a set of issues or challenges in the world at large that we intend to address. Our notions of the status of the client are as badly in need of revision as those of the architect. In particular, the client should not be regarded as an individual that approaches the architect. Architects need to be active in the communities they serve before a specific commission materializes. This is particularly clear with regard to the above example of disaster relief architecture. The predominant form of architectural commission today, like professional specialization itself, seems to bolster self-defensive notions and a protective sense of ownership of space. If we seek to create more equitable access to space, and foster a sense of community and mutual responsibility for its maintenance, we need to create new ways for clients and community stakeholders to participate in the archi-
122
tectural process. In particular, we should encourage people use their body to examine how they can physically contribute to the construction process and, together with others, to forge a collective sense of ownership of their architecture. With the above in mind, this paper attempts to present modest but realistic and impactful ideas to address the above challenges through architecture. 3. Veneer House Project The Veneer House Project began in the wake of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. The disaster displaced tens of thousands of people and destroyed buildings along the coast of northeast Japan. (Fig. 1) After witnessing this disaster, we resolved to find a way to ameliorate some of this damage through architecture. The rebuilding efforts in the affected area were a priority, and a number of large scale building and town reconstruction projects were initiated by local and national level government agencies. Fig. 01 Thus, rather than focus our contribution on the design of large scale buildings, it seemed that a greater impact could be made by helping to simplify and expedite the construction of small scale buildings. In the wake of the 2011 disaster, our laboratory at Keio University in Japan began developing a strong and flexible structural system based on Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) routed plywood components. This system allows a structural frame to be assembled quickly without advanced tools or a prior knowledge of architecture. Given the abnormally high demand for contractors and construction workers during the rebuilding efforts after the disaster, this construction system proved helpful in reducing the time and labor costs. The system also requires less specialized equipment than conventional building, and large portions of the construction can proceed without any power tools at all. Moreover, the involvement of final users in the construction process engenders a close relationship between the user and the architecture, thereby increasing mutual attachment. There is a promising and inherent potential in the active use of self-built structures after completion. Creating a sense of ownership over a building is akin to creating a sense of civic duty for the creation and maintenance of spaces, public and private. 3-1. Embodiment Design and Self-Built Architecture The first Veneer House, intended to the test these suppositions, was realized in the village of Mina-
123
misanriku, Miyagi, Japan in 2012. (Fig. 2) Minamisanriku sustained significant damage in the 2011 disaster, which left the community in need of a place to gather and recover their shared identity and resolve to overcome the damage. The program included a meeting space as well as a public bathing facility. Because the building was an inherently public undertaking, and one that everyone in the town was aware of and committed to, it was an ideal staging ground for an experiment in collaborative construction. Because the small, prefabricated plywood components used in the design were lightweight and wieldy enough to be held by one or two people, many Fig. 02 locals felt comfortable participating in the construction. The simple assembly process reduced the amount of time needed on site, compared with conventional construction, which also reduced the time burden on citizen participants to an acceptable level. Though imperfect, this was an auspicious beginning to our investigations into self-build construction. In the field of architecture, so-called embodiment design tends to be associated with self-built methodologies. Encouraging more people to construct buildings by themselves for recovery projects after natural disasters is one such example of embodiment design, as is monodzukuri ‘fabrication.’ In part, this is also a manifestation of a critical attitude responding to our overreliance on advanced technologies at the expense of human contact with the construction process, even for those in the profession. This itself is linked to an uneasiness with the widening reach of technology in our everyday lives and the acceleration of related social changes. We should in no way seek to turn back the clock or align ourselves with Luddism. Even so, we should take such concerns seriously, and examine the effects of the alienation of the public from the process of construction and design on the experience of the built environment. The Veneer House Project seeks to implement advanced fabrication technologies, not to mystify or exclude the public, but to simplify the construction process and thus open it to everyone. 3-2. Logistical and Material Sustainability of Engineered Wood In 2013, our Lab realized another structure, the Maeamihama Veneer House, in the disaster stricken Ishinomaki area of north-east Japan. (Fig. 3) The project included a meeting space and storage area for local fishermen, who themselves constructed the building in the afternoons after fishing in the morning. For this project, the Fig. 03 construction process was illustrated in advance with a manual complete with diagrams. This functioned as a kind of informal construction documents package, allowing the fisherman to reference and fully understand the process. The project not only helped restore the sense
124
of community that was damaged by the disaster, but helped the fisherman in their daily livelihood. As described above, these projects functioned in social and economic dimensions, but they also involved an environmental strategy. The use of digital fabrication technology and a simplified construction system can reduce waste and mechanical equipment use on site. For an oceanside site like that of the Maeamihama Veneer House, and for other sensitive sites, this can be an important factor. More importantly, both projects used engineered wood products made from local forest thinnings. These projects help promote the resumption of forestry activities in the area, which is a renewable and sustainable method of material production, if properly managed. Indeed, we believe material selection to be of primary importance to the Veneer House environmental strategy. In the future, the relationship between design, construction, and local natural resource reserves will become critical in evaluating the environmental importance of buildings. We must think across multiple scales, including about how precious resources like rare earth minerals as well renewable materials like timber can be most effectively used. Logistical efficiency, a factor of the weight and proximity of materials, must be considered alongside embodied energy, extraction costs, and material durability. Considering the group of concerns listed above, wood is an ideal material for building construction. Not only is material affordable and renewable, it also sequesters carbon from the atmosphere and thus combats the effects of climate change. It can also be produced in many locations, meaning that transport efficiency is likely to be high. Our team at Keio University uses engineered wood products such as plywood and LVL (Laminated Veneer Lumber) to enhance the usage of timber and promote forestry as a source of sustainable employment. Furthermore, engineered wood products can be made using forest thinnings, rather than clear cutting or cutting of old growth forest as is sometimes required when using natural timbers of large dimension. 3-3. Traditional Techniques Simplified with Digital Technology For us, the use of wood has also opened a door to another important resource: the accumulated wisdom of carpenters and craftspeople. The study of wood joinery systems, in particular, have helped us to increase the efficiency and applicability of the Veneer House system. In the earlier Minamisanriku and Maeamihama projects, we used a notch cut system that, while easy enough to assemble, still required the use of a crane to place preassembled plywood beams. Furthermore, the shapes for the initial Veneer House at Minamisanriku, which had to be cut on a table saw rather than a CNC router, did not take full advantage the flexibility and accuracy of digital fabrication. Though a CNC router was employed in the Maeamihama Veneer House, it was not used to full effect. The next innovation in the development of the Veneer House project was the introduction of wedgelocked joinery into the system. Using traditional Japanese joinery techniques as a precedent, our lab at
125
Fig. 04
Keio University developed a way to create rigid assemblies of plywood ribs and structural panels, held together by plywood wedges. (Fig. 4) The updated systems were lighter and easier to assemble than previous iterations, and a crane was no longer required, even to construct the roof. In conventional carpentry, joinery is a laborious process involving the hand finishing of each joint with chisels. Because the Veneer House assemblies are composed only of flat components, the CNC router can cut the all components needed for construction, including wedges and complex joints. Additionally, engineered wood products have fine tolerances and, due to cross lamination of layers of wood grain, they resist bending due to weather exposure. The resulting system was robust enough to function as a complete structural frame, and yet simple enough to allow anyone to participate in construction. (Fig. 5) In fact, the assembly of the revised structural frame does not require the use of glue, nails, or powertools of any kind. The modular design of panels, constrained as it is by the standard dimensions of plywood sheets, also ensures that components are portable and wieldy. (Fig. 6)
Fig. 05
Fig. 06
The Cogon Day School, built in 2014 on Bohol Island in the Fig. 08 Philippines, was the first Veneer Fig. 07 House project to fully employ this digital fabrication system. (Fig. 7 & 8) The school building is a first for the small village of 700 people.
126
The village was affected by a severe 2013 Bohol earthquake and Typhoon Haiyan, and the project helped to catalyze their recovery. The structural frame was assembled in the course of only two days, including workshops for local student who would later use the school. Some participants we as young as kindergarten age, but all could participate in the workshop with the aid of scale models and mockups. (Fig. 9) Older children and other adults from around the village helped to complete the structural frame and to clad the exterior in local materials. By involving students and their parents in the construction and even the design of the structure they would later inhabit, the project forged an intimate relationship between building and user. Based on our experience in Japan, we believed that broad community participation would create a sense of ownership and agency that would strengthen the will of the community to maintain the building and perhaps go on to collectively address other needs. In particular, we felt that the experience would be a lasting one for the children, and perhaps have some long term impact on them.
Fig. 09
Fig. 10
For the Cogon Veneer House, fabrication as well as construction was carried out locally. Components were CNC routed at a fabrication lab at Bohol Island State University using locally produced plywood sheets. Only data was prepared in Japan and sent to the Philippines, and no materials had to be shipped internationally, illustrating the logistic efficiency the system can achieve. Because of the ease and speed with which the Veneer House system can be implemented, and because of its ambition to stitch torn communities together, disaster relief applications became a main Fig. 11 focus of our work. The Manawhari Learning Center (2013) addressed flooding conditions in the rural Ayeyarwady region of Myanmar. (Fig. 10) The building comprises a flexible classroom space and a veranda for the use of local children, many of who also participated in construction. The Charikot Veneer House (2015) was built in Nepal in response to severe earthquakes occurring earlier that year. (Fig. 11) The flexible and lightweight wood construction system performs better in seismic events than the static and heavy stone masonry buildings common in the region.
127
3-4. Assemble/Disassemble; Flexibility and Adaptability In addition to ease of assembly, the Veneer House systems also allows for easy disassembly. In the Charikot Veneer House, the entire structural frame was assembled in a factory as a test, before being dismantled and moved to the site to be assembled once again. (Fig. 12) More recently, this ease of disassembly has been exploited in a number of temporary pavilions most notably the Veneer Beach Houses. Every summer in Japan, umi-no-ie, or beach houses, are erected along many popular beaches in Japan. These are used as restaurants, music venues, or other temporary venues for the summer festivities. in 2015, we completed the Veneer Beach House in Shichigahama, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. (Fig. 13) Shichigahama beach, formerly a major tourist attraction, is located in the region most affected by the 2011 earthquake and tsunami. This Beach House serves as a venue for concerts and other festivities, helping to bring vitality back to the local community. The second Veneer Beach House, built in 2017 in Higashihama near Enoshima Island, Japan, houses a clinic and office for lifeguards, as well as a temporary radio station. (Fig. 14) The Veneer House system makes it easy to assemble and disassemble the structures each summer, and store the flat components in a small space during the rest of the year. Additionally, because there are no nails are screws used in the assembly, there is no chance of losing nails in the sand and endangering beach visitors. With these beach houses, the number of kinds of pieces required for assembly is less than ten, which greatly simplifies and accelerates the construction process. (Fig. 15) Compared with the first Minamisanriku Veneer House which required more than 100 kinds of pieces, the beach house assembly is less complex and is proceeds with fewer mistakes. Veneer House types with smaller number of components and fewer types of components are most suitable for applications in which the structure will be dismantled and reassembled several times. These components can be easily replaced or even reused in other ways.
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
128
3-5. Developing the Joint System to Accommodate Local Cladding The Veneer Beach Houses also include a flush joinery system, the latest development in the progression of the Veneer House technology, which leaves the exterior finished surface of the structural frame smooth. (Fig. 16) This allows exterior cladding to be fixed to the frame without the use of an additional substructure. In the case of the Veneer Beach House, a large custom tarp is stretched over the extent of the frame, providing adequate weather protection in the summer months.
Fig. 16
With the flush joint, other forms of membranes can easily be fixed on the exterior of the structural frame, including regionally sourced materials like amakan woven bamboo used earlier Veneer Houses in Myanmar and the Philippines. Although the underlying structural technology and joint details can be applied to structural frames of various shapes and dimensions, we are conscious that the Veneer House system still represents a new and thus unusual or foreign construction method for people in most contexts. Making provisions for the application of local cladding materials helps to integrate these structures into varied contexts. We benefit by learning from the accumulated knowledge of the community how best to protect the structure from local conditions, and we also believe this helps the community develop a relationship with the building. Using local materials as an exterior finish also allows local people to maintain the building continuously by themselves, protecting the comparatively durable veneer structure on the interior. This hybridization of local techniques and global technology is one promising direction in the future architecture. 3-6. Agile Architecture The agility of the Veneer House system, both in production and construction, is one of its principle strengths. Given the pace of change in contemporary living and working conditions, we feel that Veneer House can make a contribution to a wider range of situations than we have, or even could, anticipate. Even the notion of permanent architectural solutions may come to seem outdated, as temporary and flexible forms of housing are desired or demanded by circumstance. Economic, social, and environmental problems will continue to be those we are most interested in ad-
129
dressing. With climate change, natural disaster, and the refugee crisis continuing into the foreseeable future, there may be more need than ever for temporary and flexible architectural solutions. At the same time, we have attempted to experiment with the Veneer House system in entirely new contexts. As part of an ongoing relationship between Keio University and the Polytechnic University of Milan, we have constructed pavilions in Vis, Croatia (Fig. 17) and Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia. (Fig. 18) Each has been a chance for students from both countries to interact with local craftspeople and citizens, making the construction and use of each pavilion a change for cultural interchange. It has also been a chance for us to experiment with structural system itself; the open, column grid system in the Slovenj Gradec Veneer House does not require shear walls. At an even smaller scale, our lab at Keio University has developed a series of kiosks and booths used for both temporary and permanent installation. We erected a temporary kiosk in the earthquake stricken Japanese city of Kumamoto, which was used for a local event after the disaster. (Fig. 19) We have also deployed temporary structures at beaches for summer festivities, and in various exhibitions and industry events dealing with wooden architecture and digital fabrication. Finally, we have created a series of interior booths that can be assembled inside offices to create private spaces for conversation or individual work. (Fig. 20) We believe the flexibility of the system makes it ideal for augmenting the ever changing interior landscape of the contemporary, open plan office. In each of these applications, the participation of the users in the construction process is an integral part of the system. Also, by distributing these booths kits in the marketplace and keeping a large stock of kits in storage, we hope to be able to offer as many temporary rest spaces as possible in the case of an unpredicted disasters.
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
As Veneer House technology continues to develop, the quantity and variety of its potential applications grows apace. The agility of the technology helps it to adapt and grow along with the changing demand and conditions we have come to expect. What is most crucial, we believe, is maintaining an empathetic stance toward the built environment and the communities that inhabit it. Only by first focusing on the underlying social, economic, and environmental Fig. 20
130
challenges before use can we develop and apply this technology to its highest form. 4. Conclusion In the history of Japanese architecture and construction, people worked together to build each community member’s house in a village in turn. This was a collaborative working system based on mutual aid in a small and autonomous community called ‘Yui.’ By this method, people could complete a large amount of construction work that could not be done alone. This type of working system promotes mutual understanding and respect among the community members and sense of ownership of the community itself through collaboration. The Veneer House building system tries to realize a contemporary version of Yui by providing a simple building method by which any and everyone can work together to provide a place for themselves. Is has been our observation that self-built structures create a strong sense of unity among the participants, a sentiment that extends to the building itself. Committing to build something collaboratively fosters a sense of ownership for each person and collaborative work can forge a new sense of unity in a community recovering from a calamity. It is the ambition of the Veneer House project to simultaneously promote both a notion of a community around a building, and an individual sense of commitment to it. Mutual understanding occurs not only between community members, but also between the local people of the construction site and us. Using local materials and techniques helps us understand the different cultural backgrounds we encounter, and create a sense of empathy that extends beyond any one culture, time, or place.
131
CITATIONS 1. Kreimer, Alcira. “Social and Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters.” International Geology Review, vol. 43, no. 5, 2001, pp. 401–405., doi:10.1080/00206810109465021. 2. Yamamura, Eiji. “The Impact of Natural Disasters on Income Inequality: Analysis Using Panel Data during the Period 1970 to 2004.” International Economic Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, 2015, pp. 359–374., 10.1080/10168737.2015.1020323. 3. McCarthy, James J. “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.” Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001, www.ipcc.ch/ ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=450. BIBLIOGRAPHY de Waal, Frans. “The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society” Kinokuniyashoten, no. 6, 2017, p. 128 Kobayashi, Hiroto et al. “Rethinking Resilience, Adaptation and Transformation in a Time of Change 1st ed.” no. 1, 2017, Springer, pp. 365-385 Kreimer, Alcira. “Social and Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters.” International Geology Review, vol. 43, no. 5, 2001, pp. 401–405., doi:10.1080/00206810109465021. Yamamura, Eiji. “The Impact of Natural Disasters on Income Inequality: Analysis Using Panel Data during the Period 1970 to 2004.” International Economic Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, 2015, pp. 359–374., 10.1080/10168737.2015.1020323. McCarthy, James J. et al. “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.” Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001, www.ipcc. ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=450.
132
AWARD 2012 Inspirations Award / contract Magazine Practice-Based Category Award Minamisanriku Veneer House “NPO Gyoryu-no-yu“ 痥 㔐 加勞崞欽؝ؙٝ٦ٕ 傈劤加勞ꫬ㡪䎃㔚⡤鸬さ⠓ 加勞崞欽暴ⴽ颣 笨嵋ٖزأ؍ذصُى؝٦آ The 18th Wood Utilization Competition Japan Wood Youth Group Special Prize Maemihama Veneer House 2015 Invitational Tournament International Ecology Design Award / MILANO EXPO 2015 Best Design for Ecological Architecture 最佳生态建筑设计奖 Manawhari Veneer House 2015 Invitational Tournament International Ecology Design Award / MILANO EXPO 2015 Best Design for Ecological Architecture 最佳生态建筑设计奖 Cogon Day School
前網浜ベニヤハウス 皆で、早く、安く、簡単に。 ―ベニヤによる構法― 2011年に東日本を襲った津波によって被害を受けた漁村のコミュニティのための、漁業用倉庫兼集会所。漁 村の住民によって建設された。 漁村の住民=建設の素人による施工のため、簡単に建設できるシステムを考案する必要があった―ベニヤの 三六板(910x1820mmボード)を無駄のないよう455mmのモジュールのパーツに分割し、 それらに切込み(ノ ッチ) をCNCルーターにより施す。 そのノッチを相互に差挟むことで柱・梁を構成する。1つのパーツの大きさ は、大人ひとりで楽に持ち運べる大きさとした。 どこにでもある安価な素材で、誰にで も簡単に、素早く建設ができる。
fishing port
自ら協力しあって建設することで、愛着を持って建築が受け入れられる。
断面図
平面図
ベニヤで組み立てられた漁村の小さな倉庫が、新たな建築の可能性を示唆する。
1:200
1:200
配置図 1:2000
910
②パネル組立
Ძ᧓
ⅰ.Y1の基礎梁
3.補強材の固定
Ჰ᧓
ⅱ.梁の補強
ᰕ
合板 18mm厚 90x460 (mm) 288枚
2枚
②パネル組立
②パネル組立
1.基礎梁の組み立て
4枚
4枚
4枚
合板 18mm厚 225x460 (mm) 72本
6.柱の組立てと補強材固定
Წ᧓
ⅲ.柱の組立て (Y3/Y4)
2枚
2枚
2枚
2枚
コーススレッド 51mm 1440本
コーススレッド 32mm 720本
1820
2枚
12枚
12枚
SC5
SC5
[完成図] ー全部で12か所(両側含め)
※片側の柱はまだ組み立てないこと 基礎に緊結してから組み立てる
SC2
SC5
ーY2/Y3/Y4/Y5共通 ーY1/Y6の外側の下の補強材 のみLVL角材40x90
ᑠᒇ⤌
LB1
SC5
C9
C12
SC3
SF1
SC5
F1 SF2
組み立てる
90
小屋組みの完成
合板補強材(下側に合わせる)
225
SF1
合板補強材
90
LB1
上と下の補強材は裏と表の両側 の2枚で補強して下さい
C14
C11
SC3
合板補強材(上側に合わせる) 460
LVLには51㎜を、合板には32㎜のビスを10本ずつ打ってください
C13 SC5
SC3
SC5
SC5
C13
C10
SC3
SC3
C14
SC3
F1 SC2
パ―ツを切り出す CNCルーターを使用
SC5
SC3 C10 SC5
SC3
133
2枚
4枚
[完成図 Y1]
SC3
SC5 C11 SC3
SC5
C12
C9
SC3
SC3
建設マニュアル・・ ・ 建設の全ての工程と手順を図示することで、 始めて建設に参加する人でも簡単に建設の過程を理解できる。
The Wood Design Awards 2015 / Canadian Wood Council Citation Award Veneer House - Cogon Day School ؐ؎ؠرسحٝ颣 ؐ؎ؠرسحٝ颣 麊㌀✲㽷 ٓ؎؎ؠرٕ؎ةأؿٝ鿇 䒉眠٥瑞ⴓꅿ صك،زؙؑآٗفأؐع Japan Wood Design Award 2015 Wood Design Award Steering Committee Lifestyle Design Category, Architecture and Space Veneer House Project ؐ؎ؠرسحٝ颣 ؐ؎ؠرسحٝ颣 麊㌀✲㽷 ٓ؎؎ؠرٕ؎ةأؿٝ鿇 䪮遭٥灇瑔ⴓꅿ صك،زؙؑآٗفأؐع Japan Wood Design Award 2015 Wood Design Award Steering Committee Lifestyle Design Category, Technology and Research Veneer House Project ؐ؎ؠرسحٝ颣 ؐ؎ؠرسحٝ颣 麊㌀✲㽷 ع٦؎ؠرٕؿزٝ鿇 ؛صُى؝٦ّءٝⴓꅿ չ麣欵加֮ך劢勻鋅ְַկ պ .84加ךٙ٦فحّءؙ Japan Wood Design Award 2019 Wood Design Award Steering Committee Communication Field “Seeing the Future of Hokkaido Wood” -- MWS Wood Workshop
șȋǢȏǦǹƱƸ ベニアハウスは、合板から切出したパーツにより、建物の構造フレームをつくる構法です。 特殊な技術、工具が不要なセルフビルドを可能とするシステムで、欲しい人が欲しい場で生産ができる、つまり拠点型の生産/供給ではなく、分散型に展開 できる建築です。
データさえ送れば、 どこでも生産可能 拠点生産ではなく、必要とする個人が生産できる
合板は寸法が精確で加工もしやいだけでなく、間伐材 を材料とする環境に優しい、廉価で、世界中で手に入り やすい素材
ベニアハウスの構造体は合板のパーツのみ 板のため、 コンパクトに保管・運送が可能
それぞれのパーツは人が運べるサイズ 重機が不要、人が協力しあう単純作業
金槌など、 シンプルな道具のみで、知識・技術がなくとも 参加できるプラモデルのような組立て方
部分的な交換、増改築・解体もしやすく、建築を一度つく ると動かせない固定的なものから、柔軟で可変性の高 いものに
株式会社小林・槇デザインワークショップ 〒150-0033 東京都渋谷区猿楽町30-3 ツインビル代官山A-402 tel: 03 6415-7980 mail: kmdw@kmdw.com
134
PROFILE 㼭卌խ⽆➂խֿ׃װלխהמ 吳䒭⠓爡㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦فحّءؙխ➿邌 4LJENPSF 0XJOHT BOE .FSSJMM --1խ傈劤➿邌 䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕㣐㷕ꤍ佟瘻٥ً؍ر،灇瑔猰խ侄䱇 F NBJM IJSPUP!LNEX DPN 耵娖 㷕娖
吳䒭⠓爡傈䒉鏣鎘խ鏣鎘鿇 4UFWFO +BDPCTFO "SDIJUFDUT /FX :PSL 64"խ䒉眠鏣鎘 4JS /PSNBO 'PTUFS BOE 1BSUOFST 'SBOLGVSU (FSNBOZխ䒉眠鏣鎘 ❨鿪㣐㷕㣐㷕ꤍ䊨㷕灇瑔猰䒉眠㷕խ㼔余⸔䩛ծ ずٍؗٝأػխ 鎘歗⸔䩛 䧭㸜鸡䕎瀉劍㣐㷕闌䌌խꬊ䌢 )BSWBSE 6OJWFSTJUZ (SBEVBUF 4DIPPM PG %FTJHO 5FBDIJOH 'FMMPX ず㣐㷕ꤍ 5FBDIJOH 'FMMPX ず㣐㷕ꤍ 7JTJUJOH "TTPDJBUF 吳䒭⠓爡㼭卌٥圊؎ؠرٝٙ٦فحّءؙխ➿邌 4LJENPSF 0XJOHT BOE .FSSJMM --140.խ傈劤➿邌 䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕㣐㷕ꤍ佟瘻٥ً؍ر،灇瑔猰խⲤ侄䱇 .BTTBDIVTFUUT *OTUJUVUF PG 5FDIOPMPHZ 7JTJUJOH "TTPDJBUF 1SPGFTTPS 䣒䥯纏㞢㣐㷕㣐㷕ꤍ佟瘻٥ً؍ر،灇瑔猰խ侄䱇 6OJWFSTJUZ PG $BMJGPSOJB #FSLFMFZ $FOUFS GPS +BQBOFTF 4UVEJFT 7JTJUJOH 3FTFBSDIFS
❨鿪㣐㷕䊨㷕鿇䒉眠㷕猰 ⼼噟 ず㣐㷕ꤍ䊨㷕灇瑔猰䒉眠㷕㼔余 ⥜㡦铬玎⥜✪ )BSWBSE 6OJWFSTJUZ (SBEVBUF 4DIPPM PG %FTJHO ⥜㡦铬玎⥜✪ )BSWBSE 6OJWFSTJUZ (SBEVBUF 4DIPPM PG %FTJHO .BTUFS JO %FTJHO 4UVEJFT 㷕⡘《䖤 ز؎ٓـٕؿ灇瑔㆞يؚٓٗف㤺㷕ꆃ䖤גず㣐㷕ꤍ 7JTJUJOH 4DIPMBS ず㣐㷕ꤍ %PDUPS PG %FTJHO 1SPHSBN ⥜✪ծ %PDUPS PG %FTJHO 㷕⡘《䖤
项呓 ♧秷䒉眠㡦⯜鏩《䖤խ 䎃խ 剢 衼⡲ծ鎸✲ծ缺鏬ծ㾜爙 ⠓ծ ➭ך
$"4& 4FOEBJ .FEJBUIFRVF Ⱏ衼
ˎ1SPDFTTJOH *ODPNQMFUJPOˏ 1SFTUFMM )BSWBSE %FTJHO 4DIPPM 8PSLT PG :PVOE "SDIJUFDUT GSPN UIF )BSWBSE 6OJWFSTJUZ (SBEVBUF 4DIPPM PG %FTJHO +BQBO 箟衼 չةأؓؿ٦鏣鎘ׇך䕎馄넝㾴պ㜠デ 傈穗،٦ ٍثؙذؗ䎃 剢 傈〾 ˑ)BSWBSE %FTJHO 4DIPPM *OUFSWJFX XJUI %FBO 1FUFS ( 3PXF˒ B V 䎃 剢〾 $"4& 4FOEBJ .FEJBUIFRVF 㾜爙⠓ 䎃 剢 )BSWBSE %FTJHO 4DIPPM #PTUPO 6SCBO 3FWJUBMJ[BUJPO 5IF #JH %JH 㾜爙⠓ 䎃 剢 䣒䘔纏㞢㣐㷕
䨽㾩㷕⠓ 傈劤䒉眠㷕⠓ծ鿪䋐鎘歗㷕⠓
135
www.kmdw.com kmdw@kmdw.com
www.veneerhouse.com veneerhouse@kmdw.com
architecture.keio.ac.jp/lab/kobayashi/ 136