Careless Driving Requires the State to Provide the Vehicle was Operated…nner so as to Endanger, or be Likely to Endanger, a Person or Property
11/15/11 2:32 PM
Kenneth Vercammen & Associates A Law Office with Experienced Attorneys for Your New Jersey Legal Needs 2053 Woodbridge Ave. Edison NJ 08817 732-572-0500 1-800-655-2977 Personal Injury and Criminal on Weekends 732-261-4005
Princeton Area 68 South Main St. Cranbury, NJ 08512 By Appointment Only Toll Free 800-655-2977
Careless Driving Requires the State to Provide the Vehicle was Operated by the Defendant Carelessly or Without Due Caution and Circumspection, in a Manner so as to Endanger, or be Likely to Endanger, a Person or Property
Search Website
Kenneth Vercammen was the Middlesex County Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year
FOR POTENTIAL CLIENTS TO CONTACT US DURING NONBUSINESS HOURS, PLEASE FILL OUT THE FORM. Name:
Cell Phone:
E-Mail Address
The NJ Supreme Court held in State v Lutz 309 N.J. Super. 317 (App. Div. 1998) that merely because an accident took place a driver is not guilty of careless driving. The court wrote: "Finally, we find merit in defendant's contention that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of careless driving. We agree that http://www.njlaws.com/carelessdrivingproof.html?id=115&a=
If You Do Not Include a Complete EMail Address, Verizon will not Forward Your Contact Form to the Law Office. Details of the Case
Page 1 of 5
Careless Driving Requires the State to Provide the Vehicle was Operated…nner so as to Endanger, or be Likely to Endanger, a Person or Property
11/15/11 2:32 PM
the proofs established essentially that defendant was Agree involved in an accident which happened in the opposite lane of travel. In finding defendant guilty of careless driving, the Law Division judge stated: By typing " agree" into the box you are confirming that you wish to send your information to the Law Office of "The defendant quite clearly operated his vehicle Kenneth Vercammen carelessly, failed to exercise appropiate caution in the prevailing circumstances, and endangered both the persons in the other vehicle. These conclusory Change Image remarks, however, were insufficient to establish a Write the characters in the image careless driving violation. (It appears that both the above Municipal Court judge and the Law Division judge applied a res ipsa loquitur analysis in finding defendant guilty of careless driving. The doctrine of Submit Clear res ipsa loquitur, however, has no application in the determination of careless driving due to the quasicriminal nature of the proceeding in which the State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt all elements of the offense. See State v. Wenzel, 113 N.J. Super., 215, 216-18 (App. Div. 1971)(the mere Kenneth Vercammen was the fact of an "otherwise unexplained jackknifing" where Middlesex County Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year a tractor-trailer entering a construction area had jackknifed on the wet roadway, crossed into the opposite lane and broadsided another truck fatally injuring the truck's driver, did not establish that the defendant had been driving carelessly. The careless driving statute provides: [a] person who drives a vehicle on a highway carelessly, or without due caution and circumspection, in a manner so as to endanger, or be likely to endanger, a person or property, shall be guilty of careless driving. [N.J.S.A. 39:4-97.] Here, other than the accident itself, the State only presented defendant's statement that his vehicle began to slide on the wet highway and continued to do so when he tapped his brakes. Moreover, his apology was not an admission to driving carelessly, but merely a statement that his car had slid on the wet pavement. The State presented no evidence indicating that defendant had been speeding, driving too fast for the wet road conditions, distracted or otherwise driving without due caution and circumspection. Consequently, there was insufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for careless driving, and we reverse that conviction." State v Lutz , supra In State v. Wenzel, 113 N.J. Super. 215 (App. Div. http://www.njlaws.com/carelessdrivingproof.html?id=115&a=
Page 2 of 5
Careless Driving Requires the State to Provide the Vehicle was Operated…nner so as to Endanger, or be Likely to Endanger, a Person or Property
11/15/11 2:32 PM
1971) defendant was charged with careless driving when his tractor trailer jackknifed and struck another trailer. The State's only witness did not see the accident. There was no evidence defendant was speeding or that he drove without due caution or circumspection. However, both the municipal and county courts determined that an otherwise unexplained jackknifing was indicative of careless driving. The Appellate Division reversed, holding the res ipsa doctrine employed by the lower courts had no place in a quasi-criminal action for careless driving. The rationale of the Wenzel decision applies to this case. See also State v Roenicke 174 N.J. Super. 513 (Law Div 1980) Defendant was involved in a one-car accident which was not observed by the trooper or any other witness. The State failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he drove in a reckless manner. Defendant cannot be found guilty of reckless driving, and his conviction is set aside.
Minimum Mandatory Fines, Points, Jail and Penalties Relating to Selected Motor Vehicle Offenses Receive free NJ Laws Email newsletter with current laws and cases GO
Telephone Consultation Program
New Article of the Week
Meet with an experienced Attorney to handle your important legal needs. Please call the office to schedule a confidential "in Office" consultation. Attorneys are not permitted to provide legal advice by email.
Kenneth Vercammen's Law office represents individuals charged with criminal, drug offenses, and serious traffic violations throughout New Jersey. http://www.njlaws.com/carelessdrivingproof.html?id=115&a=
Page 3 of 5
Careless Driving Requires the State to Provide the Vehicle was Operated…nner so as to Endanger, or be Likely to Endanger, a Person or Property
11/15/11 2:32 PM
Our office helps people with traffic/ municipal court tickets including drivers charged with Driving While Intoxicated, Refusal and Driving While Suspended. Kenneth Vercammen was the NJ State Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year and past president of the Middlesex County Municipal Prosecutor's Association. Criminal and Motor vehicle violations can cost you. You will have to pay fines in court or receive points on your drivers license. An accumulation of too many points, or certain moving violations may require you to pay expensive surcharges to the N.J. DMV [Division of Motor Vehicles] or have your license suspended. Don't give up! The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen can provide experienced attorney representation for criminal motor vehicle violations. When your job or driver's license is in jeopardy or you are facing thousands of dollars in fines, DMV surcharges and car insurance increases, you need excellent legal representation. The least expensive attorney is not always the answer. Schedule an appointment if you need experienced legal representation in a traffic/municipal court matter. Our website provides information on traffic offenses we can be retained to represent people. Our website also provides details on jail terms for traffic violations and car insurance eligibility points. Car insurance companies increase rates or drop customers based on moving violations.
Contact the Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C. at 732-572-0500 for an appointment. The Law Office cannot provide legal advice or answer legal questions over the phone or by email. Please call the Law office and schedule a confidential "in office" consultation. The Law Office now accepts payment by American Express, Visa and Master Card. .
http://www.njlaws.com/carelessdrivingproof.html?id=115&a=
Page 4 of 5
Careless Driving Requires the State to Provide the Vehicle was Operated‌nner so as to Endanger, or be Likely to Endanger, a Person or Property
11/15/11 2:32 PM
Disclaimer This web site is purely a public resource of general New Jersey information (intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date). It is not intended be a source of legal advice, do not rely on information at this site or others in place of the advice of competent counsel. The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen complies with the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct. This web site is not sponsored or associated with any particular linked entity unless specifically stated. The existence of any particular link is simply intended to imply potential interest to the reader, inclusion of a link should not be construed as an endorsement. Š 2011 Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.
http://www.njlaws.com/carelessdrivingproof.html?id=115&a=
Page 5 of 5