Proof of Operation of a Motor Vehicle in a DWI Case
12/8/11 12:29 PM
Kenneth Vercammen & Associates A Law Office with Experienced Attorneys for Your New Jersey Legal Needs 2053 Woodbridge Ave. Edison NJ 08817 732-572-0500 1-800-655-2977 Personal Injury and Criminal on Weekends 732-261-4005
Princeton Area 68 South Main St. Cranbury, NJ 08512 By Appointment Only Toll Free 800-655-2977
Proof of Operation of a Motor Vehicle in a DWI Case The State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant was driving while intoxicated. State v. Grant, 196 N.J. Super. 470, 477 (App. Div. 1984). N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 specifically applies to a person who operates a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . . (Emphasis added). The term operate must be given broad construction. State v. Morris, 262 N.J. Super. 413, 417 (App. Div. 1993). Actual operation is not required to satisfy the element. Ibid.; State v. Sweeney, 40 N.J. 359, 360-61 (1963). Operation may be proved by any direct or circumstantial evidence 足 as long as it is competent and meets the requisite standards of proof. State v. George, 257 N.J. Super. 493, 497 (App. Div. 1992). Operation may be proved by actual observation of the defendant driving while intoxicated, State v. Prociuk, 145 N.J. Super. 570, 573 (Law Div. 1976); by observation of the defendant in or out of the vehicle under circumstances indicating that the defendant had been driving while intoxicated, State v. Mulcahy, 107 N.J. 467, 476 (1987); Morris, supra, 262 N.J. Super. at 419-20; Sweeney, supra, 77 N.J. Super. 512, 521 http://www.njlaws.com/proofofvehicledwicase.html?id=982&a=
Search Website
Kenneth Vercammen was the Middlesex County Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year
FOR POTENTIAL CLIENTS TO CONTACT US DURING NONBUSINESS HOURS, PLEASE FILL OUT THE FORM. Name:
Cell Phone:
E-Mail Address If You Do Not Include a Complete EMail Address, Verizon will not Forward Your Contact Form to the Law Office. Details of the Case
Page 1 of 4
Proof of Operation of a Motor Vehicle in a DWI Case
(App. Div. 1962); State v. Witter, 33 N.J. Super. 1, 57 (App. Div. 1954); or by defendantยนs admission, State v. Hanemann, 180 N.J. Super. 544, 547 (App. Div.) (affirming defendantยนs conviction based upon his admission that he had been driving earlier that night after the police found his empty overturned vehicle on the highway), certif. denied, 88 N.J. 506 (1981); State v. Dickens, 130 N.J. Super. 73, 78 (App. Div. 1974) (affirming defendantยนs conviction based on his admission to drinking and driving when the police woke him up in his parked car on Interstate 287); State v. Guerrido, 60 N.J. Super. 505, 509 (App. Div. 1960) (affirming defendantยนs conviction based on the testimony of two witnesses that he was intoxicated and his admission to police that he had been driving after his car was found buried full length in some shrubbery and lilac bushes.)
12/8/11 12:29 PM
Agree By typing " agree" into the box you are confirming that you wish to send your information to the Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen
Change Image Write the characters in the image above Submit
Clear
Kenneth Vercammen was the The Appellate Division in State v Ebert 377 N.J. Middlesex County Bar Municipal Super. 1 (App. Div. 2005) recently detailed the proof Court Attorney of the Year required by the state. 1. The state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. "Operation" may be proved by actual observation of the defendant driving while intoxicated, by observation of the defendant in or out of the vehicle under circumstances indicating that the defendant had been driving while intoxicated, or by the defendant's admission. 2. Defendant's .27 percent BAC, along with the fact that she had driven to the parking lot of a restaurant on a major state highway, Route 46 in Denville, was sufficient to sustain her conviction for reckless driving. Conclusion If charged with Driving While Intoxicated, immediately schedule an in-office appointment with a trial attorney. Don't rely on a real estate attorney, public defender or a family member who simply attended law school. When your driving privileges and ability to drive to work is on the line, hire an experienced attorney.
Minimum Mandatory Fines, Points, Jail http://www.njlaws.com/proofofvehicledwicase.html?id=982&a=
Page 2 of 4
Proof of Operation of a Motor Vehicle in a DWI Case
12/8/11 12:29 PM
and Penalties Relating to Selected Motor Vehicle Offenses Receive free NJ Laws Email newsletter with current laws and cases GO
Telephone Consultation Program
New Article of the Week
Meet with an experienced Attorney to handle your important legal needs. Please call the office to schedule a confidential "in Office" consultation. Attorneys are not permitted to provide legal advice by email.
Kenneth Vercammen's Law office represents individuals charged with criminal, drug offenses, and serious traffic violations throughout New Jersey. Our office helps people with traffic/ municipal court tickets including drivers charged with Driving While Intoxicated, Refusal and Driving While Suspended. Kenneth Vercammen was the NJ State Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year and past president of the Middlesex County Municipal Prosecutor's Association. Criminal and Motor vehicle violations can cost you. You will have to pay fines in court or receive points on your drivers license. An accumulation of too many points, or certain moving violations may require you to pay expensive surcharges to the N.J. DMV [Division of Motor Vehicles] or have your license suspended. Don't give up! The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen can provide experienced attorney representation for criminal motor vehicle violations. When your job or driver's license is in jeopardy or you are facing thousands of dollars in fines, DMV surcharges and car insurance increases, you need excellent legal representation. The least expensive attorney is not always the answer. Schedule an appointment if you need experienced legal representation in a traffic/municipal court matter. Our website provides information on traffic offenses we can be retained to represent people. Our website also provides details on jail terms for traffic violations and car insurance eligibility points. Car insurance companies increase rates or drop customers based on moving violations.
Contact the Law Office of http://www.njlaws.com/proofofvehicledwicase.html?id=982&a=
Page 3 of 4
Proof of Operation of a Motor Vehicle in a DWI Case
12/8/11 12:29 PM
Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C. at 732-572-0500 for an appointment. The Law Office cannot provide legal advice or answer legal questions over the phone or by email. Please call the Law office and schedule a confidential "in office" consultation. The Law Office now accepts payment by American Express, Visa and Master Card. .
Disclaimer This web site is purely a public resource of general New Jersey information (intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date). It is not intended be a source of legal advice, do not rely on information at this site or others in place of the advice of competent counsel. The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen complies with the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct. This web site is not sponsored or associated with any particular linked entity unless specifically stated. The existence of any particular link is simply intended to imply potential interest to the reader, inclusion of a link should not be construed as an endorsement. Š 2011 Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.
http://www.njlaws.com/proofofvehicledwicase.html?id=982&a=
Page 4 of 4