Videl Oemry
Portfolio A R C H I T E C T U R E
A N D
U R B A N 2 0 1 2
-
D E S I G N : 2 0 1 6 . 1
S E L E C T E D
W O R K S
Videl Oemry Portfolio
A R C H I T E C T U R E
A N D
U R B A N 2 0 1 2
-
D E S I G N : 2 0 1 6 . 1
S E L E C T E D
W O R K S
Videl Oemry IAI Jl. Bojong Raya No.112 Bandung, West Java, INDONESIA 40212 m. +62 (0) 812 4116 2828 e. videloemry@gmail.com
Practice Current 2013 , 2014 , 2015, 2016
Pusat studi urban desain [PSUD] Center for Urban Design Studies (CUDS) Bandung, West Java
Architect & Urban Designer Learning and working on and as an architect and urban designers, handle various types of projects on different scales. Designing, develop it, do research and do analysis + studies and also some assessment for design framework strategies, etc. Include maintain the documents quality such as: substances, drawings, rendering, and graphics. Past 2009, 2010
PT. Tiga Dimensi Pertama Kebayoran Baru, DKI Jakarta 2008, 2009
Selia Cipta Bestari 5 Bandung, West Java
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
mnc Radio Networks: Global Radio Bandung Bandung, West Java
Education mid 2010 - early 2013
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG [ITB] Bandung, West Java
Architecture: Design Program
Mentors: Heru Wibowo Poerbo & Ahmad Rida Soemardi mid 2004 - early 2009
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI nASIONAL [ITENAS] Bandung, West Java
Architecture Mentors: Dwi Kustianingrum & Tecky Hendrarto
Skills Set CityEngine, ArcMAP, Indesign, Photoshop, SketchUp, AutoCAD, Lumion, ArchiCAD, ArtLantis, MS Office. For 2016, I’m intense with the CityEngine and Indesign software more often as working tools because of the necessary producing an Metropolitan/Megapolitan City Scale Master Planning and Urban Design Guidelines. I’m a fast learner and learning all the softwares individually. Once as a broadcaster, I used to plan every seconds of my broadcast program with team, elaborate the ideas and execute in a beautiful way, just like I did to all my work in architecture and urban designer up.
Publications & Awards 2016 Arsitek komunitas bandung (Bandung Community architect) Social contribution for a brighter future of Bandung Juara. 2015 Kota Pusaka Competition: Bogor Winner: 1st Place ‘Bogor: Kota Pusaka Teduh dalam Taman - Towards Indonesia 1st Ecopolis’ 2014 pasar baru revitalization Competition Winner: 2nd Place ‘Infinite One Stop Shopping Experience’ 2014 apartemen rakyat (People’s apartment) Choose as an architect (with team) to design 1 of 15 location in Bandung ‘Apartemen Rakyat: Bagus Rangin’ 2013 PUBLIC SPACE DYNAMIST IN THE CITY CENTER: LRT STATION AND PUBLIC LIBRARY IN MIRAMAR-PALAGUNA Jurnal Arsitektur, Rancang-Kota dan Arsitektur Lanskap SAPPK
Research & Findings
2016 Academic Research
• ArtePOLIS: Optimization of the Developed Regions Through the Development of Food Tourism with the Principle of Urban Acupuncture. 2013 - 2015 Pusat Studi Urban DesAin [psud] • • • • •
Building and Site Guidelines Studies on Kuala Kencana Freeport, Timika; Land Optimalization for TOD on MRT Station radius in DKI Jakarta Studies; Urban positives and negatives implication for Surabaya Monorail; Building Permit Regulation Review for DKI Jakarta Government; and Heritage Building Incentives and Disincentives Regulation for DKI Jakarta Government;
2012 Academic Research • Dampak Transit Oriented Development pada pergerakan kota di Hong Kong: Studi Pra Tesis. • Consumerism in Architecture; and, • Mamo (Adi Purnomo) - Fragment: Thinking, Methods, and Design Process.
Project by years sequence (start from upper left to right): 1. Bandung International Convention Hall 2. R Residence 3. H Residence 4. Dago Pojok: Tourism and Creative Economy Kampong - Community Action Plan 5. ITB Jatinangor Mosque Competition - Participant 6. Kuala Kencana Re-Master Plan and Urban Design Plan 7. Public Space Dynamist in The City Center: LRT Station and Public Library in Miramar-Palaguna - Master Thesis 8. Jakarta Garden City Master Planning 9. Mayapada Tower - TOD and Density Studies 10. International Finance Tower (IFC) 2 - TOD and Density Studies 11. Cikapundung Riverdeck 12. Jatinegara Rusunawa (Middle-low Apartment) - Participant 13. RTBL Bulungan 14. Urban Design Guidelines Improvement: Area Dalam Tembok Kotatua 15. BNI City Master Plan 16. Pasar Baru Competition - WINNER (Built) 17. Lombok Solar Farm 18. Surabaya Monorail Corridors 19. Landmark Urban Design Guidelines 20. KORPRI Housing Master Plan and Infrastructure Development 21. DKI Jakarta Block Plan Drawing Guidelines 22. Bandung People Apartment Program - Bagus Rangin 23. PT. Timah Industri Eco-Building 24. Taman Perdamaian Gate 25. Green Building Bandung Regulation 26. Gumul Park, Kediri 27. Tanimbar Tourism Master Plan 28. Bekasi Mosque - Participant 29. Heritage Cities Competition: Bogor - WINNER 30. DKI Jakarta Heritage Buildings Studies 31. ASEAN Secretariat Building Competition - Participant 32. Indonesia’s Integrated Resort Scheme 33. Mali-Alor Airport Competition - Participant 34. Bandung’s Villa and Non-Villa Building 35. Surabaya Skyline Development
Roles
Documents & Report
Presenter
Graphics & Rendering
Administrasion & Contrat
Construction Drawing
Schematic Design
Feasibility Studies
Regulation & Research
Chief/Team Leader
Survey
Projects
2012 2013 Architecture: Master Thesis
Image Source: http://southbeachqueen.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/img_9442.jpg
2012-2013 PUBLIC SPACE DYNAMIST IN THE CITY CENTER:
LRT STATION AND PUBLIC LIBRARY IN MIRAMAR-PALAGUNA Bandung, West Java
Master Thesis This design thesis aims to arouse dynamist on the movement of individuals in experiencing the diversity of quality space and social interaction. Concepts that exist in public space is applied to stimulate social potential and peculiarities on Miramar-Palaguna location in downtown Bandung. Stimulation of continuity created through the transition space between Alun-Alun with Cikapundung River, including the LRT Station, Public Library and the green open space, as a hub function and as the issues of urban development in the future. The diversity of this function will form a transitional space as a ‘place’ in the middle downtown solidity. With the flexibility and transparency of space as a design principle for achieving the stimulation orientation, effectiveness circulation via diverse paths will improve the experience quality of space. Connectivity of the axis were piled to be transformed into a new social orientation dinamisator at different elevation.
As a result of it’s physical condition, Palaguna referred as ‘bums’ in the city center. Infrastructure, congestion, parking, environmental degradation, street vendors, and poor pedestrians way, was an complex issues that are bound to tread. Based on research and analysis of the site carried out in the period August 2011 - July 2012, through verbal information (interview) that involving public figures and surrounding community.
To create an effective and efficient space for public libraries, open spaces, and the mass transit system is crucials. Bandung Mayor has set aside large amount of budgets, enough to meet the needs of Bandung’s citizen.
In 2012, the Bandung Mayor has allocate Rp 18 trillion, (equivalent to USD 1.6 billion) to implement Transportation Master Plan for the city of Bandung 2030, which includes the development of land assets in Miramar Palaguna with the funds allocated: Rp.1,5 billion (USD 1, 3 million) to revitalize the area by adding a new development. This design started from the ideas of function: public libraries, public green spaces, and the LRT station based on TOD system. TOD allignment itself is set to be built in two phases, the first phase will be the development of the first path, which will connect the North side, along the Cikapundung River towards Leuwi Panjang Bus Terminal on the South. Then the second phase will connect the East side and West of the city, where the location will be the second intersection of this line and creating a central hub in the heart of Bandung. Functions needs on each building typology has a fairly fundamental differences with each other. Super-imposed applied to be a solution to this problem, by integrating all of the components that are essential for every typology, and then set the connectivity, linkage, and encourage circulation in each function. With a number of studies that consists of building precedents related to various types of functions and typologies, a new order founded on a systematic character of human movement. In essence, the movement always has a main goal that we should be called destination, but in the process the movement always make the probability, that create a secondary destination before reaching the final destination. This opportunity can be created to provide a different experience from the spatial space, a new visual experience, as well as a new direction to create flexibility and intimacy of interaction in places like the so-called transition. The goals; is to motivate the movement itself. Every movement of the individual is unique, that’s why, accessibility creates variations that have potential. The diversity is reflected in the context of access to the site in the form of urban, with the forward movement of the scale of the city, such as the Great Mosque canonical axes, history and geography of the landscape, which will form the dimensions of space with more diversity in access, visual, and motion.
[3] New Functions + Re-inventing Downtown + Super Imposed + Linkage & Movements + Accessibilities , visual ‘focal’, & continuity circulation
By stacking each different programs, new compositions will produce the basic needs of the movement and maximizing connectivity to a whole new level. Combineing more than two activities can become an issues. This discomfort can be prevented by defining the basic aspects of each function, which later merged to become the ‘backbone’ of building circulation, where mobility, transition, and interacting interaction can occur. By defining the ‘circulation backbone’, the building itself will create a space that is more diverse with multiple access movement. To determine orientations, visual illusions applied as markers for stimulating sense of direction and destination by focusing on the elements of firmness, clarity, immediacy, and efficiency. The integration of this functionality will form a transitional space as a place in the massive downtown. With the flexibility and transparency of space, it will improve the quality of the experience of space.
#1 Flexibility Flexibility of access, is directed to be dynamic factor for users, to maximize the capacity of the space for eliminating the physical boundaries horizontally or vertically, namely not only moved linearly, but rather stimulates the possibility of changing lanes on the same or different elevations.
#2 Continuity Users have the potential to make the transition on every floor by stairs or ramp, without disturbing the visual orientation of its main destination.
#3 Visibilty Transparancy
#4 TTransition for Interaction
Solid-void in the inside of space, form the boundaries on the outside and inside the building became apparent.
Through three (3) previous principle, a space can be fused and transformed into a place to cross paths, meet up at a location that is formed by the system to form a communal space.
East Elevation [Front Facade]
North Elevation [Side Facade]
Movement are interpreted through the principle of connectivity, sustainability, flexibility, orientation, diversity, and transitional spaces that interrelated. Individuals will always have a goal to the end, but tend to have two options ie, primary and secondary direction, character, interests, efficient, and different levels of consciousness. So the human relationship with the architectural space can be redefined to form a meaningful dynamic places through public spaces in the city center.
2013 2014 Urban Design: Master Plan
Image Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/Ville_de_Batavia_c1780.jpg
2013-2014 Urban Design Guidelines :
kotatua Inner Wall West and North Jakarta, DKI Jakarta
The Oldest Dutch Cities in The World Clients Planning Area
Dinas Tata Ruang Jakarta 134 Hectares
“Ini Proyek Seumur Hidup (This is a Lifetime Project)� - Woerjantari K. Soedarsono That is the way to express involvement in this project. Kotatua itself marked the colonial history of the Dutch in the archipelago, with numbers of challenge and problem that continue to evolve over time. Guidance and direction in Urban Design Guidelines for Kotatua Inner Wall, focusing on 134 hectares planning area within the historic Batavia city fort area, which includes the preservation of various aspects in physical and non-physical (activity) development on a vast scale to architectural details. Various regional aspects, context, and environment issues were analyse to achieve a realistic and easy-toapply strategic planning .
Over the past 400 years, Kotatua Inner Wall has significantly changed. Kotatua Jakarta is the ground zero of Dutch Empire state capital, Batavia, which began as V.O.C second headquartes, the first international trading company in the world history ever record, by the Dutch royal as the biggest trading hub in Southeast Asia’s at the beginning of the 17th century. Since that time Batavia (Jakarta) growing continuously, from a trading office, becoming one of the most populous cities in the world, until it became the capital of Indonesia at the time of independence. In 1975, Governor Ali Sadikin, set a number of areas in DKI Jakarta province as a Cultural Heritage Region, and Kotatua was one of it. Cities transformation which happenned for more than 400 years, has brought Kotatua a significant shift in terms of social, culture, and physical shapes. It becomes a never-ending debate, due to the many interests that intervene in the Kotatua development direction. Until finally an agreement was set, that Kotatua consists of Inner Wall, place where Dutch people live in its heyday, and Outside the walls areas as the location of workers and immigrants residence who came to Batavia. The development of 134 Hectares Inner Wall area, now directed in order to fulfill the UNESCO World Heritage criteria and possible to applied in the local context.
It needs a huge effort to restore and conserve Kotatua back to its former glory, due to the extensive missing documentation and unknown ownership. A big question still remains until today: “Who owns these buildings?”
“Who owns it?” are the question and the first challenge in breaking down Kotatua problems, especially in Inner Wall Area. Learning from numbers of published legal documentation, both of academic papers, government documents, to the writing of the international community, the issues still hard to get the answers. So, the strategy is to perform a spatial approach to identifying problems at the horizontal level. The topic discussion and scope of the study began with a depth survey at all existing locations based on the consideration of historical characters Kotatua morphological development, urban design similarities, corridor / block forms, and social, economic and cultural spaces that scattered throughout the massives area of Kotatua Inner Wall. This step was taken in order to be able to explain the significance of each area, region, district, up to a specific location associated with reviving the latent image. Not to reconstruct completely, but the act of reconstruction is adaptive, so the social and culture issues that has been built and already built, are designed for those who live in the present times. There’s only few findings in the areas that shows the atmospher of the past, some stretches on the city corridors, with a variety of architectural styles that represent several architectural periods. Starting from the building that still has the sense of colonial architecture and maintained its authenticity, up to modern building built on economic pressure to compete live in the state capital. Focus Group Discussion held to encompass a wide range of social issues and challenges to the physical condition of the significance form the basis for developing plans and strategies for the future.
Protecting historical assets without development constrain, this guidelines encourage the creation of city spaces that respond to densify activities in Kotatua. Enforce regulations and laws, through the realignment of government assets, such as around the railway line and along the highway, by balancing the need for outdoor spaces, such as plazas and parks that can be utilized by the community in the Inner Wall.
Kawasan Khusus Sunda Kelapa - Pengembangan Wisata Budaya dan Tepi Air
- Penataan area di sekitar Pasar Ikan menjadi 6KDUHG Pedestrian Walk
Pengembangan Kawasan Hunian - Hunian bertingkat sedang yang dilengkapi dengan ruang terbuka hijau dan plaza
Pengembangan ruang Terbuka - Penambahan Ruang Terbuka Hijau
- Pembentukan Ruang Terbuka untuk aktivitas yang tersebar di beberapa lokasi dan di bawah jembatan tol
Aktivitas Tepi Sungai
Pengembangan Kawasan Pendukung - Fungsi dan Fasilitas yang mendukung aktivitas wisata (Hotel, Restoran, cafe dan lainnya)
Wisata Kanal - Atraksi wisata kanal di kawasan Kotatua
- Memperbaiki kondisi kanal dan kualitas air
Gerbang Utara - Pintu akses utama wisata air dari Laut Jawa
- Deretan Kapal Phinisi
Pasar Ikan - Pembukaan ruang terbuka publik
- Gerbang Utara: Anjungan Laut
Kasteel Batavia - Pengembangan kawasan khusus komersial & Taman Kasteel
Parkir Komunal - Penempatan parkir bersama di bawah Jembatan Tol Rekonstruksi Bangunan Cagar Budaya - Pembangunan kembali bangunan yang telah rusak
- Pengembangan ruang terbuka publik baru untuk situs Batu Padrao
Magnet Edukasi - Pengembangan sekolah/universitas
Kawasan Khusus Fatahillah - Peningkatan kualitas kawasan Fatahillah untuk Budaya dan komersial
Aktivitas Tepi Sungai
Gerbang Selatan - 0HPEHULNDQ LGHQWLWDV EHUXSD SHQDQGD ÀVLN EDWDV Selatan kawasan Kotatua
A guideline must be set as the basis in the design process for architects, in order to understand the characters of Kotatua.
Rekonstruksi Visual - Mengembalikan visual Kotatua yang berorientasi ke Laut Jawa
Koridor Pariwisata - Penataan kembali elemen koridor, seperti: RUMIJA, perabot jalan dan pohon
Muara MRT - Aksesibilitas Sarana Umum Tranportasi Massal (SAUM)
Kanal Wisata
- Atraksi wisata baru yang memanfaatkan kanal yang telah direhabilitasi; - Sarana tranportasi air baru.
Saluran Air Kanal/Riol
- Memindahkan aliran air sungai terpisah dari kali di permukaan
Gambar 4.28 Konsep pengembangan dan penataan panduan yang terintegrasi di Kotatua.
P E N Y E M P UR N A A N PA N D UA N R A N C A N G KOTA / U D G L
for the AGuidelines R E A DAL A M TEM BOK development KOTATUA
does not refer to a definite step, but a VISION became the foundation for anyone who has an interest to know exactly what and how participate for a better future. Details, rules, and standards, become a key to guide the development of the corridors,in order to bring harmony between the micro and macro interventions and reinforces Kotatua Inner Wall character.
PEMERIN
Pand uan Peran can gan
Pan duan Perancang an
Museum Bank Mandiri
Museum Sejarah Jakarta
Batas Ketinggian Maksimal Kawasan Fatahillah Arahan Pengembangan Bangunan Ketinggian Maksimal 20,00 m
Utara Area Pengembangan
Koridor Pariwisata
- Relokasi Terminal ke Bawah Jembatan Tol - Penerapan jalan raya shared untuk pejalan kaki, jalur kendaraan, serta parkir - Penataan kawasan retail, cafe dan restoran yang menunjang aktivitas wisata Kotatua
Kali Besar
Taman Fatahillah
Area Pengembangan
Area Pengembangan
Museum Bank Mandiri
Bank BNI
Stasiun Jakarta Kota
Jalur Tembus
Peta Kunci:
- Memperpendek jarak tempuh pejalan kaki; - Berpotensi menjadi ruang publik/ruang retail/cafe;
Area Perencanaan Kawasan Khusus Area Pengembangan Baru
Jaringan Utilitas - Pengalokasian jaringan listrik, telepon dan sistem lainnya
yang tertata di dalam culvert box; - Penataan saluran drainase dan riol kota yang tertanam dalam tanah, tidak menyatu dengan kanal/kali.
P E N Y E M P UR N AAN PAN DUAN R AN C AN G KOTA/UDG L
A R E A DA L A M T EM B O K KOTAT UA
Stasiun MRT
- Menghubungkan Kotatua wilayah lainnya di Jakarta; - Mengurangi penggunaan kendaraan pribadi;
NTAH P R O V I N S I DA E R A H K HU S U S
I BUKOTA JA KA RTA
4-29
P EM ER INTA H P R OV INSI DA ER A H KHU SU S
IBUKOTA JAKARTA
4-59
2014 Urban Design: Transit (re)Oriented Development Plan
2014 Corridors Structuring
SURABAYa MONORail Surabaya, East Jawa in collaborate with:
The World Bank, Hansen Partnership, SUTD City Form Labs.
Team
Adri Vergian Tanjung, Jonathan Todo Simamora
“Jakarta MRT Competitor� Surabaya Monorail motivated by the development needs of mass transportation network in the city of Surabaya, which is already develop on the East and West sides, without the support of transport facilities. City Government with the support of The World Bank, invited Hansen Partnership, SUTD City Form Lab, and PSUD to plan the best transportation system for the citizens. Seeing the potential of transit point, survey, analysis and study of the context undertaken to elaborate the T.O.D concept to connect the city, and classify specific optimum development at any point of transit to densify and create a better city for the next 30 years.
Surabaya has the ‘fresh’ city image, but it’s too crowded by private vehicle. As the “International Trade and Services City”, Surabaya serves as a center of development of Eastern Indonesia region. However, the availability of transport infrastructure that has not been supported by means of an integrated, resulting in low levels of efficiency and effectiveness. It’ create an impact on consumerism on private vehicles that add volume and load vehicle congestion in the city. Availability of Mass Public Transport infrastructure in the City of Surabaya is expected to improve the mobility of people more efficiently to Surabaya and surrounding areas so that it can attract greater investment. This work is done through the planning of the Surabaya tram and monorail, which is promoted as Surotram and Boyorail. Boyorail with +23.56 km trace length, will serve 25 stations from Western to Surabaya East region.
TB-25
TB-21
TB-19
TB-16
TB-15
TB-6
TB-3
r=700 meter
r = 350 meter
TB-14
T.O.D, Smart Growth, Compact Development, Sustainable Mobility, and Sustainable Transportation, were mixed together in order to achieve best integrated system based on best uses.
Learn from a number of precedents in Asia, to view, define, direct, and plan typologies most appropriate at any point by looking at the station’s potential based on the identification of the location. T.O.D development principle is applied in accordance with the characteristics of the context of the carrying capacity of the development, transportation networks, and future development plans to support the densification and intensification of the area around the point of the monorail station. This development steps includes five (5) ways, namely: development of the micro and macro areas surrounding the development of the station that are integrated, the connectivity of public space with the accessibility optimization, station integration with facilities in the vicinity, available land optimization, and pedestrian network development that meets the rules of comfort, safety, and connectivity between destinations.
T.O.D concept offers a new alternative in the development area of Surabaya,
because, land will accommodate more functions and activities, which provide new opportunities in the arrangement region based compact cluster and friendly to pedestrians, so the development of AMC Corridor line in an integrated manner with the development of the region as a macro that has been declared, not only for the benefit of approximately the existing corridor but also the city of Surabaya widely.
Corridor Structuring: Surabaya Monorail
The Surabaya’s Monorail and Tram Corridors Structuring is a Surabaya Mass Rapid Transit (SMART) which connect city of Surabaya from all directions, providing a convenience and comfortable transportation for the citizen of Surabaya, so it can change the paradigm driving of private vehicles, to switch to public transportation and walking culture and also develops as a friendly largest metropolitan city that accomodate the basic human needs to interact with the city without mobility limitations.
TB-13
TB-4 TB-11
TB-6 TB-10
TB-3
TB-5 TB-8
TB-7
TB-2
TB-1
TB-9
TB-
TB-29’
TB-28’
TB-27’
TB-26’
TB-15
TB-25’
TB-17
TB-14
-9’
TB-24’
TB-16
TB-18 TB-22
TB-19
TB-23
TB-21
TB-12 TB-20
TB-24
TB-25
2015 Architecture Competition: Kota Pusaka
Image Source: COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM
2015
towards indonesia’s first ecopolis
Bogor: Kota pusakA ‘teduh’ dalam taman Bogor, West Java
Competition: 1st Place Team
Yogie Dwimas, Adrianto Santoso, Adri Tanjung, R. Winton Danardi, Fitrania Halla, Rianti Swayastuti, Agam Dwi Prabowo, Cindy Hutagalung, Ardian Wiratama, Teguh Risnandar Putra, Jonathan Todo Simamora, Ganesha Mangkoesoebroto, Arina Resyta
“The past and the future Bogor” This competition was initiated by the Ministry of Public Works and IAI, to revitalize some of the city heritage in Indonesia in order to achieve the title of UNESCO World Heritage. The process took less than 2 (two) weeks, carried out by a 2 large team team, the macro and the micro team. Our findings, finds that growing urban centers and daily activities in Bogor can not be separated from the palace and botanical gardens, so the design was shaped to accommodate imaging of Bogor as the “shady” Heritage Cities for all.
Bogor Botanical Garden. This three syllables start the process of the Competition. Since the late 18th century, Bogor has been internationally known because of the Botanical Garden has an internationally recognized by many scientists for its collections. Almost all types of plants in the world has its place in the area of this botanical garden. Experience various changes in leadership, Bogor faces hard times in the transition period, until the Dutch efforts make it as Batavia satellite city by placing the Military and crossed by the railway line. The history of Bogor or Buitenzorg has started since the days of old kingdom. History, background check, and the city growth are some of the methods that conducted to examine the extent to which period of the city romance city can be restored and revitalized to answers numbers of issues that exist in Bogor.
Today, Bogor are fill with a very complicated issues, such as high level of commuter, freight transport fleet of the city of excessive congestion on the vertices around the botanical gardens, and the city began depletion of forest atmosphere by the pressure of a very high building. Stations, terminals, and the traditional market became a destination and movement paths with the potential to composing the network that has been formed and capture the activities by making it as a places for friendly transit area.
The design development is based on five principles: Shady, Cultural Terrace, Heritage Orientation, Rejuvenation, and Integrated Transit Region.
#1 Bogor = Shady (City) Increasing levels of ‘green’ cities and the expansion of urban green networks around the 6 (six) axis orientation of Bogor Botanical Gardens direction.
#2 Public and Private Space Integration = Cultural Heritage Terrace Open space expansion area of pedestrian level as an integrated, attractive and humane city terrace .
#3 Heritage Orientation = 6 axis The redesign of public open space and landscape in the area around the marker dots meeting axis.
#4 Kampung Kota Improvement Low density Apartment development with the principles of building without displacing + land consolidation scheme.
#5 Transir re-Oriented Development Movement efficiency with a potential to reduce private vehicles uses around the heritage area.
Design are focused on 3 location: Baranang Siang, Pecinan (China Town), & Paledang. So, the implementation is set to be done in a staged for 10 years.
The development on these 3 locations is a top priority, considering the source of the problems such as congestion and potential source of the economy and society are situated at these locations. Efforts are being made with the simultaneously and gradually scheduled, hoping to unravel the concentration of the vehicle in the transition process towards pedestrians friendly city.
Kujang Landmarks + Baranang Siang Terminals
Botanical Garden & Pecinan
Paledang: Creative Millieu
Bogor: A Garden Heritage “shady” city.
The design purpose is to restore the romance of the city that were built by the colonial and imperial state which left one of the best cities in Indonesia. Bogor Botanical Gardens nuance, always attached, not only for the people who live, but also those who visit. It’s charm and image that want to continuily transmitted to the next generation, without limiting the needs to constantly developing. The interference of architects, in arranging and designing living space and human movement becomes key in creating a garden heritage “shady” city: Bogor.
Image Source: COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM
“Do for the future what you’re grateful the past did for you.” – Danny Hillis, the Golden Rule of Time
Portfolio 2 0 1 2
-
2 0 1 6 . 1