http://www.eomf.on.ca/media/k2/attachments/2005_2006_Final_EOMF_Work_Plan

Page 1

Work Plan 2005-2006

Prepared for Canadian Forest Service 1219 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5

February 25, 2005 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Forests for seven generations ~ Des forêts pour sept générations


Table of Contents Work Plan Overview ..................................................................................................................................

i

Work Plan Overview Flow Chart ...............................................................................................................

viii

Financial Tables ..........................................................................................................................................

ix

Objective 1 Increase the Quality & Health of Existing Woodlands 1.1/02 Landowner Workshop Series .......................................................................................................... 1.2/02 Demonstration Forest Initiative ....................................................................................................... 1.3/02 Web-Enabled Forest Management Tool ......................................................................................... 1.4/02 Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network .......................................................................................... 1.5/02 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities ................................................................................................ 1.6/02 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities ......................................................................................... 1.7/02 Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative ...................................................................................... 1.8/02 Landowner Education ..................................................................................................................... 1.9/02 Recognition Program ................................................................................................................... 1.11/03 Science Management .................................................................................................................. 1.12/03 Biodiversity Indicators for Woodlands Owners (Observer Network) …………………………..

1 5 9 12 18 21 24 29 33 37 41

Objective 2 Increase Forest Cover Across the Landscape 2.1/02 Sustainable Forest Management in Local Government Plans ........................................................ 2.2/02 Desired Future Forest Condition Project ............................................................................... 2.3/02 Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration .......................................................................................... 2.4/02 Strategic Planting Initiative ........................................................................................................... 2.5/02 Community and Former Agreement Forest Areas .......................................................................... 2.6/02 Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest ......................................................................................

45 49 52 55 58 61

Objective 3 Expand the Informed, Knowledgeable & Committed Population 3.1/02 Communications & Outreach …….................................................................................................

65

Objective 4 Increase the Strategic Transfer of SFM Beyond the Area of the EOMF 4.1/02 Exchange of SFM Beyond the Boundaries .................................................................................. 4.2/02 Web Site Use for Beyond the Boundaries Transfer of SFM ........................................................

70 77

Objective 5 Strengthen SFM Through Equity Generation, Partnership Building and Program Analysis & Evaluation 5.1/02 Equity Generation .......................................................................................................................... 5.2/02 Akwesasne Partnership .................................................................................................................. 5.3/02 Analysis & Evaluation .....................................................................................................................

80 84 89


Work Plan Overview 2005-2006

Objective 1 Increase the Health & Quality of Existing Woodlands 1.1/02 Landowner Workshop Series Building on the suite of more than 10 courses that have been developed to date, the focus of activities for the current year includes: • Documenting a methodology to developing courses so that future partners can more easily develop new course titles. • Finalizing new courses (e.g., Climate Change for Woodlot Owners, Wood and Tree Quality Assessment & Evaluation) based on client feedback, potential gaps and new information. • Promoting further outreach of the existing suite of courses. Supplementary funding will be sought to facilitate the development of additional courses. *$25,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

1.2/02 Demonstration Forest Initiative In the current fiscal year, activities will focus on reviewing and updating the Ferguson Forest Centre forest management plan and conducting some harvest operations in over-stocked stands. As follow-up to last year’s activities at Fortune Farms, revisions to the technical guide will be made based on client feedback. In partnership with Kemptville College (University of Guelph) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, the EOMF will also assist with efforts to inventory the Kemptville College Agroforestry Centre woodlot and upgrade the maple interpretive facility. A further activity will be to facilitate opportunities to develop a landscape demonstration project in Prince Edward County, sharing the experiences of Bog to Bog and the Leeds Landscape Connectivity (‘Lake to Lake’) project. *$18,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

1.3/02 Web Enabled Forest Management Tool The current phase of this project involves establishing an audit team made up of potential end users of the Forest Management Tool (woodlot owners, forest consultants, MFTIP plan writers, and forest consultants), as well as other interested stakeholders (EOMF staff and personnel with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources). An audit strategy will be developed to include such tactics as online surveys and other feedback mechanisms, focus groups, and brainstorming sessions. The results of the audit will be compiled into a document and plan for future development of the Forest Management Tool. *$8,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

i


1.4/02 Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network (EOUFN) Building on the efforts of the past several years, the EOUFN will strive to raise the profile of urban forests in eastern Ontario and beyond through: • • • •

Better communications between larger and smaller municipalities. Education of those that live and work in the urban setting. Input into official plans and zoning by-laws recognizing trees. Use of urban forest techniques prescribed by the International Society of Arborists, Landscape Ontario and the Forest Gene Conservation Association.

Sharing the experiences of the EOUFN nationally (e.g., through participation in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy and strengthening of the Canadian Urban Forest Network) will be a further area of focus for the current fiscal year. *$32,500 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

1.5/02 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities Non-timber forest products represent a significant benefit to landowners who own non-commercial forests or who are not interested in traditional harvesting as a means of generating revenue. The focus of this year’s activities will be to complete the development of a comprehensive Best Management Practices manual for agroforestry. *$62,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

1.6/02 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities The EOMF will continue to facilitate discussions with the owners of WIA agreement forests and other privately-held lands. As part of efforts, a discussion paper on woodlot economics for private landowners will be produced. Opportunities for involving these forest owners in ongoing forest certification efforts will continue to be pursued. *$4,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

1.7/02 Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative Following the December 2002 audit by SmartWood, the EOMF has been certified as a Resource Manager in accordance with the Principles and Criteria of the Forest Stewardship Council. The current year’s efforts include the expansion of the existing landowner cluster and the establishment of another group of forest owners elsewhere in eastern Ontario. The sharing of experiences and transfer of knowledge relative to certification in settled landscapes with others outside the area of the EOMF remains equally important. The project will also explore possibilities for establishing additional nodes for certification both within and beyond the area of the EOMF. *$448,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

ii


1.8/02 Landowner Education This project supports a staff liaison (Project Forester) in the provision of technical forestry expertise to landowners through various landowner-related activities and projects. Critical support will be provided to the Landowner Workshop Series project, the Demonstration Forest initiative, the Non-timber Revenue Opportunities project, the Timber Product Revenue Opportunities project and other landowner-based projects and activities (e.g., forest certification, beyond-the-boundaries transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices, revision of the EOMF Code of Forestry Practice). The Project Forester will also assist with follow-up activities associated with the Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration project and the Strategic Planting Initiative. *$50,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

1.9/02 Recognition Program The EOMF will continue to recognize outstanding efforts toward sustainable forests via certificates of achievement, partnership signs, the Ross Silversides Forestry Award, nominations to existing recognition programs, and the EOMF Environmental Award. A new thrust for the current fiscal year will be to refine the criteria and process for delivery of the new EOMF volunteerism award – which has been named the ‘Heartwood Award’. The Communications Committee will also explore opportunities for recognizing women through an award and/or special event (e.g., “women of influence in conservation” symposium). *$5,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

1.11/03 Science Management The Forest Science Committee will continue provide advice and guidance to the EOMF from a forest science point of view. Implementation of the science strategy developed in 2003-2004 will provide a focus for efforts. In addition to overseeing ongoing state of the forest monitoring and reporting efforts, a key activity for the Forest Science Committee this fiscal year will be to provide guidance to the Future Forest Condition project. *$3,500 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

1.12/03 Biodiversity Indicators for Woodland Owners (Observer Network) Efforts under this project have focused on the development of observation protocols and tools, along with the delivery of landowner training sessions dealing with monitoring and maintaining biodiversity. Efforts have also been directed at encouraging participation in the Observer Network. Populating the Observer Network Web site (developed in 2004-2005) with past data recorded by the existing group of observers will be a key focus of efforts in the current fiscal year. Involving this same group of observers in another spring biodiversity data collection effort, and subsequent reporting effort, will be another key activity. Further to this, an assessment of the data collection and input process will be conducted. *$8,500 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

iii


Objective 2 Increase Forest Cover Across the Landscape 2.1/02 Sustainable Forest Management in Local Government Plans In 2005-2006, funding for the project will continue to be sought, and to support these efforts, a business case for a re-scoped “Municipal Guidebook” will be prepared. Rather than compiling and preparing a broad-scope document of current, science-based information into a plain-language guidebook, we plan to take advantage of the expertise shown by municipalities themselves. While there may not be a municipality in eastern Ontario that is adept at handling all forest-related issues, there are certainly many that can serve as examples to others in certain aspects of sustainable forest management. The document to be prepared under this project will be comprised of a set of examples and case studies where municipalities have shown outstanding and innovative work on a variety of forest-related issues. A business case for this document will be prepared as a tool for the EOMF Equity Committee to use to generate funding to continue the project. The scope of the document will be established, case studies will be identified, and preliminary contacts will be made with municipalities in the region. *$7,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

2.2/02 Desired Future Forest Condition Pilot At the November 2004 ‘Advance’ the importance of continuing and strengthening efforts associated with the Future Forest Condition project was re-affirmed. Key efforts for the current fiscal year include: • Consulting with stakeholders to discuss the Future Forest Condition plan. • Identifying thresholds and various scenarios. • Determining gaps between current indicator status and predicted indicator status. The Forest Science Committee will be responsible for overseeing this important piece of work. *$18,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

2.3/02 Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration Although Trillium funding for this project ended in February 2005, the steering committee will continue to meet regularly to discuss opportunities to continue with the project. *$6,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

2.4/02 Strategic Planting Initiative Planting under the Strategic Planting Initiative has come to a close. A report documenting successes and lessons learned will be produced and shared widely. As another important function, the EOMF will assist, along with partners, in the tending of existing plantations as needed. *$6,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

iv


2.5/02 Community and Former Agreement Forest Areas The focus of efforts in 2005-2006 will be to maintain an active liaison with community forests by participating in the current year’s Community Forest Owners meeting, and by assisting in formulating the agenda for this meeting. The project will also explore, on an individual basis, the interest of community forests in becoming involved in initiatives such as sustainable forest certification. *$7,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

2.6/02 Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest Based upon the refined framework of indicators developed for Phase III state of the forest efforts, the focus of the current year’s monitoring and reporting season will be to complete the indicators under the following criteria: 1) Soil & Water, and 2) Economic & Social Benefits. Communicating the findings associated with the indicators under these two criteria will be a further priority in the current fiscal year. *$53,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

Objective 3 Expand the Informed, Knowledgeable & Committed Population 3.1/02 Communications & Outreach The EOMF Communications Committee is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the Phase III (2002-2007) Communications & Outreach Plan. Key efforts for the current fiscal year include: • Ongoing implementation and tweaking of Communications & Outreach program activities, with a focus on ensuring a strong finish to the end of Phase III • Addressing recommendations set out in the December 2004 benchmarking exercise “Communications & Outreach in the EOFG”. • Documenting and effectively communicating EOMF successes and outcomes. • Reviewing, and adjusting as appropriate, the communications/outreach-related performance indicators identified in the EOMF’s Phase III Evaluation & Performance Management Framework. *$170,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

Objective 4 Increase the Strategic Transfer of SFM Beyond the Area of the EOMF 4.1/02 Exchange of SFM Beyond the Boundaries The EOMF will continue to broaden and strengthen the transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond eastern Ontario through various activities and events. As part of the continuing approach to working beyond our boundaries, the expertise of a special advisor who resides in the greater Toronto area will be used to provide regular representation in meetings and events linked to our efforts (e.g., meetings of The Ontario Rural Council, OMNR science forums, etc.) The EOMF will play a strong role in supporting regional, national and international efforts at furthering sustainable forestry. Examples include: • Working alongside the Lake Abitibi Model Forest as an “Ontario Model Forest Network” on broad policy-level initiatives (e.g., Canada-Ontario MOU on Forestry) and various outreach efforts.

v


• Providing input to, and supporting, the strategic initiatives of the Canadian Model Forest Network – in particular, the EOMF will continue to play a strong role in helping to guide and support the Private Woodlots Strategic Initiative. • Supporting network-level communications and outreach efforts (e.g., representation at events, development of communications materials). • Participating on the various network-level steering committees (e.g., Private Woodlots Steering Committee, Web Site Steering Committee). • Providing input to the National Forest Strategy and supporting its implementation province-wide. • Participating in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy as a member of the Canadian Urban Forest Network. • Hosting tours with international delegations in partnership with the International Model Forest Network Secretariat (IMFNS). • Supporting communications and outreach efforts of the IMFNS. *$18,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

4.2/02 Web Site Use for Beyond the Boundaries Transfer of SFM This project is designed to increase the services and information made available through the EOMF Web site which will help to promote sustainable forest management and related topics. Current deliverables for this project include the addition of an online survey system to the EOMF Web site, making use of cutting-edge Web development tools and techniques. With this enhancement, the EOMF can conduct online polls and surveys to gauge public understanding of sustainable forest management concepts, the effectiveness of EOMF program delivery, demand for workshops on various topics, and more. *$12,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

Objective 5 Strengthen SFM Through Equity Generation, Partnership Building and Program Analysis & Evaluation 5.1/02 Equity Generation This project supports the activities of the EOMF Equity Committee. Critical areas of focus for the current fiscal year include: • Strengthening new and existing partnerships. • Preparing applications and proposals associated with specific equity needs. • Locating funding to replace and/or support shortfalls in identified program areas. • Broadening the EOMF’s base of support by examining current partnerships and analyzing gaps. • Generating financial capacity and developing further partnerships to assist in creating a higher profile for existing and newly-developed sustainable forest management materials and tools. • Developing and implementing transition strategies through branding, membership and greater integration with other sectors (e.g., agriculture, environment). The Equity Generation project leader, through the Equity Committee, will facilitate these efforts. *$110,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

vi


5.2/02 Akwesasne Partnership The EOMF will continue to work in close cooperation with the community at Akwesasne in developing and delivering sustainable forest management messages and activities. Key efforts under the Akwesasne Partnership for the current fiscal year include: • Ongoing participation on EOMF committees and working groups (with special interest in analysis and evaluation efforts). • Ongoing participation in beyond-the-boundaries outreach efforts of the EOMF and the Canadian Model Forest Network. • Participation in province-wide butternut preservation efforts. • The development of a PowerPoint presentation on the historical and cultural significance of butternut to the Haudenosaunee. • The development of a seed bank for all species of ash (given concerns associated with the emerald ash borer). • Ongoing work to enhance and expand the existing network of black ash plots. • Ongoing work to restore native fruit trees at Akwesasne. • The delivery of forestry-related programs to local schools. • The cataloguing of culturally-significant species on Sheik Island. *$187,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

5.3/02 Analysis & Evaluation Efforts in the current year will focus on incorporating the results of the Phase III ‘Advance’ (held November 18-19, 2004) into EOMF activities and programs to ensure a strong finish to the end of Phase III. Feedback from the Advance will also serve to guide future directions for the EOMF in the longer-term (i.e., beyond March 2007). The ongoing refinement and application of the EOMF’s Evaluation & Performance Management Framework will also be a priority. Documenting and effectively communicating our many successes will be a critically important exercise in the current fiscal year. *$3,000 – Total effort by the EOMF, its partners and supporters.

*For further detail on funding sources, please see the individual project plans.

vii


WORK PLAN OVERVIEW 2005 2005--2006 Objective 1 Increase Quality & Health of Existing Woodlands

Objective 2 Increase Forest Cover Across the Landscape

Objective 3 Expand the Informed, Knowledgeable & Committed Population

Objective 4 Increase Strategic Transfer of SFM Beyond the EOMF

Objective 5 Strengthen SFM Through Equity, Partnerships and Analysis & Evaluation

Rural Landowners

Agencies & Government

Public

Public Beyond EOMF

All Groups

Landowner Workshop Series Series $5,000 Demonstration Forest Initiative $3,000 Web Enabled Management Tool $5,000 Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network $3,000 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities $2,000 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities $2,000 Sustainable Forest Certification $53,000

SFM in Local Government Plans $5,000

Communications & Outreach $56,000

Desired Future Forest Condition $10,000

Exchange of SFM Beyond the Boundaries $8,000

Equity Generation $10,000

Web Site Use for SFM Transfer $10,000

Akwesasne Partnership $44,000

Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration $0

Analysis & Evaluation $1,000

Strategic Planting Initiative $0 Former Agreement Forest Areas $2,000

C&I / State of the Forest $38,000

Landowner Education $40,000

♦ ♦ ♦

Recognition Program $2,000

Eastern Ontario Model Forest Committee Structure The Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Working Group, the Certification Working Group, and the Nominating & Awards Committee oversee key projects under Objective 1. The Forest Science Committee holds primary responsibility for overseeing Objective 2; The Forests & Climate Change Working Group is also in place to guide efforts under Objectives 1 and 2. The Communications Committee oversees Objective 3. All Committees are inextricably linked with Objective 4. The Equity Committee oversees Objective 5.

Science Management $1,000 Biodiversity Indicators for Woodland Owners $0

Objective 1 TOTAL $116,000

Objective 2 TOTAL $55,000

Objective 3 TOTAL $56,000

Page -viii-

Objective 4 TOTAL $18,000

Objective 5 TOTAL $55,000


2005-2006 Project Budget EOMF ($)

Direct

Direct

Contribution - Other ($)

Contribution - In-Kind ($)

Objective 1 – Increase the Quality & Health of Existing Woodlands 1.1/02 Landowner Workshop Series 1.2/02 Demonstration Forest Initiative

5000 3,000 5,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 53,000 40,000 2,000 1,000 0

10,000 5,000 0 0 30,000 0 220,000 0 0 0 4,500

10,000 10,000 3,000 29,500 30,000 2,000 175,000 10,000 3,000 2,500 4,000

0 116,000

0 269,500

0 279,000

5,000

0

2,000

10,000 0 0 2,000 38,000 0 55,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 15,000 0 42,000

56,000 56,000

12,000 12,000

102,000 102,000

8,000 10,000

0 0

10,000 2,000

18,000

0

12,000

ADMINISTRATION

10,000 44,000 1,000 55,000 200,000

90,000 55,000 0 145,000 48,500

10,000 88,000 2,000 100,000 20,000

PROGRAM TOTALS (Projects Only)

500,000

475,000

555,000

1.3/02 Web Enabled Forest Management Tool 1.4/02 Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network 1.5/02 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities 1.6/02 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities 1.7/02 Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative 1.8/02 Landowner Education 1.9/02 Recognition ‘Program’ 1.11/03 Science Management 1.12/03 Biodiversity Indicators for Woodland Owners

1.13/03 Sugar Maple and Climate Impacts Objective 2 – Increase Forest Cover Across the Landscape 2.1/02 Sustainable Forest Management in Local Government Plans 2.2/02 Desired Future Forest Condition Pilot Project 2.3/02 Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration 2.4/02 Strategic Planting Initiative 2.5/02 Community and Former Agreement Areas 2.6/02 Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest 2.8/04 Leeds Landscape Connectivity Project Objective 3 – Expand the Informed, Knowledgeable & Committed Population 3.1/02 Communications & Outreach (Plan) Objective 4 – Increase the Strategic Transfer of SFM Beyond the Area of the EOMF 4.1/02 Exchange of SFM Beyond the Boundaries 4.2/02 Web Site Use for Beyond the Boundaries Transfer of SFM Objective 5 – Strengthen SFM Through Equity Generation, Partnership Building and Program Analysis & Evaluation 5.1/02 Equity Generation 5.2/02 Akwesasne Partnership 5.3/02 Analysis & Evaluation

ix


EOMF Five Year Summary

Funding 2003/04

Funding 2004/05

Funding 2005/06

5,000 3,000 10,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 50,000 40,000 2,000 0 1,000 4,000

0 8,000 5,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 50,000 40,000 2,000 0 0 7000

5,000 3,000 5,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 53,000 40,000 2,000 0 1,000 0

4000 4,000 5,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 50,000 40,000 2,000 0 1000 4000

0 122,000

0 122,000

0 119,000

0 116,000

0 117,000

2.1/02 Sustainable Forest Management in Local Government Plans

10,000

2,000

2,000

5,000

6,000

2.2/02 Desired Future Forest Condition Pilot Project 2.3/02 Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration 2.4/02 Strategic Planting Initiative 2.5/02 Community and Former Agreement Areas 2.6/02 Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest 2.8/04 Leeds Landscape Connectivity Project

10,000 0 0 5,000 40,000 0 65,000

9,000 0 0 2,000 47,000 0 60,000

2,000 0 0 2,000 48,000 0 54,000

10,000 0 0 2,000 38,000 0 55,000

8,000 0 0 2,000 30,000 0 46,000

51,000 51,000

51,000 51,000

56,000 56,000

56,000 56,000

56,000 56,000

3,000 10,000

8,000 10,000

9,000 11,000

8,000 10,000

5,000 2,000

0

0

0

0

13,000

18,000

20,000

18,000

7,000

5,000 44,000 0 49,000

5,000 44,000 0 49,000

5,000 44,000 2,000 51,000

10,000 44,000 1,000 55,000

5,000 44,000 25,000 74,000

300,000

300,000

300,000

300,000

300,000

Funding 2002/03

Funding 2006/07

Total

Objective 1 – Increase the Quality & Health of Existing Woodlands 1.1/02 Landowner Workshop Series 1.2/02 Demonstration Forest Initiative 1.3/02 Web Enabled Forest Management Tool 1.4/02 Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network 1.5/02 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities 1.6/02 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities 1.7/02 Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative 1.8/02 Landowner Education 1.9/02 Recognition ‘Program’ 1.10/02 Science & Information Gaps 1.11/03 Science Management 1.12/03 Biodiversity Indicators for Woodland Owners 1.13/03 Sugar Maple and Climate Impacts

0 8,000 10,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 50,000 40,000 2,000 5,000

Objective 2 – Increase Forest Cover Across the Landscape

14,000 26,000 35,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 250,000 200,000 10,000 5,000 5000 22,000 0 602,000 0 25,000 39,000 0 0 13,000 203,000 0 280,000

Objective 3 – Expand the Informed, Knowledgeable & Committed Population 3.1/02 Communications & Outreach (Plan) Objective 4 – Increase the Strategic Transfer of SFM Beyond the Area of the EOMF 4.1/02 Exchange of SFM Beyond the Boundaries 4.2/02 Web Site Use for Beyond the Boundaries Transfer of SFM 4.3/02 SFM Initiatives With First Nations Communities Beyond the EOMF

PROGRAM TOTALS (Projects Only)

270,000 0 33,000 38,000 0

Objective 5 – Strengthen SFM Through Equity Generation, Partnership Building and Program Analysis & Evaluation 5.1/02 Equity Generation 5.2/02 Akwesasne Partnership 5.3/02 Analysis & Evaluation

270,000

71,000

0 30,000 220,000 28,000 277,000 0 1,500,000


Eastern Ontario Model Forest Canadian Forest Service Contribution Agreement EOMF Financial Projection 2005/2006 INCOME Federal Grant Membership Other Charitable Donations Contracts & Supplementary Projects Fund Balance

1st 1/4 $125,000 $1,750 $10,375 $250 $102,914 $57,554

2nd 1/4 $125,000 $1,750 $10,375 $250 $102,914 $57,554

3rd 1/4 $125,000 $1,750 $10,375 $250 $102,914 $57,554

4th 1/4 $125,000 $1,750 $10,375 $250 $102,914 $57,554

TOTAL $500,000 7,000 41,500 1,000 411,656 230,214

TOTAL INCOME

$297,842.50

$297,842.50

$297,842.50

$297,842.50

1,191,370

1st 1/4

2nd 1/4

3rd 1/4

4th 1/4

Expenses

TOTAL

Salary and Benefits Core Operation & Administration Charitable Expenses Contract & Supplementary Projects

$46,000 $16,125 $250 $102,914

$46,000 $16,125 $250 $102,914

$46,000 $16,125 $250 $102,914

$46,000 $16,125 $250 $102,914

184,000 64,500 1,000 411,656

Total Administration

$162,289

$162,289

$165,289

$165,289

661,156

1,250 750 1250

1,250 750 1250

1,250 750 1250

1,250 750 1250

5,000 3,000 5,000

750

750

750

750

3,000

500 500

500 500

500 500

500 500

2,000 2,000

1.7/02 Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative

13,250

13,250

13,250

13,250

53,000

1.8/02 Landowner Education 1.9/02 Recognition ‘Program’ 1.10/03 Science & Information Gaps 1.11/02 - Science Management 1.12/03 Bio. Ind. For Woodland Owners (Observer Network)

10,000 500 0 250 0

10,000 500 0 250 0

10,000 500 0 250 0

10,000 500 0 250 0

40,000 2,000 0 1,000 0

1.13/03 Sugar Maple and Climate Impacts Total Objective 1

0 29,000

0 29,000

0 29,000

0 29,000

0 116,000

Objective 1 – Increase the Quality & Health of Existing Woodlands 1.1/02 Landowner Workshop Series 1.2/02 Demonstration Forest Initiative 1.3/02 Web Enabled Forest Management Tool 1.4/02 Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network 1.5/02 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities 1.6/02 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities

xi


Objective 2 – Increase Forest Cover Across the Landscape 2.1/02 Sustainable Forest Management in Local Government Plans

1,250

1,250

1,250

1,250

5,000

2,500

2,500

2,500

2,500

10,000

0

0

0

0

0

0 500

0 500

0 500

0 500

0 2,000

9,500

9,500

9,500

9,500

38,000

0 13,750

0 13,750

0 13,750

0 13,750

0 55,000

14,000 14,000

14,000 14,000

14,000 14,000

14,000 14,000

56,000 56,000

4.1/02 Exchange of SFM Beyond the Boundaries

2,000

2,000

2,000

2,000

8,000

4.2/02 Web Site Use for Beyond the Boundaries Transfer of SFM

2500

2500

2500

2500

10,000

0

0

0

0

0

4500

4500

4500

4500

18,000

2,500 11,000 250 13,750

2,500 11,000 250 13,750

2,500 11,000 250 13,750

2,500 11,000 250 13,750

10,000 44,000 1,000 55,000

75,000 240,289

75,000 240,289

75,000 240,289

75,000 240,289

300,000 961,156

2.2/02 Desired Future Forest Condition Pilot Project 2.3/02 Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration 2.4/02 Strategic Planting Initiative 2.5/02 Community and Former Agreement Areas 2.6/02 Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest 2.7/03 FAACS Afforestation Project Total Objective 2 Objective 3 – Expand the Informed, Knowledgeable & Committed Population 3.1/02 Communications & Outreach (Plan) Total Objective 3 Objective 4 – Increase the Strategic Transfer of SFM Beyond the Area of the EOMF

4.3/02 SFM Initiatives With First Nations Communities Beyond the EOMF Total Objective 4 Objective 5 – Strengthen SFM Through Equity Generation, Partnership Building and Program Analysis & Evaluation 5.1/02 Equity Generation 5.2/02 Akwesasne Partnership 5.3/02 Analysis & Evaluation Total Objective 5 PROGRAM TOTALS (Projects Only) Total Expenditure

xii


1. Project Name:

Landowner Workshop (Course-in-a-Box) Series

2. Project #:

1.1/02

3. Project Leader:

Mark Richardson

4. Partners:

Lead Partners and Role: Landowner Workshop Series Steering Committee. Participating Partners and Role: EOMF, local Stewardship Councils, Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. The Landowner Workshop Series Steering Committee is responsible for overseeing the coordination and delivery of the workshops, with support and assistance from the participating partners.

5. Rationale:

Surveys have consistently shown that landowners want hands-on educational programs developed specifically for their needs. In Phase II, the Landowner Workshop Series program demonstrated that this approach can have an impact on how landowners approach property stewardship and land management. The importance of expanding this effort therefore is clear. The concept of ‘canning’ a number of recognized and accepted Best Management Practices (BMP’s) into a series of courses on a variety of relevant SFM and land management topics has not been tried in other model forests or other regions of the country.

6. Linkages:

The Landowner Workshop Series has linkages to a number of other EOMF projects. Courses are planned that will feed into the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative, C&I / State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting efforts, Web site development efforts, and beyond the boundaries transfer of knowledge and tools.

7. Description:

The EOMF, under the guidance of the Steering Committee, will provide significant in-kind support to the development and delivery of the workshop series in 2005/06. Specifically, the project leader will work on three major areas of focus: 1. Documenting a methodology to developing courses so that future partners can more easily develop new course titles. 2. Finalizing new courses and updating existing ones based on: • client feedback • potential gaps • new information 3. Promoting outreach It is accepted that the Ontario Stewardship network offers the best opportunity for outreach of the course titles. To this end, the project leader and the steering committee will formulate a long-term business plan geared at extending the outreach of the project. Efforts will be made to enhance the existing partnership with the local stewardship coordinators and expand this to areas outside of the EOMF region. Warehousing of the individual courses, along with the cataloguing and promotion of individual titles, will be addressed (with the EOMF continuing to take a lead role). In addition, a Web site for the project will be registered and developed. Initially, the Web site will focus on promotional aspects of the project with information (abstract) on existing titles. Future plans for the Web site include setting up specific courses for on-line delivery.

-1-


Supplementary funding (e.g., Trillium, Ontario Stewardship) will be sought to facilitate the development of additional courses.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To develop and deliver practical, hands-on courses tailored to landowners, forest workers and forestry consultants. 2. To expand the reach of the project (e.g., delivery, promotion of the courses) both within and beyond the area of the EOMF.

9. Implementation Strategy:

Increasing the use of SFM by landowners and forest workers (Objective 1).

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Landowners, forest workers, forestry consultants. Co-Deliverers: Landowner Workshop Series Steering Committee, partners (as listed in Section 4). Other Beneficiaries: Stewardship councils in eastern Ontario and beyond, Conservation Authorities, interest groups.

-2-


11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$5,000

$10,000 – Contribution from other agencies and steering Committee

$10,000 – Contribution of steering committee, partners, EOMF staff.

Total - $5,000

Total - $10,000

Total - $10,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Ongoing Landowner Workshop Series outreach and delivery.

Complete

• Launched the program to the Ontario Stewardship network (awareness-building exercise) – see www.ontariostewardship.org • Delivered the EAB/A LB course on 8 occasions (3 of these were beyond-the-boundaries events), reaching 150 landowners/practitioners. • Developed first draft of the climate change course. N.B. Some activities planned for 2004-05 were deferred to 2005-06 given the urgent need for a course on both the Asian longhorned beetle (ALB) and the emerald ash borer (EAB). Activities for 2005-2006 Develop and submit supplementary funding proposal to the Ontario Trillium Foundation.

July 2005

Finalize the following course titles: 1) Climate Change for Woodlot Owners 2) Wood and Tree Quality Assessment & Evaluation

December 2005

Update the following course titles: 1) Asian longhorned beetle / emerald ash borer 2) Woodlot Management

December 2005

Update course list.

December 2005

Document methodology for developing new courses.

December 2005

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Landowner workshop series outreach and delivery.

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Course on ALB/EAB. • Delivery of the course on ALB/EAB on 8 occasions. • Launch / awareness-building exercise with Ontario Stewardship network.

-3-


• First draft of climate change course. Deliverables for 2005-2006 Supplementary funding to support the project.

September 2005

Finalized and updated courses as identified in Section 12 above.

December 2005

Updated course list.

December 2005

Report and course on ‘how to develop a course in a box’

December 2005

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • A fostering of the development of a large number of courses and information packages aimed at private landowners and forestry consultants delivering private land management. • Finalization and updating of existing courses, along with the development of new courses. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • A strengthening of the quality of management occurring on private land by developing and increasing landowner and forestry worker awareness of issues pertinent to private land stewardship. 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • An increase in the number of hectares of land managed appropriately. • An enhanced capacity for private landowners to access and apply pertinent information on topical areas of interest to the stewardship of their properties. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This project will build on Phase II efforts by delivering an expanded suite of landowner workshops. As part of Phase III efforts, the courses developed under this project will be promoted more vigorously and delivered more broadly across the landscape, both within and beyond the EOMF. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Performance indicators may include: • Number, diversity and scope of workshops developed. • Number of times courses are delivered, within and beyond the EOMF. • Number of participants at workshop events. • Feedback on the utility of courses.

-4-


1. Project Name:

Demonstration Forest Initiative

2. Project #:

1.2/02

3. Project Leader:

Mark Richardson

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF Participating Partner(s) and Role: Private landowners, Ferguson Forest Centre, local Stewardship Coordinators, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Kemptville College (University of Guelph).

5. Rationale:

The Demonstration Forest Initiative has been underway since the inception of the EOMF. Since this time, the EOMF has developed or partnered in the development of over 80 individual demonstration sites within its region. In addition, a new map and a Web site of demonstration areas has been published. The EOMF has been hosting tours of various sites as requested by the public, the Canadian Model Forest Network (CMFN) and various interest groups. While the EOMF plans to continue with the maintenance of existing demonstration sites and the development of new ones as appropriate, efforts in 2005-2006 will focus on the upgrade of the Ferguson Forest Centre demonstration site and the Fortune Farms demonstration site. The EOMF will also partner with Kemptville College (University of Guelph) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food to inventory the Kemptville College Agroforestry Centre woodlot and assist with upgrades to the maple interpretive facility. The Ferguson Forest Centre holds great potential as a ‘flagship’ demonstration site for the EOMF, being only a 2-kilometre drive from EOMF headquarters and a 30-minute drive from CMFN headquarters in Ottawa. Fortune’s Sugar Bush has also been an important demonstration forest for the EOMF since it was developed in Phase I – being used extensively to showcase sustainable forest management practices to visitors from near and abroad alike. The Kemptville College (University of Guelph) Agroforestry Centre woodlot and maple interpretive facility hold great potential for providing educational opportunities. The woodlot is in need of inventory, and the maple facility is in need of some upgrades.

6. Linkages:

This demonstration project has strong linkages to all EOMF objectives and most of the ongoing projects within the EOMF. It has strong ties to the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative, the Landowner Workshop Series, the Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration, the Leeds Landscape Connectivity (‘Lake to Lake’) Project and the Community and Former Agreement Forest Areas initiative.

7. Description:

The Focus in 2005-2006 The Ferguson Forest Centre demonstration site represents a ‘flagship’ forest demonstration within the EOMF area. In the current fiscal year, activities will focus on reviewing and updating the plan and conducting some harvest operations in over-stocked stands. Fortune Farms has also been an important demonstration site for the EOMF. In the current fiscal year, efforts will be made to use the upgraded demonstration site. Revisions to the technical guide will be made based on client feedback.

-5-


In partnership with Kemptville College (University of Guelph) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, the EOMF will also assist with efforts to inventory the Kemptville College Agroforestry Centre woodlot and upgrade the maple interpretive facility. A further activity will be to facilitate opportunities to develop a landscape demonstration project in Prince Edward County, sharing the experiences of Bog to Bog and the Leeds Landscape Connectivity (‘Lake to Lake’) Project. 8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To promote sustainable forest management through demonstration.

9. Implementation Strategy: 10. Reach:

Increasing use of SFM by landowners and forest workers (Objective 1). Primary Users / Clients: Forest landowners, forest workers, school groups, visitors to the EOMF. Co-Deliverers: A broad range of EOMF partners (e.g., Stewardship Coordinators, Ferguson Forest Centre, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Kemptville College-University of Guelph, etc.). Other Beneficiaries: Canadian Model Forest Network, International Model Forest Network.

-6-


11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$3,000

$5,000 from Ferguson Forest Centre

$10,000 –Time contributed by partners

Total - $3,000

Total - $5,000

Total - $10,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 1) Ferguson Forest Centre Demonstration

Complete

Developed trail guide

Planned harvest.

2) Fortune Farms Demonstration Updated demonstration site information materials. 3) Other - Explored new demonstration site possibilities including update of the Agroforestry Centre woodlot (sugar bush) in partnership with Kemptville College (University of Guelph) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Activities for 2005-2006 Review and update the FFC forest management plan and conduct some harvest operations in over-stocked stands.

March 2006

Encourage use of upgraded Fortune Farms site, and make revisions to the technical guide based on client feedback.

March 2006

Work with the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food and Kemptville College to upgrade the Agroforestry Centre maple facility.

March 2006

Develop inventory for the Agroforestry Centre woodlot.

June 2005

Facilitate opportunities to develop a landscape demonstration project in Prince Edward County, sharing the experiences of Bog to Bog and the Leeds Landscape Connectivity (‘Lake to Lake’) Project.

Ongoing

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • FFC trail guide.

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Fortune Farms technical guide. • Fortune Farms trail update. Deliverables for 2005-2006 Updated FFC plan and associated harvest operations.

March 2006

Revisions to technical guide.

March 2006

-7-


Upgrades to the Agroforestry Centre maple facility.

March 2006

Inventory for the Agroforestry Centre woodlot.

June 2005

Sharing of knowledge relative to landscape demonstration efforts.

Ongoing

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Continued use of existing demonstration sites • Enhanced demonstration sites • Upgraded maple facility at Kemptville College (Agroforestry Centre) 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Enhanced opportunities to promote and demonstrate sustainable forest management principles and practices in an interactive, hands-on way. 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced implementation of sustainable forest practices by forest landowners and forest workers. • Enhanced viability of local demonstration sites which serve as long-term examples of sustainable forest management. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This project is a natural continuation of the EOMF Demonstration Forest program initiated in Phase I. It will not only expand demonstration and education opportunities, but will also show that appropriate management does have significant benefits to the forests of eastern Ontario. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Assessment of project performance will be monitored by the project partners. Performance indicators may include: • Overall usage of the forest demonstration sites (e.g., number of visitors from within and beyond the boundaries of the EOMF). • Feedback on the educational value of visits to the various demonstration sites.

-8-


1. Project Name:

Web-Enabled Forest Management Tool

2. Project #:

1.3/02

3. Project Leader:

Greg Moffatt

4. Partners:

Lead Partner(s) and Role: Eastern Ontario Model Forest will coordinate the development and delivery of the products. Participating Partner(s) and Role: The United Counties of Prescott-Russell are partners in the Rural Economic Development (RED) funding application, and will play a limited role in the guidance of the project. Other partners may include (but are not limited to) provincial government ministries, conservation authorities, municipal governments, forest consultants, and the public. These partners will provide direction, support, and information to facilitate the development of the products.

5. Rationale:

Forest stewards (consultants, municipalities, public) require tools to properly manage their woodlots (maps, inventory sheets, information). The Online Forest Management Tool assists them in practicing sustainable forest management through the online development of components of a forest management plan. With the development of the tool complete, a thorough audit of the tool will be used to identify areas where the functionality and ease-of-use can be improved.

6. Linkages:

The Forest Management Tool builds on the EOMF Code of Forestry Practice and A True Picture: Taking an Inventory of Your Woodlot. Also linked to the tool are the EOMF Forest Certification project, the Information Kiosk, the Observer Network, State of the Forest monitoring and reporting, and the EOMF Web site. In performing the audit, our established partnerships with woodlot owners, forest consultants, and community forest managers will be tapped to ensure that the audit comes from the point-of-view of the end user.

7. Description:

This phase of the project involves establishing an audit team made up of potential end users of the tool (woodlot owners, forest consultants, MFTIP plan writers, and forest consultants), as well as other interested stakeholders (EOMF staff and personnel with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources). An audit strategy will be developed to include such tactics as online surveys and other feedback mechanisms, focus groups, and brainstorming sessions. The results of the audit will be compiled into a document and plan for future development of the Forest Management Tool.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management.

-9-


EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To critically evaluate the Forest Management Tool in terms of its usability and functionality. 2. To develop a plan for improvement and enhancement of the Forest Management Tool. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Increasing use of SFM by landowners and forest workers (Objective 1)

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Landowners, consultants, municipalities, public. Co-Deliverers: United Counties of Prescott-Russell, Boisés Est, audit team (TBD) Other Beneficiaries: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$5,000

$0

UCPR - $1,000 (project guidance) Audit team (TBD) - $2000

Total - $5,000

Total - $0

Total - $3,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 Bulleted list of major activities completed

Complete

• RFP written and released • Winning bid selected • Contract established with Geomap GIS America Inc. • Web-enabled Forest Management Tool developed

- 10 -


• Online Timber Exchange developed Activities for 2005-2006 Identify and assemble an audit team

June 2005

Develop an audit strategy

June 2005

Carry out the audit strategy

July 2005

Compile feedback into a development plan

July 2005

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Online Forest Management Tool

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Online Timber Exchange Deliverables for 2005-2006 Development plan integrating feedback from focus session, Web-based feedback forms, etc. 14. Property Agreements:

July 2005

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced availability, usability, and effectiveness of tools to facilitate the development of forest management plans. • Increased awareness of tools available for forest management planning. • Increased awareness of sustainable forest management concepts and principles, sources of information, and resources for assistance. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Increased use of sustainable forest management techniques and practices. • Increased awareness of sustainable forest management principles. • Increased participation in the Managed Forest Tax Incentive Program (MFTIP). 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • Improvements to the health, quality, and quantity of woodlands in eastern Ontario, particularly in the private woodlot sector. • Landowners and forest stakeholders who are better informed on sustainable forest management. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? Data, techniques and information gathered or created through the mapping department in Phase II are incorporated into this product. Partnerships built in Phase I and II will be strengthened through this collaboration. The EOMF Code of Forestry Practice and its companion document A True Picture: Taking Inventory of Your Woodlot are used as a foundation for the tool. 20. List the performance indicators to be tracked. Web site use will be measured through server logs. A post-audit survey of the audit team will help to gauge the potential effectiveness of the development plan.

- 11 -


1. Project Name:

Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network (EOUFN)

2. Project #:

1.4/02

3. Project Leader:

Jim McCready

4. Partners:

Lead Partner(s) and Role: City of Ottawa – With urban foresters on staff, the City of Ottawa will lead in development of urban forest techniques, official plan input, develop educational programs, and share these efforts with smaller cities, towns and villages in eastern Ontario which do not have the expertise or staff, or depend on volunteers for urban forest programs. National Capital Commission – With urban foresters on staff, the NCC will develop urban forest techniques and education programs which can be shared with smaller municipalities in eastern Ontario. Participating Partner(s) and Role: City of Cornwall, Towns of Carleton Place, Gananoque, Perth, Prescott, Mississippi Mills, Merrickville, Mohawk Community of Akwesasne. These communities are members of the Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network (EOUFN) either by having staff representation or representation from their Advisory Committees. The focus is to promote urban forestry in their respective municipalities.

5. Rationale:

The important role that urban forests play in enhancing quality of life in urban settings is currently not well-understood and recognized amongst local politicians, municipal staff, homeowners and residents, and the public in eastern Ontario. The goal of the Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network is to raise the profile of urban forests in eastern Ontario through better communications between larger and smaller municipalities, through education of those that live and work in the urban setting, through input into official plans and zoning bylaws recognizing trees, and through the use of urban forest techniques which are prescribed by the International Society of Arborists, Landscape Ontario and the Forest Gene Conservation Association.

6. Linkages:

The Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network is linked with the EOMF Communications Committee through the education of homeowners, councilors and municipal staff on the importance and benefits of urban trees. This will be achieved through the delivery of workshops, the development of plain language publications and the creation of a Web site. The Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network is also linked to the Canadian Urban Forest Network, the Council of Ontario Urban Forests, Tree Canada Foundation and the new urban forest network established in British Columbia to promote urban forest polices nationally.

7. Description:

The Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network links individuals, communities and agencies working on urban forest sustainability. • It will transfer urban forest knowledge and science between communities and individuals – in particular, from communities that have the expertise to the many smaller communities, which rely solely on volunteers. • It will help identify new opportunities in terms of public information, education, partnerships, funding and communications. • It will develop and deliver common messages and education to municipalities, communities, and the public in eastern Ontario and beyond. • It will promote urban forest best practices in eastern Ontario • It will promote municipal planning that recognizes and enhances

- 12 -


sustainable urban forests in eastern Ontario and beyond. • It will participate in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy. • It will promote urban forestry by being a strong member of the Canadian Urban Forest Network. 8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To raise the profile of urban forests in eastern Ontario through: • Better communications between larger and smaller municipalities • Education of those that live and work in the urban setting • Input into official plans and zoning by-laws recognizing trees • Use of urban forest techniques which are prescribed by the International Society of Arborists, Landscape Ontario and the Forest Gene Conservation Association. 2. To share EOUFN experiences nationally.

9. Implementation Strategy:

The following Phase III implementation strategies are addressed by this project: • Increasing use of SFM by landowners and forest workers (Objective 1). • Science & information – filling gaps in knowledge of SFM (Objective 1). • Incorporating SFM in local government plans (Objective 2). • Communications & Outreach Plan (Objective 3). • Expanded outreach networks and tools (Objective 4).

- 13 -


• Engaging communities beyond the area of the EOMF (Objective 4). • Participating in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy under the National Forest Strategy (Objective 1) 10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Municipalities in eastern Ontario, municipal staff, councilors, urban forest advisory committees in large cities as well as smaller towns and villages in eastern Ontario, local homeowners, residents, students, volunteers, homeowners. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: International Society of Arborists, Landscape Ontario, Forest Gene Conservation Association, the Council of Ontario Urban Forests, Tree Canada Foundation, Canadian Urban Forest Network, Canadian Model Forest Network, municipalities beyond eastern Ontario.

11. Budget: EOMF $ $3,000

Direct Contributions – Other $ None anticipated.

Total $3,000

Total - $0

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$10,000 – City of Ottawa – staff time, volunteer time, contribution of existing documents such as official plans, travel, display material, use of facilities, assistance to other communities, preparation of news releases. $5,000 – Tree Canada Foundation – staff time, travel and information and statistics on urban forests, preparation of news releases. $2,000 – National Capital Commission – staff time, travel, use of facilities, demonstration areas, displays, assistance to other communities. $7,000 – Town of Carleton Place – volunteer time, administration assistance, documents to smaller communities, assistance to other communities. $2,000 – Town of Gananoque – volunteer time, assistance to other communities, travel. $500 – City of Cornwall – staff time, volunteer time, travel. $ 500 – Town of Prescott – staff time, volunteer time, travel. $500 – Town of Perth – volunteer time, travel. $1,000 – Community of Akwesasne – staff time, volunteer time, travel. $1,000 – Eastern Ontario Biodiversity Museum – staff time, expertise, travel. Total - $29,500

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Produced two press releases dealing with urban forest issues

Complete

• Participated in Ontario East Municipal Conference in Kingston

- 14 -


• Participated in 6 urban forest events / workshops (in Carleton Place, Gananoque,) • Facilitated a special session on invasive species at the national Forest Pest Management Forum in Ottawa • Delivered and prepared a paper for the 6th Urban Forest Conference in Kelowna (and made use of display material) • Participated in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy • Transferred urban forest policies and technology nationally as a member of the Canadian Urban Forest Network • Assisted in establishment of an urban forest network in British Columbia • Prepared draft content for letter to be circulated to municipalities and groups in eastern Ontario concerning the EOUFN and the importance of urban forests. Activities for 2005-2006 Facilitate/coordinate and work with lead agencies on the distribution of information on the Asian longhorned beetle (ALB) and the emerald ash borer (EAB) to communities, practitioners and landowners in eastern Ontario.

Ongoing

Continue to participate in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy.

Ongoing

Participate in advancing the efforts of the Canadian Urban Forest Network presently being housed within the Tree Canada Foundation.

Ongoing

Enhance/update the EOUFN Web site.

Ongoing

Expand membership in the EOUFN by sending letter to municipalities and known groups dealing with urban forestry issues in eastern Ontario and beyond.

December 2005

Produce news releases on urban forests and related issues.

Ongoing

Participate in a number of urban forestry events throughout the year (including use of the display developed last year).

Ongoing

Get on the agendas of municipal workshops to promote the “benefits of trees in your back yard”.

Ongoing

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • 2 press releases

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Participation in 6 urban forest workshops • Participation at Ontario East Municipal Conference • Special session on invasives as part of national Forest Pest Management Forum • Manuscript prepared for 6th Canadian Urban Forest Conference • Draft content for letter to municipalities

- 15 -


Deliverables for 2005-2006 Participation in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy.

March 2006

Participation in the strengthening of the Canadian Urban Forest Network, working with the Tree Canada Foundation.

March 2006

Sessions on ALB/EAB with partners (the goal is 10 sessions).

March 2006

Enhanced EOUFN Web site. Expanded membership in EOUFN (goal is 10 additional communities).

December 2005 December 2005

News releases on urban forestry (goal is to produce 4).

March 2006

Participation in municipal workshops on the benefits of urban forests (goal is to participate in 2). Participation in urban forestry events (goal is to attend 10).

March 2006

14. Property Agreements:

March 2006

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Compilation and sharing of information on urban forests between larger and smaller communities throughout eastern Ontario and beyond. • Development of new urban forest information products to share with individuals, communities and municipalities. • Expansion of membership in the EOUFN. • Enhanced understandings of the importance of urban forests to communities in eastern Ontario and beyond. • Enhanced Canadian Urban Forest Strategy through sharing of EOUFN experiences. • Enhanced bringing together of those working in the urban forest regions across Canada. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Enhanced understanding of urban forestry in eastern Ontario and beyond amongst local politicians, municipal staff, volunteers, homeowners and students. • A strengthened Canadian Urban Forest Network. 18. Long-Term Outcomes • An enhanced urban forest canopy in eastern Ontario. • The development of a Canadian Urban Forest Strategy for the urban forest regions of Canada. • A robust Canadian Urban Forest Network with strong policies, workable best management practices nation-wide, and adequate funding from government at all levels. • Provisions for sustainable urban forests will be better addressed in local official plans and by-laws. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? In Phases I and II of the EOMF, urban forest education was not a strong focus. However, there were some initial education efforts with partners through the delivery of public workshops on urban forestry – in particular following the Ice Storm of 1998. This project will build significantly on this activity by involving a much broader audience and by sharing urban forest messages more widely. The EOUFN will contribute to efforts to develop and deliver a Canadian Urban Forest Strategy as a member of the Canadian Urban Forest Network. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Some of the performance indicators for the project include: • The number of communities that belong to the Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network.

- 16 -


• The extent to which the science of urban forestry is being transferred from the larger centres with expertise (e.g., Ottawa) to the smaller communities lacking expertise. • The number of urban forestry workshops the EOUFN attends / hosts. • The number of participants in urban forest workshops offered. • The use of the Web site to obtain information on urban forests. • The degree to which the experiences of the EOUFN are transferred /shared with the Canadian Urban Forest Network.

- 17 -


1. Project Name:

Non-timber Revenue Opportunities

2. Project #:

1.5/02

3. Project Leader:

Mark Richardson

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF Participating Partner(s) and Role: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association, Ontario Federation of Agriculture, Alfred College, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, others.

5. Rationale:

Non-timber forest products (NTFP) represent a significant benefit to landowners who own non-commercial forests or who are not interested in traditional harvesting as a means of generating revenue. Although products like maple syrup are well known, others like mushrooms, ginseng, and eco-tourism also offer potential opportunities for landowners. Unlike maple syrup production, the economic potential of many other agroforestry opportunities is not as well known by farmers and rural landowners.

6. Linkages:

This project is linked to the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative, as well as other projects within the EOMF.

7. Description:

In the current fiscal year, this project will focus on two main areas: 1) Completing the development of a comprehensive Best Management Practices manual for agroforestry, and 2) Completing the guide to the understory plants of eastern Ontario (commenced in 2004-05, but delayed given the partnership opportunity to develop the abovenoted BMP manual).

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles

- 18 -


and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To increase landowner knowledge of non-timber forest products and agroforestry concepts and practices. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Developing non-timber and timber opportunities (Objective 1).

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Landowners, farmers. Co-Deliverers: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association, Ontario Federation of Agriculture, Alfred College, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Other Beneficiaries: Other resource management organizations.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$2,000

$30,000 – Ontario Federation of Agriculture

$30,000 – Review of materials by task team

Total - $2,000

Total - $30,000

Total - $30,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Developed draft content for the agroforestry Best Management Practices manual.

Complete

• Completed draft of the understory plants publication Activities for 2005-2006 Complete the final text for the agroforestry Best Management Practices manual.

May 2005

Continue to participate with Agroforestry Task Team in the agroforestry Best Management Practices manual development process.

March 2006

Review and finalize the understory plants publication.

March 2006

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Draft content for the agroforestry Best Management Practices manual.

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Draft understory plants publication. Deliverables for 2005-2006 Final text for the agroforestry Best Management Practices manual.

- 19 -

May 2005


Printed agroforestry Best Management Practices manual.

March 2006

Final draft of the understory plants publication.

December 2005

Printed understory plants publication.

March 2006

14. Property Agreements:

None required

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Enhanced availability of information on non-timber forest products and agroforestry. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced knowledge and understandings relative to non-timber forest products and agroforestry. 18. Long-Term Outcomes: • Enhanced benefits to landowners through revenue-generating activities associated with non-timber forest products and agroforestry. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? The EOMF has worked on a number of non-timber forest product projects in the past (e.g., black ash basket making, maple production). This project is a natural extension of these past efforts. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Performance indicators may include: • Range of materials developed to improve understandings of non-timber forest products and agroforestry. • Uptake of information on non-timber forest products and agroforestry (e.g., number of requests for reports). • Level of awareness of non-timber forest products and agroforestry concepts and practices based on, for instance, information gleaned from the EOMF end-of-Phase III survey.

- 20 -


1. Project Name:

Timber Product Revenue Opportunities

2. Project #:

1.6/02

3. Project Leader:

Mark Richardson

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF Participating Partner(s) and Role: Local Stewardship Councils, private landowners, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.

5. Rationale:

There has been considerable ongoing debate over what to do with the numerous unmanaged plantations owned by former WIA participants as well as other landowners. It is estimated that the total area for these plantations could be in excess of 15000 ha. There presently is no lead agency willing to address the issue on managing the thousands of acres of conifer plantations planted during the WIA program. There is a need for facilitation of a management effort that considers the longterm sustainability of these important elements of the ecological landscape.

6. Linkages:

This project has linkages to the Landowner Workshop Series (a course on conifer plantation management has been developed and delivered), as well as to certification efforts underway.

7. Description:

Over the course of 2002-2003 and 2003-2004, the EOMF facilitated several discussion sessions with the owners of WIA agreement forests and other privately held lands to stimulate thinking about the long-term sustainability of these important forest areas. The Focus in 2005-2006 The EOMF will continue this work in 2005-2006 with further facilitated sessions and discussions. As part of efforts, a discussion paper on woodlot economics for private landowners will be produced. There is also an opportunity to involve these forest owners in ongoing forest certification efforts. This will be further explored as part of the current year’s activities as well.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario.

- 21 -


5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To work toward ensuring that eastern Ontario’s conifer plantations are wellmanaged in the long-term. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Developing timber and non-timber opportunities (Objective 1).

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Plantation owners, forest owners. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Residents of eastern Ontario, all of society.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$2,000

None anticipated

$2,000 – Time of Certification Working Group, Forests & Climate Change Working Group members.

Total - $2,000

Total - $0

Total - $2,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Several informal discussion sessions held with local Stewardship Coordinators

Complete

• Informal discussions held in conjunction with the FAACS landowner incentive focus sessions • Hosted plantation tour in Limerick Forest Activities for 2005-2006 Continue to assist with facilitated discussions / sessions.

Ongoing

Produce discussion paper on woodlot economics for private landowners.

March 2006

- 22 -


13. Deliverables: Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Discussions with WIA agreement forest owners (and other owners of privately-held lands).

Complete

• Tour of Limerick Forest Deliverables for 2005-2006 Facilitated discussions / sessions.

Ongoing

Discussion paper on woodlot economics for private landowners.

March 2006

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Identification of opportunities relative to the long-term sustainability of WIA agreement forests (and other privately-held forests). 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced collaboration on a strategy for ensuring the long-term sustainability of WIA agreement forests (and other privately-held forests). 18. Long-Term Outcomes: • Increased health and quality of former WIA plantations and other privately-held forests. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This project will build on past EOMF efforts at landowner education such as the delivery of the landowner workshop series and demonstration forest activities. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Activities and deliverables will be monitored and reviewed by the Certification Working Group and the Forests & Climate Change Working Group.

- 23 -


1. Project Name:

Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative

2. Project #:

1.7/02

3. Project Leader:

Scott Davis

4. Partners:

Lead and Role: EOMF Certification Working Group Participating Partner(s) and Role: Ontario Woodlot Association, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Domtar Inc. (Cornwall), Ontario Forestry Association, Forest Stewardship Council of Canada, Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, Eastern Ontario Certified Forest Owners, Ontario Maple Syrup Producers, Canadian Model Forest Network, Canadian Forest Service, Mississippi Valley Field Naturalist, BoisĂŠs Est (Francophone Woodlot Association of Eastern Ontario), Community Stewardship Councils of Leeds and Grenville and Lanark, Limerick Forest Advisory Committee. The role of the partners is to provide guidance and input to project direction through the Certification Working Group. The EOMF will facilitate the design and implementation of a small woodlot owner group certification pilot project.

5. Rationale:

Increasingly certification is a topic of interest in Canada and worldwide. Already many European countries, and some large North American retailers, are requiring that forest products coming from Canada (and elsewhere) are derived from certified forests. The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Forest Region holds a major portion of Canada’s harvestable timber, and local woodlot owners and small processors of wood products have a great opportunity to get certified by these new standards. Consequently, developing and implementing a system of certification that is appropriate in an eastern Ontario context (with many small, private landholdings) has become of real importance. Nearly 17% of the Canadian wood supply comes from private forests, thus stressing the importance of forest certification on the landscape in eastern Ontario. The EOMF will transfer the lessons learned to other individuals and organizations interested in forest certification for small private woodlots in Ontario and beyond.

6. Linkages:

Workshops developed under the Landowner Workshop Series have been incorporated into the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative. This linkage will continue into 2005-2006. Demonstration forests within the EOMF already serve as educational tools to introduce landowners to sustainable management options. As an extension of this role, existing EOMF demonstration sites will be used specifically to help landowners in interpreting the application of certification on private lands. A further linkage is to the EOMF Mapping & Information Group which will assist in the development of property maps needed for the certification initiative. The EOMF has developed linkages with other model forests throughout Canada by information exchange sessions in 2004 and this will continue in the current fiscal year.

7. Description:

Certification can be used as a highly effective tool to promote sustainable forest practices on the ground, along with promoting the community benefits of wellmanaged forests. This project will apply the Forest Stewardship Council system as an option for certification for the private land base of eastern Ontario. The EOMF model will demonstrate private land certification and will act as a catalyst for other groups interested in certification initiatives in Ontario and beyond. .

- 24 -


The Focus in 2005-2006 Following the December 2002 audit by SmartWood, the EOMF has been certified as a Resource Manager in accordance with the Principles and Criteria of the Forest Stewardship Council. The efforts in 2005-2006 will focus on the growth of the existing landowner cluster and establish another group of forest owners in another region of eastern Ontario. The sharing of experiences and transfer of knowledge relative to certification in settled landscapes with others outside the area of the EOMF will also be pivotal in 2005-2006. Possibilities for establishing additional nodes for certification both within and beyond the area of the EOMF will also be investigated. In particular, opportunities for sharing knowledge of woodlot owner certification with other model forests (e.g., Fundy Model Forest, Bas St. Laurent, Nova Forest Alliance) will be pursued. The Certification Working Group, through the project leader, will be responsible for leading these outreach efforts. 8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contributes to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation Project Objectives: 1. To test the application of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) system as an option for forest certification in the context of the settled landscape of eastern Ontario. 2. To share experiences and transfer knowledge relative to private land certification in settled landscapes, both within and beyond the area of the EOMF.

- 25 -


3. To explore other private land forestry models for private land forestry certification. 9. Implementation Strategy: 10. Reach:

Sustainable forest management delivery and certification (Objective 1). Primary Users / Clients: Private woodlot owners, forest practitioners, forest industries, and forest businesses (both primary and secondary). Indirectly, consumers of forest products will be targeted. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Other model forests, other groups and organizations interested in certification as applied to small, private woodlots (settled landscapes).

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$53,000

The EOMF has submitted an Ontario Trillium Funding Proposal for a 3-year period beginning April 1, 2005. .

Activities of the Certification Working Group, EOCFO volunteers and the HRDC Project for EOCFO members.

$220,000 (pending Ontario Trillium Foundation approval)

$175,000

Total - $220,000

Total - $175,000

Total - $53,000 12. Activities:

Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Lanark Stewardship Council HRDC Crew work completed on EOCFO member woodlots – 26 woodlots (representing 267 acres) had forest stand improvement work done

Complete

• Held certification meetings with Fundy Model Forest and Eel Ground First Nations • Delivered forest certification presentation to Lanark Highlands Council • Completed SmartWood Annual Surveillance Audit • Led field tour for the National Private Woodlot Conference ‘Meeting the Stewardship Challenge’ at the Dolan Woodlot • Delivered certification presentation to the Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa • Conducted Eastern Ontario Certified Forest Owners AGM • Delivered certification presentation to Renfrew County Forestry Stewardship Committee • Attended Certification Watch Conference in Vancouver • Attended Westwind Forestry Conference • Delivered certification presentation to Algonquin College

- 26 -


• Held Limerick Forest Advisory Committee certification meeting • Delivered certification presentation at the joint CIF-SAF conference in Edmonton • Delivered certification presentation to Community Forest Managers in Ontario Activities for 2005-2006 Author a Guide to Forest Certification on Community-Based Forests in Ontario.

October 2005

Work towards FSC Certification for Limerick Forest with the involvement of the Limerick Forest Advisory Committee.

Ongoing

Certification coordinator to keep abreast of new and emerging forest certification systems as applicable to private land.

Ongoing

Establish a new cluster of FSC-certified forest owners in the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville.

September 2005

Continue with communications and outreach efforts (e.g., workshops, presentations, conference participation, etc.).

Ongoing

Continue industrial partnerships through dialogue and site visits.

Ongoing

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Biodiversity Indicators workshop at Usher woodlot

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Wetlands & Woodlands workshop at Rymal woodlot • Non Timber Forest Products workshop at Fortune woodlot • Wealth and Woodlots Financial Management workshop • 8 new forest owners (representing 2567 acres) joined the Eastern Ontario Certified Forest Owners in 2004 Deliverables for 2005-2006 First Nations Values Identification workshop for forest managers in eastern Ontario in partnership with Akwesasne and OMNR.

April 2005

Certification coordinator to ensure conditions of EOMF certification are met (implement HCVF condition through policy implementation).

Ongoing

Tree Marking workshop for landowners.

May 2005

Workshop on Old Growth Forests in eastern Ontario.

June 2005

Guided field trip proposed to Gilles Grove by EOCFO.

June 2005

Financial Management workshop # 2.

December 2005

Guide to Forest Certification on Community-Based Forests in Ontario.

October 2005

Dialogue and site visits with participating and new industrial partners.

Ongoing

14. Property Agreements:

Landowner MOU.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening

- 27 -


16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Increased landowner awareness of the benefits of forest certification. • Enhanced understandings of how certification can be applied to small, private woodlands in eastern Ontario and in other settled landscapes and model forests. • Enhanced landowner knowledge through education of the principles and criteria relating to sustainable forest management. • Landowner education of sustainable forestry through workshops and field visits. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Expansion of FSC certification for small, private woodlots in eastern Ontario and beyond. • New certification nodes in eastern Ontario and beyond. • Act as a local Resource Center for individuals and groups interested in forest certification. 18. Long-Term Outcomes • On-the-ground application of sustainable forest management principles in eastern Ontario and beyond. • Increased consumer demand for products from well-managed forests. • Protection of multiple forest values. • Economic benefits to landowners, practitioners and operators practicing certified wood production. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? Certification efforts in 2005-2006 will build upon the solid foundation generated in Phase II. The certification audit that was initiated at the end of Phase II has been completed and the EOMF forest management certificate received. Building on this, the focus for Phase III will be to expand certification for owners of small, private woodlands. This will be achieved by building on the certification “cluster” established in Phase II in Lanark County, as well as by establishing new nodes for landowner certification within and beyond the area of the EOMF. Increased collaboration with other model forests on private woodlots will also build on efforts in Phase II. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. The Certification Working Group will oversee the delivery of the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative. Some of the performance indicators that will be used to track progress of the project include: • The number of participants in the various certification clusters and nodes. • The total acreage certified. • The volume of certified product. • The SmartWood audit results. • Participation by local forest industry. • Ability to transfer lessons learned to other interested individuals and groups. • Number of educational workshops delivered through the project.

- 28 -


1. Project Name:

Landowner Education

2. Project #:

1.8/02

3. Project Leader:

Mark Richardson

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF Participating Partner(s) and Role: A broad range of EOMF partners will be involved in the delivery of the various landowner-related activities and projects.

5. Rationale:

Effecting sustainable forest management on the ground in eastern Ontario is, in large part, dependent on our ability to reach landowners with the information, knowledge and tools to help them make informed forest management decisions. Given the large number of private landowners in the Eastern Ontario Model Forest, a staff liaison is viewed as critical in providing technical forestry expertise and communicating SFM messages through various landowner-related project activities.

6. Linkages:

This project is linked intimately with all EOMF projects involving private landowners (particularly under EOMF Objective 1, as well as under Objectives 2 and 3). Examples include: the Landowner Workshop Series, the Demonstration Forest Initiative, the Non-Timber Revenue Opportunities Project, the Timber Product Revenue Project, the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative, the Community and Former Agreement Forest Areas Project, and the Strategic Planting and Extension efforts under Objective 2. Sharing experiences and project outcomes beyond the boundaries of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest is central to this project as well (EOMF Objective 4).

7. Description:

This project supports a staff liaison in the provision of technical forestry expertise to landowners through various landowner-related activities and projects.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health.

- 29 -


5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To provide technical forestry expertise to landowners. 2. To communicate sustainable forest management messages with landowners. 3. To share experiences and project outcomes within and beyond the area of the EOMF. 9. Implementation Strategy:

10. Reach:

Increasing use of SFM by landowners and forest workers (Objective 1); Developing non-timber and timber opportunities (Objective 1); SFM delivery and certification (Objective 1); Strengthening strategic planting and extension (Objective 2); Expanding outreach networks and tools beyond the boundaries of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest (Objective 4). Primary Users / Clients: Landowners are the key target audience. Co-Deliverers: A broad range of EOMF partners. Other Beneficiaries: All partners will benefit from activity associated with this project.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$40,000

None anticipated

$10,000 Contributions of partners.

Total - $40,000

Total - $0

Total - $10,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • See the ‘Progress’ section for Activities (Section 12) for the following projects: - 1.1 Landowner Workshop Series - 1.2 Demonstration Forest Initiative - 1.5 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities - 1.6 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities - 2.3 Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration - 2.4 Strategic Planting Initiative • Drafted the content for a comprehensive agroforestry Best Management Practices manual

- 30 -

Complete


Activities for 2005-2006 Provide support to the various landowner-related projects listed above (please refer to the respective work plans in this document)

March 2006

Additional activities: - Revise the EOMF Code of Forestry Practice - Facilitate opportunities to develop a landscape demonstration in Prince Edward County - Support various beyond-the-boundaries efforts, especially those involving landowners (e.g., field tours and visits, etc.)

March 2006

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

13. Deliverables:

Progress in 2004-2005 • See the ‘Progress’ section for Deliverables (Section 13) for the following projects: - 1.1 Landowner Workshop Series - 1.2 Demonstration Forest Initiative - 1.5 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities - 1.6 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities - 2.3 Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration - 2.4 Strategic Planting Initiative

Complete

• Draft content for agroforestry Best Management Practices manual Deliverables for 2005-2006 Please refer to the ‘Deliverables’ section (Section 13) for the respective projects listed above.

March 2006

Revised Code of Forestry Practice.

March 2006

Support to beyond-the-boundaries efforts (e.g., field tours, visits, etc.).

Ongoing

14. Property Agreements:

None required

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Increased sharing of forestry expertise and SFM messages directly with private landowners in eastern Ontario and beyond. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • An expanded group of knowledgeable landowners who are aware of, and committed to, sustainable forest management principles and practices. 18. Long-Term Outcomes: • Enhanced adoption and implementation of SFM principles and practices by landowners in eastern Ontario and beyond. • Forest sustainability and increased biodiversity across the landscape of eastern Ontario.

- 31 -


19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? Broadening our influence with landowners in eastern Ontario remains central in Phase III. This project will build on the many successful landowner education efforts in Phases I and II, including workshop development and delivery, demonstration forest development, expansion of forest certification work with private landowners, and strategic planting and extension efforts through the Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration Project and the Strategic Planting Initiative. 20. List the performance indicators to be tracked. The degree to which EOMF efforts reach landowners in Phase III will be reflected in a planned end-ofPhase III survey, similar to that conducted at the end of Phase II. Performance indicators for each of the projects alluded to above (Sections 12 and 13) are outlined in their respective work plans.

- 32 -


1. Project Name:

Recognition Program

2. Project #:

1.9/02

3. Project Leader:

EOMF

4. Partners:

Lead Partner and Role: EOMF Communications Committee, Nominating & Awards Committee. Participating Partner(s) and Role: Stewardship Councils, Wildlife Habitat Canada, North Grenville District High School, St. Michael’s Catholic High School, others. The EOMF Communications Committee, with assistance from the Nominating & Awards Committee, will oversee the coordination of the activities and deliverables under this project. The partners listed above will facilitate recognition efforts.

5. Rationale:

Recognizing those who contribute to the EOMF vision is a positive means of acknowledging good work and motivating others to follow by example. In Phase II, outstanding efforts toward sustainable forest management were recognized through various means including certificates and plaques of achievement, partnership signs, through the presentation of the Ross Silversides Forestry Award, as well as through nominations to existing recognition programs such as the Forest Stewardship Recognition Program. The EOMF views these efforts at recognition as paramount in Phase III as well.

6. Linkages:

This project is closely linked with the EOMF Communications & Outreach program. It also has linkages to a number of other EOMF projects and activities including the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative and demonstration forest efforts.

7. Description:

Via this project, the EOMF will build on Phase II efforts at recognizing outstanding contributions to sustainable forests by landowners and forest stewards. Opportunities for developing awards to recognize contributions by other individuals, groups and communities (e.g., youth, women in the model forest, schools) will be explored. The Focus in 2005-2006 In addition to the many ongoing recognition activities alluded to in Section 5 above, efforts will focus on further refining the process associated with the Eastern Ontario Model Forest Environmental Award (developed in 2003-2004). A new thrust for the current fiscal year will be to refine the criteria and process for delivery of the new EOMF volunteerism award – known as the ‘Heartwood Award’. The award will be presented for the first time at the May 7, 2005 Annual Spring Gathering & AGM. The Communications Committee will also explore opportunities for recognizing women through an award and/or special event (e.g., a “Women of Influence in Conservation” symposium).

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries.

- 33 -


5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To recognize outstanding efforts toward sustainable forest management. 9. Implementation Strategy:

10. Reach:

Recognizing people and outstanding efforts toward sustainable forest management (Objective 1). Primary Users / Clients: Landowners, forest stewards, forest workers, schools, youth, municipalities, others. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: All of society.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$2,000

None anticipated.

$2,000 – Time contributed by Communications Committee and Nominating & Awards Committee; Partner support in developing nominations $1,000 – Time and materials contributed to development of the Heartwood Award (central plaque and take home award)

Total - $2,000

Total - $0

Total - $3,000

- 34 -


12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Continued with ongoing recognition efforts through the Ross Silversides Forestry Award, etc.

Complete

• Continued to refine the EOMF Environmental Award process • Awarded the EOMF Environmental Award to 2 local high school students • Developed criteria for the new “Heartwood Award” aimed at recognizing exceptional volunteer efforts • Developed a thank-you plaque for interns, students and others who assist the EOMF with various projects. Activities for 2005-2006 Continue to recognize outstanding efforts toward sustainable forests via certificates of achievement, partnership signs, the Ross Silversides Forestry Award, nominations to existing recognition programs, and the EOMF Environmental Award.

Ongoing

Refine the criteria (and process for delivery) of the new EOMF volunteerism award – known as the “Heartwood Award”.

April 2005

Present (launch) the Heartwood Award at the May 7, 2005 Annual Spring Gathering & AGM. Explore opportunities for recognizing women through an award and/or special event (e.g., a “Women of Influence in Conservation” symposium). Continue to explore, develop and implement new awards as appropriate.

May 2005

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Presentations of the various awards (and recognition products)

Complete

March 2006

Ongoing

13. Deliverables:

• Criteria for the Heartwood Award • Thank-you plaque for interns, students, others Deliverables for 2005-2006 Presentations of recognition awards.

Ongoing

Recognition products (e.g., certificates, plaques of achievement, partnership signs, scrolls, etc.).

Ongoing

Launch of EOMF Heartwood Award.

May 2005

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced recognition of landowners and others making special contributions to sustainable forests.

- 35 -


17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced leadership on the part of those doing good work, resulting in neighbour / community uptake of sustainable forest management practices. • Greater EOMF and Canadian Model Forest Network visibility. 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • More widespread adoption and uptake of sustainable forest management practices by landowners and others within and beyond eastern Ontario. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This project will build on recognition efforts made throughout Phases I and II by exploring new and innovative recognition opportunities. 20. List the performance indicators to be tracked. Performance indicators may include: • Number of EOMF landowners, members, residents recognized via special awards. • Success of nominations put forward to other partner organizations. • Timely development and implementation of new recognition opportunities.

- 36 -


1. Project Name:

Science Management

2. Project #:

1.11/03

3. Project Leader:

Forest Science Committee Chair

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF Forest Science Committee (FSC) Participating Partner(s) and Role: EOMF scientists, researchers, field workers, consultants, and a wide range of resource management organizations and educational and environmental institutions.

5. Rationale:

Given the amount of forest-related science being undertaken within the EOMF, there is a need for regular review of activities to (i) identify gaps and overlaps, (ii) ensure that science-related work and knowledge is shared, (iii) ensure that there is consistency in EOMF projects, (iv) ensure the use of the most up-to-date scientific and technological knowledge within the programs and activities of the EOMF, and (v) identify science-related challenges and opportunities for the EOMF to pursue.

6. Linkages:

This project is linked intimately with all projects that embody science components. The Forest Science Committee plays a particularly vital role in driving and overseeing the Criteria and Indicators / State of the Forest Monitoring and Reporting Project. Committee efforts are also linked to the Desired Future Forest Condition Plan Project, the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative and other landscape-level and land-based initiatives.

7. Description:

The Forest Science Committee is mandated with providing advice and feedback to the EOFG board of directors on funding and management of science-related projects and activities with particular emphasis on Phase III, Objective 1 “Increasing the Quality and Health of Forest Ecosystems” and Phase III, Objective 2, “Increasing Forest Cover Across the Landscape”. The Forest Science Committee will continue to provide advice and guidance to the EOMF from a forest science point of view. Implementing the science strategy developed in 2003-2004 will provide a focus for efforts. In particular, the Forest Science Committee will play a critical role in guiding state of the forest monitoring and reporting efforts. In addition to overseeing state of the forest efforts, a focus for the FSC in 2005-2006 will be to provide guidance to the Future Forest Condition project.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management.

- 37 -


EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To provide advice and feedback to the EOFG board of directors on funding and management of science-related projects and activities. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Science and information – filling gaps in knowledge of sustainable forest management (Objective 1); Developing a Future Forest Condition Plan (Objective 2); State of the forest monitoring and reporting (Objective 2).

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Landowners and forest workers, scientists, government and non-government resource management agencies, universities. Co-Deliverers: Other committees and working groups of the EOMF. Other Beneficiaries: The public.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$1,000

None anticipated.

$2,500 – Volunteer time of FSC members, EOMF staff.

Total - $1,000

Total - $0

Total - $2,500

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Held 2 regular meetings of the FSC

Complete

• Held 2 scoping sessions dealing with the Future Forest Condition project • Delivered presentation on model forest science at the joint CIF-SAF conference in Edmonton • Delivered presentation on model forest science for Model Forest Day at NRCan • Presented the State of the Forest project and Web site to the Canadian Sustainability Indicators Network (CSIN) as part of

- 38 -


their learning workshop on indicator initiatives • Created a private FSC forum in support of science management Activities for 2005-2006 Provide support, advice and guidance to science related projects, particularly those under Phase III Objectives 1 & 2.

Ongoing

Hold regular meetings of the FSC.

Quarterly

Report periodically to the EOMF board of directors.

Monthly / as requested

Participate in semi-annual and annual review of science-related projects.

September 2005 / February 2006

Provide advice and guidance to ongoing state of the forest monitoring and reporting efforts and future forest condition work.

Ongoing

Implement science strategy developed in 2003-2004.

Ongoing

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • 2 regular meetings of the FSC

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• 2 scoping meetings relative to the Future Forest Condition • Delivery of model forest science presentation at CIF-SAF conference and Model Forest Day at NRCan • Presentation to CSIN on State of the Forest efforts • Private FSC forum Deliverables for 2005-2006 FSC meetings and minutes of meetings.

Quarterly

Periodic reports to the EOMF Board of Directors.

Monthly / as requested September 2005 / February 2006

Input to semi-annual and annual review of EOMF projects. Support to science projects (e.g., review of manuscripts, reports, etc.).

Ongoing

Implementation of science strategy.

Ongoing

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Enhanced support and guidance to science-related projects of the EOMF. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Enhanced dissemination of the results of science-related work. • Enhanced sharing of forest science knowledge gained by the EOMF. • A coordinated science program that supports the vision and objectives of the EOMF.

- 39 -


18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity • A greater wealth of forest science knowledge in eastern Ontario and beyond. • Enhanced implementation of the results of forest science research by landowners and others within and beyond the EOMF. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? The Forest Science Committee played a pivotal role in advancing the science efforts of the EOMF in Phase II. The efforts of the committee were particularly instrumental in seeing through to fruition the completion of a first State of the Forest Report for the EOMF. The FSC will build on this significant accomplishment by overseeing the Phase III State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting program. The committee will also continue to play a role in supporting and guiding other science activities of the EOMF, further strengthening the science foundation laid in Phases I and II. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Both periodic internal self-evaluations by the FSC and external evaluations of the FSC by the Eastern Ontario Forest Group will be undertaken. Performance indicators may include: • Timely completion of state of the forest pieces for reporting purposes. • Number and range of projects / strategies initiated to address identified science and information priorities.

- 40 -


1. Project Name:

Biodiversity Indicators for Woodland Owners (Observer Network)

2. Project #:

1.12/03

3. Project Leader:

EOMF

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF (Forest Science Committee). Participating: Landowners (observers), biodiversity researchers and scientists, Eastern Ontario Biodiversity Museum, Canadian Biodiversity Institute, Leeds County Stewardship (and other eastern Ontario Stewardship Councils), Limerick Forest Advisory Committee, A2A Conservation Association (Rideau-St. Lawrence Chapter).

5. Rationale:

There is a need to expand and enhance the capacity for biodiversity monitoring in eastern Ontario. This project is based on the knowledge that we have many interested and skilled landowners (observers) who walk and engage in recreational activities in our forests, wetlands and meadows on a regular basis. These individuals can gather valuable information on biodiversity in the EOMF. By developing standard observation protocols, training observers, and developing a regional database, we can build a valuable base of information about the habitat and species occurrences in eastern Ontario over time, as well as threats to ecosystems such as insects, diseases, invasive exotics and natural disturbances. There is also a crucial need to provide landowners with sound information and guidance relative to what they can do on their properties with respect to maintaining and enhancing biodiversity.

6. Linkages:

This project builds on the work carried out in Phase II under the Eastern Ontario Natural History Observers Network. Criteria and standards developed by the Observer Network will be linked with other EOMF programs including the Bogto-Bog Landscape Demonstration Initiative, the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative, and the Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest Monitoring and Reporting initiative. There is also a clear linkage with the Landowner Workshop (Course-in-a-Box) Series. The project will also link with other monitoring programs on the landscape through data sharing.

7. Description:

This project will continue the evolution of the Eastern Ontario Natural History Observers Network initiated by the Canadian Biodiversity Institute and the Eastern Ontario Model Forest in Phase II. Efforts under this project have focused on the development of observation protocols and tools, along with the delivery of landowner training sessions dealing with monitoring and maintaining biodiversity. Efforts have also been directed at encouraging participation in the Observer Network, with a group of 16 landowners recruited to date. The Focus in 2005-2006 Populating the Observer Network Web site (developed in 2004-2005) with past data recorded by the existing group of observers will be a key focus of efforts in the current fiscal year. Involving this same group of observers in another spring biodiversity data collection effort, and subsequent reporting effort, will be another key activity. Further to this, an assessment of the data collection and input process will be conducted. An assessment report will be produced. The results of the assessment will be incorporated into a funding proposal to leverage funds to support ongoing Observer Network efforts.

- 41 -


Opportunities for packaging the existing training materials into a course-in-abox format will also be explored. This will be accompanied by ongoing efforts to expand participation in the Observer Network and to promote the existing suite of training protocols and tools. 8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To expand and enhance the capacity for biodiversity monitoring in eastern Ontario. 2. To provide landowners (observers) with sound information and guidance relative to what they can do on their properties with respect to maintaining and enhancing biodiversity.

9. Implementation Strategy:

10. Reach:

Science and information – filling gaps in knowledge of sustainable forest management (Objective 1). Primary Users / Clients: Landowners (observers), EOMF members. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Naturalists, organizations concerned with biodiversity and conservation issues.

- 42 -


11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$0

$4,500 – Contribution from OMNR.

$4,000 Volunteer time of observers, partners, project leader; EOMF staff support

Total - $0

Total - $4,500

Total - $4,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Biodiversity manual produced as EOMF Information Report 60(a)

Complete

• Detailed overview of Observer Network produced as EOMF Information Report 60(b) • Biodiversity compendium finalized • Extension note content revised (with final editing and desktopping to be completed in the coming year with support from FGCA) • PowerPoint presentation on the Observer Network project finalized • Held 4 training / information sessions • Recruited 9 new participants to the Observer Network • Observer Network Web site developed (including observation tally sheets/forms) Activities for 2005-2006 Populate the Observer Network Web site with past data recorded by participants in the Observer Network. Involve existing observer group in a spring (2005) biodiversity data collection effort, and subsequent reporting effort. Conduct an assessment of the data collection/input process and produce assessment report.

April 2005 May 2005 July 2005

Develop funding proposal to support ongoing Observer Network efforts.

September 2005

Explore opportunities for packaging the existing training materials into a course-in-a-box format.

Ongoing

Continue with efforts to expand the Observer Network.

Ongoing

Enhance promotion of training protocols and tools developed under the Observer Network project (including Observer Network Web Site).

Ongoing

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Information Reports 60(a) and 60(b)

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Biodiversity compendium • Revised extension note content

- 43 -


• PowerPoint presentation on the Observer Network • 4 training / information sessions • 9 new members recruited to the Observer Network • Observer Network Web site Deliverables for 2005-2006 Populated Observer Network Web site.

May 2005

Spring biodiversity data collection and reporting effort with observers.

May 2005

Data collection/input assessment and associated assessment report.

July 2005

Funding proposal to support ongoing Observer Network efforts.

September 2005

14. Property Agreements: Property access and data sharing agreements to be developed as required by the project leader. 15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced inventorying and monitoring protocols available to landowners / observers • Enhanced suite of educational materials available to landowners / observers (e.g., extension notes, compendium document). • Enhanced promotion of the Observer Network through development of communications materials. • Enhanced training for landowners relative to maintaining / enhancing biodiversity. • Enhanced support for the continuation and expansion of the network of observers. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Increased awareness of the importance of maintaining / enhancing forest biodiversity. • Increased pool of reliable data relative to biodiversity in eastern Ontario. 18. Long-Term Outcomes: • A broad network of landowners / observers dedicated to inventorying and monitoring aspects of biodiversity and sustainability in eastern Ontario. • Enhanced ability to report on state of the forest biodiversity. • Enhanced biodiversity conservation across the landscape of eastern Ontario. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This work continues the evolution of the Eastern Ontario Natural History Observers Network initiated in Phase II. The project will refine the suite of educational and training-related materials developed in Phase II. It will also enhance training opportunities for landowners relative to maintaining biodiversity – an extension of the Landowner Workshops (Course-in-a-Box) project. Further building on Phase II efforts, the CommunityNatureWatch Web site also serves as a repository for biodiversity observations and data. Observations and data also feed into ongoing state of the forest monitoring and reporting efforts. 20. List the performance indicators to be tracked. Performance indicators may include: • Number of participants in the Observer Network. • Number of participants at training sessions; Number of training sessions. • Number of Biodiversity Monitoring Plans developed. • Number of requests for information on biodiversity monitoring (e.g., number of requests for Observer Network training manual).

- 44 -


1. Project Name:

Sustainable Forest Management in Local Government Plans

2. Project #:

2.1/02

3. Project Leader:

Greg Moffatt

4. Partners:

Lead Partner(s) and Role: EOMF (Equity Committee) will continue to seek additional funding for this project. Meanwhile, the project leader will attend to preparatory tasks outlined below through the allocated EOMF funding. Participating Partner(s) and Role: Federal and provincial government ministries, environmental organizations, non-profit organizations, conservation authorities, and municipal governments. These partners will provide direction, support and information to facilitate the development of the products.

5. Rationale:

Decision makers at the municipal level will be better positioned to make more informed decisions regarding the environment once armed with the most current sustainable forest management and science-based information.

6. Linkages:

Some of the information developed through this project will complement the Information Kiosk (initiated in Phase II), Woodland Valuation System, C&I / State of the Forest efforts, as well as the transfer of knowledge beyond the EOMF boundaries.

7. Description:

Given the pressures placed on wooded areas in our settled landscape, given the requirements for addressing woodlands in the Provincial Policy Statement, and also given the turnover of the management of former agreement forest areas from the Ministry of Natural Resources to the municipalities, decision-makers in local government are continually faced with addressing complex and wideranging forest-related issues. At the same time, municipalities are limited in human and financial resources, and finding the information needed to deal with these issues can be a challenge. Encouraging and assisting municipal governments in addressing forest-related issues in eastern Ontario has long been considered a high priority for the EOMF, and this project aims at connecting municipal governments with up-to-date, understandable, and accurate information to help them in their policy and decision-making efforts. The Focus in 2005-2006 In 2005-2006, funding for the project will continue to be sought, and to support these efforts, a business case for a re-scoped “Municipal Guidebook� will be prepared. Rather than compiling and preparing a broad-scope document of current, science-based information into a plain-language guidebook, we plan to take advantage of the expertise shown by the municipalities themselves. While there may not be a municipality in eastern Ontario that is adept at handling all forest-related issues, there are certainly many that can serve as examples to others in certain aspects of sustainable forest management. The document to be prepared under this project will be comprised of a set of examples and case studies where municipalities have shown outstanding and innovative work on a variety of forest-related issues. A business case for this document will be prepared as a tool for the EOMF Equity Committee to use to generate funding to continue the project. The scope of the document will be established, case studies will be identified, and preliminary contacts will be made with municipalities in the region.

- 45 -


Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries.

8. Objectives:

5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: The business case for the Guidebook will provide a starting point for development of the document, and will also serve as a tool which the EOMF Equity Committee can use to seek additional funding for the project. 9. Implementation Strategy: 10. Reach:

Incorporating SFM in local government plans (Objective 2). Primary Users / Clients: Decision makers in municipal governments in eastern Ontario Co-Deliverers: Municipal governments in eastern Ontario Other Beneficiaries: Municipal governments elsewhere.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$5,000

$0

$2,000 – Municipal governments in eastern Ontario (input and direction)

Total - $5,000

Total - $0

Total - $2,000

- 46 -


12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Woodland Valuation System exhibited at the Ontario East Municipal Conference (September 2004)

Complete

• A technical poster was developed for Linking Landscapes, a conference held in Dorset in October, 2004 • Created printable WVS maps by OBM tile for all of eastern Ontario and posted on the Web site Activities for 2005-2006 Develop a business case for the Guidebook

May 2005

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Printable WVS maps (posted on the Web site)

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Technical poster (posted on the Web site) • Approximately 1,000 unique visitors to the Web site in the 2004 calendar year; bandwidth (downloads and page views) amounted to 1.50 GB over the same period. • The PDF WVS report was downloaded 76 times in the 2004 calendar year; the PowerPoint presentation was downloaded 59 times. Deliverables for 2005-2006 Guidebook business case. 14. Property Agreements:

May 2005

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • A starting point and strategy for the development of the Municipal Guidebook. • A marketing tool to be used by the EOMF Equity Committee in seeking project funding. • Improved communication and partnerships with municipal governments. • An improved understanding of the work of municipal governments with respect to sustainable forest management. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Facilitated development of the Municipal Guidebook. • Improved dissemination of the Guidebook to municipal and other decision makers. • Buy-in of municipal governments to the concept and effectiveness of the Guidebook.

- 47 -


18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • Implementation of the sustainable forest management principles and practices contained within the Guidebook by municipal and other decision makers. • Enhanced commitment to, support for, and implementation of sustainable forest management in eastern Ontario and beyond. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? Data and information gathered and created through the EOMF Mapping and Information Group in Phase II will be incorporated into the guidebook. Partnerships established in earlier phases will be strengthened through this exercise. 20. List the performance indicators to be tracked. The ability of the EOMF Equity Committee to acquire funding to support the project will be a key indicator of success.

- 48 -


1. Project Name:

Desired Future Forest Condition Pilot Project

2. Project #:

2.2/02

3. Project Leader:

Forest Science Committee / Mark Rowsell

4. Partners:

Lead Partner and Role: The EOMF will facilitate discussions and execute the plan. Participating Partner(s) and Role: Forest stakeholders will advise and review.

5. Rationale:

Development of local level indicators and State of the Forest Monitoring and Reporting has provided a framework for defining the "desired future forest condition". The establishment of sustainability thresholds or natural ranges of variation is one step in establishing community-based targets for indicators. It is only through community consultation and an iterative process of assessing various landscape condition scenarios that we can establish targets or at least a desired trend direction for indicators of a sustainable forest landscape. The EOMF is comprised of 88% private land, therefore, the vision developed for the desired future forest condition will provide a common landscape context for the collective actions of thousands of landowners, and numerous non-government organizations and government agencies.

6. Linkages:

This project has linkages to the C&I / State of the Forest Monitoring and Reporting project, the Bog-to Bog Landscape Demonstration, the Big Picture and Bigger Picture initiatives, the Algonquin to Adirondack (A2A) initiative, the Leeds Landscape Connectivity Project, the Strategic Planting Initiative, and the Forest 2020 initiative.

7. Description:

At the November 2004 ‘Advance’ the importance of continuing and strengthening efforts associated with the Future Forest Condition project was re-affirmed. Key efforts for the current fiscal year include: 1) Consulting with stakeholders to discuss the Future Forest Condition plan. 2) Identifying thresholds and various scenarios. 3) Determining gaps between current indicator status and predicted indicator status. The Forest Science Committee will be responsible for overseeing this important piece of work.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management.

- 49 -


EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1) To identify an “ideal” picture of what the forest of eastern Ontario could be within the context of a settled landscape, based on stakeholder input. 2) To develop and test scenarios that show how indicators of sustainable forestry change based on various drivers. 9. Implementation Strategy:

10. Reach:

Developing a desired future forest condition plan for eastern Ontario (Objective 2).

Primary Users / Clients: EOMF, Municipal governments, the public, landowners, Conservation Authorities, Stewardship Councils, provincial and federal governments. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Woodlot associations, government and non-government organizations with an interest in the forest landscape of eastern Ontario.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$10,000

None anticipated.

$8,000 – Time contributed by experts, stakeholders, FSC members.

Total - $10,000

Total - $0

Total - $8,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Convened several meetings with Forest Science Committee to develop the approach to the Future Forest Condition project.

Complete

• Engaged external experts with past experience in scenario planning.

- 50 -


• Identified core FSC members to develop draft Future Forest Condition Plan. • Developed the Future Forest Condition Plan. Activities for 2005-2006 Based on the plan developed in 2004-05, consult with stakeholders to discuss the Future Forest Condition plan.

March 2006

Identify thresholds and various scenarios.

March 2006

Determine gaps between current indicator status and predicted indicator status, thereby identifying potential areas of focus for EOMF efforts.

March 2006

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Future Forest Condition plan

Complete

13. Deliverables:

Deliverables for 2005-2006 Summary of consultations.

March 2006

Thresholds and scenarios report.

March 2006

Gap analysis report.

March 2006

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Involvement of stakeholders relative to a desired future forest condition for the forests of eastern Ontario. • Identification of thresholds and scenarios associated with the desired future forest condition. • Greater understanding gaps between current indicator status and predicted indicator status 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Increased direction for EOMF program through gap analysis efforts. 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • Improved status of the indicators that define the Future Forest Condition. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This project builds on the Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest reporting efforts by implementing one of the main applications of the LLI framework developed for the EOMF. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Some of the key performance indicators may include: • Timely development and execution of the plan. • Degree to which major stakeholders are engaged.

- 51 -


1. Project Name:

Bog to Bog (B2B) Landscape Demonstration

2. Project #:

2.3/02

3. Project Leader:

Mark Richardson / B2B Project Coordinator

4. Partners:

Lead: Bog to Bog Steering Committee Participating: Boisés Est, Conservation Authorities, National Capital Commission, City of Ottawa, Stewardship Coordinators, Ducks Unlimited, Wildlife Habitat Canada.

5. Rationale:

The actions and management decisions of landowners stretch beyond their own individual property boundaries. There is thus a vital need to work with landowners to instill a strong stewardship ethic so they understand the implications of their actions for the broader landscape.

6. Linkages:

This project has linkages to the Demonstration Forest Initiative, the Future Forest Condition Project, efforts associated with A2A and the Leeds Landscape Connectivity Project, as well as the Strategic Planting Initiative.

7. Description:

Mid-way through Phase II, the EOMF provided critical support to assist the initiation of a landscape-scale demonstration project in partnership with Boisés Est known as Bog to Bog (B2B). The steering committee established in Phase II will continue to focus in Phase III on delivering and refining the project – which is aimed at working with landowners to improve forest habitat by educating about the importance of forest connectivity and by helping landowners to implement management decisions which connect isolated forest ‘islands’. The Focus for 2005-06 Although Trillium funding for this project ended in February 2005, the steering committee will continue to meet regularly to discuss opportunities to continue with the project.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to

- 52 -


communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To develop new opportunities to continue with the important work of Bog to Bog. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Strengthening strategic planting and extension efforts (Objective 2).

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Woodlot owners, rural landowners Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Forest workers, community greening groups, schools and the public.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$0

None anticipated

$6,000 Time contributed by steering committee

Total - $0

Total - $0

Total - $6,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Conducted 20 landowner visits.

Complete

• Delivered 6 workshops on various stewardship topics. • Developed 3 new demonstration sites. • Coordinated Navan Fair Conservation tent. • Promoted B2B at various outreach events (e.g., Forest Fair, Navan Fair, Farm Show). • Developed proposal to Trillium (declined). Activities for 2005-2006 Meet bi-monthly with steering committee to discuss opportunities and share information.

Ongoing

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • 20 landowner visits by the project coordinator

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• 6 workshops on various stewardship topics

- 53 -


• 3 new demonstration sites • Coordination of Navan Fair Conservation Tent • Promotion of B2B at various outreach events • Trillium proposal (declined) Deliverables for 2005-2006 Bi-monthly meetings of steering committee. 14. Property Agreements:

Ongoing

To be negotiated by the project leader as required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced understandings of the importance of forest connectivity (e.g., through one-on-one consultations with landowners regarding their forest management objectives) 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced forest management plans implemented by landowners. 18. Long-Term Outcomes: • Increased forest cover and connectivity across eastern Ontario. • Enhanced environmental protection (including protection of air, soil and water resources). 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? The focus in Phase III will be to expand upon the landowner education and recruitment efforts initiated in Phase II. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. An independent evaluation process will be carried out each year to assess project progress.

- 54 -


1. Project Name:

Strategic Planting Initiative

2. Project #:

2.4/02

3. Project Leader:

Mark Richardson

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF Participating: Ontario Power Generation, Conservation Authorities, National Capital Commission, Stewardship Coordinators.

5. Rationale:

The lack of forest cover in critical areas within the EOMF is the impetus for this project. The need for strategic planting and extension efforts in these areas is paramount if we are to achieve sustainable forests in eastern Ontario.

6. Linkages:

This project is linked to the Demonstration Forest Initiative, the Bog to Bog Landscape Demonstration Initiative, as well as efforts associated with the Algonquin to Adirondack (A2A) Initiative, and the Leeds Landscape Connectivity Project.

7. Description:

Launched in Phase II in partnership with Ontario Power Generation and the other partners listed above, the Strategic Planting Initiative is aimed at planting those areas that will contribute substantially to the ecological integrity of the landscape. This represents a new and innovative approach by coordinating the various and complementary capacities of partners, in a cooperative effort, to deliver the program. The Focus in 2004-2005 Planting under the Strategic Planting Initiative has come to a close. A report documenting successes and lessons learned will be produced and shared widely. As another important function, the EOMF will assist, along with partners, in the tending of existing plantations as needed.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health.

- 55 -


5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To document and share the successes of the Strategic Planting Initiative. 2. To work toward free-to-grow status on existing plantations. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Strengthening strategic planting and extension efforts (Objective 2).

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Residents of eastern Ontario, landowners. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: All of society.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$0

None anticipated.

$6,000 Contribution of partners in follow-up tending.

Total - $0

Total - $0

Total - $6,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Planted 125,000 trees across the landscape of eastern Ontario.

Complete

Activities for 2005-2006 Tend existing plantations as needed.

June 2005

Produce summary report documenting successes/lessons learned.

September 2005

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • 125,000 trees planted and tended.

Complete

13. Deliverables:

Deliverables for 2005-2006 Tending of existing plantations as needed.

June 2005

Summary report documenting successes/lessons learned.

September 2005

14. Property Agreements:

To be negotiated by the project leader as required.

- 56 -


15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Development and implementation of a decision-support matrix to ensure the most ecologically strategic planting of trees across the eastern Ontario landscape 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Enhanced cooperation amongst partners in working together to deliver strategic planting and extension efforts in eastern Ontario. • Increased forest cover in critical areas across the landscape of eastern Ontario. • Sharing of the decision-support matrix with organizations beyond eastern Ontario (e.g., Trees Ontario). 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity • Increased forest cover and biodiversity conservation in eastern Ontario. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? The decision-support matrix developed in Phase II will be refined and adapted to ensure the most strategic planting of forest areas in eastern Ontario. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. A critical review of the project will be carried out by the EOMF board and partners. Performance indicators may include: • Number of trees planted. • Degree of collaboration on strategic planting and extension efforts. • Extent to which successes and lessons learned are shared and transferred. • Adoption/use of the decision support matrix by others.

- 57 -


1. Project Name:

Community and Former Agreement Forest Areas

2. Project #:

2.5/02

3. Project Leader:

Mark Richardson

4. Partners:

Lead Partner and Role: EOMF Participating Partner(s) and Role: Conservation Authorities, Stewardship Councils, municipalities, landowners, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, EOMF Certification Working Group.

5. Rationale:

Former agreement forest areas represent sizeable blocks of forest cover in eastern Ontario. There is an opportunity for the Eastern Ontario Model Forest to collaborate with the owners of these agreement forests – many of which are municipalities – to secure their long-term sustainability.

6. Linkages:

This project is closely linked with the activities aimed at incorporating SFM in local government plans and policies, as well as with forest resource inventory activities associated with the C&I / State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting program. It also has linkages with the Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative.

7. Description:

In 2004-2005, the EOMF continued to facilitate dialogue amongst the owners of former agreement areas to foster a sharing of experiences and to encourage the further exploration of opportunities for collaborative action to ensure forest sustainability on former agreement areas. The Bog to Bog project has also stimulated ongoing discussions with community forest owners in the eastern portion of the EOMF territory. The Focus in 2005-2006 The focus of efforts in 2005-2006 will be to maintain an active liaison with community forests by participating in the current year’s Community Forest Owners meeting, and by assisting in formulating the agenda for this meeting. The project will also explore, on an individual basis, the interest of community forests in becoming involved in initiatives such as sustainable forest certification.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape.

- 58 -


5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To explore and pursue opportunities for collaborating with the owners of community and former agreement forests in the interest of securing the longterm sustainability of these important forested areas. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Strengthening strategic planting and extension efforts (Objective 2)

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Municipalities, landowners. Co-Deliverers: Conservation Authorities, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Stewardship Councils. Other Beneficiaries: Residents of eastern Ontario, all of society.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$2,000

None anticipated.

$5,000 – Time and counsel provided by partners.

Total - $2,000

Total - $0

Total - $5,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Participated in 2 sessions with community and former agreement forest owners

Complete

Activities for 2005-2006 Maintain an active liaison with community and former agreement forest owners.

Ongoing

Continue to participate in, and provide support for, facilitated sessions as needed (e.g., assist with formulation of the agenda for the 2005 Community Forest Owners meeting; participate in the meeting).

Ongoing

Seek additional opportunities to work with partners.

Ongoing

- 59 -


13. Deliverables: Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Participation in, and support to, 2 facilitated sessions with community and former agreement forest owners.

Complete

Deliverables for 2005-2006 Participation in, and support to, ongoing facilitated sessions with community and former agreement forest owners. 14. Property Agreements:

Ongoing

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Needs and interests of community forest owners identified. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Identification of opportunities for collaborative action for ensuring the sustainability of community and former agreement forests. 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • Implementation of actions to ensure the long-term sustainability of community and former agreement forests. • Increased forest cover and biodiversity conservation across the landscape of eastern Ontario. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This is a new strategic area of examination for the Model Forest in Phase III. 20. List the performance indicators to be tracked. Performance indicators may include: • Participation of community and former agreement forest owners in facilitated discussions / sessions. • Level of enthusiasm for continuing discussions relative to potential collaborative actions.

- 60 -


1. Project Name:

Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting

2. Project #:

2.6/02

3. Project Leader:

EOMF Staff - Mark Rowsell EOMF Forest Science Committee

4. Partners:

Lead Partner(s) and Role: The EOMF, and partners, will coordinate and conduct the development and delivery of the State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting program and associated information products, with direction and support from the Forest Science Committee. Participating Partner(s) and Role: Federal and provincial government agencies, environmental organizations, non-profit organizations, Conservation Authorities, municipal governments, along with the Forest Science Committee, will provide support and information to facilitate the program and the development of the products.

5. Rationale:

The EOMF cannot evaluate changes in the forest or the landscape of eastern Ontario, or evaluate the effectiveness of its programs unless it has an effective monitoring and reporting system in place. The C&I / State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting program provides this framework.

6. Linkages:

Information developed via this project will complement the Information Kiosk (initiated in Phase II), the guidebook for local decision makers and the CommunityNatureWatch Web site (also initiated in Phase II). The C&I / State of the Forest work will also complement the transfer of knowledge beyond the EOMF boundaries. The project also has strong linkages with the certification and biodiversity conservation efforts underway in other areas of the EOMF program.

7. Description:

In Phase II, the EOMF developed a set of 18 locally-relevant indicators of sustainable forest management, which were subsequently monitored and reported on in a first State of the Forest Report (published in 1999). This work has provided a critical baseline of information for future examination of trends toward sustainable forest management in eastern Ontario. It has also provided a framework for defining the “desired future forest condition�. The focus of efforts in Phase III is to further improve and refine the state of the forest reporting process. This will be achieved by: 1) Addressing and filling knowledge gaps identified in the first State of the Forest Report 2) Reporting trends through reexamination of past indicators, and 3) Continually and effectively communicating findings from the State of the Forest Reporting & Monitoring program to landowners, organizations, the public, and all levels of government. The Focus in 2005-2006 The focus of the current year’s monitoring and reporting season will be to complete the indicators under the following criteria: 1) Soil & Water, and 2) Economic & Social Benefits. Communicating the findings associated with the indicators under these two criteria will be a further priority in the current fiscal year.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5 To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest

- 61 -


management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5 To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To report on indicators through collaboration and partnership whenever possible to ensure transparency and unbiased presentation; 2. To accommodate partner studies and data when appropriate; 3. To deliver the indicators through the State of Eastern Ontario’s Forests Web site and monthly newsletter. 9. Implementation Strategy: 10. Reach:

State of the forest monitoring and reporting (Objective 2). Primary Users / Clients: Policy makers, resource managers, monitoring agencies, environmental organizations, interest groups, landowners. Co-Deliverers: Stewardship councils, Conservation Authorities, landowner associations, environmental organizations. Other Beneficiaries: The public, international observers.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$38,000

$0

$15,000 – In-kind contribution of staff time, time volunteered by partners and Forest Science Committee members.

Total - $38,000

Total - $0

Total - $15,000

- 62 -


12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Conducted research on biological diversity and ecosystem condition & productivity criteria indicators • Designed, developed and maintained the State of Eastern Ontario’s Forests Web Site • Designed, developed and published monthly updates regarding research

Complete

Activities for 2005-2006 Conduct research on soil & water and economic & social benefits criteria indicators.

March 2006

Maintain and update the State of Eastern Ontario’s Forests Web Site.

March 2006

Publish monthly updates regarding research.

March 2006

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Results for biological diversity and ecosystem condition & productivity criteria indicators (~20 indicators)

Complete

13. Deliverables:

Updated State of Eastern Ontario’s Forests Web Site reflecting the biological diversity and ecosystem condition & productivity criteria indicators (~20 new pages)

• 12 monthly updates regarding research published and distributed Deliverables for 2005-2006 Research results for soil & water and economic & social benefits criteria indicators (~15-20 indicators).

March 2006

Updated State of Eastern Ontario’s Forests Web Site reflecting the soil & water and economic & social benefits criteria indicators (~15-20 new pages).

March 2006

12 monthly updates regarding research published and distributed.

March 2006

14. Property Agreements:

None required

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Monitoring and reporting on the state of the forest in eastern Ontario through focused indicator development on Soil & Water and Economic & Social Benefits criteria. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced communication of the results of the Soil & Water and Economic & Social Benefits criteria components of the State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting program. • Enhanced public awareness of the state of eastern Ontario’s forests.

- 63 -


• Enhanced ability to analyze and understand trends in the state of eastern Ontario’s forests based on reporting in 1999 and subsequent reporting periods. 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced ability to monitor and assess progress towards sustainable forests in eastern Ontario. • Enhanced ability to develop a long-term management strategy for ensuring the health of the forests of eastern Ontario for seven generations and beyond. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? Building on the efforts of Phase II, this project will focus on addressing gaps in the EOMF’s first State of the Forest Report (published in 1999). The suite of indicators reported on in the first State of the Forest Report will be refined, and incorporated into the Phase III State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting program. 20. List the performance indicators to be tracked. Activities and deliverables will be monitored, reviewed and evaluated by the Forest Science Committee as outlined in the FSC Strategy (January 2004). Performance indicators may include: • Meeting the goals and milestones for reporting criteria and indicators as defined in the activities and deliverables sections. • Degree to which the results of the report are communicated to the public (e.g., Web site hits and number unique visitors; number of people receiving the update newsletter).

- 64 -


1. Project Name:

Communications & Outreach

2. Project #:

3.1/02

3. Project Leader:

EOMF Staff - Elizabeth Holmes EOMF Communications Committee

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF (Communications Committee). Participating: Ferguson Forest Centre, Stewardship Councils, Ontario Woodlot Association, Domtar Inc., Eastern Ontario Biodiversity Museum, Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, Kemptville College~University of Guelph, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Canadian Institute of Forestry~Ottawa Valley Section, educational and environmental institutions, National Forest Weeks partners, others.

5. Rationale:

As in Phase II, increasing public awareness of activities within and beyond the boundaries of the EOMF is viewed as fundamental to our efforts. With a population of over 1 million in the immediate area of the EOMF, communicating the importance of forests and forest values is truly critical. Of particular importance is conveying the idea that individual actions can and do affect ecosystem and forest health at the broader scale, and that it is therefore the responsibility of all to consider the ecological footprint they leave. There is also a need to ensure awareness of sustainable forest practices that provide for economic values, while conserving the ecological integrity of our forests. If individuals understand, appreciate and respect a broad range of forest values, it will be easier to encourage the broader community to take action to sustain the forests of eastern Ontario and beyond.

6. Linkages:

This project is intimately linked with all other EOMF projects. It provides staff and financial support to inform and educate a wide range of target audiences about sustainable forest principles and practices, and the activities and programs of both the EOMF and the Canadian Model Forest Network.

7. Description:

The EOMF Communications Committee is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the Phase III (2002-2007) Communications & Outreach Plan. Key efforts for the current fiscal year include: 1) Ongoing implementation and tweaking of Communications & Outreach program activities, with a focus on ensuring a strong finish to the end of Phase III (e.g., consideration of the implications from the ‘Advance’ will be important). 2) Addressing recommendations set out in the December 2004 benchmarking exercise “Communications & Outreach in the EOFG”. 3) Documenting and effectively communicating EOMF successes and outcomes. 4) Reviewing, and adjusting as appropriate, the communications/outreachrelated performance indicators identified in the EOMF’s Phase III Evaluation & Performance Management Framework.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries.

- 65 -


5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 9. Implementation Strategy: 10. Reach:

Communications & Outreach Plan (Objective 3). Primary Users / Clients: Landowners and forest workers, First Nations, urban and rural dwellers, EOMF members, government and non-government resource management organizations, municipalities and land use planners, environmental educators, students, youth and children, educational and environmental institutions, scientists, naturalists, foundations, the agricultural community, forest industry, politicians, the policy community, media, other model forests, other strategic audiences within and beyond the EOMF. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Canadian Model Forest Network, International Model Forest Network Secretariat.

- 66 -


11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$56,000

$12,000 – Contributions by partners to support various forest-related community events including the Forest Fair of Eastern Ontario, National Forest Week, Kemptville Winter Woodlot Conference, etc.).

$102,000 – Volunteer time, expertise and services of EOMF partners, members and Communications Committee members; facilities, equipment, materials, etc.

Total - $56,000

Total - $12,000

Total - $102,000

Communications & Outreach Budget 2005-2006: Breakdown by Implementation Strategy (Projected) Implementation Strategy

EOMF Expenditures ($)

Press & Media Newsletter Display & Events (Includes Cost of a Communications Contractor) Reports & Promotional Items Brochures, Printed Materials & Advertising Education Projects Equipment & Supplies Web Hosting Web Maintenance & Updates

2,000 7,000 25,000

{*Web Site Use for Beyond the Boundaries Transfer of SFM} {*Recognition Program (& Membership)}

{10,000 }

5,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 500 5,000

{*2,000}

Support of Network Level Communications & Outreach 1,500 TOTAL 56,000 *Funds for these projects have been allotted independent from the Communications & Outreach budget in the 2005-2006 Work Plan. The Communications Committee, however, will play a lead role in overseeing these projects. 12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Helped to coordinate National Forest Week activities in the National Capital region

Complete

• Participated in the Navan Fair Conservation Tent in August • Played a key role in organizing another successful Forest Fair, which saw more than 1,000 people pass through the entrance gates • Developed new interactive materials for the Forest Fair children’s program, including a forest habitat game and a tree identification game (adaptable for use at other events) • Partnered with the Ottawa Valley Section of the CIF in developing and delivering the annual Christmas Forest Seminar

- 67 -


• Coordinated another successful Winter Woodlot Conference • Continued with regular production of Forestry Forum • Issued 14 press releases (April 2004-February 2005) • Sponsored a local high school teacher to participate in the 4th Annual Eastern Teachers Tour hosted by the Forestry Research Partnership at the Canadian Ecology Centre (the EOMF Communications Facilitator also participated, sharing EOMF and CMFN messages) • Produced a revised version of ‘Choosing the Right Tree’, with the support of a number of partners • Continued to partner with 2 local high schools through the EOMF Environmental Award • Developed the new ‘Heartwood Award’ (recognizes volunteer contributions to the EOMF) • Supported various CMFN and IMFNS efforts, including the development of a number of EOMF success stories and participation in various outreach events • Hosted various tours and field visits on behalf of the CMFN and IMFNS Activities for 2005-2006 Ongoing implementation and tweaking of Communications & Outreach program activities.

Ongoing

Develop, and provide support to, new communications and outreach activities as appropriate.

Ongoing

Address recommendations set out in the December 2004 benchmarking exercise “Communications & Outreach in the EOFG”. Document and effectively communicate EOMF successes and outcomes.

March 2006

Review, and adjust as appropriate, the communications/outreach-related performance indicators identified in the EOMF’s Phase III Evaluation & Performance Management Framework.

March 2006

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Coordination of various events (National Forest Week, Forest Fair, Winter Woodlot Conference, Christmas Forest Seminar)

Complete

March 2006

13. Deliverables:

• Interactive materials for Forest Fair • Participation in various events (e.g., Navan Fair Conservation tent) • Press releases (14 from April 2004 through February 2005) • Forestry Forum (7 issues from April 2004 through December 2005). • 4th Annual Teacher’s Tour sponsorship (and participation in the event at the Canadian Ecology Centre) • Revised edition of ‘Choosing the Right Tree’ • Presentations of EOMF Environmental Award • New ‘Heartwood Award’

- 68 -


• Support to CMFN and IMFSN communications efforts (e.g., EOMF success stories, participation in outreach events) • Field visits and tours hosted on behalf of CMFN and IMFNS Deliverables for 2005-2006 Specific deliverables will be completed as set out in the Communications & Outreach Plan (as per an updated matrix for 2005-2006).

March 2006

Incorporation of benchmarking exercise recommendations into Communications & Outreach program as appropriate.

March 2006

Documentation and communication of EOMF successes / outcomes.

March 2006

Review of communications/outreach-related performance indicators.

March 2006

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Implementation and delivery of a well-rounded Communications & Outreach program that is supportive of sustainable forest management efforts in eastern Ontario and beyond. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Increased participation of EOMF residents and others in activities, projects and events in support of sustainable forests. • Broad dissemination of information on various aspects of forests and forest sustainability. • Greater EOMF and Canadian Model Forest Network visibility. 18. Long-Term Outcomes • A population that is knowledgeable about, supportive of, and committed to sustainable forest management principles and practices. • Enhanced protection and management of forest ecosystems and associated natural areas in eastern Ontario and beyond. • An informed population engaged in activities which ensure forests for seven generations. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? As supported by the results of the end-of-Phase II survey of EOMF residents and customers, the EOMF has made considerable progress in expanding communication and outreach efforts. Notably, the survey indicates that awareness of the EOMF has increased to 24% of the residents, which represents a 100% increase during Phase II. The EOMF will continue to build upon and expand the many communications and outreach successes of Phase II via the delivery of a well-rounded Communications & Outreach Plan. As in the past, the Communications Committee will play a fundamental role in supporting and providing guidance to all communications and outreach efforts, and in overseeing the delivery of the Communications & Outreach Plan. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. The implementation of the Communications & Outreach Plan will be complemented by periodic monitoring and adjustment to ensure that efforts are moving us towards the achievement of our objectives and our overall vision. The Communications Committee will lead these efforts. An end-of-Phase III survey will also be an important source of information for evaluating the success of our public awareness and outreach efforts. Performance indicators set out in the EOMF’s Performance & Evaluation Framework will be monitored and reported on as appropriate.

- 69 -


1. Project Name:

Exchange of SFM Beyond the Boundaries

2. Project #:

4.1/02

3. Project Leader:

All EOMF Staff, Jim Cayford

4. Partners:

Lead Partner(s) and Role: EOMF Participating Partner(s) and Role: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Stewardship Councils, Federation of Ontario Naturalists, Forest Gene Conservation Association, Ontario Forestry Association, Ontario Woodlot Association chapters, Conservation Authorities, Federation of Agriculture chapters, Canadian Model Forest Network, Ontario Model Forest Network, International Model Forest Network Secretariat, Canadian Institute of Forestry (Ontario sections), University of Guelph, University of Toronto, Queen’s University, Lakehead University, State University of New York-College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Domtar, Thousand Islands-Frontenac Arch Biosphere Reserve, A2A Conservation Association (Rideau-St. Lawrence Chapter), others.

5. Rationale:

The Eastern Ontario Model Forest has established an excellent approach to working beyond its boundaries. Efforts to further increase the strategic transfer of SFM beyond the EOMF boundaries are viewed as paramount in Phase III. There is an opportunity to collaborate with other model forests in ensuring the transfer of SFM principles and practices across Canada. *Note: Schedule D of the Contribution Agreement (2002-2007) with CFS also references the importance of ensuring the exchange of knowledge and experience beyond the boundaries of the EOMF and, in particular, across the Canadian Model Forest Network in Phase III.

6. Linkages:

This project is intimately linked with all EOMF projects and activities.

7. Description:

The strategic transfer of SFM beyond the boundaries of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest will be achieved through multiple avenues which include: • Expanding outreach networks and tools beyond our boundaries • Engaging communities beyond our boundaries • Expanding initiatives with First Nations communities beyond our boundaries Specific transfer activities, and associated deliverables, are outlined in Sections 12 and 13 respectively. The focus of this transfer will be on the settled landscape of southern Ontario. This, however, will not exclude other geographic areas that may be appropriate for specific transfer opportunities. In particular, opportunities for collaborating with other model forests on specific topics of common interest (e.g., forest certification, local level indicators) will be pursued. As part of the continuing approach to working beyond our boundaries, the expertise of a special advisor who resides in the greater Toronto area will be used to provide regular representation in meetings and events linked to our efforts (e.g., meetings of The Ontario Rural Council, OMNR science forums). The EOMF will play a strong role in supporting regional, national and international efforts at furthering sustainable forestry. Examples include: • Working alongside the Lake Abitibi Model Forest as an “Ontario Model Forest Network” on broad policy-level initiatives (e.g., Canada-Ontario MOU on Forestry) and various outreach efforts.

- 70 -


• Providing input to, and supporting, the strategic initiatives of the Canadian Model Forest Network – in particular, the EOMF will continue to play a strong role in helping to guide and support the Private Woodlots Strategic Initiative. • Supporting network-level communications and outreach efforts (e.g., representation at events, development of communications materials). • Participating on the various network-level steering committees (e.g., Private Woodlots Steering Committee, Web Site Steering Committee). • Providing input to the National Forest Strategy and supporting its implementation province-wide. • Participating in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy as a member of the Canadian Urban Forest Network. • Hosting tours with international delegations in partnership with the International Model Forest Network Secretariat (IMFNS). • Supporting communications and outreach efforts of the IMFNS. 8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management beyond the boundaries of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest.

9. Implementation Strategy:

Expanding outreach networks and tools; Engaging communities beyond our boundaries; Expanding initiatives with First Nations communities beyond the area of the Model Forest (Objective 4).

- 71 -


10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: Various audiences beyond the boundaries of the EOMF including landowners, the public, government and non-government resource management agencies and conservation groups, other model forests, First Nations, researchers, educational institutions. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Canadian Model Forest Network, International Model Forest Network Secretariat.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$8,000

None anticipated.

$10,000 – Contributions of time and expertise by staff, partners, members, EOMF board and committee members. Travel costs covered by hosts inviting participation at various events.

Total - $8,000

Total - $0

Total - $10,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Represented by our beyond-the-boundaries liaison at the Ontario Rural Council (TORC) forum, and at an initial meeting of the recently-established Environmental Working Group • Convened “Forest Convergence in the Thousand Islands” session, bringing together conservation interests from both sides of the Canada/U.S. border to discuss opportunities for collaboration • Created “Forest Convergence” Web site: http://convergence.eomf.on.ca • Participated in the annual meeting of the Forest Gene Conservation Association • Created a poster-map showing EOMF “beyond the boundaries” activities • Developed a series of abstracts (EOMF success stories) for inclusion in the IMFNS 10-year anniversary publication • Hosted visitors from Indonesia and India on behalf of the International Model Forest Network Secretariat • Participated in a summer study tour with a Chinese “Nature/Biosphere Reserves” delegation • Hosted university researcher from Sweden • Hosted four students from ENGREF, Nancy, France for three weeks in August while they were in Canada conducting a model forest feasibility study; involved them in the development of case studies for our State of the Forest Monitoring and Reporting program • Participated in, and delivered presentations on certification and Naturalized Knowledge Systems respectively, at the joint CIF-SAF conference in Edmonton • Hosted an intern from Japan for 10 months • Worked alongside the Lake Abitibi Model Forest as the ‘Ontario Model Forest Network’ • Continued to be an active participant in the many strategic initiatives of the

- 72 -

Complete


Canadian Model Forest Network (e.g., Private Woodlots Strategic Initiative, Climate Change Strategic Initiative). • Hosted a tour involving the Executive Committee of the International Energy Agency [IEA] - Bioenergy Agreement. Activities for 2005-2006 I. Expanding Outreach Networks and Tools Formalizing knowledge and exchange networks with strategic partners beyond the EOMF boundaries – examples: - Strengthen and broaden collaboration with OMNR Stewardship Councils in southern Ontario to support and transfer EOMF activities including landowner workshops and demonstration forests - Formalize network ambassadors to represent EOMF at strategic venues beyond our boundaries (e.g., representation at forest science events by Jim Cayford such as the OFA AGM) - Maintain presence at strategic events including the OMNR Southcentral Region Forestry Forum and The Ontario Rural Council (TORC) forums - Continue as a member of The Ontario Rural Council - Identify opportunities to work more closely with strategic groups including FON, FGCA, OFA, OWA, Conservation Authorities, Federation of Agriculture, Federation of Anglers and Hunters, Trees Ontario Foundation (EOMF is represented on the Trees Ontario steering committee) - Continue to foster the relationships and strengthen the efforts stemming from the September 2004 “Forest Convergence” session (New York State/Ontario collaborative initiative) Transferring knowledge on themes of common interest across the Canadian Model Forest Network – examples: - Share certification experiences gained in eastern Ontario with Fundy Model Forest, Nova Forest Alliance, and Bas St. Laurent Model Forest - Share experiences relative to local level indicators and State of the Forest reporting with other model forests across the Network through workshops, etc. - Work with Lake Abitibi Model Forest as an “Ontario Model Forest Network” on broad policy level initiatives (e.g., Canada-Ontario MOU on Forestry) - Provide input to the model forest network Partnership Synergy Project - Support activities of the Private Woodlot Strategic Initiative of the CMFN, and participate on the Private Woodlots Steering Committee - Support network-level communications and outreach efforts (e.g., representation at events, development of communications materials) - Participate on the CMFN Web Site Steering Committee Transferring the model forest concept to international and other interested groups – examples: - Host tours with international delegations visiting the Ottawa / Kemptville area in partnership with the International Model Forest Network Secretariat - Support communications and outreach efforts of the IMFNS (e.g., contributions to 10th anniversary publication) - Work alongside Lake Abitibi Model Forest as the “Ontario Model Forest Network” on various outreach efforts (e.g., annual speaking engagements at Lakehead University, University of Toronto, etc.) Supporting regional, national and international efforts at furthering sustainable forestry – examples: - Provide update on activities to Canada-Ontario Memorandum of Understanding on Forestry

- 73 -

Ongoing 2005-2006


-

Provide input to the National Forest Strategy and support its implementation province-wide Participate in the development of the Canadian Urban Forest Strategy (as a member of the Canadian Urban Forest Network)

Expanding knowledge transfer tools – example: - Expand the EOMF Web site as an important beyond-the-boundaries transfer tool (*addressed under Project 4.2/02) II. Engaging Communities Beyond Our Boundaries Establishing nodes for forest certification beyond eastern Ontario (See Project 1.7/02)

Ongoing 2005-2006

Liaising with landscape level initiatives underway in Ontario – examples: - Facilitate the establishment of A2A Conservation Association with its links beyond the EOMF - Work with the Thousand Islands-Frontenac Arch Biosphere Reserve to develop linkages to similar efforts in the Great Lakes basin - Participate in Carolinian Canada’s “Big Picture” initiative and the Nature Conservancy’s “Bigger Picture” initiative - Work with the FON on the development of the Southern Ontario Woodlands Conservation Strategy and refinement of Significant Woodlands Criteria III. Expanding SFM Initiatives with First Nations Communities Beyond Our Boundaries - Refine opportunities for collaborative work on themes of common interest - Engage First Nations beyond the boundaries in model forest projects and activities ,sharing knowledge and experience

Ongoing 2005-2006

13. Deliverables Deliverables (Outputs) Progress in 2004-2005 • Representation at the Ontario Rural Council (TORC) forum, and at a meeting of the recently-established Environmental Working Group • “Forest Convergence in the Thousand Islands” session • “Forest Convergence” Web site: http://convergence.eomf.on.ca • Participation in the annual meeting of the Forest Gene Conservation Association • Poster-map showing EOMF “beyond the boundaries” activities • Series of abstracts (EOMF success stories) for inclusion in the IMFNS 10-year anniversary publication • Study tours / visits hosted with individuals from Indonesia, China, Sweden, France, etc. • Tour involving the Executive Committee of the International Energy Agency [IEA] - Bioenergy Agreement • Internship with individual from Japan • Participation in, and delivery of presentations at, the joint CIF-SAF conference in Edmonton • Outreach efforts as the ‘Ontario Model Forest Network’ • Contributions to the many strategic initiatives of the Canadian Model Forest Network (e.g., Private Woodlots Strategic Initiative, Climate Change Strategic Initiative).

- 74 -

Completion Date Complete


I. Expanding Outreach Networks and Tools ⇒ Transfer of model forest activities (e.g., landowner workshops, demonstration forest activities) ⇒ New partnerships and outreach networks ⇒ Network of ambassadors to transfer EOMF messages ⇒ Presence at OMNR Southcentral Region Forestry Forum, TORC and other strategic events and forums ⇒ Transfer of certification and local level indicator experiences with other model forests ⇒ Input to the model forest network Partnership Synergy Project ⇒ Communications materials for the CMFN and IMFNS (e.g., success stories, project updates, etc.) ⇒ Tours with international and other interested groups interested in the model forest concept ⇒ Speaking engagements/presentations to universities and others as the “Ontario Model Forest Network” ⇒ Strengthened and expanded partnerships with resource/conservation management interests on both sides of the Canada/U.S. border ⇒ Update activities to Canada-Ontario MOU on Forestry ⇒ Input to the implementation of the National Forest Strategy province-wide (including input to development of Canadian Urban Forest Strategy) ⇒ Enhanced / expanded / well-promoted EOMF Web site, as well as supportive Web sites (e.g., Ferguson Forest Centre, FGCA, etc.)

Ongoing 2005-2006

II. Engaging Communities Beyond Our Boundaries ⇒ New nodes for certification beyond eastern Ontario ⇒ Support to A2A Conservation Association in Ontario ⇒ Participation in bio-regional planning initiatives (Big and Bigger Picture initiatives) ⇒ Input to Southern Ontario Woodlands Conservation Strategy and development of Significant Woodlands Criteria

Ongoing 2005-2006

III. Expanding SFM Initiatives with First Nations Communities Beyond Our Boundaries ⇒ Follow-up and outcomes of discussions

Ongoing 2005-2006

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: (outcomes within 18 months of project commencement) • Increased sharing of EOMF knowledge, tools and resources within and beyond eastern Ontario via expansion of outreach networks. • Strengthening, broadening and enhancement of opportunities for collaborative work towards sustainable forests within and beyond eastern Ontario. • Enhanced presence at strategic venues beyond the EOMF. • Enhanced transfer of the model forest concept to international and other interested groups.

- 75 -


17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: (outcomes within 5 years of project commencement) • Increased application of knowledge shared by the EOMF within and beyond eastern Ontario. • Increased collaborative work with partners beyond the EOMF. 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: (outcomes within 10 years of project commencement) • Enhanced forest sustainability across the landscape of southern Ontario through cooperative and collaborative planning and implementation of programs and activities. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This work will strengthen and expand the many outreach networks established throughout Phases I and II of the program. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Some of the performance indicators that may be used in assessing the project include: • Number, diversity and depth of new partnerships initiated beyond the EOMF. • Range and degree of involvement of communities and organizations beyond the EOMF. • Number and type of events attended beyond the EOMF. • Reach to audiences beyond our boundaries (might be measured, for example, as part of an end-ofPhase III survey). • Evidence of knowledge shared by the EOMF being applied elsewhere. • Partner assessments of the value of working with the EOMF.

- 76 -


1. Project Name:

Web Site Use for Beyond the Boundaries Transfer of SFM

2. Project #:

4.2/02

3. Project Leader:

Greg Moffatt

4. Partners:

Lead Partner(s) and Role: EOMF will coordinate the development and delivery of the products. Participating Partner(s) and Role: Provincial government ministries, Conservation Authorities, municipal governments, forest consultants, and the public. These partners will provide support and information to facilitate the development of the products.

5. Rationale:

The EOMF has gathered a wealth of knowledge and information throughout the last two Phases of the program and it is important to the EOMF that this information be shared with the public both within and outside the EOMF boundaries. To help share this information, the EOMF will increase the services and information made available through its Web site.

6. Linkages:

Some of the information developed through this project will complement the following projects: Information Kiosk, C&I / State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting program, CommunityNatureWatch, Forest Certification, Bog-to-Bog, Landowner Workshop Series, Demonstration Forest Initiative, Web-Enabled Forest Management Tool, Guidebook for Decision Makers, and Communications & Outreach.

7. Description:

This project is designed to increase the services and information made available through the EOMF Web site which will help to promote sustainable forest management and related topics. It entails creating, updating, and maintaining various Web sites and tools. The Focus in 2005-2006 Current deliverables for this project include the addition of an online survey system to the EOMF Web site, making use of cutting-edge Web development tools and techniques. With this enhancement, the EOMF can conduct online polls and surveys to gauge public understanding of SFM concepts, the effectiveness of EOMF program delivery, demand for workshops on various topics, and more.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario.

- 77 -


To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: The online survey system will be used for a wide range of purposes, including tailoring the delivery of the EOMF program to better serve all stakeholders, contributing public survey data to the Criteria & Indicators / State of the Forest Monitoring & Reporting program, setting topics for workshops and information sessions, and more. Surveys will be quick and easy for site visitors to complete. 9. Implementation Strategy: 10. Reach:

Exchanging SFM through expanded outreach networks and tools (Objective 4). Primary Users / Clients: All model forest partners and stakeholders, including federal, provincial, and municipal government, Conservation Authorities, industry, First Nations, forest consultants, educators, environmentalists, landowners, and the public. Co-Deliverers: The EOMF will design and develop the survey system, with guidance from the Communications Committee. All model forest staff, the board of directors, and committees will participate in the development of surveys. Other Beneficiaries: Information collected through the survey system can be shared with stewardship councils, Conservation Authorities, other local interest groups, etc.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$10,000

$0

$2000 – EOMF committees (input and direction).

Total - $10,000

Total - $0

Total - $2,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Developed and published the new EOMF Web site

Complete

Activities for 2005-2006 Scope out the functional requirements for an online survey system.

- 78 -

August 2005


Design and compose several surveys.

August 2005

Design, develop, and implement an online survey system on the EOMF Web site.

September 2005

Seek additional funds to support Web services.

Ongoing

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • New EOMF Web site

Complete

13. Deliverables:

Deliverables for 2005-2006 Online survey system.

September 2005

Three initial surveys.

September 2005

14. Property Agreements:

None required

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Feedback from Web site users on a variety of topics. • A more interactive Web site. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Better targeted workshops, projects, publications, and overall program delivery. • Improved public participation in events and workshops, and greater public awareness of the activities of the EOMF and its partners. • Enhanced model forest partnerships through cross-promotion and other linkages. 18. Long-Term Outcomes of Project Activity: • A more knowledgeable community in eastern Ontario and beyond with respect to sustainable forest management. • Enhanced uptake of, and participation in, sustainable forest management. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? Data, techniques and information gathered or created through the EOMF Mapping and Information Group in Phase II will be incorporated into the Web site. Partnerships built in Phase I and II will be strengthened through this collaboration. 20. List the performance indicators to be tracked. The number of survey respondents will be tracked for each survey.

- 79 -


1. Project Name:

Equity Generation

2. Project #:

5.1/02

3. Project Leader:

Sandra Lawn

4. Partners:

Lead: Equity Generation Committee. Participating: Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, EOMF members, partners, consultants and affiliated groups, EOMF staff and Communications Committee.

5. Rationale:

In this project “equity generation” is defined as building financial, political and social value. The generation of equity is essential if the EOMF is to continue to respond to foreseen, as well as unforeseen, opportunities and influence the building of “forests for seven generations”.

6. Linkages:

This project must be linked to other EOMF projects and existing partners. It must be ready to respond, when needed, to unforeseen opportunities. It will also serve as a linkage to new partners in academia, government agencies, local governments, business or not-for-profit organizations that have not been involved with the EOMF before.

7. Description:

This project supports activities of the EOMF’s Equity Committee (see Activities and Deliverables below).

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management. EOMF Objectives: To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation.

- 80 -


Project Objectives: 1. To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts of the EOMF through equity generation. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Equity generation (Objective 5).

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: EOMF, partners. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Residents of eastern Ontario, Canadian Model Forest Network, all of society.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$10,000

Goal is to raise $90,000 to support various projects and activities.

$10,000 – Time contributed by EOMF members and ambassadors, EOMF partners (e.g., governments at various levels), project leader.

Total - $10,000

Total - $90,000

Total - $10,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Ongoing partnership building

Complete

• Completed initial priority-setting exercise looking at equity needs for the balance of Phase III and beyond • Took a lead role in helping to coordinate the EOMF ‘Advance’ • Assisted in coordinating the “Forest Convergence in the Thousand Islands” session • Facilitated EOMF-hosted session looking at ‘Strategic Directions for the Canadian Model Forest Network’ and produced associated proceedings • Ongoing participation in various outreach events (e.g., DIAMONDS land trust session, Nature Conservancy of Canada field day) • Hosted a tour involving the Executive Committee of the International Energy Agency [IEA] - Bioenergy Agreement • Assumed lead role in the development of the value-added wood centre concept Activities for 2005-2006 Strengthen new and existing partnerships through conference participation, consultations, seminars and presentations as required.

Ongoing

Assist with preparation of applications and proposals to funding institutions, based on identified equity needs (e.g., mapping and information services, other needs).

March 2006

Through various funding sources, locate funding to replace shortfall in

Ongoing

- 81 -


certification and related initiatives. Broaden base of support by examining current partnerships, analyzing gaps and broadening the EOMF association with the New York State “forest convergence”, OMNR Forest Strategy and other groups.

Ongoing

Generate financial capacity and develop further partners to assist in creating a higher profile for existing and newly-developed publications and tools.

Ongoing

Develop and implement transition strategies through: name, branding, membership and greater integration with other sectors (e.g., Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Environment Canada).

Ongoing

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • New, strengthened partnerships

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• Priority-setting exercise • Coordination of EOMF ‘Advance’ • Coordination of Forest Convergence session • Facilitation of ‘Strategic Directions for the Canadian Model Forest Network’ session • Proceedings of the above-noted session • Participation in various outreach events (e.g., workshops, conferences, field days, tours) Deliverables for 2005-2006 Strengthening of new and existing partnerships through conference participation, consultations, seminars and presentations as required.

Ongoing

Applications and proposals to funding institutions.

March 2006

Broadening of base of support (including gap analysis).

Ongoing

Financial capacity to assist in creating a higher profile for existing and newly-developed publications and tools.

Ongoing

Development and implementation of transition strategies.

Ongoing

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: (outcomes within 1.5 years of project initiation) • Enhanced partnerships with environmental resource management organizations and interest groups. • Funding proposals to further sustainable forest management efforts. • Agreements in principle for a timetable to complete a forest inventory layer for southern Ontario. • Increased interaction with municipal governments through various outreach efforts. • Enhanced Web-based mapping available for landowners. • A closer alliance with government departments at various levels (e.g., agriculture, environment).

- 82 -


17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity (outcomes within 5 years of project initiation) • FRI for all of southern Ontario completed. • Atlas and Resource Book completed. 18. Long-Term Outcomes (outcomes within 10 years of project initiation) • Increased forest cover and biodiversity conservation in eastern Ontario. • More knowledgeable landowners and municipal leaders committed to sustainable forest management practices and principles. • Official Plans that adequately protect ground water and surface water, soils, biodiversity, and health benefits of a healthy landscape. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This project will build on EOMF efforts in Phases I and II by continuing to expand the financial, political and social values inherent in “forests for seven generations.” 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Performance indicators may include: • Number, diversity, scope and impact of partnerships. • Number and diversity of partnership / collaborative projects. • Number of collaborative agreements. • Number, range and impact of knowledge networks. • Level of funding secured to undertake projects (non-CFS). • Degree of collaboration on sustainable forest projects.

- 83 -


1. Project Name:

Akwesasne Partnership

2. Project #:

5.2/02

3. Project Leader:

Henry Lickers / Richard David

4. Partners:

Lead: Mohawk Council of Akwesasne~Department of the Environment Participating: Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, Akwesasne Task Force on the Environment, St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences, State University of New York~College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Cornell University, University of Ottawa, Ferguson Forest Centre, Forest Gene Conservation Association, others.

5. Rationale:

The EOMF has learned much from the community at Akwesasne in Phases I and II of the model forest program. Working with the community has garnered new ways of looking at forests and of valuing them, and, in particular, has highlighted the importance of forests from a spiritual and cultural perspective. In addition to having shared new understandings of forest ecosystems and their values, the community has impressed upon the EOMF the importance of working relationships based on the principles of respect, equity and empowerment. This concept has been adopted wholeheartedly by the EOMF and has proven instrumental in establishing credibility among partners.

6. Linkages:

This project is closely linked with communications and outreach efforts, along with forest science and equity efforts of the EOMF.

7. Description:

In Phase III, the EOMF will continue to work in close partnership with the community at Akwesasne, building on the many successes of Phases I and II of the program. Although grouped under Objective 5, the activities of this partnership span across all other EOMF objectives as well. The Focus in 2005-2006 Key efforts under the Akwesasne Partnership for 2005-2006 include: ongoing participation on EOMF committees and working groups (with special interest in analysis and evaluation efforts); ongoing participation in beyond-the-boundaries outreach efforts of the EOMF and CMFN; participation in province-wide butter preservation efforts; the development of a PowerPoint presentation on the historical and cultural significance of butternut to the Haudenosaunee; the development of a seed bank for all species of ash; ongoing work to enhance and expand the existing network of black ash plots; ongoing work to restore native fruit trees at Akwesasne; the delivery of forestry-related programs to local schools; the cataloguing of culturally-significant species on Sheik Island.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management.

- 84 -


EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To enhance appreciation for, and understandings of, the cultural and spiritual values of the forest important to the Haudenosaunee people. 2. To foster a greater respect for multiple forest values amongst forestry professionals, scientists, landowners and the public. 3. To foster greater collaboration amongst native and non-native communities in protecting cultural and spiritual values important to the Haudenosaunee. 9. Implementation Strategy: 10. Reach:

Providing support for the Akwesasne Partnership (Objective 5). Primary Users / Clients: Educational and environmental institutions, youth, elders, scientists, government and non-government resource management agencies and health agencies, landowners, forest workers, the public, others. Co-Deliverers: Partners, as listed in Section 4. Other Beneficiaries: Canadian Model Forest Network, International Model Forest Network Secretariat.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$44,000

$55,000 – Contribution from MCA, other partners.

$88,000 – Time, counsel, other contributions of MCA Department of the Environment

Total - $44,000

Total - $55,000

Total - $88,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Participated on EOMF board, and various committees.

Complete

• Continued with ongoing black ash preservation efforts. • Produced a revised edition of the black ash manual.

- 85 -


• Conducted tree assessments on Stanley and Hamilton islands. • Participated in EOMF Annual Spring Gathering. • Convened a meeting concerning the Forest 20/20 initiative and how it might be implemented at Akwesasne. • Delivered a presentation on medicinal plants as part of the NonTimber Forest Products workshop co-sponsored by the Eastern Ontario Certified Forest Owners. • Delivered a presentation on Naturalized Knowledge Systems at the joint CIF-SAF conference in Edmonton. • Conducted butternut cloning trials (ongoing). • Initiated work looking at seed growing zones and climate change implications. • Initiated work looking at community health indicators relative to the forest and forest-based activities. • Held annual tree and seed give-away. • Held maple syrup education days and tree identification walks involving local schools. Activities for 2005-2006 Participate on various EOMF committees and working groups, with special interest in analysis and evaluation efforts.

Ongoing

Participate in beyond-the-boundaries extension of SFM through participation in EOMF, Canadian Model Forest Network and other activities.

Ongoing

Partner in the delivery of a First Nations awareness training session relative to EOMF forest certification efforts.

April 2005

Participate in ongoing province-wide butternut preservation efforts.

Ongoing

Develop a PowerPoint presentation on the historical and cultural significance of butternut to the Haudenosaunee.

April 2005

Continue work to enhance existing black ash plots and develop new ones within and beyond the EOMF.

Ongoing

Develop a seed bank of all ash species (spawned by concerns around the emerald ash borer, and the implications should it make its way to eastern Ontario).

Ongoing

Promote and distribute updated black ash manual.

Ongoing

Develop a PowerPoint presentation on black ash regeneration efforts and basket making.

May 2005

Continue work to restore native fruit trees at Akwesasne.

Ongoing

Organize and deliver forest-related programs to local schools (e.g., tree identification walks focusing on culturally significant species, maple syrup education, etc.).

Ongoing

Conduct yearly tree assessments at Akwesasne, with assistance from the EOMF Project Forester.

March 2006

Conduct GIS project to plot plantations (black ash, black walnut) on Sheik Island; catalogue 100m plots, looking at culturally-significant species. Explore community health indicators as related to the forest, including workshop possibility in conjunction with EOMF Forest Science Committee.

March 2006

- 86 -

March 2006


13. Deliverables: Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Participation on EOMF board, and various committees.

Complete

• Ongoing black ash preservation efforts. • Revised edition of black ash manual. • Tree assessments at Akwesasne. • Participation at EOMF Annual Spring Gathering • Presentation on medicinal plants as part of Non-Timber Products workshop. • Presentation on Naturalized Knowledge Systems (delivered at the joint CIF-SAF conference in Edmonton). • Butternut cloning trials. • Annual tree and seed give-away. • Maple syrup education days and tree identification walks with local school children. Deliverables for 2005-2006 Input to committee meetings (guidance provided to the EOMF on a regular basis represents an invaluable part of the partnership).

Ongoing

Participation in beyond-the-boundaries extension of SFM through participation in EOMF and Canadian Model Forest Network activities (e.g., hosting tours and medicine walks, participation in conferences and workshops).

Ongoing

Participation in the delivery of a First Nations awareness training session relative to forest certification.

April 2005

Participation in ongoing province-wide butternut preservation efforts.

Ongoing

PowerPoint presentation on the historical and cultural significance of butternut to the Haudenosaunee.

April 2005

Enhanced and expanded network of black ash plots within and beyond the EOMF – contributing to basket making, scientific research and education efforts.

Ongoing

Seed bank of all ash species.

Ongoing

PowerPoint presentation on black ash regeneration efforts and basket making.

May 2005

Enhanced native fruit orchard at Akwesasne for educational purposes.

Ongoing

Delivery of forestry-related programs to local schools.

Ongoing

Yearly tree assessments.

March 2006

Plotting and cataloguing of culturally-significant species on Sheik Island.

March 2006

Possible workshop on community health indicators as related to forests.

TBD (requires more scoping)

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening.

- 87 -


16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Greater public appreciation for the cultural and spiritual values of the forest important to the Haudenosaunee people. • Greater respect for multiple forest values amongst forestry professionals, scientists, landowners and the public. • Greater collaboration amongst native and non-native communities in protecting cultural and spiritual values important to the Haudenosaunee. • A great sense of pride within the community at Akwesasne at being able to share with others the importance of the forest from a unique cultural and spiritual perspective. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity • Enhanced environmental protection through black ash and other reforestation efforts. • Enhanced forest science through black ash and associated research efforts. • Enhanced understandings of naturalized knowledge systems. 18. Long-Term Outcomes • Protection of the cultural and spiritual values of the forest important to the Haudenosaunee people. • Enhanced environmental protection, including air, and water quality enhancements through reforestation efforts. • A heightened sense of respect for ‘Mother Earth’ among native and non-native communities. • The greening of eastern Ontario and beyond. • Forests for seven generations. 19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? This project will continue to strengthen and build upon the many partnerships and associated partnership activities in Phases I and II of the program, resulting in many more positive contributions to sustainable forestry on the ground. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. Performance indicators may include: • Number of outreach events attended and beyond-the-boundaries exchanges. • Number and impact of partnership projects and activities. • Degree to which the forests for seven generations philosophy is adopted and implemented within and beyond the EOMF (e.g., using case studies as an approach to investigating this).

- 88 -


1. Project Name:

Analysis & Evaluation

2. Project #:

5.3/02

3. Project Leader:

n/a

4. Partners:

Lead: EOMF will coordinate analysis and evaluation efforts. Participating Partner(s) and Role: All EOMF committees, board and staff, EOMF partners and members, landowners, residents of eastern Ontario, EOMF customers, and the public will contribute to (and benefit from) analysis and evaluation efforts.

5. Rationale:

In order to assess the effectiveness of our activities, projects and programs, analysis and evaluation efforts are paramount. Such efforts are not only vital in assessing whether or not we are effectively fulfilling our objectives and our overall vision, but are also viewed as critical in helping to re-affirm our priorities and direction for Phase III and beyond.

6. Linkages:

This project is intimately linked with all EOMF activities and projects.

7. Description:

This project will support efforts to critically review and evaluate EOMF activities and programs throughout Phase III (2002-2007). Such efforts will include the ongoing application of the Evaluation & Performance Management Framework developed by the EOMF in Year One of Phase III, and a mid-Phase evaluation of EOMF activities and programs (which will assume the form of a board / partner ‘Advance’). A further opportunity for analysis and evaluation of our efforts will be via an anticipated end-of-Phase III survey similar to that conducted at the end of Phase II by the EOMF. The Focus in 2005-2006 Efforts in the current year will focus on incorporating the results of the Phase III ‘Advance’ (held November 18-19, 2004) into EOMF activities and programs to ensure a strong finish to the end of Phase III. Feedback from the Advance will also serve to guide future directions for the EOMF in the longer-term (i.e., beyond March 2007). The ongoing refinement and application of the Evaluation & Performance Management Framework will also be a priority. Documenting and effectively communicating the EOMF’s many successes will be a critically important exercise in the current fiscal year.

8. Objectives:

Please place a 5 beside those that are MOST relevant in the context of this project. CFS Objectives: 5To encourage the development and adoption of innovative sustainable forest management systems and tools within and beyond the model forest boundaries. 5To ensure that the results and knowledge gained through Canada’s Model Forest Program are disseminated broadly at local, regional, and national levels. 5To strengthen Model Forest Network activities. 5To increase opportunities for local level participation in sustainable forest management.

- 89 -


EOMF Objectives: 5To increase the quality and health of existing forest ecosystems in eastern Ontario. 5To increase forest cover in areas that contribute to improving forest sustainability and biodiversity across the eastern Ontario landscape. 5To expand the informed segment of the population that is supportive of sustainable forest management and knowledgeable about the value of forests to communities and human health. 5To increase the strategic transfer of sustainable forest management principles and practices beyond the area of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest. 5To strengthen sustainable forest management efforts through equity generation, partnership building and program analysis and evaluation. Project Objectives: 1. To critically review and evaluate EOMF activities and programs throughout Phase III (2002-2007). 2. To make adjustments to activities and programs as appropriate based on analysis and evaluation efforts. 9. Implementation Strategy:

Analysis and evaluation (Objective 5).

10. Reach:

Primary Users / Clients: EOMF partners and members, landowners, residents of eastern Ontario, EOMF customers, the public. Co-Deliverers: EOMF partners. Other Beneficiaries: Canadian Model Forest Network, International Model Forest Network, various resource management agencies and organizations.

11. Budget: EOMF $

Direct Contributions – Other $

Direct Contributions – In-Kind

$1,000

None anticipated.

$2,000 – Volunteer time of board and committee members; partners.

Total - $1,000

Total - $0

Total - $2,000

12. Activities: Activities (Methodology)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • Held EOMF ‘Advance’ at the Queen’s University Biological Station, November 18-19, 2004.

Complete

• Produced ‘Advance’ proceedings. • Conducted post-Advance analysis of findings involving staff and board members.

- 90 -


• Continued with ongoing application of Evaluation & Performance Management Framework to EOMF activities Activities for 2005-2006 Incorporate the results of the Phase III ‘Advance’ (held November 1819, 2004) into EOMF activities and programs.

Ongoing

Document and effectively communicate the EOMF’s many successes (intimately linked with Communications & Outreach program).

March 2006

Continue to refine and apply the Evaluation & Performance Management Framework to EOMF activities and programs.

Ongoing

Initiate scoping exercise for end-of-Phase III survey.

March 2006

Deliverables (Outputs)

Completion Date

Progress in 2004-2005 • EOMF ‘Advance’.

Complete

13. Deliverables:

• ‘Advance’ proceedings. • Implementation of the Evaluation & Performance Management Framework. Deliverables for 2005-2006 Adjustments to EOMF activities and programs, as appropriate, based on the feedback from the ‘Advance’.

Ongoing

EOMF “success stories” (documented and effectively communicated).

March 2006

Refinements, as appropriate, to Evaluation & Performance Management Framework.

Ongoing

Scoping exercise for end-of-Phase III survey.

March 2006

14. Property Agreements:

None required.

15. Environmental Assessment: Based on an examination of the project activities against the inclusion and exclusion regulations of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, there is no requirement for an environmental screening. 16. Immediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced implementation of Evaluation & Performance Management Framework that will help us to monitor progress and assess performance relative to EOMF and Canadian Model Forest Program objectives. 17. Intermediate Outcomes of Project Activity: • Enhanced reporting on progress and performance relative to EOMF and Canadian Model Forest Program objectives. • Further refinement of activities and programs based on results of EOMF ‘Advance’ and end-of-Phase III survey. 18. Long-Term Outcomes: • Enhanced forest activities and programs that meet the needs of users and that advance sustainable forest management in eastern Ontario and beyond.

- 91 -


19. How will this project build on EOMF efforts in Phase I (1992-1997) and Phase II (1997-2002)? In Phase II, a considerable effort was directed at critically reviewing and evaluating EOMF programs and activities. This included the assessment of accomplishments relative to objectives, the assessment of direct impacts and ultimate outcomes of activities, the identification of gaps and weaknesses, and the identification of opportunities for furthering sustainable forest management activities. Similar efforts will be vital in Phase III, and partners will again be looked to as an important source of objective feedback on EOMF performance. Building on the analysis and evaluation traditions and successes of Phase II, a board/partner ‘Advance’ will be held mid-Phase (2004-2005) to review the past, examine the present and consider the future. An end-ofPhase III survey, much like that conducted at the end of Phase II, will also be coordinated by the EOMF to help assess performance relative to Phase III objectives. 20. Outline the performance management strategy for the project. The EOMF Board of Directors will oversee all review and evaluation efforts. Performance indicators may include: • Timely implementation of a mid-Phase evaluation of activities and programs (i.e., in the form of a board / partner ‘Advance’). • Timely and efficient adjustment, as required, following the mid-Phase evaluation of activities and programs. • Timely implementation of an end-of-Phase III survey of EOMF residents and customers. • Degree of participation in analysis and evaluation efforts by committees, partners and others.

- 92 -


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.