Retrofit Kit

Retrofit Kit: Design tools for making our homes accessible

EXHIBITION REVIEW

This Melbourne exhibition explored how our existing housing stock can be altered, changed and refitted to better meet the diverse housing needs of the Australian population.

Words by Louise Wright Photography by Peter Bennetts

01

In March, two years of ongoing research around retrofitting existing housing stock to better suit more diverse needs was presented in the exhibition RetroFit Kit: Design Tools for Making our Homes Accessible. At a 1:1 scale, a showroomlike installation demonstrated how Melbourne’s housing could be modified and the implications for the millions of Australians whose living needs are not currently being met. Housing disadvantage comes in many forms and its solutions are often complex, with dwelling design rarely considered. But this exhibition and the body of research behind it elevate the power of design, deep architectural knowledge and small changes. Retrofitting is a critical strategy for architecture in addressing the mismatch between the diversity of our society and the relative homogeneity of our housing stock. Led by associate professor Maryam Gusheh, senior lecturer Catherine Murphy and professor Nigel Bertram, the exhibition marks stage two of a three-stage project towards an actual house retrofit. Called “Better Life @ Home,” the project is part of the Monash Urban Lab research program at Monash Art, Design and Architecture (MADA) and is being undertaken with the support of the Australian Human Rights Commission. Masters of architecture students carried out research into Melbourne’s housing stock and typology and engaged with a client, Ben Gauntlett (Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Commissioner at the Australian Human Rights Commission), who brought a lived experience to the Disability and Discrimination Act regulations for buildings. These two types of knowing were brought together to push and pull design ideas for what could be altered, changed or refitted. In the MADA Gallery, the visitor occupied the architectural possibilities. Studies of domestic zones identified as Entry, Foyer, Garage, Kitchen and Bathroom were built as a series of connecting spaces that independently communicated their critical elements of retrofitting while also being arranged as a whole house. The whole brought an extra dimension to the exhibition, especially at the opening, when we all gathered in the kitchen for the speeches. The visitor passed through these zones, looping around a peripheral and extra-wide circulation route that at times ramped up and down. The students designed and constructed the rooms using rigid cardboard panel walls (Durra Panel) and purpose-made furniture elements in pine – real enough, but also unreal and temporary in the language of the exhibition. The experience was supported by expertly tuned typography and graphics, which were overlaid onto walls and the floor, by MADA lecturer Warren Taylor. Using the language of architectural drawings, these graphics showed how the garage might be used as a bedroom (indicated by a bed plan on the floor), where a toilet might be located, and so on. Each space demonstrated a range of concepts that could, relatively simply and in a kit-like way, be applied to existing housing: a garage door that admits light, thereby increasing amenity and possibilities for multi-use; looped circulation that removes the dead end; a large and highamenity bathroom; and a lower, table-style kitchen bench. A takeaway brochure was provided for each space, succinctly explaining in words and diagrams the suitability, functionality and amenity of the elements in sustaining the dignity of the occupant. Dignity was a guiding principle reflected in the non-institutional translation of the regulations. Each brochure was part of a larger publication of the case studies, echoing the structure of the elemental and the whole. The built spaces were the primary exhibition language, while the typological housing stock research occupied a second order as posters on the gallery wall. The research aligned design strategies with common house types – small and large detached dwellings, walk-up flats, town and row houses, and garage houses. This fascinating information, curated by MADA lecturer Tom Morgan, was presented as mapping and a visual catalogue. Constituting a valuable documentation of dwelling types and their spatial distribution in metropolitan Melbourne, it reveals the potential impact of retrofitting across our urban fabric. RetroFit Kit was a compelling, embodied experience, where the visitor was not looking “at” but being “in” in a way that allowed the potential of architecture to speak. RetroFit Kit: Design Tools for Making our Homes Accessible is part of a collaborative research project between Monash Architecture and the Australian Human Rights Commission and was exhibited at the MADA Gallery, 22 to 30 March 2022. 01 The installation allowed visitors to experience the kit-like elements for adapting existing housing.

Be inspired by Australia’s best homes

Photography: Toby Scott Architect: Owen Architecture /

Australia and the rest of the world subscriptions: +61 3 8699 1000 subscribe@archmedia.com.au

Publisher: Architecture Media Pty Ltd Level 6, 163 Eastern Road South Melbourne 3205 Victoria, Australia

Subscribe to HOUSES™ magazine at architecturemedia.com/store

Annual digital subscription (supplied by Zinio) 6 issues 1 year Instant delivery anywhere in the world A$49

Annual print subscription 6 issues Region 3 years 2 years 1 year 6 months Australia A$219 A$149 A$79 A$39.50 US/Canada US$269 US$187 US$97 US$48.50 Rest of World Air A$355 A$242 A$125 A$62.50