XIAO ARCHITECTURE
JANUARY 17th, 2012
DESIGN
PROTFOLIO
WANJING XIAO waxiao@syr.edu 315-4501617 138 Redfield place, Syracuse, NY 13210
EDUCATION 2007 - present
Syracuse University School Of Architecture Bachelor of Architecture expected GPA: 3.31 Design GPA:3.88 Thesis: ILLEGAL LINKAGE -- Transition of Beijing Informal Urbanism New York City Program (SHoP Architects) Spring 2011 Study abroad in Florence, Italy Fall 2010
2006-2007
Beijing University Of Technology School Of Architecture Urban Planning Major
2003-2006
Beijing No.8 Middle School 1st Prize: High School Graphic Design Competition
AWARDS 2011 2010 2009 2009 - present 2007 - present
SKILLS
2
Grant: Raph T Walker Travel Prize -- Thesis Project Research 2nd Prize: King & King Prize -- Comprehensive Design Award 1st Prize: Slivers Prize -- Architecture Design Competition Dean’s List : School of Architecture Exhibited: Paintings, drawings and sculpture exhibited in SU College of Visual Art.
Fabrication
Software
Laser Cutter Foam Wood Plexiglass
Adobe CS5 CorelDRW
Language AutoCAD Rhino -- V-Ray SketchUp -- iRender
Cinema 4D Premiere Windows Movie Maker
Mandarin English Italian (Functional)
EXPERIENCE 2011 summer
Buro Ole Scheeren,
Beijing [Architectural Intern]
Collaborated with competition team on Wuhan Wanlin Art Museum design, including schematic design phase. Produced site analysis, design concept storyline and final diagrams, massing study and schematic design development. Assisted in preparing presentation slides. 2010 summer
Beijing Institute of Architectural Design ,
Beijing [Architectural Intern]
Collaborated on design development. Produced detail construction drawings for large scale hotel and residential projects. Studied Chinese building code, and produced construction documents. Assisted in urban planning project. 2009 summer
R&D Design , Shanghai [Architectural Intern] Assisted principal with management of pavilion and Spa Villas in design process and budget control, schematic design and design development. Produced design drawings, construction drawings, study models and final representational model. Presented to partner studios in design team meeting.
2008 summer
Thinking Hands 798 Art District, Beijing [Art Director Assistant] Book design, image editing. Coordinated book publisher and translator. Assisted Chinese artist Rui Huang (co-funder of 798 Art District) in book publishing.
2007 summer
Prevention From Mammary Cancer,
Beijing [Medical Volunteer]
3
CONTENTS
2009
RESEARCH
2010
2011
DESIGN
4
ISSUE TIME
ISSUE TIME
ISSUE TIME
ISSUE TIME
ISSUE TIME
ISSUE TIME
ISSUE TIME
ISSUE TIME
ISSUE TIME
REPRESENTATION
2007
2008
BUILDING SYSTEM
ISSUE TIME
1. GREEN SLEEVE
7-21
2. CULTURE COLLECTOR
23-35
3. MUSEUM OF AGRICULTURE
37-39
4. VERTICAL CITY / EDUCATIONAL CENTER
41-45
5. CHONGQING SOUTH SPA VILLA
47-53
6. SHRINKING CITY
55-61
7. CONTESTED SIGHT
63-69
8. BUILDING SYSTEM
71-77
9. SHENYANG T6 HOTEL + RESIDENTS
79-87
10. DRAWINGS
89-92
SITE: MANHATTAN -- COLLABORATED WITH PASRADIS DISKUL
SITE: MANHATTAN -- COLLABORATED WITH XIAO CHEN
SITE: TUSCANY
SYRACUSE
2009 INTERN -- R&D DESIGN
SYRACUSE NATURAL SETTING
FLUSHING COMMONS
BUILDING ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL
2010 INTERN
5
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
GREEN SLEEVE 2010 Spring Collaborated With Pasradis Diskul Site And Task: Manhattan Bowery Street Provide Environmental Controlled Space For Cultural And Social Events Award: King+King Prize -- Comperhensive Design Award (2Nd Place)
7
GREEN SLEEVE -- Bowery Hostel The bowery street is under critical transformation, leaving the gap between rich/poor, new comers/existing residents and different age groups. Culture facilities on bowery community are disappearing. Therefore this hostel is created to engage different users on the site, by re-establishing the public space to allow social and cultural events taking place, while also being revealed on the facade, creating a new atmosphere on bowery. These public activities flow along a green void, splitting the building mass. To provide adaptable rooms for varies users, the interior also adopt green house structure. EXERCISE 2: SITE RESEARCH ARC308 | PROF. THOMAS
2000 + Commercial user Local Commercial user Domestic user
1950 - 1949
New user (within 2 years)
< 1924
The map shows sales of neighboring properties. Find out how recent the property has been sold. For Condos and Coops the value is not reflective.
Tax value paid per square foot for eachproperty.
1950 - 1999
Old user
In this color-coded map,view the year each property was built.
GREENWICH VILLAGE
BOWERY 09
BOWERY Home of many music halls in the 19th century, the Bowery later became notable for its economic depression. In the 1920s and 1930s, it was regarded as an impoverished area. The "Dead End Kids" (aka the "The Bowery Boys") of film were from the Bowery. In the 1940s through the 1970s, the Bowery was New York City's "Skid Row," notable for "Bowery Bums" (alcoholics and homeless persons).
EAST VILLAGE
In the 1960s and 1970s, the Bowery was viewed as a high-crime, low-rent area. However, since the 1990s the entire Lower East Side has been reviving. As of July 2005, gentrification is contributing to ongoing change along the Bowery. In particular, the number of high-rise condominiums is growing. In 2006, AvalonBay Communities opened its first luxury apartment complex on the Bowery, which included an upscale Whole Foods Market. Avalon Bowery Place was quickly followed with the development of Avalon Bowery Place II in 2007. That same year, the SANAA-designed facility for the New Museum of Contemporary Art opened at the corner of Prince Street. The new development has not come without a social cost. Michael Dominic's documentary Sunshine Hotel followed the lives of residents of one of the few remaining flophouses.
BOW
EXERCISE 2: SITE RESEARCH ARC308 | PROF. THOMAS
NOLITA
ERY
SOHO
The Bowery from Houston to Delancey Streets serves as New York's principal market for restaurant equipment, and from Delancey to Grand for lamps.
BOWERY 03
$200,000+/year $80,000 - $200,000/year $20,000 - $80,000/year
EAST VILLAGE
Crammed (above 26,000)
Age 40 - 45 Age 30 - 35
Less than $20,000/year SITE
LITTLE ITALY
METRO STATION TRAFFIC DIRECTION
AVERAGE WEATHER
Boweryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Whitehouse Hotel
Median household income is used to provide data about geographic areas and divides households into two equal segments with the first half of households earning less than the median household income.
Downtown Auto Center
8
BOWERY COLLAGE STREET ELEVATION SOUTH
Population median age marks the point where half the population is older than that age and half is younger.
Population density is the number of persons per unit of area.
SITE PLAN
EXERCISE 2: SITE RESEARCH ARC308 | PROF. THOMAS
BOWERY 04
MODEL ON SITE
SITE SECTION
Bowery Service
Egress Zone
Residential Bowery Hotel
Bowery Hotel
9 BOWERY COLLAGE STREET ELEVATION NORTH
1 SHELL
STRUCTURE
SOIL
GREEN HOUSE THE HOSTEL DESIGN IS INSPIRED BY GREENHOUSE IN ITS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL AND SPATIAL FLEXIBILITY
10
10
GREENHOUSE SYSTEM HEAT: Plants have definite temperature requirements; temperature beyond their limits generally causes serious growth or disease problems. The night temperature of a greenhouse dictates what plants can be grown in it.
LIGHT FRAME STRUCUTRE EXPOSED TO INTERIOR
TYPICAL GREENHOUSE STRUCTURE
HUMIDITY: Amount of humidity needed is closely related to the temperature. VENTILATION: Both the temperature and humidity are immediately affected by ventilation. An increase in ventilation will lower the temperature and generally will lower the humidity as well, unless the weather is extremely wet.
HEARTH SLEEPING COLD FRAME LIVING COLD FRAME BALCONY
STRUCTURE FRAMES DIFFERENT THERMAL ZONES
TRUSSES MARK THE THERMAL ZONE AND PROVIDE DIVISION FOR DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS
LIGHT: An increase in light level will usually cause a plant to grow faster and bloom sooner, but too much light will burn the leaves. The optimum amount of light varies enormously with different species and at different stages in the life of a plant. 1| EXHAUST FAN 2| TRUSSES Provides space and structure for mechanical system and water spray 3| AIR HANDELER dries and heat the air in greenhouse 4| ELECTRICITY 5| ARTIFICAL LIGHTING increases production of photosynthetic when needed 6| WATER SPRAY for ajustment of humidity 7| VALVE 8| WATER PUMP 9| DRIP IRRIGATION AND SPRAY IRRGATION for roots watering 10| SOIL BASE 11| HEATER to keep soil temperature at 13 - 20C
TRUSSES FOR HUNGING EQUIPMENTS MAXIMIZING THE CLEAR SPACE
LIGHT FRAME STRUCTURE PROVIDE DROPCEILING CONDITION FOR LIGHTING AND FIXTURES ENHANCE FLEXIBILITY IN EACH ROOM
WATER SPRAY SYSTEM CONTROLS HUMIDITY IN GREENHOUSE WHILE WATERING THE VEGETATIONS
RAIN WATER COLLECTION FOR WATERING AND HUMIDITY CONTROL
11
MODEL ON SITE MATERIAL: MUSEUM BOARD, BASSWOOD, PLEXIGLASS
12
HOSTEL FLOOR
LOBBY
13
EXTRUDED-ALUMINUM UNIT FRAME
CLEAR INSULATING GLASS WITH LOW-E COATING
STEEL BEAM
EARTH SOIL
WATER PIPE (WATERING PLANTS) WATER PROOF MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION
METAL PIPE (RADIANT FLOOR HEATING) OVERHEAD ALUMINUM SUPPORT TRACK STEEL PIPE LOUVER SUPPORT
GLASS VERTICAL GLASS LOUVERS GLASS RAINWATER COLLECTION PIPE
METAL RAILINGS
METAL PLATE EARTH SOIL WATER PIPE (WATERING PLANTS) RIGID INSULATION TWO-WAY FLAT PLATE CONCRETE SLAB PLASTIC FOAM INSULATION (THERMAL BREAK)
RIGID INSULATION (THERMAL BREAK) BATT INSULATION (THERMAL BREAK)
METAL OPEN-WEB JOISTS
TYPICAL ROOM AND FACADE
14
PRECAST CONCRETE PRECAS SLAB
CONCRETE COLUMN
SERVICE CORE
TRUSSES AS DROP DRO CEILING IN “GREEN“GREEN HOUSE” ZONE
STRUCTURE
MECHANICAL ROOM / RAIN WATER COLLECTION AND WATER TOWER HYDRONIC RADIANT FLOOR
GLASS WATER PIPE : WATERING SYSTEM AND PASSIVE COOLING CEILING MOUNTED A/C
FRESH AIR IN-TAKE RADIANT FLOOR HEATING
MECHANIAL ROO: BOILER AND CHILLER WATER TANK FOR RAIN WATER COLLECTION
Pasradis Diskul & Wanjing Xiao
MECHANICAL
HEATED AIR
COOL AIR
BUILDING SYSTEM
EGRESS 15
16
17
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
XL
M/S
XL
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
M/S
XL
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
M/S
XL
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
M/S
XL
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
PARK MARKET / PARK
18
FOOD MARKET
XL
ENTRANCE
ROOF
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
M/S
GREENHOUSE
ROOF
M/S
LIVING ROOM
LIVING ROOM
XL
XL LIVING ROOM
COMMUNAL ROOM DINNING LOUNGE LOBBY
MARKET
COMMUNAL ROOM
LIVING ROOM
LIVING ROOM
MARKET / PARK
ENTRANCE MARKET / PARK
DINNING LOUNGE LOBBY
MARKET
M.S ROOM / LOUNGE / ROOF TERRACE
M/S
COMMUNAL SPACE
PRIVA VATE VA ATE
TERRACE GARDEN
ROOF
M/S XL
TERRACE
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
M/S
ENTRANCE TO ROOF TERRACE
M/S M/S
COMMUNAL ROOM
M/S
DINNING LOUNGE LOBBY
LOBBY
LOUN UNGE UN TAKE OUT FOOD
MARKET
M/S ROOM
M/S
LOBBY
MAIN ENTRANCE
INTERN RNET RN ET CA CAF FE F E
RES EST TAURA TA RAN RA NT
RESTAURANT ENTRANCE
TERRACE
XL ROOM / COMMUNAL SPACE/ GREENHOUSE
COMMUNAL ROOM DINNING LOUNGE LOBBY
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
XL
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
XL
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
XL
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
XL
COMMUNAL SPACE
XL
LOUNGE TAKE OUT FOOD
MARKET
GREENHOUSE
XL
ENTRANCE TO GREENHOUSE
LOBBY
COMMUNAL SPACE
LOBBY
MAIN ENTRANCE
INTERNET CAFE F FE
RESTA T URANT TA
RESTAURANT ENTRANCE
MARKET / PARK / LOBBY / GREENHOUSE
XL
GREENHOUSE
PUBLIC
SEMI-PRIVA VATE VA ATE
ROOF
M/S
ROOF
TERRACE TE
GREENHOUSE
RAIN WATER COLLECTION SHOW CASE
GREENHOUSE
M/S
ROOF TERRRACE ENTRANCE
XL COMMUNAL ROOM DINNING LOUNGE LOBBY
LOBBY
PARK LOUN LO UNGE UN
T E OUT FOO TAK OOD OO
MARKET
MARKET
LANDSCAPE
LOBBY
MAIN ENTRANCE
I N TE TERN RNET RN ET CA CAF FE F E
RES EST TAURA TA RAN RA NT
19
RESTAURANT ENTRANCE
XL ROOM
XL ROOM
20
LOBBY
21
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
CULTURE COLLECTOR 2011 Spring Collaborated With Xiao Chen Site And Task: Manhattan Connection Of Highline And 7 Train Extension
23
Life Culture
? Nature
Work
Fun
New Developmen t
High Line
7 Line
Aimless P edestrian
CULTURE COLLECTOR Situated between the end of highline and 7 train, this site is challenged by the large flow of aimless pedestrian. To optimize the circulation, a culture collector is designed to collect inefficient pedestrian and pump them back through efficient path. 24 Circulation Hu
b
Cu lt ural So luti on Pro gram
HIGH LINE CONTEMPORARY ART
CULTURAL CUL C LTURAL COLLECTOR COL OLL OR
7 LINE POP CULTURE
Theme
Nature / Exhibition
Laundry
Information
Fitness
Supporting Program
Recreation
Bike
Reversed ersed Position
PROMENADE
Social / Daily Life
THEME PROGRAM
SUPPORTING PROGRAM
Information
25
STUDY MODELS MASSING MODELS FOR DESIGN CONCEPT AND ARCHITECTURAL FORM
26
27
FINAL MODEL MATERIAL: MUSEUM BOARD, PLEXIGLASS, GRASS POWDER, SCALED FIGURES
28
STUDY MODEL
STUDY MODEL
STUDY MODEL 29
30
SECTION
SECTION 1”=16’
31
32
33
34
STUDY MODEL MAETRIAL: FORM CORE, BLUE FORM
35
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
1
MUSEUM OF AGRICULTURE 2
3
1 FARMING TOOL EXHIBITION / EDUCATION 2 TRUFFLE EXHIBITION 3 BASE SOIL STUDY / ECO TANK
4
4 SEED BANK 5 RECEPTION 6 OFFICE
2010 Fall Program: Museum Site And Task: San Miniato, Tuscany, Italy
7 DIRECTOR OFFICE
5
7
6
37
LAND TYPE STUDY THIS STUDY HELPED TO DESIGN THE MAJOR VISIT ROUTE
1
1
2
3
2
3
4
1 FARMING TOOL EXHIBITION / EDUCATION 2 TRUFFLE EXHIBITION 3 BASE SOIL STUDY / ECO TANK
4
4 SEED BANK 5 RECEPTION 6 OFFICE 7 DIRECTOR OFFICE
1 TEMPORARY EXHIBITION 2 ORGANIC KITCHEN 3 DINNING
5
4 ECO TANK 5 FARMING LAB 5
7
38
6
WATER STORAGE
RAINWATER COLLECTION / ECO TANK
WATER DISTRIBUTION
CIR
CUL
ATIO
N
PRIM
ARY
SE
WATER CIRCULATION
CO
C O M PO N EN T
STR
UCT
UR
E
WA TER
ND
AR YS
TR
UC
TU
RE
SY
STE
M
STRUCTURE
SECTION MUSEUM ACTIVITIES AND MAJOR VISIT ROUTE
39
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
VERTICAL CITY / EDUCATIONAL CENTER 2009 Spring Vertical City Award: Sliver Prize -- Second Year Design Award (1St Place) 2008 Fall Educational Center
41
42
43
EDUCATIONAL CENTER
44
45
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
CHONGQING SOUTH SPA VILLA 2009 INTERN 2009 Summer Collaborated With R&D Design Chongqing, China
47
SITE PLAN
MODEL WITH SITE
landscape designed by Old Farm Landscape
collaborated with Old Farm Landscape
48
MODEL WITH SITE Final Model Produced For R&D Design
49
TYPE A SINGLE FLOOR VILLA DESIGN FOR COUPLES
50
51
52
TYPE B DOUBLE FLOOR VILLA DESIGN FOR FAMILIES 53
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
1834
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1834
1898
1923
1898
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1937
1969
2009
1834
WATER DRUMBLIN
1898
1923
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
SECTION 2
SHRINKING CITY ARC 307 2009 Fall Site : Syracuse, Ny Analyze The Based Natrual Setting Factors That Cause Syracuse To Be A Shrinking City
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1834
1923
1898
1923
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
1834
1898
1937 1923
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
55
SECTION 1
1834
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1834
1898
1898
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT
1923
1937
1969
2009
1834
WATER DRUMBLIN
1898
1923
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
SECTION 2
SECTION 3
NATURAL SETTING NATURAL SETTING
SECTION 4
1834 1898
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT
1923
1834
1898
1923
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1937
1969
2009
1834
WATER DRUMBLIN
1898
1937 1923
1937
1969
2009
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
1923 1937 1969 2009
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT
URBAN EXPENSION PROGRAM AND1834 TOPOGRAPHY
1898
1923
1937
1969
2009
Salt spring has been found near the Onondaga Lake, which set the base developing point of Syracuse in the lowest part of valley.
56
WATER DRUMBLIN
During industrialization, the major program of Syracuse shifted from entertainment to manufactory. Thus the city expended towards the inner
The establishment of education institutions reactivated the city in the early 1900s, moving the employment core up to the drumlins area.
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1834
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1834
1969
1898
1923
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
1898
1923
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
Movement Direction
Topography and Bedrock
TOPOGRAPHY FORCE URBAN MOVEMENT Surrounded by drumlins, city of Syracuse is under the pressure from its topography condition. Highlands on north and east create a strong centripetal force towards the lowest and flattest area in the valley, which located downtown Syracuse in the early years. The gap between uplands forms tunnel for transportations. After the highways built alone the tunnels, they become the access that people escape from urban lands. Thus the central commercial area has also been moved alone the direction of transportations.
Topography Force
57
ENTERTAINMENT
1834
SALT INDUSTRY
1898
1923 COMMERCIAL
1937
EDUCATION
OVERLAY
1969
VALLEY AREA URBAN TEXTURE
RESIDENTIAL
2009 YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1834
58
1898
1923
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
Small (generally less than 25 feet tall)
•Alternate-leaf Dogwood
•American Hornbeam
•Eastern Hophornbeam
•Blackhaw
•Gray Birch
•Nannyberry
Paw Paw
•Serviceberry
DOWNTOWN
Medium (generally 25 to 50 feet tall)
•Blackgum or Black Tupelo
•Eastern Hemlock
•Red Maple
•River Birch
•White Spruce
•White Ash
MIDTOWN
Large (generally 50 to 75 feet or more tall)
•Black Maple
•Bur Oak
•Eastern White Pine •Northern Red Oak
•Sugar Maple
•Swamp White Oak
•White Oak
SUBURBAN
SYRACUSE NATIVE SPECIES
59
SALT PRODUCTION
Syracuse Development --Natural resource & Geography
Erie canal at salina street.
In 1600s, French settlers found Syracuse as a new settlement area. The salt spring has been found in early 1700s, which attracted thousands of Europeans to Syracuse and contribute in developing the salt industry. During 1700~ 1850, the development was relied on the geographic conditions. Erie Canal was served as major transportation to other towns; the business area has been built alone the canal. Swamp was used as mill pound and generated power to support the civic use. After the industry revolution, the mill has no longer used as major power resource. Thus the mill pond was also filled during that time. In the late 1800, William Galbraith manufactured salt from lake and put Syracuse on his salt bag. The first railroad arrived in the city in 1839, which challenged the canal in the next few decades. While the City of Syracuse expended, the topography has no longer limited the boundary. The economic center shifted from lake to downtown, up to university hill.
Salt sheds c. 1908
South Salina Street c. 1905
CIVIC SALT PRODUCTION
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1834
COMMERCIAL
1834 1898
1923
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
1834
COMMERCIAL
1898
1898
1923
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
1834
1898
1923
1834
1937 1898
1923
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT 1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
1834
1969 1898
1923
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
EDUCATION
EDUCATION
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT
1937
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
1923
1969
2009
2009
1834
WATER DRUMBLIN
1898
1923
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
60
Onondaga Community College
Le Moyne College was founded
1962
1964
2009
Syracuse's population peaked at 221,000
1800~ 1900
1847
1824
SYRACUSE TIME LINE
1950
Salt company
Bussines and stores were established
Syracuse University chartered as MethodistEpiscopal institution
1870
Railway
Village of Syracuse and Village of Salina combined.
1847
CORINTH
SYRACUSE Name after Syracuse, Sicily, Italy
MILAN 1809
1817
BOGARDUS CORNERS
1796
SOUTH SALINA
WEBSTERâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S LANDING 1786
1812
SALT POINT 1780
1600s
French Settlers
POPULATIONS
SOIL TYPE YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT
47
URBAN LAND
1834
1898
1923
1937
1969
2009
WATER DRUMBLIN
SYRACUSE URBAN GEOGRAPHY
15 17
SOIL FORMED IN THIN GLACIALTILL DEPOSITS OVER BEDROOK AND EXCESSIVELY DRAINED TO MODERATELY WELL DRAINED; SLOPING
20
SOIL FORMED IN THIN GLACIALTILL DEPOSITS OVER BEDROOK AND EXCESSIVELY DRAINED TO MODERATELY WELL DRAINED; STEEP
37
DEEP SOIL FORMED IN GRAVELLY AND SANDY GLACIAL OUTWASH ON OLD ALLUVIAL FANS,TER RACES; SLOPING
1
DEEP SOILS WITHOUT FRAGIPANS THAT FORMED IN GLACIAL TILL AND ARE WELL DERAINED AND MODERATELY WELL DRAINED; SLOPING
7 8
DEEP SOILS WITHOUT FRAGIPANS THAT FORMED IN GLACIAL TILL AND ARE WELL DERAINED AND MODERATELY WELL DRAINED; STEEP
WATER DRUMBLIN
TOPOGRAPHY CHANGE 0-8
9-18
19-27
28-36
37-40
41-48&MORE
WATER DRUMBLIN
OVERLAY
YEAR OF DEVELOPMENT DEVE OPMENT SL SOIL OIL TYPE TOPOGRAPHY CHANGE
61
r t
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
RETA
ILS
F lu s h
1
Mayor Bloomberg
ommo
KILLS
Sma
President of Korean Business on union street
People come from China, and when they look at Flushing, they say, ‘This is the way China was 15 years ago; It is amajor developments that promise to refashion the neighborhood’s landscape’. -NT Times
in g C
ns
sine ll Bu
PA R K I N G
more SPA CE s s less RATE
Ikhwan Rim
It will bring a lot of pedes train traffic, in the end, for everyone -Letter of Councilman
3 2
4
Rockfeller Developers
Small Business Owener
Councilman Peter koo
TDC development
1979
1986
1991
2000
2005 1
2
3
Union Street structure attracted Korean buyers, a lot of apar tments were purchased by Koreans
Flushing’s economic boom led by increasing asian population. Municipal Parking was planned to transform to cmmercial complex.
Economy kills contested plan for Flushing project. The project was not economically viable.
Asians in Flushing par ticipate in government, becoming the one of the council.
Mayor Bloomberg announced in July 2005 that a joint venture of The Rockefeller Group and TDC Development has been selected to redevelop a five-acre site in downtown Flushing
2
4
5
2007
2010 Jan.
For reasons that are unclear, the project was put on hold in 2007
Until 2010 suddenly the project reemerging in January when the EDC initiated the public review process.
2010 Feb.- July
5
Months of CB 7 process, Flushing Commons was eventually approved by City Council.
2010 Sept.
CONTESTED SIGHTS ARC 500
2011 Spring Collaborated With Xiao Chen Architecture Tour And Analysis On Flushing Commons
Flushing Commons deal is done after the re-approval of CB 7. Since then, the project is waiting for its founds to get itself build.
63
FLUSHING COMMONS
LOCATION MAP
Flushing, Queens. This mega parking structure was built in 1962 aiming to bring the people living in suburbs to city, where they could drop their cars and take public transportation to Manhattan. This redevelopment plans to transform the parking lot into a mixed-use project, containing residential, commercial and community facility and triggered the tension
When the city decides to expand and develop, and a public amenity, such as a low rate parking lot, has been taken over by this development, a series of controversy has been caused between small business and government, competition between Asian immigrants groups and development vs. preservation. Flushing Commons is located at 39th Avenue and Union Street at the site of Municipal Lot 1, downtown f ide o er s y. h t o r he nda on t bou ness ss the i s u b ro ese ld c Chin ng wou i 99 small korean businesses stood park together and fought for the parking lot.
64
the bound ary line div ided Korea Chinese b n and usiness.
Mu par nicipa l kin g fo Parki r Fl ng L ush o ing t 1 se , an r d a ves 1 lwa 1 ys 01 pac ke
d.
between small business and politicians and developers. Remote from the heart of Manhattan, Downtown Flushing was less affected by New York City's commodity prices; which has established Flushing as a thriving place for immigrant start up businesses. Since the 1980s Flushing has been developed rapidly, that area and a close community become a densely packed. The local business owners see parking lots as great asset, where their customers park when they come to Flushing. Currently, the price of park in this lot is as low as 3 dollars per 12hr. When the new parking lot being built, the rate will be increased to more than double of its current price. Therefore, small business owners are afraid of losing costumers. Recent discussion of this Bloomberg's agenda in Flushing has involved the future image of Flushing, boundary
between Chinese and Korean businesses and demand of parking. With the creation of Flushing Commons, business owners on Union Street and community groups fear it will overwhelm them, driving out their business which have made the image of Flushing over the history. In the controversy, mayor Bloomberg and TDC and Rockefeller developers feel the need to expand Flushing for a better business center up to its current density. This development became a core issue with Flushing's growth. A series of discussions have sparked regarding the preservation of small business on Union Street during the expanding of the city. This fight illustrates the privatized transformation of a long term contributing public used land. During the development of a city, an alternative plan is needed to bridge the transition gap.
TDC Development tries to transform Flushing.
Drivers leave their car to occupy for more than half day since its low rate.
65
Fight Fo
r Parkin g -Small Bu siness
7
Parking
“for sale ” -Develo pers
6
End 5
3 2
“Demol
ish me? ” -Flushin gM
all
4
1
AR ST
T
Division Line Between Chinese and Korean Commercial Office
66
Residential
1. NEW CHINATOWN SUPERMARKET
5. MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT 1
New Chinatown supermarket represent a transformation of Flushing to an Asian land as it replaces the biggest supermarket serving for Americans. It also supplies the local residents with Asian food at a low price compared to Manhattan.
2. LIRR-MAIN ST.
Municipal Parking Lot 1 was built in 1960s, from then it serves as a entry parking lot for who is coming to Manhattan. It provide 1101 parking space with surprising low rate. It will be replaced by the Flushing Commons project, which becomes the biggest debate in Flushing.
6. MACEDONIA CHURCH LIRR-Main Street is also serving as way go to Manhattan. Next to the station, there are also parking space with low rate, which people believe would be busy and packed during the construction of Flushing Commons.
3. MAIN STREET-ROOSEVELT AVE.
Macedonia Church started out as a place for minority groups. As a portion of parking lot, city used eminent domain to acquire this property in order to build 140 affordable housing units, ground-floor retail space, a day-care center, and church.
7. UNION STREET
This is the stop on the No. 7 subway line is the third busiest street and intersection in New York City. There are 19 city buses stop at downtown, and 40,000 people reside. They serve as a spine in Flushing.
Union Street is next to the municipal parking lot 1, where resides 99 small business merchants within one block, who believe Flushing Commons would kill their business. The signage well express the characteristic of the cluster businesses.
8. QUEENS CROSSING
4. FLUSHING MALL The Flushing Mall was created in 2001 by the same developer at the site of a vacant former warehouse. It is expected to be torn down next year to have 600 parking since construction of Flushing Commons.
Queens Crossing sits next to the parking lot. It is built by TDC development and serves as TDCâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s headquarter. The Queens Crossing opened in 2008, catering to the increasingly affluent Chinese and Korean immigrants, and especially to second generation Asian-American families. 67
Flushing is one of the most vibrant and diverse neighborhoods not just in New York City but in the world, and today marks a major milestone in our effor ts to build on that vibrancy and position Flushing for long-term economic growth. -NYC.Gov
RETA
ILS
People come from China, and when they look at Flushing, they say, ‘This is the way China was 15 years ago; It is amajor developments that promise to refashion the neighborhood’s landscape’. -NT Times
1
Mayor Bloomberg
3 2
Rockfeller Developers
Councilman Peter ko
TDC development
1963
1979
1986
1991
2000
Flushing Queens approved 2D deck for Municipal Parking Lot 1.68
Union Street structure attracted Korean buyers, a lot of apar tments were purchased by Koreans
Flushing’s economic boom led by increasing asian population. Municipal Parking was planned to transform to cmmercial complex.
Economy kills contested plan for Flushing project. The project was not economically viable.
Asians in Flushing par ticipate in government, becoming the one of the council.
Once the spots at the municipal parking lot are gone, every business will suffer -NY Times
i Flush
5
mmo o C g n
KILLS
ns
PA R K I N G
more SPA CE l s e s s s R ATE sine u B l Smal
President of Korean Business on union street
Ikhwan Rim
It will bring a lot of pedestrain traffic, in the end, for everyone -Letter of Councilman
4
Small Business Owener
oo 2005 1
2
3
Mayor Bloomberg announced in July 2005 that a joint venture of The Rockefeller Group and TDC Development has been selected to redevelop a five-acre site in downtown Flushing
2
4
5
2007
2010 Jan.
For reasons that are unclear, the project was put on hold in 2007
Until 2010 suddenly the project reemerging in January when the EDC initiated the public review process.
2010 Feb.- July
5
Months of CB 7 process, Flushing Commons was eventually approved by City Council.
2010 Sept. Flushing Commons deal is done after the re-approval of CB 7. Since then, the project is waiting 69 for its founds to get itself build.
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
BUILDING SYSTEM ARC 423 2011 Spring Analyze Building System, Propose Improvements Based On Study Collaborated With Xiao Chen, Wei-Yi Tseng And Clifford Shih
71
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square
Syracuse School of Architecture
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square Syracuse School of Architecture Fall 2011
Geographic location
Building and Site Orient Humid Continental Climate: A hot (or very warm) version of a continental climate features an average temperature of at least 22 °C (71.6 °F) in its warmest month. The warmest month is usually July, though in some cases, it can be in August. In this region, July afternoon temperatures average up to 32 °C (90 °F), while the January mean temperature can be far below −3 °C (26.6 °F).
72.7
o
Summer solar angle June 21st Humid Continental Climate (Warm Summer)
8am
Geographic Influence
Winters are cold and damp, and prevailing wind patterns Juneminimize 21st 10am that blow offshore the moderating effects of the Atlantic Ocean. Yet the Atlantic and the partial shielding of the Appalachians the city 11keep Hours at least 25% warmer in the winter than inland North American cities
June 21st
12pm
June 21st
4pm
June 21st
7pm 25.8
of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight
o
6 Hours at least 60% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight
Dec. 21st
8am
" the urban heat island effect". It is caused by the large number of buildings, sidewalks and other surfaces that limit green growt such as grass and trees. Surfaces with green areas offer high moisture levels that cool the air when the moisture evaporates from soil and plants.
June 21st
Winter solar angle
11pm
June 21st
12pm
June 21st
2pm
June 21st
4pm
8 Hours at least 25% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight 3 Hours at least 50% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight
Shadow studies
Building and Site
20.October 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Building and Site
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square
47th fl. - 52th fl.
Professor M Pelken
Syracuse School of Architecture
ARC 423_623
Fall 2011
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square 52
Programming
38th fl. - 46th fl.
Core: 5,713 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 24,831
Core Steel Frame
27 Conference
17th fl. - 26th fl.
Core: 6,828 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 30,494
Syracuse School of Architecture 2011 Nast 4 Times Square Exercise 1: Building Analysis Fall of Condé
In Four Time Squares, the architect designs the core as the primary load bearing structure; therefore, concrete is being used. Yet, the frame structure that the architect designs have a clear idea that free up the interior space from bearing walls; as a result, this will generate more profit.
38
27th fl. - 37th fl.
Core: 6,828 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 27,491
17
9th fl. - 16th fl.
Core: 8,075 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 33,580
9 Ground Lobby
8th fl.
Core: 8075 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 39,000
8
Office space
Circulation Core Lobby Retail
Ground fl. -7th fl.
Core: 8075 sq.ft. Lobby: 11,077 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24000 sq.ft. Total: 44,395
G
Office Core: first layer
Frame Structure: second layer
Loading zone Service
72
20.October 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Beams: secondary
Professor M Pelken
Footer should be placed here
Architectural Design
Beams: primary
Structure System ARC 20. October. 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao 423_623
20. October. 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Footer should be placed here
o
25
o
Billboard / Skyline
27. September 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Core: 21, 248 sq. ft. Rentable Space: 0 sq.ft. Total: 21,248
72
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
Professor M Pelken
ARC
Syracuse School of Architecture Fall 2011 Syracuse School of Architecture Fall 2011
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square
Syracuse School of Architecture
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square
Percentage and Quality of Openings
Photovolatic panel
COOLING TOWER NATURAL GAS WATER
power converter from AC to DC
Cooling tower
Found on the 37th to 43rd floor, south and Heating / Cooling east side of the facade.
Water tank Fuel (Natural gas) Absorption Chiller/Heater
HOT WATER
Fall 2011
The PV panels are integrated in the spandrel, doubling as both cirtain wall and power generator. Supply up to 15kw of power
conduit housing in channel structure
CHILLED WATER
pv cell
West 78%
South
59%
52%
North
Electrical system Structural Systems
20. October 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao 7. September 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao 20. October
East
2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
76%
ARC 423_623 ARC 423_623
Professor M Pelken Professor M Pelken
Mechanics System
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
73
Sy
Exercise 2: Building Intervention of Condé Nast 4 Times Square Installation
Raised Ceiling Eliminating Air Duct
Modularized Floor Pattern
9” Raised Floor For Data System, Electricity and Air Duct
74
06. December. 2011 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi Tseng, Clifford Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins
Floor System Interv
yracuse School of Architecture
Fall 2011
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square
Syracuse School of Architecture
Fall 2011
Typical Wall Curtain wall structure is detached from structure system, allowing facade pattern to be not regulated by structure pattern but directly responding to its surrounding context and enhancing its performance.
Facade
In the existing typical floor plan, the partition walls are constructed to reroute electricity circuit. To free up the tenant space, the concrete floor can be lifted up for 9 inches to allow electricity and air duct run under the floor. This also increases the floor height by eliminating the air duct in the drop ceiling, which brings more natural light into the office space.
Low-e Glass Curtain Wall
Connector Scheduled Gauge & Spacing
Masonry Structure Elements
6 in Concrete Slab
Footer should be placed here
Footer should be placed here
20.October 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Structure System
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square
Syracuse School of Architecture
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
Fall 2011
Curtain Wall Curtain wall structure is detached from structure system, allowing facade pattern to be not regulated by structure pattern but directly responding to its surrounding context and enhancing its performance.
Low Ceiling
Facade
Fixed Floor Lay Out Connector Scheduled Gauge & Spacing
Low-e Glass Curtain Wall / Photovoltaic Panel
Steel Columns
Structure Elements
Unefficient Conventional System
vention: Raise Floor
6 in Concrete Slab
20.October 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Structure System
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
75 Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
Syracuse School of Architecture
Exercise 2: Building Intervention of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square
Fall 2011
Green Roof
Green Wall
Original Condition 06. December. 2011 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi Tseng, Clifford Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins
76
Proposed Condition
Comparison
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
Syracuse School of Architecture
Exercise 2: Building Intervention of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square
Fall 2011
Green Wall
Raised Floor
Original Condition 06. December. 2011 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi Tseng, Clifford Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins
Proposed Condition
Comparison
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
77
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
SHENYANG T6 HOTEL+RESIDENTS 2010 INTERN 2010 Summer Collaborated With BIAD -- Studio 6A5 Construction Documents For T6 Hotel And Residential Towers Shenyang, China 2011 Summer Site Visit Trip to Shenyang
79
120 850 600
870
1200
820
60 310
1100
600
100
250 1200 200
2250
1400
90
150 100 600
250
1200 100 150 100
760
2M01-1223(甲)
100 100 150
1300
1510 M1223
M1223
600
90
1100
150
100
100 100 150 1200
2M01-1223(甲)
100 150 100
设备管井
1200
1M01-1121(甲) 100 90 600 150450 1860
正压 送风
自垂百页正压送风口600x600 F2,F6,F10,F14,F20,F24,F28 F32,F36,F40,F44,F48，F52 地下部分 底距地1.500m B3,B2,B1 地上部分 底距地1.500m
上18
2M01-1223(乙)
1100
自垂百页正压送风口600x600 F1,F5,F9,F13,F17,F21,F25,F29 F33,F37,F41,F45,F49,F53,F50,F54,F58 地下部分 底距地1.500m B3,B2,B1 地上部分 底距地1.500m
1800
TLM1822
4770
M1022
4770
1800 250
100
90
540 60 270x17=4590
90
正压送风
540
远控正压送风口600x1000 底距地1.400m B3~F54（11#楼到F52）
90 820 90
正压送风
60 540
600
450 2550
M0822
910 90 100 1000 910
250
2400
1450
150 300
LC2419
100 150
2002M01-1023(甲) 100 150 50 1000 400
800
150 100 下18
上18
LC04'19
250 TLM0822
2200
1200
1400 2690
电气管井 90 100
1300
200 100 600 2250
179
200 50
正压送风
1700 100
LC0919
2M01-1223(乙)
60 310
1000
M1022
1200
1200 250
2300
150
250 150
150 1000 250 LC2419 100
自垂百页正压送风口600x600 F2,F6,F10,F14,F20,F24,F28 F32,F36,F40,F44,F48，F52 地下部分 底距地1.500m B3,B2,B1 地上部分 底距地1.500m
250
250
100
150 100 2200
1400
100 690
100 250
100100 60 340 340 60
60
150 250
250
150
570
设备管井
250
正压 送风
2M01-1223(甲)
760
1200
600
200 150
540
0.500 1100
600
1M01-0821(丙)
90
2200
洞口1200x2300
250 1200
90
600
1M01-1121(甲) 250 90 600 450 1860
1100
1300
1510 100 1200 200 150 200 100 600
洞口1200x2300
1500
1100
下18
100
1300
2M01-1223(乙) 2M01-1523(乙)
2500
250 TLM0822 100 150 400
450
LC04'19
1550 1000
M0822
50 200 600
1200
上18
250
1350
LC0919
2M01-1023(甲)
450
2400
1350
800
TLM1822
2M01-1023(乙) 下26
1800
TLM1822
4400
洞口180x2300
600
600 LC04'19
1000 LC1519
M1022
4590
1700
540 60
60 90 310
90
正压送风
820
90
910
自垂百页正压送风口600x600 F1,F5,F9,F13,F17,F21,F25,F29 F33,F37,F41,F45,F49,F53,F50,F54,F58 地下部分 底距地1.500m B3,B2,B1 地上部分 底距地1.500m
820
正压送风
200
上18
远控正压送风口600x1000 底距地1.400m B3~F54（11#楼到F52）
90
1400
正压送风
2400
800
910
1200
1550
800
900
150 300
200
LC2419
1200
LM1525 2490
电气管井
250
2M01-1023(甲) 100 200 1000 350
750
250
870
950
150 300
M0822
2M01-1223(乙)
90
1800
800
0.500
1M01-0821(甲) 1500
1200
1450
200
500
1000
2M01-1023(乙)
1700
350
M0823
200
200 50
TLM0822
650 600
90
1100
90
50 200 600
1200
150 100
800
2200
管理 150300
150 100
250
LC0919
1200
250 150
850 450
LC04'19
1550
600
LC0919
120
2500
850
2500
120
1350
850
1350
120
2500
远控正压送风口350x1800 底距地0.600m B4~F54
首层核心筒平面图
80
1:50
远控正压送风口350x1800 底距地0.600m B4~F54
二至十二层核心筒平面图
1:50
DETAIL CORE PLAN
81
82
滴水
�50不锈钢横杆 �50不锈钢立杆 �30不锈钢横杆
楼6
喷涂 颜色详立面 鹰嘴
�50不锈钢横杆 �50不锈钢立杆 �30不锈钢横杆
楼6
1510
270x17=4590
1400
100 150
100 150
1450
喷涂 颜色详立面
2200
250 150
鹰嘴 干挂石材
梯井
�50不锈钢横杆 �50不锈钢立杆 �30不锈钢横杆
楼6
喷涂 颜色详立面 鹰嘴
100 280
2059
90
1750
150 100
1510
270x17=4590
1400
100 150
100 150
1450
干挂石材
150
梯井
2200
前室
会客室
2200
250
�50不锈钢横杆 �50不锈钢立杆 �30不锈钢横杆
楼6
喷涂 颜色详立面
±0.000
鹰嘴 干挂石材
100 280
2060
90
1750
150 100
1510
2430
270x8=2160
1400
100 150
100 150
1450
2200
250
150 铺地做法详园林
前室
自行车车库
梯井
1100
2295
100厚C15混凝土垫层 20厚1:3水泥砂浆保护层 SBS防水卷材3mm+4mm 20厚1:3水泥砂浆找平层 钢筋混凝土板 -3.900
100 280
2060
90
1750
150 100
1510
2160
270x9=2430
1400
100 150
100 150
1450
2200
250
150
B1
钢筋混凝土侧墙 20厚1:3水泥砂浆找平层 SBS防水卷材3mm+4mm 20厚1:3水泥砂浆保护层 120厚页岩砖
-5.550
非燃品库房 2025
梯井
1100
2100
前室
-7.200 100 280
2060
90
1750
150 100
1510
2160
270x9=2430
1400
100 150
100 150
1450
2200
250
150
2:8灰土回填
-8.850
非燃品库房
梯井
前室 1100
2100
2200
2025
-10.500
100 280
2060
90
1750
150 100
1510
-10.500
1890
270x10=2700
1400
100 150
1450
100 150
2200
-12.300
掩蔽室
前室
梯井
150
DETAIL CORE SECTION
1100
2100
1755
250
-14.100
电梯说明： 1.本单元设有三部电梯，其中 3#电梯为消防电梯； 2.电梯载重量为1000Kg，电梯梯速为3.0m/s，电梯底坑深度 3600mm； 3.电梯缓冲层高度 6200mm，电梯机房层高 4400mm； 4.电梯缓冲层高度及底坑深度根据甲方《电梯集团通用标准及档次表》中普通机房电梯选择； 5.电梯井道尺寸2300x2250(2200) ，可供甲方选用通力或日式系列电梯； 6.电梯井道施工允许误差≤ 5mm； 7.电梯机房吊钩重量为 3吨，电梯机房内“工”字钢 30b甲方负责安装； 8.本工程有关的电梯的底坑、井道、机房和门洞等图纸需经电梯供货厂家确认后方可施工。
-14.100
1-1剖面图
83 1:50
D=32钢管
1900
3100
第二段 上接第三段
100
1100
石材窗台板 用户自理
600
干挂石材 20100 150 100厚岩棉保温层
200
楼4
600
40.800
内墙3 棚2 D=32钢管
1900
3100
滴水
600
1100
石材窗台板 用户自理 楼4
100厚岩棉保温层
600
37.700
内墙3 棚2 D=32钢管
1900
3100
滴水
100
1100
石材窗台板 用户自理
600
171600
干挂石材 180 100 150 100厚岩棉保温层
250
楼4
2500
600
22.200
内墙3 棚2 D=32钢管
1900
3100
滴水
鹰嘴
100
石材窗台板 用户自理 1100
屋1
干挂石材 600
50厚岩棉保温层
167.900 (结)
180 100 150 100厚岩棉保温层
250
楼4
600
300
600
80
19.100
200
150
250
内墙3
内墙3
棚2
滴水
棚2
100
石材窗台板 用户自理 1100
20100 150 100 100厚岩棉保温层
干挂石材
楼4
600
干挂石材 600
D=32钢管
石材窗台板 用户自理
1100
100
1900
3100
1800
3100
滴水 D=32钢管
96.600
180 100 150 100厚岩棉保温层
250
楼4
600
600
9.800
内墙3 棚2
内墙3 棚2
滴水
D=32钢管
D=32钢管
1900
3100
1900
3100
滴水
石材窗台板 用户自理
干挂石材 600
楼4
100厚岩棉保温层
1100
600
1100
石材窗台板 用户自理
99.700
180 100 150 100厚岩棉保温层
250
楼4
600
600
6.700
内墙3
内墙3
棚2
滴水
棚2
滴水
第三段 下接第二段
第二段 下接第一段
D=32钢管
1900
100
石材窗台板 用户自理 1100
60
3100
第一段 上接第二段
600
干挂石材 100 150 100厚岩棉保温层
250
楼4
600
3.600
内墙3
1900
D=32钢管
600
350X11=3850
外墙2 取消保温
石材窗台板 用户自理 1100
�50x1.5不锈钢管栏杆
1100
3100
棚2
滴水
�100x2发纹不锈钢管扶手
2700
150
250
0.500
0.500
140X12=1680
4400
55厚岩棉板保温 棚5
140厚花岗岩石板踏步 M5水泥砂浆坐浆 100厚C15混凝土垫层，内配 16钢筋双向中距300 150厚5－32卵石灌M2.5混合砂浆，振捣密实 300厚粗砂或炉渣 素土夯实
-1.200
-3.900
150
250
楼8
3300
内墙4
棚4
120
50
150
250
踢4 楼8
钢筋混凝土侧墙 20厚1:3水泥砂浆找平层 SBS防水卷材3mm+4mm 20厚1:3水泥砂浆保护层 120厚页岩砖
-7.200
棚4
3600
内墙4
踢4 楼8 -14.100
84 钢筋混凝土底板 50厚细石混凝土保护层 SBS防水卷材3mm+4mm 100厚C15混凝土垫层,随打随抹
FACADE DETAIL
FACADE UNDER-CONSTRUCTION
85
1900 600
3100
第一段 上接第二段
楼3 干挂石材
19.100
100 150
250
300 20
600
100
170.600
内墙3 棚2
石材窗台板 用户自理
楼3
100厚岩棉保温层
16.000(6F) 12.900(5F) 9.800(4F) 6.700 (3F) 3.600 (2F)
100 150
2700
1900
3100
滴水
干挂石材
90
250
600
鹰嘴
100 150 150
楼3
600
棚2 600
内墙3 滴水
外墙1
1900
内墙3 厨房
704
580
100 150
250
石材窗台板 用户自理
1900
滴水
100
1F 0.500
棚2
主卧室
干挂石材
3100
3100
屋1
167.900 (结)
石材窗台板 用户自理
楼3 600
100厚岩棉保温层
100 150 150
楼3
164.800
600
55厚岩棉板保温 棚5
青色条石 100X200
散水
干挂石材
外墙1
铺地做法详园林
内墙3 厨房
3900
沥青砂浆嵌缝 150
250
风机房
踢4 楼8
50
150
100
石材窗台板 用户自理
100 150 150
楼3
250 600
120
118.300(39F) 115.200(38F) 112.100(37F) 105.900(35F) 102.800(34F) 99.700 96.600
-3.900
棚2
1900
50
3100
120
130.700(43F) 127.600(42F) 124.500(41F)
内墙5
滴水
600
-1.200
棚4 内墙4 3300
外墙1
3600
120
50
150
250
1900
68.700(23F) 65.600(22F) 62.500(21F)
踢4
100
150 50
棚6
250
掩蔽室
内墙6
600
56.300(19F) 53.200(18F) 50.100(17F) 120
棚2
滴水 3100
楼8 钢筋混凝土侧墙 20厚1:3水泥砂浆找平层 SBS防水卷材3mm+4mm 20厚1:3水泥砂浆保护层 120厚页岩砖
-7.200
内墙3 厨房
非燃品库房
81.100(27F) 78.000(26F) 74.900(25F)
43.900(15F) 40.800 37.700
石材窗台板 用户自理
外墙1 100 150
200
楼3
楼8 600
-10.500
100 150
250
171800
踢4
棚2 内墙3
FACADE DETAIL
厨房
600
100
34.600 31.500(11F) 28.400 25.300 (9F) 22.200(8F)
石材窗台板 用户自理
外墙1
楼3
600
钢筋混凝土底板 50厚细石混凝土保护层 SBS防水卷材3mm+4mm 100厚C15混凝土垫层,随打随抹
1900
3100
滴水
100 150
250
棚2 内墙3 厨房
滴水
86
第二段 下接第一段
FACADE FINISHED
87
DESIGN
RESEARCH
BUILDING SYSTEM REPRESENTATION
DRAWINGS 2006-2010
89
2007 CHARCOAL | SIZE: A3
2006 INK | SIZE: A4
90
2007 PENCIL | SIZE: A3
2011 SIENA PIAZZA DEL CAMPO
2011 VIGEVANO
2011 VILLA EMO 2011 VIGEVANO
91
2006 PENCIL | SIZE: A3 92
2011 SAN LORENZO
93
94
WANJING XIAO e: waxiao@syr.edu p:315-4501617