RUSSIAN POLICE AND INTELLIGENCE DISAGREE OVER WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO NAVALNY

before on a similarly negative attitude to forging better ties with Washington when either Biden is newly elected or Trump wins another term in office. However, it is worth recalling a part of the interview where Naryshkin touched upon U.S. election mechanisms. What is visible is that Russia – while waging its information warfare campaign – has the intention of using the U.S. political turmoil to attack the core of American democracy. If Naryshkin argues that mail-in ballots might cause delays in the results, thus giving the ground to question them and keep discrepancies resonate within American society, it is the fact that Russian intelligence services will focus on this. To do so, they will mobilize their agents of influence or disseminate proper content on social media channels. What is striking is Naryshkin’s verbal statement about “the disease of the American state and society.” His words clearly confirm the goals of Russian policy toward the U.S. vote. Moscow’s mission is to destabilize the American state as long as it is possible to cripple the legitimacy of the presidential winner once finally elected. A new U.S. leader holding a doubtful mandate – especially in the eyes of the adverse political camp – is the dream scenario for the Kremlin. It has always been Moscow’s strategic aim to make the U.S. establishment focus more on its domestic affairs rather than foreign ones. This time no champagne corks popped – nor they will – in Moscow as they might have in 2016 after Trump won the White House. The Kremlin has adopted a far more cautious stance and is pleased to get new updates from Washington. If it takes days – or even weeks – to elect the new U.S. president, with courts being involved in the whole process, Moscow will gain enough time to put its plans into practice in such hotbeds as Belarus, the Caucasus, and Syria.

10 November 2020 RUSSIAN POLICE AND INTELLIGENCE DISAGREE OVER WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO NAVALNY

Russian officials deliver somewhat contradictory statements about reasons for the sudden health crisis of Alexey Navalny. Specialized laboratories in the West determined that the Russian opposition figure was poisoned with a substance of the Novichok group. Moscow denies having been behind the crime yet is unable to precise a coherent version of events. On the same day when the chief of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), Sergey Naryshkin, said that Western intelligence agencies had staged a provocation to assassinate the Russian opposition activist, law enforcement agencies in Siberia admitted that Navalny’s falling ill might have been caused by the exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis.

SOURCE: KREMLIN.RU

Siberian transport police announced on November 6 that Navalny had not fallen victim to the poisoning back in August. Investigators carried out a set of measures, during which over 210 people have been questioned and over 60 forensic analyses have been appointed, police officers informed. In consequence, they suggested that Navalny fell ill because of metabolic problems and chronic pancreatitis. Russia’s prosecutor general stated on the same that it had not received any reply from Germany to its legal assistance and information on a chemical agent “allegedly discovered in Germany.” However, still on November 6, the head of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service, Sergey Naryshkin, suggested that Western services had plotted to poison Navalny. Thus, Naryshkin admitted that the opposition had been affected by a toxic agent, a claim that the country’s Interior Ministry dismissed. The intelligence chief maintained that the attempted poisoning of Navalny was aimed at reviving the withered protest movement in Russia, possibly that in Khabarovsk. Speaking to the Russian news agency RIA Novosti, Russia’s chief spy claimed that in 2019 “members of special services met in a NATO country” to “use an opposition leader as a sacred sacrifice.” Naryshkin yet noted he had no direct evidence of Western countries masterminding Navalny’s attempted poisoning. The blogger responded to these revelations himself on the same day. “It is funny that they, in one day, have Naryshkin say I was poisoned by NATO states, and the Interior Ministry that says there was no poisoning,” he said. Contradictory statements from Russian officials show two things. First of all, they do not have clean hands in this respect. Secondly, there are some shortcomings in how different state structures – also power ones – coordinate their duties, a poor proof of how Putin’s regime is ready to tackle new challenges.