MA DOT Stone's Bridge Inspection by Wayland Historical Commission

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2-DIST

B.I.N.

7UP

STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT 8.-STRUCTURE NO.

BR. DEPT. NO.

W-11-006=F-07-012

ROUTINE ARCH & SPECIAL MEMBER INSPECTION

CITY/TOWN

PAGE

11-Kilo. POINT

41-STATUS

90-ROUTINE INSP. DATE

WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

000.000

K:CLOSED

07-FACILITY CARRIED

MEMORIAL NAME/LOCAL NAME

27-YR BUILT

106-YR REBUILT YR REHAB'D (NON 106)

HWY STNEBRDGE RD

Stone's Bridge

06-FEATURES INTERSECTED

26-FUNCTIONAL CLASS

1857

WATER SUDBURY RIVER

Urban Local 22-OWNER

21-MAINTAINER

811 : Masonry Arch - Deck

Town Agency

107-DECK TYPE

WEATHER

TEMP. (air)

Town Agency

Sunny

ITEM 58

DECK

DEF

1. Wearing surface

2. Deck Condition

3. Spandrel Fill

S-A

4. Curbs

5. Median

TEAM LEADER

L. A. Gauthier

D. SMITH

21째C

ITEM 60

SUPERSTRUCTURE

DEF

1. Arch/Arch Ring

S-A

2. Keystone Area

S-A

a. Pedestals

3. Stringers

c. Backwalls

4. Floorbeams

5. Spandrel Walls

S-A

6. Sidewalks

6. Spring Lines

g. Pointing

7. Parapets

7. Diaphragms/Cross Frames

8. Railing

S-A

8. Conn Plt's, Gussets & Angles N

h. Footings i. Piles

b. Bridge Seats

e. Wingwalls f. Slope Paving/Rip-Rap

j. Scour

9. Pin & Hangers

10. Drainage System

10.Masonry Joints

S-A

11. Lighting Standards

11. Rivets & Bolts

k. Settlement l. m.

12. Utilities

12.Welds

13. Deck Joints

13.Deformation/Flattening

S-A

c. Columns

14.

14.Member Alignment

S-A

15.

15.Paint/Coating

16.

(In millimeters)

APPROACHES

DEF

None ( X )

Minor ( ) Moderate (

LOAD DEFLECTION:

b. Appr. Roadway Settlement

None ( X )

c. Appr. Sidewalk Settlement

LOAD VIBRATION:

None ( X )

(Attached to bridge)

(Y/N)

h. Scour i. Settlement j. k.

) Severe (

)

) Severe (

N N N 6 3 N N N N N 3 N N

N N N N N N N N N N N

N N N 3 N X N N N N N

N N N N N

)

3 M-P S-P S-A -

3 S-A -

a. Pile Caps c. Diagonal Bracing d. Horizontal Bracing e. Fasteners

) Severe (

Any Fracture Critical Member: (Y/N)

3. 3. Pile Pile Bents Bents b. Piles

Please explain

Minor ( ) Moderate (

e. Pointing g. Piles

Please explain

Minor ( ) Moderate (

d. Stems/Webs/Pierwalls f. Footing

COLLISION DAMAGE: Please explain

a. Appr. pavement condition

OVERHEAD SIGNS

b. Caps

Year Painted

N N N N N N N N N N N N N

2. 2. Piers Piers or or Bents Bents a. Pedestals

DEF Dive Cur

d. Breastwalls

9. Anti Missile Fence

SUBSTRUCTURE 1. Abutments

CURB REVEAL

0000

TEAM MEMBERS

ITEM 59

1957

DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER M. Azizi

43-STRUCTURE TYPE

N : Not applicable

MAY 14, 2015

UNDERMINING (Y/N)

If YES please explain

COLLISION DAMAGE: None ( X ) Minor ( ) Moderate (

) Severe (

)

DEF

a. Condition of Welds

b. Condition of Bolts

c. Condition of Signs

X=UNKNOWN RTN(1)7-96

I-60 (Dive Report):

Any Cracks:

(Y/N)

N=NOT APPLICABLE

93B-U/W (DIVE) Insp

H=HIDDEN/INACCESSIBLE

I-60 (This Report):

00/00/00

R=REMOVED

PAGE CITY/TOWN

B.I.N.

WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

7UP

ITEM 61 CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

ITEM 36

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

TRAFFIC SAFETY 0 0 N N

A. Bridge Railing B. Transitions

Dive Cur

C. Approach Guardrail

DEF

1. Channel Scour

D. Approach Guardrail Ends

2. Embankment Erosion

3. Debris

S-A

4. Vegetation

5. Utilities

6. Rip-Rap/Slope Protection

7. Aggradation 8. Fender System

WEIGHT POSTING

3S2

Single

Actual Posting

Recommended Posting

Waived Date:

S-A

Signs In Place (Y=Yes,N=No, NR=NotRequired) Legibility/ Visibility

) Moderate (

ITEM 61 (Dive Report):

) Low (

) None (

ITEM 61 (This Report):

RATING

0 0 At bridge N S

N N N Y N N N N N N

Other:

meter

0 0

PLANS (V.C.R.)

Advance N S

12 (Y/N):

(Y/N):

TAPE#: List of field tests performed:

Request for Rating or Rerating (Y/N):

00/00/00

Date:

Traffic Control RR Flagger Police

S in

(To be filled out by DBIE)

Rating Report (Y/N):

Other Advance E W

N ft

Signs In Place (Y=Yes,N=No, NR=Not Required) Legibility/ Visibility

00/00/00

93b-U/W INSP. DATE:

Posted Clearance

)

Boat Waders Inspector 50 Rigging Staging

N N N Y N N N N N N

TOTAL HOURS

Actual Field Measurement

STREAM FLOW VELOCITY:

Lift Bucket Ladder

00/00/00

EJDMT Date:

At bridge E W

(Y/N/P) Needed Used

S-A S-A -

Not Applicable

) High (

3 3 N N

Not Applicable

CLEARANCE POSTING

Tidal (

DEF

00/00/00

MAY 14, 2015

ACCESSIBILITY COND

INSPECTION DATE

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO 36

If YES please give priority:

HIGH (

) MEDIUM (

)

LOW (

)

REASON:

Inspection data at time of existing rating I 58: - I 59: - I 60: - Date : 00/00/00

CONDITION RATING GUIDE CONDITION

CODE

(For Items 58, 59, 60 and 61)

DEFECTS

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT

Excellent condition.

VERY GOOD

No problem noted.

GOOD

Some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY

Structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR

All primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.

POOR

Advance section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.

SERIOUS

Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL

Advance deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken.

"IMMINENT" FAILURE

Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stablility. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put it back in light service.

FAILED

Out of service - beyond corrective action.

DEFICIENCY REPORTING GUIDE DEFICIENCY:

A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.

CATEGORIES OF DEFICIENCIES: M= Minor Deficiency - Deficiencies which are minor in nature, generally do not impact the structural integrity of the bridge and could easily be repaired. Examples include but are not limited to: Spalled concrete, Minor pot holes, Minor corrosion of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged drainage, etc.

S= Severe/Major Deficiency -

Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel with measurable loss of section, etc.

C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency -

A deficiency in a structural element of a bridge that poses an extreme unsafe condition due to the failure or imminent failure of the element which will affect the structural integrity of the bridge. A deficiency in a component or element of a bridge that poses an extreme hazard or unsafe condition to the public, but does not impair the structural integrity of the bridge. Examples include but are not limited to: Loose concrete hanging down over traffic or pedestrians, A hole in a sidewalk that may cause injuries to pedestrians, Missing section of bridge railing, etc.

URGENCY OF REPAIR: I = ImmediateA = ASAPP = PrioritizeRTB(2)04-07

[Inspector(s) immediately contact District Bridge Inspection Engineer (DBIE) to report the Deficiency and to receive further instruction from him/her]. [Action/Repair should be initiated by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) upon receipt of the Inspection Report]. [Shall be prioritized by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) and repairs made when funds and/or manpower is available].

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE 2-DIST

B.I.N.

STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT

BR. DEPT. NO.

7UP

ROUTINE ARCH & SPECIAL MEMBER INSPECTION

W-11-006=F-07-012

03 CITY/TOWN

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

11-Kilo. POINT

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

07-FACILITY CARRIED

Stone's Bridge

06-FEATURES INTERSECTED

26-FUNCTIONAL CLASS

WATER SUDBURY RIVER

Urban Local

43-STRUCTURE TYPE

22-OWNER

21-MAINTAINER

107-DECK TYPE

WEATHER

TEMP. (air)

N : Not applicable

Sunny

WEIGHT POSTING

Not Applicable H

3S2

Single

Actual Posting

Recommended Posting

Waived Date:

00/00/00

EJDMT Date:

00/00/00

Signs In Place (Y=Yes,N=No, NR=Not Required) Legibility/ Visibility

Inspection data at time of existing rating I 59: - I 60: - I 62: Date : 00/00/00

0000 M. Azizi

TEAM MEMBERS

D. SMITH At bridge

Advance

PLANS

(Y/N):

(V.C.R.)

(Y/N):

TAPE#:

Request for Rating or Rerating (Y/N):

----

Date:

1957

TEAM LEADER L. A. Gauthier

RATING Rating Report (Y/N):

May 14, 2015

106-YR REBUILT *YR REHAB'D (NON 106)

1857

21째C

May 14, 2015

27-YR BUILT

DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER

Town Agency Town Agency

811 : Masonry Arch - Deck

90-ROUTINE INSP. DATE 93*-SPEC. MEMB. INSP. DATE

000.000

MEMORIAL NAME/LOCAL NAME

HWY STNEBRDGE RD

I 58: -

OF 16

If YES please give priority:

HIGH (

)

MEDIUM (

) LOW (

)

REASON:

SPECIAL MEMBER(S): CRACK

MEMBER A B C D E

(Y/N):

Item 58.3 Spandrel Fill Item 59.1 - Arch/ Arch Ring Item 59.2 Keystone Area Item 59.5 Spandrel Walls Item 59.10 Masonry Joints

N N N N N

WELD'S CONDITION

LOCATION OF CORROSION, SECTION LOSS (%), CRACKS, COLLISION DAMAGE, STRESS CONCENTRATION, ETC.

(0-9)

CONDITION PREVIOUS

PRESENT

(0-9)

See remarks in comments section. See remarks in comments section. See item 59.1 for comments. See remarks in comments section. See remarks in comments section.

INV. RATING OF MEMBER FROM RATING ANALYSIS H-20

Deficiencies

3S2

Not Rated

S-A

Not Rated

S-A

Not Rated

S-A

Not Rated

S-A

Not Rated

S-A

I-58

I-59

I-60

I-62

(Overall Previous Condition)

(Overall Current Condition)

List of field tests performed:

DEFICIENCY:

A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.

holes, Minor corrosion of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged drainage, etc. Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel with measurable loss of section, etc.

S= Severe/Major Deficiency -

C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency -

URGENCY OF REPAIR: I = ImmediateA = ASAPP = Prioritize-

X=UNKNOWN F.C.(1)7-96

N=NOT APPLICABLE

H=HIDDEN/INACCESSIBLE

R=REMOVED

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

INSPECTION DATE

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

MAY 14, 2015

SPECIAL MEMBER(S): MEMBER

60.1. Abutments F e.Wingwalls

CRACK

(Y/N):

60.2. Piers or Bents

G d.Stems/Webs/Pierwalls

RTB(2)7-96

WELD'S CONDITION

LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF DAMAGE

(0-9)

See remarks in comments section. See remarks in comments section.

CONDITION PREVIOUS

PRESENT

(0-9)

INV. RATING OF MEMBER FROM RATING ANALYSIS Deficiencies

H-20

3S2

Not Rated

S-P

Not Rated

S-A

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

REMARKS BRIDGE ORIENTATION From the compass the abandoned Stonebridge Road ran West and East, and the (relocated to the West) Sudbury River flows from South to North. There are 4 spans and 3 piers numbered from the West to the east GENERAL REMARKS NOTE: Stonebridge Road over the Sudbury River is a town line structure, but the majority of the existing structure lies within the Town of Wayland. All access to the structure is from The Town of Wayland side. Recorded interest and maintenance is from the Town of Wayland. Thus, in the interest of accurate coding, the NBI documentation recording has been reversed from normal alpha-numeric superiority, placing the primary record in the Town of Wayland and the secondary record in the Town of Framingham. The roadway in Framingham was originally Potter Road. The R.O.W. has been discontinued and sold to private parties (now houses) NOTE: The access to the structure has been closed by the Town. The structure is designated as a CLO (closed to all), but there is a 2 ft. wide gap in the rail system allowing easy pedestrian access. The Sign consists of Bridge Closed, No Trespassing, Bridge Unsafe. See photo 1. ITEM 58 - DECK Item 58.3 - Spandrel Fill There are voids in the tops of the arches up to 24 inches deep. The are voids in the spandrel walls up to 36 inches deep. There are small areas where daylight is viable through the pier walls. See photo 2. Item 58.8 - Railing The bridge rail system consists of 3- split rail 4X4 (nominal) horizontals spaced 10 ft. on center, extending from the East abutment to the West abutment/wall and back to the East abutment. The verticals consist of 5 in. (nominal) timber posts. The overall condition is very poor with some sections completely missing. See photo 3. ITEM 59 - SUPERSTRUCTURE Item 59.1 - Arch/Arch Ring General comments: There is extensive shifting, deformation, settleing and voids throughout the structure. Some settlement cracks were evident. Penetrations up to 36 in. were common throughout the arches up to the 1/3 points, and penetrations up to 24 inches, into the fill, were common along the top 1/3. Span #1 is 13ft. 8 in. and is located at the Westerly end of the structure. The span has some minor flattening and rotation to the Northwest corner, with joint gaps up to 2 in. wide. See photo 4. Span #2 is 14ft. 1 inch. The South end has severe deformation toward the Easterly end (See photo 5), resulting in keystone unhinging (See photo 6), and minor rotation. Span #3 is 13 ft. 10 in. The Westerly side of the arch ring appears to have 2/3 of the stonework rotated Southerly with gaps up to 6 inches wide (See photo 7) with some minor crushing and moderate deformation at the Southeast corner. Span #4 is 13 ft. 8 in. and is located at the Easterly end of the structure. There is a 2 inch gap caused by settlement, and deformations throughout. See photo 8.

REM.(2)7-96

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

REMARKS Item 59.2 - Keystone Area See item 59.1 for comments. Item 59.5 - Spandrel Walls There is settlement, bulging, missing stones, and voids through out spandrel walls. Voids in the Northeast spandrel wall. See photo 9. The top of the Northwest end is rotating out. See photo 10. A stone fell out of the top of the Northwest corner. See photo 11. There are voids at the base of the Southwest corner. See photo 12. The wall is bulging at pier #1. See photo 13. Item 59.10 - Masonry Joints All masonry joints are dry set. See 59.1 and 59.5 for comments Item 59.13 - Deformation/Flattening See item 59.1 and 59,5 for comments. Item 59.14 - Member Alignment See item 59.1 and 59,5 for comments. ITEM 60 - SUBSTRUCTURE Item 60.1 - Abutments Item 60.1.d - Breastwalls The Westerly abutment/wall was placed in 1957 and consists of a reinforced concrete wall with stone facade. See photo 14. There are small areas of reinforced concrete exposed. Item 60.1.e - Wingwalls Wingwalls exist along the Easterly side only. Thee is a void at the base of the Northerly wing. See photo 15. Item 60.1.g - Pointing The entire structure is dry set. Item 60.1.k - Settlement There is considerable settlement visible from the mudline up. Item 60.2 - Piers or Bents Item 60.2.d - Stems/Webs/Pierwalls There are voids in the pierwall completely through, up to 3 ft. above waterline. See photo 2. Item 60.2.e - Pointing The entire structure is dry set. ITEM 61 - CHANNEL AND CHANNEL PROTECTION Item 61.3 - Debris There is extensive debris and vegetation against the upstream barrels 4 - 2. Barrel #1 (West end) is open and flowing. See photo 16. Item 61.7 - Aggradation The relocated Sudbury River (West) is filling in along the West bank. See photos 17 & 18.

REM.(2)7-96

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

MAY 14, 2015

TRAFFIC SAFETY Item 36a - Bridge Railing See Item 58.8 for comments. Item 36b - Transitions Exist on the East approach only. See item 58.8 for comments and photos.

REM.(2)7-96

INSPECTION DATE

REMARKS

Photo Log Photo 1 : Photo 2 : Photo 3 : Photo 4 : Photo 5 : Photo 6 : Photo 7 : Photo 8 : Photo 9 : Photo 10 : Photo 11 : Photo 12 : Photo 13 : Photo 14 : Photo 15 : Photo 16 : Photo 17 : Photo 18 :

Signs and barriers closing structure. Example of light through the pierwall (lower right). Example of collapsed rail system. Minor flattening of Span #1 arch. Deformation and flattening of the arch in span #2. Span #2 keystone unhinged, South end. Span #3 West end of the arch ring-2/3 is shifting to the South, with gaps up to 6 inches. Gap in the stonework, 2 inches wide in Span #4. Voids in the base of the Northeast spandrel wall. Rotation to the top of the spandrel wall, Northwest corner Missing stone at the spandrel wall abutment/end wall interface. Stonework missing to the base of the spandrel wall, Southwest corner. Spandrel wall bulging at pier #1. Westerly abutment/wall. Void at the base of the Northeast wingwall. Extensive debris in front of most barrells. Downstream view of relocated channel filling in. Upstream view of channel filling in.

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 1:

Signs and barriers closing structure.

Photo 2:

Example of light through the pierwall (lower right).

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 3:

Example of collapsed rail system.

Photo 4:

Minor flattening of Span #1 arch.

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 5:

Deformation and flattening of the arch in span #2.

Photo 6:

Span #2 keystone unhinged, South end.

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 7:

Span #3 West end of the arch ring-2/3 is shifting to the South, with gaps up to 6 inches.

Photo 8:

Gap in the stonework, 2 inches wide in Span #4.

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 9:

Voids in the base of the Northeast spandrel wall.

Photo 10:

Rotation to the top of the spandrel wall, Northwest corner

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 11:

Missing stone at the spandrel wall abutment/end wall interface.

Photo 12:

Stonework missing to the base of the spandrel wall, Southwest corner.

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 13:

Spandrel wall bulging at pier #1.

Photo 14:

Westerly abutment/wall.

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 15:

Void at the base of the Northeast wingwall.

Photo 16:

Extensive debris in front of most barrells.

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015

PAGE CITY/TOWN WAYLAND=FRAMINGHAM

B.I.N.

7UP

BR. DEPT. NO. W-11-006=F-07-012

8.-STRUCTURE NO.

W11006-7UP-MUN-CLO

PHOTOS

REM.(2)7-96

Photo 17:

Downstream view of relocated channel filling in.

Photo 18:

Upstream view of channel filling in.

INSPECTION DATE

MAY 14, 2015