1 minute read
Ludicrous concoctions, conflict cannot be allowed to undermine GECOM’s functions
Dear Editor,
In an unjustified attack on Justice (retired) Claudette Singh, Chairperson of the Guyana Election Commission (GECOM), Commissioner Vincent Alexander recently published an outburst deserving of full condemnation. His rants served only to reinforce the litany of constitutional and other failures that he is now known to be associated with, particularly the continuous undermining role of the Commission of his employ.
Advertisement
The matter relates to the Commission’s consideration and approval of a petition for the temporary secondment of the GECOM
IT Manager to the Operations Department of the Commission’s Secretariat. In this respect, Alexander seems to be objecting to the particular staff rendering interim assistance to the Chief Elections Officer (CEO) with the regularisation of some day–to–day organisational work, and this was indeed petty and infantile.
Alexander is fully aware that Local Government Elections are overdue, and it is imperative that GECOM put all systems in place to hold LGEs immediately. It is, however, not surprising that he sought to prematurely throw another tantrum of convenience targeted at slowing down the GECOM hosting of the LGEs.
These intermittent acts of defiance run contrary to the level of objectivity required of the Commission concerning its function, defined under the spirit and intent of Article 162 of our Constitution. In particular, Section 162 (1) (b) states: “The Commission – shall issue such instructions and take such action as appear to it necessary or expedient to ensure impartiality, fairness, and compliance with the provisions of this Constitution or of any Act of Parliament on the part of persons exercising powers or performing duties connected with or relating to the matters aforesaid.”
There appears to be only very little consideration, if any, of the meaning of impartiality, fairness, and expedient in the dictionary of Alexander. He was conveniently and conflictingly silent when the brutal assault of certain persons was launched on the true results of the March 2020 elections results, disenfranchising the votes of thousands of electors. On numerous occasions, when a certain senior staff usurped the authority of the Commission in an attempt to execute heinous acts against our nation, he seemingly lost his voice.
It would be recalled that when the shoes were on the other foot, Alexander hypocritically penned a letter accusing the then PPPC commissioners of grandstanding. Concerning “the preparedness of GECOM for the local government elections,” he stated, “I will lend my effort to GECOM being prepared and allow history to determine the correctness of the Benn, Shadick and Gunraj contention.” This situation allows one to pose questions about why his concerns have now changed.