ZGP REAL ESTATE
2017-2018
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF BUILDING DEVELOPEMNT
- 88 ARKANSAS
Residential Condo
- 525 HARRISON
Residential Condo
- 1601 MISSION
Mix use( residential and retail)
- 1135 7TH STREET
Mix use( residential and retail)
88 ARKANSAS
525 HARRISON
Location: San Francisco
Location: San Francisco
Type: Residential Condo
Type: Residential Condo
Unit #: 127
Unit #: 203
Cost: 91 Million
Cost: 162 Million
Status: Under Construction
Status: Design phase
Estimated Delivery: Q4 2019
Estimated Delivery: Q4 2020
1601 MISSION
1135 7TH ST.
Location: San Francisco
Location: Los Angeles
Type: Mix use( residential and retail)
Type: Mix use( residential and retail)
Unit #: 220
Unit #: 241
Commercial: 12,600 sf
Commercial: 17,300 sf
Cost: 168 Million
Cost: 141 Million
Status: Design phase
Status: Design phase
Estimated Delivery: Q3 2021
Estimated Delivery: Q4 2021
nARCHITECTS
2015-2017
ARCHITECTURE DESIGN
- A/D/O - AUBURN CULTURAL CENTER
Coworking design workplace
Cultural center
- CARMEL PLACE
Micro unit prefab residential tower
- HK SYL TOWER
30 stoires luxury residential tower
- POLYCENTRIC PAVILLION - SHANGHAI LIBRARY
Performance pavillion
Information center library
SKYLIGHT
MINI - A/D/O
Amplifying the skylight’s role of introducing daylight and exterior views into interior
Occupying a former warehouse, the 23,000 sf transformation provides a new
space, a periscope-skylight at A/D/O offers views otherwise impossible to perceive.
space open to the general public, combining spaces for events and exhibitions,
Mirrors on the periscope’s underside reflect distant views of Manhattan and Brooklyn,
design education, free communal workspace, a fabrication lab, a restaurant,
joining them into a single unfamiliar skyline.
and a design shop. A central feature of the project is a large kaleidoscopic periscope that joins the Brooklyn and Manhattan skylines into a single horizon.
A/D/O
A/D/O
A/D/O A/D A/ A //D D/O D/O /O
COURTYARD
AUBURN CULTURAL CENTER
The Courtyard as an sight frame, circulation connector, incubate activities.
The scheme is characterized by cutting courtyard that connect each vision frame to the historical preservation building around and the city beyond, also it justifies the rotation of the 3 inner volumes and 3 outer volumes to generate dynamic interior exhibition spaces.
Auburn Cultural Center
Auburn Cultural Center
Auburn Cultural Center
TOWER
CARMEL PLACE
Rather than inscribing a new tower within a city’s urban context, Carmel Place is
Carmel Place is the city’s first micro-unit apartment building. The building’s 55
conceived as a microcosm of a city skyline. The tower here is considered an architectural
studio apartments, which range from 260-360sf, are luminous and efficient, with
rather than urban element, multiplied and denisifed as a new paradigm for micro living.
a feeling of spaciousness due to their 9’-8” ceiling heights, 8’ tall windows, Juliet balconies and overhead storage.
Carmel Place
Carmel Place
Carmel Place
Carmel Place
Carmel Place
FLOOR
HONGKONG SYL TOWER
The floor functions as an object (horizontal, structural plane), designates
HONG KONG SYL TOWER in HONG KONG China establishes a vertically
location (nth floor), and divides space vertically into occupiable space.
diminishing floor-to-floor height to provide a range of housing types, and equitable compensation of interior space in exchange for views.
Hong Kong Tower
Hong Kong Kon Tower
Hong Kong Tower
Hong Kong Tower
Terracottaa cladding, see 22/A-500 Mtl. rope for climbing plants anchored to top and bbottom angles Mtl. flashing flashin Light fixture mounted on angle anchored to co concrete curb Mtl. cladding Mtl. cladding attachment system Planter drain pipe Air water barrier Concrete planter Concrete curb
555 355
150
50
Cut terracotta acotta as req'd
Mtl. cap Glass guardrail on alum. shoe Light fixture, see lighting drawings Mtl. fascia
450
400
Decking
150
10
Terracotta cladding
Align
AXON: TYP. INT. CORNER @ NICHE 1:10
11
AXON: TYP. CORNER TYPE 1/2 1:10
Concrete curb Terracotta cladding
Typ. custom ustom corner terracott terracotta panel
10
Stone coping 1150
80
05
DTL. SECTION: TYP. PLANTER W/ TERRACOTTA 1:10
03
DTL. SECTION: TYP. REST. TERRACE 1:10
650
Light post
Terracotta cladding Terracotta cladding @ soffit
Lighting support
Mtl. fascia 300
Flat terracotta panel
Air / water barrier Block wall Interior finish
Typ. 4
196
Terracotta panel Terracotta mtl. clip Mtl. vertical supports anchored to Z-girts Z-girts anchored to block wall
Typ. Mtl. edge
Custom terracotta corner piece type 1
196
Mtl. angle anchored to block wall Mtl. rope for climbing plants anchored to top and bottom angles
Scalloped terracotta panel
DTL. PLAN: TYP. CUSTOM CORNER TYPE 1 1:10
04
SECTION DTL: TYP. TERRACOTTA ASSEMBLY 1:10
1:10
196
5 deg.
Flashing Honed dark granite Sealant and backer rod Concrete curb
08
25 25 25
Varies, min. 100
DTL. PLAN: TYP. CUSTOM CORNER TYPE 2 1:10
DTL. SECTION: TYP. NICHE W/ GLAZING
196
Custom terracotta corner piece type 2
07
07
DTL. SECTION: TYP. TERRACOTTA @ GRADE 1:10
450
03
1300
Mtl. storefront w/ clear glazing
Mtl. storefront w/ clear glazing Mtl. angle to support climbing plants Light fixture
11
DTL. SECTION: TYP. PLANTER W/ GLAZING 1:10
12
DTL. SECTION: CLUBHOUSE TERRACE 1:10
Barrel Vault
Groin Vault
Skewed Barrel Vault
Intersecting Vaults
Morphed Vault
VAULT
Adjacent Vaults
Rib Vault
Split Vault
Reverse Split Vault
POLYCENTRIC PAVILION
Liberated from their heavy masonry antecedents, the bamboo vaults in Forest Pavilion
Polycentric Pavilion is conceived of as both an area for passive
and aluminum vaults in Polycentric Pavilion for the Milan Triennale explore deviations from
lounging and a model for a more active and multi-directional theater.
original types. Made possible by their thin-ness, the vaults now connect in continuous,
The varying relationship between the vaults, the deck, and the void
unfolding spatial networks, generating new possibilities for performances within them.
allows performers and audience to appropriate decking as stage or seating, resulting in multiple performance configurations.
Fan Vault
Two to One Vault
Merged Vaults
Polycentric Pavilion, XXI Milan Triennale
Polycentric Pavilion, XXI Milan Triennale
GARDEN
SHANGHAI LIBRARY
The floor functions as an object (horizontal, structural plane), designates
The scheme is characterized by open floors that connect library activities to nature and
location (nth floor), and divides space vertically into occupiable space.
the city beyond, and compact floors that store a wide range of information formats and supporting functions. Supported by the compact levels below – both structurally and programmatically - these open floors are imagined as the city’s Patio, Living Room, Atelier and Study: a Library as Home. Shanghai Library East Hall
Shanghai Library East Hall
Shanghai Library East Hall
ࡴ Terracotta printing blocks T
كי戳வ Glazed exterior
ୌޗك戳வ Natural unglazed interior
Shanghai Library East Hall
TRIBECA ASSOCIATES FEASIBILITY STUDY - 320 W 31 STREET
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Zoning & Code considerations - Z&C constraints - Bulk vs FAR constraints - Density constraints + Unit distribution studies - Core & corridor constraints - Residential unit considerations 2. Micro Unit Studies 3. Layout Studies 4. Massing Studies Appendix I: Carmel Place - Micro units
2
1. ZONING & CODE CONSIDERATIONS
3
ZONING & CODE CONSTRAINTS C6-3X
*Information and diagrams in this section are extracted from the Zoning Handbook, New York City Department of City Planning.
R9X
C6 districts permit a wide range of high-bulk commercial uses requiring a central location. Most C6 districts are in Manhattan, Downtown Brooklyn and Downtown Jamaica; a C6-3D district is mapped in the Civic Center area of the Bronx. Corporate headquarters, large hotels, department stores and entertainment facilities in high-rise mixed buildings are permitted in C6 districts.
R9X contextual districts (and C1-8X, C2-7X and C6-3X districts with an R9X residential district equivalent), mapped only in Manhattan, are governed by Quality Housing regulations. With a floor area ratio (FAR) and height limit substantially higher than other R9 districts, R9X regulations produce the taller, bulkier 16- to 18-story apartment buildings characteristic of Chelsea and Murray Hill in Manhattan.
C6-1, C6-2 and most C6-3 districts, typically mapped in areas outside central business cores, such as the Lower East Side and Chelsea, have a commercial floor area ratio (FAR) of 6.0; the C6-3D district has an FAR of 9.0. C6-4 through C6-9 districts, typically mapped within the city’s major business districts, have a maximum FAR of 10.0 or 15.0, exclusive of any applicable bonus. Floor area may be increased by a bonus for a public plaza or Inclusionary Housing.
The FAR in R9X districts is 9.0. On a wide street, the base height of a new building must be 105 to 120 feet with a 10 foot setback before rising to a maximum height of 170 feet. On a wide street, the street wall must extend along the entire width of the zoning lot and at least 70% of the street wall must be within eight feet of the street line. On a narrow street, the base height must be 60 to 120 feet with a 15-foot setback before rising to a maximum height of 160 feet.
C6-2A, C6-3A, C6-3X and C6-4A are contextual districts with maximum building heights. C6-3D and C6-4X districts allow towers above a building base; special rules determine the tower’s height and articulation. All other C6 districts allow towers to penetrate a sky exposure plane and do not require a contextual base.
Off-street parking is not required for any development in the Manhattan Core. Elsewhere, parking is required for 40% of the dwelling units
C6 districts are widely mapped within special districts. C6-4.5, C6-5.5, C6-6.5 and C6-7T districts are mapped only within the Special Midtown District and have unique floor area ratios and bonus rules. C6-1G, C6-2G, C6-2M and C6-4M districts are mapped in Chinatown and Chelsea and in the Special Garment Center District, and have rules for the conversion of non-residential space to residential use. C6 districts are well served by mass transit, and off-street parking is generally not required, except within the C6-3D district.
4
ZONING & CODE CONSTRAINTS 320 W 31st Street
C6-3X / R9X
25,922 sf
FAR: 9.0
ZSF 233,298 sf
Address
320 West 31st Street, Interior lot
Lot Area
25,922 SF (Lot Dimension: 262.5’ x 98.75’)
Zoning
C6-3X (R9X Equivalent - Quality Housing) Special Zoning District Overlay N/A Landmarks Preservation District N/A NYC designated Landmarks N/A
Max. FAR
6 (Only Commercial Uses) 9 (Community Facility or Both Community Facility and Commercial Uses) 9 (Residential Uses - Quality Housing)
C6-3X
Max. Permitted Floor Area 25,922 SF x 9 = 233,298 SF (Residential, Community Facility, or Community Facility + Commercial Uses) 25,922 SF x 6 = 155,532 SF (Commercial Uses) Lot Coverage
100% (Ground floor - Commercial)
Base Height
60’-120’ (min/max)
Building Height
160’ (max)
Front Setback
15’ (narrow street)
70% (Interior lot - Residential)
Rear Setback
Not required (ZQA)
Rear yard
30’ min. (not higher than 23’ above curb level), Residential
Parking
Not required
5
BULK VS FAR CONSTRAINTS 320 W 31st Street
C6-3X / R9X
25,922 sf
FAR: 9.3
ZSF 241,550 sf
MAXIMUMIZATION OF BULK FAR: 9.3 MAXIMUM FAR ALLOWED FAR: 9.0 10’-0” (Typ.)
HYPOTHETICAL FAR (MAXIMIZATION OF BULK) Ground floor
15’-0” Setback (from street wall @ narrow street)
10’-0” (Typ.)
20’-0” GF (23’-0” max.) 160’-0” max.
25,870 SF (Lot Dimension: 262.5’ x 98.75’)
Cellar
25,870 SF
2nd-11th FL
18,030 SF (x10)
12th-15th FL
14,095 SF (x4) - Not including dormers*
TOTAL GSF
262,550 SF
TOTAL ZSF
241,550 SF**
FAR
9.3 / 9.5 (with dormers)
EXCESS
7,550 SF /12,685 SF with dormers***
*Allowed dormers= 5,135 SF (not illustrated on diagram, not necessary to meet max. FAR) **Assuming 8% QH/mechanical/facade improvement deduction 60’-0”/120’-0” (min./max.)
***To be subtracted from max. bulk to meet FAR: 9.0
Maximized bulk (not including dormers) 7,550 SF to be subtracted from bulk to meet FAR: 9.0
6
DENSITY CONSTRAINTS + UNIT DISTRIBUTION STUDIES Max. Permitted Floor Area (FAR: 9.0) 233,298 SF Residential component 233,298 SF - 20,558 SF (Retail - deductions) 212,740 SF (Residential floor area)
Min. Req’d Recreation Space (Quality Housing)
2 BR
Commercial - Class B units
2.8% (of Residential floor area)
1 BR
Commercial
5,892 SF (excluded from FAR)
Studio / 0 BR
Max. allowable units 212,740 SF / 680 (density factor) 312 units
Hypothetical max. density distribution Micro Units - 540 / 100% 1BR - 0 2+BR - 0 Total - 540 > 312
Density distribution 1: “Mini buildings per type” Micro Units - 142 / 46% 1BR - 94 / 30% 2+BR - 76 / 24% Total - 312
Pros - Struct. & mech. stacking - Micro units ditributed throughout the building -Occupant load variation minimized Cons - Potential limitations for massing design
Density distribution 2: Floorplan divided into regions per type Micro Units - 134 / 43% 1BR - 84 / 27% 2+BR - 94 / 30% Total - 312
Pros - Struct. & mech. stacking - Micro units ditributed throughout the building -Occupant load variation minimized Cons - Potential limitations for massing design
7
DENSITY CONSTRAINTS + UNIT DISTRIBUTION STUDIES 2 BR
Commercial - Class B units
1 BR
Commercial
Studio / 0 BR
Density distribution 3: Micro units on lower oors Micro Units - 115 / 37% 1BR - 130 / 42% 2+BR - 67 / 21% Total - 312
Pros - Bigger units above smaller units reduces MEP coordination Cons - 1 to 2 BR layouts still require coord. w/ micro units below - Uneven distribution of occupant load
Density distribution 4: Max. number of micro units using class B Micro Units - 120 / 29% 1BR - 16 / 4% 2+BR - 29 / 7% Micro (class B) - 252 / 60% Comm. FAR: 5.0 = 252 Res. FAR: 4.0 = 165 Total = 417 units
Pros - Max. no. units combining class A and B - Best location for highly valued 1 to 2BR Cons - 1 to 2 BR layouts to coord. w/ micro units below - Hypothetical max. of class B units req. residential above commercial - Uneven distribution of occupant load
Density distribution 5: Micro units above setback Micro Units - 146 / 47% 1BR - 110 / 35% 2+BR - 56 / 18% Total - 312
Pros - Highest no. of units at upper floors - Micro units at shallower building depth optimize layout Cons - Micro unit mech. systems to be branched down
8
CORE & CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
CL
CL
32’
17’
32’
32’
24’
24’
24’
40’
CL
STUDY A Corridor centered on base volume
24’
24’
32’
32’
CL
STUDY B Corridor centered on setback volume
STUDY C Corridor always centered on base or setback volume
9
RESIDENTIAL UNIT CONSIDERATIONS DWELLINGS CLASS A
DWELLING CLASS B
A “class A” multiple dwelling is a multiple dwelling that is occupied for permanent residence purposes. This class shall include tenements, flat houses, maisonette apartments, apartment houses, apartment hotels, bachelor apartments, studio apartments, duplex apartments, kitchenette apartments, garden-type maisonette dwelling projects, and all other multiple dwellings except class B multiple dwellings. A class A multiple dwelling shall only be used for permanent residence purposes. For the purposes of this definition, “permanent residence purposes” shall consist of occupancy of a dwelling unit by the same natural person or family for thirty consecutive days or more.
A “class B” multiple dwelling is a multiple dwelling which is occupied, as a rule transiently, as the more or less temporary abode of individuals or families who are lodged with or without meals. This class shall include hotels, lodging houses, rooming houses, boarding houses, boarding schools, furnished room houses, lodgings, club houses, college and school dormitories and dwellings designed as private dwellings but occupied by one or two families with five or more transient boarders, roomers or lodgers in one household.
Residential Use / Apartments
Commercial Use / Hotel
- Max. 3 unrelated adults living together (3 BR max.)
- No max. nº of bedrooms/unit
- 100% units need to be ADA accessible
- Small percentage of ADA accessible units req’d (201-300 units = 10 ADA units; 301-400 units = 12 ADA units)
- 1 ADA Kitchen/Unit (Code) - No requirement for kitchens - 1 ADA WC/Unit (Code) - Amenities in the residential component cannot be shared with the commercial component if looking to obtain FAR bonuses via Quality Housing. - Bike parking + Laundry room are required amenities in every residential building (Code)
- No requirement for WCs in every unit. (Minimum 2 WC for the 1st 20 bedrooms + 1 additional WC for every 15 additional bedrooms)
- Amenities dedicated to the residential component can be shared with the commercial component (Coworking)
*Bullet points included above are very broad and simplified for reference only. Further analysis will be required. *https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/buildings/pdf/MultipleDwellingLaw.pdf
10
2. MICRO UNIT STUDIES
11
MICRO UNIT STUDIES - TYPE 1 CLASS A
CLASS B
BA ADA
BA NOT ADA
K ADA
8’ MIN
NO MIN
K NOT REQ’D
BR/L
BR/L
150 SF MIN NO MIN SF
TYPE 1A:
280-365 sf gross 250-330 sf net
TYPE 1B:
260-365 sf gross* 235-330 sf net* *with kitchen
12
MICRO UNIT STUDIES - TYPE 2 CLASS A
CLASS B
BA BA
K
ADA
K
NOT ADA
NOT REQ’D
ADA
BR/L BR/L NO MIN 8’ MIN
NO MIN SF
150 SF MIN
TYPE 2A:
300-330 sf gross 265-295 sf net
TYPE 2B:
280-330 sf gross* 250-295 sf net* *with kitchen
13
MICRO UNIT STUDIES - TYPE 3 CLASS A
CLASS B
K ADA K NOT REQ’D
BR/L
BR/L
BA
BA NOT ADA
ADA NO MIN
8’ MIN 150 SF MIN
TYPE 3A:
300-380 sf gross 260-330 sf net
NO MIN SF
TYPE 3B:
270-380 sf gross* 220-330 sf net* *with kitchen
14
3. LAYOUT STUDIES
15
STUDY 1
All micro units: Type 1 units + 1 BR (Class A) Typical floor area: 18,011 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0 Residential - Use group R2
Typical floor Base
Travel distance: 114’ < 200’
Common path of travel: 114’ < 125’ (R2)
Dead end: 79’ < 80’ (R2)
Separation bet. exits: 100’ > 15’ (R2)
Units/FL
3BR/FL
2BR/FL
1BR/FL
42
0
0
4
Studio/FL Leasable/FL
38
89%
W 31st Street Typ. Type 1A micro Gross: 365sf Net: 320sf Corridor on center w/ base volume
*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.
16
STUDY 2A
Type 1 with Type 2 units (Class A) Typical floor area: 18,011 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0 Residential - Use group R2
Typical floor Base
Travel distance: 95’ < 200’
Common path of travel: 95’ < 125’ (R2)
Dead end: 52’ < 80’ (R2)
Separation bet. exits: 143’ > 15’ (R2)
Units/FL
3BR/FL
2BR/FL
1BR/FL
35
0
0
4
Studio/FL Leasable/FL
31
88%
W 31st Street Typ. Type 1A micro Gross: 465sf Net: 420sf
Corridor on center w/ upper volume (can be shifted north)
Typ. Type 2A micro Gross: 385sf Net: 330sf
*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.
17
STUDY 2B
Type 2 units + 1 BR (Class A) Above Setback Typical floor area: 14,082 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0
Typical floor Setback
Residential - Use group R2 Travel distance: 76’ < 200’
Common path of travel: 76’ < 125’ (R2)
Dead end: 49’ < 80’ (R2)
Separation bet. exits: 144’ > 15’ (R2)
Units/FL
3BR/FL
2BR/FL
1BR/FL
31
0
0
4
Studio/FL Leasable/FL
27
85%
W 31st Street
Corridor on center w/ upper volume
Typ. Type 2A micro Gross: 385sf Net: 330sf
*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.
18
STUDY 3
Type 1 units (Class B) Typical floor area: 18,029 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** < 9.0 Commercial - Use group R1
Typical floor Base
Travel distance: 71’ < 200’
Common path of travel: 71’ < 75’ (R1)
Dead end: 38’ < 40’ (R1)
Separation bet. exits: 161’ > 90’-1/3 diagonal (R1)
Units/FL
3BR/FL
2BR/FL
1BR/FL
40
0
0
6
Studio/FL Leasable/FL
34
90%
W 31st Street Typ. Type 1B micro Gross: 365sf Net: 315sf Corridor on center w/ base volume
Elevator core shown optimized for commercial use, not Quality Housing
*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.
20’ rear yard (commercial)
19
STUDY 4
Unit mix (Stacked, Class A) Typical floor area: 18,011 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0 Residential - Use group R2
Typical floor Base
Travel distance: 113’ < 200’
Common path of travel: 113’ < 125’ (R2)
Dead end: 70’ < 80’ (R2)
Separation bet. exits: 102’ > 15’ (R2)
Units/FL
3BR/FL
2BR/FL
1BR/FL
27
0
8
10
Studio/FL Leasable/FL
9
88%
W 31st Street Typ. Type 1A micro Gross: 465sf Net: 420sf
Corridor on center w/ upper volume
Typ. non micro-units shown approximately to achieve max. no. of units per density factor.
*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.
Typ. Type 2A micro Gross: 385sf Net: 330sf
20
STUDY 5
Unit mix (Stacked, Class A) Typical floor area: 18,011 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0 Residential - Use group R2
Typical floor Base
Travel distance: 81’ < 200’
Common path of travel: 81’ < 125’ (R2)
Dead end: 29’ < 80’ (R2)
Separation bet. exits: 136’ > 15’ (R2)
Units/FL
24
3BR/FL
2
2BR/FL
1BR/FL
9
0
Studio/FL Leasable/FL
13
89%
W 31st Street Typ. non micro-units shown approximately to achieve max. no. of units per density factor. Corridor on center w/ upper volume
Typ. Type 2A micro Gross: 335sf Net: 285sf
*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.
21
4. MASSING STUDIES
22
MASSING STUDIES
STUDY 1 Maximization of bulk (without dormers)
STUDY 4
STUDY 2
STUDY 3
STUDY 5
STUDY 6
23
STUDY 1
Axonometric view
Maximization of bulk (without dormers)
View from 8th Avenue looking West 24
STUDY 2
Axonometric view
Terraced Volume (7.5â&#x20AC;&#x2122; setbacks)
View from 8th Avenue looking West 25
STUDY 3
Axonometric view
Mini-Towers (using dormer, recess and bulkhead)
View from 8th Avenue looking West 26
STUDY 4
Axonometric view
Stepping Setbacks/Serrated Edge
View from 8th Avenue looking West 27
STUDY 5
Axonometric view
3 “Buildings” (using dormers)
View from 8th Avenue looking West 28
STUDY 6
Axonometric view
Stepping Terraces
View from 8th Avenue looking West 29
APPENDIX I: CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS by nARCHITECTS, 2016
30
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
31
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
32
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
33
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
34
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
35
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
36
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
37
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
38
CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS
*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez
39