Worksample_Wei Wen_2014-2018

Page 1


ZGP REAL ESTATE

2017-2018

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF BUILDING DEVELOPEMNT

- 88 ARKANSAS

Residential Condo

- 525 HARRISON

Residential Condo

- 1601 MISSION

Mix use( residential and retail)

- 1135 7TH STREET

Mix use( residential and retail)


88 ARKANSAS

525 HARRISON

Location: San Francisco

Location: San Francisco

Type: Residential Condo

Type: Residential Condo

Unit #: 127

Unit #: 203

Cost: 91 Million

Cost: 162 Million

Status: Under Construction

Status: Design phase

Estimated Delivery: Q4 2019

Estimated Delivery: Q4 2020


1601 MISSION

1135 7TH ST.

Location: San Francisco

Location: Los Angeles

Type: Mix use( residential and retail)

Type: Mix use( residential and retail)

Unit #: 220

Unit #: 241

Commercial: 12,600 sf

Commercial: 17,300 sf

Cost: 168 Million

Cost: 141 Million

Status: Design phase

Status: Design phase

Estimated Delivery: Q3 2021

Estimated Delivery: Q4 2021


nARCHITECTS

2015-2017

ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

- A/D/O - AUBURN CULTURAL CENTER

Coworking design workplace

Cultural center

- CARMEL PLACE

Micro unit prefab residential tower

- HK SYL TOWER

30 stoires luxury residential tower

- POLYCENTRIC PAVILLION - SHANGHAI LIBRARY

Performance pavillion

Information center library


SKYLIGHT

MINI - A/D/O

Amplifying the skylight’s role of introducing daylight and exterior views into interior

Occupying a former warehouse, the 23,000 sf transformation provides a new

space, a periscope-skylight at A/D/O offers views otherwise impossible to perceive.

space open to the general public, combining spaces for events and exhibitions,

Mirrors on the periscope’s underside reflect distant views of Manhattan and Brooklyn,

design education, free communal workspace, a fabrication lab, a restaurant,

joining them into a single unfamiliar skyline.

and a design shop. A central feature of the project is a large kaleidoscopic periscope that joins the Brooklyn and Manhattan skylines into a single horizon.


A/D/O




A/D/O


A/D/O A/D A/ A //D D/O D/O /O


COURTYARD

AUBURN CULTURAL CENTER

The Courtyard as an sight frame, circulation connector, incubate activities.

The scheme is characterized by cutting courtyard that connect each vision frame to the historical preservation building around and the city beyond, also it justifies the rotation of the 3 inner volumes and 3 outer volumes to generate dynamic interior exhibition spaces.

Auburn Cultural Center


Auburn Cultural Center



Auburn Cultural Center




TOWER

CARMEL PLACE

Rather than inscribing a new tower within a city’s urban context, Carmel Place is

Carmel Place is the city’s first micro-unit apartment building. The building’s 55

conceived as a microcosm of a city skyline. The tower here is considered an architectural

studio apartments, which range from 260-360sf, are luminous and efficient, with

rather than urban element, multiplied and denisifed as a new paradigm for micro living.

a feeling of spaciousness due to their 9’-8” ceiling heights, 8’ tall windows, Juliet balconies and overhead storage.



Carmel Place


Carmel Place


Carmel Place


Carmel Place


Carmel Place


FLOOR

HONGKONG SYL TOWER

The floor functions as an object (horizontal, structural plane), designates

HONG KONG SYL TOWER in HONG KONG China establishes a vertically

location (nth floor), and divides space vertically into occupiable space.

diminishing floor-to-floor height to provide a range of housing types, and equitable compensation of interior space in exchange for views.

Hong Kong Tower


Hong Kong Kon Tower


Hong Kong Tower



Hong Kong Tower



Terracottaa cladding, see 22/A-500 Mtl. rope for climbing plants anchored to top and bbottom angles Mtl. flashing flashin Light fixture mounted on angle anchored to co concrete curb Mtl. cladding Mtl. cladding attachment system Planter drain pipe Air water barrier Concrete planter Concrete curb

555 355

150

50

Cut terracotta acotta as req'd

Mtl. cap Glass guardrail on alum. shoe Light fixture, see lighting drawings Mtl. fascia

450

400

Decking

150

10

Terracotta cladding

Align

AXON: TYP. INT. CORNER @ NICHE 1:10

11

AXON: TYP. CORNER TYPE 1/2 1:10

Concrete curb Terracotta cladding

Typ. custom ustom corner terracott terracotta panel

10

Stone coping 1150

80

05

DTL. SECTION: TYP. PLANTER W/ TERRACOTTA 1:10

03

DTL. SECTION: TYP. REST. TERRACE 1:10

650

Light post

Terracotta cladding Terracotta cladding @ soffit

Lighting support

Mtl. fascia 300

Flat terracotta panel

Air / water barrier Block wall Interior finish

Typ. 4

196

Terracotta panel Terracotta mtl. clip Mtl. vertical supports anchored to Z-girts Z-girts anchored to block wall

Typ. Mtl. edge

Custom terracotta corner piece type 1

196

Mtl. angle anchored to block wall Mtl. rope for climbing plants anchored to top and bottom angles

Scalloped terracotta panel

DTL. PLAN: TYP. CUSTOM CORNER TYPE 1 1:10

04

SECTION DTL: TYP. TERRACOTTA ASSEMBLY 1:10

1:10

196

5 deg.

Flashing Honed dark granite Sealant and backer rod Concrete curb

08

25 25 25

Varies, min. 100

DTL. PLAN: TYP. CUSTOM CORNER TYPE 2 1:10

DTL. SECTION: TYP. NICHE W/ GLAZING

196

Custom terracotta corner piece type 2

07

07

DTL. SECTION: TYP. TERRACOTTA @ GRADE 1:10

450

03

1300

Mtl. storefront w/ clear glazing

Mtl. storefront w/ clear glazing Mtl. angle to support climbing plants Light fixture

11

DTL. SECTION: TYP. PLANTER W/ GLAZING 1:10

12

DTL. SECTION: CLUBHOUSE TERRACE 1:10


Barrel Vault

Groin Vault

Skewed Barrel Vault

Intersecting Vaults

Morphed Vault

VAULT

Adjacent Vaults

Rib Vault

Split Vault

Reverse Split Vault

POLYCENTRIC PAVILION

Liberated from their heavy masonry antecedents, the bamboo vaults in Forest Pavilion

Polycentric Pavilion is conceived of as both an area for passive

and aluminum vaults in Polycentric Pavilion for the Milan Triennale explore deviations from

lounging and a model for a more active and multi-directional theater.

original types. Made possible by their thin-ness, the vaults now connect in continuous,

The varying relationship between the vaults, the deck, and the void

unfolding spatial networks, generating new possibilities for performances within them.

allows performers and audience to appropriate decking as stage or seating, resulting in multiple performance configurations.

Fan Vault

Two to One Vault

Merged Vaults



Polycentric Pavilion, XXI Milan Triennale


Polycentric Pavilion, XXI Milan Triennale


GARDEN

SHANGHAI LIBRARY

The floor functions as an object (horizontal, structural plane), designates

The scheme is characterized by open floors that connect library activities to nature and

location (nth floor), and divides space vertically into occupiable space.

the city beyond, and compact floors that store a wide range of information formats and supporting functions. Supported by the compact levels below – both structurally and programmatically - these open floors are imagined as the city’s Patio, Living Room, Atelier and Study: a Library as Home. Shanghai Library East Hall



Shanghai Library East Hall



Shanghai Library East Hall


஗ࡴ‫؁‬ Terracotta printing blocks T

‫كי‬戳வ Glazed exterior

ୌ‫ޗك‬戳வ Natural unglazed interior

Shanghai Library East Hall


TRIBECA ASSOCIATES FEASIBILITY STUDY - 320 W 31 STREET


TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Zoning & Code considerations - Z&C constraints - Bulk vs FAR constraints - Density constraints + Unit distribution studies - Core & corridor constraints - Residential unit considerations 2. Micro Unit Studies 3. Layout Studies 4. Massing Studies Appendix I: Carmel Place - Micro units

2


1. ZONING & CODE CONSIDERATIONS

3


ZONING & CODE CONSTRAINTS C6-3X

*Information and diagrams in this section are extracted from the Zoning Handbook, New York City Department of City Planning.

R9X

C6 districts permit a wide range of high-bulk commercial uses requiring a central location. Most C6 districts are in Manhattan, Downtown Brooklyn and Downtown Jamaica; a C6-3D district is mapped in the Civic Center area of the Bronx. Corporate headquarters, large hotels, department stores and entertainment facilities in high-rise mixed buildings are permitted in C6 districts.

R9X contextual districts (and C1-8X, C2-7X and C6-3X districts with an R9X residential district equivalent), mapped only in Manhattan, are governed by Quality Housing regulations. With a floor area ratio (FAR) and height limit substantially higher than other R9 districts, R9X regulations produce the taller, bulkier 16- to 18-story apartment buildings characteristic of Chelsea and Murray Hill in Manhattan.

C6-1, C6-2 and most C6-3 districts, typically mapped in areas outside central business cores, such as the Lower East Side and Chelsea, have a commercial floor area ratio (FAR) of 6.0; the C6-3D district has an FAR of 9.0. C6-4 through C6-9 districts, typically mapped within the city’s major business districts, have a maximum FAR of 10.0 or 15.0, exclusive of any applicable bonus. Floor area may be increased by a bonus for a public plaza or Inclusionary Housing.

The FAR in R9X districts is 9.0. On a wide street, the base height of a new building must be 105 to 120 feet with a 10 foot setback before rising to a maximum height of 170 feet. On a wide street, the street wall must extend along the entire width of the zoning lot and at least 70% of the street wall must be within eight feet of the street line. On a narrow street, the base height must be 60 to 120 feet with a 15-foot setback before rising to a maximum height of 160 feet.

C6-2A, C6-3A, C6-3X and C6-4A are contextual districts with maximum building heights. C6-3D and C6-4X districts allow towers above a building base; special rules determine the tower’s height and articulation. All other C6 districts allow towers to penetrate a sky exposure plane and do not require a contextual base.

Off-street parking is not required for any development in the Manhattan Core. Elsewhere, parking is required for 40% of the dwelling units

C6 districts are widely mapped within special districts. C6-4.5, C6-5.5, C6-6.5 and C6-7T districts are mapped only within the Special Midtown District and have unique floor area ratios and bonus rules. C6-1G, C6-2G, C6-2M and C6-4M districts are mapped in Chinatown and Chelsea and in the Special Garment Center District, and have rules for the conversion of non-residential space to residential use. C6 districts are well served by mass transit, and off-street parking is generally not required, except within the C6-3D district.

4


ZONING & CODE CONSTRAINTS 320 W 31st Street

C6-3X / R9X

25,922 sf

FAR: 9.0

ZSF 233,298 sf

Address

320 West 31st Street, Interior lot

Lot Area

25,922 SF (Lot Dimension: 262.5’ x 98.75’)

Zoning

C6-3X (R9X Equivalent - Quality Housing) Special Zoning District Overlay N/A Landmarks Preservation District N/A NYC designated Landmarks N/A

Max. FAR

6 (Only Commercial Uses) 9 (Community Facility or Both Community Facility and Commercial Uses) 9 (Residential Uses - Quality Housing)

C6-3X

Max. Permitted Floor Area 25,922 SF x 9 = 233,298 SF (Residential, Community Facility, or Community Facility + Commercial Uses) 25,922 SF x 6 = 155,532 SF (Commercial Uses) Lot Coverage

100% (Ground floor - Commercial)

Base Height

60’-120’ (min/max)

Building Height

160’ (max)

Front Setback

15’ (narrow street)

70% (Interior lot - Residential)

Rear Setback

Not required (ZQA)

Rear yard

30’ min. (not higher than 23’ above curb level), Residential

Parking

Not required

5


BULK VS FAR CONSTRAINTS 320 W 31st Street

C6-3X / R9X

25,922 sf

FAR: 9.3

ZSF 241,550 sf

MAXIMUMIZATION OF BULK FAR: 9.3 MAXIMUM FAR ALLOWED FAR: 9.0 10’-0” (Typ.)

HYPOTHETICAL FAR (MAXIMIZATION OF BULK) Ground floor

15’-0” Setback (from street wall @ narrow street)

10’-0” (Typ.)

20’-0” GF (23’-0” max.) 160’-0” max.

25,870 SF (Lot Dimension: 262.5’ x 98.75’)

Cellar

25,870 SF

2nd-11th FL

18,030 SF (x10)

12th-15th FL

14,095 SF (x4) - Not including dormers*

TOTAL GSF

262,550 SF

TOTAL ZSF

241,550 SF**

FAR

9.3 / 9.5 (with dormers)

EXCESS

7,550 SF /12,685 SF with dormers***

*Allowed dormers= 5,135 SF (not illustrated on diagram, not necessary to meet max. FAR) **Assuming 8% QH/mechanical/facade improvement deduction 60’-0”/120’-0” (min./max.)

***To be subtracted from max. bulk to meet FAR: 9.0

Maximized bulk (not including dormers) 7,550 SF to be subtracted from bulk to meet FAR: 9.0

6


DENSITY CONSTRAINTS + UNIT DISTRIBUTION STUDIES Max. Permitted Floor Area (FAR: 9.0) 233,298 SF Residential component 233,298 SF - 20,558 SF (Retail - deductions) 212,740 SF (Residential floor area)

Min. Req’d Recreation Space (Quality Housing)

2 BR

Commercial - Class B units

2.8% (of Residential floor area)

1 BR

Commercial

5,892 SF (excluded from FAR)

Studio / 0 BR

Max. allowable units 212,740 SF / 680 (density factor) 312 units

Hypothetical max. density distribution Micro Units - 540 / 100% 1BR - 0 2+BR - 0 Total - 540 > 312

Density distribution 1: “Mini buildings per type” Micro Units - 142 / 46% 1BR - 94 / 30% 2+BR - 76 / 24% Total - 312

Pros - Struct. & mech. stacking - Micro units ditributed throughout the building -Occupant load variation minimized Cons - Potential limitations for massing design

Density distribution 2: Floorplan divided into regions per type Micro Units - 134 / 43% 1BR - 84 / 27% 2+BR - 94 / 30% Total - 312

Pros - Struct. & mech. stacking - Micro units ditributed throughout the building -Occupant load variation minimized Cons - Potential limitations for massing design

7


DENSITY CONSTRAINTS + UNIT DISTRIBUTION STUDIES 2 BR

Commercial - Class B units

1 BR

Commercial

Studio / 0 BR

Density distribution 3: Micro units on lower oors Micro Units - 115 / 37% 1BR - 130 / 42% 2+BR - 67 / 21% Total - 312

Pros - Bigger units above smaller units reduces MEP coordination Cons - 1 to 2 BR layouts still require coord. w/ micro units below - Uneven distribution of occupant load

Density distribution 4: Max. number of micro units using class B Micro Units - 120 / 29% 1BR - 16 / 4% 2+BR - 29 / 7% Micro (class B) - 252 / 60% Comm. FAR: 5.0 = 252 Res. FAR: 4.0 = 165 Total = 417 units

Pros - Max. no. units combining class A and B - Best location for highly valued 1 to 2BR Cons - 1 to 2 BR layouts to coord. w/ micro units below - Hypothetical max. of class B units req. residential above commercial - Uneven distribution of occupant load

Density distribution 5: Micro units above setback Micro Units - 146 / 47% 1BR - 110 / 35% 2+BR - 56 / 18% Total - 312

Pros - Highest no. of units at upper floors - Micro units at shallower building depth optimize layout Cons - Micro unit mech. systems to be branched down

8


CORE & CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS

CL

CL

32’

17’

32’

32’

24’

24’

24’

40’

CL

STUDY A Corridor centered on base volume

24’

24’

32’

32’

CL

STUDY B Corridor centered on setback volume

STUDY C Corridor always centered on base or setback volume

9


RESIDENTIAL UNIT CONSIDERATIONS DWELLINGS CLASS A

DWELLING CLASS B

A “class A” multiple dwelling is a multiple dwelling that is occupied for permanent residence purposes. This class shall include tenements, flat houses, maisonette apartments, apartment houses, apartment hotels, bachelor apartments, studio apartments, duplex apartments, kitchenette apartments, garden-type maisonette dwelling projects, and all other multiple dwellings except class B multiple dwellings. A class A multiple dwelling shall only be used for permanent residence purposes. For the purposes of this definition, “permanent residence purposes” shall consist of occupancy of a dwelling unit by the same natural person or family for thirty consecutive days or more.

A “class B” multiple dwelling is a multiple dwelling which is occupied, as a rule transiently, as the more or less temporary abode of individuals or families who are lodged with or without meals. This class shall include hotels, lodging houses, rooming houses, boarding houses, boarding schools, furnished room houses, lodgings, club houses, college and school dormitories and dwellings designed as private dwellings but occupied by one or two families with five or more transient boarders, roomers or lodgers in one household.

Residential Use / Apartments

Commercial Use / Hotel

- Max. 3 unrelated adults living together (3 BR max.)

- No max. nº of bedrooms/unit

- 100% units need to be ADA accessible

- Small percentage of ADA accessible units req’d (201-300 units = 10 ADA units; 301-400 units = 12 ADA units)

- 1 ADA Kitchen/Unit (Code) - No requirement for kitchens - 1 ADA WC/Unit (Code) - Amenities in the residential component cannot be shared with the commercial component if looking to obtain FAR bonuses via Quality Housing. - Bike parking + Laundry room are required amenities in every residential building (Code)

- No requirement for WCs in every unit. (Minimum 2 WC for the 1st 20 bedrooms + 1 additional WC for every 15 additional bedrooms)

- Amenities dedicated to the residential component can be shared with the commercial component (Coworking)

*Bullet points included above are very broad and simplified for reference only. Further analysis will be required. *https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/buildings/pdf/MultipleDwellingLaw.pdf

10


2. MICRO UNIT STUDIES

11


MICRO UNIT STUDIES - TYPE 1 CLASS A

CLASS B

BA ADA

BA NOT ADA

K ADA

8’ MIN

NO MIN

K NOT REQ’D

BR/L

BR/L

150 SF MIN NO MIN SF

TYPE 1A:

280-365 sf gross 250-330 sf net

TYPE 1B:

260-365 sf gross* 235-330 sf net* *with kitchen

12


MICRO UNIT STUDIES - TYPE 2 CLASS A

CLASS B

BA BA

K

ADA

K

NOT ADA

NOT REQ’D

ADA

BR/L BR/L NO MIN 8’ MIN

NO MIN SF

150 SF MIN

TYPE 2A:

300-330 sf gross 265-295 sf net

TYPE 2B:

280-330 sf gross* 250-295 sf net* *with kitchen

13


MICRO UNIT STUDIES - TYPE 3 CLASS A

CLASS B

K ADA K NOT REQ’D

BR/L

BR/L

BA

BA NOT ADA

ADA NO MIN

8’ MIN 150 SF MIN

TYPE 3A:

300-380 sf gross 260-330 sf net

NO MIN SF

TYPE 3B:

270-380 sf gross* 220-330 sf net* *with kitchen

14


3. LAYOUT STUDIES

15


STUDY 1

All micro units: Type 1 units + 1 BR (Class A) Typical floor area: 18,011 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0 Residential - Use group R2

Typical floor Base

Travel distance: 114’ < 200’

Common path of travel: 114’ < 125’ (R2)

Dead end: 79’ < 80’ (R2)

Separation bet. exits: 100’ > 15’ (R2)

Units/FL

3BR/FL

2BR/FL

1BR/FL

42

0

0

4

Studio/FL Leasable/FL

38

89%

W 31st Street Typ. Type 1A micro Gross: 365sf Net: 320sf Corridor on center w/ base volume

*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.

16


STUDY 2A

Type 1 with Type 2 units (Class A) Typical floor area: 18,011 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0 Residential - Use group R2

Typical floor Base

Travel distance: 95’ < 200’

Common path of travel: 95’ < 125’ (R2)

Dead end: 52’ < 80’ (R2)

Separation bet. exits: 143’ > 15’ (R2)

Units/FL

3BR/FL

2BR/FL

1BR/FL

35

0

0

4

Studio/FL Leasable/FL

31

88%

W 31st Street Typ. Type 1A micro Gross: 465sf Net: 420sf

Corridor on center w/ upper volume (can be shifted north)

Typ. Type 2A micro Gross: 385sf Net: 330sf

*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.

17


STUDY 2B

Type 2 units + 1 BR (Class A) Above Setback Typical floor area: 14,082 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0

Typical floor Setback

Residential - Use group R2 Travel distance: 76’ < 200’

Common path of travel: 76’ < 125’ (R2)

Dead end: 49’ < 80’ (R2)

Separation bet. exits: 144’ > 15’ (R2)

Units/FL

3BR/FL

2BR/FL

1BR/FL

31

0

0

4

Studio/FL Leasable/FL

27

85%

W 31st Street

Corridor on center w/ upper volume

Typ. Type 2A micro Gross: 385sf Net: 330sf

*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.

18


STUDY 3

Type 1 units (Class B) Typical floor area: 18,029 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** < 9.0 Commercial - Use group R1

Typical floor Base

Travel distance: 71’ < 200’

Common path of travel: 71’ < 75’ (R1)

Dead end: 38’ < 40’ (R1)

Separation bet. exits: 161’ > 90’-1/3 diagonal (R1)

Units/FL

3BR/FL

2BR/FL

1BR/FL

40

0

0

6

Studio/FL Leasable/FL

34

90%

W 31st Street Typ. Type 1B micro Gross: 365sf Net: 315sf Corridor on center w/ base volume

Elevator core shown optimized for commercial use, not Quality Housing

*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.

20’ rear yard (commercial)

19


STUDY 4

Unit mix (Stacked, Class A) Typical floor area: 18,011 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0 Residential - Use group R2

Typical floor Base

Travel distance: 113’ < 200’

Common path of travel: 113’ < 125’ (R2)

Dead end: 70’ < 80’ (R2)

Separation bet. exits: 102’ > 15’ (R2)

Units/FL

3BR/FL

2BR/FL

1BR/FL

27

0

8

10

Studio/FL Leasable/FL

9

88%

W 31st Street Typ. Type 1A micro Gross: 465sf Net: 420sf

Corridor on center w/ upper volume

Typ. non micro-units shown approximately to achieve max. no. of units per density factor.

*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.

Typ. Type 2A micro Gross: 385sf Net: 330sf

20


STUDY 5

Unit mix (Stacked, Class A) Typical floor area: 18,011 gsf* Estimated FAR: 9.3** > 9.0 Residential - Use group R2

Typical floor Base

Travel distance: 81’ < 200’

Common path of travel: 81’ < 125’ (R2)

Dead end: 29’ < 80’ (R2)

Separation bet. exits: 136’ > 15’ (R2)

Units/FL

24

3BR/FL

2

2BR/FL

1BR/FL

9

0

Studio/FL Leasable/FL

13

89%

W 31st Street Typ. non micro-units shown approximately to achieve max. no. of units per density factor. Corridor on center w/ upper volume

Typ. Type 2A micro Gross: 335sf Net: 285sf

*Plans show a 3” recess at East and West sides of property line per seismic requirements, 12” facade assembly, and 6” wall thickness between units. **Before subtractions for massing design, and not incorporating potential dormers.

21


4. MASSING STUDIES

22


MASSING STUDIES

STUDY 1 Maximization of bulk (without dormers)

STUDY 4

STUDY 2

STUDY 3

STUDY 5

STUDY 6

23


STUDY 1

Axonometric view

Maximization of bulk (without dormers)

View from 8th Avenue looking West 24


STUDY 2

Axonometric view

Terraced Volume (7.5’ setbacks)

View from 8th Avenue looking West 25


STUDY 3

Axonometric view

Mini-Towers (using dormer, recess and bulkhead)

View from 8th Avenue looking West 26


STUDY 4

Axonometric view

Stepping Setbacks/Serrated Edge

View from 8th Avenue looking West 27


STUDY 5

Axonometric view

3 “Buildings” (using dormers)

View from 8th Avenue looking West 28


STUDY 6

Axonometric view

Stepping Terraces

View from 8th Avenue looking West 29


APPENDIX I: CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS by nARCHITECTS, 2016

30


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

31


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

32


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

33


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

34


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

35


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

36


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

37


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

38


CARMEL PLACE - MICRO UNITS

*Courtesy nARCHITECTS, image courtesy Pablo Enriquez

39


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.