12 minute read

FEATURE

Next Article
SPORTS

SPORTS

SILENCED

06 FEATURE MAY 24, 2022 With social media being home to an abundance of opinions, news and debates, discussions surrounding censorship have emerged.

Advertisement

BY MAYA CHU AND JANE LAM

Twitter announced April 25 that it accepted Elon Musk’s offer to buy the social media platform for $44 billion. Musk, the CEO of Tesla and an avid Twitter user, hopes to make the platform a hub for free speech. He also said March 10 that he plans to reverse Twitter’s ban of former President Donald Trump’s account. Musk’s plans for Twitter have sparked debate over whether social media companies should censor content they deem inappropriate. Miles Clark ’22 believes Musk’s Twitter takeover is a step in the right direction.

“One of his primary goals … is to encourage the making of a platform where everyone can say their own thoughts, and they won’t have fear of getting banned from the website,” Clark said. “It’s going to be an intellectual hub for all different ideas.”

To Clark, social media censorship is almost always a bad thing because it can create a less informed society. He believes even if something is not factually correct, it is still productive and allows people to interact with information.

“If you have a large quantity of viewpoints represented in your discussion circle … then you can do what’s called ‘testing’ of those ideas,” Clark said. “That includes arguing against said ideas and finding out what is wrong or right with those ideas. That’s why having intellectual diversity is good — it allows all of the viewpoints to get thoroughly examined and then have the best one rise to the top.”

One example Clark provides of this argument testing comes from debates over COVID-19 vaccines.

“Whenever I argue with someone who doesn’t like the COVID vaccine, they always come up with some point that I could have never imagined existed,” Clark said. “So I can never prepare a response to it beforehand …because as soon as [a user] would post it, it would get taken down.”

West alumni Jeff Albright is the President of Yanmar America, a global diesel engine and manufacturing company based in Japan. In the early 2000s, he did business in Shanghai and witnessed the effects of censorship in China, which has one of the world’s most restrictive media environments. Albright says that although social media has the potential to connect many viewpoints, it often fails to happen due to online echo chambers, where people are only exposed to their own beliefs.

“There are two different things going on: users won’t see that information and most people aren’t looking for opposing viewpoints,” Albright said. “Most people are looking to simplify life.”

Albright’s experience in China shaped his views on censorship and led to a greater appreciation for the comparatively uncensored media culture in the US.

“I’ve come to value our approach to the world. Politicians in America, their corruption is often first rooted out by the press. Business people, their misdeeds are often pointed out by a free press or open speech,” Albright said. “That is a really important fabric of who we are.”

When taken to such an extreme, the effects of censorship can shape how young people grow up and formulate opinions. Albright observed this as a graduate student in Hong Kong.

“In my opinion, more and more Chinese youth are very nationalistic [and] they see a very narrow view of the world,” Albright said. “A few of [my classmates] were very sensitive to any criti-

“WHEN … A COMPANY CENSORS YOU, THAT’S BASICALLY TAKING AWAY YOUR RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ONLINE WORLD”

-TOMMY PIERCE ‘22

“[FREE SPEECH] IS A REALLY IMPORTANT FABRIC OF WHO WE ARE”

-JEFF ALBRIGHT, PRESIDENT OF YANMAR AMERICA

SPEECH

ART, PHOTO & DESIGN BY WILLIAM CHENG

cism of the Chinese government.”

Although Albright believes it is difficult to draw a line for when censorship goes too far, he says there should be restrictions for speech with dangerous implications.

“For people who are trying to incite violence or disadvantage others … there should be some kind of guardrails,” Albright said.

Even for content such as hate speech, Clark thinks censorship sets a bad precedent.

“Allowing people to take down what they deem as hate speech … could lead to the ability to have complete suppression,” Clark said. “It’s hard for me to think of a case where hate speech should be banned unless it is actively calling for violence against a specific person.”

Briar Martin ’24 often uses Instagram to speak out on social issues and is conflicted about social media censorship. She believes in giving people a platform to speak on issues that matter to them, but says it is important to minimize harm and avoid perpetuating hate online.

“A lot of the time, certain companies will censor things that shouldn’t be [censored]. For example, on TikTok … there are videos that are taken off the ‘For You page’ because they’re calling out racism or things like that,” Martin said. “I think censorship should only be against things that are actually harmful.”

The discussion surrounding damaging content reached a peak when whistleblower Frances Haugen ’02 exposed Facebook’s practice of boosting the visibility of violent and controversial content to spark more interaction with posts and the app overall. This claim initiated further debate about the power of big social media corporations.

On the other end of the spectrum, companies have also come under fire for too much censorship. Flagging posts and banning users may seem unconstitutional to some, but the First Amendment does not protect freedom of speech on social media as it only applies to the government restricting speech, not private actors like Twitter or Instagram.

Even so, there are instances in which users believe social media companies are unfairly removing content. For example, Clark believes politically-targeted censorship is almost guaranteed.

“You look at the Twitter staff, and [almost all] of their donations go to … the Democratic Party, and so they’re going to have their own bias inserted into what they flag, whether they like it or not,” Clark said.

Musk’s recent purchase of Twitter has been praised by those who disagree with past actions of the platform. One example of this is Twitter’s removal of a New York Post article which exposed negative content from Hunter Biden’s laptop.

“They released [the article] right before the election, and it’s a factually correct story. And Twitter banned them and stopped the spread of that article specifically,” Clark said. “Censorship of some ideas can influence election results [at the extreme], but broadly, having less informed societies is a bad thing too, maybe even worse than the results of one specific election.”

On many popular social media apps, a combination of artificial intelligence technology and staff who professionally review posts influence content censorship. Apps also allow users to report harmful content that violates standards set by the platform. These reports are then reviewed by real content moderators. However, personal bias can impact reviews of the content, which raises major questions over how social media censorship should be structured.

“In reality, you’re not going to be able to satisfy everyone,” said Tommy Pierce ’22. “Something [can be] offensive to one person, but there’s too much gray area to decide what qualifies as offensive.”

Some apps have begun looking into AI for answers, hoping for a non-biased perspective from a machine without the ability to connect on a personal level. However, these algorithms can be equally as harmful when determining which posts should be flagged or taken down.

For example, activists who wish to reclaim hurtful words or slurs are often flagged because some algorithms target the usage of particular terms. A study by the University of Washington and Carnegie Mellon University found that tweets written in African American Vernacular English were twice as likely to be flagged and labeled as offensive.

Pierce emphasizes how censorship can hinder social media’s role as a platform for people to express their thoughts.

“People won’t be able to speak up or speak about ... issues important to them because they have no way to do so,” Pierce said.

MAY 24, 2022 FEATURE 07

FACULTY

FAREWELL

WSS SAYS GOODBYE TO THREE STAFF MEMBERS WHO WILL BE LEAVING WEST HIGH AFTER THIS SCHOOL YEAR.

BY HEIDI DU

PHOTOS BY DEFNE BAYMAN DESIGN BY ATHENA WU

08PROFILES MAY 24, 2022

CHARLIE STUMPFF

WSS: “How has it felt for you to experience West High growing in the past 30 years?” Stumpff: “Mr. Welch is who I have lunch with, [and] the music department is just incredible. I have close ties to the athletic department, and we’ve just grown and [had] lots of really good student athletes and just a lot of really good teacher-coaches that have just embraced the culture. I think anybody who has been here is very proud of where we’ve come to and what we’ve accomplished here, and I look forward to seeing West continue that.” WSS: “What parting advice would you give to athletes at West?” Stumpff: “You know, we always have those goals like, ‘Oh, we’re gonna win conference, gonna go to state, win state.’ Those are your dreams, and they’re just dreams if you’re not going to do the daily work. We’re like everything else, whether it’s a musician or athlete, you do [the work] and then it’s time to perform and the lights are on, so we want to perform well.” WSS: “What are some things you’ll remember the most about coaching at West?” Stumpff: “It’s gonna be memories. That’s what I found. Rarely do we talk about that game, that thing, that score. It’s the goofy thing that happened on the bus ride, the thing that happened in practice. And you know, I don’t think enjoying the experience and winning should be mutually exclusive. We want to have good memories, and we hope we’ve got enough to meet all those goals, but we’re going to enjoy the ride on the way to that final place.” WSS: “What will you miss the most about West?” Stumpff: “The whole essence of teaching and coaching is forming relationships, and I won’t have that anymore. Every year is a whole bunch of new people: you get to learn and see where they came from, where they’re going, what they’re doing and how we can help along the way. I think that’s what I’ll miss. The faculty and my peers and you guys, students, [I] learn so much. And that old adage is [that] you guys do keep us young. So I appreciate that.” WSS: “What are your reasons for retiring this year?” Stumpff: “I’m old. It just seems the time is right for another journey in life. You know, you just have to be cognizant of your age and I’d like to do some other things and not be tied down to an eight-to-four job — coaching is much more, nine months out of the year. [But] I look forward to coming to work, look forward to coaching with my guys, so it’s nothing negative. It’s more [I’m] ready for a new journey, a new place to go.”

CHRIS MARKS

WSS: “What’s your favorite part about being a para?” Marks: “My favorite part is when a light bulb goes off in a student’s mind [about] something they were having problems understanding. I can help them, and all of a sudden they say, ‘Aha, I know how to do this now.’ If I can get students to do those things, I’m doing my job well.” WSS: “Do you have any favorite memories that you’ve made from teaching here?” Marks: “Well, always relationships, I’ve struck up with some of the kids. It always keeps you young, working with high school teenagers, and confounding at the same time. But yeah, I’ve enjoyed assisting the students I’ve been assigned to.” WSS: “What are some things that you’ll miss most about West?” Marks: “I’ve always been impressed by the dedication of the teachers to their profession here. I’ve never met a teacher here who is not dedicated to their students. So I will miss observing that in the classroom.” WSS: “What are your reasons for retiring this school year?” Marks: “I’m aging out. I’m 65 years old. And there are a number of things I want to do in my remaining years: travel, walk my dogs, relax and read. So I’ve worked long enough.” WSS: “What is your favorite thing about teaching music at West?” Medd: “The number one [thing] is the type of student that I get to work with here at West. The students here, I think, fit my personality better than pretty much any other high school in Iowa [I’ve worked at.] I get the feeling [that] teaching here with the band and orchestra students is more of a small college atmosphere sometimes. There’s just something about West High that I feel like I connect with.” WSS: “What are some of your best memories at West?” Medd: “I think, more often than not, the greatest memories I have are just being able to stand in front of the Jazz Ensemble at the end of the year and just listen to them play together as a professional band. They don’t need a conductor anymore and I just listen to them play with all sorts of emotion and subtlety.” WSS: “How do you feel about leaving West High after 27 years?” Medd: “[I’m feeling] very bittersweet about retiring. It’s the right thing to do for my health and the right thing to do for the family and it’s not really retirement, it’s just an opportunity to flip and try something else for a while. I just don’t really know what that is besides playing and teaching lessons. The opportunity was there and talking to a lot of my family and the other musicians that I know and other teachers, they said, ‘Yeah, this is a good opportunity. So, give it a shot.’” WSS: “What will you miss about West High?” Medd: “Most of it is just developing relationships with the students and then also being able to teach music. And that’s been the thing that makes me a little sad or emotional about leaving, because that’s what I’m gonna miss.”

RICH MEDD

MAY 24, 2022 PROFILES 09

This article is from: