Bellagio 2015 | Final Report
Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
A report authored by the Wharton Social Impact Initiative with support from The Rockefeller Foundation
Contents | Overview 4 Guiding the Conversation 9 Creating a Framework: Spurring the Innovation Agenda 10 Creating a Framework: Designing & Enabling Success 12 Opportunities for Action 15 Conclusion 18
This report was authored by the Wharton Social Impact Initiative (WSII) of the University of Pennsylvania as part of a grant by The Rockefeller Foundation to advance the agenda for innovative finance. WSII and The Rockefeller Foundation are working together to explore how we might foster more innovative financial mechanisms for tackling some of the world’s most complex and enduring social problems. The discussions held at the “Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance� convening and the information provided in this report are solely for informational purposes. Nothing discussed or contained in this report constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Nothing discussed or contained in this report shall be viewed as a current or past recommendation or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities or to adopt any investment strategy.
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
3
In April 2015, The Rockefeller Foundation and The Wharton Social Impact Initiative hosted “Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance,” a convening to explore financial mechanisms for social and environmental impact. The meeting brought together leaders from the worlds of finance, international development, philanthropy, and academia to take a fresh look at the potential of innovative finance – or new ways of harnessing private sector capital for addressing the world’s key social, economic, and environmental problems. This report outlines key findings and outcomes from the convening, held from April 21-23, 2015 at The Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center on Lake Como, Italy.
Overview
In 2000, the international community committed to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), a set of time-bound targets for cutting extreme poverty worldwide in half by 2015. Now in 2016, we look toward achieving the new Sustainable Development Goals.
The MDGs galvanized efforts to increase
for success structures, to advanced market
funding levels for international development
commitments and new insurance products.
projects. Leaders called for a renewed
Notable examples include the International
commitment to increase official development
Finance Facility for Immunization (IFFIm)
assistance (ODA) to 0.7% of GDP and to
which has raised more than US $5 billion to
develop new approaches and mechanisms for
date to support the Gavi Alliance, the world’s
financing development. Reflecting a growing
leading health organization committed to
interest in these new approaches and
increasing access to immunization in poor
mechanisms, delegates to the United Nations
countries.
International Conference on Financing for Development first declared “innovative
Green Bonds are another example of
finance” a policy priority under the Monterrey
innovative finance success. First launched in
Consensus in 2002.
2007 with US $800 million in issuances for climate-related investments, the green bond
Innovative finance refers to new mechanisms
markets has grown to US $42 billion in 2015.
and approaches to harness private sector
Yet another mechanism is UNITAID, a public
capital for addressing the world’s key social,
sector-driven levy on airline tickets that has
economic, and environmental problems.
successfully raised US $2.5 billion for public health since 2006. (For more examples in
These financing mechanisms and approaches
innovative finance, see Box 1.)
have taken a variety of forms across fields and geographies, from blended finance and pay
While these examples point to significant
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
5
“
Innovative finance: new mechanisms and approaches to harness private sector capital for addressing the world’s key social, economic, and environmental problems.”
progress, the amount of money mobilized through innovative finance mechanisms remains modest, relative to the need. According to a recent industry study, innovative finance mechanisms mobilized between US $90$100 billion of public and private capital from 2001 to 2013. By comparison during the same period, roughly US $1.6 trillion flowed through official development assistance (ODA), and more than $150 trillion is currently invested in the global capital markets. Looking toward the post-2015 development agenda, there is widespread recognition that prevailing levels of financial resources from governments and the donor/philanthropic community are inadequate to address the social
BOX 1: Examples of innovative finance in action.
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE FACILITY FOR
IMMUNIZATION (IFFIM): IFFIm’s aim is to front-load aid funding by transforming long-term donor government pledges into immediately-available cash resources. In order to do this, IFFIm attracted legally-binding, financial commitments of nearly $4 billion over 20 years from five governments, enabling it to issue AAA-rated bonds to institutional investors. The bonds raised nearly $1 billion in the first year, providing $995 million in additional capital to the Gavi Alliance to purchase and deliver vaccines throughout the world’s poorest countries. To date IFFIm has increased the number of donor governments to nine and raised more than $5 billion in total to advance Gavi’s immunization work. 1
challenges we face in the 21st century. Estimates currently set the investment need for the emerging “Sustainable Development Goals” continued, page 6
“
We need a broad set of scalable investment solutions that together advance the agenda.”
(SDGs) between US $3.5-$4.5 trillion per year. Accounting for the approximate US $1.4 trillion in existing sources of funding, there still remains a US $2.5 trillion shortfall. In this case, innovation is not just for innovation’s sake. The call for more innovative financial solutions for the world’s most pressing social, economic, and environmental problems goes well beyond a contemporary buzzword. There are no easy solutions, however. For perspective, scaling current innovative finance flows 100x would only result in approximately US $1 trillion – well below the $2.5 trillion target. There is no silver bullet solution that will get us to the investment levels we need. Rather, we need a broad set of scalable investment solutions that together advance the agenda. This will take commitment, resources and the elusive combination of ingredients that make innovation happen: creativity, risk-taking,
GREEN BONDS: Green bonds raise money from fixed income investors to support lending for eligible projects designed to mitigate climate change or help those affected by it. The World Bank first launched green bonds in 2008, which gave investors concerned with climate change the opportunity to invest in sustainable infrastructure projects. Estimates placed the total volume of green bonds around US $40 billion at the end of 2014, with issuances not only from development finance institutions but also institutions like Bank of America.
UNITAID: UNITAID is a public sector-driven micro-levy on airline tickets that has been implemented across nine countries to create a new, large, and stable funding source for supporting public health initiatives. Since 2006, UNITAID has successfully raised US $2 billion to address HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria via the World Health Organization (WHO) by implementing a small tax on select airline tickets. 2
CATASTROPHE (CAT) BONDS: A catastrophe bond is an insurance linked security in the form of a bond that allows issuers (which are mostly governments) to insure against catastrophic events such as hurricanes or earthquakes in a quicker,
patience, and collaboration. References: 1. IFFIm, http://www.iffim.org; 2. UNITAID, http://www.unitaid.eu; 3. World Bank, http://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/catastrophe-bonds-international-community-can-facilitate-development-innovative-risk-management; Center for Global Development, http://www.cgdev.org/blog/can-and-cant-cat-bonds; 4. Harvard Kennedy School, “Advance Market Commitments for Vaccines Against Neglected Diseases: Estimating Costs and Effectiveness”; Gavi, http://www.gavi.org; 5. CGAP Microfinance Gateway, World Food Programme R4, Swiss Re R4 Initiative; 6. CGAP Microfinance Gateway, http://www.microfinancegateway.org/;
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
7
more cost effective way than through traditional insurance. These bonds rely on parametric triggers, specifying predefined values (e.g., magnitude of an earthquake or wind speed during a hurricane) that generate a payout from the insurance policy. If the disaster occurs, investors in the bond forgo the principle to the borrower (e.g., the government), who can use the cash immediately to address the crisis and begin recovery. Traditionally, insurance and reinsurance companies from advanced economies issue CAT bonds, but developing countries are more vulnerable to the effects of catastrophes and have fewer resources to prepare and respond to disasters. Since 2009, groups like the World Bank and African Risk Capacity have developed similar products for developing countries. 3
ADVANCE MARKET COMMITMENTS: Advance market commitments (AMCs) guarantee a viable market for private sector companies to provide goods in industries and geographies not traditionally served by the private sector. Current AMCs consist of contracts between donors (i.e., governments and foundations) and pharmaceutical companies that set a guaranteed price for drugs or vaccines for undeserved diseases (e.g., HIV/AIDS, malaria, or tuberculosis) and populations. Donors agree to a minimum price per person up to a certain amount of individuals immunized, and in return, companies commit to providing the vaccine at an affordable price to developing markets. While the market size for these drugs is quite large in developing countries, the ability to pay for vaccines remains out of reach for those who need them most. AMCs lower the cost of vaccines, and experts estimate that the sheer volume of drugs purchased through AMCs creates revenues for pharmaceutical companies comparable to investments they traditionally make in commercial products in established markets.4
MICROINSURANCE: Low-income households have few, if any options, for protecting themselves against risks such as illness, crop failure or loss of assets like livestock, as traditional insurance products are generally too expensive for them to access. Microinsurance addresses this challenge by offering coverage for poor individuals in areas such as health and agriculture through innovative distribution channels and by pooling and transferring risk to the capital markets. In 2011, The Rockefeller Foundation together with the World Food Programme, Oxfam America, and SwissRe launched the R4 Rural Resilience Initiative in Senegal and Ethiopia to decrease food and income insecurity associated with climate-related shocks. Poor farmers and rural households in these countries pay for insurance by working on local climate adaptation measures – often in the form of crop irrigation or forestry projects. R4 reaches more than 26,000 smallholder farmers by employing an integrated approach with tools like resource management, insurance, microcredit, and savings. Estimates place the microinsurance market place at more than US $40 billion and growing.5
MICROFINANCE: Perhaps one of the best known examples of innovative finance, microfinance is generally a source of very small loans for low-income people. Over time, it has evolved to include a range of financial products, including savings and insurance. Microfinance has become a source of credit for those at the base of the pyramid where they may otherwise be seen as too risky an investment from a traditional bank. Microfinance institutions now span a range of organizational structures from small non-profit organizations to large commercial banks.6
SOVEREIGN RISK POOLS: Sovereign risk pools provide governments with a tool to minimize the impact of natural disasters on their economies. It provides countries with immediate access to capital to begin recovery and reconstruction efforts. An early example of such an insurance tool is the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF), a multi-country, disaster risk insurance facility established by the World Bank in 2006. The CCRIF provides liquidity coverage for 16 Caribbean states in the case of major natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes and earthquakes). 7
from the sale of (RED) products go to the Global Fund to Fight AID, Tuberculosis and Malaria. (RED) is the Global Fund’s largest donor, having provided more than US $275 million to date.8
PAY FOR SUCCESS:
USE-RELATED MARKETING:
Pay for Success contracts engage stakeholders from philanthropy, non-profits, and the private sector to finance outcomes-based social interventions. These contracts are often known as “Social Impact Bonds” and leverage philanthropic and private sector financing to provide up-front funding for a non-profit service provider to achieve a specific social or environmental impact measure for a target population.
The late 2000’s saw an increase in use- or causerelated marketing. This type of marketing generally links a for-profit company with a non-profit for mutual benefit. Often times this results in new streams of revenue for the non-profit or direct goods and services to developing countries. One of the best known examples of this is Product (RED).
The government agrees to pay back the loan providers only if the agreed-upon impact targets are met. Pay for Success projects have been developed all over the world, and in both developed and developing countries. In the US alone, the government has allocated nearly US $200 million for new PFS contracts.9
(RED) was founded by U2’s Bono in 2006 to raise awareness and money to combat HIV/AIDS in Africa. Companies like Nike, American Express, Apple, Starbucks and many others have created products that are part of (RED). Revenue generated
7. Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada, “Project profile: Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility for Central America - Honduras ; Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, http://www.gfdrr.org/sites/gfdrr.org/files/documents/DRFI_CCRIF_Jan11.pdf; CCRIF, http://www.gfdrr.org/sites/gfdrr.org/files/documents/DRFI_CCRIF_Jan11.pdf; 8. Product (RED), http://www.red.org; 9. White House, OMB, Paying for Success, https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/factsheet/paying-for-success
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
9
Guiding the Conversation
This report follows three main areas discussed at Bellagio:
SPURRING THE INNOVATION AGENDA
DESIGNING AND ENABLING SUCCESS
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
Discussion explored these two overarching questions: What must be done to spur the global innovation agenda?
What are opportunities for action? •
•
•
Which sectors and/or financing approaches
What are the barriers to innovation? What can
are ripe for innovation? Which high-impact
be done to enhance the quality and scale of
solutions are ready for further testing for
innovative finance solutions?
proof-of-concept? What research is needed?
How can we better coordinate public and private-sector efforts?
•
Are there existing mechanisms prepared to scale organically and/or across new sectors/ problem areas? What can be done to catalyze the development of these solutions?
Creating a Framework
Spurring the Innovation Agenda While the topic of innovative finance is not new, the forthcoming Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the third International Conference on Financing for Development recently held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia provide a unique opportunity to reflect on the current state of affairs. In Bellagio, participants assessed the progress of innovative finance to date, identified possible constraints, and explored opportunities for action. While stakeholders throughout the innovative finance ecosystem understand the importance of each of these elements individually, incorporating them into a cohesive strategy that can spur the global innovation agenda has proven more difficult in practice.
What are possible barriers to innovation in financing for development? 1. SILOS There is a need for more ‘connectors’ and partners. Development banks have often played this role – working with civil society, private industry, and government. To be successful in mobilizing private sector capital at scale, there must be more actors who can translate across industries and sectors. 2. UNCERTAIN REVENUE STREAMS The sector needs to move from uncertainty (e.g., ODA levels varying by country and political appetite) to predictability and stability. How might we identify additional, predictable, and sustainable revenue streams? Micro-levies like UNITAID have overcome this barrier in the past. 3. ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS Innovative finance has been generally driven by asset owners, not organizations needing capital.
There are examples of institutions having developed innovative financial mechanisms for funding public health, but the recipients of capital found themselves with structural and organizational barriers to receiving and deploying new funds. 4. LACK OF POLITICAL WILL The political context in developing countries can lead to uncertainty, and there are challenges in finding leaders to champion new ideas. Specifically, a lack of political will to drive innovations forward can kill or stall projects, and the policy and regulatory environment may not be favorable for financial innovation. This can be particularly true for innovations in financing disaster preparedness projects versus disaster response efforts. 5. LARGE AND UNCERTAIN RISKS There have been too few efforts to quantify risk and mitigate risk, particularly in emerging and frontier markets. An inefficient use of subsidies, unclear governance structures, and the lack of data to determine a track record can lead to uncertainty and difficulties in properly assessing and pricing risk.
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
11
Opportunities to overcome potential challenges
1. DONOR-LED DEVELOPMENT Donors (philanthropy and government) can lead the imperative for developing more innovative finance mechanisms, creating stronger incentives for traditional investment banks and financial advisory firms to address social and environmental issues. 2. LONG TERM APPROACH Donors should be encouraged to adopt a longer-term time horizon for capital allocations beyond yearly ODA cycles. 3. COLLABORATION New forums for collaboration with ideas from the private sector should be encouraged. 4. CAPACITY BUILDING Implementing organizations will need to build their internal capacity to effectively receive and deploy larger amounts of capital. 5. LOOKING AHEAD Sovereign government should take an ex ante instead of an ex post approach to protecting against natural disasters and public health crises. 6. FOCUS ON DATA Existing data must be analyzed and additional data should be generated through new modeling initiatives in order to create new methods for assessing risk.
Creating a Framework
Designing And Enabling Success If the international community is to be successful in unlocking private sector capital as an important means of achieving the SDGs, there must be a better, broader understanding of the key design elements and enabling success factors for innovative financing mechanisms:
Design Elements
Enabling Factors
Simplicity
Common Organizing Framework
Usefulness
Champions
Market Reality
Supportive Regulatory Environment
Standardization Potential
Collaboration Across Sectors
Evidence Base
Opportunism Fuzzy Mandate
Design Elements SIMPLICITY Successful innovative finance efforts keep the complexity of the mechanism “in the middle,” meaning that complicated deal structures affect neither the investor nor consumer user experience. Many Pay for Success models employ this design principle, where a third-party financial intermediary manages the complexity of the investment, and the investor and service provider focus on their core business activities. USEFULNESS The mechanism must be grounded in an actual need. For instance, the R4 Rural Resilience Initiative responds to smallholder farmers’ need to protect against potential droughts or other
major disasters that lead to low crop yields and therefore negatively affecting their livelihoods. MARKET REALITY Things that go against mainstream finance don’t work. Incentives must be aligned with investor or funder needs and expectations. Green bonds, for example, use an existing financial product that investors are already familiar with to steer capital toward environmentally sustainable projects. STANDARDIZATION POTENTIAL Facilitate replicability by building in processes and procedures that can be standardized, thereby reducing transaction costs as quickly as possible and increasing profit margins over time.
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
13
“ Innovative finance can’t happen in a vacuum.” EVIDENCE BASE While the financial tool itself may be innovative, the intervention it is financing should have a strong evidence base. The project should have clearly defined targets and work toward measurable outcomes.
Enabling Factors COMMON ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK Early successes in innovative finance built on the Millennium Development Goals, providing a common framework that galvanized support around the globe. The new Sustainable Development Goals can serve as a strong foundation for a new wave of innovative finance mechanisms. CHAMPIONS It is unlikely innovative finance will be successful in a vacuum. Finding the right champion(s) can make or break a project. There must be institutional and political will to ensure success. SUPPORTIVE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Innovative finance may operate at the boundaries of the existing regulatory framework. In some cases, a new blueprint for public policy
interventions may be required to make the mechanism work. COLLABORATION ACROSS TEAMS AND SECTORS There are diverse stakeholders involved in financing for development. Innovative finance often requires new forms of collaboration between private sector corporations, institutional investors, governments, and the philanthropic and nonprofit sector. OPPORTUNISM Find where the social or environmental need and market inefficiencies intersect, and stay alert to when new partners and champions arise. It is important to be nimble and open to new opportunities as they emerge. THE FUZZY MANDATE Being innovative may require one to operate in an environment where the path forward is unclear. Optimizing success may mean remaining comfortable with ambiguity and staying open to experimentation.
After considering many of the potential opportunities outlined in the previous pages, Bellagio participants identified three major themes to take forward: • Creating and leveraging micro-levies • Creating risk transfer solutions to allow capital to flow • More effectively leveraging public credit
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
15
Opportunities
Exploring Opportunities for Action Taken together, the barriers, opportunities, and key success factors provide a useful framework to explore ways for approaching innovative finance. At Bellagio, participants used this framework to examine a variety of themes for mobilizing large-scale capital, specifically focusing on these three areas: 1. micro-levies and public policy; 2. risk transfer solutions; and 3. more effectively leveraging public credit. CREATING AND LEVERAGING MICRO-LEVIES TO COUPLE WITH PRIVATE CAPITAL As UNITAID has shown, global micro-levies can provide new, sustainable sources of revenue to fund international development efforts. While UNITAID was a small tax on airline tickets that funded public health projects, the new UnitLife levy provides income from extractive industries (e.g., oil, uranium, gold) and will support efforts to combat malnutrition. Some estimate this new
innovative governance structures for the launch of such micro-taxes. For instance, revenue generated from UNITAID has not been invested in capital markets, and therefore, the maximum financial or social impacts of the levy may not have been fully realized. While the public officials governing these funds are often risk averse, they should examine opportunities to grow and leverage these funds more effectively. ORIGINATING RISK IN UNDER-SERVED MARKETS
levy will provide an additional $200 million in funding per year.
Recognizing that there have been tremendous technological innovations that allow for
As the international community considers new
better flows of information, thereby lowering
types of micro-levies, there may be interesting
transaction costs and increasing the ability to
ways to leverage these new pools of money to
create new products and services, there is a clear
increase their impact even more. In order to
need to better originate risk in under-served
do this, governing bodies will need to show a
markets and organize demand for existing credit
greater appetite for risk, which may also require
and insurance products.
16 Improved risk origination can happen at a variety
products that work ex ante, it is imperative to
of levels, including the macro (or sovereign risk)
analyze relevant data (wind speed on the ground
level, the traditional (or household and corporate)
during a hurricane, for example) to operationalize
level, or the micro (base of the pyramid) level. At
the parametric trigger. The good news is that the
the macro level, there is opportunity to create
majority of this type of data already exists and
more regional, sovereign risk pools. For instance,
is not proprietary – but someone has to spend
the African Risk Capacity (ARC) uses satellite data
time and resources to analyze it before assessing
to quantify the impact of severe droughts, which
the associated risk. ARC and R4 are benefiting
then triggers insurance payouts to participating
from this approach, with their leadership having
countries, and R4 Rural Resilience Initiative
realized it costs much less to manage risk than it
provides innovative ways for smallholder farmers
does to provide relief in a crisis.
to obtain insurance while also contributing to climate adaptation measures.
There are opportunities to learn from or replicate these models to create new insurance products
Still, assessing and pricing risk can prove difficult
that address new social and environmental
in practice, and there should be increased efforts
risks – providing a much-needed safety net for
to combine innovations in technology and data
low-income households in developing countries.
analysis to evaluate risk. For example, many
Such potential insurance products may also be
contemporary insurance products available in
uncorrelated to other asset classes and provide
developing countries contain enduring subsidies
institutional investors a new opportunity to
from government and philanthropy. On one
diversify their portfolios and contribute to global
hand, subsidies can play a catalytic effect for
resilience.
new products to be developed and enter the market. On the other, enduring subsidies have
At the traditional and micro-levels, innovative
serious implications for the solution’s commercial
insurance products can also help support and
viability and long-term success for the issuer,
protect NGOs that provide critical services to
as they do not generally allow the buyers the
the poor and most vulnerable. Similarly, insuring
chance to see the policy’s real premium (i.e., the
financial intermediaries that serve BOP clients
appropriately priced risk).
could unlock and provide more capital to lowincome households by transferring the risk to the
Data and technology can also help governments
broader capital markets.
and relief organizations take an ex ante approach to disaster preparedness and response rather
Insurance products can benefit BOP financial
than an ex post one. To create insurance
intermediaries by allowing them to expand
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
17 services and products that build capacity
have followed suit by issuing their own green
in local enterprises as well as at the
bonds.
individual household level. Similarly, with stronger protections against public health
In addition to expanding to new areas for
catastrophes and natural disasters, NGOs
thematic bonds, issuers of public credit
can spend more money on resiliency efforts
should take more risk with their capital to
instead of response and treatment.
innovate and attract private sector actors.
MORE EFFECTIVELY LEVERAGING PUBLIC CREDIT
Multilateral development banks (MDBs) often
Development banks generally play the necessary ‘connector’ role among investors, development finance institutions (DFIs), philanthropy, and government. Welldesigned projects utilize a mix of capital and overcome cultural barriers and translation issues across sectors. While development banks have played that important role in the past, there are opportunities for other actors to step in as intermediaries and drive collaborative projects forward in the future. Still, the role of DFIs in innovative finance is critically important. For example, DFIs have the opportunity to leverage existing sources of public credit more effectively as one option for attracting more private capital for public good. Current financing mechanisms, such as Green Bonds, provide a strong model for how public credit can eventually influence more mainstream financial institutions. Since the World Bank first developed green bonds in 2008, mainstream financial institutions
indirectly compete with private sector capital instead of convening diverse financing agents and encouraging participation in deals. Development banks have the ability to be anchor investors in more deals, signaling credibility to institutional investors – a concept dubbed the “MDB Halo Effect.” MDBs have a clear opportunity to take the lead here; however, the process for doing business with MDBs is sometimes slow and opaque, especially for private sector companies accustomed to moving at a quicker pace. While MDBs often conduct an “Ease of Doing Business” report on their partners, what might it look like to have a better understanding of what it’s like to do business with the MDBs themselves? Such a report could focus on how development finance institutions operate with their high value capital, support internal innovation and to what extent they focus on intentionally cultivating deals that allow for more effective private sector participation.
Conclusion
The international community has a prime opportunity to integrate innovative finance into the core development agenda. In September 2015, the United Nations agreed on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), setting the primary international development targets for the next fifteen years. A failure to live up to these commitments will have unprecedented costs to human wellbeing and planetary health.
These goals come with a hefty price tag. The
by exploring opportunities for more micro-
UN estimates that it will cost US $3.9 trillion
levies. However, as discussed, the revenue
per year to achieve the SDGs in developing
stream itself is not necessarily the innovation.
countries alone, yet current estimates place
One-to-one leverage is no leverage at all, and
both public and private funding at only US
creativity and an increased appetite for risk
$1.4 trillion—an annual shortfall of $2.5
will be critical to maximize the impact of this
trillion.
source of capital.
While funding alone will not achieve
Private companies, non-profits, and
the SDGs, filling this gap should be an
entrepreneurs should explore ways to
international priority and will require
create risk transfer solutions, specifically like
tremendous innovation in financing for
sovereign risk pools such as the Caribbean
development. As outlined in this report,
Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility and
the successes over the last 10-15 years show
African Risk Capacity. Additional areas to
promise, but there is a still a long way to go.
explore include organizing demand at the base of the pyramid and activating relief
This report describes the key elements
organizations and financial intermediaries to
for success and a potential path forward.
explore how to transfer the risk they generally
One possibility is to determine additional,
take on to the capital markets.
sustainable, and predictable revenue streams
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
19
“ Filling this gap should be an international
priority, and will require tremendous innovation.” Finally, innovators should explore ways to more
health outbreaks and epidemics, and even a
effectively leverage public credit.
green bond coupon that better allows investors to discern the environmental impact of the asset.
Multilateral development banks (MBDs) can increase their impact by leading more deals to
These efforts require collaboration with
signal the credibility of projects to institutional
private and public sector partners, embraces
investors. For example, the World Bank’s “City
experimentation, risk-taking, and a long-term
Creditworthiness Initiative” aims to address
time horizon.
the demand for climate-smart infrastructure by helping cities improve their financial
Through these efforts, the goal is to develop
performance and secure private investment for
solutions that can help ensure that the
such projects. MDBs can also build their internal
development commitments made in 2015 are
capacity and create more transparent processes
successful.
that better engage the private sector. Participants at Bellagio are moving forward with many of the recommendations in this report, including the new UnitLife micro-levy on extractive industries, more risk origination in under-served markets with life insurance products for base of the pyramid consumers in India, exploring risk transfer solutions for public
Attendees
Nick Ashburn, Wharton Social Impact Initiative
Shari Berenbach, United States African Development Foundation
Lorenzo Bernasconi, The Rockefeller Foundation
David Bresch, Swiss Re
Adam Connaker, The Rockefeller Foundation
Philippe Douste-Blazy, United Nations
Christopher EgertonWarburton, Lions Head Global Partners
Robert Filipp, Innovative Finance Foundation
Brinda Ganguly, The Rockefeller Foundation
Abyd Karrnali, Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Georgia Levenson Keohane, New America
Katherine Klein, Wharton Social Impact Initiative
Kenneth G. Lay, (formerly) World Bank
Saadia Madsbjerg, The Rockefeller Foundation
John W. McArthur, Brookings Institution
Sucharita Mukherjee IFMR Holdings
Bellagio Report: Bringing Innovation Back to Innovative Finance
Jeremy Rogers Big Society Capital
Lakshmi Venkatachalam, Asia Development Bank
David Wood, Initiative for Responsible Investment, Harvard Kennedy School
Glenn Yago Milken Institute, Financial Innovation Lab
Organizers
For more than 100 years, The Rockefeller Foundation’s mission has been to promote the well-being of humanity throughout the world. Today, The Rockefeller Foundation pursues this mission through dual goals: advancing inclusive economies that expand opportunities for more broadly shared prosperity, and building resilience by helping people, communities and institutions prepare for, withstand, and emerge stronger from acute shocks and chronic stresses. To achieve these goals, The Rockefeller Foundation works at the intersection of four focus areas—advance health, revalue ecosystems, secure livelihoods, and transform cities—to address the root causes of emerging challenges and create systemic change. Together with partners and grantees, The Rockefeller Foundation strives to catalyze and scale transformative innovations, create unlikely partnerships that span sectors, and take risks others cannot—or will not. To learn more, please visit www.rockefellerfoundation.org.
Wharton Social Impact Initiative leverages Wharton’s strengths to develop and promote business strategies for a better world. We use core business competencies to spur strategic and systems-level positive social impact in Philadelphia and around the globe. Through research, consulting, hands-on training, and outreach, we are advancing the science and practice of business social impact. Established in 2010, our interdisciplinary work explores the tools and strategies of impact investing and finance, impact entrepreneurship, and strategic corporate social impact. To learn more, visit socialimpact.wharton.upenn.edu to learn more.