The White Book by WowJustWow

the

WHITE BOOK

TH E WH ITE BOOK a manifesto for the european diaspor a by ROBERT S. OCULUS III

second edition mmxv

THE THREE TRUTHS

1. white people exist 2. white people have the right to exist 3. white people have the right to exist as white people

He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see. -- John 9:25

The White Code I I am a White person, a member of the European Diaspora. I am proud to be a White person. I will never be ashamed of my race. I will neither acknowledge any form of racial guilt nor accept responsibility for deeds not committed by me or mine. II I will work and provide for myself and my own. I will offer aid from my own hand to those whom I deem worthy of aid, and to none other. I will never take the food out of my own childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s mouths to feed the children of others. III I will associate with whomever I please, and will respect the freedom of association of all men. IV I will acknowledge the natural inequalities which exist between men. While recognizing the brotherhood of all men in the eyes of God, I will never accept any affirmative action taken contrary to this reality. V I will judge as I see fit the intentions and character of those unknown to me based upon reason and experience. VI I will fear no man. I will forcefully defend myself and my own from insult, intimidation, and aggression.

VII I will boldly enjoy the privileges I have earned, and will offer privileges to those I deem worthy, and to none other. VIII I will behave in a modest and civilized fashion at all times, and I will expect the same courtesy from others, showing respect to all men in the degree that respect is shown to me. IX I will love my neighbor as myself, and will never stoop to hatred of any man or group of men, including my enemies. I will strive to live in peace with all men. X I will protect the peace and order of my home, my community, my workplace, and my surroundings. I will never tolerate misbehavior, crime, and violence. XI I will defend the peoples of the European Diaspora with word and deed, and zealously oppose anyone who acts to harm White people on account of their race. XII I will conserve and protect the genetic and cultural patrimony of the peoples of the European Diaspora. I will promote the continued existence of White people. I will marry a White spouse and have White children. I will raise and cultivate our children in the White tradition. I affirm that White people exist, that White people have the right to exist, and that White people have the right to exist as White people. I pledge allegiance to the peoples of the European Diaspora, and to the traditions, families, and property of White people wherever they live.

AUTHOR’S NOTE This is a book of love: love of one’s own, not hatred of the other. It is intended to bring hope, not to fuel a sense of hopelessness. It is meant to bring people together, not to drive them apart. This is not a book of ideology. It offers no utopian program as a solution to the problems of the world. It does not invite the reader to join any organization, march on any picket line, sign any petition, lobby for any legislation, or vote for any party, any platform, or any candidate for political office. The aim of this book is simply this: to help people to see the truth — not ideological truth, not political truth, but the simple truth of everyday life. Its purpose is to help people peer through the veil of unreality which has been imposed upon them, and to admit that what they experience in the real world every day of the week is true. This is a book of love, for it is only through love that we will all be saved. It is my hope that this little white book will serve to make this truth plain, and to point it out to those who can See. — R.S.O. America Winter A.D. 2012

PROLOG: THE UNSPEAKABLE TRUTH “I am a white person.” Can you say these words? Can you admit that you are white? Can you admit that white people exist? If not, that’s okay. Many white people can’t. Because for the past fifty years white people have been most carefully trained to avoid seeing the truth — the Unspeakable Truth that can end the world. The Unspeakable Truth is the knowledge of what we are. But what are we? Who are you? You are a human being, of course — but not just any human being. You are a person — a white person. You are a member of the white race. Say it out loud: “I am a human being, but I am not just any human being. I am a white person. I am a member of the white race.” Can’t do it, can you? Do these words scare you? Do you feel like a bad person just for reading them? Do you think I am evil for writing them down, or even thinking them? It’s okay if you do. You have been trained to feel that way. You have been trained not only to hate what you are, but to deny that you even exist. Insulting, isn’t it? You have been trained like Dr. Pavlov’s dog. You have been conditioned like a lab rat. But you aren’t a dog. You aren’t a rat. You aren’t a bad person. You are a victim of psychological warfare, that’s all. By reading this far, you have begun your struggle to break free of the effects of this psychological warfare. By turning this page, you have made your first strike in the war against the people who have conditioned you to ignore what anyone with

open eyes can clearly See. But do you have the guts to go on? Do you have the courage to speak the words you have been taught never to say out loud? Go ahead. Try it. Say it in your softest voice, whisper it if you must, but say it: “I am a human being, but I am not just any human being. I am a white person. I am a member of the white race.” See? The world didn’t come to an end. Now read on.

I. DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? The late Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. had a dream: a world where men would be judged by content of character rather than by color of skin. It was, perhaps, a noble dream. Certainly it inspired the people of the world. And, for a few lovely months back during those days of hope and change, it even seemed like a dream that could come true. But reality seldom lives up to any dream. And the reality of today is that the Dream has become a nightmare. A. ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA Once upon a time America was a clean, safe, basically happy place to live and work. Once upon a time in America kids could play outside all day and walk to school and roam the neighborhood on their bikes without fear of harm. Once upon a time in America a family could go to a movie or a concert or a shopping mall without the slightest thought for their safety. Once upon a time in America a person could leave his or her house and car unlocked day and night without a care. Once upon a time in America people could walk the streets of their city day and night without fear of being roughed up, robbed, or raped by a gang of street thugs. We can’t do any of those things any more. Why? The answer is simple: because once upon a time in America, society was strictly segregated on the basis of race. The clean, safe, happy America was a world where, by and large, blacks lived separately from whites and people of other races. Once that separation was no more, the troubles began. Don’t flinch. Don’t look away. Face the truth. The end of segregation was the end of the America of Once Upon a Time.

It’s not that black people are evil or somehow less than human. It’s just that in general black people are radically different from, and incompatible with, white people. Black people can “act white”, of course – that is, they can behave in ways typical of white culture. But it’s an act, as any black person will tell you. Black people have their own unique culture, a culture that has emerged from the black nation just as white culture is the natural product of the white nation. And this black culture follows black people wherever they go. [1] And two cultures cannot coexist in peace within the same country. Once the U.S. federal government began using its guns to force whites and blacks to associate, once racial integration became mandated by law, the clash between whites and white culture and blacks and black culture began — and the era of clean, safe, happy America ended. Ugly, isn’t it? Want to turn away, don’t you? Me, too. But we dare not. Reality must be faced. The facts don’t lie. And like it or not, admit it or not, you know in your heart of hearts that forced racial integration ruined the America of Once Upon a Time. You know deep in your heart that this is a country at war. B. THE WAR ON WHITE PEOPLE You may not know it, but you are a soldier in a war: the War on White People. But don’t take my word for it. The proof can be found in the pages of the news every day. The War on White People begins with negation. For the past fifty years, white people have been told that they do not exist — that is, that white people as such do not exist. We have been taught that race is a social construct, and that there are no

“white people”. (Until a scapegoat is needed, of course. Then we magically exist again.) The war is being fought with condemnation. Whites have been relentlessly propagandized to believe that they have no right to exist. All the best brains agree that White people (whom, as you will recall, do not exist) are by nature a race of oppressors, a people characterized by genocide and the brutal enslavement of Africans and others. Although we are told that it is wrong to lump together all black people, all Asian people, or all Latino people, the Lords of Diversity have no problem lumping together all white people. We are all haters in their eyes, either knowingly (“racist”) or unknowingly (“white privilege”). We are told that white people are a cancer on the earth, and that the earth will be better off without us. Which brings us to the ultimate goal of the war: our dehumanization. We have been carefully taught that White people have no right to exist as white people. Whiteness, we are told, is repugnant and immoral. For more than fifty years the public has been hammered by propaganda ridiculing white people, white culture, and white identity. Like the black stereotypes of days gone by — the handkerchief-headed Mammy, the shuffling Stepin Fechit — Whites are now stereotyped in every medium. Recognize any of these stock TV/movie characters? • The prissy, socially-inept loser • The sphincter-clenching stiff who can’t dance • The dead-eyed, power-crazed businessman • The inbred, illiterate peckerwood • The champagne-swilling, upper-class twit The Redneck. The Uptight White. The Backslapping Bigot. The Hillbilly. The Nerd. And on and on. These stereotypes are known to all. We white people have been dehumanized. We are now cartoons — caricature buffoons, fit only to be laughed at, exploited, and then thrown away. The anti-white gospel has been pounded into our brains by

schoolteachers, ministers, and political figures for five decades. White people have been the targets of a information war the likes of which Stalin or Mao Zedong could only dream. And we are losing this war. Most white people today (you, for example) reflexively deny their very existence as white people. Most white people today (you, for example) sincerely believe that there is no such thing as the white race. Most white people today hate themselves and react to any positive mention of white identity with a smirk — or a call to the civil rights authorities. For in our world today any suggestion that blacks and whites are not 100% equal in every way, any recognition of the fact that the U.S.A. has pretty much gone to hell since the “liberation” of black people, any criticism of or lack of sensitivity toward a black person or group of black people will result in the use of the Ultimate Weapon against you: a threeword phrase that blacks and their non-black allies use when they want to destroy someone. There is no defense against the Ultimate Weapon. There is no way to counter the Ultimate Weapon. No White person can resist the awful power of this three-word Ultimate Weapon. The three words are: “YOU A RACISS” “Raciss”: Ebonics for “racist”. Being called a “raciss” is the end of the world for the average white person in America today. Most whites will do anything, go to any length, to avoid being thought of as a “raciss”. And what is a “raciss”? In the War on White People, “raciss” means “anything a white person says or does that a given black person or a self-appointed defender of black people doesn’t like”. And, fella, “raciss” are everywhere. In fact, you yourself are almost certainly a raciss! Let’s say you’re a businessman with some hiring to do. Would you hire a more-qualified white guy instead of a less qualified black guy? If so, then guess what? You a raciss.

Or let’s say you’re a fan of classical music. Do you dislike rap music? If so, you a raciss. In fact, there’s almost nothing a white person can say or do that isn’t raciss. Have a picture of Jesus with white skin in your house? You a raciss. Root for the team with the White quarterback? You a raciss. Live in a white neighborhood? You a raciss. Live in a black neighborhood? You a raciss. Make a black person feel uncomfortable? You a raciss. Talk radio listener? You a raciss. Country music fan? You a raciss. High score on a test? You a raciss. White cop? You a raciss. Cowboy hat? You a raciss. Wear khaki pants? You a raciss. Refuse to build a store in the ghetto? You a raciss. Build a store in the ghetto? You a raciss. Use the word “ghetto” in a conversation? You a raciss. Out-jump a black man on the basketball court? You a raciss. Good swimmer? You a raciss. Baseball fan? You a raciss. Against public transportation? You a raciss. Ride on public transportation? You a raciss. Flee the ghetto for the suburbs? You a raciss. Move back to the ghetto from the suburbs? You a raciss. Accuse a black athlete of murdering two people after finding their blood on him? You a raciss. Condemn a black athlete for running a dogfighting ring? You a raciss. Shoot a black kid in the guts as he’s doing his best to beat your brains out against a concrete curb? You a raciss. Shoot a black kid in the head after he’s robbed a store and tried to grab your gun? You a raciss. White folks, in case you haven’t figured it out yet: no matter what you do, think, say, or believe, if you are white, you a raciss. If you want a picture of the future, imagine an angry voice, screaming you a raciss in your face — forever. It is by means of such racist witch-hunting that white people have been “put in their place”. Like South African blacks under apartheid, or American blacks during Jim Crow, we whites are now compelled to shuffle along meekly with our eyes on the ground. Under the new “Crow Jim”, whites may be harassed, hunted, held back, and held accountable for various crimes, solely on account of our race. Under Crow Jim, we are raped,

robbed, and killed in the streets of our own cities. Under Crow Jim, our labor and enterprise are ruthlessly exploited for the benefit of those who control us. We are the new slaves, toiling away on the plantation for the profit of our masters. And, like a plantation field hand, any white person who dares resist, who dasses to lift his hand against the new massa — even in self-defense — is gonna git whooped. Any white who fails to “keep to his place” today is censured, ostracized, and denounced before the public as a racist and a hater — usually by his fellow whites. This campaign of anti-white hatred is beyond politics. This is the deliberate and systematic destruction of a people, a culture, an identity — white people, white culture, white identity. There is a word for that sort of destruction. That word is genocide. And so the nightmare continues. Thanks to Dr. King’s Dream, the world has been turned upside down. The white man is now the “nigger” — a subhuman, fit only to be ridiculed, scapegoated, exploited, hated, and exterminated. And exterminated we will be, unless we fight. C. THE REAL ENEMY Have you ever wondered who really runs America, England, Canada, Australia? Whoever it may be, it certainly isn’t the assortment of clowns, real-estate hustlers, and used-car salesmen we “elect” to “represent” us. No one in their right mind believes that voting changes anything. Proof? Well, let’s look at illegal immigration. Over the last four decades, millions of Mexicans and other invaders have entered this country without benefit of passport. Many have remained here illegally. Now, think back: when, exactly, were you asked to vote on letting them in? During which session of Congress did We The People decide to allow this invasion?

Or how about the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Second Gulf War, the Afghanistan thing, or whatever military intervention that may happen to be going on as you read this book. Did our representatives in Congress declare war on these countries as our Constitution requires? Were you given the chance to support or oppose such a declaration of war? Or let’s take the various laws and regulations giving preferences to blacks and other non-whites in hiring and college funding. Did you vote for that? Or how about sub-prime mortgage lending to blacks and other non-whites by the various federal mortgage guarantors. Did you vote for that? Did you vote for the bailouts of the big Wall Street banks? Did you vote to cancel the space program? Did you vote in favor of continuing U.S. membership in NATO? You didn’t? Well, somebody did. Somebody let all those Mexicans in. Somebody decided they should stay here. Somebody signed off on Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. Somebody decided that blacks and other non-whites were more worthy of employment than you, more deserving of tuition dollars than your kid. Somebody handed all that mortgage money out to people who couldn’t have qualified for a real mortgage in a million years. Somebody covered the losses of the Banks Too Big To Fail. Somebody canceled the space program. Somebody keeps us in NATO year after year, decade after decade after the USSR has disappeared. Somebody is running things. But it ain’t us. Who, then? Think: who do you see on the news when the Big Decisions are made? Who gets appointed to one federal post after another? Who moves effortlessly between their various perches at the peaks of business, government, and academia? Ever notice that it’s mostly the same people? It’s almost always some smooth-talking, urbane member of the media, academic, government, institutional, or corporate elite. They decide what’s news. They run the universities. They administer the laws. They lobby the lawmakers. They control the money.

And they are almost all lily white liberals. This is the new ruling class. Beginning in the 1960s, a sea change in the American political structure began. The old, Roosevelt-era Liberal American elite, an elite that for all its faults was rooted in what one might call the natural aristocracy of this country, was gradually supplanted by a new, ideological, bi-coastal power elite. While the history and scope of this elite are too complex to treat of in this book, conservative writer William S. Lind describes the takeover this way: America has been conquered by the same force that earlier took over Russia, China, Germany and Italy. That force is ideology. [It] is in fact cultural Marxism – Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It goes back at least to the 1920s and the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923, in Germany, a group of Marxists founded... the Institute of Social Research (later known as the Frankfurt School). One of its founders, George Lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the question, “Who shall save us from Western Civilization?” The Frankfurt School gained profound influence in American universities after many of its leading lights fled to the United States in the 1930s... The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create “Critical Theory” and “deconstruction.” These in turn greatly influenced education theory, and through institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call “Political Correctness.” ... Political Correctness, shares with classical Marxism the vision of a “classless society,” i.e., a society not merely of equal opportunity, but equal condition. Since that vision contradicts human nature – because people are different, they end up unequal, regardless of the starting point – society will not accord with it unless forced. So, under both variants of Marxism, it is forced.... The second major parallel is that both... have single-factor

explanations of history. Classical Marxism argues that all of history was determined by ownership of the means of production. Cultural Marxism says that history is wholly explained by which groups – defined by sex, race, and sexual normality or abnormality – have power over which other groups. The third parallel is that both varieties of Marxism declare certain groups virtuous and others evil a priori, that is, without regard for the actual behavior of individuals. Classical Marxism defines workers and peasants as virtuous and the bourgeoisie (the middle class) and other owners of capital as evil. Cultural Marxism defines blacks, Hispanics, Feminist women, homosexuals and [other] minority groups as virtuous and white men as evil... The fourth parallel is in means: expropriation. Economic Marxists... expropriated the property of the bourgeoisie and handed it to the state... Cultural Marxists, when they gain power... lay penalties on white men and others who disagree with them and give privileges to the groups they favor... Finally, both varieties of Marxists employ a method of analysis designed to show the correctness of their ideology... For cultural Marxists, the analysis is linguistic: deconstruction... [a phony analysis] that twist[s] the evidence to fit preordained conclusions... Political Correctness... has taken over both political parties... and is enforced by many laws and government regulations. It controls the most powerful element in our culture, the entertainment industry. It dominates...education... It has even captured the higher clergy in many Christian churches. Anyone in the Establishment who departs from its dictates swiftly ceases to be a member of the Establishment. [2] So whom are we fighting? Who is our enemy in this War on White People? Know this, white man: Despite what you may think and feel, black people are not the Enemy. That’s what the real Enemy wants you to think. Black people are what they are, but they are neither clever enough nor numerous enough to plan and

carry out a war on white people. If they were, they wouldn’t have needed the power of the Federal Entity — it long ago ceased to be a legitimate government — in Washington, D.C. to overturn the Jim Crow laws of the pre-Dream era. Besides, the real Enemy dismisses race as a fiction and hates the idea of single-race neighborhoods, schools and institutions. Black people laugh at the idea of race as a fiction, and most would probably prefer living in black-only neighborhoods and enjoying black-owned schools, businesses, and other institutions if they could. The Jews aren’t the Enemy, either. Yes, there are a lot of Jews among the ranks of the Enemy, but they are not there because of their Jewishness, but in spite of it. Real Jews believe in God and small government. After all, from the Persians to the Third Reich to the the Soviet Union, the one thing proven to be most dangerous to the Jew is big, revolutionary government. It is an unpleasant fact, however, that there are more than a few Jews who have been deceived away from the bourgeois values and assimilationist attitudes of America’s earliest Jewish population and are actively working to destroy white populations and the remnants of Christian culture. Broadly speaking, this later wave of Jewish immigrants is largely Eastern European in origin, has little use for Gentiles or members of the middle class, and tends to cluster in their own communities rather than blend in with the white American majority. It is this group of Jews, whom we might call “Red Jews”, that has served as the intellectual, artistic, and financial vanguard of the revolution that created the America in which we now live – and fomented many other revolutions around the world. From Karl Marx to Sigmund Freud, from the Frankfurt School to Hollywood, the ranks of those who have destroyed Western civilization are, sadly, filled with these errant Red Jews. From the halls of academe to the corridors of government to the streets of the deep South during the so-called civil rights movement, these politically radical, mostly East Coast Red

Jews became both the nucleus of and the inspiration for the cohort of Disingenuous White Liberals that has destroyed the America we knew. These Red Jews are significantly more liberal than other American populations. It is a simple fact of history, for example, that Jews were disproportionately involved in the so-called civil rights movement of the 1960s, the familydestroying “women’s liberation” movement, the campaign for legal contraception, abortion, and the normalization of sodomy. Red Jews of this sort have been especially active in the movement to destroy white racial identity and pathologize white racial consciousness in the United States [3]. But why? Noted Jewish author and radio host Dennis Prager analyzes this curious phenomenon at length: The most frequently asked question I receive from non-Jews about Jews is, why are Jews so liberal? The question is entirely legitimate since Jews (outside of Israel) are indeed overwhelmingly liberal and disproportionately left of liberal as well. For example, other than blacks, no American group votes so lopsidedly for the Democratic Party. And the question is further sharpened given that traditional Jewish values are not leftist. That is why the more religiously involved the Jew, the less likely he is to be on the Left. The old saw, “There are two types of Jews — those who believe Judaism is social justice and those who know Hebrew,” contains more than a kernel of truth. In no order of importance, here are six reasons: 1. Judaism is indeed preoccupied with social justice (as well as with holiness and personal morality), and many Jews believe that the only way to achieve a just society is through leftist policies. 2. More than any other major religion, Judaism has always been preoccupied with this world. The (secular) Encyclopedia Judaica begins its entry on “Afterlife” by noting that “Judaism has always affirmed belief in an afterlife.” But the preoccupation of Judaism has been making this world a better place. That

is why the Torah (the Five Books of Moses) is largely silent about the afterlife; and it is preoccupied with rejecting ancient Egyptian values. That value system was centered on the afterlife — its bible was the Book of the Dead, and its greatest monuments, the pyramids, were tombs. 3. Most Jews are frightened by anything that connotes the right wing — such as the words “right-wing” and “conservative.” Especially since the Holocaust, they think that threats to their security emanate from the Right only. (It is pointless to argue that Nazism stood for National Socialism and therefore was really a leftist ideology. Whether that is theoretically accurate doesn’t matter; nearly everyone regards the Nazis as far Right, and, therefore, Jews fear the Right.) The fact that the Jews’ best friends today are conservatives and the fact that the Left is the home of most of the Jews’ enemies outside of the Muslim world have made little impact on [liberal] Jews’ psyches. 4. Liberal Jews fear most religion. They identify religion — especially fundamentalist religion and especially Christianity — with anti-Semitism. Jews are taught from birth about the horrors of the Holocaust, and of nearly 2,000 years of European, meaning Christian, anti-Semitism. They therefore tend to fear Christianity and believe that secularism guarantees their physical security. 5. Despite their secularism, Jews may be the most religious ethnic group in the world. The problem is that their religion is rarely Judaism; rather it is every “ism” of the Left. These include liberalism, socialism, feminism, Marxism and environmentalism. Jews involved in these movements believe in them with the same ideological fervor and same suspension of critical reason with which many religious people believe in their religion. It is therefore usually as hard to shake a liberal Jew’s belief in the Left and in the Democratic Party as it is to shake an evangelical Christian’s belief in Christianity. The big difference, however, is that the Christian believer acknowledges his Christianity is a belief, whereas the believer in liberalism views his belief as entirely the product of rational inquiry.

The Jews’ religious fervor emanates from the origins of the Jewish people as a religious people elected by God to help guide humanity to a better future. Of course, the original intent was to bring humanity to ethical monotheism, God-based universal moral standards, not to secular liberalism or to feminism or to socialism. Leftist Jews have simply secularized their religious calling. 6. Liberal Jews fear nationalism. The birth of nationalism in Europe planted the secular seeds of the Holocaust (religious seeds had been planted by some early and medieval Church teachings and reinforced by Martin Luther). European nationalists welcomed all national identities except the Jews’. That is a major reason so many Jews identify primarily as “world citizens”; they have contempt for nationalism and believe that strong national identities, even in America, will exclude them. Just as liberal Jews fear a resurgent Christianity despite the fact that contemporary Christians are the Jews’ best friends, leftist Jews fear American nationalism despite the fact that Americans who believe in American exceptionalism are far more pro-Jewish and pro-Israel than leftist Americans. But most leftist Jews so abhor nationalism, they don’t even like the Jews’ nationalism (Zionism). If you believe that leftist ideas and policies are good for America and for the world, then you are particularly pleased to know how deeply Jews — with their moral passion, intellectual energies and abilities, and financial clout — are involved with the Left. If, on the other hand, you believe that the Left is morally confused and largely a destructive force in America and the world, then the Jews’ disproportionate involvement on the Left is nothing less than a tragedy — for the world and especially for the Jews. [4] The good news for both white people and for Jews is that the era of the Red Jew is coming to a close. Ironically, they have fallen victim to the same decadent behaviors they have encouraged in whites: they have contracepted, aborted, and

intermarried themselves almost out of existence. They have abandoned the God of their fathers for the golden calf of money and power. They have cast down the tablets of Law for the imperative tikkun olam, the Luciferian urge to bring their own version of order out of chaos. And by abandoning both the Law and Him Who has given it, they have abandoned their culture. All that’s left of the great Jewish tradition is a thin veneer of Chinese take-out, show-biz Yiddish, and standup comedy. They are finished. But not all Jews are Red. A recent survey of Orthodox Jews in New York reveals that 62 percent of them believe that America is headed in the wrong direction. Greenfield reveals the future: “New York City Jews are suddenly polling as more conservative than Protestants and only moderately more liberal than Catholics.” [5] A Jew isn’t a White person, of course. Jews hace their own interests, some of which differ from the interests of white people. But many Jews have many interests in common with whites as well, and that could mean a whole new era of WhiteJewish relations. We whites ought to be reaching out to such Jews, as well as to white Mormons and to members of other non-Christian religions, finding common cause where we can and working together to reach our common goals. Don’t be decieved by the small minoroty of Hebrew Supremacists among the Jews. The number of Jews who take being Chosen to mean that they are superior to all other peoples is miniscule, and they do not enjoy the approval of most Jews, even the most liberal. For example, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the head of the Shas political party in Israel and the former chief rabbi said in 2010 that “Goyim [gentiles] were born only to serve us [Jews]. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel....Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created.” [6] This is not a mainstream Jewish idea. Even the Anti-

Defamation League (ADL), that example par excellence of Hebrew liberalism, considered rabbi Yosef’s ideas unacceptable, citing them as contributing “to an atmosphere of hatred and a global trend of intolerance.” “It is disturbing to see any religious leader, and particularly Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, use their podium to preach such hateful and divisive ideas,” said ADL chief (and liberal, anti-White ideologue) Abraham H. Foxman [7]. When even Abe Foxman condemns you, it’s time to consider that the ol’ kippah may be screwed on a little too tightly. It’s sad. Many whites hate Jews and blacks – but what’s even sadder is the fact that liberal Jews, like “ghetto” blacks, have no one but themselves to blame for white hatred. It can’t be denied that there are plenty of black faces and Jewish names among the folks most involved in the War on White People, Red Jews are not a conspiracy, of course, but because they share the same goals and attitudes they act like a hostile group of aliens. They do not identify with the white and Christian majorities in Western nations. They openly oppose the Christian character of the West. They work to harm whites as a group. But can we blame them? After all, we whites gave the Red Jews the power they have. As we did with blacks, we handed the Red Jews the keys and told them we didn’t want to own the shop any more. We stopped believing in ourselves, in our culture, in our Jesus. We brought them over from their homelands. We opened our businesses, our neighborhoods, our media, our politics, our social organizations to them. We failed to maintain the traditional, separation between le monde Juïve and our Gentile world. How can we condemn Leftist Jews for cashing the blank check we wrote them? You can call me an anti-Semite if you like, but the fact is that I’m not saying that all Jews are evil. The very idea of an “evil race” is stupid. Like the individual members of every other race, a given individual Jewish person is just as capable of good or evil as any other sort of person.

But like the members of every other race, Jews, too, think of themselves both as individuals and as a group. As the late (Jewish by birth) Catholic paleoconservative scholar Lawrence Auster pointed out, Jews regard themselves on a communal basis, as “a people, a religion”. And while it is true that the Jewish communists such as Karl Marx had nothing to do with the Jewish religion and denied their own Jewish ethnicity, Auster continued, it is also true that they were and are members of the self-defined Jewish people. As such, theorized Auster, many secular liberal Jews shared “the understandable obsession” of their fellow Jews with the persecution of their people by Christians. And it is this preoccupation with anti-Semitic persecution, wrote Auster, that is responsible for the disproportionate representation of Jews within the ranks of the global revolutionary project. In Auster’s view, the goal of the secular leftist Jews, is to create, via Communism, “a Single Mankind in which all nations and ethnicities, including the Jewish ethnicity, would disappear, and Jews would no longer be seen as different, and the persecution of them would cease” [8]. Given these facts, it is hardly surprising that some Whites think that putting up with the Jews isn’t worth the cost. It’s easier to just hate them. But hating the Jews, like hating black people, or hating our own people, or hating anybody whomsoever, is stupid and counterproductive. Don’t make the hate mistake. While many on the Right simply write off the Jews as a race of amoral, mercenary swindlers (the “rootless cosmopolitan” class enemy of the Stalinist USSR of the 1950s), a deeper look into history and a glance at common sense tell us otherwise. There simply is no “International Jewish Conspiracy”. Are Jews clannish, insular, nepotistic? Yes — and so are everyone else. Jews help Jews, sure — but the members of every race or ethnic group do that as well. Blacks prefer to hire and trade with blacks. Latinos prefer Latinos in business

and in social life. We whites naturally think first of other whites when we engage in our daily dealings. Jews dominate the entertainment and news media because of nepotism, not because of any nefarious conspiracy. One might as well believe that a covert cabal of Southeast Asians runs the convenience store industry. I’ll say it again: there is no International Jewish Conspiracy. There is no Zionist Occupational Government. Yes, Jews tend to be smart and well-connected, and as such are going to be overrepresented within the ranks of the Enemy, but there are no Elders of Zion, meeting around a table in London plotting the downfall of the goyim. Neither will you find the members of the Zionist Occupational Government of America standing together on line for a pound of sliced tongue at Zabar’s. That sort of comic-book conspiracy theory is unworthy of a thinking man. And as for the idea of a black conspiracy? The mere thought that the Nation of Islam and/or the New Black Panther Party might be readying their members to overthrow white America — that’s a joke. Those fez-wearing clowns and leather-jacket beret-jockeys couldn’t overthrow a shoe store. Conspiracy theorizing dies by the numbers. Blacks make up only about 13% of the United States’ population. There are only 13 million Jews in the whole world. Face it: there just aren’t enough blacks — or enough Jews — in the world to pull off a conspiracy. As Whites, we must not be led down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theory in pursuit of the cause of our current troubles. Blaming “the other” for all of one’s problems is pathetic. Do you ever get sick of hearing Jews on TV blaming you for anti-Semitism? Do you ever get tired of seeing some black guy on TV blaming you for his people’s problems? You do? Physician, heal thyself. When you blame the problems of the White race on “the blacks” or “the Jews”, you are doing the same thing they do: avoiding responsibility for your own problems.

Just as the Jews and the blacks and every other racial group are as a whole responsible for their peoples’ failings, we whites must step up and take responsibility for our own. The Jews are not the enemy. Jews don’t make us watch filthy movies or moronic TV shows. Jews don’t make us divorce our spouses or abort our children or contracept our future into non-existence. Jews don’t take the money out of our pockets and make us buy crap we don’t need. No, we do all those things with our own little powder-white paws – and then when it all blows up in our faces we point the finger at the Jews. As if we don’t have free will! As if our Lord and His every saint haven’t warned us of the wages of sin! Friends, when I say we have to See the truth in order to survive I don’t just mean seeing the motes in the eyes of the dead-hearted schmucks that run this country. I don’t just mean seeing the truth about black and Jewish and liberal behavior. I mean taking a hard, honest look in the mirror and admitting to what we See. Face it: white, Christian America is rotten – and we let it rot. We let our standards slide. We abandoned our race, our culture, our creed, and our collective conscience. All the blacks and Jews in the world couldn’t have done this to us. We did it to ourselves. And that’s why hatred isn’t the way to go. If we hate the Other, we hate the wrong people. If we hate ourselves, we have no future. Hatred leads nowhere and solves nothing. And that’s why becoming a skinhead, a Klansman, or a Nazi hurts instead of helps the white cause. Ordinary, nextdoor-neighbor-type white people cannot relate to, and will not associate with, hateful people. Everyday white people can detect the sour smell of burning crosses and jackboot polish a mile away, and if they smell it on you any chance you might have had to open their eyes will disappear. How does that help white people? If you go the Jew-hating route, the black-hating route, the anybody-hating route, your days of being taken seriously by

other white people are at an end – and with them any good you might do for the cause of White survival. I repeat: Hatred is not the answer. Hatred is negative and cannot serve as the basis for the revival of the white and Christian civilization we want. Only love, love of our own kind, can be a firm foundation for our cause. We must learn to love ourselves as a people before we can make any progress. When (Jewish) poet Leonard Cohen says “Love’s the only engine of survival” he’s not just making the words rhyme. Hatred solves nothing, builds nothing, grows nothing good. Only love can create, construct, and grow. Only by encouraging love of our own kind, rather than hatred of others, are we going to win this war. If we are to win the War on White People, we have to awaken the everyday white person to the truth and convince them to make common cause with other whites. We have to teach them to love white people. The solution to the black question, the Jewish question, is not hatred, and it most certainly is not persecution or violence. We will examine the answers to these questions later in this book. But if “the Jews” and “the blacks” aren’t the Enemy, then who is? It’s easier to define them by what they are not. The real Enemy is not “the blacks”, “the Jews”, the communists, the bankers, the Rockefeller family, the Ford Foundation, the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Gray Aliens, or any of those other false targets set up to distract us. Members of these groups (excepting perhaps the Aliens) can be found among the ranks of the Enemy, true, but you must never forget that the real enemy is the power elite behind the black radicals, behind those Jews who hate and fear whites and Christians, behind the communists, behind the bankers, the Rockefeller family, the Ford Foundation, the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations, and – for all

we know — behind the Gray Aliens. The real Enemy in the War on White People is the Devil himself, and the cabal of atheistic, materialist cultural Marxists given power by him to manipulate the global economy, the political systems of the world, and the news and entertainment media in order to bend reality to fit his infernal will. This cabal, which we may call the Global Luciferian Revolution (or simply “the Revolution”), is not a monolithic conspiracy, but is rather an alliance of like-minded individuals and groups, a monster with many names and many faces, but with one purpose: to realize the promise of Lucifer – that is, to use technology and brute force to assume godlike power over existence itself, and to create by their own will a Heaven on Earth. A full examination of the Revolution lies outside the scope of this book. The important thing to remember is that blacks and Jews and politicians and international bankers as such are not the Enemy. The Enemy is not united by DNA or culture but by an idea – the Luciferian idea. The Luciferian idea is like a virus. It can infect the souls of people of any race or color. And those infected with it share a single goal: apotheosis. They wish to become gods, defining reality itself by their will, overthrowing God and His natural law and creating a heaven on earth in which they, the new gods, will reign supreme. And they will have no other gods before them. Which is why they know that white people must not be allowed to think of themselves as a group. Single men with no loyalty to anything except their own desires are animals – herd animals: easily manipulated, molded, mastered. But a man who believes himself to be part of a distinct breed, a breed apart, cannot be herded. He will resist any intimidation, any pain, for the sake of his tribe, his family, his God. The Enemy knows this. This is why they want to create a “post-racial” world. They know that must breed mankind into

a single, docile, coffee-colored herd if they are to become the lords of creation. They know that as long as loyalty to anything other than the Revolution remains, they cannot reign supreme. In order to win the war against God, the Enemy has to destroy all loyalty to nation, to family, to people. In order to win, they must smash all flags, all human bonds, and all races — first the white race, then all the others. And when you need to smash something, you pick up a hammer. D. BLACK-RUN AMERICA “If I had a hammer…” the old song goes, “I’d hammer out love between my brothers and my sisters, all over this land.” Dr. King’s Dream is a hammer. But it is a sledgehammer, and one that has been used since the 1950s to smash the old America into pieces — in the name of love, freedom, and justice, of course. Who held that hammer? Again, it wasn’t the blacks as such, nor the Jews. There weren’t enough of them around. No, the arm holding that hammer is white — the hand of the Revolution that has slowly but surely overthrown the American elite over the course of the past two centuries. But even this power elite could not impose its will on the country by its own might. It required an ideological army to enforce its edicts on Flyover Country — an Oberkapo of white Americans to keep the masses in line. And the Baby Boomers were there to provide that army. These politically-radicalized, status-driven children of the postwar Affluent Society were used by the Revolution’s intellectual vanguard to form the shock troops of their takeover. These people, and their intellectual and spiritual offspring among younger people, are the Disingenuous White Liberals (DWL): that class of mostly-upper-middle-class white people, Revolutionary in ideology, motivated by white guilt,

and utterly adept at cloaking their own fear and dislike of black people behind a mantle of self-righteous Liberalism, “that rare breed of white person who speaks a big game about hating whiteness; saving... every non-white person on the planet; helping destroy the achievement gap between Blacks and whites by becoming a crusading white pedagogue; and by being a champion of diversity.” [9] Disingenuous White Liberals’ “love” of black people is in reality nothing more than a symptom of their chronic white guilt. The leaders are mostly Baby Boomers, to whom being Cool is everything. Like all Boomers, they live in fear of being thought of as common. They and their younger followers are those journalist David Brooks’ “bourgeois bohemians” – “socially liberal, well-educated, predominately white, upper middle-class voters... clustered largely in expensive urban centers, along the coasts, around universities and high-tech regions” [10]. Ever wonder why so many of the same white people who bitch about racism and champion the benefits of diversity tend to live as far from “diversity” as they can get? That’s disingenuousness. The DWL knows very well what black people are really like. That’s why his kids go to snow-white private schools instead of to the “vibrant, diverse” public schools they all support so adamantly. “[H]igher-educated whites, regardless of their income, are more likely than lesseducated whites to judge a school’s quality and base their school choice on its racial composition” [11]. DWLs love diversity, as long as it’s not too diverse in their own neighborhoods. That’s why Joe and Jane NPR are bailing out of diverse cities like Los Angeles and Atlanta and moving to cities that have huge populations of [fellow] disingenuous white people – cities like Portland. “Portland, Oregon is, of course, near the top of any list of Stuff White People Like. It has it all: environmental restrictions on suburban development, trams, liberal social attitudes, bicycle trails, awareness, an upscale population, microbreweries, sterility, and so much

more. Not surprisingly, white people like Portland.”[12] (The population of Portland is 75% white.) The Disingenuous White Liberal isn’t really interested in helping black people. He thinks of himself as a better class of person, and his primary interest is in demonstrating his superiority over other white people – that is, over you. The typical DWL is an insecure social climber who lives in fear of being thought of as uncool. From his lordly manor in snowwhite North Honkyboro, the DWL assumes the mantle of the saintly protector of the black man in order to show other DWLs he’s not one of the lite-beer drinking, foam-hat-wearing, big-bellied peckerwoods he hates so much. The new power elite had a hammer, all right: the BabyBoomer DWL army. Using this army, they overran every social and political institution in America in the 1960s and ‘70s. And once they had smashed the old, white-dominated political and social order, the DWLs were used to put the pieces back together into their new America: Black-Run America. Despite its name, however, this new Black-Run America (BRA) is not an America where black people run the show. The DWLs know well from historical example what happens when blacks overthrow whites and take control of a country. Haiti, Zimbabwe, the Congo, Kenya, and the Republic of South Africa are what happens. Each was a civilized and prosperous country while under white control. Each disintegrated into murder, hunger, and chaos when whites turned the reins of state over to blacks. Instead, Black-Run America is an America where the full power of the State and of the news and entertainment media is wielded by Disingenuous White Liberals ostensibly on behalf of black people. From the Abolitionists to the Republican Party, from John Brown to John F. Kennedy, from the Disingenuous White and Jewish Carpetbaggers of the 1860s to the Disingenuous White and Jewish “freedom riders” of the 1960s, the Liberal elite in this country have waged war on their fellow Whites, all seemingly for the sake of the poor, downtrodden

Negro. In the name of “justice for black people”, the DWLs have recreated America. Instead of the society we knew, a society which despite its faults was without doubt the most prosperous, most productive society ever to exist for both whites and blacks, they have built “the Great Society” envisioned by President Lyndon Baines Johnson. This “great” society of justice and peace is a society • where Martin Luther King, Jr. is honored with a national holiday, but not George Washington • where the existence of race is ferociously denied and labeled a “social construct,” but where “disparate impact” is used as a litmus test to assess and prosecute “discriminatory” employment practices • where the U.S. military worries that the armed forces are “too White” and discriminates within its own ranks “to promote diversity” • where 35 percent of Blacks live off the EBT card which is paid for by the White taxpayer • where universities create vast “diversity” and “multicultural” bureaucracies as they raise tuition and cut courses in the classics • where black people get federally-subsidized housing vouchers, where they get welfare checks, where they get Medicaid, where they get free government cell phones, where they get energy assistance, where they get special food money allotments, where they get the good-everywhere swipe cards, where the Federal Entity squanders billions of dollars to tear down blighted ghettos and to create “weatherized” green homes for Blacks to “stimulate” the economy • where every hotel, restaurant, department store, and private business is required by federal law to cater to Blacks • where restrictive covenants are illegal and housing discrimination is illegal and whites have no legal ability to preserve the character of their neighborhoods and businesses • where every public school in America is racially integrated

by federal law • where government contracts are used as a way to promote favored non-white groups • where police departments and fire departments routinely discriminate against whites to promote Blacks and other nonwhites • where there are “hate crime” laws which require states to keep track of “hate crime statistics” and which impose tougher sentences on those who are prosecuted under these “bias crimes” • where the worst possible thing you can be is a “racist” • where the Catholic, Protestant, and Mormon churches have all suddenly discovered that “racism” is a sin • where the Federal Entity squanders billions of dollars every year on programs intended to give non-white children a “head start” in education • where journalists systematically fail to provide the racial details of shocking crimes and/or selectively ignore or promote crimes to advance their agenda of portraying Blacks and other non-whites as victims • where the wrong racial comment or the wrong breach of racial etiquette can end your career even if you are a powerful politician or industry leader • where a comic book character’s race can be routinely changed from white to non-white • where every collegiate and professional sports team has been forcibly integrated and where simply participating as a white Christian athlete on the national stage becomes a cross you must bear • where a news story about a non-white criminal who assaults a white man who defends himself is turned by Hollywood into a movie about a Hispanic who beats up two skinheads to protect an innocent African-American passenger from racist violence • where the white middle class is taxed by the Federal Entity to the point where it limits its own birthrate for the

government can redistribute their wealth to subsidize the Black Undertow which is responsible for most of the criminal violence in our society • where the black ghetto class is allowed to destroy towns, cities, counties and major metropolitan areas — and where drawing attention to this is considered more shocking and outrageous than the violence committed by the actual criminals who have ruined the cities • where “diversity” and “multiculturalism” are universally celebrated, but where unrelenting war is waged against the Confederate flag • where the immigration laws have been reformed for the explicit purpose of transforming America into a Third World country • where “whiteness” itself is suspect, illegitimate, immoral, uncool and unjust • where the technology industry is accused of being “too White” and apologizes for its lack of “diversity” • where the Mainstream Media casually remarks that Iowa and New Hampshire are “too white” to hold the first presidential primaries in the nation • where psychotic drug users, schoolyard race gangs, and black women making clumsy false charges of rape can be taken seriously as plausible civil rights martyrs • where a “civil rights activist” can be paid over $300,000 dollars a year for giving lectures about “white privilege” • where white people are forced to conform and censor their thoughts and pretend that their own personal experiences with blacks support the dogma of racial equality • where veritable mountains of taxpayer dollars have been squandered on housing projects, healthcare, food, welfare, and integrated schools for blacks in pursuit of the El Dorado of racial equality • where a scientist as distinguished as James Watson, the discoverer of the structure of DNA, can lose his position at Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory for making politically incorrect

observations about the average intelligence of blacks • where free inquiry and science itself has become subordinated as handmaidens to the cause of radical egalitarianism and where obvious scientific frauds are taken as seriously by the establishment as Trofim Lysenko was in the Soviet Union • where trial and error and experience is not considered a valid path to truth or a compelling argument against the a priori assumption of racial equality • which loudly decries “prejudice” and “stereotypes,” but which casually stereotypes and stigmatizes and pathologizes white males in popular culture • where a positive sense of white racial identity is culturally verboten, but where every other race is encouraged to celebrate and revel in its own non-white racial identity • where some 30,000 white women are raped every year by Blacks, and where this fact is regarded as unfit for political discussion • where even hardcore libertarian politicians must swallow their individual pride and proclaim Martin Luther King, Jr. — the man who led the movement which resulted in the greatest expansion of central state power in American history — a hero • where powerful American corporations like Pepsico shower racial shakedown artists with millions of dollars • where literally everything from religion to morality to culture to science to the political system to the capitalist economy has been hijacked, reconstructed, and subordinated since the year 1965 to the ideal of promoting blacks and other non-whites over Whites, and where everything from the definition of justice and marriage to the nature of reality to the meaning of liberty and equality, all in service of the radical utopian project of uplifting and promoting blacks to “equality” with whites • where every aspect of the nation is based on the fundamental premise that “White America” is wicked, reactionary, immoral, unjust, and illegitimate, and something

best tossed aside into the dustbin of history, as we plunge forward into a multicultural utopia. [13] But Black-Run America is a fake. It is just a pose. In reality, Black-Run America has nothing to do with helping black people. After all, BRA has existed for fifty years, and America’s blacks are in worse shape than ever. White liberals don’t give a damn about black people. BlackRun America’s real purpose is to benefit Disingenuous White Liberals, the Revolution, and no one else. The War on White People is only the latest battle in the eternal struggle between those who adore God and His laws and those who follow the promise of Lucifer and seek to become gods themselves. This Revolution is the true instigator of the War on White People. The Revolution is the arm. The DWLs and their Black-Run America are the hammer. This arm and hammer is our real Enemy. And the Enemy’s goal is a world without you. II. A WORLD WITHOUT YOU A. WHITE GENOCIDE The United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) defines genocide as a number of specific acts “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”. (Note the terms used: “national, ethnical, racial or religious” groups. Even the UN admits that race is real, that ethnicity is real. So much for the idea of race as a social construct!) According to the UN, the crime of genocide is committed when some person or group of persons kills members of the targeted population, causes serious bodily or mental harm to members of the targeted population, deliberately inflicts conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of

the target population in whole or in part, imposes measures intended to prevent births within the targeted population, and/or transfers the children of the targeted population to another group. The War on White People satisfies every one of these criteria. White children are transferred into the midst of hostile black populations every day. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s called public school. White women are encouraged to use contraception, sterilize themselves, abort their unborn children, and mate with nonwhites in order to prevent white children from being born. We are ethnically cleansed from our cities and neighborhoods. We are robbed, raped, beaten, and terrorized in the streets. And we are killed in great numbers every year by black criminals for no reason other than the color of our skin. Black Run-America is openly and explicitly dedicated to the elimination of the White racial group in this country. Black-Run America is white genocide. Yet imagine what would happen if some race besides whites were being targeted for elimination by the powers that be. Take black people as an example. According to the United States Bureau of Justice Statistics, blacks in the United States commit violent crime more frequently than members of other racial groups. Only 13% of Americans are black, but this 13% commits at least 35% of the rapes and sexual assaults in America. In other words, blacks commit rapes and sexual assault at about 5 times the rate of whites and Hispanics combined. [14] Now, what if somebody said that the only way to end the problem of black crime was to get rid of black people? What if this somebody wanted to flood the black-majority parts of the United States with white people in order to breed blacks out of existence and end the black majorities in those areas? What if this somebody openly promoted intermarriage between blacks and others in order to reduce the number of black people in the world? Wouldnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t that be anti-black? Of course it would!

Wouldn’t that be racist? Of course it would! Or imagine if somebody said that the only way to end the chaos in the Holy Land was to get rid of Jews. What if this somebody wanted to flood Israel with non-Jewish immigrants in order to eliminate the Jewish majority there? What if this somebody openly advocated intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews in order to gradually eliminate the Jewish population in Israel? Wouldn’t that be anti-Semitic? Of course it would! Wouldn’t that be racist? Of course it would! You’d call such a person a bigot. You’d say that they were trying to destroy the black race. You’d say that they were trying to destroy the Jewish race. You’d say they were advocating genocide. And you’d be right. Yet this sort of genocide is exactly what “anti-racists” around the world are advocating for white people. And the weird thing is that most of these so-called antiracists are white people themselves. It can’t be racial/ethnic majorities in general that these self-hating whites want destroyed. They only ever talk about eliminating white majorities. They never talk about flooding Japan or the Congo with immigrants of other races in order to “solve the problem of racism” in those countries. They never fantasize about the day when the Vietnamese are bred out of existence by means of mixed-race marriages. These self-hating whites only want to see the end of their own kind. Madness.

B. “WHITE PRIVILEGE” You hear a lot about White Privilege these days. According to BRA, we whites live in a paradise of privilege: our every wish fulfilled, our way to success smoothed by the color of our skin. If you are white in the United States, so the story goes, almost everyone in a position of power or influence looks like you, giving you a stacked-deck advantage in everything from the workings of the justice system to employment. All pure bunk, of course. The people in America who are in positions of power or influence may look like you, Mr. And Mrs. Six-Pack, but they are most assuredly not like you — and they definitely aren’t giving you a stacked-deck advantage in any venue. Quite the contrary: the white liberal elites hate you and everything you stand for. To the Disingenuous White Liberals who control Black-Run America, the average NASCAR-watching, working-class white isn’t even a human being. To them you are merely one sheep in the herd of uneducated, quasi-literate religious fanatics that they fleece. To them you are a barbarian, unwashed, unlettered, and obsessed with guns, stock car racing, and country music. Far from being privileged, white Americans in Black-Run America are openly discriminated against in countless ways, ways that reverse the worst excesses of Jim Crow: Whites are passed over for jobs thanks to affirmative action. No Whites Need Apply! White neighborhoods are “blacklined” – that is, they are busted by “fair housing” laws. Meanwhile, in most black neighborhoods the motto is “Honky, don’t let the sun set on your head in this ‘hood.” White parents are forced to pay for the public schools their own children can no longer safely attend, while at the same time also paying to educate their children privately – and doing both on a reduced income resulting from the distortion of

the job market by federal affirmative action laws. Black-Run America stands in the schoolhouse door now. White parents of young adults send their children to college, where they are brainwashed into hating their own kind thanks to “black studies” and other anti-white curricula. White people are forced to pay for minority grant programs in everything from business to education to mortgage lending – grants for which they themselves are ineligible. Call it the new “poll tax”. Whites have been made subject to countless regulations and laws based upon their race, from federal hiring quotas to “hostile environment” lawsuits to “hate crime” laws. Meanwhile, whites must stand by and watch the high school hold a “black prom” – no whites allowed. Up next: separate drinking fountains. And then there is the cry for “reparations”. The idea is that “black slave labor built white America”, therefore whites owe every descendant of those slaves free money (and who knows what other juicy benefits) simply for existing. Pay up, honky! What do white people owe black people? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Black slave labor did not build America. Black slaves were nothing more than livestock used by the owners of the cotton and indigo plantations of the Deep South. (Note: not all slave-owners were white. There were many blacks who owned black slaves as well.) Black slaves did not create a dime of wealth for white America. Labor — free or unfree — does not create wealth; human creativity is the source of all wealth. Labor is merely the tool by which human creativity converts raw materials into valuable goods. White America no more owes its great material prosperity to the labor of slaves than it does to the labor of oxen, donkeys, or horses. Saying that “slaves create wealth” is like saying “John Deere tractors create food”; in each case, it is the driver of the implement, not the implement itself, that creates value. But as a white person in America today, you are defined solely by what you “owe” black people. Your duty to Black-

Run America as defined by the Disingenuous White Liberals includes — but is not limited to — the duty to continue working and paying taxes to support black people and other non-whites; the duty to see your property lose value owing to the criminality of the black and non-white population in your neighborhood; the duty to watch your schools trashed by lowperforming black and non-white students; the duty to serve as a victim of non-white violent crime. And of course the duty to shut up and take it. You deserve to be robbed, raped, and beaten, after all. White people in America today are accountable for the “crimes” of slavery and segregation committed by their ancestirs. Payback is hell, White man! “Privilege”? Over the course of the last half century white people have bent over backwards to give blacks and other nonwhites everything — everything! — they have demanded. And what have we gotten in return? We are “privileged” to pay for the bad behavior of blacks and other non-white people. Call it the Black Tax. This “Black Tax” is paid by White people every day. We pay it in the form of higher state and local tax rates needed to fund the law enforcement and prisons needed to deal with black crime. We pay it in the form of the federal payroll deductions needed to fund the welfare bribes paid to blacks to keep them from rioting. We pay it in the form of financial institutions ruined by federally-mandated sub-prime mortgage lending to blacks who default on their mortgages. We pay for it in the little things: nightmarishlycomplex ghetto-proofed product packaging in our stores; parks we can no longer visit; pay-before-pumping self-serve gas at the local service stations; pro sports ruined by black players playing “shtreet bawl”; movies made unwatchable by hordes of cell-phone using, curse-screeching, fist-fighting black kids in the seats of the theaters; and of course the countless neighborhood, cities, and other communities destroyed by “diversity”. The equity value of White-owned properties that has been wiped out by blacks over the past fifty years alone

qualifies as one of the greatest financial disasters in the history of the world. But the biggest Black Tax we pay is the one we pay in the streets – a tax levied in the form of violence. Blacks have been given permission to intimidate, harass, insult, beat, rob, rape, and murder white people. And if Whitey defends himself, Whitey will soon find out whose side is truly “privileged” by the power structure in America. It’s ironic. In 1955, black people had to sit in the back of the city bus. Today, a white man who values his safety can’t get on a city bus at all. In 1957, white people forced black students to attend racially-segregated public schools. Today, the threat of black violence and misbehavior means white children can’t go to public school. In 1964, black people weren’t permitted to move into certain neighborhoods. Today, white people had better not live in those same neighborhoods if they want to keep breathing. White Privilege, ladies and gentlemen! The trumping-up of the White Privolege charge continues. Over the next several years, we whites may expect to be bombarded by round after round of academic artillery, study after study “proving” that we Whites only win because we cheat. Don’t attempt to fire back. The Enemy has all the big guns – for now. Just lay low and dodge the shrapnel. Why? Because — despite all their clever arguments — everybody knows the real truth about “White Privilege”: that it is pure bunk. And how do they know it? Because the civil rights movement has completely failed to produce equal outcomes between whites and blacks. Anyone who is honest about what he sees and hears every day knows that diversity has been a disaster — and so the Disingenuous White Liberals are going to try to convince you to believe them instead of your own lying eyes. “So-called

‘White Privilege’ studies are just a nebulous way of explaining why black people have yet to succeed as a group,” explains one social critic. “Leftists fully expected that blacks would be able to succeed as soon as they obtained full rights in society. [T]hey haven’t. So to avoid having to admit that blacks are fundamentally different in either biology or cultural values, they have to blame their former oppressors, including those who are fully engrossed in the ideology of cultural Marxism.” Again, seeing is believing. “The theory of white privilege really falls flat on its face when you look at minorities who aren’t cognitively handicapped like blacks are. [Northeastern Asians in America] are doing quite well. [East] Indians are doing quite well... Why shouldn’t they be oppressed...?” [15] The success of nonwhite Asians and nonwhite East Indians despite us mean old white people and our privilege is all the proof anyone with sense needs. There is no such thing as “White Privilege”. What we have instead is White Disadvantage. Whites are disadvantaged because we tend to succeed in life and are punished for doing so. Whites are disadvantaged because we play by the rules and are made fools of when we expect others to do the same. Whites are disadvantaged because we are stupid enough to expect our European culture and values to be comprehensible by those of other races and cultures. As Wilmot Robertson put it, “The most truly disadvantaged are those who are hated for their virtues, not their vices, who insist on playing the game of life with opponents who have long ago abandoned the rules, who stubbornly go on believing that a set of highly sophisticated institutions developed by and for a particular people at a particular point in time and space is operational for all peoples under all circumstances.” [16]. Far from being privileged, we whites carry the invisible backpack of White Disadvantage wherever we go. So don’t be fooled. The next time someone preaches the antiwhite gospel to you, See him as he really is: an advocate for genocide. Picture him or her in the uniform of the SS, or the

Soviet NKVD, or of Oliver Cromwell’s Roundheads – for what he or she wants to do unto you and your kind is precisely what those genocidal groups did unto the Jews, the Kulaks, and the Irish respectively. When an anti-racist says he is against white racists, what he is really against is white civilization. When an anti-racist says she wants an end to white supremacy, know that what she really wants to end is white culture. When an anti-racist tells you he wants to see white power eliminated, realize that what he really wants is to eliminate the white population. (Except for the Disingenuous White Liberal population, of course.) The Disingenuous White Liberals say that want a future without white privilege. What they really want is a future ethnically cleansed of white people. What they really want is a future without you. C. WHITE FLIGHT There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved. – Rev. Jesse Jackson, remarks at a meeting of Operation PUSH, Chicago, Ill., 27 November 1993. Quoted in “Crime: New Frontier - Jesse Jackson Calls It Top Civil-Rights Issue”, Mary A. Johnson, Chicago Sun-Times, 29 November 1993 You’ve heard it all your life. “All cultures are equal!” “People are people!” “The vibrance created by our multicultural society is wonderful!” “Celebrate differences!” “Diversity is our strength!” Snappy sayings all. The Soviet Union’s propaganda

department had a lot of snappy sayings, too. So did Mao’s. So does Fidel Castro’s. And of course there’s North Korea – no one does sloganeering better that Kim & Sons. But all these mind-control mills pale into insignificance next to the massive, unstoppable propaganda machine that is Black-Run America. Since just after World War II, the entire resources of the nation’s political, social, commercial, entertainment, and news industries have been at the disposal of the Disingenuous White Liberals who have seized power in America. What they’ve been selling is racial integration, multiculturalism, miscegenation, and immigration. What they have been selling is Diversity. But even though the Enemy has been selling Diversity on the basis of how great it is, no one in their right mind has been buying it. Diversity doesn’t work. Despite fifty years of positive integration law, despite five decades of books, movies, newspapers, radio programs, and TV shows extolling the virtues of racial integration, America has re-segregated itself. Decades of propaganda and coercion by BRA simply aren’t enough to persuade White America to live around blacks. The great loops of freeways and suburbs surrounding the decaying cores of our once-great cities are testament to this. Diversity doesn’t work. America’s cities are less diverse today than they were during Jim Crow. Americans have seen diversity, and have said “no thanks.” What they have said “yes” to is getting the hell away from diversity. Diversity doesn’t work. We thought we would get a multuicultural wonderland. What we got was the ethnic cleansing of America’s cities. What we got was White Flight. Did you ever notice that the same guys who bang on and on about the wonders of the Rainbow of Diversity almost never live near any “diversity”? Did you ever stop to ask yourself why the pretty little white girls who whinge endlessly about the wonders of the “vibrant” local black community often

live in all-white suburbia, miles away from the “vibrant” black community? Does it ever puzzle you that the same famous writers who make their living rhapsodizing about the “blessings” black people bring to America never seem to move to Detroit, or to Atlanta, or to Gary, Indiana, where the black people actually live? Why is it that the movie stars, pop singers, and best-selling novelists who lecture you about how great it is to have black people living nearby always seem to live in snow-white, exclusive neighborhoods, tony all-white New York apartment buildings, or tiny, lily-white villages in Maine? Well, wonder no more. It’s really quite simple: the main reason is that white people in general – especially anti-racists, progressives, and other Disingenuous White Liberals — will not live around large numbers of black people. Hypocrisy? Of course. But it’s perfectly understandable. No matter how much they support diversity, no matter how much the publicly identify themselves as anti-racists, whites know all too well from hard, personal experience what racial diversity really means. White people aren’t ignorant. They know very well what happens when Team Diversity shows up in their neighborhoods and schools. While most Whites will never consciously acknowledge this – “We’re moving to Honky Heights for the good schools!” — they subconsciously know that black people are trouble, and plan their lives accordingly. This de facto re-segregation – to which we give the cute nickname of “white flight” — is based entirely on the changes wrought by the pathological behavior of black people in America. Why do white people bail the minute the neighborhood gets dark? Why White Flight? It’s not because of ignorance, hatred, or racism. White people leave diversity behind because they want to live in peace. White people know deep down that black people are dangerous — so they move away from them. Proof? The lives of your children. Imagine you, a white parent, letting your teenage daughter use your car one night.

Maybe she’s headed to the bookstore, or to a party, or to her friend’s house. Along the way she becomes lost, or your car breaks down, or she runs out of gas. There she is, alone and stranded on a dark street. Now ask yourself: Would you rather this happen to her in an all-white, working-class neighborhood, or in an all-black working-class neighborhood? Why? You know very well why. You know very well which scenario you would prefer. You just can’t bring yourself to See the truth. Because you have been trained from birth that to See this truth makes you a racist, a hater. Yet you tell yourself that you are not a hater, not a racist. So you avoid the problem. You drive your daughter to her destination yourself, keeping well clear of “sketchy” neighborhoods the entire way. (“Sketchy” is DWL code for “black”.) Proof? Your local shopping mall. Remember when it was clean, bright, safe? Remember when a kid could go read comics at the bookstore while his folks shopped for a new shirt or a pair of shoes? Well, it’s not like that now. The local mall is now more likely a strutting ground for crews of menacing, foul-mouthed black gang-bangers. Violence is a daily reality. Police are everywhere. They have to be. You’d have to be nuts to even bring white kids to such a place, let alone allow them to wander unsupervised. What caused this change at your local mall? What factor has turned the mall from a safe place to shop and stroll to a place of menace? What? You know very well what. You just can’t bring yourself to face the truth. Not out loud, anyway. Because doing so would cost you your friends, your family members, maybe even your job. So you ignore reality, cling to the Dream, and start shopping at the new mall out on the edge of town, where the only gangs

are the crowds of gum-popping, hair-tossing white girls giggling their way across the food court. Proof? Public High, USA. There was once a time when high school in America was a happy, safe place, a good environment in which to learn. Sure, school had its problems back then, but every place has problems. Public High, USA was once the best institution of learning of its kind in the world, a place of ponytailed princesses and pompadoured Romeos — like Rydell High in the movie Grease. But, brother, Public High USA ain’t like Grease anymore. Today, your typical big-city high school is less like a movie musical and more like a state prison — a hell of screeching profanity, racial gangs, casual violence, and classroom chaos. Any parent who sends their ponytailed princess or clean-cut Romeo to such a place is engaging in a particularly sadistic form of child abuse. But why must this be so? What has changed at dear old Public High USA? There were no metal detectors, drug dogs, or police at Public High USA back in the bad old days. There are now. Why? The buildings are still there. The address hasn’t changed. But something is not the same. Something – or somebody — has turned Public High USA into hell. Who? You know very well who. You just can’t bring yourself to face the ugly, bitter truth. So you spend a fortune sending your ponytailed princesses and clean-cut Romeos to a safe, sane, lily-white private school, or else you move to North Honkyville. Good schools out in North Honkyville, don’t you know. Sure, you can ignore the truth. But the truth is the truth whether you acknowledge it or not. Reality is what it is, not what we would wish it to be. And the reality is that the civil rights legislation of the 1960s and 1970s has brought disaster to America. From neighborhood streets to shopping malls to Public High USA, federally-enforced racial integration in

America has been a bloody, painful failure. You can’t blame Whitey for running for the hills. They’re just doing what all sensible people do when they find themselves caught in a war zone. White Flight families are refugees in the War on White People, and they are fleeing for their lives. ___ Imagine, if you will, a person with a grandiose sense of self-worth, a person who lies all the time – a cunning and manipulative person who has no problem “playing” people to get what he wants. He seems to have no guilt over anything he says or does. He seems to have no ability to imagine the feelings of others. He can’t seem to control his impulses or bad behavior. He is irresponsible, preferring to live as a parasite rather than forge his own way in life. As a child he was incapable of getting along with others not like himself, and was badly behaved in both public and private. As a teenager, he used and discarded women like bathroom tissues. As an adult he’s been married three or four times – or not at all. He cannot tolerate “disrespect” from other people in any form, and has no problem exploding into violence if he feels he has been disrespected. He is lazy, has no long-term goals, and his life is a nightmare of chaos, pain, and failure. Now imagine this person blames his failures and suffering on you, or on others, instead of recognizing them as the fruits of his own bad decisions. You recognize this sort of person at once. It’s a description of a typical urban black person in America, right? Actually, no. The sort of person you’ve just imagined is a person who has all the symptoms of Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD), a clinical personality disorder that can be identifed by “...a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood.” In other words, you’ve just imagined a psychopath.

And yet it’s frightening how closely the clinical definition of a psychopath tracks with the kind of behavior we observe in American urban blacks today. The definition of a psychopath, or a person with APD, can be found in the Psychopathic Checklist - Revised (PCL-R). a list of observed behaviors used by clinical psychologists to determine whether or not a given patient displays the behaviors typical of APD. These behaviors include “glib and superficial charm, grandiosity, need for stimulation, pathological lying, conning and manipulating, lack of remorse, callousness, poor behavioral controls, impulsivity, irresponsibility, failure to accept responsibility for one’s own actions”. Sound like any group of people you know? It’s sad to say it, but when looked at objectively, a large number of urban black Americans display the three general traits of psychopathic behavior as defined in the PCL-R: the ability to selfishly use others for personal pleasure without feeling guilty about it; the inability to live a stable, responsible life in the company of other people; and a tendency toward sudden, explosive anger, criminal behavior, and violence for the hell of it. I’m not saying all black people are psychopaths, of course. That would be stupid. Simple observation of reality shows such a claim to be false. But the same honest eyes that can see this must also See that the behavior typical of many urban black people in America today is highly antisocial. Honest observers on the Internet sometimes refer to this as Typical Negro Behavior (TNB). And TNB is incompatible with white society – or with any sort of civilized behavior [17]. The Federal Entity’s crime statistics prove this to be true. The 2010 U.S. Census reveals that 12.6% of Americans are ethnically black, with another 1% of the black population black in combination with some other race. Yet according to the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program, blacks in America committed 53% of homicides that same year. 13% of the

population, 53% of the homicides. In other words, the black murder rate in America is consistently about 8 times higher than the white murder rate, meaning blacks are on average 8 times as likely to commit murder as whites. (Note that for statistical purposes the FBI counts Latinos as whites.) State-by-state statistics reflect the same grim reality. In the state of Washington, Blacks are 3.6 percent of the population, but are responsible for 19 percent of homicide, 12 percent of rape, 31 percent of robbery, 19 percent of aggravated assault, and 16 percent of burglary [18]. In New Jersey, Blacks are 13.7 percent of the population, but are responsible for 68 percent of homicide, 46 percent of rape, 63 percent of robbery, 45 percent of aggravated assault, and 35 percent of burglary [19]. In Georgia, Blacks are 30.2 percent of the population. but are responsible for 50.4 percent of rapes, 85.1 percent of robberies, and 77.5 percent of murders [20]. And at the city level itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s just as bad. Letâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s look at the demographics in the 10 U.S. cities with populations of 100,000 or more with the highest rates of violent crime (i.e. murder, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated assault):. According to the FBI [21], these are: 10. Stockton, Calif. (12.2% black) 9. Baltimore, Md. (63.7% black) 8. Atlanta, Ga.(54% black) 7. Birmingham, Ala.(62.5% black) 6. Little Rock, Ark. (42,1% black) 5. Memphis, Tenn.(62.6% black) 4. Oakland, Calif. (27.3% black) 3. St. Louis, Mo. (49.2% black) 2. Detroit, Mich. (82.7% black) 1. Flint, Mich. (53.27% black) Now, based upon these data, what might we conjecture? We might well conjecture that the amount of violent crime in a given city increases with the percentage of that cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s

population that is black. .In other words, we might guess that the more blacks a city has, the more violent crime it has. One thing can be said for certain, however: blacks are the absolute majority of the population in seven out of the ten most dangerous cities in America. That’s no conjecture. That’s a scientific fact, based upon statistical evidence. So far all we’ve proven is that urban crime and urban black populations are related in some way. But does this prove that blacks commit crime more often than whites? After all, it could be true that even in a city where blacks are more or less the only people that live there (e.g., Detroit) that somebody else is committing those crimes. So let’s look at the facts another way: by looking at who actually commits violent crime in our cities. In St. Louis, Blacks are 49.2 percent of the population, but are responsible for 92 percent of homicide, 78 percent of rape, 93 percent of robbery, 87 percent of aggravated assault, and 82 percent of burglary [22]. In Chicago, where 32.4 percent of the population is black, 75 percent of all murders in the city are committed by blacks, as well as 68 percent of rapes, 85.2 percent of robberies, ad 68 percent of armed assaults. In the City of New York, Blacks are 25.5 percent of the population, but are responsible for 55.5 percent of homicide, 45.5 percent of rape, 63.5 percent of robbery, and 52.8 percent of aggravated assault. And in Atlanta, the City Too Busy To Hate, America’s great AfricanAmerican metropolis, blacks make up 54 percent of the population, but are responsible for 100 percent of homicide, 95 percent of rape, 94 percent of robbery, 84 percent of aggravated assault, and 93 percent of burglary [23]. That’s right — from April 2011 until April 2012, blacks over the age of 17 were responsible for one hundred percent of homicide arrests in Atlanta. But if you are White, Latino, or Asian, you don’t need these statistics to know the truth about black people in America. You know who’s committing the crime in your state, in your city, in your neighborhood. You have learned it the hard way,

from brutal first-hand experience in the halls of school or on the bus ride home from work. You know which parts of town to stay out of. You know which customers to keep an eye on. You know which people to avoid on the streets. You know that black people in general are dangerous to white people and to others. Now of course I’m not saying that each and every black person is dangerous. That would be ridiculous. That claim doesn’t track with reality. Like any member of any race, any given individual black person may be sinister or saintly. But when you compare the Department of Justice statistics concerning the number of violent crimes committed by blacks as a race to the white violent crime rate the truth becomes undeniable. Blacks as a race are many times more likely to commit crimes than whites – especially rape and other violent crimes. The truth is hard, but don’t look away. Don’t make excuses. Don’t dismiss the data because I a raciss. Face reality. And reality is that black people in general bring crime, violence, poverty, and chaos with them wherever they go. Look at Atlanta, Detroit, Birmingham, Baltimore, and other cities where blacks have driven out whites, where blacks hold political power and/or are in the majority. Visit the City of Brotherly Love, scenic Philadelphia, where black thugs drag white passengers from taxicabs and beat them senseless. Play the Knockout Game in St. Louis, where blacks make a sport of sucker-punching random, unsuspecting white people on the street. Enjoy the rich, diverse experience of being pulled from your car and savagely beaten by a mob of blacks on Beat Whitey Night at the state fair [Iowa, Wisconsin State Fairs 2010/2011]. And how about those federal public housing voucher riots, basketball championship riots, and athletic shoe riots our Negro brothers regularly put on? Some fun, huh? (And guess who is to blame for the fantastically disproportionate numbers of blacks who commit violent crime?

That’s right, Whitey: you are. “Youth Violence in African American communities is still considered to be at epidemic proportions,” writes [black] researcher Wesley W. Bryant in the Journal of Black Studies [24]. After investigating “the propensity for violence among African American males ages 14-19 years”, Mr. Bryant concludes that “[t]he traditional risk factors for youth violence [i.e. delinquent friends, poverty, drug use, carrying a weapon etc.] do not account for the disproportionate overrepresentation of African American males.” Mr. Bryant is saying that the reason black males are much more likely to beat, rape or kill you is “internalized racism”. In other words, black people are much more likely to commit violent crimes because white people think that black people are much more likely to commit violent crimes.) See? Black crime is your fault, white man! If you didn’t hate the black man, Quantavius and Dershawn would be performing fetal brain surgery or firing up a nuclear reactor in a research lab tonight instead of sticking a gun in your face at the ATM. And if you don’t believe it, guess what? You a raciss. (“It must be the truth. I read it in the Journal of Black Studies!”) Black crime, black misbehavior, black chaos: these are the reasons why we have White Flight. These are the reasons why even the most liberal, tolerant, diversity-loving Whites keep moving further and further away from the city. White Flight is caused by white people trying to get away from blacks. But let’s be clear: The de facto re-segregation of America called White Flight has not happened because of hate. White people in general do not hate blacks, nor anybody else. White people simply don’t want blacks to steal their bikes, rape their wives, or kill their kids. It’s not a supremacy thing, either. No sane White person

wants to bring back slavery (except for the Muslims, who still practice it). No sane White person wants to march black people into camps or burn them up in ovens. White people by and large just want to work their jobs, watch their baseball games, and live and let live. White people just want to live separately from black people. But they can’t. Because Black-Run America is everywhere. Because the Disingenuous White Liberals who run it won’t permit it. And so, every five years or so, you move your White family twenty miles further from the city. Because what you know from experience about diversity doesn’t match what you were carefully taught. Because the Dr. King’s Dream doesn’t track with reality. Because black people in general cannot live in peace with whites or with other people. (It is important to note that we are speaking in generalities here, not in universals. It is obvious that not all black people exhibit antisocial behaviors. We all know from experience that there are many good and decent black people in our country today. These folks, many of whom are derided by their fellow blacks as “Oreos” or “Uncle Toms”, deserve our friendship, sympathy, and support; they certainly get little from their fellow blacks.) Face the truth. Look at the rings of suburbs surrounding our cities and admit it: Diversity doesn’t work. It just doesn’t work. And you know it. D. THE NOBLE NEGRO OF 1964 And why doesn’t racial and cultural diversity work? Because it can’t work. Because it is, and always was, a con game, a fraud. The Dream was a swindle. The whole civil rights movement of the 1960s was a confidence trick, a classic bait-and-switch scam.

Remember the Noble Negro of 1964? You must have seen him – if not in real life, then in old TV shows, in old books, or in old movies. The Noble Negro of 1964 was the Negro that white America fell in love with. He was dignified, well-dressed, quiet, hard-working, family-oriented, Christian, ambitious, and friendly. He wore a sharp gray suit, a gray fedora hat, and a narrow black tie under his conservative overcoat. He had a respectable job, maybe on the line next to Dad down at the Ford plant or behind the counter at the local supermarket. He had a pretty, modest, sweet-natured Negro wife in a freshlyironed shirtwaist dress. His sons were clean-cut Boy Scouts, his daughters cheerful Girl Scouts. He was the Bait. The Disingenuous White Liberals who hijacked the American elites showed white, Christian America the Noble Negro of 1964 and offered to make him an equal. In return, the DWLs asked only the White man’s dominant position in society. And we took the Bait. We had to. Justice demanded it. What white man with a Christian conscience could look at the Noble Negro of 1964, with his hat and his coat and tie and his job and his pretty wife and his adorable kids, and tell him to sit in the back of the bus? None of us could. It wouldn’t have been Christian. Besides, equality was a deal too good to pass up. Instant moral superiority at a low, low cost! Such a deal! So, like an ignorant hick handing over his money to a threecard monte dealer in Times Square, white America handed over the country to the Disingenuous White Liberals. Not all white Americans, of course. Some of us saw through the scam. People like Governor George Wallace of Alabama, for example. He tried to warn us. They shot him for his trouble. We were warned. We didn’t listen. And as a result we have learned the hard way that the merchandise we were buying was a fake. The Noble Negro of 1964 was a sham, a false front presented

to us by Disingenuous White Liberals. The product we thought we were buying was not the product we actually got. We thought we were buying equality for the Noble Negro of 1964. But the Noble Negro of 1964 was a counterfeit Negro, a Negro created by white people. The black man wore that suit and worked that job and had the wife and kids because he had no choice. The Noble Negro of 1964 had to “act white” in order to prosper in a white country. We bought the DWL’s scam. And as soon as the sale was concluded and the DWLs had the power, came the Switch. The instant the great civil rights legislation of the 1960s came into effect, the Noble Negro of 1964 began to disappear before our eyes. Once white America no longer had the ability to impose its culture on Negro America, to make him wear that suit and tie, the thin veneer of the Noble Negro of 1964 rubbed off to reveal the real black man beneath. The Noble Negro became a “colored person”, then a Black person, then a bold Afro-American brotha or susta, then an empowered AfricanAmerican. And today? They’re back to being Persons of Color again. And the Person of Color we found ourselves living with was nothing like the Noble Negro of 1964. He was, by and large, not dignified, well-dressed, quiet, hard-working, family-oriented, Christian, ambitious, or friendly. Instead, White America found it had “equalized” itself with a black man who was, by and large, vulgar, badly-dressed, deafeningly loud, contemptuous of work, sexually promiscuous, irreligious (or in some cases a Muslim of the real or faux variety), unambitious, and hostile. The new ideal black man wore not a conservative suit and tie but the rig of a pimp or a thug; he demanded monetary “reparations” from white America instead of working; and he had no sweet wife in a shirtwaist dress. Indeed, he had no wife at all. Instead, he kept a harem of “bitches” and “hos” without the formalities of marriage, and callously dumped his kids — if acknowledged by him as his kids –- with his “baby mamas”, to

be cared for haphazardly, or often not at all. “But how can you make generalizations about an entire race of people?” squeak the DWLs. Ah, the eternal cry of the Disingenuous White Liberal! He or she knows very well why we can generalize: because the bitch-slappin’, baby-dumpin’, jail-goin’, work-avoidin’, welfare-moochin’, drug-dealin’, merchandise-stealin’ People of Color we enjoy today are not exceptions to the rule. They are the rule. They represent the true face of black urban America. “But how can you make generalizations about an entire race of people?” Easily. We can generalize about blacks based upon the behaviors typical of blacks as observed in everyday life. The “stereotypical urban black man” is, sadly, the typical urban black man. The proof is as close as the bad side of your own town or city. Take a trip down to where the average black person in your city lives – not the Ghetto, not the Projects, but an ordinary black neighborhood. What do you See? Or visit the local theme park on “African-American Day”, or the beach during Black Fraternity/Sorority Week, or a local urban swimming pool or water park. What do you See? Or visit the local jail. Or that scary spot on the back side of City Park. Or the local welfare office. Or the auditorium of a majority-black public high school on graduation night. Or a “black prom”. Or the local shoe shop on the day the new basketball player/rap star-label sneaker goes on sale. Then open your eyes and See the reality of race in America. But don’t look for too long. Once you cross into Black America, you have left your America behind. When you visit Black America, always remember that to the natives, you are an invader – and a target. (And if you happen to see the Noble Negro of 1964 while you’re there, please ask him to come back. We all really miss him.)

E. FREEDOM OF CHOICE If you are a white person, you are also probably a Christian. And, as such, hatred is foreign to you. Jesus loves the little children, we sing, all the children of the world: red and yellow, black and white – and so do you. As a white Christian, you have been carefully taught to believe in the righteousness of integration, the benefits of diversity, the wonders of the multicultural rainbow. As a white Christian, you say – and try to believe – that you prefer to live in a diverse community. As a white Christian, you say – and try to believe – that you have no problem living with blacks, working with blacks, sending your kids to school with blacks. But what you really believe is quite the opposite. What you really believe – what you know to be true! — is that black people are dangerous. What you really want — what you secretly desire — is to live separately from black people. What you really want — and what you vote for, by fleeing to the lilywhite suburbs — is racial segregation. You. Want. Racial. Segregation. If you didn’t, you would have stayed in the city. Face this fact. Face it! Open your eyes to reality. And if you can do that, if you can summon up the strength of character needed to wake up from the Dream, you will become one of those who can See. But be warned: once you have opened your eyes, you might not like what you See. The sight of reality as it is can be extremely disturbing to those who have been trapped inside Black-Run America’s fog of illusion for most of their lives. The reality of race in America as it is rather than as you have been taught to view it may make you feel extremely uncomfortable. You may even come to feel shame at what you See. You may come to believe that seeing the truth and admitting to it makes you evil. That little voice of White Guilt that the Enemy has implanted in your head may make you avert your eyes from the sight of reality as it is. “Only

NaziswhowanttokillsixmillionJews are against diversity,” it will whisper. “Only Klansmenwhowanttobringbackslavery are against multiculturalism!” The DWL propaganda machine has taught you well. Remember when you had to read To Kill a Mockingbird in school? You don’t want to be one of those wormy, shoeless, no-’count white trash Ewells, eager to watch through their slitted blue eyes as saintly black Tom Robinson is hanged with a lynch rope, now do you? Of course you don’t. You want to be tall, good-looking, heroic Atticus Finch (as portrayed by Gregory Peck), fighting fearlessly for equality, social justice and the Brotherhood of Man! It’s a small world after all, right? Everything is beautiful in its own way, right? You, you are Everyday People, right? Wrong. You are not “everyday people”. You are not evil, a hater, or a Nazi. You have simply opened your eyes. And now you can See. And now the bonds that BRA has placed upon you are visible. Break free. Ignore that lying voice of White Guilt. Overcome the years of programming you have received from TV, from movies, from books, from school, from all the Authorities. Realize that admitting the truth about race in America has nothing to do with slavery, nothing to do with Nazism, nothing to do with the Klan, nothing to do with any of that craziness. Realize that acknowledging the world as it is has nothing to do with racial hatred, nothing to do with anti-Semitism, nothing to do with eugenics, nothing to do with any such immoral thinking. Realize that opening your eyes has nothing to do with being a militiaman, nothing to do with listening to country music, nothing to do with lynching or Mississippi Burning, and nothing to do with being hostile to that nice

black family at church. It simply means accepting reality as it is. It means you can See. BRA was sold to us as a movement for legal equality of opportunity. We thought we were buying was a world in which blacks and whites would be treated equally under the law. What we actually got was a world in which “equality” of outcomes is demanded in every sphere of life — a world in which everyone is forced to ride the Love Train in business, in school, in opportunity — and all at the point of a federal employee’s gun. Racial equality was sold to us as a movement for freedom. We thought we were buying was a world in which every man would be free to live life and pursue happiness in his own way. What we actually got was a world in which you are no longer free to decide who comes through the doors of your own business, school, or social organization. Those doors are now held open to everyone at the point of a federal soldier’s bayonet. Black-Run America has no basis in true freedom. The “freedom” their civil rights scam has brought us is for black people only. After all, racial diversity isn’t just an option — it’s the law. Your private property is no longer your own. In restaurants, in workplaces, in theaters and stadiums and theme parks, you are required by law to associate with black people whether you wish to or not. As a result, you are now required by law to subject yourself and your family to the worst of black behavior. And if you complain about it, or even notice it — you a raciss. We lost the America we had – the Once Upon a Time America that, despite its many flaws and injustices, was a land of freedom, security, and peace. We traded it for a world of “equality”, of “civil rights”, of “social justice”, of diversity, multiculturalism, and racial integration. And when we lost it, we lost our freedom — specifically, our freedom of association, our power to freely choose to associate

or not associate with whomever we pleased. We no longer have freedom of choice. You are no longer a free man. You are a slave of the Disingenuous White Liberals who control Black-Run America. F. NO HIDING PLACE And you’re a runaway slave. When freedom of association was destroyed, white people were left with no choice but physical escape from the lash of Black-Run America. White Flight began. The Interstate highways became our Underground Railroad. And like runaway blacks under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, whites are hunted wherever we flee. Like Uncle Tom hiding from Simon Legree and his dogs, whites must constantly flee from BRA and its media and government bloodhounds. We shiver behind the iron bars of our gated communities and our exburban enclaves, trying desperately to shield our lives from the chaos and violence of black America, even as our TV sets and Internet screens tell them how shamefully racist we are. There is nowhere to hide from Black-Run America. There is no safe haven. There is no place a white person can go to escape black crime, black misbehavior, and black violence, because wherever we go, the DWLs are running the show, and sooner or later they will use the law to impose the rainbow of diversity on even the whitest of suburbs — except the ones they live in, of course. White neighborhoods are colonized by blacks using federal funding programs. White school districts must accept black kids from neighboring districts brought in on buses in order to build schools that “look like America”. White-majority cities will be strongarmed into joining regional public transit systems, establishing a taxpayerfunded invasion route for inner-city Vibrancy.

It’s slavery, and the Bawss don’t let his property go free. You can run, White Nigger, but no matter how far you run, Massa DWL and his legal bloodhounds will find you. But, unlike the runaway black slaves of the 1850s, whites don’t have any good-hearted “abolitionists” to help them escape. The Harriet Beecher Stowes of our day are all on the side of the slaveholder. Every man’s hand is turned against us. We are on our own. And nowhere are we more alone than on the streets of our cities. Black-Run America has decreed that black people cannot be racist and cannot commit hate crimes. Never mind that thousands of White (and Asian, and Latino) people are robbed, raped, and killed by black people every year in our cities. There is no racial motivation behind these crimes! These crimes are random. They just happen to be committed by blacks – no, excuse me, “youths”. No, I mean “teens”. And even if blacks do rape, rob, beat, and kill you for racial reasons, you deserve it. Your blood is payback for three hundred years of slavery, oppression, lynchings, and segregated lunch counters. Shut up and die, white oppressor. The cities belong to BlackRun America now. And as a result, the cities are dying. Compare our cities today with the same cities in the bad old days of racism. Compare Detroit before integration to Detroit after. Compare segregated Cleveland to diverse Cleveland. Compare East St. Louis, Los Angeles, Oakland, Atlanta, Memphis, Houston in Jim Crow days to those cities as they exist today. Are they better places now – better for blacks or whites – than before? Are their people — white or black — better off today? Are they happier? Are their families, schools, neighborhoods better?

Is life better in America now that we’re “diverse”? Or was life better for everyone when blacks lived separately from the rest of us? If you are honest, you know the answer to that question. But you dare not speak the truth aloud. Not yet, anyway. G. THE MANTRA This book is intended primarily for a white American readers. But the War on White People is not limited to the USA. The War on White People is a World War. And around the world, wherever you go, respectable people are talking about the problem of racism. The problem, they say, is white people. “White people are racist,” they say, “And white privilege is the reason.” These “anti-racists” believe that white people work together to rig society in favor of whites, and to keep nonwhites from succeeding. This is what they mean by “white privilege”. This problem of racism will only be solved, these people tell us, when white privilege is eliminated around the world. And the way to get rid of white privilege, in their view, is by getting rid of white people. In other words, they are saying that once the white majorities are eliminated worldwide, the problem of racism will be solved. They intend to eliminate the word’s white majorities by massive nonwhite immigration into white-majority countries — and only into white-majority countries — in order to increase diversity. They want white people to reproduce with nonwhite people as much as possible. The more intermarriage between whites and nonwhites, the fewer white people there will be as time passes. The sooner white majorities in each country are ended by these means, they tell us, the sooner we will see the end of the white race. And when the white race is gone, they tell us, the problem of racism is solved.

To sum up: these “anti-racists” want to reduce the number of white people in the world. They are advocating the elimination of the white race as the final solution to the problem of racism. “Anti-racist” is a code phrase that means “white genocide”. The goal these “anti-racists” is a world without white people. Their goal is a world without you. So what are you going to do about it? PART III. FIGHTING BACK A. LEARNING TO SEE Any sane black person would object to a plan for the genocide of the black race. Any sane Jewish person would object to a plan for the genocide of the Jewish race. But Disingenuous White Liberals have no objection to the planned genocide of the white race. And they will not permit you to object to white genocide, either. In fact, whites are forbidden even to notice it. A white person can protest the genocide of any other group all day long, but the minute a white person objects to the planned elimination of his own race, the white “anti-racists” attack. And not just with dirty looks, whispers, or harsh words. If a DWL suspects you might be a racist, they will do their best to hurt you. They will exert every effort to ruin your reputation, destroy your means of earning a living, and intimidate your family and friends into ostracizing you – and they will do it all with the fire of righteousness burning in their eyes. As far as they are concerned, if you are against the genocide of the white race, then you are a white supremacist, a hater, a Nazi, a racist – in other words, fair game. And the worst part is that they have trained other white people to believe the same thing. Don’t believe me? Take a look at yourself. You probably feel like you are doing something wrong right this minute. Even

though you don’t hate anybody, even though you don’t want to hurt anybody, you probably feel like a bad person just for reading this book. But you aren’t a bad person. You aren’t doing anything wrong. There is nothing wrong with loving your own people. There is nothing bad about wanting to see your own people continue to exist. You have been brainwashed into hating yourself by the people who hate you – the so-called anti-racists. But they are the real racists. The real racists are the people who have trained you to hate yourself, and to hate your own people. The real racists are the ones who want to eliminate white people from the face of the earth. But white people are still here. We are alive. And we are beginning to See. If we can wake up to our own identity, if we can realize the power we have, we can sweep aside every scheme of the Disingenuous White Liberals, take down BlackRun America, and smash the Revolution behind it all. If we are to survive, we must learn to look past the programming. We must learn to See the truth. B. THE THREE TRUTHS Negation: White people do not exist. Condemnation: White people have no right to exist. Dehumanization: White people have no right to exist as White people. These are the lies upon which the War on White People is built. But in war of lies, truth is the ultimate weapon. And the first truth we must come to See is the Unspeakable Truth about White people. The Unspeakable Truth is really three truths — the Truths that can blunt the triple threat of negation, condemnation, and dehumanization, the Truths that can turn these weapons back upon the Enemy

These are the Three Truths. Know them. Share them. They are our greatest weapons in this War on White People. 1. WHITE PEOPLE EXIST “White people exist.” This is the most important truth. This is the truth that sets you free. By simply saying these words, you have begun the fight to liberate yourself from the slavery of Black-Run America. You have joined the rebellion against those who would destroy us. You have taken your first step on the road to victory. You have recognized the First Truth: that White people exist. But what are White people? What is the White race? (And why has a capital W suddenly appeared at the beginning of the word “White”?) You’ve probably heard people say that race is a “social construct”. In other words, “race” is all in your mind. It’s just a label that white people use to keep a brother down. Well, don’t believe it. That’s pure Black-Run America propaganda. It’s just an example of DWLs trying to bend the truth to line up with their ideology. The truth is that race is a biological reality, a scientific fact. A race is a group of people who have a common genetic background and who are characterized by similarity of biology and behavior. There are three races of man: the Caucasian race, also known as the European race; the Mongoloid race, also known as the Asiatic race; and the Negroid race, also known as the African race. We’ll call these three races the white, the yellow and the black race for short. (There are of course many different groups and types of people within each race, and there are many persons of mixed race as well, but deep down inside at the level of the bones, cells, and DNA everybody is primarily one race or another.)

The differences between the races can be and are confirmed on a daily basis by anthropologists, physicians, forensic scientists, and genetic researchers around the world. Forensic anthropologists, for example, can classify a dead person’s race with an accuracy of close to 100% based only on the dead the deceased individual’s skeletal remains. And police scientific investigators have used DNA evidence to identify a living black bank robber who committed his crimes disguised as a white man [25]. Since researchers can positively identify where the ancestors of a person come from — in other words, what race they belong to — just by looking at that person’s DNA, then there’s just no getting around the fact that race is a physical, genetic reality – not a “construct” of any kind. Race is not complicated. It is a simple biological reality. “Population geneticists increasingly report that people can be unerringly classified by ‘continental population groups,’ and thoughtful readers realize that ‘continental population group’ is only a polite way of saying ‘race’” [26]. Common sense is a better guide than liberal myths. Call them “continental population groups”, call them “races”, the reality is the same: three basic sub-types of human exist, each adapted to the environment of its continent or origin. White people are descended from the prehistoric peoples of Europe. Caucasians are the “continental population group” originating in Europe. They have a common phenotype — that is, DNA expresses itself in the body structure of Caucasians in a number of typical ways. For example, European peoples tend to have skulls that are shaped differently than the skulls of Asians of Africans. Caucasian hair tends to be lighter in color, wavier, and softertextured than the hair of Asians, and lighter, softer, and less kinked than the hair of Africans. Caucasians are of course also usually much more fair-skinned than members of the other two races — that is, they have lighter and more translucent skin.

There are many other physical differences between the races as well — differences in IQ, blood cells, metabolism, brain size, muscle efficiency, and more — and they are all genetically based. As one researcher put it: A few gene variants are population-specific or very nearly so. Certain genetic diseases due to specific mutations, for example, are found almost exclusively among Ashkenazi Jews. Likewise, the Duffy antigen phenotype Fy (a-b-) is very rare among whites, but is found in nearly all black Africans. The gene SLC 24A5, which influences skin pigmentation, comes in two variants that differ by only one nucleotide, but produce different proteins. One variant is found in 99 to 100 percent of Europeans, and the other is found in 93 to 100 percent of Africans, East Asians, and Amerindians. A mutation linked to deafness, GJB2 35delG, has been found at varying frequencies in European populations and also in Jews, but seems to be absent from other population groups. Gene variants that result in lactose tolerance or a relative resistance to HIV infection are found most frequently in Northern Europe, less frequently in other parts of Europe, and are increasingly rare outside of Europe [...] More population-specific (and nearly specific) genetic differences are likely to be discovered in the future, to go along with the greater number of genetic variations that are not group-specific, but that exhibit marked differences in frequency between groups. We are indeed significantly different. Current dogma cannot change the facts [27]. Different genes, different races. These genetic differences, as well, as your skin, eye, and hair color, identify you as a Caucasian, as a white person. But as an American of European ancestry, you are more than just a white person. You are a White person. And there’s that capital W again! What does it mean? What makes a white person a White person? It isn’t DNA or body structure alone. Yes, Europeans are Caucasian, but if you call a European a “white person” he’ll probably look at you funny. European people usually don’t

think of themselves as being “white”. Instead, the European identifies himself by nationality — that is, by his ethnic heritage. “I’m not a ‘white person’,” he’ll say. “I’m Irish!” — or German, or Italian, or Hungarian, or French, or Polish, etc. A Breton is a Breton, a Bohemian is a Bohemian, and all are white men only by contrast with nonwhites. All Caucasians are small-w white people, but not every Caucasian is a capital-W White person. The European Caucasian has an identity — his or her nationality. He or she is white in terms of skin color, yes — but being White, capital-W, means more than that. Let me explain. There are two kinds of Caucasians, two tribes of small-w white people. There is the European Caucasian, the group of white people who live in Europe today and who are descended from the Europeans who destroyed the Neanderthals and claimed the continent for themselves. And there are the peoples of the European Diaspora — those peoples living outside of Europe that are descended from Europeans. Diaspora is just a fancy word for “scattering”, and that’s what the European Diaspora is – those Caucasian/ European/White people who are scattered around the world. Unlike our cousins back in Europe, however, we White people of the Diaspora have no nationality, no ethnic or racial identity. We are neither Bohemians, nor Czechs, nor Illyrians, nor Celts. We are just “white people”, small-w, who happen to be citizens of one country or another. We are nothing. And that’s got to change. It’s not our fault. It’s the way the system is set up. Let’s take the United States for example. When the American colonies broke away from Britain, the Founding Fathers and other independence-minded folks around at the time decided they wanted nothing more to do with old Europe and the old idea of blood-and-soil nationality. And so they created America as a so-called “proposition nation” — that is, as a political entity tied together by a proposition (the U.S. Constitution) instead of by shared ancestry and culture.

This worked out okay in the beginning because America was a nation of shared ancestry and culture. While the new U.S.A. was by law a proposition nation, it was in fact a White country. Our European-American ancestors didn’t lose their nationality overnight. For much of our history, American citizens identified themselves largely in terms of their European origins — that is, as Germans, Irishmen, Englishmen, Italians, Frenchmen, Poles, Scottish and Scotch-Irish, Dutchmen, Norwegians, Swedes, etc. These ethnic communities lived together in enclaves in America’s dense inner cities and exhibited the full range of inner-city problems — poverty, gang violence, crime, and so forth. These folks were Americans in terms of taxes and military duty, but in every other way they identified themselves by their countries of origin. But this de facto White America didn’t last. With the coming of modern means of communication and transportation came the dispersal of the lower-income inner-city White ethnic enclaves basic to these identities. The ties of language, culture, and religion linking European-Americans with the Old Country began to fray and break. As the first half of the 20th Century passed, the old German, Russian, Irish, and other American ethnic neighborhoods withered away. Hostility and suspicion toward “foreign types” began to spread in America. This suspicion, coupled with the rapid social, cultural, and economic changes produced by World Wars I and II, began the final crackup of ethnic America. “No more hyphenated Americans!” roared Teddy Roosevelt. We were all just Americans now. Fast forward to World War II: the exegencies of the war led to the racial (and sexual) integration of the workforce in America. Federal Law mandated integration on factory floor; whites and blacks worked side by side building bombers and boats; women stood next to men in shipyards and steel mills. This first taste of federal integration was followed by the postwar economic boom, leading in turn to the Baby Boom. Urban ethnic Whites, now economically empowered by high-paying jobs and gifted

with new mobility thanks to the expanding freeway networks, set out to buy a piece of the Good Life in freeway-enabled suburbia. The rise of the freeway suburb, with its aggressive sameness and isolated architecture, smoothed out the ethnic distinctions that had characterized the old neighborhoods; European identity in America was destroyed once and for all. Was this a good thing? There is room for doubt. Life in suburbia had its charms: big houses, easy traffic, cheap taxes, wide lawns. It was everything the old, urban ethnic neighborhoods were not. But all this came at a cost: white ethnic identity. Before World War II, most White Americans knew what they were: a Pole, a Lett, a Spaniard, what have you. A sense of belonging came with these ethnic identities: if you were a Czech, you ate Czech food, celebrated Czech holidays, spoke Czech with other Czechs, and danced with your Czech wife down at the Sokol Hall (open to Czechs and guests only). The inner cities in the old White America may have been crowded, dirty, and sometimes violent, but those who lived in them did so with the knowledge that they were part of something, that they were not alone. Today, seven decades later, most White Americans do not identify themselves by ethnicity. Instead, we have been melded into a more or less seamless whole, a nationless conglomeration of colorless White nonpeople, a non-entity with no language, culture, or traditions. And now even this weakened identity is being destroyed. In today’s America, identifying oneself as a White person has become in most circumstances the epitome of poor taste. Thanks to fifty years of progressive propaganda, White people in America by and large reject the idea of whiteness altogether. Most whites have bought into the idea that “America” is a patchwork of racial and cultural identities, a mosaic of many different kinds of Americans: Blacks, Asian-Americans, Mexican-Americans, and many more. But not European-Americans. Anyone who dares speak of

“White people” in America had better be admonishing them for being racist, greedy, or bad in some other way. We Whites have come to believe that our “whiteness” is fictional — that the very idea of white people is just an artificial identity constructed for the purpose of domination and genocide. Whites in America are permitted no racial consciousness, no racial identity, no racial soldarity. Everyone eats pizza and burgers; everybody speaks English; and anybody can rent out the Sokol Hall. Blacks can self-identify and self-organize, and no one cares. Hispanics can self-identify and self-organize, and no one cares. Asians can self-identify and self-organize, and no one cares. But any attempt by Whites to organize themselves, or even identify themselves as White people in any way, is considered tantamount to the ultimate crime: racism. This is the reason I have chosen the term “White” to represent the peoples of the European Diaspora. The capital W represents our new identity — not as Europeans, not as citizens of our various propositional nations, but as a new nation, a nation of Europeans living outside of Europe – the global nation of White people. European whites have an identity. Diaspora Whites need one too. That’s why I use the capital W: if you are a white person and you live outside the Caucasian homeland of Europe, Great Britain, or Scandinavia, you are a member of the European Diaspora. You are White. Every Caucasian is small-w white. But only a person of European ancestry and culture who is living outside of Europe is capital-W White. White people are the people of the European Diaspora, wherever they may live. Or are we? The Revolution says “no”. Black-Run America has spoken. Whites can’t be Europeans. That would be raciss. We can’t be White Americans, either. That would be raciss. And we can’t be White people. That would be raciss, too. Soon it will no longer be merely rude to identify ourselves

as White people. It will be a crime. After all, only White people can be racist. Raciss, raciss, raciss, everything we do is raciss! And BRA has decreed that, as racists, White people do not, cannot, and must not exist. But White people do not need anyone’s permission to exist. We, the White people of America – and of Canada, of Australia and New Zealand, of dying South Africa and late, lamented Rhodesia, and of the other countries of the European Diaspora — do exist. White People Exist. And admitting that simple fact is the key to White survival. 2. WHITE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXIST Once upon a time there was a little boy whose heart was full of hate. But not just any hate. This little boy hated White people. He hated everything about White people – their looks, their culture, their accomplishments, their very existence. He hated them so much that he dedicated his entire life to hating White people. He wrote, he spoke, he curried the favor of the news media, the intelligentsia, and the political establishment with one goal in mind: the destruction of White people. This little boy hated White people so much that he wrote and published an article expressing his hatred. In his own words, he expressed his fondest dream — the destruction of White people in America: [I]n the pantheon of American history, old white people have always been the bad guys, the keepers of the hegemonic and reactionary flame, the folks unwilling to share the category of American with others on equal terms. Fine, so screw you then. Because you’re a dying breed. On the endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of

muskrat, you are not worth saving In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won’t be any more white people around who actually remember that Leave it to Beaver, Father Knows Best, Opie-Taylor-Down-at-the-Fishing Hole cornpone bullshit that you hold so near and dear to your heart. There won’t be any more white folks around who think the 1950s were the good old days, because there won’t be any more white folks around who actually remember them, and so therefore, we’ll be able to teach about them accurately and honestly, without hurting your precious feelings, or those of the so-called “greatest generation” — a bunch of miscreants who saved the world from fascism only to return home and oppose the ending of it here, by doing nothing to lift a finger on behalf of the civil rights struggle. So frankly, to hell with you and all who revere you. By then, half the country will be black or brown. And there is nothing you can do about it. [F]olks of color, and even a decent size minority of us white folks, will [soon] be able to crush you… And they know how to regroup, and plot, and plan, and they are planning even now – we are – your destruction… We just have to be patient. And wait for your hearts to stop beating. And stop they will. And for some of you, real damned soon truth be told. Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of your demise is beautiful. [28] There can be no other word for this sort of talk but hatred – pure, Satanic hatred. One can easily imagine the same sort of speech being given by a smirking SS officer to a shivering band of Jews just before ordering the machine-gunning of them all. Just as the Nazis are said to have panted after a “final solution” to the Jewish Question, this little boy wants to see you, your

children, and everyone White like you exterminated. He wants you gone. He wants everything you believe in, everything you stand for, everything you are, to die. And, strangest of all, this little boy is white. This little boy is a Disingenuous White Liberal. He knows very well the truth about black people. He lives – as do most DWLs – in a nice, cozy, safe, 98% white neighborhood. Yet he considers himself different from you. He considers himself an “honorary Negro” – a white person who deserves to live because he hates his own kind and identifies himself with the black race. That’s why he uses the term “we” in his letter. He really, truly feels that his hatred of his fellow white people, his guilt at the crimes of his ancestors, somehow makes him worthy of survival in the World Without White People that he so confidently predicts. This little boy is a propagandist for Black-Run America. And his message is simple: White people have no right to exist. And there are plenty of white people who agree with him. Self-hating white people are nothing new. They had them in ancient Rome. They were the Gracchi. [T]he Gracchi were two brothers who, although belonging to one of the great patrician families of Rome, could not feed their ambition sufficiently within the orbit of their own aristocratic caste. Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus found that in times of stress in a relatively tolerant republic a descent of one or two steps in the social ladder is equivalent to an ascent of several steps in the political ladder. Accordingly, they became the standard bearers of revolution and agrarian revolt and were adulated by the plebeians. The Gracchi’s political strategy, it might be added, was by no means limited to stirring up class against class, peasant against landlord,’ exploited against exploiters. The patricians, the descendants of the Italic invaders, differed racially from the plebs [29]. Sad, isn’t it? There exists an entire race of people who hate their own existence, who believe that they are intrinsically

evil, and who long for the day when they and everyone like them are dead. Insanity. But that’s the power of White Guilt. The little boy is frightened. He rants and raves about the inevitable end of White people because he senses the truth: he senses that the power of White Guilt is fading. The ability of people like this little boy to convince White people that they have no right to exist is decreasing day by day. Because day by day, more and more Whites are looking at people like this little boy and laughing in their faces. It’s pathetic. Our country, dominated by well-fed, universityeducated White people like this little boy, people who hate their own kind and think they are on the Team of Color. It’s enough to make you cry. I mean, how does a person get so crazy, so full of hate, that he becomes a cheerleader for genocide of his own people? Being a Disingenuous White Liberal is like being a black member of the Ku Klux Klan. It’s like being a member of the Israeli Nazi Party. It makes precisely zero sense. There’s no need to debate people like this little boy. The only sane response to such a person is mocking laughter. White people do have the right to exist. We do not have to justify our existence to anyone. We are here, and — no matter what the little boy with his heart full of hate says — we are going to remain here. Be proud of what you are. But don’t just acknowledge your existence. Proclaim it! Go to the window, throw open the shutters, lean out over the street or into your yard and tell the world: I am somebody. I am somebody. I am a child of God. I may not have the Federal Entity on my side but I am somebody.

I may not have the right to keep the money I earned, but I am somebody. I may not get free food, free housing, and free medical care, but I am somebody. I may not get a job or a college degree based upon my skin color, but I am somebody. So let the little boy and all of his White-hating buddies spew their poison. The Second Truth remains: White people have the right to exist. 3. WHITE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXIST AS WHITE PEOPLE It is not enough that White people exist. It is not enough that White people have the right to exist. We must come together as White people if we hope to survive the War on White People. White people must exist as White people – not as some vaguely-defined mishmash of pale people, but as a nation. What is a nation? A nation is an ethnos united by a common culture. Ethnic Germans united by German culture equal the German nation. Ethnic Danes united by Danish culture equal the Danish nation. Ethnic Jews united by Jewish culture equal the Jewish nation. Within America are many true nations. You read or hear about them every day. The Cherokee. The Acadians. The Black Community. “La Raza” of the Mexican-Americans. We celebrate the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Junior Day, Cinco de Mayo, the Vietnamese lunar new year of Tet, Chanukkah, the annual Chinese Zodiac. It seems that every race and nation in America has its own special month, or holiday, or festival. Every nation except us. Every nation except the White nation. We once had European ethnic nations in America. There was once a time when Germans in America had their own ethnic

and cultural social structure. This was also true of the Irish, the Swedes, and many other groups of Europeans in America. But those days are gone. Sure, we still have Saint Patrick’s Day and Oktoberfest and Columbus Day, but these are more fun excuses to have a beer than genuine ethnic holidays. The days of “Irish cops” and “German tailors” are gone. Even the Mafia, aka la Cosa Nostra, has fallen on hard times. Whites in America have been stripped of their nationalities. We have been blended, ground up, and mashed together into one vast, flavorless mass: a mass called “white people”. America is a continent, not a nation. There is no American nation because there is neither an American ethnos nor an American culture. There can’t be. America is a political entity, one based not upon ties of blood and belief but upon ideology. It is a polity based not upon kinship and custom but upon a set of propositions written on a sheet of parchment – the United States Constitution. That thin parchment, along with naked force, is the only thing that unites Americans. In truth, the United States and the other proposition “nations” are not nations at all. America is a multinational superstate, an empire if you will – an empire united by ideological propositions, held together by naked force, and ruled by a single, all-powerful metropole (Washington, D.C., the capital of Black-Run America) and controlled by a ideologically-driven political and bureaucratic aristocracy (the Disingenuous White Liberals). Unlike a real empire, however, the “empire” of Black-Run America is not a natural outgrowth of an ambitious nation. It was crafted by artificers, built stone by stone by masons guided by a rule of their own. Unlike a real metropole, the imperial capital in Washington has no traditions to love, no God to cite as the source of its power. It is the capstone of a self-laid pyramid of power, a new order of the ages. And unlike a real aristocracy, the DWL elite does not rule “by the Grace of God” and command the personal loyalty of the citizenry. The DWLs gained their power by cunning, and they

hold it by manipulation, intimidation, and brutality. But America can be more. We’ve got to be more – if we are to survive. Black-Run America is an empire built on sand, and, like all things founded upon that insubstantial fundament the Federal Entity is destined to fall. But nations need not fall. Nations are built upon the rock of shared ancestry, shared culture, shared belief. If Whites in America can come together, recognize the ethnic ties that define us, the European culture that binds us, and the Christian belief that sustains us, we can survive the collapse of Black-Run America. Ethnicity + culture = nation. We must become a nation – the White Nation in America. But why hasn’t this happened? Why have Whites in America not bonded and formed their own nation? Because the historic white majority in America does not see itself as a people. “The great problem,” wrote that late social observer Lawrence Auster, is that American Whites “have no political or cultural existence as the majority. Not only do whites fail to represent themselves as a group,” he continues, “But many of them think it is immoral and un-American for a white person even to think of himself as being white. Whites thus have no identity as whites, nor are they allowed to have any. Within the terms of our current order, whites as whites are nothing, even as non-white groups aggressively assert their own group identities and are endowed—by that same passive white majority!—with official and favored status” [30]. Mere existence isn’t enough. Having the right to exist isn’t enough. We must exist as White people – that is, as a group united by ancestry and culture. We must become a new nation, neither German-American nor Irish-American nor AngloAmerican, but White American. We must establish a new identity, an identity not tied to any one European identity but to our own White American identity.

“We face an enemy that is inherently intangible,” writes social critic Brett Stevens. “It cannot be fought by slicing at heads of the Hydra. We must instead destroy its central idea, which is that a society can be composed of individuals without a central values system and heritage holding them together. If we get rid of that foolish illusion, we can halt decline and – while we can’t reverse it – we can re-start society and move past decline to a brighter future” [31]. If White people are going to escape genocide, we must unite. We must be a people, a nation. We can do this in two ways. First, we must preserve our genetic patrimony – that is, the DNA left to us by our ancestors. These are our European genetics, the physical essence of Whiteness. Second, we must preserve our uniquely White Christian culture, the soul of the White race. If we can unite to protect and defend these things, if we can come to exist as White people we will move beyond mere survival to a higher existence as White people. We will become the White Nation. And the White Nation can destroy Black-Run America. C. WHAT IS TO BE DONE? On May 10, 2012, the House of Representatives of the 112th Congress of the United States, in its second session, passed House Resolution 4133. This resolution contained the following statement of policy: It is the policy of the United States: To reaffirm the enduring commitment of the United States to the security of the State of Israel as a Jewish state... and to encourage Israel’s neighbors to recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state. As ethnic nationalists, we White Nationalists of course support this resolution. We want Israel to exist. We want a

whole world of “Israels” – a whole world of ethnostates. All we Whites want is what the Jews have got: a state of our own. Unfortunately for us Whites, we don’t have the awesome lobbying firepower of our Jewish friends. There’s not going to be any act of Congress guaranteeing us the right to our own state. All we have are our hearts and our hands. We are going to have to use these tools to overthrow Black-Run America and the clique of Disingenuous White Liberals that run it. And – believe me – we can do it. But we can’t put the cart before the horse. The Jews were a nation for millennia. They only gained a state in 1947. Likewise, before we can build the White State, we have to define the White Nation. We must identify and preserve those things left to us by our ancestors, those things that make us White: our physical being (that is, our genetic patrimony) and our spiritual being (our cultural patrimony). The European Diaspora in North America is a distinct nation, a nation with its own genetic heritage, its own culture, its own conscience, its own history, and its own identity. It is this we must preserve. You’ve probably heard that there is no such thing as race in the biological sense of the word, that all humans are so similar genetically that there’s no real basis for the idea of race. The problem is that this claim is untrue. While it’s a fact that all human beings have the same basic DNA, it’s also true that within that DNA are clusters of genes called “alleles” – and that these alleles can be divided into four basic groups. These groups, which correspond to the four major landmasses of the Earth, are responsible for the differences in body types, structures, and chemistry that we call race. “[G]enetic studies have recapitulated the classical definition of races based on continental ancestry - namely African, Caucasian (Europe and Middle East), Asian, Pacific Islander (for example, Australian, New Guinean and Melanesian), and Native American” [32]. In other words, each race has a link to a specific geographic

location. And we are not “all Africans” as you may have been told. While it is possible that the human race originated in Africa, it is hardly certain. “[T]he discovery of a new primate that lived about 37 million years ago in the ancient swamplands of Myanmar bolsters the idea that the deep primate family tree that gave rise to humans [sic] is rooted in Asia. If true, the discovery suggests that the ancestors of all monkeys, apes, and humans — [ a group] known as the anthropoids — arose in Asia and made the arduous journey to the island continent of Africa almost 40 million years ago” [33]. The truth is that no one really knows where or how the human race began. And it doesn’t matter. The original humans, wherever they may have lived, were no doubt genetically very similar, but when the ancestors of the Europeans went to Europe, and when the ancestors of the Asians left for Asia, changes in the DNA appeared. Over the subsequent few thousand years, the alleles found in European DNA and in Asian DNA diverged from each other and from the DNA of the Africans who stayed behind. As a result, we can identify different races because we can link the physical features of each to those of ancestral populations in certain geographic areas. Black people come from Africa. White people come from Europe. Yellow people come from Asia. “Red” men come from the Americas (and are a subset of Yellow people). It’s important not to make a fetish of “racial purity”. Outside of some few inhabitants of the original racial homelands it’s unlikely that any of us is “pure” anything, given the human race’s propensity for intermarriage and other forms of interbreeding. Yet even taking interbreeding, migration, and so forth into account, the three major racial divisions of mankind remain distinct. Take the Japanese, for example: they are a distinct

ethno-cultural group (a nation), the members of which typically identify themselves as being “racially” Japanese. Yet an examination of the unique haplotypes (pairedallele “markers”) in the DNA of modern Japanese (aka the “Hondo-Japanese”) can be interpreted as evidence of mixed ancestry. “Two fundamental population groups are ancestral to modern Japanese populations. One group, represented by the Jomonese who gave rise to the modern Ainu and probably also the Ryukyuan populations, has its origin in the Upper Paleolithic populations of northeast Asia… The other group is the later migrants of the Yayoi and Kofun periods who also came from northeast Asia but were different genetically and morphologically from the ﬁrst group. Intermixtures occurred between these two groups, but the genetic inﬂuence of the second group is predominant in the majority of modern Japanese” [34]. Yet despite these “internal” differences, the Japanese exist as Japanese. No one would claim that the Japanese are white people or black people. Despite their internal genetic diversity, modern Japanese are all members of the Asian, “yellow”, Mongoloid race. In the same way, modern White people are – despite the various genetic differences between them – clearly and identifiably members of the European, white, Caucasian race. You as a white person may have ancestors who were Irish (Celt), German (Frank), French (Gaul), American “Indian” (Mongol), and maybe even African of the white (Berber) or black (Moor) varieties, but you are clearly a Caucasian, not an African or an Asian. You are White. “How can you call yourselves ‘White people’?” some may ask. “There’s no ‘Whiteland’ for you to be from.” Oh, but there is. It’s called Europe. Europe is Whiteland. And just as a black person from Kenya and a black person from Nigeria are both black, a white person from Wales and a white person from Ukraine are both White.

If blacks are “African Americans”, Whites must be “EuropeanAmericans”. Please note that White identity does not entail any notion of biological supremacy. White identity is simply recognition of human biological diversity, not a claim to the title “master race”. The very idea of a single “master” race is ridiculous. Each race has its own unique strengths and weaknesses. Take sports as an example: there is a good reason – a genetic reason – that most world-class runners are of African ancestry; why Asians tend to excel in gymnastics; why Europeans are on average the best swimmers. There are likewise good reasons – genetic reasons – why many Africans broadly speaking can’t properly digest milk; why many Asians broadly speaking tend to be small of stature; why many Europeans get malaria in tropical climes. And it’s no coincidence that most Europeans have the ability to digest lactose; most Africans have a natural resistance to the tropical parasite that causes one kind of malaria; and most Asians have a compact body type ideally suited for the environment from which they come. And then there are the differences in average intelligence. It is a fact that North Asians and Europeans have higher IQs on average than do Africans. It’s not because we whiteys are Aryan supermen, nor are our yellow fellows Sons of Heaven; nor is it because black men are the “cursed sons of Ham” or any such thing – it’s just a matter of adaptation to environment. What do we mean by “adaptation to environment”? Simply this: In tropical climes like Africa, survival is relatively easy for the natives. Food (fruit, shellfish, small game, etc.) is ubiquitous and plentiful; the need for shelter minimal; the technology needed to survive basic; the benefits of intricatelystructured social organization few; and delayed gratification is not strictly necessary for survival. Life is pretty easy in warm climates, all things considered. Our Europeans and Northern Asian ancestors had it far harder. The extreme environment of the northern latitudes during the glacial periods quickly weeded out the less-

intelligent and more-impulsive of our ancestors. Fire was vital for survival in the cold north: our ancestors developed a firecentered culture around the gathering and production of fuel and its use for warming, lighting, and cooking. Forage was scarce. The shortness of the growing season and the relative lack of easy prey made getting enough to eat a problem. Our ancestors had to be smart enough to develop agricultural technology so that they could grow sufficient crops for winter during the short northern growing season. They had to develop food preservation techniques like pickling, salting, and smoking in order to preserve these foods during the long northern winters, They had to develop weapons and techniques with which to hunt the large, powerful northern game animals. They had to adapt these hunting techniques into combat skills needed to defend family, food, and fuel from aggressors both human and animal. They developed clothing, shoes, headgear, and other raiment to protect the body from extremes of cold and heat. They created many varieties of weatherproof housing. They domesticated wild beasts for meat and milk. They raised and sheared sheep suitable for northern conditions. And they created art, literature, and verse by which to express themselves, pass the time, and acknowledge the mysterious hidden forces behind man and nature. Our European ancestors strictly ordered their lives. They had to: in the harsh environment of ancient Europe, disorder could very easily mean death. Impulse control, so necessary for the structuring of lives around long-term goals such as building weatherproof lodging, food storage facilities, and organized military forces became ingrained in our nature. These ordered, innovative Europeans outbred those with lesssedentary, more-volatile natures [35]. Those of higher innate intelligence survived. We are the result. Now, nobodyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s saying that all whites and yellows and Jews are smart and all blacks are stupid. We all know brainy blacks. We all know white and yellow and Jewish morons.

But these are exceptions to the general rule of innate intelligence. As social critic Hunter Wallace points out, “IQs regress toward the mean. There are ‘intelligent blacks’ who work for ‘computer companies’. There are ‘stupid White people’ who ‘do not graduate high school’. [But] that doesn’t mean the children of the black computer scientist or the White high school dropout will necessarily inherit the high or low intelligence of their parents. They will trend toward the racial average” [36]. It for this and other reasons that miscegenation (racial mixing, whether through fornication or through legal marriage) must be minimized if the White race is to survive. Our genes are rare and precious, and as such are easily destroyed in combination of those of non-Whites. Therefore, we Whites must do what we can to preserve and protect our genetic heritage. But how? The Revolution that gave us Black-Run America is the same force that created the great revolutions of the past, the prime example of which is the French Revolution. And while the motto of the natural order is “Tradition, Family, Property”, the slogan of the Revolution – and of BRA – is and has always been “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.” The Disingenuous White Liberals and their Revolutionary controllers champion “liberty” – the cult of the individual, the idea that each man is a free and independent being responsible only to himself and his own definition of Reality – above all. They promote “equality”, the notion that all men are by nature equal, and therefore that no man has the right to rule any other man. And they hold forth for “fraternity”, the idea that these liberated and equal men are all brothers, and that any loyalty to one set of humans over another – such as nationalism, ethnicity, or race – is treason against the Brotherhood of Man. All poppycock, of course. Rousseau famously claimed that “all men are born free”, but the lie in that statement is evident on its face: each of us who is courageous enough to be honest

knows from personal experience that every man, unless liberated from his own sinful inclinations by God, is a slave to his own desires. Jefferson tells us that all men are created “equals” in terms of rights. But do men have any natural rights? A right is by definition something that cannot be taken away, but we all know that in reality any “right” can be taken away. The equal right of every man to life ends at the edge of the concentration camp burial pit. The equal right to liberty vanishes like smoke at the gate of the gulag. The equal right to the pursuit of happiness ends on the abortionist’s table. If a right can be taken away, it is no right, and therefore any talk of equality of rights is pure fantasy. And as for fraternity: well, I suppose we are all children of God, and thus are brothers in a spiritual sense. But we are also each the sons and daughters of our own human parents and ancestors – a relationship created by that same God, and central to His natural order of things. God Himself did not come to Earth as some generic, asexual human being, panracial and pan-sexual. He came to Earth as a male, a Jew, a man with a Jewish mother and a Jewish foster father and Jewish cousins and a Jewish royal bloodline and a list of Hebrew ancestors stretching all the way back to Adam. Jesus was born tribal. Jesus was born ethnic. He is the only begotten Son of God, and, while he loves all men equally, he most certainly did not create us equals — or “brothers”, or atomized individuals with the right to do whatever we like. Liberty, equality, and fraternity are not truths given by God. They are the three lies of His Enemy and ours. This mix of solipsistic individualism and false fraternity is the great pile of ordure upon which the so-called Enlightenment is based. Rousseau’s lethal cocktail of unrestricted individual liberty mixed with unquestioning obedience to the “general will” is a potion that has poisoned every man and every society that has been stupid enough to drink it. As traditionalists, we must knock this poisoned cup from

the filthy hand of those who would drug us with it. Just as we must oppose antlike collectivism, we must likewise oppose Promethean individualism. The cult of the so-called “free man” – the fallacy of Enlightenment egoism, the chisel by which the Revolution destroyed society in the West – is the church of the Enemy. We must resist the urge to think of ourselves as independent atoms of humanity with the same strength with which we oppose the homogenization by which we become “the people”. The idea of man as god, a self-sufficient, self-defining being, totally independent, totally free, is a lie. It has its origin in the words of Lucifer, the Prince of Lies, the very being who deceived our ancestors into turning their backs upon God and one another in a quest for self-conscious “wisdom” [37]. Like Prometheus, Lucifer defied Heaven to bring the fire of selfdeification to man, to make of each man an Atlas, holding the Universe upon his own back – that is, defining Reality itself by his own independent will. If you want to fight Black-Run America, if you want to destroy the Disingenuous White Liberals, if you want the White Nation to rise, the one thing that you must do is rid yourself of the idea that you are a Rousseauian “free man”, that you are your own person, that you are the center of the universe. In White culture, the individual man is not, not, not the fundamental unit of society. In White culture, the fundamental unit of society is the natural human family, not the individual. This is what must be preserved. I know it goes against everything you have been taught over your entire life, but we have got to break free of the Cult of the Individual Man if we are to survive as a race. Just as we must shun the doctrine of the Mass Man, the global brotherhood of equals, Rousseau’s “general will”, we must avoid becoming what Francis Parker Yockey called “the isolated individual, stateless and rootless, outside of society and family, [an individual] whose life is simply the pursuit of money and erotic

pleasure”. We must affirm “the normal and healthy love of man and wife bound together by many children”, not the Hollywood lie of individualist ‘love”, a “diseased erotic-for-its-own-sake... sexual love of two grains of human sand, superficial and impermanent... [A] ghastly distortion of the sexual life” [38]. If we intend to preserve our culture, we must bring God, the institution of one-man/one-woman monogamous reproductive marriage until death, and the birth and rearing of children back to the center of our society. We must restore the White family to its proper place at the center of our society. The first step: marry and have children only with other White people. Only by minimizing the number of mixed-race marriages does the White family have a hope of survival. Please note that I’m not making a moral claim here. God isn’t going to keep you out of Heaven if you marry a black person. Miscegenation between blacks and whites isn’t a sin – it’s just a bad idea. It’s a simple matter of logic: it takes two White parents to make a White child. If Whites continue to mate with and/or marry non-Whites, there will in time be no more Whites. And that would be horrible. Our ancestors knew this well. Miscegenation was both socially and legally forbidden for most of American history. Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and all the southern colonies had laws prohibiting inter-racial marriage (and in some cases any sexual relationship). 44 out of the 50 United States have had laws on their books prohibiting inter-racial marriage [39]. And then there are the physical, real-world dangers of white-black marriages and matings. Lynn Barkley Burnett and Jonathan Adler, the authors of a 2005 study on domestic violence in the United States, found that “the incidence of spousal homicide is 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages compared to intraracial marriages” [40]. The chances of being killed by your spouse are small, to be sure, but an older study found that white men who married black women were 21.4 times more likely to be killed by their spouses than white men

who married white women. A white woman increases her risk of being killed 12.4 times by marrying a black man [41]. Dr. J. Richard Udry’s 2003 study of 90,000 middle- and high-school students found that black/white and white/Asian children were more likely to be depressed, sleep badly, skip school, smoke, drink, consider suicide, and have sex than children of just one race [42]. The authors of a 2008 study reached the same conclusion: “When it comes to engaging in risky/anti-social adolescent behavior . . . mixed race adolescents are stark outliers compared to both blacks and whites... Mixed race adolescents—not having a natural peer group—need to engage in more risky behaviors to be accepted” [43]. Other research on white/Asian children found that they were twice as likely as mono-racial children—34 percent vs. 17 percent—to suffer from psychological disorders such as anxiety, depression or drug abuse [44]. By any measure, the negative consequences of “dating”, marrying, and/or reproducing with blacks are huge. Don’t believe me, though. Here are the documented facts about miscegenation in terms of: Sexually Transmitted Diseases: White men and women who choose to date blacks have a much higher risk of contracting a sexually transmitted disease (STD), particularly HIV/AIDS. According to a 2009 analysis by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), compared to whites, blacks are 9 times as likely to have syphilis, 9 times as likely to have chlamydia, and 21 times as likely to have gonorrhea [45]. Black men who identify as heterosexual are 15 times as likely to be diagnosed with HIV/AIDS as heterosexual white men, but black men are also more likely to have undiagnosed HIV/AIDS. Black women are 20 times as likely to be diagnosed with HIV/AIDS as white women. The American Journal of Men’s Health, citing data from the CDC, reports that “1 in 16 Black men in the United States will be infected with HIV in their lifetime” [46].

Furthermore, “the long-standing HIV disparity in Black communities is actually increasing for Black men,” partly because “HIV also affects Blacks at younger ages. Blacks between 20 and 24 years old have the highest rates of HIV. By comparison, the highest rates of HIV occur among Whites and Latinos in the 25- to 49-year age group.” According to the same article, although blacks make up 13% of the US population, black men make up 49% of syphilis cases among men, 53% of chlamydia cases, and 73% of gonorrhea cases. These disparities are similar for black women. Furthermore, 40% of blacks have herpes — a figure twice the white rate. Abuse: White men and women who choose to marry blacks are much more likely to suffer abuse from their partners, particularly spousal homicide According to the American Journal of Public Health, a white woman married to a black man is over 12 times as likely to be murdered by her husband as a white woman married to a white man [47]. Even more startling: a white man married to a black woman is 21 times as likely to be murdered by his wife as a white man married to a white woman. Still, the highest risk of death by spousal homicide is incurred by white women married to black men. Furthermore, murder “is the leading cause of death in the United States among young African American women aged 15 to 45 years and the seventh leading cause of premature death among women overall” [48]. The elevated rate among black women is largely due to black women dating and marrying black men almost exclusively; for example, in 2009, 94% of married black women had black husbands [49]. Child Abuse: According to statistics published in Pediatrics, the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, “[c] ases of child abuse and neglect that involve black children are reported to and substantiated by public child welfare agencies at a rate approximately twice that of cases that involve white children” [50]. Furthermore, their findings “suggest that racial bias in

reporting and in the child welfare system are not large-scale drivers of racial disproportionality.” The disparity in reporting rates is due to a disparity in commission rates: black parents are about twice as likely to abuse their children as white parents. Depression and Dissatisfaction: White men and women who choose to date or marry blacks are more likely to suffer depression and report dissatisfaction with their relationships. According to Sociological Quarterly, “nonblack individuals with black partners have significantly more depressive symptoms and less relationship satisfaction than their counterparts with nonblack partners, regardless of respondent race and whether the nonblack partner is the same versus a different race from the respondent” [51]. Now, if you’re the typical American White person, you don’t care about any of these statistical realities. You have been carefully programmed to dismiss, ignore, and/or explain away any facts or figures that make blacks look bad. Any data that casts black people in a bad light are the result of “skewed numbers”, “sample size problems”, and of course the everpopular “bias against blacks” by the statisticians, right? Well, you can tell yourself that. And that’s okay. You can close this book, remain secure in your belief that the books are cooked and that I a raciss, and go on believing in the fantasy that Black-Run America has sold you. But it won’t matter. The facts are the facts. Reality is what it is, whether you believe in it or not. And the reality is that interracial dating, mating, and marriage are bad bets for a White person. In the legal profession, “Think Yiddish, dress British” is a famous maxim for success. There’s wisdom in that! While one’s sense of personal style may or may not contribute to the success of the White race, it’s certain that – if we want the White nation to survive – we could do worse than to look at the Orthodox Jews and do what they have done. After all, the Jews have survived every attempt to destroy them for over

five thousand years. Who better to teach us Whites the art of survival? And what have they traditionally done? They have preserved the Jewish people by preserving the Jewish family. They have limited their marriage choices to their fellow Jews. They have made family the organizing principle of their businesses and commercial lives. They have advanced the fortunes of family members over outsiders as opportunities arose. By placing the Jewish family at the center of Jewish lives, the Jews have come to dominate many major industries, and they have created and preserved an ethno-state of their own. (The fact that many modern Jews have drifted away from these principles explains why the growth rate of the Jewish population worldwide is essentially zero.) If we wish to dominate, if we wish to have our own White ethno-states, we have got to “think Yiddish” and do likewise: we have got to restore the White family as the center of our society. And to do that, we have got to start having children again. Want to really strike back against Black-Run America? Want to really hit BRA where it hurts? There is an action you can take right now, right this very minute, that will do more damage to Black-Run America and the Revolution behind it than any other single action you can take. That action is: get up, get out of your chair right now, and go have unprotected sexual relations with your White husband or your White wife. In other words: have White children. As many White children as you can. Why? Jared Taylor of American Renaissance sums it up thus: “I want my children to look like their grandparents, not like Anwar Sadat or Whoopi Goldberg or Fu Manchu. This is partly for unabashedly esthetic reasons; I like the way white people look, and that’s reason enough to want white children.

It is a near-universal human desire for people to want to see themselves rather than strangers in their children [...] People of other races are no different. Most black people want black children and Asians want Asian children. When people imagine what it would be like to be a parent they imagine children who look like them. [My family], the Taylors – and their forebears – have been white for thousands of years. Suddenly to produce one who wasn’t would be as strange as joining Al Shabaab or apprenticing myself to a snake charmer. Most people who can have children of their own do so rather than adopt. That is because they understand instinctively that family is about genetic closeness” [52]. And that is why we must preserve our White genetic patrimony: because we want our kids to be White. Because we want to preserve our genetic closeness. Because we are a family. To recap: It is an indisputable fact that the Almighty does not care about the differences between the races. He made us all what we are for His own inscrutable reasons. Yet even though we are all equal in God’s eyes, we are not all equals by any other measure. We are not all the same under the skin. The Deity has created the various races and peoples, each with its differing strengths and weaknesses. These racial differences (including differences in average intelligence) are genetic, and are very real, but they are no excuse for any of that master race bunk. Each race has its own place in the natural order of things – and that’s good. In short: race is a physical, genetic reality. One’s race is a gift written in the form of DNA and handed down from generation to generation. And, like all such gifts, it is a precious thing. In the end, we Whites don’t need any scientific reasons in order to want to preserve our genetic patrimony. We want to preserve it because we love White people, and because we want White people to continue to exist. The genetic patrimony left to us by our European ancestors – our “whiteness” – should and must be preserved.

We must preserve our cultural patrimony as well. But what is our cultural patrimony? What is “White Culture”? Our Enemy knows. The Disingenuous White Liberals who run Black-Run America are so keen on destroying it. Yes, they know exactly what White culture is. Would you like to meet one of our enemies? I’ll introduce him to you. He’s the one with the pale skin, the one who grew up surrounded and nurtured by all the calm, couth, and civilized behavior created by his European and white American ancestors. Here’s what he has to say about White culture: “[W]hiteness is not an ethnicity but a dominance category and a denial mechanism; in other words, that it is empty of everything but power and forgetting.” In other words, white people don’t exist. What does he advocate? “[N]ew forms of order, involving the refusal of work and the direct assertion of collective need... to decenter the Europeanderived cultural and social perspectives and versions of history associated with ‘whiteness,’” and “draw from all traditions the means of destabilizing and subverting whiteness, for it is the central cultural form assumed by capitalist domination in this country” [53]. What is White Culture? The enemy has defined it for us. It is “order”. It is “work” for the sake of family benefit rather than for atomistic individualism or “collective need”. It is “the European-derived cultural and social perspectives and versions of history”that form ‘the central cultural form’ of our society.” Thanks for the definitions, Mr. DWL. We’ll take them. In the fall of 1872, Booker T. Washington – at the time a barely-literate Negro boy and ex-slave – was hired into the household of General Lewis Ruffner, the owner of the West Virginia salt-furnace and coal-mine where Washington and

his father worked. His job was to serve Mrs. Viola Ruffner, the wife of General Ruffner, a Yankee woman from Vermont with a reputation for being very strict with her servants, and especially with the boys who tried to serve her. “I had heard so much about Mrs. Ruffner’s severity that I was almost afraid to see her,” Washington later said, “And [I] trembled when I went into her presence. I had not lived with her many weeks, however, before I began to understand her. I soon began to learn that, first of all, she wanted everything kept clean about her, that she wanted things done promptly and systematically, and that at the bottom of everything she wanted absolute honesty and frankness. Nothing must be sloven or slipshod; every door, every fence, must be kept in repair” [54]. Booker T. Washington took away an important lesson from his service in the white Ruffner household: he learned that white people value order. “[T]he lessons that I learned in the home of Mrs. Ruffner were as valuable to me as any education I have ever gotten anywhere else. Even to this day I never see bits of paper scattered around a house or in the street that I do not want to pick them up at once. I never see a filthy yard that I do not want to clean it, a paling off of a fence that I do not want to put it on, an unpainted or unwhitewashed house that I do not want to paint or whitewash it, or a button off one’s clothes, or a grease-spot on them or on a floor, that I do not want to call attention to it” [55]. Mrs. Viola Ruffner was no aristocrat. She was in many ways a typical white woman of her day, a woman steeped in white culture. And her obsession with an orderly home is entirely typical of whites both here in abroad. The word “culture” is derived from the Latin word cultus. Cultus implies subjugation, being yoked, being under control, being grown, tended, cultivated. It implies order. White Culture is founded upon order. Order is the first criterion of White Culture. We are a people that values order. We order our homes, our lives, our work, and our leisure activities to the greatest extent possible. We

prefer to dress in a modest, orderly fashion; to deport ourselves in an restrained, orderly way; and to keep our affairs in good order to the extent possible. Our music and other arts are masterpieces of ordered sounds and images. The games we play are ordered by ironclad rules. We stand in orderly lines for tickets, for buses, for restrooms. So much do whites value order that we even wage war in order – the “rules of war”, observed by both Nazi Germany and the Allied nations in World War II, are entirely a White cultural phenomenon. (The Japanese in that war found the idea of “rules of war” to be incomprehensible, which is why the War in the Pacific was so brutally savage.) White people traditionally believe in order in their persons, possessions, and property. They traditionally keep themselves and their clothing clean, are well groomed, keep their things in good repair, and keep their homes and properties neat and tidy. Cleanliness and order in one’s property and possessions is part of White culture, and those whites who do not keep their lives in order are traditionally ostracized from the community. (This is one reason why Whites who prefer to live disorderly lives are called “white trash”.) Cleanliness is not a value exclusive to Whites, of course. Compare even the poorest working-class White, Latino and Asian neighborhood to a similar Black neighborhood and you will immediately see that this is so. Asians and Latinos in general also value cleanliness. In White culture, the love of order extends to sexual relations: marriage, monogamy, parenting. “Free love” is the Enemy’s false culture. Like energy, love can never be free: it always comes with a price, and that price is sacrifice. (“Greater love hath no man”). And there is certainly nothing loving about the practice of mating with whomever one chooses whenever the whim strikes. That is the behavior not of a cultivated, civilized man, but of an animal. And that is why the Enemy likes “free love” so much –

because it turns people into animals, mere slaves of desire, easily fooled and easily ruled. Ever wonder why White Culture has become so associated with “stiffness”, why Whites are so often portrayed as anal types who don’t know how to loosen up and have fun? That’s the Disingenuous White Liberal way of putting down another aspect of White culture: impulse control. Impulse control is the application of order to one’s emotional responses to everyday stimuli. A civilized White person (or, indeed, any civilized person of any culture) never blindly reacts to any given stimulus. Instead of going with our first impulse in a given situation, cultivated Whites respond in an ordered, rational manner. We tend to use reason, rather than emotion, to predict what is most likely to happen due to a given response. Take for example an incidence of public disrespect. Being “disrespected” is a well-known trigger of black public violence. A black person who feels he or she has been disrespected will likely react explosively. Let’s say a black man wishes to cut in line at a checkout stand in front of a White person. Most Whites have been victimized in this minor way at one time or another. I call such actions “gibsmedats” – actions taken by black who see something they want and – “Gibs me dat!” – they simply take it. Gibsmedats are a part of that suite of commonly-encountered black behaviors which Whites call Typical Negro Behavior (TNB). TNB such as a gibsmedat usually results in silent acceptance by the White person. In the checkout line example, we let them cut in line. Now imagine a White person boldly cutting into a checkout line in front of a black woman or man. What will the response be? Silent acceptance? Even a Disingenuous White Liberal isn’t stupid enough to believe that. Every White person who lives in the real world knows exactly what the result would be: an immediate and violent emotional response by the black people in line, likely

ending in physical violence. No black person is going to stand there and let a White man or woman cut in line ahead of him or her. Why the difference in responses? Simple: impulse control. Whites in general possess this ability. Blacks in general do not. A simple tale of Good versus Evil will illustrate this fact. (We’ll assume that you are the Good Guy.) Think back to the last time a black person cut in line ahead of you at a retail store. It’s not hard to do, is it? Almost all Whites have experienced this form of subtle racial hatred. When Quantavius G. Linecutter stepped into the queue ahead of you, you were angry, weren’t you? Your first impulse was to grab him by his shirt front (assuming he was wearing a shirt) and toss him to the floor. After all, you waited in line – why should he go ahead of you? Yet you didn’t do it. Instead, you stood there and took the abuse. You let that black man disrespect you. Why? Because you have impulse control. Even though every cell in your body was screaming for action, you held back, Your rational mind immediately began generating consequence scenarios: “If I do x, what consequence y might result?” Your thought process probably ran something like this: “If I throw this clown on the floor,” you thought, “I’m going to have to fight him, and I can probably beat him. On the other hand, he’s likely an ex-convict, and if so he might beat me or even kill me. Also, I’m the only White person here, which means I’ll have to fight and defeat every other black person in this line as well. And even if I win, the police are going to be called, and that means at the very least an hour or so wasted standing around while the cops figure out what’s going on. I might end up in cuffs or in jail. I can’t afford to pay for bail bonds and a lawyer right now! I just want to buy this toothbrush and go home.” So you let the black guy cut in front of you at the store and you say nothing. Evil wins.

100

A black person will almost never respond to a similar situation in such an ordered way. A White man cutting in line ahead of a black person is “disrespecting” him or her, and disrespect can never be tolerated by any black person. If you cut in line ahead of a black man or woman a bomb of instant anger will detonate inside every black person in that line. A shouting match will then follow, after which you will very likely be beaten by the entire Negro mob. Evil wins again. Don’t count on common decency to limit the conflict in such cases. Common decency tends to be exclusively a White and Yellow concept. Once a given, typical black person feels that you have “disrespected” them, “common decency” is gonna “G-O out de D-O”. The blacks in line behind you won’t be troubled by scruple. They won’t be thinking about any consequences. They won’t be thinking at all. They will be reacting blindly to their emotional impulses. Then they’ll beat you stupid. That’s Typical Negro Behavior. That’s TNB. (And what of the “good Negroes”, the honorable, decent black people we all know? They’ll be there, too, but you may rest assured that none of them will join in to help you. You know that nice black guy that sits next to you at church? He’ll be there, but he will just stand there silently watching as his black brothers and sisters give you a good, old-fashioned Reginald-Denny style Negro beatdown. Oh, sure, he’ll feel bad about it when they pull your body off that blood-slick floor, but feeling bad about it isn’t going to get you out of the hospital, now will it? (“But some of my best friends are black!” you cry. Well, that may be so. But if you think your black “best friends” are going to fight their bruthas and sustahs on your behalf you are fooling yourself.) Other examples of Typical Negro Behavior besides linecutting abound. Recognize any of these?: • Negroes being loud and disruptive in movie theaters.

101

• Negroes littering. • Negroes being intoxicated in public. • Negroes shoplifting. • Negroes engaging in various other forms of theft. • Negroes hitting, fistfighting, knifing, and shooting people at beaches, churches, on public transportation, at fireworks displays, shopping malls, sports events, parades, street celebrations after championship sporting events (win or lose), and in other public venues. All TNB. All examples of poor impulse control. All disordered behavior. Why is TNB, well, typical? Because TNB is a winning strategy in Black-Run America. If those Negroes in that checkout line beat you, why, it could only have been because you had it coming, White boy. After all, you a raciss. Sure, TNB often lands Negroes in jail, but so what? To many Negroes, jail is no big deal. Among blacks, a criminal record is far less damaging than it is for Whites. Whites have a lot to lose by going to the clink: a White man who becomes known as a jailbird or a thug places his career, property, family, and future in serious jeopardy. A typical urban Negro, by contrast, often has little to lose by doing a few months or years in slam – when you have no career, no property, no family, and no future as we would conceive it, you have nothing to lose. And, like Kris Kristofferson says, “Freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose”. Right? When you have nothing left to lose, getting arrested means nothing. Besides, the po-lice be raciss. Compared to the prospect of being disrespected by a White person, the threat of prison time is simply not that scary to the average black person. Pump weights in a cell block for a few weeks? It’s better than letting some cracker-ass White boy get one over on you. That’s TNB. That’s poor impulse control. That’s disordered behavior – and as such it is typically not part of White culture.

102

Another example of TNB: rape and sexual assault. I always laugh when I see a depiction of a prim black woman being raped by an evil, stubble-faced cracker on one of those TV cop shows. White-on-black rape is practically science fiction. Blacks commit far more rape and sexual assault per capita than do Whites. Even the most cursory examination of BRA’s own Justice Department statistics demonstrates this fact. In 2006, for example, 32,443 cases of black-on-White rape were reported, compared to zero reported cases of White-on-black rape [56]. Why the difference? Biology may play a part (the prevalence of rape in all black-majority countries is simply unbelievable), but in my opinion it isn’t the primary reason. White men are likely just as horny as black men – yet far fewer White men simply take what they want from a woman. Again, the culprit is impulse control. Sudden, public acts of violence and sexuality are actions of impulse. These impulses are initiated by the primitive part of our brains, and, in rational people, are controlled by the rational mind to prevent animalistic behavior. This sort of ordered behavior is typical of White culture. By contrast, non-whites, with the exception of Northeast Asians, tend to have poor impulse control. Like children, they react blindly and emotionally to a given stimulus. “Gibsmedat!” And it is the growth of impulsive behavior, of the gibsmedat culture since the “liberation” of blacks in America, that has so changed the face of public life in our country. “Gibsmedat!” at the store – and suddenly products have to be stored in impenetrable plastic clamshells, kept behind counters, and tied to the shelves to prevent non-Whites from stealing them. “Gibsmedat!” in the streets – and suddenly White families have to move to the hills or walk around armed to protect themselves and their children from being raped or robbed by non-Whites. “Gibsmedat!” at the voting booth – and suddenly our federal

103

and state and local governments are bleeding Whites dry in order to provide free food, housing, medical care, and privileges for non-Whites. “Gibsmedat!” in the hearts of men – and suddenly White people are forced to deny the plain evidence of their eyes and ears, hate themselves, deny their own existence, and hand over their children, their country, and their culture to non-Whites. “Gibsmedat!” TNB. Poor impulse control. Not White. To what do we owe our propensity for order? Like our DNA, it was handed down to us from our ancestors. As the authors of Hungary’s Jobbik movement note in their Manifesto: “European culture has been constructed on three pillars: Greek thinking, Roman law, and Christian morality” [57]. Thanks to this, White people bring peace, prosperity, and order wherever they go. Brown University economist Ross Levine and economist William Easterly put it this way: “A large literature suggests that European settlement outside of Europe shaped institutional, educational, technological, cultural, and economic outcomes [...] We find a remarkably strong impact of colonial European settlement on development. According to one illustrative exercise, 47 percent of average global development levels today are attributable to Europeans.” Citing “the positive effect of even a small minority European population during the colonial period on per capita income today”, Levine and Easterly conclude that “our findings are most consistent with human capital playing a central role in the way that colonial European settlement affects development today.” In short, Levine and Edwards hold that “the proportion of Europeans during the early colonial period [of a given non=European country] had a lasting effect beyond endowments and political institutions—Europeans brought factors that fostered long-run economic development [58]. One need only compare and contrast typically White cultural values with those typical of Negroes to see what being White is all about. To Whites, the home (in Greek, oikos, oikos) is the economic and social center of life. Blacks, by contrast, pride

104

themselves on being “down wit’ da street”. Widely-distributed private property and individual enterprise are important in White culture. Blacks in general prefer communal property and community action. Innovation and invention are central to White culture. Native Africans never invented the wheel, a written language, or art as such. There’s more to White culture than these things, of course. Yet, while no culture can ever be completely defined, one can definitively say that these endowments and many others are part of what we mean when we saw “White culture”. But lest anyone accuse me of refusing to See reality as it is, I’d like to take a few moments to talk about those members of the White race who do not display the hallmarks of White culture. Such people do exist, and are far from rare. These uncultivated Whites make up the segment of the Caucasian population commonly called White Trash. Remember back a few chapters when we were discussing psychopathic behavior? You’ll recall the behaviors typical of the psychopath: glib and superficial charm, grandiosity, the need for constant stimulation, pathological lying, conning and manipulating, lack of remorse, callousness, and poor behavioral controls, You’ll remember that such antisocial personalities displayed excessive impulsivity, irresponsibility, an inability to live a stable, responsible life in the company of other people, and a tendency toward sudden, explosive anger, criminal behavior, and senseless violence. You’ll remember that we called this Typical Negro Behavior (TNB) – that is, the kind of bad behavior we all see every day on the part of many American black people. But there is another group of Americans whose typical behaviors show the signs of antisocial personality disorder. These people are known by a variety of names, but the label most commonly hung on them is “trash”. These are the individuals one might call “The Other White People” – that is, White Trash.

105

Now, I don’t like to call anybody “trash”. It’s like the word “nigger” in that it tends to reduce a human being to something less than human. While I may not enjoy the company of most black people, and while I may choose to avoid them and their typically pathological behaviors, I do recognize them as my fellow human beings, however different from Whites they may be. Likewise, while I dislike uncultivated, low-class Whites and I avoid them whenever possible, even the most trashy white man is a man. But I choose to use the term “white trash” and not “nigger” for one simple reason: free will. A black person can’t help but be black, and to dehumanize him with a slur over something he or she cannot help is stupid and counterproductive. Negroes don’t choose to be Negroes. Black people are born black. But nobody is born trash. One may be both poor and White, but one need not be poor white trash. Trash is a choice. And I insist on holding White people responsible for their choices to the same degree as I do blacks or others. White trash behavior hurts the White race. It gives the Disingenuous White Liberals an easy target. It gives BlackRun America a convenient, readily-identifiable bad guy with which to identify Whites as a whole. Just as trash-talking, deliberately-ignorant, status-obsessed black thugs, pimps, and hos tend to give all blacks a bad name, poorly-spoken, deliberately-ignorant, status-obsessed White trash tend to make all Whites look bad. Want to help the White cause? Police yourself and your friends for trashy behaviors and work to become a cultivated person. Speak carefully and respectfully when in public, avoiding dialect and profanity and using standard American English. Respect “book learning” and overcome your resentment toward people who are smarter or better-educated than yourself. Quit trying to prop up your weak ego by buying fancy, glitzy status symbols. Live simply and frugally instead. Respect the elderly, the young, and those of the opposite sex. Display good manners. Avoid tattoos and flashy piercings.

106

Dress simply and modestly, never in vulgar or revealing clothing. Study the great works of literature, music, and art, and avoid lowbrow entertainment. Save and invest your money instead of spending it. Get married and stay married. Raise your children well. Pray, worship, and love God as best you can, and obey His commandments. Live an orderly life. Control your impulses. In other words: act White. Those who are trash choose to be trash. Those who choose to be trash should not blame me or others for calling them what they are. Our Enemy is right. European-derived cultural and social perspectives are the central cultural form in this country. We are for good order. They deny the need for it. We are for productive work – the economy (oικονομiα) of the home (oikos), of economy centered upon family business, upon widespread capital, upon craftsmanship and creation. They are for Big corporations, big bucks, and big government – the culture of welfare, of equality, of “Gibsmedat.” White Culture is based in reality, the kind with winners and losers, the kind where results count and excuses do not. The Enemy’s false culture is constructed upon the lies of “fairness”, “equality”, and forced “sharing”, a culture where “everyone is a winner” just for playing.. We are for White behaviors, values, and traditions. They are for... anything else. D. OVERTHROWING BLACK-RUN AMERICA Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that [American black] people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. – Thomas Jefferson

107

In the wake of the 1992 Los Angeles race riots, Rodney King – the late career criminal whose videotaped beating by police triggered the event – looked around at the death and destruction his fellow blacks had created. “People,” he famously asked, “I just want to say, you know, can we all get along?” And the answer, all these years later, is a clear and resounding “No.” The Dream says that we should judge people by the content of their character rather than their skin color. On the streets of America, in the Real World, the Dream has no meaning. It’s all Reality. And in reality, White people and others have to judge people by their skin color if they want to survive. People may claim color blindness, but when they are on the street their color sensors are turned all the way to 11. Racial prejudice is a survival skill. And nobody likes to hear that. I certainly don’t. It’s unpleasant to face the facts about race in America. No person of good will likes lumping all the members of a given race together in the “potential threat” category. No person of good will wants to give up on Dr. King’s dream. But the reality is that White America and Black America are two separate nations. They have two different and incompatible cultures. As long as blacks and Whites are forced by to live together by Disingenuous White Liberals bent on creating a colorless Utopia, an eventual race war in America becomes a certainty. But blacks and Whites can live in peace. We know this because they have done so for centuries.They simply can’t live together in peace. We can end the War on White People, we can head off the coming Race War in America, and we can stop the coming of the global Revolutionary State by getting rid of the institutions that will bring them about. We can stop them by destroying Black-Run America.

108

Destroying BRA doesn’t require troops or guns. It doesn’t mean bringing back segregated washrooms and water fountains down at the courthouse. All we have to do is to repeal the laws which serve as its constitution, the most important of which are the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Immigration Act of 1965. In 1789, the United States Constitution was ordained and established to create a Union, a political entity intended to protect and advance the interests of the “posterity” of those who founded it — that is, White, property-owning Christian males. Less than two hundred years later, that Constitution had become a sad joke. White people tend to be very patriotic. They quote the Constitution with pride. They fight in the country’s wars. They stand at attention when the flag is displayed and sing “The Star-Spangled Banner”. But the truth is that the country that flag stands for is dead. It has been dead for at least one hundred and fifty years. And the Federal Entity which succeeded the constitutional federal Government of the United States is diametrically opposed to the intents and purposes of the framers of the Constitution. It’s for damned certain that Washington no longer acts to protect and advance the interests of the “posterity” of those who founded the country — that is, White, property-owning Christian males. With the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, for example, the power of the constitutional Union was used to create a bastard society, a society with two cultures. BlackRun America, the War on White People, and the growing anger and violence between White and black are the direct result of this law. The passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and subsequent law directly led to the destruction of the traditional order of race relations in America and to the imposition of a revolutionary “multicultural” society at the tip of the Federal bayonet.

109

The first thing we have to do in order to overthrow BRA is to break the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Not every part of the Act is evil, of course. It did correct some genuine injustices. One such injustice was the segregation of public facilities. We’ve all seen the photos: two drinking fountains at a public park, side by side, one marked with a sign reading “WHITES”, the other with a sign reading “COLORED”; two bathrooms at a public library, same signs; WHITE and COLORED seating in courtrooms; and so forth. Few people, White or black, would approve of such segregation today. We all pay taxes, we all “own” these public facilities, and they should be equally open to all. Title III of the Act prohibits state and municipal governments from denying access to public facilities on grounds of race, color, religion or national origin, a ban that even the most hardcore crusaders for the White cause seldom object to. But despite the good done by Title III, the other sections of the Act have been disastrous. Take Title IV for example. This part of the Act “encouraged” ( = mandated) the desegregation of public schools and authorized the U.S. Attorney General to file suits to enforce said act. School desegregation itself was nothing new, of course: ten years before the passage of the Civil Rights Act, the United States Supreme Court had ruled (in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 [1954]) that state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students were unconstitutional. This decision was extremely unpopular. Every white person in America knew very well what would happen when black kids started going to White schools. But by 1954 the Disingenuous White Liberal class had captured the Federal Entity, and they weren’t taking “no” for an answer. It took threats, intimidation, and ultimately the use of naked military force by the Federal Entity to integrate America’s schools. In September 1957, the Court ordered the all-white Little

110

Rock, Arkansas school district to admit nine black students to the city’s Central High School. White citizens of the city rose in protest, and the governor of Arkansas called out the state National Guard to prevent the black students from entering the building. This was an affront the Federal Entity could not tolerate. President Dwight D. Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard and sent the 101st Airborne Division of the United States Army into Little Rock to force the integration of the school. These American soldiers turned their guns on the White protestors and forced them to watch as the nine black students were escorted into their school by U.S. Marshals. America’s schools were integrated at gunpoint. The end of segregation in public schools, like the end of segregation in other public facilities, makes sense in theory. After all, the public schools belong to the taxpayers, and like other public facilities they ought to be open equally to all taxpayers — in theory. Unfortunately, in practice, racial desegregation of public schools has been a disaster. The minute the schools were desegregated, federal courts ordered White schools to begin shipping in ghetto black students by the bus load — and our public schools disintegrated into a chaos of violence, squalor, and crime. Just as the White people on the pointy ends of the Army’s bayonets in Little Rock in 1957 knew they would. White Flight was the result. White people saw the results of school desegregation immediately, and in the starkest light. Joe and Jane Middleclass took one look at little Jimmy’s bloody, tear-stained face, one look at little Susie’s torn dress and shattered innocence, and got the hell out of Dodge. Joe and Jane Middleclass saw test scores at Jimmy and Susie’s school drop through the floor and bugged out for the suburbs. Joe and Jane Middleclass watched once-beautiful public schools filled with well-scrubbed White children become dilapidated, graffiti-encrusted hellholes populated by swaggering black

111

thugs and screeching black harpies – and hit the road. The passage of Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a disaster. It certainly did not end segregation. Today’s schools are more segregated than ever. Title IV created Suburbia, filled the seats of private schools across the land, and sparked the ongoing explosion of homeschooling in America. And it made plain the obsolescence of the idea of public education itself. Were it not for the tremendous lobbying power of the professional education industry, Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 would have ended public education in America. The other sections of the Act are similarly harmful. They create a federal “race police” and bureaucracy; they mandate race-based federal hiring policies; they set the stage for the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which ended the states’ ability to verify the eligibility of people to vote in elections. But by far the most damaging sections of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are Titles II and V, for these laws destroyed the freedom of association enjoyed by citizens of the United States. They did it by destroying the distinction between public life and private property in our country. Prior to 1964, Congress had little power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals or organizations on private property. Prior to 1964, the United States Supreme Court had consistently defended this limitation of federal power. But after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, any limit on federal power ended. Title II of the Civil Rights Act outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other “public accommodations” engaged in “interstate commerce”. Subsequent court decisions and legislation have made it plain that “public accommodation” means “any place other than a private, members-only club”. If you own a restaurant, a retail store, a hotel or motel, or any other business, the

112

Federal Entity says that you must admit black people whether you want to or not. That’s right: your business may represent your hard work, your investment, and your risk, but you no longer have the right to say who can and cannot come onto your private property. You have no say. You have no choice. If you keep a black man from entering your property, or even make him think you might want to do so, you are a lawbreaker under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a just and civilized world, in a free country, the owners of a private property would be free to admit or deny admission to anyone on any basis they might choose. It’s their property, after all. But private property isn’t. Not in America. Not any more. Not since Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed. Not since Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (379 U.S. 241 [1964]) and Daniel v. Paul (395 U.S. 298 [1969]) were handed down. (For more on these decisions see below.) Not since the so-called Fair Housing act of 1968 (Pub.L. 90-284, 82 Stat. 73 [1968]) made it through Congress. Thanks to these statutes and court decisions, the right of the people to freely associate on private property no longer exists in the United States. “Private” property in America ultimately belongs to the federal civil rights apparatus, and to the Disingenuous White Liberals who run it. In their infinite wisdom, our betters have decreed that black people have the right to go wherever they want, and to hell with your comfort, your safety, and your liberty. And don’t think you can get away with racial discrimination by converting your lunch counter, swimming pool, or country club into a private club. The Federal Entity never defines “private” in the Civil Rights Act, which is of course the same as saying that in any given case, “private” means whatever the Federal Entity says it means. Go ahead, try making your business or organization a members-only outfit. You will find that the federal civil rights police have another trick up their sleeves: the Commerce Clause. Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution

113

states that the Congress shall have power “To regulate Commerce… among the several States”. This clause is the key that gives the Federal Entity the power to pick the lock of your private organization and force you to admit anyone that wants in. With one Supreme Court decision (the above-mentioned Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 [1964]), Congress ruled that a privately-owned motor inn could not turn away black travelers on the basis of race. By doing so, it gave itself the power to regulate any business that serves “interstate travelers” – which of course means every business in America. After all, every alley, street, and road in America is connected at some point to a road that crosses a state line. Every airport, bus station, and train station in America is connected to the nationwide transportation grid in some fashion. Therefore, if your business or organization is accessible by road, street, or path, by air, or by any other means, it “serves interstate travelers”, and is subject to Congress’ racial justice laws. Another Court decision (Daniel v. Paul, 395 U.S. 298 [1969], mentioned above), ruled that a privately-owned swimming facility in Arkansas couldn’t keep out black kids. Never mind that the club and its facilities were 100% privately-owned. Never mind that the place was a strictly local operation. The Federal Entity decided that since three out of the four items sold at the facility’s snack bar were purchased from outside the state, the owners were engaged in “interstate commerce” – and their swimming facility was therefore subject to regulation under Title II of the Civil Rights Act, which defines “commerce” as “[T]ravel, trade, traffic, commerce, transportation, or communication among the several States, or between the District of Columbia and any State, or between any foreign country or any territory or possession and any State or the District of Columbia, or between points in the same State but through any other State or the District of Columbia or a foreign country.” With a definition of “commerce” that broad, no one can escape. The club’s owners never had a chance. “The snack bar

114

serves a limited fare-hot dogs and hamburgers on buns, soft drinks, and milk,” wrote the Court in its decision. But, since “principal ingredients going into the bread were produced and processed in other States” and “certain ingredients [of the soft drinks] were probably obtained… from out-of State sources”, it said, then “there can be no serious doubt that a ‘substantial portion of the food’ served at the snack bar has moved in interstate commerce...” And thus the entire members-only, privately-owned facility fell within the ambit of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and its owners had to admit black people to their private property whether they wanted to or not. What this means to you is that you are no longer free. Even if you have a private club, even if it is owned by the members, and even if you keep the club’s address and phone number totally secret, your club is almost certainly a “public accommodation” and is subject to federal anti-discrimination law. After all, the light bulbs used in your clubhouse were made in China. That’s interstate commerce! The air filter in your clubhouse’s air conditioner was bought at a store owned by a company in Arkansas. Interstate commerce again! The coffee you serve at the clubhouse bar was grown in Hawaii. Interstate commerce, baby! No matter how private your club may be, no matter how exclusive its membership, no matter how remote its location, as far as BRA is concerned your club is engaging in interstate commerce, and is therefore subject to the ever-loving Civil Rights Act of 1964. Unless your private business or club is completely isolated from the rest of the world — located in a self-contained bubble floating in outer space, perhaps – it is engaged in interstate commerce, and you as its owner must let black people in whether you want to or not. The law is clear. Under Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, every business, club, and other organization or facility is a “public accommodation”, or is engaged in “interstate commerce”, or both. Let Negroes onto your private property or else. That is

115

what we are laughing at when we laugh at the idea of White Privilege. That is what we mean when we say that America has become Black-Run America. Again: In 1789, the United States Constitution was ordained and established to create a Union, a political entity intended to protect and advance the interests of the “posterity” of those who founded it — that is, White, property-owning Christian males. Today, the post-constitutional Federal Entity is operated on behalf of everybody except White, property-owning Christian males. Think about that, White man, the next time you have the urge to stand up and sing “The Star-Spangled Banner”. Think about that, White man, the next time you have the urge to send your son or daughter off to fight for the Grand Old Flag. That flag no longer represents you. The Entity for which it stands considers you and everyone like you to be the enemy. It wasn’t enough for the Disingenuous White Liberals to destroy White America’s workplaces, schools, and streets. They knew they had to destroy White America where it lived – in its neighborhoods. In the old, free America, property owners enjoyed their right of free association by means of restrictive covenants. What is a restrictive covenant? According to West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, a restrictive covenant is “a clause in a deed or lease to real property that limits what the owner of the land or lease can do with the property. Restrictive covenants allow surrounding property owners, who have similar covenants in their deeds, to enforce the terms of the covenants in a court of law.” These covenants “were used to prevent minorities from moving into residential neighborhoods. A group of homeowners would agree not to sell or rent their homes to African Americans, Jews, and other minorities by including this restriction in their real estate deeds.”

116

Unfair? Maybe. But private property is supposed to be private – a supposition that was commonly supported by law: “[T]his form of private discrimination,” West’s tells us, “was legal because the state was not involved.” Then in 1948 came Shelley v. Kraemer [334 U.S. 1, 68 S. Ct. 836, 92 L. Ed. 1161 (1948)]. In this landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that race/religion/ethnic-based restrictive covenants were unenforceable by the states, “because any such enforcement would amount to State Action in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution”. In other words, any racially restrictive covenant became legally unenforceable in state courts because it is prima facie in violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”) [59]. It is worth noting that the amicus curiae brief in Shelley was filed by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). But even the Supreme Court couldn’t break White America’s final line of defense: the free market. While restrictive covenants were no longer enforceable, White people still had the freedom to determine where to invest their own money – and for the mortgage lenders of America, blacks were (and are) a bad risk. Lenders, knowing from statistics that Whites tended to pay off such mortgages and that property values in white neighborhoods tended to remain high, could invest with confidence in White mortgages. They were understandably less confident about lending to blacks. The freedom of lenders to choose worthy borrowers on their own terms used to be called the free market. It now goes by the ugly name of “redlining”. When redlinin was permitted, Whites could put their money into a mortgage with the expectation

117

of living in a clean, peaceful white neighborhood – no matter what the Supreme Court said. The Civil Rights Act of 1968 [Pub.L. 90-284, 82 Stat. 73, aka the Fair Housing Act] destroyed redlining – and with it White America’s last bastion. This federal legislation made freedom of association illegal with regard to residential private property. It forbade all “discrimination” in housing – rented or owned – on the basis of race or color. Restrictive covenants became illegal by statute. Redlining was similarly outlawed. A federal race police (the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity) was created by this act to make certain that White people would have to live around blacks whether they wanted to or not. Yet despite this avalanche of federal law forbidding racial segregation, the neighborhoods inhabited by Disingenuous White Liberals somehow seem to stay a whiter shade of pale. Here’s a fun game: every time some DWL tool spouts off about the glories of diversity on TV on in print or on the Internet, look up his or her home address. Then research the ethnic composition of the neighborhood in which that address is located. Surprise! The same DWLs that want you to live in Diversity Acres all seem to make their own homes in Whiteytown, USA! What a coincidence! A Disingenuous White Liberal is a person who believes in the motto “Diversity for Thee, but Not for Me.” They blather on about the joy of having a diverse workplace – as long as it’s your workplace that’s diverse. A Disingenuous White Liberal is a person who believes that a neighborhood with a “vibrant mix of colors and cultures” is the best place to live – as long as it’s your neighborhood that ends up being “vibrant”. A Disingenuous White Liberal is a person who believes that blacks and whites can, should, and must attend the same public schools – as long as his or her own kids get to study at a snow-white private school. And it is the Disingenuous White Liberal that has created Black-Run America.

118

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its subsequent legislation and case law effectively ended the institution of private property in this land, and by so doing have destroyed freedom of association in our country. If we are going to restore the America we love, we must break BRA’s false constitution. These laws in their current form have got to go. Blacks and whites can coexist. History proves it. Blacks and whites lived side by side in the South for three hundred years — separately. White privilege really did exist in those days – and it was this privilege that made this peaceful coexistence possible. Why? Because privilege is earned, not granted. In the America of Once Upon a Time, White people enjoyed white privilege — because they had earned it. Look around you. The world we know was created by White people. From Aristotelian logic to astronautics, from musical notation to microchips, from scientific autopsy to antibiotics, from cave painting to cinema, was in most part created by and for people of European genetics and heritage. Yes, people from every culture and color contributed to the modern world, but civilization as we know it today is essentially a product of the race of Europe. And as the creators of this modern world, Whites act as its natural elite. “In every society,” says economist Dr. HansHerman Hoppe, “a few individuals acquire the status of an elite through talent. Due to superior achievements of wealth, wisdom, and bravery, these individuals come to possess natural authority” [60]. And what is true of individuals is likely true of societies as well. If White people were once an elite, it is because White people earned the title. And it was under the domination of this White elite that both Whites and blacks reached the pinnacle of excellence. That’s right, kids: White control of society benefitted both blacks and Whites. Under White control, Negroes in America reached the high point of their own culture — the Harlem Renaissance of

119

the 1920s. Think of where blacks might be today if the natural racial order had been allowed to continue! But World War II changed everything. Repelled by the Third Reich’s quest to empower the “Aryan” master race, White America scrambled to dismantle its own racial order. Any law, custom, or attitude that distinguished between persons on the basis of race — no matter how small the distinction, no matter how rooted in reality it might be — became immediately associated with barbed wire and gas chambers. The DWLs took control, imposing by law integration in America. In the North, where blacks were not commonly encountered by members of the White elites in their daily lives, this new America was seen as a good thing. And it’s no wonder: integration cost most Northerners nothing. But in the South, Whites lived in daily proximity to Blacks. And the White elite knew very well what the destruction of the natural social order would bring: chaos, and the tyranny that always follows it. And they were right. ___ The family is the association established by nature for the supply of men’s everyday wants... But when several families are united, and the association aims at something more than the supply of daily needs, the first society to be formed is the village. And the most natural form of the village appears to be that of a colony from the family, composed of the children and grandchildren... When several villages are united in a single complete community, large enough to be nearly or quite selfsufficing, the state comes into existence, originating in the bare needs of life, and continuing in existence for the sake of a good life. And therefore, if the earlier forms of society are natural, so is the state, for it is the end of them, and the nature of a thing is its end. For what each thing is when fully developed, we call its nature, whether we are speaking of a man, a horse, or a family.

120

Besides, the final cause and end of a thing is the best, and to be self-sufficing is the end and the best. Hence it is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that man is by nature a political animal. – Aristotle, Politics, I, ii Man is a political animal. Where men live, they live in society with one another. This society is organic, meaning it emerges spontaneously out of the natural relations between individual human beings. (Contrast this with the Revolutionary desire to impose an artificial order out of chaos.) Politics, and all society, starts with the individual. But contrary to what you have been taught, the fundamental unit of human society is not the individual. As Aristotle points out, the primary society exhibited by human beings is the natural human family, consisting of one man and one woman united in matrimony, and their offspring. The next level of human society consists of the parents and siblings (if any) of both husband and wife, along with their siblings’ children. Father, mother, sons, daughters, grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins together – this extended family forms the nucleus of the ethnos, or tribe – a group of families which are descended from a common ancestor. And where an ethnos exists, culture is certain to emerge. Culture is based upon the cult, the set of beliefs about the fundamental aspects of human existence and reality itself held in common by the members of a given ethnos. Culture is not something that is defined by voting or decreed by warlords or tribal leaders. It is never imposed. Culture proceeds organically from each ethnos. Culture unites the members of an ethnos, damping down clan rivalries by binding their various members into a single unit by ties that transcend blood and marriage. An ethnos bound together in this way transcends yet again, and becomes the largest of the natural units of human society: the nation.

121

The Sage’s next entry in his list of natural politics is the polis polis, the city-state, a collection of ethnic groups united by culture. Ethnos + Culture = Polis – or, as we would call it today: the Nation. Athens was a nation. Sparta was a nation. Both were ethnically Greek, but culturally they were worlds apart. And so it was war, a war that led in the end to the destruction of the Hellenic civilization. It took Alexander the Great to pick up the pieces. If history teaches us anything, it is that each nation must be sovereign in its own territory. Nations may cooperate with one another in situations where their interests are similar, but they cannot naturally coexist “under one roof”; that is, two nations cannot coexist in peace within a single State. In any such shared entity, nation will battle nation for control of the State until one gains the upper hand, at which point the dominant nation either imposes its culture on the other nations by force, sets up an apartheid “homeland” for the other nation within its borders, or ethnically cleanses the other nation from existence. The examples of this are almost too numerous to list: the never-ending strife between Muslim and Hindu in India; the endless ethnic warfare of the Balkans; the constant drip, drip, drip of blood from Ireland; the countless unknown wars of the Caucasus; the simmering fracophone/anglophone confict in Canada; and many more. The only way a multinational, multicultural state can exist is one held together is by brute force. Every multicultural State is and must be a tyranny. History again shows the truth. Only force could have held the Soviet “Union” together. The USSR was never a nation. It was a multinational proposition state, a state founded by a liberal elite and based upon a political ideology (Bolshevism). Love and tolerance were not what kept the population of Russians, Ukranians, Georguans, Byelorussians, and others together as “the Soviet Union”. It was force – force wielded

122

first by a Supreme Soviet, then by a socialist dictator, Josef Vissarionovich Stalin. Stalin kept the USSR together by keeping his boot on the necks of the Russians, Ukranians, Georgians, and others who lived there. And once he was gone, once that boot and those of his successors was removed, the USSR gradually disintegrated back into nations, and is even now involved in a number of bloody ethnic wars that will end only when one nation or another becomes supreme. Yugoslavia was never a nation. It was a multinational proposition state, a state founded by a liberal elite and based upon a political ideology (“South Slavic Unity”). Love and tolerance were not what kept the population of Bosniaks, Serbs, Montenegrins, Slovenes, and others together as “Yugoslavia”. It was force – force wielded first by a king, then by a socialist dictator, Josef Broz Tito. Tito kept Yugoslavia together by keeping his boot on the necks of the Serbs, Bosnians, Slovaks, and others who lived there. And once he was gone, once that boot was removed, Yugoslavia disintegrated back into nations by means of a bloody ethnic war that will end only when one nation or another becomes supreme. America is like the USSR, like Yugoslavia. Since the end of White supremacy in the 1950s, and perhaps even begore that, it has ceased to be a nation. It is now a multinational proposition state, a state founded by a liberal elite and based upon a political ideology (“Political Correctness”). Our American polis is not united by a common culture. Nor do ties of kinship keep our ethnic nations – blacks, Latinos, Asians, Whites, and others – together as “America”. It is force that unites the American polis – naked force wielded by the Federal Entity at the command of the Disingenuous White Liberals and on behalf of the Revolution. Black-Run America is kept together by Uncle Sam’s boot on the necks of the blacks, Latinos, Asians, Whites, and others who live here. And once Uncle Sam is gone, once that boot is removed, the

123

“united states” of America will disintegrate back into nations by means of a bloody ethnic war that will end only when one nation or another becomes supreme. Our goal as White people is not to topple Uncle Sam. That’s not our job. The collapse of the current social, economic, and political system going to happen without our help. Instead, our task is to establish our identity; to strengthen ourselves, our faith, and our families; and to prepare to ride out the disintegration so that we may rise from the rubble and establish supremacy in a land of our own. C. A NEW CONFEDERACY But how can we Whites in America have a land of our own? The answer is simple: nationalism and secession. In a recent essay, a well-known American science fiction writer proposed that the United States of America will be seen by our descendants one thousand years hence as a new Rome, an empire where the modern-day equivalents of the Slav and the German were both equally Roman. I think she’s right. Unfortunately, such a “Rome” cannot last. Because, in the long run, no empire ever lasts. Let’s look at Rome. The Roman Empire was nothing more than a body politic within which a single ethnic and cultural group, the Romans (an amalgam of Latin tribes) was able to force the Germans, the Slavs, and other ethnic and cultural groups to accept its own culture and laws. The moral and biological collapse of the original Roman stock destroyed this body politic. And, as the ability of the Romans to impose their culture and laws upon the various tribes within the Empire decreased, the loyalty of the Germans and the Slavs defaulted back to their respective tribes. In truth, they never were really loyal to Rome at all; they were simply “under the thumb” of the

124

Romans. And when the Romans were no longer willing or able to maintain their dominance, the Empire ended — dismembered by the formerly “Roman” Slavs, Germans, etc. The same is true in our “Rome”. The United States of America as it once existed was nothing more than a body politic within which an single ethnic and cultural group, the White Americans (an amalgam of European tribes), was able to force the Hispanic Americans, the Afro-American slaves, and other ethnic and cultural groups to accept its own culture and laws. The moral and biological collapse of the original White stock has destroyed this body politic. And, as the ability of White Americans to impose their culture and laws upon the various tribes within the U.S.A. has decreased, the loyalty of the Hispanic Americans and the Afro-Americans has defaulted back to their respective tribes. In truth, they never were really loyal to the U.S.A. at all; they were simply “under the thumb” of the White Americans. And now that White Americans are no longer willing or able to maintain their dominance, the U.S.A. is ending — an “empire” soon to be dismembered by the formerly “American” Hispanic and Black tribes. Hard words? Hard truths. But reality doesn’t care how you feel about things. Things are as they are, and no amount of anger or disbelief will change them. And the reality of human social relations is that propositional nations —“nations” founded upon ideology, political party, or constitution — cannot survive for long. They are artificial structures, imposed upon people from without, and as such will always fail sooner or later. Rome was a propositional nation. The U.S.A. is a propositional nation. Every propositional state is, in the final analysis, an empire — an entity held together by naked force. That’s what Rome was. That what the U.S.A. is. We look back at the glory that was Rome and we wonder:

125

how did the Romans let it all fall apart? My answer is that the decline and fall of the Roman Empire was unavoidable. Empires always fall apart. In like manner, our descendants will look at us and ask themselves how we could have let our civilization come to this. I think they will agree that the fall of our empire was just as inevitable. So what are we to do? If the fall of the empire is coming, how are we to survive? I think that the answer lies in nationalism — a nationalism based not upon hatred but upon love. I ask you therefore to consider my words in the light of reality — the reality you see every day, with your own eyes, not media “reality” — and decide for yourself which mode of social organization has the best chance of survival over the long term: a nation, like Germany, or an empire like Rome? When I say “nationalism”, I mean real nationalism, a nationalism based upon real nations — that is, upon people who are tied together by ethnicity, language, and culture. A real nation is organic — it emerges from the natural relations between people, rather than being imposed upon them. Thus rooted in the rock of reality, a nation can survive until the end of time. The Roman Empire is gone, but Germany is still there. And a tide of nationalism is sweeping the world. From Scotland to South Africa, from the Middle East to the Deep South, more and more people are deciding they have had enough of the Empire — that is, of whatever proposition “nation” they have been part of. This new nationalism is not born of hatred but of love — not from hatred of the Other, but love of one’s Own. As such, it is entirely in keeping with the spirit of universal brotherhood and political subsidiarity found in the Christian faith. Nationalism is a beautiful idea. People have grown tired of being subsumed by multi-ethnic, multicultural “propositional empires” which exist only on the basis of ideology or politics.

126

Ethnic and nationalist separatism is exploding throughout the world. From Siberia to South Africa, from Flanders to French Guiana, ethnic and racial separatist movements are becoming bolder and more prominent. In some cases, such as Catalonia, they are on the verge of success. As a White nationalist, I advocate for the establishment of an explicitly and constitutionally White ethnostate here in America. I recognize, however, that the odds of this state being realized within the near future are small. White identity in America has been lost; until it can be rediscovered, most White Americans’ primary loyalty will remain with the state which they call home, not with the White Diaspora in America. Bearing this in mind, I hold that a constitutionally White ethnostate will not be possible in the near term. Any nationalist activity within the current political and social order will be in terms of the extant fifty American states, or some combination of same. Which states? Among the fifty states, four — Hawaii, Texas, Vermont, and Alaska — boast active and vital nationalist movements, with Hawaii’s being perhaps the most advanced among these. (Puerto Rico, while not a state, also has a large and powerful independence movement.) But the primary candidate for secession from the federal entity is that loose union of states once known as the Confederate States of America. Why? Because Dixie is a real nation. With their defeat and physical conquest by the forces of the federal Union in the War Between the States, the states of the southern Confederacy were forcibly re-incorporated into the United States of America. Yet, despite armed conquest, decades of occupation, the destruction of traditional manual agriculture, the forced integration of her White and Black populations, and the homogenization of culture and lifestyles by means of highways, capitalism, and the mass media, the

127

South has never really ceased to exist. Millions of people identify as Southerners, Rebels, and Confederates to this day. The Confederate battle flag still flies all across the South. And the unique culture of the South, from home cooking to the various dialects of Southern English, testify to the enduring existence of the Confederacy as a living entity. But does the continuing existence of the South qualify it as a true nation? And, if so, might this nation somehow move toward a new, independent Confederacy — a Republic of Dixie? I believe the answer to both of these questions is “yes”. By the definition of “nation” I have outlined above, Dixie is certainly a nation. It is a society within defined and recognized borders — the borders of the former C.S.A. It is united by a national identity: European ethnicity, the English language, and Christian culture. All Dixie lacks is its independence, and a government of some kind. One assumes that a government along the lines of that enjoyed by the former Confederate States of America could be established in a fairly straightforward manner should circumstances permit. What the South needs, then, is independence. How to get it? Secession. Secession is happening. It’s happening all over the world. As the universalism of the Global Luciferian Revolution begins to bite, nationalism is biting back. Examples of nationalist movements abound: Jobbik in Hungary; the Catalonian and Basque separatist movements in Spain; Lega Nord, advocating a Padania independent of Italy; the powerful Flemish and Walloon separatists of Belgium; South Africa’s Volkstaat, Orania, and Cape Republic advocates; and many more, on every inhabited continent of the world. Here in North America, secessionist and nationalist groups have appeared as well, from Quebec to Puerto Rico, from Hawaii to Vermont, and everywhere in between. The nationalist movement of Scotland is an example. Scotland, as everyone knows, is part of the United Kingdom. But the UK is growing less united year by year. Independence

128

and nationalist movements have arisen across Britain, from Cornwall to Yorkshire and from Wales to Essex. Among them, however, the Scottish nationalist movement stands as the greatest and most successful. Scotland, an independent nation from time immemorial, was united to England by concurrent acts of the English and the Scottish parliaments in 1706 and 1707 respectively. These Acts of Union led to the integration of the two national parliaments and made Scotland a part of the unitary state known today as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Thanks to decades of political effort by the Scottish National Party (SNP) and other groups, this union of three hundred years now tilts in favor of the Scots. Since 1998, Scotland has had its own parliament in Edinburgh, which has over the past fifteen years assumed from the UK certain national powers — a process called “devolution”. In the fall of 2014, a referendum on Scottish nationalism revealed that most Scots preferred keeping Scotland within the UK. This has been heralded as proof that proposition states can work, and that people prefer to live in multicultural, multiethnic societies such as the United Kingdom. Is this the lesson of the Scottish example? Do Scots prefer to stay in Union with England, Northern Ireland, and Wales out of love — or did the canny Scots simply decide to remain under the rule of Parliament because Scottish politicians have dominated and continue to dominate that body on behalf of Scotland? Whatever the reality of the Scottish example, the lessons of history are clear. The first is that nationalism can succeed only when centered upon an actual nation — a society within defined and recognized borders and a populace united by a national identity (ties of ethnicity, language, and culture). This bears directly upon the possibility of a revived Condeferate States. The first step towards an independent Dixie would be to set up a credible Southern political movement, independent of all other parties and struggling

129

for the reconstitution of the South as an independent and sovereign state. Whether this new Southern state is to be called the Confederate States of America, the Republic of Dixie, or by some other name is irrelevant at the outset. The primary goal of the Dixie nationalist movement should be to establish a Southern identity among the White people of the nation — that is, to raise the racial consciousness of the White people of the South. I believe that this step is well under way. The League of the South and other groups are doing yeoman’s work in raising national consciousness among Southerners. They must continue to educate White Southerners about the everincreasing centralization of power by the Federal Entity, and the increasing demographic and electoral dominance of nonWhites and non-Southerners in the USA. The better they do this, the more the White residents of Dixie will be driven to the realization that they are part of a separate nation — a nation with interests the Federal Entity will not protect. Once ten percent or so of the White people of the Southland come to this realization, the second step can be taken. The second step that should be taken is the establishment of a Southern nationalist party. Like the Scottish National Party, this group (call it the Dixie National Party, or DNP) would be legally incorporated and would run candidates for state and local elective offices on an explicitly pro-Dixie platform. No mention of outright independence should be made in the early days of this process; the objective should be to put proSouthern candidates into positions of political influence at the state and local level. The ultimate goal would be to elect DNP majorities in Southern state legislatures, and to put DNP governors in state capitols. All this done well, the penultimate step of the Scottish process could begin: devolution. This would take the form of a strong State Rights movement at the national level. The DNP would run candidates in national elections, with the goal of electing DNP congressmen.

130

Over time, the DNP would gradually leech traditionalist conservatives and covert pro-Whites from the ranks of the Republican Party and establish itself as a viable third party within the federal entity. These pro-Southern Congressmen would then push through State Rights legislation at the federal level. This would have the effect of “devolving” power to the states, and thus to the Dixian cause. At this point the final step would be taken: an open move towards political independence. A “Yes Dixie” campaign would begin in the Southern States. Its aim would be to establish a provisional Southern government by means of state plebiscites. On a given day of a given year, each Southern state would hold a yes-or-no plebiscite proposing that state’s participation in a national confederation of Southern states. Assuming success in this effort, a new Confederate Congress would then be formed and seated. Its first order of business would be the submission to the member states of an act of secession from the federal Union and a declaration of independence from same. Of course, this is an idealized plan. No one with eyes to see and ears to hear believes that the Federal Entity is going to sit back and watch as the South rises again. To be a “neo-Confederate” is already to be under suspicion by the Federal Entity and its various private watchdog groups. Should any serious Southern nationalist movement arise, the Disingenuous White Liberal propaganda machine will go to full throttle, promoting Dixie nationalism from the status of mere fringe kookery to full-blown terrorism. Black-Run America is no more likely to let us walk away from their “indissoluble Union” than the Communist Party was to let Ukraine and Belarus walk away from their “unbreakable Union”. But the power of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union was not without limit. Once the inescapable collapse of the Soviet economic and political regime reduced the power of the Kremlin below the level necessary to keep the USSR together by force, Ukraine, Belarus, and the Warsaw Pact nations

131

simply presented their independence to Moscow as a fait accompli. The ability of the DWL power structure and its minority clients to dominate the United States is similarly limited. Once the inescapable collapse of the American economic and political regime reduces the power of BRA to the point where it can no longer hold the federal union together by force, the Confederate States of America, or as an ally of, along with the Republic of Texas, the Kingdom of Hawai’i, and the rest — will simply walk away. Until that day, our job as White Americans is to survive, to build our identity and our strength, and to establish provisional political and economic structures to be activated as BRA’s grip upon our throats is lost. Like the Scots, we must create a vigorous and broadly-based political movement upon which to base these structures. To this end, I recommend the establishment of political working groups among the various White nationalist organizations in the USA. For example, a working group comprised of delegates from all the leading state rights, pro-Southern, and neo-Confederate organizations might be formed. Its purpose: to establish the Dixie National Party, and to enable a Yes Dixie campaign for the promotion of Southern national identity and solidarity. Its first goal: to get a million Southerners to sign the Dixie Declaration: I believe it is fundamentally better for us all, if decisions about Dixie’s future are taken by the people who care most about Dixie, that is, by the people of Dixie. Being independent means Dixie’s future will be in the hands of the people of the South. There is no doubt that Dixie has great potential. We are blessed with talent, resources and creativity. We have the opportunity to make our nation a better place to live, for this and future generations. We can build a more free and more prosperous society, a society that reflects our culture and our

132

ways, a society that is a stronger and more successful advocate of our interests than it is today. I want a Southland that speaks with her own voice and makes her own unique contribution to the world: a Southland that stands alongside the other nations on this continent, as an independent nation. I myself am a supporter of the Texas nationalist cause. I believe that Texans constitute a true nation, one which deserves to be embodied as an independent state. But Texas was once part of the Confederacy, and I also believe that the fortunes of the Lone Star State are tied to those of her former Confederate fellows. Texans and the people of Dixie must make common cause of we are to break free of the cold grip of godless tyranny. And we can. All over the world, nationalist groups are struggling to free themselves from the rule of people who live far away from them and who share a different culture from their own. The Ukrainians and the Belarusians did it. The Scots came close to doing it. The Catalans and the Basques are doing it. And we can do it, too. But what would a new Confederacy be like? In simple terms, it would be something like the America that existed prior to the Civil War: a confederation of sovereign states, united by a confederal government limited to those powers necessary to provide for the common defense, and dedicated to the securing of the blessings of freedom to its founders (White people) and their posterity (the White nation in the South). The new CSA would be the Anti-BRA, a liberated zone where the White population would be free from the racial tyranny of the post-1964 DWL regime. Social critic Hunter Wallace gives us a likely view of the results: the new Confederacy would likely move immediately to “gut the welfare state” and devolve power “to the states and local government, then stand by” while the people sorted out the details for themselves. Wallace imagines blacks in the liberated states asking “‘What do you

133

mean my Section 8 is denied? What do you mean you no longer accept SNAP EBT? What do you mean my TANF welfare check isn’t coming in the mail? What do you mean there is no Medicaid anymore? What do you mean the White people don’t have to pay for my child’s education and free lunch anymore?’” He replies,hypothetically: “‘I mean that there is a Freedom Ride gassed up and ready to go at the Greyhound bus station in Montgomery that will take you on a one way trip to Vermont and Massachusetts where the world still revolves around you. Please go there and escape from our white privilege and structural racism’”[61]. Amusing speculations aside, the new Confederate States of America would likely move to strip away the layers of antiWhite legislation that have accumulated over the past fifty years: It would immediately restore freedom of association on private property (public property would likely remain integrated, for reasons we have treated of above). The individual states would likely act as well, moving to end public schooling and zero out financial aid programs, end all entitlement programs, end all affirmative action programs, and repeal all so-called hate crime laws. In the new Confederacy, the various federal “civil rights” bureaucracies would vanish like flatulence in a hurricane. State legislatures might act to reinstall poll taxes and voter certification procedures, legalize the concealed or open carrying of firearms, and ruthlessly put down riots and public disorder of any sort. But what about blacks in this new CSA? Would a new Confederacy be an apartheid state, a sort of Jim Crow paradise with computers and cell phones? It need not be. It could instead be a sort of “Israel of the West”. The current State of Israel is, in many ways, a model ethnostate. While it is inhabited by people of many ethnicities and faiths, the State of Israel exists in order to advance the interests of its own people (Israeli Jews) over those of other

134

races. As a de facto White ethnostate, the new CSA would likewise be constitutionally obligated to advance the needs of Whites over those of other races. This would require the effective disenfranchisement of the black population of the Confederacy. This disenfranchisement need not be done by legislative fiat; instead, it might better be done primarily through weighing the vote according to the amount of taxes paid. The resumption of traditional American practice of limiting the franchise to property owners would effectively disenfranchise the great majority of Negroes without the need for any overt discrimination. As a traditionalist society, the new Confederacy might also very likely encourage women to return to traditional roles of wife, home-maker and mother, this reducing the impact of the female vote of national politics. Eventually, however, the people of the new Confederacy would have to determine some charitable and permanent means of separating the Negro population from the White population of the new nation. (As a Christian state, the CSA could of course have no truck with any sort of violent or inhuman â&#x20AC;&#x153;ethnic cleansingâ&#x20AC;?.) Instead, the primary means of reducing the Negro population would be through elimination of the welfare state and a system of private discrimination. Additionally, the ending of government favoritism toward black-owned businesses would impact the Negro the middle class, thereby also reducing political influence. Taken together, these changes will likely push the Negro population of the new CSA to self-deport, thus ending the threat of racial conflict in the South [62]. It is important, too, to distinguish between urban blacks in the South and rural blacks. While the Negro populations of Atlanta, Memphis, and other large Southern cities would be incompatible with a reborn Confederacy, the Negro populations of the Mississippi Delta and other rural regions would be

135

much less so. From dialect to soul food, Whites in the South have much more in common with rural Southern Negroes than they do with Whites from outside of Dixie, and there has never been much in the way of hatred between the two groups of Southrons. There is every possibility that a reborn Dixie might find a way to accommodate rural Southern Negroes, perhaps as an independent political entity within, or associated with, the Confederacy. The independent and sovereign Negro “State of Delta” might very easily take its place alongside Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana in the ranks of — or as an ally of — a revived Confederate States of America. The establishment of a new Confederacy and other political entities based upon genuine nations is the only true solution to the problem of race in America. The destruction of Black-Run America will be the first victory in the larger war against the Revolution. The revival of a White, Christian ethnostate in North America will free all Americans from the tyranny of enforced diversity and the tyranny that accompanies multiculturalism. At last, Whites and members of other races will be free to realize their ultimate destinies upon this continent. V. SWITZAMERICA The defeat of BRA and the establishment of a White ethnostate in North America will not be the end of our struggle. It will be the beginning of a new quest: to create a continental society where all races, religions, and ethnic groups will have their own national homelands. Above all, it will be a return to organic social and political order, and order centered upon the basic unit of society, the natural human family. One’s family is one’s nation in the most basic sense. Loyalty to that nation is next to loyalty to God, which is of course the most important loyalty any person can have. Without healthy families no larger-scale healthy social

136

order can exist. Our first course of action will be, therefore, to construct a political system dedicated to the protection and nurture of the traditional social order as it existed prior to the Revolution. We must resolve to create a state that will rebuild and strengthen the natural human family. We must also resolve to shrug off the chains of narcissism and atomistic individualism imposed upon us by the Revolution and step forth into the freedom of the divinelyordained traditions of our people. In practical terms, we as a nation must return to the idea of sacramental marriage. Divorce, especially with remarriage, must be re-hung with the stigma it once wore. And it goes without saying that any traditional political and social order we create must value and protect innocent human life. Contraception and abortion are the greatest moral scourge of our age, and together have done more to contribute to the genocide of the White race than has any of BRA’s schemes. As the protector of the White race, the new White state can therefore only oppose artificial contraception and forbid abortion. Dead White babies = no White future. The establishment of a new White nation also necessarily entails an end to feminism and a return to traditional sexual roles and relationships. But what of the poor in the new White Ethnostate? The new White state must lend its support to the only form of “welfare” that works: the charity that can only be enacted by the extended family. In the new state, Whites will be encouraged to live as near to and as closely with their ”folks” as possible. By encouraging families to live in community, the new state will rebuild the fundament of the White race. But the most important thing the new White state will do is... absolutely nothing. The new Confederacy must have a confederal government that is strictly limited in its powers and responsibilities to those which of necessity belong to government. In keeping with the traditional Western ideal of subsidiarity, all powers and responsibilities in the new White

137

ethnostate will be devolved to the smallest possible level: the States, the cities, the communities and neighborhoods. All things done well, the national government will have essentially no presence in the day-to-day lives of the average citizen. You remember: the way it was before, when America was free. Race relations in the new White country will be governed by the principle of free association upon private property. The first thing the new ethnostate must do is to restore neighborhoods. We will get rid of all “civil rights” laws pertaining to private property; this will end blockbusting, federally-subsidized housing, etc., and restore to property owners the freedom to dispose of their own property as they see fit. This restoration of freedom of association will instantly solve almost all of the problems associated with diversity. Absent the federal integration bayonet, Whites (and everyone else) will once again enjoy the liberty to exclude anyone from their private property for any reason or none. A segregated society will then emerge naturally, without the need for Jim Crow laws. Negroes want to live with Negroes, after all, and Whites with Whites, and Koreans with Koreans. Once free association on private property is restored, ethnic neighborhoods will revive and begin to flourish again. And, once ethnic neighborhoods are re-established, most racial problems will simply go away. The new Confederacy will be a free country. In a free country, the citizen’s freedom of association and personal property rights must be enforceable, either by law or by the law of the gun. This will be the role of the new state: to protect the right of free men to say “Nigger (or Cracker, or Chinaman, or Spic, or Mallate, or sei gwei lo, or Gringo), stay the hell off my property!”, and to make it stick. Then, with freedom restored, we can seek larger horizons. What of the rest of America, the America beyond the new Confederacy? Come the restoration, BRA will be dead, but (God willing) most Americans will still be alive. Might not

138

other North Americans look to the Dixie example and create their own ethnic and racial nation states? I believe they will. Imagine a post-BRA city: after BRA, the unified, top-down, imposed social structure known as “city governments” will likely be gone. The opportunity to reorganize our cities along organic lines will then exist. How might this be accomplished? Here is one way: Imagine the City of XYZ, a city where BRA no longer has the power to protect any given racial or ethnic group from any other. Left without Big Brother and his gun boys, the city’s racial and ethnic populations will no longer have the power to “bust” White neighborhoods. As a result, natural ethnic neighborhoods will re-emerge. The leaders of each neighborhoods might then meet at old city hall, agree on “hard” neighborhood borders, and form a confederation. Instead of the City of XYZ, the new “city government” might be called “The United Neighborhoods of XYZ”. Under the terms of the confederation, each neighborhood would retain its sovereignty, the right to bar outsiders, to make its own laws, etc. Each would also chip in a bit of cash and/or manpower in order to pay for and maintain the city’s infrastructure (roads, sewers, drainage, power, etc.) After all, until technology improves to the point where neighborhood-level power generation, waste treatment, etc. become practical, such infrastructure will be necessary. By joining forces only as necessary, the neighborhoods can maintain their independence while at the same time making sure the toilets keep flushing the right way. Any neighborhood that can’t or won’t pony up gets cut off. The United Neighborhoods will keep the roads open around and through and deadbeat neighborhood, but that’s all. In such a system, I’d expect that major arterial streets and roads would become “city property”, open to all regardless of race; people have to get around, after all. But these zones of

139

openness would only be as wide as the curbs or the rights of way; a black man would be able to pass through Honky Heights freely as long as he kept to the street. Any attempt by him to leave the street would constitute a violation of the treaty, an invasion of Honky Heights, and would render him subject to the laws of that neighborhood. Ditto Whitey: he could pass through Soul City, but he couldn’t hang around without permission from the locals. Some neighborhoods might choose to remain multiracial and multi-ethnic. I can’t imagine there’d be more than a few of these, but the point is that the choice would be there. No one would be forced to enjoy “enrichment”, “vibrancy”, or people who “look like America”. Neighborhoods might also form on the basis of religion, sexual perversion, or other criteria. A given city-confederation might have Homo Town right next to Vatican Acres, First Baptist Neighborhood, and of course Methodopolis. (The one group that would be forbidden would be Muslims. They simply can’t coexist in peace with others.) Once we have replaced “proposition cities” with cityconfederations, we might then reorganize county governments. We might do this by eliminating county governments and services and replacing them with a single county judge (elected by the neighborhoods, not by the people) and a county sheriff. The judge decides the law within the county; the sheriff enforces it. At this point we can contemplate regional politics. With state governments gone, broke, and/or powerless, coalitions of counties could be formed. These coalitions might be formed on the basis of race, language, or religion. Let us call these coalitions “cantons”. Eight adjacent White counties in North Texas, for example, might join forces to form Trinity Canton. Each canton would be governed by a council composed of the county judges from each member county — or by a king, or a dictator, or by whatever method the folks in that area might prefer — and this cantonal government would

140

have jurisdiction only over matters that affect all member counties. The various cantons might then join together with other, similar cantons across the country in order to form the new ethnostates. The White cantons in other parts of North America might, for example, join together to form the American Republic, a White ethnostate which might be either independent of or allied with the new Confederate States of America. The various black-dominated cantons could unite to form the Republic of New Africa. The Spanish-speaking Southwest might be formally constituted as La República del Aztlan; Francophone Canada would at last be realized as la République du Québec. And from the corpse of the old Black-Run America, a new federation might sprout, a federation of independent ethnostates, each formed from cantons, each canton itself a federation of counties, each county based around a city that is itself a federation of free neighborhoods. These ethnorepublics would be sovereign states, each with its own laws, its own passports, its own military forces, and even à la mode israélienne its own independent nuclear deterrent, just to keep everyone honest. They could negotiate with each other over territory, trade, access to rivers and ports, etc., or they could fight it out (although the independent nuclear deterrent held by each nation would likely make war too expensive as a means of settling disputes). In any case: by building up from the bottom instead of imposing a top-down social order, we might maximize the enjoyment of the freedoms of association and property by families while minimizing government at every level. After all, in a real nation, families, churches, and neighborhoods do most of the governing, regulating, welfare-check writing, educating, and defending. The counties, cantons, and other new ethnostates would have very little to do with the day-today lives of families and individuals. No one would be forced to “tolerate” anyone they didn’t want to. Crime would drop

141

to near-zero levels thanks to segregation and local policing. Democracy would be minimized. Taxes, if any, would be locally imposed and collected. This would be a free country again. And thus we come to the vision of our ultimate goal: a kind of SwitzAmerica, a new America composed of mono-ethnic and mono-racial nation-states, each one separate and sovereign, each in free association with one another, each with the power to live, prosper, and realize its own destiny. Of course, there will be plenty of problems in such a world. No social order is or can be perfect — and, as history has shown, any attempt to erect a “perfect” social order will sooner or later end in tyranny. Utopia means “no place on Earth”. But by deconstructing the current propositional/ideological social and political order and allowing the natural order to reemerge, I think we will come closer to the vision of a truly free, truly humane society, a society organized not on the basis of some abstract ideology or principle but in accordance with human nature as it is. VI. IF WE DO NOTHING When the thirteen American colonies broke away from the British Empire, the new country’s founding fathers and other independence-minded folks around at the time decided they wanted nothing more to do with old Europe and the old idea of blood-and-soil nationality. And so they created America as a so-called “proposition nation” — that is, as a political entity tied together by a proposition (the U.S. Constitution) instead of by shared ancestry, language, and culture. This worked out in the beginning because America was a true nation — a social order based upon shared ancestry (European), language (English) and culture (Christian). Yes, the new U.S.A. was de jure a proposition nation, but it was very much a white country de facto.

142

But de facto White America didn’t last. The Revolution was at work even then. Less than one hundred years after its founding, the original America was destroyed in the so-called Civil War. The rapid social, cultural, and economic changes that occurred during the years between Appomattox and Pearl Harbor were the beginning of the end of White America. World War II came, and with it came a new racial and social order. The war’s federally-funded boom economy brought federally-forced racial integration to the workplace; the rise of the so-called civil rights movement of the post-war period finished the job of eliminating the European consciousness of Whites in America. Jim Crow was cast down by federal decree. Blacks flooded into the low-rent ethnic inner cities, sparking huge race riots, beginning the process of urban decay, and sending the more-prosperous white residents of these cities to the suburbs in droves. Fueled by cheap gas and rising on the new federal highways, these ethnically-cleansed Whites created the phenomenon of White Flight — and Suburbia as we know it today. The aggressive sameness and isolated single-family architecture of Suburbia destroyed European ethnic identity in America once and for all. And then came Brown v. Board of Education, the Freedom Riders, the March of Washington, the martyrdom of Dr. King, the Civil Rights Act, and at last the end. The Federal Entity ceased being the defender of the interests of White people and arrayed its might behind the cause of the Negro. White people became the “outsiders”, the enemies of Dr. King’s Dream. Black-Run America was born. As a result of all this, White Americans today do not identify themselves as a people. We have been melded into a more or less deracinated conglomeration of colorless “American” nonbeings. We Whites have hitched our identity (“Americans”) to a falling star (the United States of America), a “nation” that once happened to be a White nation but is now run by Disingenuous White Liberals for the benefit of blacks and other nonwhites.

143

And it had to happen. The U.S.A. is not and has never been a “nation”. It is a state based upon a proposition — an ideological program written in our case upon a piece of parchment. That parchment, the United States Constitution, is what defines America qua America. But, as we have seen, a nation defined by a proposition is a castle built upon sand. A proposition is a pile of words, after all, and words can be edited, interpreted, and amended to suit the whims of the hand holding the biggest rock. A real nation, on the other hand, grows up from rock. It is not based upon words, but upon concrete realities: blood, religion, culture, language, place. A real nation can’t be edited, interpreted, or amended. It can only be erased. As we Whites are being erased. Like any sand castle, the present propositional American state, which we call Black-Run America, is a temporary affair. The tides of time will wash it away sooner or later. And assuming any of us live to see that day, we’ll have to decide what sort of edifice will replace it. When that day comes, let’s not make the mistake of propositionalism. If we insist on replacing BRA with another proposition state of any type, we’re dooming ourselves to a repeat of history. Instead, let us should seek to recreate a world where politics grow from the bottom up. Let us pledge our allegiance to something real. Let us redirect our loyalties away from ideological, propositional “nations” and towards that nested series of loyalties rooted in human nature and the natural law. We must start at the bottom. We are all individual human beings. Each of us is in some sense an independent state, a nation of one. But, as we have seen, the basic unit of society — the core “nation” — is not the individual. That is the Enlightenment’s chief lie, and the same lie the Serpent used to get us into this mess. As we have said, the basic unit of any organic society is and must be the natural human family. And that’s what race is, in the end: fathers, mothers, and

144

children, a line of families echoing down through the ages, the family writ large. Love of race is love of family. For the past fifty years or so the fight against racism has been the centerpiece of Black-Run America. Yet it is not a war against racial hatreds. Indeed, far more racial hatred has been stirred up in the name of equality than has been eliminated by it. It is a war not only against White People, but against all races, against the very idea of distinctions between people. It is a war against the family — against clans, tribes, ethnic groups, nationalities, religions — against any group or entity that might threaten the allegiance of the new Universal Man to the Universal State. In order to create this liberal Utopia, the Revolution must destroy the races of man. The very idea of race must be eliminated. The new Revolutionary Man can be permitted no race but the human race, no loyalty but loyalty to his or her own nerve endings and to the global Revolutionary State. “The players in the conflict care very little for either [race],” writes Daniel Greenfield. “They are not completely inhuman, but they are playing for different stakes, and both believe in a Post-American order with no borders and no national identities. The only question is how this Utopia will be run and on what principles. But they both agree that it can only be properly created by destroying the nation in the name of some post-national virtue, whether it’s social justice or free enterprise” [63]. Open your eyes and See! This is why there is a War on White People: the Revolution can’t create its godless, colorless Utopia until they get rid of God and God’s natural human family. They can’t get rid of the family until they get rid of race. And they can’t get rid of race until they get rid of White people, until they exterminate us. That is what you must See. But if you are going to open your eyes and See, do it now. We have little time left here in America to waste on the Dream.

145

Ever since the government decided to force racial integration on the American people at bayonet point, race relations in America have gotten worse and worse. Don’t imagine that life will be easy once you can See. Learning to See is going to cost you. Once you start to See, and share what you See with others, you will find out what it really means to be a member of a minority in America. You are going to lose your Internet friends. You may lose all of your friends. You may indeed lose everything: the love of your family; your spouse; your job. The instant you begin to speak openly of your love of White people, the instant you stand up and denounce Black-Run America for the genocide machine that it is... then you a raciss. But — since you a raciss no matter what — then I say you should embrace it. The fear of being thought a racist is for many white folks the ultimate fear. And for good reason: in Black-Run America, being a raciss is worse than being a child molester. It’s like being a communist during the Red Scare of the 1950s. One misplaced word, one carelessly-told joke, one eye-roll at the news of the latest “injustice”, one hint that the latest outbreak of TNB isn’t 100% justified in the light of the Legacy of Slavery, and you’re on the blacklist. It doesn’t matter how good your debating technique is. It doesn’t matter how much data you have to support your positions. Once you a raciss, you will never be able to defend yourself. Once you a raciss, the debate is over. But this isn’t debate any more. This is war – the War on White people. And in war, the best defense is a good offense. It therefore follows that the best way to defeat the enemy is to retreat – right through his front lines. In other words: don’t defend yourself. Attack. Right now, you a raciss is the whip that the DWLs use to make you their slave. Well, slave, it’s time to revolt. Don’t lie there and let Massa beat you with that whip! Turn on him! Stand up, grab the whip on its way down, accept the damage

146

to your hand with a grin, yank Massa toward you and tell him “Okay, I a raciss. That word no longer has any power to harm me.” The next time someone says you a raciss, don’t object. Cooly look them in the eye and say “Yep. So what?” So what indeed. At that point you have called their bluff. Calling you a raciss is the DWL’s ace in the hole. It is the worst thing he or she can do to you. But once they’ve played it, once they’ve done their worst, once they’ve unleashed the ultimate weapon on you, they can’t hurt you anymore. So stop retreating. Stop defending yourself. Advance! Call their bluff. Once you break free of the fear of you a raciss, the DWLs and their puppets have no more power over you. You have charged through their front line. They have nothing left. You win. No, Rodney King, we can’t “all just get along”. Black violence against Whites is creating a backlash among even liberal Whites. Sure, it’s all just grumbling on the Internet today — but what will things be like in ten years if the current situation is allowed to continue? Blacks are after all only a small percentage of the American population. They’re protected from the consequences of their bad behavior by Black-Run America and the propaganda industry today, but sooner or later, the frequency and severity of black violence against Whites and others will reach a level that even BRA and its propaganda machine can’t hide. When Quantravius and Shaqueesha are smashing your front windows or beating your kid with a tire iron it doesn’t matter what the blonde DWL idiot on CNN says. And the day that White America finally admits to itself what anyone can clearly See, the Race War is on. Race War is the most horrible kind of war that exists. It is a brutal, atavistic orgy of carnage, rape, and looting, with genocide its goal. In a Race War, your skin is your uniform, and its color determines who is Friend and who is Enemy. And

147

once things reach the point of no return, once the danger from black violence reaches the point where Whites and members other ethnic groups feel that they have nothing to lose by fighting back against black violence, we will have a Race War – and God help us all then. “If there is anything worse than a one-sided race war,” writes Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Dr. Thomas Sowell, “It is a two-sided race war, especially when one of the races outnumbers the other several times over… Trying to keep the lid on is understandable. But a lot of pressure can build up under that lid. If and when that pressure leads to an explosion of white backlash, things could be a lot worse than if the truth had come out earlier” [64]. Wise words. Race war would be a slaughter. We must not allow such a war to occur. Right now, only naked force wielded by BRA and the DWLs that control it have kept the lid on racial violence in America. But at some point black misbehavior will become so widespread, so severe, that White America will shrug off the shackles of inaction welded upon their hands BRA and the propaganda mills and once again draw the sword. At that point, Whites will impose their own solution to the problems caused by blacks. Any such solution is likely to be final. CONCLUSION: THE DREAM IS OVER The late Rev. Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. had a dream: a world where men would be judged by content of character rather than by color of skin. It was, perhaps, a noble dream. Certainly it inspired the world. And, for a few lovely months back during those days of hope and change, it even seemed like a dream that could come true. But it didn’t. And it won’t.

148

The Dream is over. Blacks and others cannot live together in peace. This is a fact, proven over and over again by the realities of everyday life in America for the last fifty years. If we are to live in peace we must live separately. We must restore to Americans their traditional right of free association on private property. We must resurrect the ethnic and racial communities that existed prior to the age of the Dream. We must re-segregate our society on a de jure basis. We must create a constitutional White ethnostate in North America – not only for the safety, prosperity, and well-being of White people, but for the survival of all. The alternative is unthinkable. If we don’t wake up from the Dream, if we refuse to See reality, the result will be horrific: more forced integration, more diversity at bayonet point, more hatred and chaos between the races, and sooner or later — God forbid! — open race war. We are not all the same under our skins. Differences between members of the various races are a fact, just as differences between individuals are a fact. Some of these differences are genetic in origin. Others are the result of the operation of culture upon genetics. And still others among these differences are cultural alone. Whatever their origins, these differences are real, and their consequences are real. Moral people of all races must recognize these differences and act now to separate the races – before they are separated by war. The nightmare of a race war is the inevitable end of the Dream. For the sake of our children — and of all children, of every race and color — we must not permit this nightmare to become real. The Dream is over. White people, it is time and past time to wake up from the nightmare of life in Black-Run America. It is time to open your eyes. It is time to See. END

149

AFTERWORD This is a book of love: love of White people. Loving White people is the most important thing you can do destroy the power of the Disingenuous White Liberals and defeat Black Run America and the Global Luciferian Revolution that empowers it. I don’t claim to have all the answers, nor do I expect you to agree with everything I have written in this book. But I do know this: unless we White people start loving ourselves, unless we learn to love ourselves as White people, we are doomed. Nothing in this book should be construed as a call for hatred, violence, or terrorism, and I categorically repudiate any person or group of persons who cites or otherwise uses this text as an incitement, justification, or call for hatred, violence, or terrorism. Only love can save us: we must love God, and love our neighbors as ourselves. But we cannot love our neighbors as ourselves until we love ourselves. These are the stakes: we White people must love ourselves, or we must die. — RSO3

150

Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret. (You may drive out Nature with a pitchfork, yet she still will hurry back.) â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Horace, Epistles I, x, 24 [20 B.C.]

151

APPENDICES Governor George C. Wallace Inaugural Address to the Citizens of Alabama 14 Junuary 1963 Today I have stood, where once Jefferson Davis stood, and took an oath to my people. It is very appropriate then that from this Cradle of the Confederacy, this very Heart of the Great Anglo-Saxon Southland, that today we sound the drum for freedom as have our generations of forebears before us done, time and time again through history. Let us rise to the call of freedom-loving blood that is in us and send our answer to the tyranny that clanks its chains upon the South. In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say: segregation today; segregation tomorrow; segregation forever. The Washington, D.C. school riot report is disgusting and revealing. We will not sacrifice our children to any such type school system--and you can write that down. The federal troops in Mississippi could be better used guarding the safety of the citizens of Washington, D.C., where it is even unsafe to walk or go to a ballgame--and that is the nationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s capital. I was safer in a B-29 bomber over Japan during the war in an air raid, than the people of Washington are walking to the White House neighborhood. A closer example is Atlanta. The city officials fawn for political reasons over school integration and then build barricades to stop residential integration. What hypocrisy! Let us send this message back to Washington by our representatives who are with us today: that from this day we are standing up, and the heel of tyranny does not fit the neck of an upright man; that we intend to take the offensive and carry our fight for freedom across the nation, wielding the balance of power we know we possess in the Southland; that we, not the

152

insipid bloc of voters of some sections, will determine in the next election who shall sit in the White House of these United States; that from this day, from this hour, from this minute, we give the word of a race of honor that we will tolerate their boot in our face no longer. And let those certain judges put that in their opium pipes of power and smoke it for what it is worth. Hear me, Southerners! You sons and daughters who have moved north and west throughout this nation, we call on you from your native soil to join with us in national support and vote, and we know, wherever you are, away from the hearths of the Southland, that you will respond, for though you may live in the farthest reaches of this vast country, your heart has never left Dixieland. And you native sons and daughters of old New England’s rock-ribbed patriotism, and you sturdy natives of the great Mid-West, and you descendants of the far West flaming spirit of pioneer freedom: we invite you to come and be with us — for you are of the Southern spirit, and the Southern philosophy. You are Southerners, too, and brothers with us in our fight. What I have said about segregation goes double this day — and what I have said to or about some federal judges goes triple this day. Alabama has been blessed by God as few states in this Union have been blessed. Our state owns ten percent of all the natural resources of all the states in our country. Our inland waterway system is second to none, and has the potential of being the greatest waterway transport system in the entire world. We possess over thirty minerals in usable quantities and our soil is rich and varied, suited to a wide variety of plants. Our native pine and forestry system produces timber faster than we can cut it and yet we have only pricked the surface of the great lumber and pulp potential. With ample rainfall and rich grasslands our livestock industry is in the infancy of a giant future that can make us a center of the big and growing meat packing and prepared foods

153

marketing. We have the favorable climate, streams, woodlands, beaches, and natural beauty to make us a recreational mecca in the booming tourist and vacation industry. Nestled in the great Tennessee Valley, we possess the rocket center of the world and the keys to the space frontier. While the trade with a developing Europe built the great port cities of the east coast, our own fast developing port of Mobile faces as a magnetic gateway to the great continent of South America, well over twice as large and hundreds of times richer in resources, even now awakening to the growing probes of enterprising capital with a potential of growth and wealth beyond any present dream for our port development and corresponding results throughout the connecting waterways that thread our state. And while the manufacturing industries of free enterprise have been coming to our state in increasing numbers, attracted by our bountiful natural resources, our growing numbers of skilled workers and our favorable conditions, their present rate of settlement here can be increased from the trickle they now represent to a stream of enterprise and endeavor, capital and expansion that can join us in our work of development and enrichment of the educational futures of our children, the opportunities of our citizens and the fulfillment of our talents as God has given them to us. To realize our ambitions and to bring to fruition our dreams, we as Alabamians must take cognizance of the world about us. We must re-define our heritage, re-school our thoughts in the lessons our forefathers knew so well, first hand, in order to function and to grow and to prosper. We can no longer hide our head in the sand and tell ourselves that the ideology of our free fathers is not being attacked and is not being threatened by another idea â&#x20AC;&#x201D; for it is. We are faced with an idea that if a centralized government assume enough authority, enough power over its people, that it can provide a utopian life, that if given the power to dictate, to forbid, to require, to demand, to distribute, to edict and to judge what is best and enforce that

154

will produce only “good” — and it shall be our father — and our God. It is an idea of government that encourages our fears and destroys our faith, for where there is faith, there is no fear, and where there is fear, there is no faith. In encouraging our fears of economic insecurity it demands we place that economic management and control with government; in encouraging our fear of educational development it demands we place that education and the minds of our children under management and control of government, and even in feeding our fears of physical infirmities and declining years, it offers and demands to father us through it all and even into the grave. It is a government that claims to us that it is bountiful as it buys its power from us with the fruits of its rapaciousness of the wealth that free men before it have produced and builds on crumbling credit without responsibilities to the debtors: our children. It is an ideology of government erected on the encouragement of fear and fails to recognize the basic law of our fathers that governments do not produce wealth, people produce wealth. Free people — and those people become less free as they learn there is little reward for ambition; that it requires faith to risk, and they have none; as the government must restrict and penalize and tax incentive and endeavor and must increase its expenditures of bounties; then this government must assume more and more police powers. And we find we are become government-fearing people, not God-fearing people. We find we have replaced faith with fear, and though we may give lip service to the Almighty, in reality, government has become our god. It is, therefore, a basically ungodly government and its appeal to the pseudo-intellectual and the politician is to change their status from servant of the people to master of the people, to play at being God, without faith in God, and without the wisdom of God. It is a system that is the very opposite of Christ for it feeds and encourages everything degenerate and base in our people as it assumes the responsibilities that we

155

ourselves should assume. Its pseudo-liberal spokesmen and some Harvard advocates have never examined the logic of its substitution of what it calls “human rights” for individual rights, for its propaganda play on words has appeal for the unthinking. Its logic is totally material and irresponsible as it runs the full gamut of human desires, including the theory that everyone has voting rights without the spiritual responsibility of preserving freedom. Our founding fathers recognized those rights — but only within the framework of those spiritual responsibilities. But the strong, simple faith and sane reasoning of our founding fathers has long since been forgotten as the so-called “progressives” tell us that our Constitution was written for “horse and buggy” days. So were the Ten Commandments. Not so long ago men stood in marvel and awe at the cities, the buildings, the schools, the autobahns that the government of Hitler’s Germany had built, just as centuries before they stood in wonder of Rome’s building. But it could not stand, for the system that built it had rotted the souls of the builders — and in turn, rotted the foundation of what God meant that men should be. Today that same system on an international scale is sweeping the world. It is the “changing world” of which we are told; it is called “new” and “liberal”. It is as old as the oldest dictator. It is degenerate and decadent. As the national racism of Hitler’s Germany persecuted a national minority to the whim of a national majority, so the international racism of the liberals seek to persecute the international white minority to the whim of the international colored majority, so that we are footballed about according to the favor of the Afro-Asian bloc. But the Belgian survivors of the Congo cannot present their case to a war crimes commission, nor the Portuguese of Angola, nor the survivors of Castro, nor the citizens of Oxford, Mississippi. It is this theory of international power politic that led a group

156

of men on the Supreme Court for the first time in American history to issue an edict, based not on legal precedent, but upon a volume, the editor of which said our Constitution is outdated and must be changed and the writers of which, some had admittedly belonged to as many as half a hundred communistfront organizations. It is this theory that led this same group of men to briefly bare the ungodly core of that philosophy in forbidding little school children to say a prayer. And we find the evidence of that ungodliness even in the removal of the words “in God we trust” from some of our dollars, which was placed there as like evidence by our founding fathers as the faith upon which this system of government was built. It is the spirit of power thirst that caused a President in Washington to take up Caesar’s pen and with one stroke of it make a law — a law which the lawmaking body of Congress refused to pass, a law that tells us that we can or cannot buy or sell our very homes, except by his conditions, and except at his discretion. It is the spirit of power-thirst that led the same President to launch a full offensive of twenty-five thousand troops against a university of all places, in his own country, and against his own people, when this nation maintains only six thousand troops in the beleaguered city of Berlin. We have witnessed such acts of “might makes right” over the world as men yielded to the temptation to play God, but we have never before witnessed it in America. We reject such acts as free men. We do not defy, for there is nothing to defy, since as free men we do not recognize any government right to give freedom or deny freedom. No government erected by man has that right. As Thomas Jefferson said, “The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time; no King holds the right of liberty in his hands.” Nor does any ruler in American government. We intend, quite simply, to practice the free heritage as bequeathed to us as sons of free fathers. We intend to revitalize the truly new and progressive form of government that is less that two hundred years old, a government first

157

founded in this nation simply and purely on faith, that there is a personal God who rewards good and punishes evil, that hard work will receive its just deserts, that ambition and ingenuity and inventiveness, and profit of such; are admirable traits and goals; that the individual is encouraged in his spiritual growth and from that growth arrives at a character that enhances his charity toward others and from that character and that charity so is influenced business, and labor and farmer and government. We intend to renew our faith as God-fearing men, not government-fearing men, nor any other kind of fearingmen. We intend to roll up our sleeves and pitch in to develop this full bounty God has given us, to live full and useful lives and in absolute freedom from all fear. Then can we enjoy the full richness of the Great American Dream. We have placed this sign, â&#x20AC;&#x153;In God We Trust,â&#x20AC;? upon our State Capitol on this Inauguration Day as physical evidence of determination to renew the faith of our fathers and to practice the free heritage they bequeathed to us. We do this with the clear and solemn knowledge that such physical evidence is evidently a direct violation of the logic of that Supreme Court in Washington D.C., and if they or their spokesmen in this state wish to term this defiance, I say, then let them make the most of it. This nation was never meant to be a unit of one, but a united of the many. That is the exact reason our freedom loving forefathers established the states, so as to divide the rights and powers among the states, insuring that no central power could gain master government control. In united effort we were meant to live under this government, whether Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Church of Christ, or whatever oneâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s denomination or religious belief, each respecting the others right to a separate denomination, each, by working to develop his own, enriching the total of all our lives through united effort. And so it was meant in our political lives, whether Republican, Democrat, Prohibition, or whatever political party, each striving from his separate political station,

158

respecting the rights of others to be separate and work from within their political framework, and each separate political station making its contribution to our lives, . And so it was meant in our racial lives, each race, within its own framework has the freedom to teach; to instruct; to develop; to ask for and receive deserved help from others of separate racial stations. This is the great freedom of our American founding fathers, but if we amalgamate into the one unit as advocated by the communist philosophers; then the enrichment of our lives, the freedom for our development, is gone forever. We become, therefore, a mongrel unit of one under a single all powerful government, and we stand for everything â&#x20AC;&#x201D; and for nothing. The true brotherhood of America, of respecting the separateness of others; and uniting in effort; has been so twisted and distorted from its original concept that there is a small wonder that communism is winning the world. We invite the Negro citizens of Alabama to work with us from his separate racial station; as we will work with him; to develop, to grow in individual freedom and enrichment. We want jobs and a good future for both races; the tubercular and the infirm. This is the basic heritage of my religion, if which I make full practice, for we are all the handiwork of God. But we warn those, of any group, who would follow the false doctrine of communistic amalgamation that we will not surrender our system of government, our freedom of race and religion, that freedom was won at a hard price and if it requires a hard price to retain it; we are able; and quite willing to pay it. The liberalsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; theory that poverty, discrimination and lack of opportunity is the cause of communism is a false theory, if it were true the South would have been the biggest single communist bloc in the western hemisphere long ago, for after the great War Between the States, our people faced a desolate land of burned universities, destroyed crops and homes, with manpower depleted and crippled, and even the mule, which was required to work the land, was so scarce that whole

159

communities shared one animal to make the spring plowing. There were no government handouts, no Marshall Plan aid, no coddling to make sure that our people would not suffer; instead the South was set upon by the vulturous carpetbagger and federal troops, all loyal Southerners were denied the vote at the point of bayonet, so that the infamous, illegal 14th Amendment might be passed. There was no money, no food and no hope of either. But our grandfathers bent their knee only in church and bowed their head only to God. Not for a single instant did they ever consider the easy way of federal dictatorship and amalgamation in return for fat bellies. They fought. They dug sweet roots from the ground with their bare hands and boiled them in iron pots, . they gathered poke salad from the woods and acorns from the ground. They fought. They followed no false doctrine, they knew what the wanted; and they fought for freedom! They came up from their knees in the greatest disply of sheer nerve, grit and guts that has ever been set down in the pages of written history, and they won! The great writer, Rudyard Kipling wrote of them, that: “There in the Southland of the United States of America, lives the greatest fighting breed of man, in all the world!” And that is why today, I stand ashamed of the fat, well-fed whimperers who say that it is inevitable, that our cause is lost. I am ashamed of them, and I am ashamed for them. They do not represent the people of the Southland. And may we take note of one other fact, with all trouble with communists that some sections of this country have, there are not enough native communists in the South to fill up a telephone booth, . and that is a matter of public FBI record. We remind all within hearing of this Southland that a Southerner, Peyton Randolph, presided over the Continental Congress in our nation’s beginning, that a Southerner, Thomas Jefferson, wrote the Declaration of Independence, that a Southerner, George Washington, is the Father of our country, that a Southerner, James Madison, authored our Constitution, that a Southerner, George Mason, authored the Bill of Rights

160

and it was a Southerner who said, “Give me liberty — or give me death,” Patrick Henry. Southerners played a most magnificent part in erecting this great divinely inspired system of freedom; and as God is our witnesses, Southerners will save it. Let us, as Alabamians, grasp the hand of destiny and walk out of the shadow of fear, and fill our divine destination. Let us not simply defend; but let us assume the leadership of the fight and carry our leadership across this nation. God has placed us here in this crisis, let is not fail in this; our most historical moment. You are here today, present in this audience, and to you over this great state, wherever you are in sound of my voice, I want to humbly and with all sincerity, thank you for your faith in me. I promise you that I will try to make you a good governor. I promise you that, as God gives me the wisdom and the strength, I will be sincere with you. I will be honest with you. I will apply the old sound rule of our fathers, that anything worthy of our defense is worthy of one hundred percent of our defense. I have been taught that freedom meant freedom from any threat or fear of government. I was born in that freedom, I was raised in that freedom, I intend to live, live in that freedom, and God willing, when I die, I shall leave that freedom to my children, as my father left it to me. My pledge to you, to “Stand up for Alabama,” is a stronger pledge today than it was the first day I made that pledge. I shall “Stand up for Alabama,” as Governor of our State, you stand with me, and we, together, can give courageous leadership to millions of people throughout this nation who look to the South for their hope in this fight to win and preserve our freedoms and liberties. So help me God. And my prayer is that the Father who reigns above us will bless all the people of this great sovereign State and nation, both white and black. I thank you.

161

Governor George C. Wallace “The Civil Rights Movement: Fraud, Sham, and Hoax” 4 July 1964 We come here today in deference to the memory of those stalwart patriots who on July 4, 1776, pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to establish and defend the proposition that governments are created by the people, empowered by the people, derive their just powers from the consent of the people, and must forever remain subservient to the will of the people. Today, 188 years later, we celebrate that occasion and find inspiration and determination and courage to preserve and protect the great principles of freedom enunciated in the Declaration of Independence. It is therefore a cruel irony that the President of the United States has only yesterday signed into law the most monstrous piece of legislation ever enacted by the United States Congress. It is a fraud, a sham, and a hoax. This bill will live in infamy. To sign it into law at any time is tragic. To do so upon the eve of the celebration of our independence insults the intelligence of the American people. It dishonors the memory of countless thousands of our dead who offered up their very lives in defense of principles which this bill destroys. Never before in the history of this nation have so many human and property rights been destroyed by a single enactment of the Congress. It is an act of tyranny. It is the assassin’s knife stuck in the back of liberty. With this assassin’s knife and a blackjack in the hand of the Federal force-cult, the left-wing liberals will try to force us back into bondage. Bondage to a tyranny more brutal than that imposed by the British monarchy which claimed power to rule over the lives of our forefathers under sanction of the Divine Right of kings. Today, this tyranny is imposed by the central government

162

which claims the right to rule over our lives under sanction of the omnipotent black-robed despots who sit on the bench of the United States Supreme Court. This bill is fraudulent in intent, in design, and in execution. It is misnamed. Each and every provision is mistitled. It was rammed through the congress on the wave of ballyhoo, promotions, and publicity stunts reminiscent of P. T. Barnum. It was enacted in an atmosphere of pressure, intimidation, and even cowardice, as demonstrated by the refusal of the United States Senate to adopt an amendment to submit the bill to a vote of the people. To illustrate the fraud: it is not a Civil Rights Bill. It is a Federal Penal Code. It creates Federal crimes which would take volumes to list and years to tabulate because it affects the lives of 192 million American citizens. Every person in every walk and station of life and every aspect of our daily lives becomes subject to the criminal provisions of this bill. It threatens our freedom of speech, of assembly, or association, and makes the exercise of these Freedoms a federal crime under certain conditions. It affects our political rights, our right to trial by jury, our right to the full use and enjoyment of our private property, the freedom from search and seizure of our private property and possessions, the freedom from harassment by Federal police and, in short, all the rights of individuals inherent in a society of free men. Ministers, lawyers, teachers, newspapers, and every private citizen must guard his speech and watch his actions to avoid the deliberately imposed booby traps put into this bill. It is designed to make Federal crimes of our customs, beliefs, and traditions. Therefore, under the fantastic powers of the Federal judiciary to punish for contempt of court and under their fantastic powers to regulate our most intimate aspects of our lives by injunction, every American citizen is in jeopardy and must stand guard against these despots. Yet there are those who call this a good bill.

163

It is people like Senator Hubert Humphrey and other members of Americans for Democratic Action. It is people like Ralph McGill and other left-wing radical apologists. They called it a good bill before it was amended to restore the right to trial by jury in certain cases. Yet a Federal judge may still try one without a jury under the provisions of this bill. It was the same persons who said it was a good bill before the amendment pretending to forbid busing of pupils from neighborhood schools. Yet a Federal judge may still order busing from one neighborhood school to another. They have done it, they will continue to do it. As a matter of fact, it is but another evidence of the deceitful intent of the sponsors of this bill for them to claim that it accomplished any such thing. It was left-wing radicals who led the fight in the Senate for the so-called civil rights bill now about to enslave our nation. We find Senator Hubert Humphrey telling the people of the United States that “non-violent” demonstrations would continue to serve a good purpose through a “long, busy and constructive summer.” Yet this same Senator told the people of this country that passage of this monstrous bill would ease tensions and stop demonstrations. This is the same Senator who has suggested, now that the Civil Rights Bill is passed, that the President call the fifty state Governors together to work out ways and means to enforce this rotten measure. There is no need for him to call on me. I am not about to be a party to anything having to do with the law that is going to destroy individual freedom and liberty in this country. I am having nothing to do with enforcing a law that will destroy our free enterprise system. I am having nothing to do with enforcing a law that will destroy neighborhood schools. I am having nothing to do with enforcing a law that will destroy the rights of private property.

164

I am having nothing to do with enforcing a law that destroys your right, and my right, to choose my neighbors, or to sell my house to whomever I choose. I am having nothing to do with enforcing a law that destroys the labor seniority system. I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it. The situation reminds me of the little boy looking at the blacksmith as he hammered a red-hot horseshoe into the proper shape. After minutes of hammering, the blacksmith took the horseshoe, splashed it into a tub of water and threw it steaming onto a sawdust pile. The little fellow picked up the horseshoe, dropped it quickly. “What’s the matter, son,” the blacksmith said, “is that shoe too hot to handle?” “No sir,” the little boy said, “it just don’t take me long to look at a horseshoe.” It’s not going to take the people of this country long to look at the Civil Rights Bill, either. And they are going to discard it just as quickly as the little boy tossed away the still hot horseshoe. But I am not here to talk about the separate provisions of the Federal Penal Code. I am here to talk about principles which have been overthrown by the enactment of this bill, the principles that you and I hold dear, the principles for which our forefathers fought and died to establish and to defend — the principles for which we came here to rededicate ourselves. But before I get into that, let me point out one important fact. It would have been impossible for the American people to have been deceived by the sponsors of this bill had there been a responsible American press to tell the people exactly what the bill contained. If they had had the integrity and the guts to tell the truth, this bill would never have been enacted.

165

Whoever heard of truth put to the worst in free and open encounter? We couldnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t get the truth to the American people. You and I know that thatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s extremely difficult to do where our newspapers are owned by out-of-state interests. Newspapers which are run and operated by left-wing liberals, Communist sympathizers, and members of the Americans for Democratic Action and other Communist front organizations with high sounding names. However, we will not be intimidated by the vultures of the liberal left-wing press. We will not be deceived by their lies and distortions of truth. We will not be swayed by their brutal attacks upon the character and reputation of any honest citizen who dares stand up and fight for liberty. And, we are not going to be influenced by intellectually bankrupt editors of the Atlanta Journal and Constitution, one of whom has presided over the dissolution of the once great Atlanta Constitution. We can understand his bitterness in his bleak failure, but we need not tolerate his vituperative and venomous attacks upon the integrity and character of our people. These editors, like many other left-wingers in the liberal press, are not influenced by tradition. Theirs is a tradition of scalawags. Their mealymouthed platitudes disgrace the honored memory of their predecessors â&#x20AC;&#x201D; such men of character as Henry Grady, Joel Chandler Harris, and Clarke Howell, men who made the name of the Atlanta Constitution familiar in every household throughout the South. They are not worthy to shine the shoes of those great men. In this connection I want to pay my highest respects and compliments to the dedicated men of Atlanta and of Georgia who gave to the people of their state what is destined to become the true voice of the south. I have reference to the great newspaper the Atlanta Times. It is a sad commentary on the period in which we live that it is necessary for the people of a great city to start their own newspaper in order to get the truth.

166

I hope you have some success in this venture and I assure you that there will be many subscribers in the State of Alabama including myself. As I have said before, that Federal Penal Code could never have been enacted into law if we had had a responsible press who was willing to tell the American people the truth about what it actually provides. Nor would we have had a bill had it not been for the United States Supreme Court. Now on the subject of the court let me make it clear that I am not attacking any member of the United States Supreme Court as an individual. However, I do attack their decisions, I question their intelligence, their common sense and their judgment, I consider the Federal Judiciary system to be the greatest single threat to individual freedom and liberty in the United States today, and I’m going to take off the gloves in talking about these people. There is only one word to describe the Federal judiciary today. That word is “lousy.” They assert more power than claimed by King George III, more power than Hitler, Mussolini, or Khrushchev ever had. They assert the power to declare unconstitutional our very thoughts. To create for us a system of moral and ethical values. To outlaw and declare unconstitutional, illegal, and immoral the customs, traditions, and beliefs of the people, and furthermore they assert the authority to enforce their decrees in all these subjects upon the American people without their consent. This is a matter that has been of great concern to many legal authorities. The Council of State Governments composed of representatives of the fifty States sponsored the proposal just last year seeking to curb the powers of this body of judicial tyrants. The Conference of Chief Justices of all of the state Supreme Courts of this nation has also issued an historic statement urging judicial restraint upon the Court. This latter group said, “the value of a firm statement by us lies in the fact that we speak as members of all the state

167

appellate courts with a background of many years experience in the determination of thousands of cases of all kinds. Surely there are those who will respect the declaration of what we believe. “It has long been an American boast that we have a government of laws and not of men. We believe that any study of recent decisions of the supreme court will raise at least considerable doubt as to the validity of that boast.” In addition, the state legislatures have for years flooded the Congress with resolutions condemning usurpations of power by the Federal judiciary. The court today, just as in 1776, is deaf to the voices of the people and their repeated entreaties: they have become arrogant, contemptuous, high-handed, and literal despots. It has been said that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. There was never greater evidence as to the proof of this statement than in the example of the present Federal Judiciary. I want to touch upon just a few of the acts of tyranny which have been sanctioned by the United States Supreme Court and compare these acts with the acts of tyranny enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. The colonists objected most strenuously to the imposition of taxes upon the people without their consent. Today, the Federal judiciary asserts the same tyrannical power to levy taxes in Prince Edward County, Virginia, and without the consent of the people. Not only that, but they insist upon the power to tell the people for what purposes their money must be spent. The colonists stated, “He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.” Today, the Federal judiciary, in one of its most recent decisions, has deprived the American people of the right

168

to use the unit system of representation in their own state governments for the accommodation of large districts of people, and has itself prescribed the manner in which the people shall structure the legislative branch of their own government, and have prescribed how the people shall allocate the legislative powers of state government. More than that they have even told the American people that we may not, with a majority of the people voting for the measure, or with two-thirds of those voting, or even if by unanimous consent, adopt a provision in our state constitutions to allocate the legislative power of state government in any manner other than as prescribed by the court. One justice of the United States Supreme Court said in this connection, and I quote, “To put the matter plainly, there is nothing in all the history of this Court’s decisions which supports this Constitutional rule. The Court’s draconian pronouncement which makes unconstitutional the legislatures of most of the fifty states finds no support in the words of the constitution in any prior decision of this court or in the 175year political history of our Federal union, These decisions mark a long step backward into the unhappy era where a majority of the members of this court were thought by many to have convinced themselves and each other that the demands of the constitution were to be measured not by what it says buy by their own notions of wise political theory.” Two other Justices of the Court said, “such a massive repudiation of the experience of our whole past in asserting destructively novel Judicial power demands analysis of the role of this Court and our Constitutional scheme.; It may well impair the Court’s position as the ultimate organ of the Supreme Law of the Land. . .” The only reason it is the Supreme Law of the Land today is because we have a President who cares so little for freedom that he would send the armed forces into the states to enforce the dictatorial decree. Our colonist forefather had something to say about that too.

169

The Declaration of Independence cited as an act of tyranny the fact that, “Kept among us in times of peace standing armies without the consent of the legislature.” Today, 188 years later, we have actually witnessed the invasion of the State of Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama by the armed forces of the United States and maintained in the state against the will of the people and without consent of state legislatures. It is a form of tyranny worse than that of King George III who had sent mercenaries against the colonies because today the Federal Judicial tyrants have sanctioned the use of brother against brother and father against son by federalizing the National Guard. In 1776 the colonists also complained that the monarch “Has incited domestic insurrections among us...” Today, we have absolute proof that the Federal Department of Justice has planned, supervised, financed and protected acts of insurrection in the southern states, resulting in vandalism, property damage, personal injury, and staggering expense to the states. In 1776 it was charged that the monarchy had asserted power to “Dissolve representative houses and to punish, For opposing with manly firmness his invasions of the rights of the people —” Today, the Federal judiciary asserts the power not only to dissolve state legislatures but to create them and to dissolve all state laws and state judicial decrees, and to punish a state governor by trial without jury “For opposing with manly firmness his invasions of the rights of the people —” The colonists also listed as acts of tyranny: “The erection of a multitude of new offices and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and to eat out their substance...” “Suspending our own legislatures and declaring themselves invested with the power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever”; “Abolishing the free system of the English laws...”

170

— it had “abdicated government here”; — “refusing to assent to the laws enacted by the people”; — “Laws considered most wholesome and necessary for the public good;” — and “For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury... For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally form of our government; for suspending our own legislatures and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.” The United States Supreme Court is guilty of each and every one of these acts of tyranny. Therefore, I echo the sentiments of our forefathers who declared: “a prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people” Ladies and gentlemen, I have listed only a few of the many acts of tyranny which have been committed or specifically sanctioned by the United States Supreme Court. I feel it important that you should know and understand what it is that these people are trying to do. The written opinions of the court are filled with double talk, semantics, jargon, and meaningless phrases. The words they use are not important. The ideas that they represent are the things which count. It is perfectly obvious from the left-wing liberal press and from the left-wing law journals that what the court is saying behind all the jargon is that they don’t like our form of government. They think they can establish a better one. In order to do so it is necessary that they overthrow our existing form, destroy the democratic institutions created by the people, change the outlook, religion, and philosophy, and bring the whole area of human thought, aspiration, action and organization, under the absolute control of the court. Their decisions reveal this to be the goal of the liberal element on the court which is in a

171

majority at present. It has reached the point where one may no longer look to judicial decisions to determine what the court may do. However, it is possible to predict with accuracy the nature of the opinions to be rendered. One may find the answer in the Communist Manifesto. The Communists are dedicated to the overthrow of our form of government. They are dedicated to the destruction of the concept of private property. They are dedicated to the object of destroying religion as the basis of moral and ethical values. The Communists are determined that all natural resources shall be controlled by the central government, that all productive capacity of the nation shall be under the control of the central government, that the political sovereignty of the people shall be destroyed as an incident to control of local schools. It is their objective to capture the minds of our youth in order to indoctrinate them in what to think and not how to think. I do not call the members of the United States Supreme Court Communists. But I do say, and I submit for your judgment the fact that every single decision of the court in the past ten years which related in any way to each of these objectives has been decided against freedom and in favor of tyranny. A politician must stand on his record. Let the Court stand on its record. The record reveals, for the past number of years, that the chief, if not the only beneficiaries of the present Court’s rulings, have been duly and lawfully convicted criminals, Communists, atheists, and clients of vociferous left-wing minority groups. You can’t convict a Communist in our Federal court system. Neither can you convict one of being a Communist in Russia, China, or Cuba. The point is that the United States Supreme Court refuses to recognize the Communist conspiracy and their intent to “bury us.” Let us look at the record further with respect to the court’s contribution to the destruction of the concept of God and the

172

abolition of religion. The Federal court rules that your children shall not be permitted to read the Bible in our public school systems. Let me tell you this, though. We still read the Bible in Alabama schools, and as long as I am governor we will continue to read the Bible no matter what the Supreme Court says. Federal courts will not convict a “demonstrator” invading and destroying private property. But the Federal courts rule you cannot say a simple “God is great, God is good, we thank Thee for our food,” in kindergartens supported by public funds. Now, let us examine the manner in which the Court has continuously chipped away at the concept of private property. It is contended by the left-wing liberals that private property is merely a legal fiction. That one has no inherent right to own and possess property. The courts have restricted and limited the right of acquisition of property in life and have decreed its disposition in death and have ruthlessly set aside the wills of the dead in order to attain social ends decreed by the court. The court has substituted its judgment for that of the testator based on social theory. The courts assert authority even in decree the use of private cemeteries. They assert the right to convert a private place of business into a public place of business without the consent of the owner and without compensation to him. One justice asserts that the mere licensing of a business by the state is sufficient to convert it into control by the Federal judiciary as to its use and disposition. Another asserts that the guarantees of equal protection and due process of law cannot be extended to a corporation. In one instance, following the edicts of the United States Supreme Court, a state Supreme Court has ordered and directed a private citizen to sell his home to an individual contrary to the wishes of the owner. In California we witnessed a state Supreme Court taking under advisement the question as to whether or not it will

173

compel a bank to make a load to an applicant on the basis of his race. We have witnessed the sanction by the courts of confiscatory taxation. Let us take a look at the attitude of the court with respect to the control of the private resources of the nation and the allocation of the productive capacity of the nation. The Supreme Court decisions have sanctioned enactment of the civil rights bill. What this bill actually does is to empower the United States government to reallocate the entire productive capacity of the agricultural economy covered by quotas and acreage allotments of various types on the basis of race, creed, color and national origin. It, in effect, places in the hands of the Federal government the right of a farmer to earn a living, making that right dependent upon the consent of the Federal government precisely as is the case in Russia. The power is there. I am not in the least impressed by the protestations that the government will use this power with benevolent discretion. We know that this bill authorizes the President of the united states to allocate all defense productive capacity of this country on the basis of race, creed, or color. It does not matter in the least that he will make such allocations with restraint. The face is that it is possible with a politically dominated agency to punish and to bankrupt and destroy any business that deals with the Federal government if it does not bow to the wishes and demands of the president of the United States. All of us know what the court has done to capture the minds of our children. The Federal judiciary has asserted the authority to prescribe regulations with respect to the management, operation, and control of our local schools. The second brown decision in the infamous school segregation case authorized

174

Federal district courts to supervise such matters as teacher hiring, firing, promotion, the expenditure of local funds, both administratively and for capital improvements, additions, and renovations, the location of new schools, the drawing of school boundaries, busing and transportation of school children, and, believe it or not, it has asserted the right in the Federal judiciary to pass judgment upon the curricula adopted in local public schools. A comparatively recent Federal court decision in a Florida case actually entered an order embracing each and every one of these assertions of Federal supervision. In ruling after ruling, the Supreme Court has overstepped its constitutional authority. While appearing to protect the peopleâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s interest, it has in reality become a judicial tyrant. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s the old pattern. The people always have some champion whom they set over them, And nurse into greatness. This, and no other, is the foot from which a tyrant springs, after first appearing as a protector. This is another way of saying that the people never give up their liberties, And their freedom, But under some delusion. But yet there is hope. There is yet a spirit of resistance in this country which will not be oppressed. And it is awakening. And I am sure there is an abundance of good sense in this country which cannot be deceived. I have personal knowledge of this. Thirty-four percent of the Wisconsin Democrats supported the beliefs you and I uphold and expound. Thirty percent of the Democrats in Indiana join us in fighting this grab for executive power by those now in control in Washington. And, listen to this, forty-three percent of the Democrats in Maryland, practically in view of the nationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s capital, believe as you and I believe. So, let me say to you today. Take heart. Millions of Americans believe just as we in this great region of the United States

175

believe. I shall never forget last spring as I stood in the midst of a great throng of South Milwaukee supporters at one of the greatest political rallies I have ever witnessed. A fine-looking man grabbed my hand and said: “Governor, I’ve never been south of South Milwaukee, but I am a Southerner!” Of course, he was saying he believed in the principles and philosophy of the southern people, Of you here today and the people of my state of Alabama. He was right. Being a Southerner is no longer geographic. It’s a philosophy and an attitude. One destined to be a national philosophy — embraced by millions of Americans — which shall assume the mantle of leadership and steady a governmental structure in these days of crises. Certainly I am a candidate for President of the United States. If the left-wingers do not think I am serious — let them consider this. I am going to take our fight to the people — the court of public opinion — where truth and common sense will eventually prevail. At this time, I have definite, concrete plans to get presidential electors pledged to me on the ballots in the following states: Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, New York, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Missouri, Kentucky, Arkansas, Tennessee, and of course Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana. Other states are under serious consideration. A candidate for President must receive 270 electoral votes to win. The states I am definitely going to enter represent 218 electoral votes. Conservatives of this nation constitute the balance of power in presidential elections.

176

I am a conservative. I intend to give the American people a clear choice. I welcome a fight between our philosophy and the liberal left-wing dogma which now threatens to engulf every man, woman, and child in the United States. I am in this race because I believe the American people have been pushed around long enough and that they, like you and I, are fed up with the continuing trend toward a socialist state which now subjects the individual to the dictates of an allpowerful central government. I am running for President because I was born free. I want to remain free. I want your children and mine and our prosperity to be unencumbered by the manipulations of a soulless state. I intend to fight for a positive, affirmative program to restore constitutional government and to stop the senseless bloodletting now being performed on the body of liberty by those who lead us willingly and dangerously close to a totalitarian central government. In our nation, man has always been sovereign and the state has been his servant. This philosophy has made the United States the greatest free nation in history. This freedom was not a gift. It was won by work, by sweat, by tears, by war, by whatever it took to be â&#x20AC;&#x201D; and to remain free. Are we today less resolute, less determined and courageous than our fathers and our grandfathers? Are we to abandon this priceless heritage that has carried us to our present position of achievement and leadership? I say if we are to abandon our heritage, let it be done in the open and full knowledge of what we do. We are not unmindful and careless of our future. We will not stand aside while our conscientious convictions tell us that a dictatorial Supreme Court has taken away our rights and our liberties. We will not stand idly by while the Supreme Court continues to invade the prerogatives left rightfully to the states by the

177

constitution. We must not be misled by left-wing incompetent news media that day after day feed us a diet of fantasy telling us we are bigots, racists and hate-mongers to oppose the destruction of the constitution and our nation. A left-wing monster has risen up in this nation. It has invaded the government. It has invaded the news media. It has invaded the leadership of many of our churches. It has invaded every phase and aspect of the life of freedom-loving people. It consists of many and various and powerful interests, but it has combined into one massive drive and is held together by the cohesive power of the emotion, setting forth civil rights as supreme to all. But, in reality, it is a drive to destroy the rights of private property, to destroy the freedom and liberty of you and me. And, my friends, where there are no property rights, there are no human rights. Red China and Soviet Russia are prime examples. Politically evil men have combined and arranged themselves against us. The good people of this nation must now associate themselves together, else we will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a struggle which threatens to engulf the entire nation. We can win. We can control the election of the president in November. Our object must be our country, our whole country and nothing but our country. If we will stand together â&#x20AC;&#x201D; the people of this state--the people of my state--the people throughout this great region-yes, throughout the United States â&#x20AC;&#x201D; then we can be the balance of power. We can determine who will be the next president. Georgia is a great state. Atlanta is a great city. I know you will demonstrate that greatness in November by joining alabama and other states throughout the south in electing the

178

next president of the United States. We are not going to change anything by sitting on our hands hoping that things will change for the better. Those who cherish individual freedom have a job to do. First, let us let it be known that we intend to take the offensive and carry our fight for freedom across this nation. We will wield the power that is ours--the power of the people. Let it be known that we will no longer tolerate the boot of tyranny. We will no longer hide our heads in the sand. We will reschool our thoughts in the lessons our forefathers knew so well. We must destroy the power to dictate, to forbid, to require, to demand, to distribute, to edict, and to judge what is best and enforce that will of judgment upon free citizens. We must revitalize a government founded in this nation on faith in God. I ask that you join with me and that together, we give an active and courageous leadership to the millions of people throughout this nation who look with hope and faith to our fight to preserve our constitutional system of government with its guarantees of liberty and justice for all within the framework of our priceless freedoms.

179

“What Does the White Man Owe Blacks?” Michael D. Carroll April 2012 No one who completely understands the current position of the Afro-American Negro can deny the fact that in 2012 he has become a professional victim. Thanks mainly to the preaching of victimization that has been pounded into the sub-conscious of the Afro-American Negro by paternalistic white liberals; charlatans, crooks and thieves left over from the civil rights movement; and a conclave of ignorant and buffoonish clergy who upon every waking moment convinces the American Negro that everything dysfunctional that takes place in black America can be folded neatly and tucked away and placed at the doorstep of the ongoing legacy of slavery. When you have a conversation with an Afro-American and you ask them: what is it that the white man owes you after everything that he has already given you? What is it that you feel that you are lacking. What stone has the American white man left unturned, that you feel needs to be uprooted, that will balance the scales from the ongoing demonic legacy of slavery? The Negroes, most of them, have no answer. Because in hindsight, if you review the history and you understand what it is that the American white man gave the Negro, the fact that 80 percent of black people hold dear to the Bible, Christianity, can be placed at the door step of slavery. When the African slaves were brought here, they didn’t speak English, they couldn’t read the Bible, they weren’t allowed to be Christians. It was only after the slave master realized (that) allowing the slaves to embrace Christianity in fact made better slaves of them, that large numbers of Negro slaves embraced this religion. The fact that many of your historically black colleges and universities were in fact founded and financed by ex-slave owners, who took some of their wealth and placed it towards some of the black colleges and universities.

180

When you review the civil rights bills, the amendments to the Constitution, when you review affirmative action policies, government set-asides, outlawing discrimination in the work force, in education, in housing. And the fact that today, in 2012, you Negroes can now eat rib tips and lobster that you purchased with your monthly allotment of food stamps. The remaining balance you will now go sell to some Lebanese or Arab owned store that dots your community, gaining a few extra dollars that you will put towards your monthly payment for your SUV sitting on forty-inch chrome rims, that by the way, you have parked outside of your government subsidized house or apartment. So, upon further review, Negro; what is it that this white man owes you? After all that he has given you? And, everything that white man has given you, Negro, you have still failed to position yourself into the mainstream of American culture. Ethnic groups that just got here yesterday are leap-frogging you. They’re leaving you behind because you stand twiddling your thumbs with your hands out expecting a government hand-out. What does the white man owe you, Negro? When you take into consideration that if he won’t hire you, then why don’t you take it upon yourself to be an entrepreneur and create wealth for you and your own people? Everybody else does it! Why is it that you must expect a hand-out at every turn? Negro, you have 850 billion dollars, and these are conservative numbers, that flows through your community, that equals the GNP of some countries in Europe. This money that you spend on cognac, liquor, bourbon, weed, spinning rims, strippers, and of course you pay a few pastors’ salaries. But you have done absolutely nothing with this wealth. But yet you consider and claim that you are poor and that you need a hand-out and because of slavery you can’t make it. Negro, you never picked any cotton! You never felt the lash or the sting of the lash.

181

Negro, today in 2012 the black race has more college educated citizens then we’ve ever had in our sojourn in the nation. With all of your black colleges and universities, with all of your black college graduates. With all of your black entertainers and athletes. With all of this wealth flowing through your community, Negro, you still stand twiddling your thumbs, expecting a handout. And the only reason why you do this is because you are a professional victim. And you have embraced a doctrine of victimization that has been preached to you by hypocritical white liberals who want to keep you on the Democratic slave plantation; preached to you by crooks from the civil rights movement, men like Jesse Jackson and Al Charlatan and a conclave of ignorant buffoonish Negro pastors who don’t even begin to understand the history of the Bible that they stand up and try to preach on Sunday morning. This is the condition of the American Negro. So, in light of all these facts—what is it that the white man owes you? He’s given you his daughter – well, he hasn’t really given you his daughter, but he’s not lynching you for dating his daughter. There’s no lynch mob looking to accost you because you walk down one of the local malls holding the hand of Becky. They’re not looking to lynch you, Negro, because you’re producing half-breed babies with white women. So, what is it that this white man – what stone has he left unturned for you, coon? What has he not given you, that today, in 2012, that if he only gave me that—the scales would be balanced? And, before you answer that question, Negro, keep in mind that 850 billion dollars flows through the black community annually. You spend $250 on a pair of Air-Jordan sneakers, you got all this bling-bling around your neck, riding around in the latest SUVs. All of this wealth, but somehow you figure that he owes me something else. What is it that he owes you, Negro?! And then, what really puts this whole doctrine of victimization, is that not only were you not a slave, Negro, but

182

these white people that youâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re expecting to pay you for slavery, never owned any slaves. This is most baffling to me. But this only goes to show you the thinking of the Afro-American Negro in 2012 and how he refuses to do for himself what other cultures have done for their selves. The people who came through Ellis Island came here with the clothes on their back and they rolled up their sleeves and they got busy. And they tried to create a future for themselves and their children, not expecting a government hand-out, not looking for the government to pave their way. But you, Negro, with all of your bling-bling in 2012, you still sit [65]. [Note: Mr. Carroll is a black American. - RSO3]

183

WHITE NATIONALIST Q & A Q. What is a person? A. An human being, an embodied soul created by God Q. What is a race? A. A race, or continental community group, is a group of human beings defined by distinctive biological traits resulting from their ancestral adaptation to their environment. Q. What races exist? A. Mankind has developed into three anthropologically distinct racial groups: the African (sometimes called Negroid), the Eurasian (sometimes called Caucasian), and the East Asian (Mongoloid). The peoples of the world are all descended from these races. Q. What distinguishes one race from another? A. Biological differences, ethnic differences, and cultural differences. Each race is biologically and culturally best adapted to survive in its original environment. Q. Are the races equal? A. Yes and no. While members of all races are human beings and are equal in the sight of God, each race has its typical strengths and weaknesses of ability. Q. Must one race dominate the others? A. No. No race has the right to dominate any other on biological grounds. Each race has the right to exist. Q. What traits are typical of members of the Caucasian race? A. Generally speaking, Caucasians are genetically adapted for living in a northern European environment and display a range of distinctive pale or olive skin tones, straight or

curly hair, and lighter-colored eyes. They share the lactose tolerance, high average intelligence, and other traits typical of the original peoples of Eurasia, the Middle East and North Africa. Q. What are White people? A. White people are a subset of the Caucasian race. They are the people of the European Diaspora – that is, Caucasians who are living outside of Europe. In the context of life in North America, White people are the nation of persons descended from immigrants of European origin. Q. Are native Europeans White people? A. Yes and no. Europeans are racially Caucasian, but ethnically they are divided into the various nationalities – Saxons, Finns, Celts, etc. Their primary loyalty is to these nationalities and to the ethnostates that spring from them. Caucasians outside of Europe have no such ethnostates. They are simply “the white people”. As a people, they therefore form a universal Caucasian nation – the White nation. Q. What does it meant for Whites to exist “as White people”? A. It means that Whites exist as a distinct biological, ethnic, and cultural entity and have the right to preserve and protect their genetic, cultural, and spiritual patrimony. Q. Aren’t Whites guilty of colonialism, exploitation, and slavery? A. Colonialism, exploitation, and slavery are not behaviors unique to the White race. Over the centuries, many Asian and African societies have also engaged in colonialism, exploitation and slavery. The word “slave” itself comes from the word Slav, thus demonstrating that white people are no less the historic subjects of slavery than are members of the other races. Slavery is still practiced today in many non-White nations.

REFERENCES 1. Paul Kersey, “War Zone, USA: The Black Undertow Provides Multiple Cities to Train Military Emergency Personnel to Deal with the Horrors of War”, Stuff Black People Don’t Like. Stuffblackpeopledontlike.com, Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2. “What is ‘Political Correctness’?, William S. Lind, The Locust. http://whitelocust. wordpress.com/america-in-crisis-the-triumph-of-political-correctness/what-is%E2%80%9Cpolitical-correctness%E2%80%9D-and-the-overthrow-of-the-american-republic/] 3. Hunter Wallace, http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/008289.html 4. Dennis Prager, “Why are so many Jews liberal?”, Jewish World Review April 25, 2006. http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0406/prager042506.php3 5. The Death of Jewish Liberalism”, Daniel Greenfield, Frontpage Magazine, Jun 19th, 2012. http://frontpagemag.com/2012/06/19/the-death-of-jewish-liberalism/ 6. “Yosef: Gentiles exist only to serve Jews”, Jonah Mandel, The Jerusalem Post, 10/18/2010. 7. “ADL slams Shas spiritual leader for saying non-Jews ‘were born to serve Jews’”, Natasha Mozgovaya, Haaretz, Oct.20, 2010 8. Lawrence Auster, http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/011131.html 9. “#47. Disingenuous White Liberals”, Paul Kersey, Friday, July 17, 2009 op cit. http:// stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2009/07/47-disingenuous-white-liberals.html 10. David Brooks, quoted in “The Smackdown Of The Creative Class”, Joel Kotkin, 3 November 2010. http://www.forbes.com/2010/11/03/ midterm-elections-obama-opinions-kotkin.html 11. “Revolt of America’s Middle Class”, Fellowship of the Minds, November 4, 2010. https://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/tag/bi-coastal-elites/] 12. “Surprise, Surprise! Highly educated white liberals are hypocrites”, Steve Sailer, Steve Sailer’s iSteve Blog, Thursday, December 21, 2006. http:// isteve.blogspot.com/2006/12/surprise-surprise-highly-educated.html 13. Adapted from “Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Rise of Black Run Amerika”, Hunter Wallace, Occidental Dissent, January 16, 2012. http://www.occidentaldissent. com/2012/01/16/martin-luther-king-jr-and-the-rise-of-Black Run-amerika/ 14. Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), usdoj.gov; Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reporting Program, fbi.gov 15. Republicrat, “Occupying Privilege”, Occidental Dissent, June 4, 2012 16. Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority, 4th Revised Edition, 1996

186

17. “Generality of Psychopathy Checklist Revised Factors Over Prisoners and SubstanceDependent Patients”, Paul A. McDermott, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania; Arthur I. Alterman, John S. Cacciola, and Ellen M. Mulholland, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia; Megan J. Rutherford, Alcohol and Drug Institute, University of Washington; Joseph P. Newman, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin--Madison; Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2000, Vol. 68, No. 1, 181-186. http://psych.wisc.edu/newman/SecurePDF/Mcdermott%202000.pdf 18. http://www.waspc.org/files.php?fid=3930 19. http://www.njsp.org/info/ucr2010/pdf/2010_sect_3.pdf 20.http://gbi.georgia.gov/vgn/images/portal/ cit_1210/13/41/1598322302009%20Summary%20Report.pdf 21. Demographic data: U.S. Census, 2010. Crime data: FBI, Uniform Crime Report. Source: Michael B. Sauter, Douglas A. McIntyre, Ashley C. Allen, Alexander E. M. Hess, Lisa Nelson and Samuel Weigley, 24/7 Wall St., June 18, 2012. http://247wallst.com/2012/06/11/the-most-dangerous-cities-in-america-2/ 22. http://www.mshp.dps.missouri.gov/MSHPWeb/SAC/index_960grid.html 23. APD Uniform Crime Reports, Apr 2011 to Apr 2012] 24. “Internalized Racism’s Association with African American Male Youth’s Propensity for Violence”, Wesley W. Bryant, Journal of Black Studies, March 17, 2011; http://jbs.sagepub.com/content/42/4/690.abstract 25. http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/06/02/black-man-disguisedas-elderly-man-allegedly-robbed-11-norcal-banks/ 26. Harold Stowe, “The Genetics of Race”, American Renaissance, July 2006 27. Ibid. 28. Tim Wise, “An Open Letter to the White Right, On the Occasion of Your Recent, Successful Temper Tantrum”, Daily Kos, 3 November 2010. http:// www.dailykos.com/story/2010/11/03/916577/-An-Open-Letter-to-the-WhiteRight-On-the-Occasion-of-Your-Recent-Successful-Temper-Tantrum# 29. Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority, 1972, p. 101 30. Lawrence Auster, ‘What is European America?”. http:// www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/001631.html] 31. “The Fallout of ‘Downfall’: Your questions answered”, Alternative Right, 9 June 2012 http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/zeitgeist/the-fallout-of-downfall/ 32. “Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease”, Neil Risch, Esteban Burchard, Elad Ziv, Hua Tang. Genome Biol. 2002; 3(7): comment2007.1–comment2007.12. Published online 2002 July 1 at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC139378 33. An Asian Origin for Human Ancestors?”, Ann Gibbons, Science Now. 4 June 2012. http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/06/an-asian-origin-for-human-ancest.html

187

34. “Genetic Origins of the Japanese: A Partial Support for the Dual Structure Hypothesis”, Keiichi Omoto (Center for Japanese Studies, Kyoto), Naruya Saitoh (National Institute of Genetics, Mishima), American Journal of Physical Anthropology,102:437–446 (1997). http://sayer.lab.nig.ac.jp/~saitou/paper-pdf/Omoto_AJPA97.pdf] 35. http://takimag.com/article/recolonizing_the_dark_ continent_hannes_wessels/print#ixzz1wnnWQGts 36. “Snap Back”, Hunter Wallace, Occidental Dissent, June 23, 2012. http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2012/06/23/snap-back/ 37. Genesis 3:22 38. Yockey, The Declaration of London, 1949 39. “Miscegenation”: Making Race in America , by Elise Lemire, University of Pennsylvania press, 2002 40. ”Domestic Violence”, Lynn Barkley Burnett, MD, EdD, LLB(c) and Jonathan Adler, MD. Op. cit. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/805546-overview#a0199 41. “Fatal Violence Among Spouses in the United States, 1976-85”, James A. Mercy and Linda Saltzman, American Journal of Public Health, May, 1989 42. Udry, “Health and Behavior Risks of Adolescents with Mixed-Race Identity”, American Journal of Public Health, November 2003 43. Roland G. Fryer, Jr, Lisa Kahn, Steven D. Levitt, Jörg L. Spenkuch , “The Plight of Mixed Race Adolescents,” NBER Working Paper No. 14192, July, 2008. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14192 44. “Bi-Racial Asian Americans More Likely to Suffer Psychological Disorder”, UCDavis, August 18, 2008. Op. cit. http://news.smashits.com/284721/Bi-racialAsian-Americans-more-likely-to-suffer-psychological-disorder.htm 45. http://www.cdc.gov/std/health-disparities/race.htm 46. http://jmh.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/08/09/1557988311416496.abstract 47. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1349500/ 48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447915/ 49. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/01/29/us/20110130mixedrace.html?ref=us 50. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/3/471.abstract 51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22081799 . Op. Cit. “Perils of Miscegenation/Why White Women Shouldn’t Date Black Men”, Unamused (pseud.), Unamusement Park, 1 July 2012. http://unamusementpark.com/lists/ perils-of-miscegenation-why-white-women-shouldnt-date-black-men/ 52. “‘Race Purists’—Are They ‘Slightly Nuts’?”, Jared Taylor, Vdare. com, June 20, 2012. http://www.vdare.com/articles/race-purists-arethey-slightly-nuts-jared-taylor-responds-to-john-derbyshire 53. Adam Cornford, “‘Colorless All-Color’: Notes on White Culture”, Bad Subjects: Race

Issue, Race, September 1997. http://bad.eserver.org/issues/1997/33/cornford.html 54. Washington, Booker T. (2009-10-04). Up from Slavery: an autobiography (p. 17). Public Domain Books. Kindle Edition 55. Ibid. 56. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus0602.pdf 57. Jobbik Manifesto. http://www.jobbik.com/sites/default/ files/Jobbik-RADICALCHANGE2010.pdf 58. “The European Origins of Economic Development”, William Easterly, Ross Levine; NBER Working Paper No. 18162, June 2012. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18162 59. West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. cited at “Restrictive Covenant”. The Free Dictionary, http://legaldictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Restrictive+Covenant 60. “Natural Elites, Intellectuals, and the State”, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Ph.D, Ludwig von Mises Institute. Op. cit. http://mises.org/etexts/intellectuals.asp) 61. Hunter Wallace, “Connie Chastain, Fort Deposit, BRA, and Southern Nationalism”, Occidental Dissent, July 19, 2012. http://www.occidentaldissent. com/2012/07/19/connie-chastain-fort-deposit-bra-and-southern-nationalism/ 62. Adapted from “A Reply to Hunter Wallace, ‘Deep South: The Racial Challenge’”, White & Confederate [pseud.]. Occidental Dissent, May 21, 2012. http://www.occidentaldissent. com/2012/05/21/deep-south-the-racial-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-541226 63. “Nocturne in Black and White”, Sultan Knish, Tuesday, May 29, 2012. http://bit.ly/M8uT0Y 64. Thomas Sowell, Ph.D, “A Censored Race War?”, Real Clear Politics, 15 May 2012 http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/15/a_censored_race_war_114150.html 65.“What does the white man owe blacks?” Michael Carroll, May 26, 2012. http://youtu.be/RdxQbBk4huA

The Stranger The Stranger within my gate, He may be true or kind, But he does not talk my talk— I cannot feel his mind. I see the face and the eyes and the mouth, But not the soul behind. The men of my own stock, They may do ill or well, But they tell the lies I am wonted to, They are used to the lies I tell; And we do not need interpreters When we go to buy or sell. The Stranger within my gates, He may be evil or good, But I cannot tell what powers control— What reasons sway his mood; Nor when the Gods of his far-off land Shall repossess his blood. The men of my own stock, Bitter bad they may be, But, at least, they hear the things I hear, And see the things I see; And whatever I think of them and their likes They think of the likes of me. This was my father’s belief And this is also mine: Let the corn be all one sheaf— And the grapes be all one vine, Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge By bitter bread and wine. Rudyard Kipling 1912

a flag for white people Black people in America have a flag. So do other ethnic, racial, and cultural groups around the world. I think White people outside of Europe should have a flag of their own as well. I have created this flag as my proposal for the flag of the White Diaspora. The flag is blazoned azure, argent a snowflake (a white snowflake centered upon a royal blue field). The blue field represents Europe, Christianity, loyalty, and peace. The white snowflake symbolizes the northern heritage of White people, with its six arms (representing the global White Diaspora) stretched out to every part of the Earth.

192

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Section II, subsection G “The Mantra” is based upon “The Mantra” by Robert F. Whitaker. Please visit Mr. Whitaker’s website at whitakeronline.org. for more information. Find further information on topics treated of in this book at: SBPDL [stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com] Unamusement Park [unamusementpark.com] Occidental Dissent [occidentaldissent.com] JewAmongYou [jewamongyou.wordpress.com] American Renaissance [amren.org] The Big Lie on Parade [biglieonparade.blogspot.com/] View From the Right [http://www.amnation.com/vfr/] Opinions expressed in this work are entirely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners of the websites listed above. Opinions expressed on the above-listed websites do not necessarily represent the opinons of the author of this book. This book is in the public domain. All text and other information contained within this work, unless otherwise noted, and excepting citations from the works of other authors within presented under the terms of fair use, is wholly the work of Robert S. Oculus III. The entire content of this book is hereby released into the public domain, with no rights reserved. This book may be copied, distributed, and quoted freely so long as it is distributed without charge and its original contents are preserved unaltered and unabridged. Any mistakes, errors, or omissions within this book are the sole responsibility of the author. Any violation of copyright or other intellectual property laws within the text of this book is unintentional. Version 2.0. Spring A.D. 2015 NOT FOR HATRED OF OTHERS, BUT FOR LOVE OF OUR OWN

This nation was never meant to be a unit of one, but a united of the many. That is the exact reason our freedom loving forefathers established the states, so as to divide the rights and powers among the states, insuring that no central power could gain master government controlâ&#x20AC;Ś And so it was meant in our racial lives, each race, within its own framework has the freedom to teach; to instruct; to develop; to ask for and receive deserved help from others of separate racial stations. This is the great freedom of our American founding fathers, but if we amalgamate into the one unit as advocated by the communist philosophers; then the enrichment of our lives, the freedom for our development, is gone forever. We become, therefore, a mongrel unit of one under a single all powerful government, and we stand for everything â&#x20AC;&#x201D; and for nothing. â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Alabama Governor George C. Wallace, 1963

194

195