YALE DAILY NEWS · FRIDAY, JANUARY 28, 2022 · yaledailynews.com
PAGE 5
FROM THE FRONT
" Whosoever is delighted in solitude is either a wild beast or a god." ARISTOTLE GREEK PHILOSOPHY
Applications break 50,000 for the first time APPS FROM PAGE 1 outreach and communications at the Office of Undergraduate Admissions, credited virtual outreach methods with the record applicant pool. “The consistent increases in applications are a positive sign that our pivot to a virtual outreach strategy has been successful,” Dunn told the News. “Although there is no substitute for visiting campus — and we hope that we can continue welcoming campus visitors as soon as possible — it is clear that new virtual events have allowed us to connect with more prospective students and to feature amazing Yale students in a new way.” The admissions office has employed virtual tours, online information sessions and video and poster campaigns to showcase the University. But Dunn also credited current students as the office's “most valuable asset” in outreach. Dunn noted that the increase in international student applicants outpaced domestic application growth this year, though both have risen in the past two application cycles. Last year, international applicants also accounted for the majority of the historic rise in applications. “We are impressed by the variety of students throughout the world who are seeking the opportunity to study at Yale next year,” said Keith Light, associate director of admissions and director of international admissions. “We are truly seeing the very best prospects from more than 150 countries and territories from all four hemispheres.” Regular decision applications were due on Jan. 2. Contact JORDAN FITZGERALD at jordan.fitzgerald@yale.edu .
Yale received 50,022 applications to join the University’s class of 2026, the most in the school’s history.
LUKAS FLIPPO/SENIOR PHOTOGRAPHER
Amid human rights violations, U. investigates Chinese holdings CHINA FROM PAGE 1 tions in China. Since 2017, the Chinese government has been engaged in a process of systemic oppression of the Uyghur Muslim population in western China, drawing widespread condemnation. “We’re in the process of [probing possible Chinese investments],” law professor Jonathan Macey LAW ’82 said. “We’re going to be starting to do that early in the semester.” The University’s Advisory Committee on Investor Responsibility, or ACIR, is responsible for ensuring that Yale allocates its investments in accordance with social and political standards, and works in tandem with the Yale Corporation Committee on Investor Responsibility, or CCIR, which makes final decisions on investment practices. Both committees were heavily involved in implementing the University’s new fossil fuel investment principles in April. Macey, who chairs the ACIR, explained that the committee had not undertaken this investigation until recently because it had been
predominantly focused on the question of divestment from fossil fuels. Though the committee has not yet started its review, Macey said he suspects that some companies will not meet Yale’s principles for investment. “My intuition is that there’ll be a range of activities among companies and that some might be eligible for divestment,” Macey said. When asked in an interview, Salovey would not guarantee that any company that Yale is invested in is not involved in any of the ongoing human rights abuses in China. However, he said that when the University uses a hedge fund manager in China, the Investments Office “makes our principles clear to that fund manager” and requires transparency in the investments. He added that there is a mechanism by which students can raise concerns over Yale’s investment practices. “In any geography, we partner only with investment managers who meet our sterling ethical standards, and our relationships in China are no exception,” Mendelsohn wrote in an email to the News.
Some members of the Yale community have previously called for Yale to sever all of its financial ties with China, including with private businesses, due to ongoing human rights violations. According to a report from the Center for Strategic and International Security, “the [Chinese Communist] Party’s overall aim appears to be to ensure that a wide range of businesses are under the influence of the CCP and willing to work with it to achieve national strategic objectives.” Rayhan Asat, a human rights lawyer focused on the Uyghur crisis in China and former Yale World Fellow, wrote in an email to the News that while private companies have been instrumental in Chinese economic growth, the government has begun to crackdown on them, especially when they “get in the way of the Chinese government’s specific goal.” Macey, however, disagreed that Yale should divest from all Chinese companies. “I don’t think that doing business in China or having a relationship with the Chinese gov-
AMAY TEWARI/SENIOR PHOTOGRAPHER
Since 2017, the Chinese government has perpetrated a genocide against its Uyghur population.
ernment is something that is automatically grounds for divestment,” Macey said. “They have to be associated with a particular human rights abuse or some grave social harm.” Salovey agreed with Macey’s view of the relationship between private and public investment, saying that there is a strong delineation between stateowned enterprises and private businesses. He further agreed that a company must be actively engaged in causing social injury to warrant divestment. Salovey also noted that Yale is not unique in investing in Chinese companies, pointing to both other university endowments and mutual funds that are invested in emerging markets. The investment, like any other foreign investment, comes with risk which the University is monitoring, he said. “We are watching social and political developments in China,” Salovey added. “We are certainly cognizant of relations between the U.S. and China. And particularly with any kind of foreign investment activity there’s geopolitical risk. And we have to assess that as part of whether it makes sense to be investing in other parts of the world.” Still, Asat argued that Yale should hold itself to a higher standard. “Regardless of the financial imperative to invest in Chinese market funds, Yale should abide by a basic moral standard,” Asat told the News. “That moral standard demands that even, and especially, when circumstances encourage and reward harmful investments, we must seek other solutions. There is always a choice, and Yale must make the right one based on its principles, even if it is not easy.” The University has grappled with similar issues in the past. In apartheid South Africa, the University divested from a company that was involved in producing identity cards that were used to segregate society, according to Salovey. The University also divested from an oil company operating in Sudan, where the government was determined to be comitting genocide in Darfur. In January 2021, the U.S. State Department labeled China’s repression of the Uyghur muslim population a ‘genocide.’
The worsening of relations between the U.S. and China have placed U.S. universities in a precarious position, as they aim to continue collaborative work with Chinese academics while remaining within the law. In December, nearly 100 Yale professors protested the U.S. government’s response to the worsening relations, denouncing the Department of Justice’s China Initiative as a threat to academic freedom and as discriminatory towards academics of Asian descent. In August 2020, the State Department urged university endowments to divest from Chinese holdings, pointing to the human rights abuses occurring in China and suggesting that certain firms may be delisted from stock exchanges. “The boards of your institution’s endowment funds have a moral obligation, and perhaps even a fiduciary duty, to ensure that your institution has clean investments and clean endowment funds,” Keith Krach, the former undersecretary of state for economic growth, energy and the environment, wrote in the August 2020 letter. Krach continued, saying that “consequently, the boards of U.S. university endowments would be prudent to divest from PRC [People’s Republic of China] firms’ stocks in the likely outcome that enhanced listing standards lead to a wholesale delisting of PRC firms from U.S. exchanges by the end of next year.” While Yale did not follow the State Department’s recommendations, Mendelsohn made clear that the University is continuously watching this issue. “We are monitoring social and political developments in China, including and especially U.S.China relations,” Mendelsohn wrote in an email to the News. “Geopolitical risk is necessarily a consideration in all foreign investment activity, and China is a top focus at the moment.” The ACIR determines grounds for divestment based on the principles outlined in the 1972 book “The Ethical Investor” written by Yale professor John Simon and former Yale professors Charles T. Powers and Jon P. Gunnemann. Contact PHILIP MOUSAVIZADEH at philip.mousavizadeh@yale.edu .
