Portfolio of Yihong Deng

Page 1

YIHONG D E N G PORTFOLIO


C on te n ts


04 Inside-Out Museum Interior project involved at OBRA Architects

16 Sanhe Elementary School project involved at OBRA Architects

24 GĂ–STA Serlachius Museum Extension project involved at OBRA Architects

32 IGS Hannover Public School project involved at OBRA Architects

40 Museum at WTC academic work at graduate school

52 School of Architecture academic work at undergraduate school

68 Renderings by Yihong Deng work at OBRA Architects

74 Photography by Yihong Deng personal work

86 Resume of Yihong Deng


4

I n s i de -O ut Muse u m Inter ior O B R A A rch i tects H ai di an , B e i j i ng C ompl ete d i n 2 0 1 2 Particapated in Concept Design, Schematic Design and responsible for Construction A d mi n i stra ti on


嵌入式壁灯

5600

2100

嵌入式壁灯

6300

16 T. @ 350

5600

18 T. @ 350

2100

16 T. @ 350

6300

18 T. @ 350

A8.1 22 +4.95 F.FL

UP

1

A8.1 32 +9.90 F.FL

3 A8.5

+2.61 F.FL

DN

+7.56 F.FL

DN

21 +4.95 F.FL

11 +0.00 F.FL

UP

GALLERY STAIRS PLAN 2ND FL 展厅楼梯平面二层 1:30

2

GALLERY STAIRS PLAN 3RD FL 展厅楼梯平面三层 1:30

Ø 300

Ø 300

738

4

+12.83 天花板 CEILING Ø 300 Ø 1500

Ø 300

Ø1780

4

Ø 2060

Ø 300

+9.90 前室三层 VESTIBULE 3RD FL

Ø 2330

4 Ø 300

+8.38 天花板 CEILING

+8.88 天花板 CEILING

Ø 2330

Ø 300

+7.56 休息平台2 LANDING 2

Ø 1500 Ø 300

Ø 1780 Ø 300

Ø 2060

Ø 300

+4.95 前室二层 VESTIBULE 2ND FL

Ø 2330

Ø 2330

+2.61 休息平台1 LANDING 1

2 A8.5

460 TYP.

+3.23 天花板 CEILING

+2.60 天花板 CEILING

典型踏步宽 350 TYP

1 A8.5

4

JUNE 14, 2012 2012年6月14日 REVISION 4 修改4

3

JUNE 11, 2012 2012年6月11日 REVISION 3 修改3

100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 100% 施工图

TYP.

EQ. EQ.

INSIDE-OUT ART MUSEUM 北京中间建筑美术馆

+0.00 前室一层 GALLERY GROUND

STAIRS DETAILS 楼梯细部 ISSUE 图纸版本

DATE 日期

100% CD 100% 施工图

MAY 29 , 2012 2012年5月29日

SCALE 出图比例

AS NOTED

OBRA ARCHITECTS 315 CHURCH STREET 4TH FLOOR NEW YORK NEW YORK 10013

3

GALLERY STAIRS SECTION 展厅楼梯剖面 1:30

TEL 212 625 3868 FAX 212 625 3874

ISSUED BY OBRA ARCHITECTS (DATE/SIGNATURE) 由奥布兰建筑设计事务所发布(日期 /签名)

INFO@OBRAARCHITECTS.COM

CONFIRMED BY CLIENT (DATE/SIGNATURE) 由甲方确认(日期 /签名)

奥布兰

WWW.OBRAARCHITECTS.COM

建筑设计咨询(北京)有限公司 CONFIRMED BY CONTRACTOR (DATE/SIGNATURE) 由施工方确认(日期 /签名)

北京市海淀区杏石口路65号 中间建筑艺术家工坊150 邮编:100195 电话:+86 10 6272 0489 WWW.OBRAARCHITECTS.COM

A8.1


The Inside-Out Museum, located on the foothills of Fra-

The interior was designed as a minimal intervention

grant Mountain to the west of Beijing was completed in

of efficient boxes of light where the art is shown. The

December 2012. Given that the structure was already

light is composed of indirect sources that are fixed and

designed by CADRG, the largest architectural conglom-

permanent, and direct ones that can be modified or re-

erate in China, the present project was limited to the

moved, a strategy that creates a ceiling that remains

design of its interiors. The museum specializes in the

as clean as possible of gadgets, tracks and sensors,

varied and unpredictable art of contemporary Chinese

providing a discrete and serene background for the art.

artists as well as a growing collection of American abstract work.


In all floors the indirect light comes from a continuous

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

cove surrounding the entire perimeter of every room

Walls and ceilings: Plaster

and creating a diffused and uniform halo of light that

Floors: Terrazzo

floats over the artworks like a benediction. The cove

Doors: Painted wood

creates also a permanent horizon for every room, a

Furniture: Polished wood

stabilizing datum that acts as unifying background to

Grills and registers: Enamel painted aluminum

the infinitely varied products of the artistic imagination.

Lighting: Combination of indirect fluorescent lighting and direct halogen and/or incandescent lighting

0 5 10

1:200 1:500

0

1

20

2

50

5

Sec ti on 1:200



1s t F l oor Gal l er y


10

L o bb y


11

Gal l er y D etai l


12

M ai n S ta i r


13

Cor r i dor /F oy er for C onfer enc e R oom


0 5 10 2 n d F l o o r R e fl ecte d C eiling Plan REVISION

1:200 1:500 1:600

0

1

01 2

20

50

2 5

5 10



16

San h e E l emen ta ry S chool O BR A A rchi tects L an g fa n g , H eb e i I n prog ress Involved in the whole process of Contracting, Concept Design, Schematic Design and Pr o j ect Man a g e men t T h e p roj ect i s no w on hold.



The project proposes an academic campus organized into three wings each to serve as the base of daily activities for children of three different age groups: 7 to 8, 9 to 10 and 11 to 12 years old. The wings include 16 classrooms each and are independent from each other with individual entrances that allow all children to come and go without mixing with other students from the other two age groups. 18 Two wings are located on the south edge of the site allowing them to enjoy abundant direct sunlight; the third one is located along the street to the west and, thanks to a specially-designed south-light roof, also enjoys abundant sunlight. All of the classrooms are organized in either one or two floors in order to facilitate the movement of the young students and preserve a carefully-calibrated overall sense of scale suitable to the size of small children. The classroom wings are each connected with one of the “monumental� buildings of common use becoming that way associated with their function and architecture. Wing of classrooms A for children of 7 and 8 years old connects to the cafeteria; wing B for 9 and 10 years-old lies adjacent to the gymnasium and wing C for 11 and 12 years-old bridges to the library. The different buildings defining this assembly are each conceived around a unique and distinctive architectural idea, providing the possibility for different experiences of space to the students and also becoming markers of recognition and orientation in the fabric of the school. The library’s reading room surrounds garden facing south, filled with light and planted with leafy trees, the garden can provide the students relief from reading allowing them to steal a glimpse of magpies on the wing. The gymnasium is sheltered by a gently curving ceiling that by deflecting natural light provides the appropriate conditions for playing sports and diffuses the contours of the large space making it seem smaller and more intimate. The cafeteria doubles as a gathering space and possible movie theater. The space is configured following foreshortened lines of film and slide projection, defining a space in the shape of a trumpet and naturally transiting between small and large by the funneling of the ceiling towards the entry.


M as s i ng M odel Study Sequenc e

19

Pr elim i nar y M odel of the Sc hool


re. d old 12

h al s f .

20 e

C orri do r ou tsi de th e S cience Classr oom s

HALLWAY OUTSIDE SCIENCE CLASSROOMS 科学教室外的走廊

ng.

g te s

ble

lly g of

建筑 每一个教室分支都联系着一个纪念式的普通用途的建筑,通过这种方式使它们之间 的功能与建筑产生关联。服务于7至8岁学生的教室分支A与餐厅相连,服务于9至 10岁学生的教室分支B与体育馆接壤, 而服务于11至12岁学生的教室分支C与图 书馆通过架桥联系。 这些不同的建筑每个都用一个唯一的且有特色的建筑设计理念构想出,为给学生产 生不同空间的感受提供了可能,并且同时成为了学校肌理的识别和方向的地标。 图书馆的阅览室将朝南的庭院包围着,庭院充满着阳光且其中种植着常青树,庭院 可以减轻学生阅读时的压力,让他们可以不经意间瞥到飞行中的喜鹊。

s

cial ary

n the d e

体育馆掩蔽在微弯曲的屋顶下,偏转的日光为体育运动提供了合适的条件,并且扩 散到大空间的轮廓使其显得更小也更加私密 餐厅同时也是聚集处与可能的电影院。空间是根据电影与幻灯片放映时的透视线配 置的,将空间定义为一个喇叭的形状并且将屋顶从入口处弯曲成漏斗状使空间自然 的从小转变到大, 学校的服务设施包括科学与艺术特殊教室。它们被设置在不同的建筑中并在某一点 相交。科学特殊教室被设置在围绕着图书馆庭院的半圆上,而艺术特殊教室设置在 一个方形的包含有一个养有大型金鲤鱼的庭院池塘的设计中,在这两个特殊教室建 筑中光线引导着学生在大厅中过往。在一天中,科学教室里有一条持续的面向西南 的天窗,光线穿过它在双层长廊的弧形墙上投下一条变化的光带,而在艺术馆中通 过屋顶到室内的光线则会从庭院池塘中反射到南面。

S ci en ce C l a ssroo m Layout

SCIENCE CLASSROOM 科学教室


h ges dom

to d

体本身的感受。因为这些建筑遮断了相互间 完整的视角,在不断的遮掩和揭示中,学校 成为一个不能够一眼看穿而需要不断地在校 园中漫步来收集并集合连续的影像才能够理 解的空间。学校被暗喻为一个文明的知识本 身,是一种不能够通过复制或记诵而被瞬间 获得的,而是只能够通过时间与努力用有创 意的调查才能取得的。

MODEL, CLASSROOM WING 1 模型,组团一教室

e

t d

ion

t

ile

y , but ve

W i ng C

21

TYPICAL CLASSROOM

Typi c al C l as s r oom Lay out 典型教室 i n W i ng C




24

G ÖS T A S e rl a ch i us Museum Extension O BR A A rchi tects M än ttä , F i n l an d C ompe ti ti o n E n try I n vol ved i n th e w ho l e pr ocess of the com petition. R esp o n si bl e fo r the d i agr am m tic pr esentation and r ender ing c oor di nati on of the pr oej c t.



14 13

10

6 3

4 26 11

5

7

0 5 10

0

1

01 2

20

50

2 5

5 10

1 VISITOR DROP OFF 01 2 5 10 2 PARKING 3 MANOR 4 ENTRY TERRACE 5 MUSEUM ADDITION 6 HANDICAP DROP OFF 7 FORMAL GARDEN 8 TAVENTISAARI BRIDGE 9 SWIMMER’S PIER, SITE OF POSSIBLE FUTURE SAUNA & CAFE

10 LOADING 11 FOREST 12 CHIAROSCURO LANDSCAPE 13 SCULPTURE COURT 14 BENCH 15 OLD PATH 16 SCULPTURE


2

1

27 12

8

15

16

9


This project contemplates the Gösta Serlachius Museum’s expansion from an intimate personal collection to an institution of international distinction. The existing Joenniemi Manor projects the comfort of the quotidian with empathetic humanity. This quality has a palpable presence that must be preserved to do justice to the Museum’s cultural roots. Visitors approach through a new ceremonial walk through a field of trees, subliminally cleansing the consciousness before exposing it to art. The walk ends on an entry terrace at the top of the 1935 Paul Olsson garden, thus weaving old and new into the new first impression. 28 To develop dependency between the Manor and the addition, the new building’s form derives from conceptually projecting one of the Manor’s rear windows. The exterior is clad with glass and brushed chromium steel panels, a chameleon-like material that reflects the surrounding atmosphere, developing optical co-dependency with the existing architecture without forgery or imitation. The building contains three galleries in continuous spatial sequence, defined in simple planes bathed in zenithal light. The building is ruled by a foreshortened geometry and gently punctuated by circular skylights in the frosted glass ceiling. Depending on which direction one moves, the exaggerated depth or flatness suggests the impression of time accelerated or slowed down; the reciprocal canceling out of these two illusions creates a momentary sense of temporal stasis for the contemplation of beauty.

A R T -PROTECTED AND INTROSPECTIVE MANOR

P U B LIC -PERMEABLE AND INVITING S E R V IC E -DISCRETE AND CONVENIENT


0 5 10

1:200 1:500 1:600

0

20

1

2

01 2 01 2

50

5

5 5

10 10

Eas t El ev ati on

CHROMIUM STEEL GALLERY ENCLOSURE

29

ULTRA CLEAR GLASS ENCLOSURE

SEMI-EXCAVATED PUBLIC AREAS


30

M u s e u m P e d a g o g y F aci l i ti e s F oyer


2

2 +14.89

3 +15.19

6

7

4 +14.43

5

4 +10.39

0 5 10

8 +7.39

11

12 +3.09

1:200 1:500 1:600

0

20

1

50

2

5

01 2

Sec 5 ti on

01 2

5

10

10

ORTH LIGHT IN CONSERVATION WORKSHOP

31

N or th Li ght i n C ons er v ati on W or k s hop


32

I GS H a n n o ve r P ub l i c School O BR A A rchi tects H an n o ve r, G erma n y I n vi te d C ompe ti ti o n E ntr y R esp o n si bl e fo r the d i agr am m atic pr esentation of the pr oject



T y p i c a l C o r e o f a C l u ste r: H a n g i n g G a r d e n + Le a rni ng L a n dscape

Elevated M ainso nettes

34

T he scho o l i s o rga n i zed ar ound a squar e cour tyar d and a quar ter - c i r c l e c our ty ar d. W ater el e m en ts “i nd e n t” th e bu ilding, which steps fr om the r oof to the c our ty ar ds i n a s er i es of gar den t e r ra ce s th a t a l so b ri n g light and air into the building. The two top fl oor s of the c hi l dr en’ s c l as s r o oms fo rm a prote cted r ecess space wher e the childr en can s ur v ey the c i ty ’ s hor i z on and i ts c o n ti nu i ng d e ve l op ment. E a ch cl assroo m i s o rganized ar ound a double cube: an inter i or “ l ear ni ng l ands c ape” and an e x te ri o r “h a n g i ng g a rden.” The M aisonette classr oom ar r angem ent offer s 1) s pac e effi c i enc y , d u e to ve rti ca l ci rcul ation in the cour tyar d’s cor ner s; 2) gr id- o r gani z ed c l as s r oom s that fl ex i bl y c o mbi ne ; 3) fa mi l y-l i ke cohesiveness due to the spaces’ closen es s ; and 4) s ens e of i denti ty fr om e a ch cl a ssroo m’ s un i que position, so childr en identify with th ei r M ai s onettes as they adv anc e t h r ou g h sch o o l . T hi s d e si gn pu rsue s both ener gy efficiency and natur al lighting by i nc l udi ng a c om pos i te w al l on t h e so u th a n d e a st e l evations. M ade of u- glass, tr anslucent ins ul ati on and fi ber gl as s - r ei nfor c ed c o n crete , th e w al l ca p tur es ener gy in the concr ete’s ther m al m as s w hi l e w al l per for ati ons al l ow n a tural l i g h ti ng . T h rou gh this wall, the quiet pr esence of a tr ee and a l i ght c i r c l e i n eac h l ear ni ng l a nd sca p e , L E D pa n e l s displaying the building’s r eal- tim e ener gy s av i ngs and the ener gy l ab’ s p r omi n e n t po si ti o n i n the entr y lobby, the school’s design im p l i c i tl y teac hes the i m por tanc e of i n te l l i ge n t e n e rgy man agem ent to our futur e gener ations.


t h e C o n n e c t i o n of tw o C l u ste rs a n d th e i r A c c e s s

Clus ter s

35

L IG HT AN D ENERGY Th e I G S M ü lhenbur g pr oject constitutes a good opportunity t o ad va nc e the tenets of passivhaus towards the construction o f t h e mo st beautiful school in the worl d. Due to the poor U -va lue pe rf or mance of glazed sur faces, an increase in lighta dmit t in g s u rfaces implies an incr ease i n the thi ckness of the w a lls a nd th e consequential loss of effi ci ency. It woul d seem t h at , s imp listically, we would have to choose between energeti c p erfo rma nc e and light. This would be bad for any building, but

LICHT UND ENERGIE Das Projekt IGS Mühlenberg bietet die Möglichkeit, die Zukunft des Passivhaus Standards mit dem Bau einer der faszi ni erendsten Schule der Welt zu verbinden. Durch die Anforderungen des Passivhaus Standards scheint man di e Wahl zwischen energetischer Leistungsfähigkeit und Licht zu haben. Auf eines von beiden zu verzichten wäre schlecht für jedes Gebäude, aber es ist besonders kritisch in Schulgebäuden, wo die Schüler nach Formen der Erleuchtung


G r ou n d F l o o r P l a n 36

S e co n d F l o o r P l a n


LIBRARY

GYM

CULTURE CENTER

C ul tur e Attr ac tor s

37 CAFE RECESS COURTYARD

ART STUDIO SCULPTURE GARDEN

LIBRARY READING GARDEN

LEARNING LANDSCAPE HANGING GARDEN

CULTURE CENTER AMPHI-THEATER

Open Spac e Qual i ti es


38

a Efficiency Each side of the square courtyard is occupied by two maisonettes, each can be reached from vertical circulation placed in the corner, avoiding the need for wide corridors at the top floors and preserving space for the classrooms themselves. b Flexibility The classrooms are organized in an 8.10 meter grid defining the required 64 m2 spaces. Every cluster maisonette includes at least one pair of classrooms that can be combined into a larger one by operating a removable partition. c Cohesiveness Organized in two levels the clusters occupy less horizontal space, propitiating a cohesive inhabitation more akin to the domestic rather than the institutional. d Deliberate intent The “learning landscape” and “hanging garden” are clearly not leftover spaces but the intentional center of the arrangement. They are clear as “void” containers for children’s imaginations to fulfill, perfect cubes in light crisscrossed by the diagonal movement of young bodies in motion. e Identity Although each maisonette learning cluster has been defined with the same desig n ingredients, they are all, by virtue of position and combinatory transposition, different. This allows children to identify T hi rd F l o o r P l a nwith their cluster and also to experience a coherent progression of their experience in the school as advance 50 0 5they 10 20 through the grades.

L e arni ng L a n d sca p e

a Effizien In jeder E Erschließ dient, die b Flexibil Die Klass entsprech Jede Lern einem grö c Gruppe Die Lerne kein insti Gefühl. d Identitä Auch wen entworfen die unters Das ermö identifizie erforsche e Leitged Die Lernl nicht als Zentrum d offen, um perfekten


die abgehobenen Maisonette

die Verbindung zweier Cluster und die vertikale Erschliessung

die Cluster

E L E VAT E D M A I S O N E T T E S DIE A B G E H O B E N E N M A I S O N E T T E

T H E C O N N E C T I O N O F T WO C L U S T E R S A N D T H E I R A C C E S S D I E V E R B I N D U N G Z W E I E R C L U S T E R U N D V E RT I K A L E E R S C H L I E S S U N G

CLUSTERS CLUSTER

Pr i v ate Students R es or t C our ty ar d Open Entr y Pl az a bes i des the M ar k et 39

M A I S O N E T T E O F L E A R N I N G - C O U RT YA R D MAISONETTE DES LERNES - HOF

H angi ng Gar den


40

M use u m + R esi de n ti al Tower at W TC Adva n ce d A rchi tectu re Studio, GSAPP, Colum bia Univer sity St ud i o C ri ti c: Jo sh u a Pr ince- Ram us Partne r: C o sta n d i s K i zis



In January 2009, a cash-strapped Port Authority of

to the location, how to bring them into the building? In-

New York and New Jersey proposed erecting 2-6 story

stead of putting the museum on the street level, where

temporary low-rise retail pedestals on the WTC site for

there are already a handful of attractions, the museum

placeholders for WTC Towers 2 and 3. As lower Man-

is elevated to a quieter background of towers.

hattan is becoming increasingly residential, this offers

42

the opportunity to bring residents and cultural institu-

Within the building envelope, with a reasonable depth

tions to the area. So the studio challenges the students

for the housing, we design a housing tower of 40m by

to use the Port Authority’s proposed “stumps� to com-

40m. While the footprint for the museum is maximized,

plete either Tower 2 or 3 as a mixed-use building com-

60m by 60m, to allow for easy circulation. Now the mu-

bining apartments with an art museum given a real art

seum stands out even more because of its cantilevered

collection (the Kunsthaus Zurich extension).

volume.

The audience for this art museum will be not only the

A truss system is designed to bring the load of the resi-

local residents but also a large amount of visitors as the

dential tower to the periphery of the museum and then

9/11 Memorial Site is expected to be visited by 6.6 mil-

back to the regular structure system of the residential

lion people per year. Now they are already very closed

tower again.


One contradictory fact about any art museum is the

good relationship to the time they have. That is to say,

abundance of the collection versus the limit time that

if one only have an hour, he or she should not spend

each visitor has. Can we build a museum to address

most of the time walking and looking for things.

this issue of time? After an extensive exploration of spacial typologies which could allow us to improve the ex-

So in the final scheme, the galleries are broken into

perience, especially of those short visits, we came out a

very small scale, not only allowing for a more intimate

few criteria to guide the final design. First, we don’t want

viewing experience of artworks, but also providing more

to provide one particular shortcut to visit the museum,

variations of the space that the visitors are actually

in the contrary, we prefer to have a system ready for

visiting. As the smaller gallery scheme multiples the

the visitors to curate their own visits based on the time

wall surfaces, thus more entrances and exists can be

that they have. Second, any design decisions would be

provided. The porosity of the galleries allows for more

guided by the same intention, that is to allow the visitors

variations of itineraries.

to experience the right amount of distance, volume in a

M atr i x of pos s i bl i ti es for v i s i tor s w i th a gi v en am ount of ti m e 1 5 mi n u te s

30 m inutes

1 hour

2 hour

43


1:200

1:500

1:600

0 5 10

20

50

- 2 Ex h i bi ti o n L e ve l P o s t 1 960 C ol l e cti on 0 1 2 01 2 01 2

5 5

5 10

10


0 5 10

20

50

+1 Ex hi bi ti on Lev el The Buhrl e C ol l ec ti on & 19th C entur y C ol l ec ti on 0 1 2

1:200 1:500 1:600

01 2 01 2

5 5

10 10

5


8

2

2

2

1

3

4

4

4

4

4

5

6

7

7

7

0 5 10

1:200

0

1:500 Sec ti on 1:600

1

01 2

20

50

2 5

5 10

1

MUSEUM LOBBY

2

BUHRLE 0 COLLECTION GALLERIES 12 5 10

3 4

CAFE

5

AUDITORIUM

6

STORAGE

7

EQUIPMENT

8

APARTMENT SKY LOBBY

POST 1960 COLLECTION GALLERIES



P o s t 1 9 6 0 Col l e cti on Ga l l e ri e s


M us eum Lobby Lev el w i th T he Buhr l e C ol l ec ti on & 19th C entur y C ol l ec ti on abov e


mu se u m i n t h e ci ty li k e a l a n t e r n i n th e sky f ro m n o w o n d o w n t o w n m a n ha tta n i s no t d e a d a t night b u t a p l a c e t o l ive t h e man i f e s t o o f h e i gh t w o u ld b e r e p l a c e d b y t h e st o r y o f l i f e

50


51


52

Scho o l of A rchi tectu re Ar ch i tectu re D esi gn S tudio, School of Ar chitectur e, Tsinghua U ni v er s i ty St ud i o C ri ti c: H ua n Z ou



A linkage to connect the two levels of campus would also bring people into the School of Architecture

+2.40

+0.00 The linkage is designed as a stepping public plaza with all the public accessible program and the Studio locating by the side of it

A courtyard is added to allow more space to have natural lighting and ventilation. This courtyard, along with public plaza, divide the building into three wings.

54

Circulation space is placed along the public plaza to allow easy circulation, while in the north wing, circulation is placed at the north side so that the rooms could have south lighting.

N


The mission of this studio is to build an imaginary new building for the School of Architecture in Tsinghua University. First, the opportunity lies in that the new site would be located in the heart of the teaching area on the campus. This, different from the current site, would allow more interdisciplinary communication and discussion. As there is level difference between the east and the west side of the site, connecting a main road to a secondary road on the upper level, a public plaza is created. This makes the public plaza into part of the circulation of the school and a public living room with access and view to the public programs shared by all people on campus as well as to the studio, where the most amazing creation, teaching and learning happen. Secondly, the site of the school is quite big and also long at the north-south direction. Thus, in order to allow more space to have natural lighting and ventilation, a courtyard is created. This then, along with the public plaza, divides the building into 3 wings, the teaching wing with the teachers’ offices and the classrooms, the public wing with auditorium, library and critic/exhibition space and the studio wing. This division allows independency of the operation, as well as the independency of the structure and spatial configuration of the three wings. For instance, as both the studio and the public space has a need for longer span, these two parts are proposed with steel structure. The studio has a stepped section which makes the whole space continuous as one, allowing communication between different grades,and the public wing is staggering of rooms with different sections. In the meanwhile, the teaching wing with regluar sized rooms would be built as a concrete shear wall system, which is more economic. Last but not least, in order for the building to still perform as a whole and for people to be able to move between the different wings easily, more than one connection is planned. In the private courtyard, these connections become barriers of noise from the roads, while in the public plaza, the connections are elevated or buried to enable people to pass through without entering the building.

55


-1.20 Connections make the circulation between different wings easier.

10

10 Three wings have different sectional configuration.

10

Program diagram:

Teaching Wing: Blue

Public Wing: Red

Studio Wing: Yellow

10 56

The independence of the three wings allows easy after-hours operation and access control for the studio

8

9

1 MAIN ENTRANCE 2 LOBBY 3 MODEL SHOP 4 AUDITORIUM ENTRANCE 5 AUDITORIUM 6 LOUNGE 7 CAFÉ 8 KITCHEN 9 ADMINISTRATION ENTRANCE 10 ADMINISTRATION 11 GARDEN 12 PUBLIC PLAZA 13 STUDIO ENTRANCE 14 STUDIO 15 TEACHER’S OFFICE 16 CLASSROOM 17 LIBRARY

16

15


5

4 +1.20

6 14

-1.20

+1.20

3

11

2 +0.00

14

1 12 +0.00

57 14

50

7

13

0 5 10

20

0 Entr 1 y Lev 2 el Pl an +1.60

1:500

01 2

5

01 2

5

1:600

1:500

1:200

1:600

5

10 10

14

17

0 5 10 7

50

01 2

01 2

0

1:200

1

0 5 10

5

5

2

20

10

10

-1.20

5

-1.20

1:600

50

14

1:200 1:500

20

0 Sec ti on

1

01 2

2 5

5 10


Different Section Configuration of Different Wings

Teaching Wing: Stacking of regular sized rooms

58

Garden: Private to the building and separated from the road by the Cafe and level difference

Public Wing: Staggering of different program ent sections


mmatic space with differ-

Studio Wing: Stepped section allowing communication between different years

59

Public Plaza: Stepped and continuous, connecting two levels with the bridge elevated and passage buried


+1.80 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

1

2 +1.20

3 60

+3.60

+0.00

+3.60

5

0 5 10

1:200 1:500 1:600

01 2

5

20

50

1 Le 2 + 4 . 1 0 0E n try ve l P l a n 5

5 10

+1.20

5


+6.30

7

7

7

7

7

6 3 61

+7.20

+4.80

+3.60

5

+6.00

5

5

0 5 10

1:200 1 FOYER 2 AUDITORIUM 3 LIBRARY 4 TEACHER’S OFFICE

5 STUDIO 6 CRITIC & EXHIBITION SPACE 7 CLASSROOM

1:500 1:600

20

50

0 Entr 1 y Lev 2 el Pl an +7.60 01 2

5

10

5


1

Library with double height reading room towards the north and exterior seatings on balcony towards the south

2

62

1

Critic/Exhibiton Space with North-facing Clerestory


3

Auditorium with stepped floor and channel glass to filter the direct lighting

63

2

3


64


65

View of the Public Plaza from the lower level


66


67

View of the Courtyard from the higher level


68

R en d e ri n g s b y Y i ho n g Deng W ork at OB R A A rch i tects



K a o s h i u n g Ma ri ti me C ul ture & Pop M usic Center Com petition M a r i n e C u l tu re E xh i bi t C e n te r Inter ior ( Top) O u t d o o r Performa n ce C en te r (Bottom )


Yun Lounge - Yunnan Restaur ant i n Bei j i ng Inter i or R enov ati on Pr opos al Inter i or ( T op) Outdoor T er r ac e w i th pr opos ed T ents ( Bottom )


I G S H a n n o ver P ub l i c S ch o o l Gym (Top) M a i n C o u r t yard D ayti me V i ew (Bottom Left) / Nighttim e View ( Bottom Ri ght)


Lenovo Qianm en Fla gs hi p Stor e Inter i or R enov ati on Pr opos al Sal es Ar ea on Gr ound F l oor ( T op) Un l i m i ted Lounge on Sec ond F l oor ( Bottom )


74

Pho to g rap h y b y Y i ho n g Deng

Ar chitectur e and Cityscape



76


77


78


79


80


81


82


83


84


85


Y I H O N G D E N G LEED Green Associate

mail@yihongdeng.com www.yihongdeng.com +86 189 1100 0224

EXPERIENCE: OBRA A r chit ect s, B eijing Junior A r chit ect

Construction Administration: Inside-Out Museum Interior Renovation Concept Design: Sanhe Kindergarten, Tongji University Subway Station, Lenovo Flagship Store, Art -site Development in Gyeonggi-do, South Korea + As the only Chinese speaking architect in the office, in charge of coordination/communication with clients, local consultants, contractors and suppliers as well as building code research and product specification research. + Responsible for construction administration tasks including site visiting, issuing revision drawings based on the site visits, daily meetings with contractor and client, working closely with specialized consultants on designing for security system, fire protection system, lighting as well as audio system. + Assist in HR, participated in the interviews and orientation of new staff and intern OBRA A r chit ect s, N ew Y or k Intern A r chit ect

86

Be ijin g , C h in a Ma y 2 0 1 2 - J u n e 2 0 1 3

N e w Yo rk , N Y J u n e 2 0 1 0 - Ap ril 2 0 1 2

Concept Design+Competition: Kaoshiung Maritime Culture & Pop Music Center, IGS Hannover Public School, Qidou Residential Masterplan in Wenzhou, Freize Art Fair Proposal, GĂ–STA Serlachius Museum Extension, Temple of Heaven Hotel Garden + Roof Pavilion, Yun Lounge Restaurant Interior Renovation, Apartment Building in San Juan Contracting, Concept Design and Schematic Design: Sanhe Elementary School Construction Documents: Casa para un viĂąatero in San Juan, Argentina + In charge of rendering and diagrammatic presentation for international competitions. + Responsible for preparing presentation and deliverable for all the Chinese projects. + Assist in Project Management of various projects and involve in office management. Team M inus S t udio Be ijin g , C h in a Intern Se p te mb e r 2 0 0 8 - Ma y 2 0 0 9 Schematic Design: Roof Garden design of China Pavilion, 2010 Shanghai Expo and Hefeng Plaza for Creative Industry, Ningbo, Zhejiang. Both of the projects have been realized now. China A r chit ect ur e D esign and R esear ch G r oup Intern ( R esident ial D esign Team )

Be ijin g , C h in a Ma y 2 0 0 8 - Au g u s t 2 0 0 8

EDUCATIO N: Columbia U niver sit y, G S A P P Master of S cience in A dvanced A r chit ect ur al D e s ig n

N e w Yo rk , N Y Ma y 2 0 1 0

T sing hua U niver sit y, S chool of A r chit ect ur e Bachelor of A r chit ect ur e

Be ijin g , C h in a June 2009

L ANG UAG ES: Fluent in M andar in and E nglish, B eginner level in Ge rma n

SKILLS: 3ds M ax, R hinocer os+ V - R ay, A ut oC A D , G oogle Sk e tc h U p , Gra s s h o p p e r Adob e I llust r at or , P hot oshop, I nD esign, Flash, D re a mw e a v e r a n d Afte r Effe c ts




Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.