Mervinskiy 406

Page 197

197 grounds must be rejected and that FBI has not established any basis for impugning the DPC’s decision or the PDD or the procedures for the inquiry adopted by the DPC. (3)

I have considered and rejected FBI’s allegation that the DPC was in breach of its duty of candour in the manner in which it defended these proceedings. I have, however, concluded that the DPC ought to have answered a number of the questions raised on behalf of FBI in correspondence sent on 29th October, 2020 which was responded to on behalf of the DPC on 5th November, 2020.

(4)

I have considered the allegation of abuse of process and improper purpose made by the DPC but withdrawn in the course of the hearing. I have concluded that there is and was no basis for the allegation, that it ought not to have been made and that, having been made, it ought to have been withdrawn much sooner than it was.

(5)

For the reasons set out in this judgment, I refuse all of the reliefs sought by FBI and dismiss the claims made by it in the proceedings.

431.

I will list the proceedings for mention shortly after I have circulated this judgment to

the parties. I will then hear from counsel on any issues arising from the judgment and on the final orders to be made, including costs. If necessary, I will give further directions for any further hearings which may be necessary to deal with those issues. 432.

Finally, I would like to record my thanks and appreciation to the counsel and

solicitors acting for FBI, the DPC and Mr. Schrems for their cooperation in ensuring an expeditious hearing of the proceedings and for their clear, concise and extremely helpful submissions on the numerous difficult legal issues which were required to be determined in the proceedings.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice David Barniville delivered on the 14th day of May Index

1min
page 197

24.Abuse of Process/Improper Purpose

7min
pages 192-195

25.Summary of Conclusions

1min
page 196

22.Adequacy of DPC’s Reasons

5min
pages 181-183

23.Duty of Candour

14min
pages 184-191

21.Alleged Disproportionality of Simultaneous Inquiries

1min
page 180

20.Alleged Discrimination/Breach of FBI’s Right to Equality: Inquiry into FBI Only

23min
pages 167-179

17.Alleged Breach of Fair Procedures: Involvement of Commissioner at Investigation and Decision Making Stages

10min
pages 151-156

16.Alleged Breach of Fair Procedures: Premature Judgment

34min
pages 132-150

15.Alleged Breach of Fair Procedures: 21 Day Period for Submissions

31min
pages 114-131

Expectation

59min
pages 80-113

Decision

19min
pages 69-79

12.Whether PDD/DPC’s Procedure is Amenable to Judicial Review

28min
pages 53-68

11.Structure for Consideration of the Issues Raised

2min
pages 51-52

10.Resolution of Mr. Schrems Proceedings

3min
pages 49-50

Correspondence Post the DPC’s 28 August 2020 Letter and PDD8

19min
pages 35-45

9. Procedural Background

5min
pages 46-48

DPC’s 28 August 2020 Letter and PDD7

22min
pages 22-34

6. Developments Post Judgment in Schrems II

2min
pages 17-18

Relevant Factual Background…………………………………………………4

8min
pages 8-12

Failure to Await Guidance from EDPB and/or Failure to Take Timing of EDPB

5min
pages 19-21

Introduction

5min
pages 3-5

Structure of Judgment………………………………………………………..…….. 3

1min
page 7
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Mervinskiy 406 by Олексій Мервінський - Issuu