Mervinskiy 497

Page 106

Guide on Article 8 of the Convention – Right to respect for private and family life

5. Home visits, searches and seizures 60 459. In order to secure physical evidence on certain offences, the domestic authorities may consider it necessary to implement measures which entail entering a private home (Dragan Petrović v. Serbia, § 74). The actions of the police when entering homes must be “lawful” (Bostan v. the Republic of Moldova, §§ 21-30) and proportionate to the aim pursued (McLeod v. the United Kingdom, §§ 53-57, in which a violation was found; for an example of a case in which no violation was found, see Dragan Petrović v. Serbia, §§ 75-77), as must any action taken inside the individual home (Vasylchuk v. Ukraine, § 83, concerning the ransacking of private premises). 460. The judgment in the case of National Federation of Sportspersons’ Associations and Unions (FNASS) and Others v. France concerned the obligation imposed on high-level athletes falling within a “target group” to give advance notification of their whereabouts so that unannounced anti-doping tests could be carried out. The Court emphasised that home visits for the purposes of such testing were very different from those carried out under court supervision, which were geared to investigating offences or seizing items of property. Such searches, by definition, struck at the heart of respect for the home and could not be treated as equivalent to the visits to the athletes’ homes (§ 186). The Court considered that reducing or cancelling the obligations of which the applicant had complained could increase the dangers of doping to their health and to that of the whole sporting community, and would run counter to the European and international consensus on the need to carry out unannounced tests (§ 190). 461. Citizens must be protected from the risk of undue police intrusions into their homes. The Court found a violation of Article 8 where members of a special intervention unit wearing balaclavas and armed with machine guns had entered a private home at daybreak in order to serve charges on the applicant and escort him to the police station. The Court pointed out that that safeguards should be in place in order to avoid any possible abuse and protect human dignity in such circumstances (Kučera v. Slovakia, §§ 119 and 122; see also Rachwalski and Ferenc v. Poland, § 73). Those safeguards might even include requiring the State to conduct an effective investigation if that is the only legal means of shedding light on allegations of unlawful searches of property (H.M. v. Turkey, §§ 2627 and 29: violation of the procedural limb of Article 8 owing to the inadequacy of the investigation; regarding the importance of such procedural protection, see Vasylchuk v. Ukraine, § 84). 462. Measures involving entering private homes must be “in accordance with the law”, which entails compliance with legal procedure (L.M. v. Italy, §§ 29 and 31) and with the existing safeguards (Panteleyenko v. Ukraine, §§ 50-51; Kilyen v. Romania, § 34), must pursue one of the legitimate aims listed in Article 8 § 2 (Smirnov v. Russia, § 40), and must be “necessary in a democratic society” to achieve that aim (Camenzind v. Switzerland, § 47). 463. The following are examples of measures which pursue legitimate aims: action by the Competition Authority to protect economic competition (DELTA PEKÁRNY a.s. v. the Czech Republic, § 81); suppression of tax evasion (Keslassy v. France (dec.), and K.S. and M.S. v. Germany, § 48); seeking circumstantial and material evidence in criminal cases, for example involving forgery, breach of trust and the issuing of uncovered cheques (Van Rossem v. Belgium, § 40), murder (Dragan Petrović v. Serbia, § 74), drug trafficking (Işıldak v. Turkey, § 50) and illegal trade in medicines (Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, § 55); environmental protection and prevention of nuisance (Halabi v. France, §§ 60-61); and protecting health and the “rights and freedoms of others” in the 60

See also the Guide on Data protection.

European Court of Human Rights

106/161

Last update: 31.08.2021


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

List of cited cases

50min
pages 140-161

D. Correspondence of private individuals, professionals and companies

2min
page 130

6. Correspondence with the Court

5min
pages 123-124

5. Correspondence between prisoners and their lawyer

3min
page 122

4. Telephone conversations

3min
page 121

E. Surveillance of telecommunications in a criminal context

9min
pages 131-133

2. Bulk interception regimes

4min
pages 138-139

C. Lawyers’ correspondence

10min
pages 127-129

2. Positive obligations

2min
page 116

3. Pollutant and potentially dangerous activities

2min
page 114

2. Noise disturbance, problems with neighbours and other nuisances

3min
page 113

E. Journalists’ homes

3min
page 110

C. Commercial premises

2min
page 108

D. Law firms

3min
page 109

5. Home visits, searches and seizures

7min
pages 106-107

2. Tenants

3min
page 103

1. Property owners

3min
page 102

2. Examples of “interference”

6min
pages 99-100

6. Material interests

2min
page 96

7. Testimonial privilege

2min
page 97

5. Immigration and expulsion

16min
pages 91-95

3. Children

39min
pages 77-87

4. Other family relationships

10min
pages 88-90

2. Parents

3min
page 76

B. Procedural obligation

3min
page 72

9. Statelessness, citizenship and residence

3min
page 68

7. Gender identity

7min
pages 64-65

3. Legal parent-child relationship

3min
page 62

2. Right to discover one’s origins

3min
page 61

10. Deportation and expulsion decisions

3min
page 69

11. Marital and parental status

2min
page 70

8. Right to ethnic identity

6min
pages 66-67

11. Privacy during detention and imprisonment

3min
page 59

9. Home visits, searches and seizures

3min
page 57

10. Lawyer-client relationship

3min
page 58

8. Stop and search police powers

3min
page 56

6. File or data gathering by security services or other organs of the State

6min
pages 53-54

5. Information about one’s health

3min
page 52

2. Protection of individual reputation; defamation

14min
pages 47-50

7. Police surveillance

3min
page 55

1. Right to one’s image and photographs; the publishing of photos, images, and articles

7min
pages 45-46

9. Environmental issues

3min
page 42

C. Privacy

3min
page 44

10. Sexual orientation and sexual life

3min
page 43

5. Health care and treatment

6min
pages 37-38

4. Mental illness/mesure of protection

7min
pages 35-36

8. Issues concerning burial and deceased persons

7min
pages 40-41

3. Forced medical treatment and compulsory medical procedures

3min
page 34

1. Private and family life

19min
pages 14-19

C. In the case of a negative obligation, was the interference conducted “in accordance with the law”?

7min
pages 10-11

2. Reproductive rights

6min
pages 32-33

B. Should the case be assessed from the perspective of a negative or positive obligation?

7min
pages 8-9

Note to readers

2min
page 6

2. Home and correspondence

8min
pages 20-22

2. Professional and business activities

13min
pages 26-29

D. Does the interference further a legitimate aim?

3min
page 12
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.