Mervinskiy 497

Page 52

Guide on Article 8 of the Convention – Right to respect for private and family life

Court has also held that the interests of national security and the fight against terrorism prevail over the applicants’ interest in having access to information about them in the Security Police files (Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, § 91) 33. While the Court has recognised that, particularly in proceedings related to the operations of state security agencies, there may be legitimate grounds to limit access to certain documents and other materials, it has found this consideration loses much of its validity with respect to lustration proceedings (Turek v. Slovakia, § 115). 205. The law must provide an effective and accessible procedure enabling applicants to have access to any important information concerning them (Yonchev v. Bulgaria, §§ 49-53). In this particular case, the applicant, a police officer, had applied for a position in an international mission, but following two psychological assessments, had been declared unfit for the position in question. He complained that he had been refused access to his personnel file at the Ministry of the Interior, and in particular the assessments, on the grounds that certain documents were classified.

5. Information about one’s health 34 206. Respecting the confidentiality of health data is a vital principle in the legal systems of all the Contracting Parties to the Convention (L.L. v. France, §§ 445-45 in the context of divorce proceedings). It is crucial not only to respect the privacy of a patient, but also to preserve his or her confidence in the medical profession and in the health services in general. Without such protection, those in need of medical assistance may be deterred from revealing such information of a personal and intimate nature as may be necessary in order to receive appropriate treatment and, even, from seeking such assistance. They may thereby endanger their own health and, in the case of communicable diseases, that of the community. The domestic law must therefore afford appropriate safeguards to prevent any such communication or disclosure of personal health data as may be inconsistent with the guarantees in Article 8 of the Convention (Z v. Finland, § 95; Mockutė v. Lithuania, §§ 93-94; Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, § 83). 207. The right to privacy and other considerations also apply particularly when it comes to protecting the confidentiality of information relating to HIV, as the disclosure of such information can have devastating consequences for the private and family life of the individual and his or her social and professional situation, including exposure to stigma and possible exclusion (Z v. Finland, § 96; C.C. v. Spain, § 33; Y v. Turkey (dec.), § 68). The interest in protecting the confidentiality of such information will therefore weigh heavily in the balance in determining whether the interference was proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued. Such interference cannot be compatible with Article 8 unless it is justified by an overriding requirement in the public interest (Z v. Finland, § 96; Y v. Turkey (dec.), § 78), in the interest of the applicant himself or in the interest of the safety of hospital staff (ibid., § 77-78). The unnecessary disclosure of sensitive medical data in a certificate, which has to be produced in various situations such as obtaining a driving licence and applying for a job, is disproportionate to any possible legitimate aim (P.T. v. the Republic of Moldova, §§ 31-32). Similarly, the disclosure by State hospitals of Jehovah’s Witnesses’ medical files to the prosecutor’s office following their refusal of a blood transfusion constituted a disproportionate interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their private life in breach of Article 8 (Avilkina and Others v. Russia, § 54). However, the publication of an article on the mental health status of a psychological expert did not vio-

33 34

See the Guide on Terrorism. See also the Guide on Data protection.

European Court of Human Rights

52/161

Last update: 31.08.2021


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

List of cited cases

50min
pages 140-161

D. Correspondence of private individuals, professionals and companies

2min
page 130

6. Correspondence with the Court

5min
pages 123-124

5. Correspondence between prisoners and their lawyer

3min
page 122

4. Telephone conversations

3min
page 121

E. Surveillance of telecommunications in a criminal context

9min
pages 131-133

2. Bulk interception regimes

4min
pages 138-139

C. Lawyers’ correspondence

10min
pages 127-129

2. Positive obligations

2min
page 116

3. Pollutant and potentially dangerous activities

2min
page 114

2. Noise disturbance, problems with neighbours and other nuisances

3min
page 113

E. Journalists’ homes

3min
page 110

C. Commercial premises

2min
page 108

D. Law firms

3min
page 109

5. Home visits, searches and seizures

7min
pages 106-107

2. Tenants

3min
page 103

1. Property owners

3min
page 102

2. Examples of “interference”

6min
pages 99-100

6. Material interests

2min
page 96

7. Testimonial privilege

2min
page 97

5. Immigration and expulsion

16min
pages 91-95

3. Children

39min
pages 77-87

4. Other family relationships

10min
pages 88-90

2. Parents

3min
page 76

B. Procedural obligation

3min
page 72

9. Statelessness, citizenship and residence

3min
page 68

7. Gender identity

7min
pages 64-65

3. Legal parent-child relationship

3min
page 62

2. Right to discover one’s origins

3min
page 61

10. Deportation and expulsion decisions

3min
page 69

11. Marital and parental status

2min
page 70

8. Right to ethnic identity

6min
pages 66-67

11. Privacy during detention and imprisonment

3min
page 59

9. Home visits, searches and seizures

3min
page 57

10. Lawyer-client relationship

3min
page 58

8. Stop and search police powers

3min
page 56

6. File or data gathering by security services or other organs of the State

6min
pages 53-54

5. Information about one’s health

3min
page 52

2. Protection of individual reputation; defamation

14min
pages 47-50

7. Police surveillance

3min
page 55

1. Right to one’s image and photographs; the publishing of photos, images, and articles

7min
pages 45-46

9. Environmental issues

3min
page 42

C. Privacy

3min
page 44

10. Sexual orientation and sexual life

3min
page 43

5. Health care and treatment

6min
pages 37-38

4. Mental illness/mesure of protection

7min
pages 35-36

8. Issues concerning burial and deceased persons

7min
pages 40-41

3. Forced medical treatment and compulsory medical procedures

3min
page 34

1. Private and family life

19min
pages 14-19

C. In the case of a negative obligation, was the interference conducted “in accordance with the law”?

7min
pages 10-11

2. Reproductive rights

6min
pages 32-33

B. Should the case be assessed from the perspective of a negative or positive obligation?

7min
pages 8-9

Note to readers

2min
page 6

2. Home and correspondence

8min
pages 20-22

2. Professional and business activities

13min
pages 26-29

D. Does the interference further a legitimate aim?

3min
page 12
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.