Mervinskiy 497

Page 53

Guide on Article 8 of the Convention – Right to respect for private and family life

late Article 8 because of its contribution to a debate of general interest (Fürst-Pfeifer v. Austria, § 45). 208. The Court has found that the collection and storage of a person’s health-related data for a very long period, together with the disclosure and use of such data for purposes unrelated to the original reasons for their collection, constituted a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private life (Surikov v. Ukraine, §§ 70 and 89, concerning the disclosure to an employer of the medical grounds for an employee’s dispensation from military service). 209. The disclosure – without a patient’s consent – of medical records, including information relating to an abortion, by a clinic to the Social Insurance Office, and therefore to a wider circle of public servants, constituted an interference with the patient’s right to respect for private life (M.S. v. Sweden, § 35). A criminal court’s dismissal of a defendant’s application to hear evidence which contained senstitive medical information in camera was also found to have breached Article 8 as the court had not carried out any individualised assessment of proportionalty (Frâncu v. Romania, §§ 6375). The disclosure of medical data by medical institutions to journalists and to a prosecutor’s office, and the collection of a patient’s medical data by an institution responsible for monitoring the quality of medical care were also held to have constituted an interference with the right to respect for private life (Mockutė v. Lithuania, § 95). In this case there had also been an interference with Article 8 concerning the information disclosed to the applicant’s mother, given the tense relations between the latter and her daughter (§ 100). 210. The right to effective access to information concerning health and reproductive rights falls within the scope of private and family life within the meaning of Article 8 (K.H. and Others v. Slovakia, § 44). There may be positive obligations inherent in effective respect for private or family life which require the State to provide essential information about risks to one’s health in a timely manner (Guerra and Others v. Italy, §§ 58 and 60). In particular, where a State engages in hazardous activities, which might have hidden adverse consequences on the health of those involved in such activities, respect for private and family life under Article 8 requires that an effective and accessible procedure be established which enables such persons to seek all relevant and appropriate information (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 97 and 101; Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], § 167, for instance to assess any risk to which a person may be exposed).

6. File or data gathering by security services or other organs of the State 35 211. This chapter should be read in conjunction with the one on Special secret surveillance of citizens/organisations, referring notably to the principles set out in the cases of Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden [GC] and Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC]. The Court has held that where a State institutes secret surveillance, the existence of which remains unknown to the persons being controlled with the effect that the surveillance remains unchallengeable, individuals could be deprived of their Article 8 rights without being aware and without being able to obtain a remedy either at the national level or before the Convention institutions (Klass and Others v. Germany, § 36). This is especially so in a climate where technological developments have advanced the means of espionage and surveillance, and where the State may have legitimate interests in preventing disorder, crime, or terrorism 36 (ibid., § 48). An applicant can claim to be the victim of a See also Surveillance of telecommunications in a criminal context and Special secret surveillance of citizens/organisations, and the Guide on Data protection. 36 See the Guide on Terrorism. 35

European Court of Human Rights

53/161

Last update: 31.08.2021


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

List of cited cases

50min
pages 140-161

D. Correspondence of private individuals, professionals and companies

2min
page 130

6. Correspondence with the Court

5min
pages 123-124

5. Correspondence between prisoners and their lawyer

3min
page 122

4. Telephone conversations

3min
page 121

E. Surveillance of telecommunications in a criminal context

9min
pages 131-133

2. Bulk interception regimes

4min
pages 138-139

C. Lawyers’ correspondence

10min
pages 127-129

2. Positive obligations

2min
page 116

3. Pollutant and potentially dangerous activities

2min
page 114

2. Noise disturbance, problems with neighbours and other nuisances

3min
page 113

E. Journalists’ homes

3min
page 110

C. Commercial premises

2min
page 108

D. Law firms

3min
page 109

5. Home visits, searches and seizures

7min
pages 106-107

2. Tenants

3min
page 103

1. Property owners

3min
page 102

2. Examples of “interference”

6min
pages 99-100

6. Material interests

2min
page 96

7. Testimonial privilege

2min
page 97

5. Immigration and expulsion

16min
pages 91-95

3. Children

39min
pages 77-87

4. Other family relationships

10min
pages 88-90

2. Parents

3min
page 76

B. Procedural obligation

3min
page 72

9. Statelessness, citizenship and residence

3min
page 68

7. Gender identity

7min
pages 64-65

3. Legal parent-child relationship

3min
page 62

2. Right to discover one’s origins

3min
page 61

10. Deportation and expulsion decisions

3min
page 69

11. Marital and parental status

2min
page 70

8. Right to ethnic identity

6min
pages 66-67

11. Privacy during detention and imprisonment

3min
page 59

9. Home visits, searches and seizures

3min
page 57

10. Lawyer-client relationship

3min
page 58

8. Stop and search police powers

3min
page 56

6. File or data gathering by security services or other organs of the State

6min
pages 53-54

5. Information about one’s health

3min
page 52

2. Protection of individual reputation; defamation

14min
pages 47-50

7. Police surveillance

3min
page 55

1. Right to one’s image and photographs; the publishing of photos, images, and articles

7min
pages 45-46

9. Environmental issues

3min
page 42

C. Privacy

3min
page 44

10. Sexual orientation and sexual life

3min
page 43

5. Health care and treatment

6min
pages 37-38

4. Mental illness/mesure of protection

7min
pages 35-36

8. Issues concerning burial and deceased persons

7min
pages 40-41

3. Forced medical treatment and compulsory medical procedures

3min
page 34

1. Private and family life

19min
pages 14-19

C. In the case of a negative obligation, was the interference conducted “in accordance with the law”?

7min
pages 10-11

2. Reproductive rights

6min
pages 32-33

B. Should the case be assessed from the perspective of a negative or positive obligation?

7min
pages 8-9

Note to readers

2min
page 6

2. Home and correspondence

8min
pages 20-22

2. Professional and business activities

13min
pages 26-29

D. Does the interference further a legitimate aim?

3min
page 12
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.