Mervinskiy 497

Page 69

Guide on Article 8 of the Convention – Right to respect for private and family life

es, entail a violation of Article 8 if they create disproportionate repercussions on the private or family life, or both, of the individuals concerned (Hoti v. Croatia, § 122). 285. Moreover, in this context, Article 8 may involve a positive obligation to ensure effective enjoyment of the applicant’s private and/or family life (Hoti v. Croatia, § 122). In the same case, the national authorities infringed a stateless immigrant’s right to private life by failing, for years, to regularise his resident’s status and leaving him in a situation of insecurity (§ 126). The State had not complied with its positive obligation to provide an effective and accessible procedure or combination of procedures enabling the applicant to have the issues of his further stay and status in Croatia determined with due regard to his private-life interests under Article 8 (§ 141). In Sudita Keita v. Hungary, the State also failed to comply with its positive obligation to provide an effective and accessible procedure, or a combination of procedures, enabling the de facto stateless applicant to have the issue of his status in Hungary determined with due regard to his private-life interests under Article 8 (§ 41). In particular, the applicant had had protracted difficulties in regularising his legal situation for fifteen years, with adverse repercussions on his access to healthcare and employment and his right to get married. 286. The Court has held the failure to regulate the residence of persons who had been “erased” from the permanent residents register following Slovenian independence to be a violation of Article 8 (Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], § 339). 287. Where there is an arguable claim that expulsion threatens to interfere with a non-citizen’s right to respect for his private and family life, Article 13 in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention requires that States must make available to the individual concerned the effective possibility of challenging the deportation or refusal of residence order and of having the relevant issues examined with sufficient procedural safeguards and thoroughness by an appropriate domestic forum offering adequate guarantees of independence and impartiality (De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], § 83; M. and Others v. Bulgaria, §§ 122-132; Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, § 133).

10. Deportation and expulsion decisions 47 288. As Article 8 protects the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world and can sometimes embrace aspects of an individual’s social identity, the Court has held that that the totality of social ties between settled migrants and the community in which they are living constitutes part of the concept of “private life” within the meaning of Article 8. Therefore, regardless of the existence of a “family life”, the expulsion of a settled migrant constitutes an interference with his or her right to respect for private life (Maslov and Others v. Austria [GC], § 63). 48 In order to determine whether the interference is necessary in a democratic society, it is important to bear in mind that States are entitled to control the entry of aliens into their territory and their residence there. The Convention does not guarantee the right of an alien to enter or to reside in a particular country and, in pursuance of their task of maintaining public order, Contracting States have the power to expel an alien convicted of criminal offences (ibid., § 68; Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], § 68). When assessing the proportionality of the interference under the right to private life, the Court has generally applied the criteria established in Üner v. the Netherlands [GC] (see, for example, Zakharchuk v. Russia, §§ 46 – 49) as regards settled migrants. For instance, in Levakovic v. Denmark, §§ 42-45, applying the Üner criteria, the Court did not find a violation of the “private 47 48

See also the Guide on Immigration. See also Deportation and expulsion decisions.

European Court of Human Rights

69/161

Last update: 31.08.2021


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

List of cited cases

50min
pages 140-161

D. Correspondence of private individuals, professionals and companies

2min
page 130

6. Correspondence with the Court

5min
pages 123-124

5. Correspondence between prisoners and their lawyer

3min
page 122

4. Telephone conversations

3min
page 121

E. Surveillance of telecommunications in a criminal context

9min
pages 131-133

2. Bulk interception regimes

4min
pages 138-139

C. Lawyers’ correspondence

10min
pages 127-129

2. Positive obligations

2min
page 116

3. Pollutant and potentially dangerous activities

2min
page 114

2. Noise disturbance, problems with neighbours and other nuisances

3min
page 113

E. Journalists’ homes

3min
page 110

C. Commercial premises

2min
page 108

D. Law firms

3min
page 109

5. Home visits, searches and seizures

7min
pages 106-107

2. Tenants

3min
page 103

1. Property owners

3min
page 102

2. Examples of “interference”

6min
pages 99-100

6. Material interests

2min
page 96

7. Testimonial privilege

2min
page 97

5. Immigration and expulsion

16min
pages 91-95

3. Children

39min
pages 77-87

4. Other family relationships

10min
pages 88-90

2. Parents

3min
page 76

B. Procedural obligation

3min
page 72

9. Statelessness, citizenship and residence

3min
page 68

7. Gender identity

7min
pages 64-65

3. Legal parent-child relationship

3min
page 62

2. Right to discover one’s origins

3min
page 61

10. Deportation and expulsion decisions

3min
page 69

11. Marital and parental status

2min
page 70

8. Right to ethnic identity

6min
pages 66-67

11. Privacy during detention and imprisonment

3min
page 59

9. Home visits, searches and seizures

3min
page 57

10. Lawyer-client relationship

3min
page 58

8. Stop and search police powers

3min
page 56

6. File or data gathering by security services or other organs of the State

6min
pages 53-54

5. Information about one’s health

3min
page 52

2. Protection of individual reputation; defamation

14min
pages 47-50

7. Police surveillance

3min
page 55

1. Right to one’s image and photographs; the publishing of photos, images, and articles

7min
pages 45-46

9. Environmental issues

3min
page 42

C. Privacy

3min
page 44

10. Sexual orientation and sexual life

3min
page 43

5. Health care and treatment

6min
pages 37-38

4. Mental illness/mesure of protection

7min
pages 35-36

8. Issues concerning burial and deceased persons

7min
pages 40-41

3. Forced medical treatment and compulsory medical procedures

3min
page 34

1. Private and family life

19min
pages 14-19

C. In the case of a negative obligation, was the interference conducted “in accordance with the law”?

7min
pages 10-11

2. Reproductive rights

6min
pages 32-33

B. Should the case be assessed from the perspective of a negative or positive obligation?

7min
pages 8-9

Note to readers

2min
page 6

2. Home and correspondence

8min
pages 20-22

2. Professional and business activities

13min
pages 26-29

D. Does the interference further a legitimate aim?

3min
page 12
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.