ALVARO
QUISPE | PORTFOLIO
M.Arch | 416.878.7189 | quispe.c.alvaro@gmail.com
ALVARO
QUISPE
alvaro.quispe@mail.utoronto.ca C: 416.878.7189 | H: 416.466.5999
69 Boston Avenue Toronto, ON, M4M 2T8
OBJECTIVE Graduate seeking full-time employment in an established firm to continue career in the architectural field. EDUCATION Master of Architecture (M.Arch.), University of Toronto | December 2014 Bachelor of Architectural Science (B.Arch.Sci.), Ryerson University | June 2010 SKILLS o o o o
Excellent in both manual and digital tools such as sketching, drafting, physical model making, digital art illustrations, photography, 3D model production, and parametric model production. Ability to take leadership within a team setting, creating a cohesive unit for all group members to participate directly in the design process and production of architecture. Fluent in both Spanish and English. proficient knowledge in a variety of computer programs in both PCs and MACs, including: • • • •
Autodesk AutoCAD 2014 / AutoCAD Autodesk Revit Architecture 2013 Autodesk 3ds Max 2012 Rhinoceros Nurbs Modeling 5.0
3D Modeling
• • • •
Grasshopper 3D (Build 0.9) Google Sketchup Pro 2013 Adobe Creative Suite 6 (Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, and Bridge) Microsoft Office 2013 (Outlook, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, etc)
WORK EXPERIENCE (September 2014 - December 2014) John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture · Landscape · Design. University of Toronto, Canada. Design Studio 1 Teaching Assistant o Assisted in workshops, tutorials, management, and critiques for an undergraduate studio class of 20 students. o Responsible for teaching students manual tools and digital software programs in architecture such as: Adobe Creative Suite 6, AutoCAD, Rhinoceros 3D, and Sketchup Pro. (May 2014 - August 2014) BBB Architects, Toronto, Canada. Designer o o
Assisted in projects phases including, but not limited to: preliminary design, schematic design. Responsible for completing 3D models in Revit, followed by the production of architectural diagrams, illustrations, and renderings for presentations.
(September 2012 - May 2013 | September 2013 - Current) John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture · Landscape · Design. University of Toronto, Canada. Digital Fabrication Laboratory Assistant o Assisted in workshops, tutorials, and management for the school’s digital fabrication laboratory. o Responsible for teaching students software and setup of digital fabrication tools, specifically laser cutting systems.
WORK EXPERIENCE (CONT’D) (September 2010 - September 2012) WZMH Architects, Toronto, Canada. Junior Designer o o
Assisted in projects phases including, but not limited to: preliminary design, schematic design, design development, and working drawings. Responsible for creating complete 3D models, renderings, presentation booklets, SPA documents, site documentation, and consultant coordination.
(May 2008/2009 - August 2008/2009 | May 2010 - September 2010 | May 2013 - September 2013) Isosceles Design/Build, Toronto, Canada. Draftsman o Assisted Partner-in-Charge with the design process of small mixed-used projects throughout Toronto. o Responsible for producing permit drawings, site documentation, and consultant coordination. o Collaborated with Partner-in-Charge and team with on site construction duties such as underpinning, wood framing, window and door installation, concrete formwork, rebar placement, and pouring. ACHIEVEMENTS o o o o o o
University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of A·L·D. Tactical Resilience. (A.Quispe, Exhibit Assistant Designer). September - November, 2014 Ryerson University, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture, and Science Dean’s List 2009-2010 Canadian Architecture Students Association (CASA). National Portfolio 2010. (A.Quispe, Graphic Designer) City of Toronto: 2010 Ryerson University 2009. 325 Magazine. (A.Quispe, Graphic Designer) City of Toronto: 2009 Ryerson University 2008. 16 Cities: Waterfronts Around the World. (A.Quispe, Ed.) City of Toronto: 2008 Ontario Scholar Award, Riverdale Collegiate Institute, 2006
VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE o o o o
University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of A·L·D. Architectural Representation 1. (A.Quispe, Guest Reviewer) December 2014 AIAS Ryerson University Chapter, Forum 2010: Action|Reaction. City of Toronto, Event Volunteer 2010-2011 AIAS Ryerson University Chapter, Forum 2008: Energy. City of Denver, Event Volunteer 2008-2009 Canadian Architecture Students Association (CASA) Ryerson University, Internal Representative 2009 - 2010
REFERENCES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
CONTENTS
4
RECIPROCITY: MICRO HAVENS
7
M.Arch: Architecture Thesis 2014
HENRY MOORE WATERFRONT SCULPTURAL CENTRE
25
B.Arch: Year III Studio
BAQA’A COMMUNITY CENTRE
33
B.Arch: Architecture Thesis 2006
DUFFERIN GROVE COMMUNITY COMMON
47
M.Arch: Year II Comprehensive Studio
URBAN PILLOW: DORMITORY
57
M.Arch: Year III Design Option Studio
WZMH ARCHITECTS St. Thomas Consolidated Courthouse
Q-Ship Tower
73
North York City Centre - Food Court Renovation
79
BBB ARCHITECTS Moncton Central Sports & Entertainment Centre
69
Madison Square Garden: Luxury Lounge & Bar Concept Proposal
5
89
97
RECIPROCITY: MICRO HAVENS Course: M.Arch Thesis, Fall 2014 Professor: Josemaria de Churtichaga Master of Architecture (Year III - Advanced Placement) University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape & Design
Reciprocity, known as the mutual exchange amongst two or more parties is the foundation of human development. On a global scale the thought of reciprocity or reciprocal exchange should be a key component in travel especially in emerging countries, but this is a fallacy. As it currently stands the spectrum of travel contains two leaders: Big Tourism and Home Stay where the first dominates in its position of economic commerce while the second dominates is its position of reciprocity. Distinctively, Big Tourism leads travellers to easy, reliable, and recognizable expeditions but is a highly scripted and repetitive experience. The Home Stay leads more adventuresome travellers to a less scripted and more cultural expedition by directly having the traveller live under a local’s roof. Although this provides great reciprocal experience between local and traveller, many difficulties are present such as with privacy and comfort. This leads to question: can a new system can be created to harness both positive ends of these types of travels? Can a new proposal for travel within emerging countries be created for the ultimate reciprocal exchange in culture and economics for both the traveller and the local? Using Peru as its area of study, this thesis explores architecture’s potential to converge with technology and be a threshold to directly merge these two types of travel into a third type, ensuring the ultimate reciprocal exchange for all involved. Through the creation of prototypical Micro Havens, locals will be able to fashion secure, comfortable, and centrally located places for tourists to stay, allowing maximum exposure to the surrounding community and environment. This project seeks to be a catalyst for resiliency among communities and at the same time create a outstanding experience for the global traveller who desires cultural experiences, education, and social interactions.
0.0
INTRODUCTION
0.4
Scripted Experiences Travel Type 1
But I find it funny how people visit Peru, because the first thing that everyone asks me is: how was Machu Picchu and what website/agency is most reliable and convenient to get there. I find my suggestions are often overlook in favor of packaged trip or expedia. On the surface everyone seems like they had a great trip as most say “Machu Picchu was amazing, the hotels were comfortable, the nightlife was very fun, and the Inca burger was delicious.” But for me it seems all too familiar, because everyone has the same story,
UCTION
ciprocity
efinition
By definition reciprocity means the mutual exchange between two parties.1 To put this word into real context it can be said that every day and everywhere there is an interactive exchange amongst people. Like a person at a bar. In this event many things happen, for one your away from home, and in another physical space and place where light, materials, and the overall architecture are key in creating a comfortable atmosphere, and most
0.0 scripted INTRODUCTION the same package, the same repeated experience.2 And with But I find it funny how people visit Peru, because the first thing that that it seems odd to me that with this type of the travel, big tourism, everyone it is asks me is: how was Machu Picchu and what website/agency is a rarity for anyone to tell a story of0.4 having anScripted intimateExperiences experience, a most real reliable and convenient to get there. I find my suggestions are often interaction, a true reciprocal exchange with Peruvian culture and locals. overlook in favor of packaged trip or expedia. On the surface everyone But for me it seems all too familiar, because everyone has the same story, seems like they had a great trip as most say “Machu Picchu was amazing, Travel Type 1 the same package, the same repeated scripted experience. And with the hotels were comfortable, the nightlife was very fun, and the Inca burger that it seems odd to me that with this type of the travel, big tourism, was it is delicious.” a rarity for anyone to tell a story of having an intimate experience, a real interaction, a true reciprocal exchange with Peruvian culture and locals.But for me it seems all too familiar, because everyone has the same story,
importantly mutual exchange occurs as embodied in this photo. In this moment between you or this case the man and the bartender, something beautiful happens, there is an exchange of money for a delicious drink, 2 2 there is an0.0 exchange of ideas, an exchange of stories, 0.0 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Butinterests, I find itdifferences, funny But how I findpeople it funny visithow Peru, people because visitthe Peru, firstbecause thing that the first thing the thatsame package, the the samesame package, repeated the scripted same repeated experience. scripted And experience. with And with and culture, which is extraordinary for by the endeveryone of this experience both asks me everyone is: how asks was Machu me is: how Picchu wasand Machu whatPicchu website/agency and what is website/agency thatisit seems odd that to me it seems that with odd to thisme type that ofwith the travel, this type bigoftourism, the travel, it isbig tourism, it is parties benefit parties fromScripted this mutual exchange, this two 0.4 and bothScripted 0.4grow Experiences Experiences most reliable andmost convenient reliable to and getconvenient there. I find to my get suggestions there. I find are my suggestions often are often a rarity for anyone a rarity to tellfora anyone story of to having tell a an story intimate of having experience, an intimate a real experience, a real way street. This is reciprocity.
Travel Type 1
1 | Reciprocity
INTRODUCTION
0.2
Reciprocity + Tourism
INTRODUCTION
0.5
Less Scripted Experiences Travel Type 1
2 | Scripted Experience
10
0.0
0.0
overlook in favoroverlook of packaged in favor tripoforpackaged expedia. trip On the or expedia. surface everyone On the surface everyone interaction, a true interaction, reciprocalaexchange true reciprocal with Peruvian exchangeculture with Peruvian and locals. culture and locals. seems like they had seems a great like they trip as had most a great say trip “Machu as most Picchu saywas “Machu amazing, Picchu was amazing, But for me it seems But all fortoo me familiar, it seemsbecause all too familiar, everyone because has theeveryone same story, has the same story, Travel Type 1 the hotels were comfortable, the hotels were thecomfortable, nightlife wasthe verynightlife fun, andwas thevery Incafun, burger and the Inca burger the same package, the same the same package, repeated the same scripted repeated experience. scripted Andexperience. with And with was delicious.” was delicious.” that it seems odd that to me it seems that with odd to thisme type that ofwith the travel, this type bigoftourism, the travel, it isbig tourism, it is a rarity for anyone a rarity to tellfora anyone story of to having tell a an story intimate of having experience, an intimate a real experience, a real But for me it seems But all fortoo me familiar, it seemsbecause all too familiar, everyone because has theeveryone same story, has the same story, interaction, a true interaction, reciprocal aexchange true reciprocal with Peruvian exchange culture with Peruvian and locals. culture and locals.
10
And with this focus in mind I began to think about how reciprocity or reciprocal exchange is embodied on a global scale such as with tourism, where people who are passionate about travelling exchange wealth for the opportunity to go away from home to another country, another physical space and place, to learn about people’s landscapes, cultures, and locales.
0.0
INTRODUCTION
0.9
Travel Spectrum
the same package, the same repeated scripted ex that it seems odd to me that with this type of the tra a rarity for anyone to tell a story of having an intima interaction, a true reciprocal exchange with Peruvia But for me it seems all too familiar, because everyon the same package, the same repeated scripted ex that it seems odd to me that with this type of the tra a rarity for anyone to tell a story of having an intima interaction, a true reciprocal exchange with Peruvian
But for the more adventuresome who want authentic foods, o festivals or events that I know of and been too, I tell them go ou to see the Condor versus the Bull festival, or Moray where th locals folk dance, or try a piranha from the rainforest. But look these photos, I think about how these so called “authentic ex
11
So looking at this spectrum of travel, we have big tourism on one end, where it is safe, reliable/convenient, easy but concentrates money to the few and is a highly scripted experience lacking reciprocal exchange with local culture. On the other side, we find the Home Stay where there is reciprocal exchange, but money is being distributed to too few families, it’s not as comfortable in terms of privacy and freedoms because you are in someone’s house, and accessibility or ease to go on this type of travel
involves many background checks and references. Looking at the middle of this spectrum, I could not help but feel there was a void to be filled. I started to question whether it was possible to create a system, revolving around a specific space, where the best of both worlds can be had, with the ultimate result of creating reciprocal exchange between travellers and hosts.
5
10
10
11
12
BIG TOURISM
global travel
cons: · concentrates money to the few (more affluent community) · highly scripted (not intimate)
1.1 | Global Tourism
11
20
6
5 | Travel Spectrum 7
8
HOME STAY pros: · safe · reliable · easy
reciprocal exchange: · distribute wealth, experience, and culture to the many
pros: · undisguised experience
cons: · money to too few (one family)
(less scripted)
· not as comfortable
· cultural immersion · inexpensive (cheap)
(lack of privacy and freedom) · harder to access (rules and regulations)
21
r the more adventuresome who want authentic foods, or seek real als or events that I know of and been too, I tell them go outside Cusco the Condor versus the Bull festival, or Moray where thousands of folk dance, or try a piranha from the rainforest. But looking back at photos, I think about how these so called “authentic experiences”
0.0 INTRODUCTION But for the more adventuresome who want authentic foods, or seek real are actually not authentic at all, if we think of authenticity as experiencing festivals or events that I know of and been too, I tell them go outside Cusco some kind of ancient or untouched being there and taking 0.5 culture. Just by Less Scripted to see the Condor versus the Bull festival, or Moray where thousands of photos I, along with every other traveller, have touched the untouched and Experiences locals folk dance, or try a piranha from the rainforest. But looking back at thus a fallacy is acknowledged. these photos, I think about how these so called “authentic experiences” Travel Type 1
0.0
INTRODUCTION
0.6
Globalization
or seek real are actually not areauthentic actually not at all, authentic if we think at all, of authenticity if we think ofasauthenticity experiencing as experiencing utside Cusco some kind of ancient some kind or untouched of ancient or culture. untouched Just byculture. being there Just by and being taking there and taking housandsphotos of I, alongphotos with every I, along other with traveller, every other havetraveller, touched the haveuntouched touched the anduntouched and king backthus at a fallacy is thus acknowledged. a fallacy is acknowledged. xperiences”
are actually not authentic at all, if we think of authenticity as experiencing some kind of ancient or untouched culture. Just by being there and taking photos I, along with every other traveller, have touched the untouched and thus a fallacy is acknowledged.
0.0
INTRODUCTION
0.7
Home Stay Travel Type 2
The fact is, we do live in a world that is globalized, where travellers have pollinated world cultures with new ideas just by visiting and exposing themselves and the different places they come from. As is embodied by this photo, the local Peruvian native, perhaps never being able to travel outside his country, still knows about the world or the baseball team called the Los Angeles Angels. Regardless of his conscious or unconscious decision to wear his hat, that fact is that he chose it speaks volumes about
3 | Less-Scripted Experience
The question then is, where can a traveller find this, where can they have a more personal/reciprocal exchange? The answer leads us to the other side of the travel spectrum which is the Home Stay, which is for people who desire a less scripted experience of a country.3 This type of travel is great because you are culturally immersed as you’re involved with all experiences of your hosting family what they eat, they’re daily routines. It’s also a great way to experience intimacy because of the
globalization and the growing intimacy that’s happening everywhere today. Where some would think this is problematic, I believe this growing globalism is something we should embrace. And I believe that what the adventuresome traveller is looking for is actually reciprocity. They want to 0.0 knowledge, INTRODUCTION Theknow, question then is,things, where can a traveller find this, where can they have a challenge their challenge what they learn new more personal/reciprocal exchange? The answer leads us to the other side and to teach new things in return. 0.7 Home Stay of the travel spectrum which is the Home Stay, which is for people who desire a less scripted experience of a country.3
Travel Type 2
3 | Globalization
This type of travel is great because you are culturally immersed as you’re involved with all experiences of your hosting family what they eat, they’re daily routines. It’s also a great way to experience intimacy because of the
4 | Home Stay
consistent contact with your host, and its relatively cheap way to trave However, as great as this immersed experience can be, it does come wit its difficulties. Because you are directly living under another family’s ro you could experience a lack of privacy unlike with a hotel, or let’s not forge that most homes have rules such as curfews and often forbid bringing hom new friends, restricting your freedom. In fact, the traveller conforms to th family’s lifestyle. And finally to access this type of travel is cumbersom due to applications and references checks
0.0
INTRODUCTION
0.13
Sites for Prototypes
To try out this concept, Peru was used an are chosen, each pertaining to distinct geograph district. 1. City of Cusco (city) 2. Inka trail (andes) 3. Lake Titicaca (water) HOMESTAY
13
12
0.0
INTRODUCTION
0.11
Reciprocal Exchange Web
In the current time that we’re in, social networks allows us to connect anywhere in the globe, as such a platform can be used like Airbnb, to allow tourist and local to connect.5 This would permit travellers reliability to book trips for comfort, new sites, and sustenance where reciprocal exchange
of culture, knowledge and social experience can occur for both parties, 0.0 and in turn the local also gets a benefits of economic growth leading to community development and personal fulfillment because of his new role 0.12 of global travel.
INTRODUCTION Distribution of Economics + Roles
$
In terms of distribution of economics and roles, the haven is a nucleus where multiple locals can participate. For instance, inside the haven one local can house keep while another can takes care of cooking, and another can later teach about cultural craft or endow knowledge to the visitor.
Social Experience
$
$ $ 13
$
14
$
$
$
$ LOCAL FESTIVALS+ EVENTS
LOCALS
Micro-Havens
$
$
$
$ 15
LOCAL HOUSEKEEPING
$$
LOCAL KNOWLEDGE
$
$
Micro-Havens
LOCAL FOOD
$
LOCAL ADVENTURE
$
SITE 1: C
SITE 2: I
LOCAL TRADITIONS
Comfort
$ $
Sites Food
6 | Micro Havens : Reciprocal Exchange Web
SITE 3: L
Personal Fulfillment
Community Development
$
LOCAL INTERACTIONS
$
Economic Growth
$ 24
$
$ LOCAL SITES
16
$
TOURIST
$
13
Outside the haven another local can take out the traveller to festivals and events, new sites, adventure, and new cultural interactions.
$
$
Knowledge Culture Experience
16
13
26
25
7 | Micro Havens : Distribution of Economics + Roles
28
9
8 | Sites
27
1.0
DESIGN
1.11
Site 1: Cusco
Looking at the site’s surroundings a current construction methods, and p this investigation, Peruvian textiles to its material abundance and cultur
Local Materials + Construction
$
$
N
EMBED 2.0
DESIGN
2.2
Site 2: Inca Trail
$
Located on a hillside, the site is adjacent to local community and a historic Inca site known as Llactapata.
Exterior Perspective
$
Balcony View
Analysis
+
$
$
$
$
scripted experiences hotels city centre
H H
$
H
H
$
$
H
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
DDESIGN R I FTheTsite chosen is beside one of floating Urus community islands.
3.0
1
3.3
SITE 1
Site 3: Lake Titicaca
$
$
$
$
Exterior Perspective
Prototype 1 | Frame
Context Plan 1:20,000
+
$
Analysis
$
brick wood
clay block | US
clay block
$ $
$Interior Perspective
N
$
$
N
concrete
$ Site Plan 1:1000
$
$
3.0
DESIGN
3.4
Site 3: Lake Titicaca
$
$
SITE
2
$
SITE clay block | US$20/m2
concrete | US$180/m2
adobe block | US$180/m2
1.2 | Cusc
$
brick
wood
N
The Urus community i travertine | US of one material: Totora building material for a structure, and boats.
Urus Community
+
tin roof
$
adobe block
$
$
$
1.1 | Site 1: Cusco $
Site Location 1: 10,000
$
tin roof
$
SITE
$
$
N
$
$
$$
SITE 1 $
$
$
$
Si
$
$
$
$
$
2.5
$
$
local experiences
$
2.0
SITE
spanish roof tile | US$20/m2
SITE
clay block N
$
$
N
adobe block
Site Location 1:10,000
Exterior Perspective Context Plan 1: 10,000
Prototype 2 | Embed
Interior Perspective
2.1 | Site 2: Inka Trail
Site Location regular plate glass1: 5000 | US$90/m2
travertine | US$175/m2
Street + Study: Layering of Building Materials
tin sheet | US$15/m2
2.2 | Inka
Site Plan 1: 1,000 peruvian handmade textiles | US$2/m2
peruvian hand-made ceramics | US$1/piece
Catalogue of current Building Materials + Potential Building Materials
+
SITE
3
SITE
concrete
52 piled-up
wedged
denticulated
flat-fitted
rough
smooth
SITE
natural
Spanish Roof Tile Illactapata Ruin (Inka Construction)
Local Community Construction N
38
Prototype 3 | Drift
SITE
N
encased
braced
dowelled
flat-fitted
cushioned
convex
bevelled edges
3.1 | Site 3: Lake Titicaca
Context Plan 1: 20,000
Site Location 1: 10,000
Illactapata Ruin
3.2 | Lake
Site Plan 1: 750
Inka Building Methods: Wall Construction
+
N flat
Current Community Construction: Adobe Block Buildings
Site Location 1: 5,000 N
Context References
Tile sub-structure
SITE 2
1:200
96
Th
Landscape/Contour Influence 1.Bed + Push-Down dinner table 2. Kitchen 3. Lavatory 4. Balcony
Uros Community (Floating Islands)
Wood Frame
Totora Reed Construction
Totora Reed Structure & Weave Details
House + Boat Construction
N
3
A
66
2 1
10 4
72
Ceiling Textile Frame Finish
catalogue was made of local materials, potential materials for construction. In s took lead into the first prototype due ral method of production (handmade).
1.0
DESIGN
1.7
Site 1: Cusco
To begin the design of the first prototype, parameters where placed such as referencing adjacent building for site line production.
Following this method, a small dwelling program was created through the main design intent of framing the city.
Site Parameters+Program
1.0
DESIGN
ite 2: Inca Trail
DESIGN
1.10
Beside the community, the Llactapata ruin embraces the elements of landscape and architecture. In this investigation of materials and construction, Incan architecture explores the wall as a core element to build within the landscape: embed.
Site 1: Cusco
Prior to investigating construction and materiality, nonetheless containing program, the building becomes a scaffold for reciprocal exchange, waiting to inherit its surroundings: cultural materials and construction methods.
Building Scaffold
Analysis
S$20/m2
concrete | US$180/m2
adobe block | US$180/m2
spanish roof tile | US$20/m2
2.0
is a unique where locals live on floating islands made regular glass is the | main US$90/m2 aS$175/m2 reed plant. In this setting the plate plant alone
almost everything in the community including houses, co: Local Amenities
2.0
DESIGN
N2.6
Site 2: Inca Trail
tin sheet | US$15/m2
hand-made ceramics | US$1/p
3.0
DESIGN
3.9
Site 3: Lake Titicaca
peruvian handmade textiles | US$2/m2
2.6 2.6
44
Influenced by the nature of this investigation, a parti was developed where a (1) space is (2) formed by the sites terrain, (3) divided by its scenic views of mountains, rivers, community, and historical ruin, (4) and finally embedding into the landscape through walls in which a flexible dwelling
DESIGN
2.8
Site 2: Inca Trail
N Building Scaffold
program canby be the created. 2.0 the DESIGN DESIGN Influenced Influenced by nature nature of this of this investigation, investigation, DESIGN aInfluenced parti a parti waswas bydeveloped the developed nature of this investigation, a parti was developed Parti where where a (1)aspace (1) space is (2)is formed (2) formed by the by the sitessites terrain, where (3) divided (3) a1:200 divided (1) space by its byscenic is its(2) scenic formed by the sites terrain, (3) divided by its scenic Siteterrain, References SiteSite 2: Inca 2: Inca TrailTrailviews 2.6 rivers, Site 2: Inca views of mountains, of mountains, rivers, community, community, andTrail and historical historical viewsruin, ofruin, mountains, (4) and (4) and finally rivers, finally community, and historical ruin, (4) and finally embedding embedding intointo the the landscape landscape through through walls walls in which in embedding which a flexible a flexible intodwelling the dwelling landscape through walls in which a flexible dwelling program program cancan be created. be created. program can be created. PartiParti Parti
2.0 2.0
Once again, the build is a scaffold for reciprocal exchange to occur with its surrounding context of materials, construction methods, and culture. Thus as investigated previously, the building can take on new characteristics from its context of Inca wall construction and local adobe block construction methods.
Program 1:200 45
1.4 | Parti
1.5 | Scaffold
As mentioned the Totora Plan is utilized heavily in the site’s context. Through bundling and weaving the material can take on multiple uses such as boats, roofs, walls, floors, structure, and more.
50
Materiality: Totora Reed Plant
3.0
DESIGN
3.5
Site 3: Lake Titicaca
Through this investigation of site, community, and culture a parti was created. In a place where (1) space floats on water the building takes on (2) forces that can pull in multiple directions, where (3) rotation of these forces can occur in all directions, finally (4) opening the space on all sides.
Parti
1_space
2_form
1_space 1_space
3.0
DESIGN
3.8
Site 3: Lake Titicaca Building Scaffold
3_divide
2_form 2_form 1_space
4_embed
2_form 3_divide 3_divide
3_divide 4_embed 4_embed
2.4 | Parti
Trail: Past & Present
As a scaffold, the building can take on new characteristics from its context in the Urus Community, their building materials and methods.
4_embed
2.5 | Scaffold
74
75 74 74
74
75 75
78
75
53
natural
carved
rustic
refined
coarse
rough
smooth
1_space
cushioned
2_forces
convex
3_rotate
flat
4_open
3.4 | Parti
Titicaca: Floating Islands
bevelled edges
3.5 | Scaffold
98
99
104
97
73 106
107
11
1.0
DESIGN
1.14
Site 1: Cusco Exterior Rendering
Prototype 1: Frame | Exterior Perspective
58
59
12
1.0
DESIGN
1.15
Site 1: Cusco Interior Rendering
Prototype 1: Frame | Interior Perspective
60
61
13
N
Context References
1:200
1.Bed + Push-Down dinner table 2. Kitchen 3. Lavatory 4. Balcony
3
A
2 1
4
N
A Building Plan
1:75
Flexible Bed/Dinning Space Spanish Roof Tile Framed Textile Exterior Finish + Interior Framed Textile Balustrade
14
lication of its material catalogue, the scaffold takes on a f reciprocol exchange, where it inherits cultural building aterials, and new methods. In this first prototype the ded with cultural textiles made by locals. Spanish Roof Tile
building is not only a place for reciprocity for local and so a site for reciprocity to in culture and architecture.
Tile sub-structure
Wood Frame
Ceiling Textile Frame Finish
Exterior Textile Frame Finish Concrete Block Wall Glass
Textile Frame Balustrade
Concrete Floor/Slab
15
Exploded Perspective: Material Breakdown Prototype 1: Frame | Exploded Axonometric 55
2.0 2.10
DESIGN Site 2: Inca Trail Exterior Rendering
Prototype 2: Embed | Exterior Perspective
84
85
16
2.0
DESIGN
2.11
Site 2: Inca Trail Interior Rendering
Prototype 2: Embed | Interior Perspective
86
87
17
1_building block
2_form
3_divide
4_embed
Building Parti
1.Bed + Push-Down dinner table 2. Kitchen 3. Lavatory 4. Multi-Purpose Spaces
4 4
3
4
2
4
1
A
A
4
N
Building Plan 1:75
Thatch Roof Structural Wood Beams + Girders Adobe Block Wall Glass
18
prototype the building takes on rural methods of building uch as adobe block construction, thatch roofing, and stone Thatch Roof
Wood Frame Structure
Adobe Block Wall
Glass
Natural Sand Floor
Natural Stone Floor
19
Exploded Axonometric: MaterialAxonometric Breakdown Prototype 2: Embed | Exploded 81
3.0
DESIGN
3.11
Site 3: Lake Titicaca Exterior Rendering
Prototype 3: Drift | Exterior Perspective
110
111
20
3.0
DESIGN
3.12
Site 3: Lake Titicaca Interior Rendering
Prototype 3: Drift | Interior Perspective
112
11
21
1_building block
2_forces
3_rotate
4_ open
Building Parti
1. Fold-Out Bed 2. Fold Down Island 3. Kitchen 4. Lavatory 5. Walking Deck
3 2
A
5
A
4 1
Building Plan 1:75
Reservoir Tank Gas Light Double Wall Outboard Motor + Generator
prototype the building takes on methods of building from the Urus Community and the Totora Plant where roofs, are assembled., along with modern elements altogether ique architecture through reciprocity.
Totora Reed Roof
Wood Frame Structure
Corrugated Sliding Doors Totora Reed Roof
Wood Post Rope Balustrade Reservoir Tank Totora Floor Outboard Motor
Totora Beams (Buoyancy Support)
Fuel Tank Septic Tank
23
109 Prototype 3: Drift | Exploded Axonometric
HENRY MOORE WATERFRONT SCULPTURAL CENTRE Course: Studio III ARC21A/B (Fall/Winter Semester 2008/2009) Professor: John Ingrao Bachelor of Architectural Science Ryerson University
This studio project held complexity in both design and technical design. With the premise for creating a sculpture centre, located within Toronto’s East Bayfront, for housing and displaying significant Henry Moore sculptures, this year long project involved many phases of design (i.e. preliminary, schematic, and design development). Site analysis, Ontario Building Code study were also considered within building design. The final design of my sculptural centre considered transparencies and visual voids.
Site Analysis
Site: Toronto Waterfront
26
S
10min MG
S P
Galleries Schools Parking Distances
MG
P
MG
Circulation Routes
Building Heights
Open Space
27
5 min
1 : 100
A203-THIRD FLOOR
Third Floor Plan
1 www.autodesk.com/revit
28 Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
Design Concept
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
5. visual activity
GALLERY SPACE 15
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
DISPLAY OTB
UP
9
LIBRARY/ RESOURCE CENTRE
GALLERY SPACE
STUDENT WORKSHOP
8
DN
No.
Description
Date
UP
10
DN
STUDENT WORKSHOP
UP
4. sculptural Void
STORAGE 14
1 1 : 100
A202-SECOND FLOOR
13
12
6
5
4
2
1
11
3
Owner
Second Floor Plan
Project Name www.autodesk.com/revit
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
Unnamed
15
GALLERY SPACE
Project Number
Project number Consultant Address Date Address Phone Fax Drawn bye-mail Consultant Checked Address by Address Phone Fax e-mail
GALLERY SPACE
DISPLAY
UP
9
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
Issue Date Author Checker
A103 1 : 100
12/01/2012 4:06:56 AM
CURATOR’S OFFICE
Scale
3. void
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
ARCHIVES
OTB
OTB
8
DN
UP
10
DN DN
STORAGE
COAT STORAGE
SERVICE
14
Description
No.
Date
2. visual Inactivity
www.autodesk.com/revit
1
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
1 : 100
A201-FIRST FLOOR
13
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
DN
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
DN DN
DN
Owner
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
15
Project Name
DN
DN
6000
Unnamed
UP
9
UP
Project number
Project Number
Date
6000
Issue Date
Drawn by
OUTDOOR SEATING
CAFE SEATING
Author
Checked by
Checker
8
OUTDOOR GARDEN
DN
6000
A102
No.
Description
12/01/2012 4:05:55 AM
12
6
5
4
3
2
1
11
Ground Floor Plan
Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail
1. plates
ATRIUM
Date
Scale
1 : 100
UP
10
UP
6000
STORAGE
RECEPTION
LOADING
CAFE/KITCHEN
14
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
roof parapet
glazing top overhang
restaurant parapet
suspended ceiling tile
spandrel panel steel beam
full height vision wall glazing wood louvres concrete column
glazing base overhang
Section Cut: Grand Atrium
Wall Section Detail
29
30
31
Henry Moore Waterfront Sculpture Centre
BAQA’A COMMUNITY CENTRE Course: Thesis ARC41A (Fall/Winter Semester 2009-2010) Thesis Instructor: Jamie Lee (WZMH Architects) Thesis Mentor: Mark Baechler (Teeple Architects) Bachelor of Architectural Science Ryerson University
Since the advent of Israel’s establishment as a state, the immigration flux of 500,000 West Bank Palestinians moving into Jordan holds historic significance of human progress and growth for new urban fabrics. With the assimilation of the Palestinian population, as well as economic development, 78% of the country’s population live within urban environments today. However, the past priority of the dwelling unit has currently raised negligence of community amenities and open space within certain cities, such as Baqa’a. Thus, the creation of a community centre, amalgamating landscape and building, progressing human hierarchy of needs is the focus of this thesis.
LOCATION
World Atlas
Middle East
Jordan t
s fa s
existing
s m sc c
gr
s h
m
m
g s Russia
c
s Canada UK
c
Germany Serbia
France
Syria
Italy United States Canada
Algeria
w
4 5
23
Pakistan
China
s
require
Russia
Nepal
Palestine
UK
Mexico
1
Germany
Bangladesh
Lebanon
Thailand France Chad
Costa Rica Panama United States
Venezuela
Serbia Syria JORDAN
Mexico
Panama
Sierra Leone Liberia
Bangladesh
Namibia Ivory Coast Egypt Sudan
Papua
Thailand
Tanzania India
JORDAN
Chad Venezuela
China Malaysia Nepal
Kenya Lebanon
DRC Ecuador Costa Rica
India Pakistan
Yemen Ethiopia
Italy Sierra Leone Ivory Coast Egypt Sudan Liberia Cameroon Palestine Algeria Congo
Yemen Mozambique Ethiopia
Malaysia
Australia
Cameroon
Kenya
South Africa
Congo DRC
Papua
Tanzania
1,500,000 + Ecuador 1,250,000 1,000,000 750,000 500,000 250,000 100,000 30,000 5000 1,500,000 + 1,250,000
Stage 1: Location/Site/Conflict 1,000,000 750,000 500,000
Mozambique Population: Namibia Jordan Refugee
1,835,704
Australia
Refugee Population: South Africa
Jordan Refugee Population: 1,835,704
Stage 2: Site framework vs. local urban framework
Refugee Population:
250,000 100,000 30,000 5000
34
Site
Grid
Fracture1 over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over
Fracture2
under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under
Fracture3 Fracture4
Stage 3: Fractures
Stage 4: Site/concept
Stage 5: Edge/Cross connections
over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over
35
Stage 7: Surface manipulation (cut, weaved, pulled, bent, striated, collapsed, rippled, perforated)
1: Site
2: Adjacent Schools
3: Primary/Secondary Roads
4: External nodes
5: Internal nodes
6: Site connection lines
36
Stage 6: Overlap
program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program pro-
7: Ground>Under>Ground
8: Ground>Over>Ground
9: Program
10: Edge connections1(line)
11: Edge connections2(curve)
12: Edge connection2(curve)+extend
37
admin offices change room washroom library faith room theatre room music room dance studio weight and condition arts and crafts room language room culinary arts photography cafe atrium outdoor garden outdoor sport field
Stage 8: Program matrix
WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA
COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE
MUSIC ROOM
LANGUAGE ROOM
RECEPTION
CAFETERIA
DANCE STUDIO
STORAGE
ATRIUM
SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO
CULINARY ARTS STUDIO
THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM
LIBRARY
GAR. RM
FAITH ROOM
SHIPPING/ RECEIVING
LOADING AREA
Stage 9: Program infusion
Stage 10: Site Plan 38
Program1(Passive)
Atrium
Program2(Active)
Valley Entrances
Program3(Subtle)
Theatre
Service & Parking
Sports Arena
Interior Building Breakdown 39
WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA
COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE
MUSIC ROOM
LANGUAGE ROOM
RECEPTION
CAFETERIA
DANCE STUDIO
STORAGE
ATRIUM
SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO
CULINARY ARTS STUDIO
THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM
LIBRARY
GAR. RM
FAITH ROOM
SHIPPING/ RECEIVING
LOADING AREA
Section A
WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA
COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE
MUSIC ROOM
LANGUAGE ROOM
RECEPTION
CAFETERIA
DANCE STUDIO
WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA
STORAGE
COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE
ATRIUM
SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO
MUSIC ROOM
CULINARY ARTS STUDIO
THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM
LANGUAGE ROOM
RECEPTION
CAFETERIA
DANCE STUDIO
LIBRARY
GAR. RM
FAITH ROOM
STORAGE
SHIPPING/ RECEIVING
ATRIUM
SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO
LOADING AREA
CULINARY ARTS STUDIO
THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM
LIBRARY
GAR. RM
FAITH ROOM
SHIPPING/ RECEIVING
LOADING AREA
WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA
COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE
MUSIC ROOM
LANGUAGE ROOM
RECEPTION
CAFETERIA
DANCE STUDIO
STORAGE
ATRIUM
SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO
CULINARY ARTS STUDIO
THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM
LIBRARY
GAR. RM
FAITH ROOM
SHIPPING/ RECEIVING
LOADING AREA
Section B 40
B: Spatial Panorama cutting through atrium, entrance, and library
WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA
COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE
MUSIC ROOM
LANGUAGE ROOM
RECEPTION
CAFETERIA
DANCE STUDIO
STORAGE
ATRIUM
SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO
CULINARY ARTS STUDIO
ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM
A
B
THEATRE
LIBRARY
GAR. RM
FAITH ROOM
SHIPPING/ RECEIVING
LOADING AREA
41
North Elevation
South Elevation
West Elevation
East Elevation
42
Building Entrance
43
44
Baqa’a Community Centre 45
DUFFERIN GROVE COMMUNITY COMMON Course: Comprehensive Building Project ARC 2014YS (Winter Semester 2013) Professor: Maria Denegri (Denegri Bessai Studio) Master of Architecture (Year II - Advanced Placement) University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape & Design Project role: Project Architect
The interpretation of ‘community’ carries a significant amount of meaning within literature and architecture. As a word, it’s defined as “a social group of any size whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common culture.” With this consideration of common entities sharing spaces or ideologies, our design thesis was formed: A division of major programmatic building units closely attached or adjacent to one another altogether achieving unity in the context of a large public park space. By carrying forth the literal significance of community, where common entities share spaces and be unified, our design thesis was established. With the strategy to build three major cohesive building entities on site, creating unique interior spaces, and shaping new outdoor program spaces for all public users to utilize to the fullest, the new Dufferin Grove Community Centre not only carries a considerable amount of literal expression, but an architectural one as well.
Site Location
R
BLOO E YONG
GE
DUFFE
COLLE
RIN
City of Toronto
Site Plan
Dufferin Street & College Street West
1:2000
48
Dufferin Mall + Dufferin Grove Park
Parti
LOUNGE
LOUNGE
LOUNGE
LOUNGE
GYM
GYM
GYM
GYM
HALL
HALL
HALL
HALL
Common entities sharing space/ Common Grounds
Context Plan
Major Program Entities
Major Program Geometry Spread/ New Exterior Programs
1:1000
49
Program entities & Connectivity
4
2
7 8
3
1
5
6
9
12 11 13
10
14
1 LOUNGE 2 MAIN LOBBY 3 CAFE 4 SKATE CHANGE PARK 5 MALE CHANGEROOM 6 FEMALE CHANGEROOM 7 ZAMBONI 8 EAST LOBBY 9 SKATE PARK 10 MARKET PLACE 11 OUTDOOR PROJECTION SCREEN 12 MULTI PURPOSE GYM 13 OFFICE 14 EQUIPMENT ROOM 15 OUTDOOR THEATRE 16 MULTI PURPOSE HALL 17 STORAGE 18 MALE/FEMALE WASHROOM 19 RECEPTION 20 SOUTH LOBBY 21 LOADING DOCK 22 ATRIUM 23 PUBLIC MALE/FEMALE WASHROOM
17
22
19
15
23
21
18
20
16
N
Ground Floor Plan
1:1000
North Building Section
1:1000
Multi-Purpose Gym Section
1:1000 50
2
6 5 7
1 3
4
8
1 UPPER CAFE/LOUNGE 2 COMMON SPACE 3 STAFF OFFICES 4 STORAGE/OFFICE SPACE 5 MALE WASHROOM 6 FEMALE WASHROOM 7 MEETING SPACE 8 MEETING ROOM 9 MALE/FEMALE WASHROOM 10 MEETING ROOMS 11 PUBLIC GREENROOF
9
11 10
N
Second Floor Plan
1:1000
South Building Section
1:1000
Cross Section
1:1000
51
Exterior Perspective: South Building Threshold
Exterior Perspective: Entrance + Multi-purpose Gym + Multi-purpose Hall
52
Interior Perspective: Multi-purpose Gym
Interior Perspective: Entrance + Lounge + Cafe
53
BRUSH SEALS ALUMINIUM FLASHING
MECHANICAL PUMP FOR VENTILATION CONTROL
WEATHER MEMBRANE w/ PLYWOOD
STEEL BAR ANCHORED
ROOFING MESH GRAVEL
1 RIGID INSULATION AIR VAPOUR BARRIER
1
CAFE
POST + RAIL FRAMING OUTER GLAZING
RECEPTION
2 3
LOUNGE
DOUBLE GLAZING MULLION SUPPORT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Exterior Feature Wall: Half Pipe Wall HARDWOOD LOUVRES
4
OPERABLE WINDOW
FLASHING
MULTIPURPOSE GYM
STEEL STUD
GRILLS TO INTAKE AIR
2
STONE TILE
STEEL SUPPORT
5
SPANDREL PANEL EXTERIOR METAL CLADDING
SKATE PARK
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
6
CONCRETE PAVERS AGGREGATE IN OPENINGS BEDDING COURSE STEEL COLUMN
STONE OPEN GRADE
7
EARTH
STONE CLADDING
FARMERS MARKET
8
EFeature Wall: Gym Wall/Half Pipe Wall
PAR TI AL PLAN
1 Parapet w/ Ventilation 2 Double Skin Facade 3 Dropped Ceiling Exposed Structure 4 Steel Plates & Mullions Hold Glazing 5 Interior Louvres Controlled Mechanically 6 Interlocking Pavement
1 PARAPET w/ VENTILATION 2 DOUBLE SKIN FACADE | SC ALE 1:50 3 DROP CEILING EXPOSED STRUCTURE 4 STEEL PLATES AND MULLIONS HOLD GLAZING 5 INTERIOR LOUVRES CONTROLLED MECHANICALLY 6 INTERLOCKING PAVEMENT 7 LOUNGE AREA 8 FOUNDATION
FLOOR TILES
7 Lounge Area 8 Foundation
1
Double Skin: Complete Assembly & Materials
by: alvaro quispe | instructor: maria denegri | arc_2014YS: architectural design studio IV | comprehensive building project 03.18.2013
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
MECHANICS TO LOUVRES AND OPERABLE WINDOW
ARC 2014YS - CC 3: Conceptual Detail
M A R I A
D E N E G R I
F A R A H K A B I R UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
DETAIL WALL SECTION SCALE 1: 20 54
PLYWOOD SHEATHING w/ WEATHER BARRIER
RIGID INSULATION FOOTING
REINFORCED CONCR STEEL REBAR
DRAINAGE PIPE
ARC 2014YS - CC 3: Conceptual Detail
M A R I A
D E N E G R I
F A R A H K A B I R UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
PARAPET - DOUBLE SKIN - FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE 1: 10
W/ DRIP EDGE ON 2 - 13 EXTERIOR PLYWOOD ROOF MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION
1
2
3
6
3
PARAPET DETAIL
2
WALL DETAIL
lateral structural steel supports & connections welded onto hss
4
5
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
6
7
10
window top: rigid insulation completed with z-bars, clips, metal cap, and mullion roof: membrane + rigid insulation + plywood sheathing + asphalt 8 mechanical + electrical + plumbing
by: Alvaro Quispe | instructor: Ivan Saleff | arc_2045H: building science-materials & construction II | major project | 04.01.2013
1 Parapet 2 Timber Glulam Structure Exposed 3 Vision + Spandrel Panels 4 Metal Cladding 5 Concrete Wall 6 Concrete Quarter Pipe 7 Multipurpose Gym 8 Wood Flooring
2
Gym Wall Section: Complete Assembly & Materials
55
URBAN PILLOW: DORMITORY Course: Architectural Design Studio IV - Sleep Professor: Natalie Fizer Master of Architecture (Year II - Advanced Placement) University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape & Design
Over the course of a semester, students were to develop, research, and frame a final dormatory building project all influenced by the studio’s core subject: sleep. Through case studies of buildings associated with sleep, as well as research dedicated to sleep as a component of program and significance in time cycles, the final project in this studio was realized.
program
core
skin: air light shade enclosure structure
program
1_single
program
core1
program
program
core2
program
2_split
module program
core1
program
program
core2
program
core: physically non-active program + physically active program
3_stack
program program
c o r e (1+2)
program
program
4_merge
conceptual module combinations
model perspective 58
air natural light artificial light enclosure air private natural light public artificial light enclosure private public
air artificial light natural light no light air enclosure artificial light napping natural light public no light enclosure napping public
air natural light flora/nature no enclosure air public natural light
air natural light artificial light enclosure air public natural light
flora/nature no enclosure public
artificial light enclosure public
7.5m
9.6m
16m
dorm units
nap unit
outdoor/open space
air natural light artificial light enclosure air public natural light physical activities artificial light
air natural artificia enclosu air public natural
artificia enclosu public
enclosure public physical activities
12m
21.5m
classroom
swimming pool/gym
Program Sections operable window bed private study sliding door operable window hallway seating bed view to study outside private sliding door hallway seating view to outside
dorm units
hallway seating open napping enclosed napping view to outside hallway seating
seating/napping pathway landscape open to outside seating/napping
open napping enclosed napping view to outside
pathway landscape open to outside
nap unit
outdoor/open space
operable windows hallway 20 seat classroom
cardio area weight area lane pool
half wa view to 200 pu
operable windows hallway 20 seat classroom
cardio area weight area lane pool
half wa view to 200 pu
classroom
Program Plans 59
swimming pool/gym
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Site Plan
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Site: College Street and Spadina Avenue (Toronto)
60
Ground Floor
8
2 5 3 7
4 3 1
6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1
atrium auditorium swimming pool napping study classroom washroom outdoor space
6
7
3
4
4 5
2 7
1st Floor Plan
2nd Floor Plan
61
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
change rm outdoor gym classroom public study event space cafe
a
a
Section a-a
62
b
63
b
Section b-b
West Elevation
64
South-West Perspective
65
WZMH ARCHITECTS ST. THOMAS CONSOLIDATED COURTHOUSE WZMH Principal: Nicola Casciato & Hatice Yazar WZMH Associate: Jee-Young Kang Date: Jun 2010 - Jan 2011
Q-SHIP TOWER WZMH Principal: Medhat Abdou WZMH Associate: Stephen Hancock Date: Sept 2011 - Oct 2011
NORTH YORK CITY CENTRE - FOOD COURT RENOVATION WZMH Principal: Medhat Abdou WZMH Associate: Stephen Hancock Date: May 2012 - Aug 2012
68
ST. THOMAS CONSOLIDATED COURTHOUSE Constructed within a residential neighborhood in St. Thomas Ontario, 1853, the St. Thomas (Elgin County) Courthouse is a provincially designated heritage building. With respect to project’s premise of being a preservation and expansion project, the design proposal was focused on three tasks: preserving and restoring the Elgin County Courthouse and the former Land Registry Office, as well as providing a significant but subtle architectural addition. Having an established arrangement of a tripartite portico entry, the new addition anchors the existing building’s backdrop with its symmetrical extension to the east and west. Within the design of the building, a three storey atrium space was created to act as a spatial separation between the existing building and new addition. During this portion of the project I was given the opportunity to work on the interior design of the atrium space and public corridors, specifically materials arrangement, application, scale, order, and colour renderings for final presentation.
69
Central Atrium (Courtesy of Norm Li)
Autrium
Public Corridors (Courtesy of Norm Li)
70
Interior Atrium Space (South Face) 16
17
19
27
GL 1 Sandblasted Glass·6mm, Tempered, Sandblasted·Sidelights · 16 GL 2 Safety Glass · 12mm Laminated and Guard rails · 17 MET 1 Metal Trims · Interior Metal Accents and Transitional Strips · 19 WD1 Wood Veneer Panels · Rift Cut Red Oak · 27 GBP Gypsum Board Painted · Paint · Interior Walls · 28
28
Public Corridors 16
17
20
25
GL 1 Sandblasted Glass·6mm, Tempered, Sandblasted · Sidelights · 16 GL 2 Safety Glass · 12mm Laminated and Guard rails · 17 STN 1 Limestone 300x600, White Sands, Honed · Public Circulation Wall and Column Finish · 20 TEX 1 Acoustical Wall Covering · Courtrooms and Public Waiting Areas · 25 MET-2 · Stainless Steel - XL Blend ‘S’ Finish · Elevator Doors · 29
29
71
72
Q-SHIP TOWER The Q-Ship Tower was a unique proposal in that it had to be completed and submitted within 7 days. With the premise that the tower would be made for Qatar Navigation Company, opportunity had risen to create a distinguished landmark that would utilize its immediate surroundings. Fluid forms were the inspiration for the design of the building, including, billowing sails, water motion, and sand dunes. In addition, the outer skin design obtains a cultural appearance of a cloak wrapping around the building. Within this short scheduled proposal, I was given opportunity to work directly with Associate Principal, Stephen Hancock, who led the design and team of the Q-Ship Tower. I was given the responsibility for all model tasks including, massing, concept iterations, detailed facade designs, and final elevation renderings for presentation.
Site: Qatar, Doha
73
day 1
day 2
day 3
day 4
day 5
day 6
day 7
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
1.1
2.1
3.1
4.1
5.1
6.1
7.1
3D Model iterations by Alvaro Quispe | Plan Sketches by Stephen Hancock above
74
day 8
Rendering Courtesy of Q-Studio
75
3.0 residential facade system
2.0 facade pattern
Exploded Axonometric View by Alvaro Quispe
1.0 podium facade system
76
Sketches by Steve Hancock
Elevation renderings by Alvaro Quispe N
W
E
77
S
78
NORTH YORK CITY CENTRE - FOOD COURT RENOVATION A small project, nonetheless very experiential. This project involved many tasks from beginning to end including: Photography & documentation of existing site, measured drawings, technical drawings, coordination with all consultants, issue for permit, tender, addendum, and construction.
79
New Central Food Court
80
5150 YONGE STREET TORONTO, ONTARIO
Drawing set sample: Proposed Floor Plan
81
New Floor Paving
82
5150 YONGE STREET TORONTO, ONTARIO
Drawing set sample: Floor Paving Plan
83
Half wall detail
84
85
Trellis detail
86
BBB ARCHITECTS MONCTON CENTRAL SPORTS + ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE BBB Principal: Greg Alexander Senior Designer: Justin Perdue Date: May 2014 - August 2014
Q-SHIP TOWER BBB Principal: Greg Alexander Senior Designer: Ryan Tait Date: May 2014 - August 2014
87
88
MONCTON CENTRAL SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE
At BBB Architects the main project I was involved in was the
Moncton Central Sports & Entertainment Centre, a stadium competition and master plan project. Using Revit Architecture our team focused on preliminary design and schematic design where I was responsible for designing and producing architectural illustration, diagrams, and final renderings for client presentations.
89
Master Plan
90
Aerial View - Plaza
91
14 DUNCAN STREET TORONTO, ON M5H 3G8
Y 1
TEL (416) 591 8999
1
2
6763
3
9000
6
33400
R5
R4
R3
A-401
26800
R6
1200
7
6764
R7
FAX (416) 591 9087
8
7300
R8 7071 BAYERS ROAD, SUITE 5007 HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, B3L 2C2
A1
TEL (902) 422 4587
CCC +/- 0
11500
RETAIL 3750 SF
VESTIBULE 1070 SF
RETAIL 3760 SF
BRICK
BB
150 TRUMBUL STREET, 3RD FLOOR HARTFORD, CT 06103 USA TEL
SS FAM. WR 90 SF
STAIR A
FAM. WR 100 SF
P.C.
AA
R9
STAIR B
WOMENS WR 510 SF
MENS WR 480 SF
CONCESSION 600 SF
SUITE ENTRY 390 SF
CONCESSION 600 SF
UP
SUITE/VIP ENTRANCE
FAMILY WR 110 SF
STOR
WOMENS WASHROOM 650 SF
MENS WR 610 SF 4793
BRICK
R10
7402 CONCOURSE
R1 C
FFF
GRASS
CONCRETE PAVERS
ELEC
ELEC
21168
R2
P.C.
CONCRETE PAVERS
LOBBY 860 SF
Maricor 77 Vaughan Harvey Blvd, Suite 200 Moncton, NB E1C 0K2 Bus: (506) 857-8880 Fax: (506) 859-8393 www.mcw.com
POTENTIAL LOCATION OF TEMPORARY GRANDSTAND
B
TT 200 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 7th FLOOR TORONTO, ON M5H 3C6 TEL (416) 477 5832
UU
VV
2 BLOOR STREET EAST, SUITE 2100 TORONTO, ON M4W 1A8 TEL (416) 920-5100
FAX (416) 922-8768
11288
P.C.
4420
TICKETING 550 SF
4420
WW
77 ROONEY CRESCENT MONCTON, NB E1E 4M4 TEL (506) 858 7180
OFFICE
FAX (506) 858 0742
D WOMENS WR 690 SF
XX
10300
MENS WR 510 SF
P.C.
CONCOURSE 43040 SF
YY
POTENTIAL LOCATION OF TEMPORARY EXTERIOR NHL-SIZE ICE SURFACE
10300
EQ
E CONCESSION 720 SF
2
1
CONCESSION 710 SF
A-402
A-402
1
A-301
ZZ
EQ
X
P.C.
F
PRE-FUNCTION SPACE 6050 SF
10300
P.C.
MENS WR 510 SF
AAA
CONCOURSE
-500
BBB
WOMEN WR 700 SF
G 4420
GGG
9.00°
11288
4420
WOMEN WR
FUNCTION SPACE B 2120 SF
18 .00 ° 18 .00°
P DN RAM 12 1:
R20
FIRST AID 230 SF 9.00°
FUNCTION SPACE A 6760 SF
CONCESSION 540 SF
HHH MEN WR
RAMP DN 1:12
CONCESSION 550 SF
H
FAMILY WR JANITOR 100 SF 110 SF
4793
0° 8.0 °1 18.00
WOMENS WR 530 SF
WR
R11 1
9132
WR BASKETBALL DRESSING ROOM
J
MEETING ROOM A 200 SF
R19 WHIRLPOOL 110 SF
DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS
27425
R18 L
PLAYER LOUNGE 400 SF
10790
OFFICE 180 SF
R12
PROMO 80 SF
SERVICE CORRIDOR 850 SF
WARMING PANTRY 1110 SF
KITCHEN STAIR C
F&B STORAGE
ZAMBONI
OFFICE 120 SF
DRESSING ROOM 1 740 SF
LIQUOR STORAGE 170 SF
STORAGE 840 SF
MEETING ROOM C 330 SF
Keyplan:
VISITING TEAM DRESSING ROOM 610 SF
CLINIC 480 SF
DRESSING ROOM 2 730 SF
DRESSING ROOM 3 720 SF
6258 STAFF CHANGING 250 SF PLAYER CHANGING 360 SF
MEETING ROOM B 220 SF RAMP DN 1:12
MANAGER OFFICE
CLINIC STORAGE 110 SF HOCKEY DRESSING ROOM Option Conflict SF
E
-400
EQUIP. ROOM 1000 SF
SAUNA 90 SF
CATERING 550 SF
Date
THE DRAWING AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE THE PROPERTY OF MADISON SQUARE GARDEN, L.P. AND CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THERE BE ANY UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION, IN ANY FORM.
WR OFFICIALS OFFICIALS
Date 1
Description
CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
FUNCTION SPACE C 2510 SF
STORAGE 130 SF
SKATE SHARPENING 120 SF EQUIP. MANAGER 120 SF
Revision 1
No.
GREEN ROOM 920 SF
UP
OPS STORAGE 2960 SF
ICE PLANT 1210 SF
GARBAGE / RECYCLING 460 SF
R13 WARNING: It is a violation of the law Drawn: for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, to Author alter this item/document in any way.
LAUNDRY
SECURITY
VIDEO/MEETING ROOM 250 SF
DRESSING ROOM 4 670 SF
Checked:
Checker Date initiated:
OFFICE 170 SF
OFFICE 170 SF
OFFICE 170 SF
28-MAY-2014
M 2 A-401
4 A-301
4
LEVEL 1
R14
R15
O Brisbin Brook Beynon, Architects, 2009 C SCI Architect, P.C., 2009 O Sheet. No. C
RAMP UP
Ground Floor Plan
R16
Scale:
1 : 200 Project No.
1402
92
A-200
12/08/2014 9:06:39 AM
Sheet Name:
R17
Plaza - Exterior Entrance
93
Typical Suite 14 DUNCAN STREET TORONTO, ON M5H 3G8
1
1
2
3
6
A-401
R5
R4
R3
R6
Y
7
R7
TEL (416) 591 8999
8
FAX (416) 591 9087
R8
A1 7071 BAYERS ROAD, SUITE 5007 HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, B3L 2C2
SERVICE RM
TEL (902) 422 4587
KITCHEN
RESTAURANT
WOMENS WR BAR
BB MENS WR
150 TRUMBUL STREET, 3RD FLOOR HARTFORD, CT 06103 USA
JAN.
B
TEL
R9 ELEC
ELEC
AA
AA
R2
Maricor
GROUP SALES
77 Vaughan Harvey Blvd, Suite 200 Moncton, NB E1C 0K2 Bus: (506) 857-8880 Fax: (506) 859-8393 www.mcw.com
GROUP SALES
200 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 7th FLOOR TORONTO, ON M5H 3C6
SUITE 12
SUITE 1
TEL (416) 477 5832
VIP BALCONY
R10
SUITE 13
SUITE 2
R1 C
2 BLOOR STREET EAST, SUITE 2100 TORONTO, ON M4W 1A8
SUITE 3
TEL (416) 920-5100
SUITE 14
FAX (416) 922-8768
MENS WR
SUITE 15
SUITE 4
77 ROONEY CRESCENT MONCTON, NB E1E 4M4
WOMENS WR
TEL (506) 858 7180
D
FAX (506) 858 0742
4
1
SUITE 5
6
A-700
SUITE 16 A-700
3
5
SUITE 17
SUITE 6 DN
2
E
A-401
2
SUITE 7
X
1
MEDIA
A-402
A-301
CLUB SEATING SHOWN HATCHED
2
A-402
X
F SUITE 8
SUITE 18
SUITE 9
SUITE 19
G SUITE 10
SUITE 20
SUITE 21
SUITE 11
H R11
R20 HC SEATING
HC PLATFORM
No.
J
SERVICE
HOSPITALITY ROOM
A/V ROOM
Description
Date
CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
SERVICE
DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS
R19 WOMENS WR
THE DRAWING AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE THE PROPERTY OF MADISON SQUARE GARDEN, L.P. AND CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THERE BE ANY UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION, IN ANY FORM.
R12
GROUP SALES MENS WR
MENS WR
WOMENS WR
WILL CALL 110 SF
STAFF LOCKERS
W/R 180 SF
RECEPTION 310 SF
BB ELECTRICAL ROOM
W/R 180 SF
MECHANICAL ROOM
R18
CONFERECE ROOM 360 SF
PRINTER KITCHEN 40 SF 190 SF
UP UP SERVER ROOM 70 SF FILE STORAGE 190 SF
ADMIN OFFICES 5150 SF
PANTRY 1190 SF
Keyplan:
MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE 180 SF 180 SF 180 SF 180 SF 230 SF
R13
L WARNING: It is a violation of the law Drawn: for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, to Author alter this item/document in any way. Checked:
Checker Date initiated:
M R16
4
R15
R14
Sheet Name:
LEVEL 2 AND MEZZ.
4 A-301
1
Level 2 1 : 200
Scale:
1 : 200 Project No.
1402
C Brisbin Brook Beynon, Architects, 2009 O C SCI Architect, P.C., 2009 O Sheet. No.
A-201
12/08/2014 9:07:03 AM
R17
94
VIP Mezzanine Y 1
1
2
6763
3
9000
A-401
26800
6
33400
R5
R4
R3 30756
R6
1200
7
6764
R7
8
7300
R8
A1
+/- 0
11500
RETAIL 3750 SF
VESTIBULE 1070 SF
RETAIL 3760 SF
BRICK
BB B 34101
FAM. WR 90 SF
P.C.
P.C.
AA
FUTURE COMMERCIAL OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING
STAIR A
R9
STAIR B
CONCRETE PAVERS
ELEC
ELEC WOMENS WR 510 SF
21168
R2
FAM. WR 100 SF
MENS WR 480 SF
CONCESSION 600 SF
SUITE ENTRY 390 SF
CONCESSION 600 SF
UP
SUITE/VIP ENTRANCE
FAMILY WR 110 SF
STOR
WOMENS WASHROOM 650 SF
MENS WR 610 SF 4793
C
BRICK
R10
7402 CONCOURSE
R1
CONCRETE PAVERS
LOBBY 860 SF
11288
P.C.
4420
TICKETING 550 SF
4420
SUITE/VIP DROP-OFF OFFICE
D WOMENS WR 690 SF 10300
MENS WR 510 SF
P.C.
CONCOURSE 43040 SF
POTENTIAL LOCATION OF TEMPORARY E NHL-SIZE ICE SURFACE
10300
EQ
E
X
CONCESSION 720 SF
2
1
CONCESSION 710 SF
A-402
A-402
2 EQ
A-301
P.C.
F
PRE-FUNCTION SPACE 6050 SF
10300
P.C.
CONCOURSE
-500
MENS WR 510 SF
WOMEN WR 700 SF
G FUNCTION SPACE B 2120 SF
4420
9.00°
11288
4420
DN RAMP 1:12
18.0 0°
18.00°
FAMILY WR JANITOR 100 SF 110 SF
FIRST AID 230 SF 9.00°
FUNCTION SPACE A 6760 SF
CONCESSION 540 SF
RAMP DN 1:12
0° 18.0
R20
4793
18.00°
WOMENS WR 530 SF
CONCESSION 550 SF
H
WR
R11
9132
WR BASKETBALL DRESSING ROOM
GREEN ROOM 920 SF
UP
FUNCTION SPACE C 2510 SF
STORAGE 130 SF
J WR OFFICIALS OFFICIALS
SKATE SHARPENING 120 SF EQUIP. MANAGER 120 SF
R19 WHIRLPOOL 110 SF 27425
HOCKEY DRESSING ROOM Option Conflict SF
SAUNA 90 SF
R18 L
PLAYER LOUNGE 400 SF
10790
OFFICE 180 SF
OFFICE 170 SF
OFFICE 120 SF VISITING TEAM DRESSING ROOM 610 SF
CLINIC 480 SF
DRESSING ROOM 2 730 SF
DRESSING ROOM 3 720 SF OPS STORAGE 2960 SF
ICE PLANT 1210 SF
GARBAGE / RECYCLING 460 SF
LAUNDRY
SECURITY
VIDEO/MEETING ROOM 250 SF
DRESSING ROOM 4 670 SF
OFFICE 170 SF
2 A-401
4
4
R14
R15 RAMP UP
R16
A-301
95
SERVICE CORRIDOR 850 SF
WARMING PANTRY 1110 SF
STAIR C DRESSING ROOM 1 740 SF
M R17
R12
PROMO 80 SF
ZAMBONI
6258
OFFICE 170 SF
E
RAMP DN 1:12 MANAGER OFFICE KITCHEN F&B STORAGE
STAFF CHANGING 250 SF PLAYER CHANGING 360 SF
CATERING 550 SF
-400
EQUIP. ROOM 1000 SF CLINIC STORAGE 110 SF
R13
LIQUOR STORAGE 170 SF
STORAG 840 SF
96
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN LUXURY LOUNGE & BAR PROPOSAL
The Madison Square Garden Luxury Lounge & Bar Proposal is ongoing small
conceptual project. Working closely with a Principal and Senior Designer, I was responsible for producing floor plan and section renderings that illustrated new concepts for the project, including space, light, materials, and atmosphere.
97
Ground Floor
2nd Floor
98
3rd Floor
4th Floor
99
Concept A - Section
Concept A - Perspective Section
100
Concept B - Section
Concept B - Perspective Section
101
ALVARO
QUISPE | PORTFOLIO
M.Arch | 416.878.7189 | quispe.c.alvaro@gmail.com