Alvaro Quispe | Portfolio 15'

Page 1

ALVARO

QUISPE | PORTFOLIO

M.Arch | 416.878.7189 | quispe.c.alvaro@gmail.com


ALVARO

QUISPE

alvaro.quispe@mail.utoronto.ca C: 416.878.7189 | H: 416.466.5999

69 Boston Avenue Toronto, ON, M4M 2T8

OBJECTIVE Graduate seeking full-time employment in an established firm to continue career in the architectural field. EDUCATION Master of Architecture (M.Arch.), University of Toronto | December 2014 Bachelor of Architectural Science (B.Arch.Sci.), Ryerson University | June 2010 SKILLS o o o o

Excellent in both manual and digital tools such as sketching, drafting, physical model making, digital art illustrations, photography, 3D model production, and parametric model production. Ability to take leadership within a team setting, creating a cohesive unit for all group members to participate directly in the design process and production of architecture. Fluent in both Spanish and English. proficient knowledge in a variety of computer programs in both PCs and MACs, including: • • • •

Autodesk AutoCAD 2014 / AutoCAD Autodesk Revit Architecture 2013 Autodesk 3ds Max 2012 Rhinoceros Nurbs Modeling 5.0

3D Modeling

• • • •

Grasshopper 3D (Build 0.9) Google Sketchup Pro 2013 Adobe Creative Suite 6 (Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, and Bridge) Microsoft Office 2013 (Outlook, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, etc)

WORK EXPERIENCE (September 2014 - December 2014) John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture · Landscape · Design. University of Toronto, Canada. Design Studio 1 Teaching Assistant o Assisted in workshops, tutorials, management, and critiques for an undergraduate studio class of 20 students. o Responsible for teaching students manual tools and digital software programs in architecture such as: Adobe Creative Suite 6, AutoCAD, Rhinoceros 3D, and Sketchup Pro. (May 2014 - August 2014) BBB Architects, Toronto, Canada. Designer o o

Assisted in projects phases including, but not limited to: preliminary design, schematic design. Responsible for completing 3D models in Revit, followed by the production of architectural diagrams, illustrations, and renderings for presentations.

(September 2012 - May 2013 | September 2013 - Current) John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture · Landscape · Design. University of Toronto, Canada. Digital Fabrication Laboratory Assistant o Assisted in workshops, tutorials, and management for the school’s digital fabrication laboratory. o Responsible for teaching students software and setup of digital fabrication tools, specifically laser cutting systems.


WORK EXPERIENCE (CONT’D) (September 2010 - September 2012) WZMH Architects, Toronto, Canada. Junior Designer o o

Assisted in projects phases including, but not limited to: preliminary design, schematic design, design development, and working drawings. Responsible for creating complete 3D models, renderings, presentation booklets, SPA documents, site documentation, and consultant coordination.

(May 2008/2009 - August 2008/2009 | May 2010 - September 2010 | May 2013 - September 2013) Isosceles Design/Build, Toronto, Canada. Draftsman o Assisted Partner-in-Charge with the design process of small mixed-used projects throughout Toronto. o Responsible for producing permit drawings, site documentation, and consultant coordination. o Collaborated with Partner-in-Charge and team with on site construction duties such as underpinning, wood framing, window and door installation, concrete formwork, rebar placement, and pouring. ACHIEVEMENTS o o o o o o

University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of A·L·D. Tactical Resilience. (A.Quispe, Exhibit Assistant Designer). September - November, 2014 Ryerson University, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture, and Science Dean’s List 2009-2010 Canadian Architecture Students Association (CASA). National Portfolio 2010. (A.Quispe, Graphic Designer) City of Toronto: 2010 Ryerson University 2009. 325 Magazine. (A.Quispe, Graphic Designer) City of Toronto: 2009 Ryerson University 2008. 16 Cities: Waterfronts Around the World. (A.Quispe, Ed.) City of Toronto: 2008 Ontario Scholar Award, Riverdale Collegiate Institute, 2006

VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE o o o o

University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of A·L·D. Architectural Representation 1. (A.Quispe, Guest Reviewer) December 2014 AIAS Ryerson University Chapter, Forum 2010: Action|Reaction. City of Toronto, Event Volunteer 2010-2011 AIAS Ryerson University Chapter, Forum 2008: Energy. City of Denver, Event Volunteer 2008-2009 Canadian Architecture Students Association (CASA) Ryerson University, Internal Representative 2009 - 2010

REFERENCES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST


CONTENTS

4


RECIPROCITY: MICRO HAVENS

7

M.Arch: Architecture Thesis 2014

HENRY MOORE WATERFRONT SCULPTURAL CENTRE

25

B.Arch: Year III Studio

BAQA’A COMMUNITY CENTRE

33

B.Arch: Architecture Thesis 2006

DUFFERIN GROVE COMMUNITY COMMON

47

M.Arch: Year II Comprehensive Studio

URBAN PILLOW: DORMITORY

57

M.Arch: Year III Design Option Studio

WZMH ARCHITECTS St. Thomas Consolidated Courthouse

Q-Ship Tower

73

North York City Centre - Food Court Renovation

79

BBB ARCHITECTS Moncton Central Sports & Entertainment Centre

69

Madison Square Garden: Luxury Lounge & Bar Concept Proposal

5

89

97



RECIPROCITY: MICRO HAVENS Course: M.Arch Thesis, Fall 2014 Professor: Josemaria de Churtichaga Master of Architecture (Year III - Advanced Placement) University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape & Design

Reciprocity, known as the mutual exchange amongst two or more parties is the foundation of human development. On a global scale the thought of reciprocity or reciprocal exchange should be a key component in travel especially in emerging countries, but this is a fallacy. As it currently stands the spectrum of travel contains two leaders: Big Tourism and Home Stay where the first dominates in its position of economic commerce while the second dominates is its position of reciprocity. Distinctively, Big Tourism leads travellers to easy, reliable, and recognizable expeditions but is a highly scripted and repetitive experience. The Home Stay leads more adventuresome travellers to a less scripted and more cultural expedition by directly having the traveller live under a local’s roof. Although this provides great reciprocal experience between local and traveller, many difficulties are present such as with privacy and comfort. This leads to question: can a new system can be created to harness both positive ends of these types of travels? Can a new proposal for travel within emerging countries be created for the ultimate reciprocal exchange in culture and economics for both the traveller and the local? Using Peru as its area of study, this thesis explores architecture’s potential to converge with technology and be a threshold to directly merge these two types of travel into a third type, ensuring the ultimate reciprocal exchange for all involved. Through the creation of prototypical Micro Havens, locals will be able to fashion secure, comfortable, and centrally located places for tourists to stay, allowing maximum exposure to the surrounding community and environment. This project seeks to be a catalyst for resiliency among communities and at the same time create a outstanding experience for the global traveller who desires cultural experiences, education, and social interactions.


0.0

INTRODUCTION

0.4

Scripted Experiences Travel Type 1

But I find it funny how people visit Peru, because the first thing that everyone asks me is: how was Machu Picchu and what website/agency is most reliable and convenient to get there. I find my suggestions are often overlook in favor of packaged trip or expedia. On the surface everyone seems like they had a great trip as most say “Machu Picchu was amazing, the hotels were comfortable, the nightlife was very fun, and the Inca burger was delicious.” But for me it seems all too familiar, because everyone has the same story,

UCTION

ciprocity

efinition

By definition reciprocity means the mutual exchange between two parties.1 To put this word into real context it can be said that every day and everywhere there is an interactive exchange amongst people. Like a person at a bar. In this event many things happen, for one your away from home, and in another physical space and place where light, materials, and the overall architecture are key in creating a comfortable atmosphere, and most

0.0 scripted INTRODUCTION the same package, the same repeated experience.2 And with But I find it funny how people visit Peru, because the first thing that that it seems odd to me that with this type of the travel, big tourism, everyone it is asks me is: how was Machu Picchu and what website/agency is a rarity for anyone to tell a story of0.4 having anScripted intimateExperiences experience, a most real reliable and convenient to get there. I find my suggestions are often interaction, a true reciprocal exchange with Peruvian culture and locals. overlook in favor of packaged trip or expedia. On the surface everyone But for me it seems all too familiar, because everyone has the same story, seems like they had a great trip as most say “Machu Picchu was amazing, Travel Type 1 the same package, the same repeated scripted experience. And with the hotels were comfortable, the nightlife was very fun, and the Inca burger that it seems odd to me that with this type of the travel, big tourism, was it is delicious.” a rarity for anyone to tell a story of having an intimate experience, a real interaction, a true reciprocal exchange with Peruvian culture and locals.But for me it seems all too familiar, because everyone has the same story,

importantly mutual exchange occurs as embodied in this photo. In this moment between you or this case the man and the bartender, something beautiful happens, there is an exchange of money for a delicious drink, 2 2 there is an0.0 exchange of ideas, an exchange of stories, 0.0 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Butinterests, I find itdifferences, funny But how I findpeople it funny visithow Peru, people because visitthe Peru, firstbecause thing that the first thing the thatsame package, the the samesame package, repeated the scripted same repeated experience. scripted And experience. with And with and culture, which is extraordinary for by the endeveryone of this experience both asks me everyone is: how asks was Machu me is: how Picchu wasand Machu whatPicchu website/agency and what is website/agency thatisit seems odd that to me it seems that with odd to thisme type that ofwith the travel, this type bigoftourism, the travel, it isbig tourism, it is parties benefit parties fromScripted this mutual exchange, this two 0.4 and bothScripted 0.4grow Experiences Experiences most reliable andmost convenient reliable to and getconvenient there. I find to my get suggestions there. I find are my suggestions often are often a rarity for anyone a rarity to tellfora anyone story of to having tell a an story intimate of having experience, an intimate a real experience, a real way street. This is reciprocity.

Travel Type 1

1 | Reciprocity

INTRODUCTION

0.2

Reciprocity + Tourism

INTRODUCTION

0.5

Less Scripted Experiences Travel Type 1

2 | Scripted Experience

10

0.0

0.0

overlook in favoroverlook of packaged in favor tripoforpackaged expedia. trip On the or expedia. surface everyone On the surface everyone interaction, a true interaction, reciprocalaexchange true reciprocal with Peruvian exchangeculture with Peruvian and locals. culture and locals. seems like they had seems a great like they trip as had most a great say trip “Machu as most Picchu saywas “Machu amazing, Picchu was amazing, But for me it seems But all fortoo me familiar, it seemsbecause all too familiar, everyone because has theeveryone same story, has the same story, Travel Type 1 the hotels were comfortable, the hotels were thecomfortable, nightlife wasthe verynightlife fun, andwas thevery Incafun, burger and the Inca burger the same package, the same the same package, repeated the same scripted repeated experience. scripted Andexperience. with And with was delicious.” was delicious.” that it seems odd that to me it seems that with odd to thisme type that ofwith the travel, this type bigoftourism, the travel, it isbig tourism, it is a rarity for anyone a rarity to tellfora anyone story of to having tell a an story intimate of having experience, an intimate a real experience, a real But for me it seems But all fortoo me familiar, it seemsbecause all too familiar, everyone because has theeveryone same story, has the same story, interaction, a true interaction, reciprocal aexchange true reciprocal with Peruvian exchange culture with Peruvian and locals. culture and locals.

10

And with this focus in mind I began to think about how reciprocity or reciprocal exchange is embodied on a global scale such as with tourism, where people who are passionate about travelling exchange wealth for the opportunity to go away from home to another country, another physical space and place, to learn about people’s landscapes, cultures, and locales.

0.0

INTRODUCTION

0.9

Travel Spectrum

the same package, the same repeated scripted ex that it seems odd to me that with this type of the tra a rarity for anyone to tell a story of having an intima interaction, a true reciprocal exchange with Peruvia But for me it seems all too familiar, because everyon the same package, the same repeated scripted ex that it seems odd to me that with this type of the tra a rarity for anyone to tell a story of having an intima interaction, a true reciprocal exchange with Peruvian

But for the more adventuresome who want authentic foods, o festivals or events that I know of and been too, I tell them go ou to see the Condor versus the Bull festival, or Moray where th locals folk dance, or try a piranha from the rainforest. But look these photos, I think about how these so called “authentic ex

11

So looking at this spectrum of travel, we have big tourism on one end, where it is safe, reliable/convenient, easy but concentrates money to the few and is a highly scripted experience lacking reciprocal exchange with local culture. On the other side, we find the Home Stay where there is reciprocal exchange, but money is being distributed to too few families, it’s not as comfortable in terms of privacy and freedoms because you are in someone’s house, and accessibility or ease to go on this type of travel

involves many background checks and references. Looking at the middle of this spectrum, I could not help but feel there was a void to be filled. I started to question whether it was possible to create a system, revolving around a specific space, where the best of both worlds can be had, with the ultimate result of creating reciprocal exchange between travellers and hosts.

5

10

10

11

12

BIG TOURISM

global travel

cons: · concentrates money to the few (more affluent community) · highly scripted (not intimate)

1.1 | Global Tourism

11

20

6

5 | Travel Spectrum 7

8

HOME STAY pros: · safe · reliable · easy

reciprocal exchange: · distribute wealth, experience, and culture to the many

pros: · undisguised experience

cons: · money to too few (one family)

(less scripted)

· not as comfortable

· cultural immersion · inexpensive (cheap)

(lack of privacy and freedom) · harder to access (rules and regulations)

21


r the more adventuresome who want authentic foods, or seek real als or events that I know of and been too, I tell them go outside Cusco the Condor versus the Bull festival, or Moray where thousands of folk dance, or try a piranha from the rainforest. But looking back at photos, I think about how these so called “authentic experiences”

0.0 INTRODUCTION But for the more adventuresome who want authentic foods, or seek real are actually not authentic at all, if we think of authenticity as experiencing festivals or events that I know of and been too, I tell them go outside Cusco some kind of ancient or untouched being there and taking 0.5 culture. Just by Less Scripted to see the Condor versus the Bull festival, or Moray where thousands of photos I, along with every other traveller, have touched the untouched and Experiences locals folk dance, or try a piranha from the rainforest. But looking back at thus a fallacy is acknowledged. these photos, I think about how these so called “authentic experiences” Travel Type 1

0.0

INTRODUCTION

0.6

Globalization

or seek real are actually not areauthentic actually not at all, authentic if we think at all, of authenticity if we think ofasauthenticity experiencing as experiencing utside Cusco some kind of ancient some kind or untouched of ancient or culture. untouched Just byculture. being there Just by and being taking there and taking housandsphotos of I, alongphotos with every I, along other with traveller, every other havetraveller, touched the haveuntouched touched the anduntouched and king backthus at a fallacy is thus acknowledged. a fallacy is acknowledged. xperiences”

are actually not authentic at all, if we think of authenticity as experiencing some kind of ancient or untouched culture. Just by being there and taking photos I, along with every other traveller, have touched the untouched and thus a fallacy is acknowledged.

0.0

INTRODUCTION

0.7

Home Stay Travel Type 2

The fact is, we do live in a world that is globalized, where travellers have pollinated world cultures with new ideas just by visiting and exposing themselves and the different places they come from. As is embodied by this photo, the local Peruvian native, perhaps never being able to travel outside his country, still knows about the world or the baseball team called the Los Angeles Angels. Regardless of his conscious or unconscious decision to wear his hat, that fact is that he chose it speaks volumes about

3 | Less-Scripted Experience

The question then is, where can a traveller find this, where can they have a more personal/reciprocal exchange? The answer leads us to the other side of the travel spectrum which is the Home Stay, which is for people who desire a less scripted experience of a country.3 This type of travel is great because you are culturally immersed as you’re involved with all experiences of your hosting family what they eat, they’re daily routines. It’s also a great way to experience intimacy because of the

globalization and the growing intimacy that’s happening everywhere today. Where some would think this is problematic, I believe this growing globalism is something we should embrace. And I believe that what the adventuresome traveller is looking for is actually reciprocity. They want to 0.0 knowledge, INTRODUCTION Theknow, question then is,things, where can a traveller find this, where can they have a challenge their challenge what they learn new more personal/reciprocal exchange? The answer leads us to the other side and to teach new things in return. 0.7 Home Stay of the travel spectrum which is the Home Stay, which is for people who desire a less scripted experience of a country.3

Travel Type 2

3 | Globalization

This type of travel is great because you are culturally immersed as you’re involved with all experiences of your hosting family what they eat, they’re daily routines. It’s also a great way to experience intimacy because of the

4 | Home Stay

consistent contact with your host, and its relatively cheap way to trave However, as great as this immersed experience can be, it does come wit its difficulties. Because you are directly living under another family’s ro you could experience a lack of privacy unlike with a hotel, or let’s not forge that most homes have rules such as curfews and often forbid bringing hom new friends, restricting your freedom. In fact, the traveller conforms to th family’s lifestyle. And finally to access this type of travel is cumbersom due to applications and references checks

0.0

INTRODUCTION

0.13

Sites for Prototypes

To try out this concept, Peru was used an are chosen, each pertaining to distinct geograph district. 1. City of Cusco (city) 2. Inka trail (andes) 3. Lake Titicaca (water) HOMESTAY

13

12

0.0

INTRODUCTION

0.11

Reciprocal Exchange Web

In the current time that we’re in, social networks allows us to connect anywhere in the globe, as such a platform can be used like Airbnb, to allow tourist and local to connect.5 This would permit travellers reliability to book trips for comfort, new sites, and sustenance where reciprocal exchange

of culture, knowledge and social experience can occur for both parties, 0.0 and in turn the local also gets a benefits of economic growth leading to community development and personal fulfillment because of his new role 0.12 of global travel.

INTRODUCTION Distribution of Economics + Roles

$

In terms of distribution of economics and roles, the haven is a nucleus where multiple locals can participate. For instance, inside the haven one local can house keep while another can takes care of cooking, and another can later teach about cultural craft or endow knowledge to the visitor.

Social Experience

$

$ $ 13

$

14

$

$

$

$ LOCAL FESTIVALS+ EVENTS

LOCALS

Micro-Havens

$

$

$

$ 15

LOCAL HOUSEKEEPING

$$

LOCAL KNOWLEDGE

$

$

Micro-Havens

LOCAL FOOD

$

LOCAL ADVENTURE

$

SITE 1: C

SITE 2: I

LOCAL TRADITIONS

Comfort

$ $

Sites Food

6 | Micro Havens : Reciprocal Exchange Web

SITE 3: L

Personal Fulfillment

Community Development

$

LOCAL INTERACTIONS

$

Economic Growth

$ 24

$

$ LOCAL SITES

16

$

TOURIST

$

13

Outside the haven another local can take out the traveller to festivals and events, new sites, adventure, and new cultural interactions.

$

$

Knowledge Culture Experience

16

13

26

25

7 | Micro Havens : Distribution of Economics + Roles

28

9

8 | Sites

27


1.0

DESIGN

1.11

Site 1: Cusco

Looking at the site’s surroundings a current construction methods, and p this investigation, Peruvian textiles to its material abundance and cultur

Local Materials + Construction

$

$

N

EMBED 2.0

DESIGN

2.2

Site 2: Inca Trail

$

Located on a hillside, the site is adjacent to local community and a historic Inca site known as Llactapata.

Exterior Perspective

$

Balcony View

Analysis

+

$

$

$

$

scripted experiences hotels city centre

H H

$

H

H

$

$

H

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

DDESIGN R I FTheTsite chosen is beside one of floating Urus community islands.

3.0

1

3.3

SITE 1

Site 3: Lake Titicaca

$

$

$

$

Exterior Perspective

Prototype 1 | Frame

Context Plan 1:20,000

+

$

Analysis

$

brick wood

clay block | US

clay block

$ $

$Interior Perspective

N

$

$

N

concrete

$ Site Plan 1:1000

$

$

3.0

DESIGN

3.4

Site 3: Lake Titicaca

$

$

SITE

2

$

SITE clay block | US$20/m2

concrete | US$180/m2

adobe block | US$180/m2

1.2 | Cusc

$

brick

wood

N

The Urus community i travertine | US of one material: Totora building material for a structure, and boats.

Urus Community

+

tin roof

$

adobe block

$

$

$

1.1 | Site 1: Cusco $

Site Location 1: 10,000

$

tin roof

$

SITE

$

$

N

$

$

$$

SITE 1 $

$

$

$

Si

$

$

$

$

$

2.5

$

$

local experiences

$

2.0

SITE

spanish roof tile | US$20/m2

SITE

clay block N

$

$

N

adobe block

Site Location 1:10,000

Exterior Perspective Context Plan 1: 10,000

Prototype 2 | Embed

Interior Perspective

2.1 | Site 2: Inka Trail

Site Location regular plate glass1: 5000 | US$90/m2

travertine | US$175/m2

Street + Study: Layering of Building Materials

tin sheet | US$15/m2

2.2 | Inka

Site Plan 1: 1,000 peruvian handmade textiles | US$2/m2

peruvian hand-made ceramics | US$1/piece

Catalogue of current Building Materials + Potential Building Materials

+

SITE

3

SITE

concrete

52 piled-up

wedged

denticulated

flat-fitted

rough

smooth

SITE

natural

Spanish Roof Tile Illactapata Ruin (Inka Construction)

Local Community Construction N

38

Prototype 3 | Drift

SITE

N

encased

braced

dowelled

flat-fitted

cushioned

convex

bevelled edges

3.1 | Site 3: Lake Titicaca

Context Plan 1: 20,000

Site Location 1: 10,000

Illactapata Ruin

3.2 | Lake

Site Plan 1: 750

Inka Building Methods: Wall Construction

+

N flat

Current Community Construction: Adobe Block Buildings

Site Location 1: 5,000 N

Context References

Tile sub-structure

SITE 2

1:200

96

Th

Landscape/Contour Influence 1.Bed + Push-Down dinner table 2. Kitchen 3. Lavatory 4. Balcony

Uros Community (Floating Islands)

Wood Frame

Totora Reed Construction

Totora Reed Structure & Weave Details

House + Boat Construction

N

3

A

66

2 1

10 4

72

Ceiling Textile Frame Finish


catalogue was made of local materials, potential materials for construction. In s took lead into the first prototype due ral method of production (handmade).

1.0

DESIGN

1.7

Site 1: Cusco

To begin the design of the first prototype, parameters where placed such as referencing adjacent building for site line production.

Following this method, a small dwelling program was created through the main design intent of framing the city.

Site Parameters+Program

1.0

DESIGN

ite 2: Inca Trail

DESIGN

1.10

Beside the community, the Llactapata ruin embraces the elements of landscape and architecture. In this investigation of materials and construction, Incan architecture explores the wall as a core element to build within the landscape: embed.

Site 1: Cusco

Prior to investigating construction and materiality, nonetheless containing program, the building becomes a scaffold for reciprocal exchange, waiting to inherit its surroundings: cultural materials and construction methods.

Building Scaffold

Analysis

S$20/m2

concrete | US$180/m2

adobe block | US$180/m2

spanish roof tile | US$20/m2

2.0

is a unique where locals live on floating islands made regular glass is the | main US$90/m2 aS$175/m2 reed plant. In this setting the plate plant alone

almost everything in the community including houses, co: Local Amenities

2.0

DESIGN

N2.6

Site 2: Inca Trail

tin sheet | US$15/m2

hand-made ceramics | US$1/p

3.0

DESIGN

3.9

Site 3: Lake Titicaca

peruvian handmade textiles | US$2/m2

2.6 2.6

44

Influenced by the nature of this investigation, a parti was developed where a (1) space is (2) formed by the sites terrain, (3) divided by its scenic views of mountains, rivers, community, and historical ruin, (4) and finally embedding into the landscape through walls in which a flexible dwelling

DESIGN

2.8

Site 2: Inca Trail

N Building Scaffold

program canby be the created. 2.0 the DESIGN DESIGN Influenced Influenced by nature nature of this of this investigation, investigation, DESIGN aInfluenced parti a parti waswas bydeveloped the developed nature of this investigation, a parti was developed Parti where where a (1)aspace (1) space is (2)is formed (2) formed by the by the sitessites terrain, where (3) divided (3) a1:200 divided (1) space by its byscenic is its(2) scenic formed by the sites terrain, (3) divided by its scenic Siteterrain, References SiteSite 2: Inca 2: Inca TrailTrailviews 2.6 rivers, Site 2: Inca views of mountains, of mountains, rivers, community, community, andTrail and historical historical viewsruin, ofruin, mountains, (4) and (4) and finally rivers, finally community, and historical ruin, (4) and finally embedding embedding intointo the the landscape landscape through through walls walls in which in embedding which a flexible a flexible intodwelling the dwelling landscape through walls in which a flexible dwelling program program cancan be created. be created. program can be created. PartiParti Parti

2.0 2.0

Once again, the build is a scaffold for reciprocal exchange to occur with its surrounding context of materials, construction methods, and culture. Thus as investigated previously, the building can take on new characteristics from its context of Inca wall construction and local adobe block construction methods.

Program 1:200 45

1.4 | Parti

1.5 | Scaffold

As mentioned the Totora Plan is utilized heavily in the site’s context. Through bundling and weaving the material can take on multiple uses such as boats, roofs, walls, floors, structure, and more.

50

Materiality: Totora Reed Plant

3.0

DESIGN

3.5

Site 3: Lake Titicaca

Through this investigation of site, community, and culture a parti was created. In a place where (1) space floats on water the building takes on (2) forces that can pull in multiple directions, where (3) rotation of these forces can occur in all directions, finally (4) opening the space on all sides.

Parti

1_space

2_form

1_space 1_space

3.0

DESIGN

3.8

Site 3: Lake Titicaca Building Scaffold

3_divide

2_form 2_form 1_space

4_embed

2_form 3_divide 3_divide

3_divide 4_embed 4_embed

2.4 | Parti

Trail: Past & Present

As a scaffold, the building can take on new characteristics from its context in the Urus Community, their building materials and methods.

4_embed

2.5 | Scaffold

74

75 74 74

74

75 75

78

75

53

natural

carved

rustic

refined

coarse

rough

smooth

1_space

cushioned

2_forces

convex

3_rotate

flat

4_open

3.4 | Parti

Titicaca: Floating Islands

bevelled edges

3.5 | Scaffold

98

99

104

97

73 106

107

11


1.0

DESIGN

1.14

Site 1: Cusco Exterior Rendering

Prototype 1: Frame | Exterior Perspective

58

59

12


1.0

DESIGN

1.15

Site 1: Cusco Interior Rendering

Prototype 1: Frame | Interior Perspective

60

61

13


N

Context References

1:200

1.Bed + Push-Down dinner table 2. Kitchen 3. Lavatory 4. Balcony

3

A

2 1

4

N

A Building Plan

1:75

Flexible Bed/Dinning Space Spanish Roof Tile Framed Textile Exterior Finish + Interior Framed Textile Balustrade

14


lication of its material catalogue, the scaffold takes on a f reciprocol exchange, where it inherits cultural building aterials, and new methods. In this first prototype the ded with cultural textiles made by locals. Spanish Roof Tile

building is not only a place for reciprocity for local and so a site for reciprocity to in culture and architecture.

Tile sub-structure

Wood Frame

Ceiling Textile Frame Finish

Exterior Textile Frame Finish Concrete Block Wall Glass

Textile Frame Balustrade

Concrete Floor/Slab

15

Exploded Perspective: Material Breakdown Prototype 1: Frame | Exploded Axonometric 55


2.0 2.10

DESIGN Site 2: Inca Trail Exterior Rendering

Prototype 2: Embed | Exterior Perspective

84

85

16


2.0

DESIGN

2.11

Site 2: Inca Trail Interior Rendering

Prototype 2: Embed | Interior Perspective

86

87

17


1_building block

2_form

3_divide

4_embed

Building Parti

1.Bed + Push-Down dinner table 2. Kitchen 3. Lavatory 4. Multi-Purpose Spaces

4 4

3

4

2

4

1

A

A

4

N

Building Plan 1:75

Thatch Roof Structural Wood Beams + Girders Adobe Block Wall Glass

18


prototype the building takes on rural methods of building uch as adobe block construction, thatch roofing, and stone Thatch Roof

Wood Frame Structure

Adobe Block Wall

Glass

Natural Sand Floor

Natural Stone Floor

19

Exploded Axonometric: MaterialAxonometric Breakdown Prototype 2: Embed | Exploded 81


3.0

DESIGN

3.11

Site 3: Lake Titicaca Exterior Rendering

Prototype 3: Drift | Exterior Perspective

110

111

20


3.0

DESIGN

3.12

Site 3: Lake Titicaca Interior Rendering

Prototype 3: Drift | Interior Perspective

112

11

21


1_building block

2_forces

3_rotate

4_ open

Building Parti

1. Fold-Out Bed 2. Fold Down Island 3. Kitchen 4. Lavatory 5. Walking Deck

3 2

A

5

A

4 1

Building Plan 1:75

Reservoir Tank Gas Light Double Wall Outboard Motor + Generator


prototype the building takes on methods of building from the Urus Community and the Totora Plant where roofs, are assembled., along with modern elements altogether ique architecture through reciprocity.

Totora Reed Roof

Wood Frame Structure

Corrugated Sliding Doors Totora Reed Roof

Wood Post Rope Balustrade Reservoir Tank Totora Floor Outboard Motor

Totora Beams (Buoyancy Support)

Fuel Tank Septic Tank

23

109 Prototype 3: Drift | Exploded Axonometric



HENRY MOORE WATERFRONT SCULPTURAL CENTRE Course: Studio III ARC21A/B (Fall/Winter Semester 2008/2009) Professor: John Ingrao Bachelor of Architectural Science Ryerson University

This studio project held complexity in both design and technical design. With the premise for creating a sculpture centre, located within Toronto’s East Bayfront, for housing and displaying significant Henry Moore sculptures, this year long project involved many phases of design (i.e. preliminary, schematic, and design development). Site analysis, Ontario Building Code study were also considered within building design. The final design of my sculptural centre considered transparencies and visual voids.


Site Analysis

Site: Toronto Waterfront

26


S

10min MG

S P

Galleries Schools Parking Distances

MG

P

MG

Circulation Routes

Building Heights

Open Space

27

5 min


1 : 100

A203-THIRD FLOOR

Third Floor Plan

1 www.autodesk.com/revit

28 Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Design Concept

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

5. visual activity

GALLERY SPACE 15

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

DISPLAY OTB

UP

9

LIBRARY/ RESOURCE CENTRE

GALLERY SPACE

STUDENT WORKSHOP

8

DN

No.

Description

Date

UP

10

DN

STUDENT WORKSHOP

UP

4. sculptural Void

STORAGE 14

1 1 : 100

A202-SECOND FLOOR

13

12

6

5

4

2

1

11

3

Owner

Second Floor Plan

Project Name www.autodesk.com/revit

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Unnamed

15

GALLERY SPACE

Project Number

Project number Consultant Address Date Address Phone Fax Drawn bye-mail Consultant Checked Address by Address Phone Fax e-mail

GALLERY SPACE

DISPLAY

UP

9

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Issue Date Author Checker

A103 1 : 100

12/01/2012 4:06:56 AM

CURATOR’S OFFICE

Scale

3. void

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

ARCHIVES

OTB

OTB

8

DN

UP

10

DN DN

STORAGE

COAT STORAGE

SERVICE

14

Description

No.

Date

2. visual Inactivity

www.autodesk.com/revit

1

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

1 : 100

A201-FIRST FLOOR

13

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

DN

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

DN DN

DN

Owner

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

15

Project Name

DN

DN

6000

Unnamed

UP

9

UP

Project number

Project Number

Date

6000

Issue Date

Drawn by

OUTDOOR SEATING

CAFE SEATING

Author

Checked by

Checker

8

OUTDOOR GARDEN

DN

6000

A102

No.

Description

12/01/2012 4:05:55 AM

12

6

5

4

3

2

1

11

Ground Floor Plan

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

1. plates

ATRIUM

Date

Scale

1 : 100

UP

10

UP

6000

STORAGE

RECEPTION

LOADING

CAFE/KITCHEN

14

8000

8000

8000

8000

8000

8000

8000

8000


roof parapet

glazing top overhang

restaurant parapet

suspended ceiling tile

spandrel panel steel beam

full height vision wall glazing wood louvres concrete column

glazing base overhang

Section Cut: Grand Atrium

Wall Section Detail

29


30


31

Henry Moore Waterfront Sculpture Centre



BAQA’A COMMUNITY CENTRE Course: Thesis ARC41A (Fall/Winter Semester 2009-2010) Thesis Instructor: Jamie Lee (WZMH Architects) Thesis Mentor: Mark Baechler (Teeple Architects) Bachelor of Architectural Science Ryerson University

Since the advent of Israel’s establishment as a state, the immigration flux of 500,000 West Bank Palestinians moving into Jordan holds historic significance of human progress and growth for new urban fabrics. With the assimilation of the Palestinian population, as well as economic development, 78% of the country’s population live within urban environments today. However, the past priority of the dwelling unit has currently raised negligence of community amenities and open space within certain cities, such as Baqa’a. Thus, the creation of a community centre, amalgamating landscape and building, progressing human hierarchy of needs is the focus of this thesis.


LOCATION

World Atlas

Middle East

Jordan t

s fa s

existing

s m sc c

gr

s h

m

m

g s Russia

c

s Canada UK

c

Germany Serbia

France

Syria

Italy United States Canada

Algeria

w

4 5

23

Pakistan

China

s

require

Russia

Nepal

Palestine

UK

Mexico

1

Germany

Bangladesh

Lebanon

Thailand France Chad

Costa Rica Panama United States

Venezuela

Serbia Syria JORDAN

Mexico

Panama

Sierra Leone Liberia

Bangladesh

Namibia Ivory Coast Egypt Sudan

Papua

Thailand

Tanzania India

JORDAN

Chad Venezuela

China Malaysia Nepal

Kenya Lebanon

DRC Ecuador Costa Rica

India Pakistan

Yemen Ethiopia

Italy Sierra Leone Ivory Coast Egypt Sudan Liberia Cameroon Palestine Algeria Congo

Yemen Mozambique Ethiopia

Malaysia

Australia

Cameroon

Kenya

South Africa

Congo DRC

Papua

Tanzania

1,500,000 + Ecuador 1,250,000 1,000,000 750,000 500,000 250,000 100,000 30,000 5000 1,500,000 + 1,250,000

Stage 1: Location/Site/Conflict 1,000,000 750,000 500,000

Mozambique Population: Namibia Jordan Refugee

1,835,704

Australia

Refugee Population: South Africa

Jordan Refugee Population: 1,835,704

Stage 2: Site framework vs. local urban framework

Refugee Population:

250,000 100,000 30,000 5000

34


Site

Grid

Fracture1 over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over

Fracture2

under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under_under

Fracture3 Fracture4

Stage 3: Fractures

Stage 4: Site/concept

Stage 5: Edge/Cross connections

over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over_over

35


Stage 7: Surface manipulation (cut, weaved, pulled, bent, striated, collapsed, rippled, perforated)

1: Site

2: Adjacent Schools

3: Primary/Secondary Roads

4: External nodes

5: Internal nodes

6: Site connection lines

36


Stage 6: Overlap

program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program pro-

7: Ground>Under>Ground

8: Ground>Over>Ground

9: Program

10: Edge connections1(line)

11: Edge connections2(curve)

12: Edge connection2(curve)+extend

37


admin offices change room washroom library faith room theatre room music room dance studio weight and condition arts and crafts room language room culinary arts photography cafe atrium outdoor garden outdoor sport field

Stage 8: Program matrix

WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA

COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE

MUSIC ROOM

LANGUAGE ROOM

RECEPTION

CAFETERIA

DANCE STUDIO

STORAGE

ATRIUM

SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO

CULINARY ARTS STUDIO

THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM

LIBRARY

GAR. RM

FAITH ROOM

SHIPPING/ RECEIVING

LOADING AREA

Stage 9: Program infusion

Stage 10: Site Plan 38


Program1(Passive)

Atrium

Program2(Active)

Valley Entrances

Program3(Subtle)

Theatre

Service & Parking

Sports Arena

Interior Building Breakdown 39


WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA

COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE

MUSIC ROOM

LANGUAGE ROOM

RECEPTION

CAFETERIA

DANCE STUDIO

STORAGE

ATRIUM

SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO

CULINARY ARTS STUDIO

THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM

LIBRARY

GAR. RM

FAITH ROOM

SHIPPING/ RECEIVING

LOADING AREA

Section A

WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA

COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE

MUSIC ROOM

LANGUAGE ROOM

RECEPTION

CAFETERIA

DANCE STUDIO

WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA

STORAGE

COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE

ATRIUM

SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO

MUSIC ROOM

CULINARY ARTS STUDIO

THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM

LANGUAGE ROOM

RECEPTION

CAFETERIA

DANCE STUDIO

LIBRARY

GAR. RM

FAITH ROOM

STORAGE

SHIPPING/ RECEIVING

ATRIUM

SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO

LOADING AREA

CULINARY ARTS STUDIO

THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM

LIBRARY

GAR. RM

FAITH ROOM

SHIPPING/ RECEIVING

LOADING AREA

WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA

COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE

MUSIC ROOM

LANGUAGE ROOM

RECEPTION

CAFETERIA

DANCE STUDIO

STORAGE

ATRIUM

SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO

CULINARY ARTS STUDIO

THEATRE ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM

LIBRARY

GAR. RM

FAITH ROOM

SHIPPING/ RECEIVING

LOADING AREA

Section B 40


B: Spatial Panorama cutting through atrium, entrance, and library

WEIGHT/CONDITION AREA

COMMUNITY GALLERY/LOUNGE

MUSIC ROOM

LANGUAGE ROOM

RECEPTION

CAFETERIA

DANCE STUDIO

STORAGE

ATRIUM

SCULPTURE & CERAMIC STUDIO

CULINARY ARTS STUDIO

ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM

A

B

THEATRE

LIBRARY

GAR. RM

FAITH ROOM

SHIPPING/ RECEIVING

LOADING AREA

41


North Elevation

South Elevation

West Elevation

East Elevation

42


Building Entrance

43


44


Baqa’a Community Centre 45



DUFFERIN GROVE COMMUNITY COMMON Course: Comprehensive Building Project ARC 2014YS (Winter Semester 2013) Professor: Maria Denegri (Denegri Bessai Studio) Master of Architecture (Year II - Advanced Placement) University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape & Design Project role: Project Architect

The interpretation of ‘community’ carries a significant amount of meaning within literature and architecture. As a word, it’s defined as “a social group of any size whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common culture.” With this consideration of common entities sharing spaces or ideologies, our design thesis was formed: A division of major programmatic building units closely attached or adjacent to one another altogether achieving unity in the context of a large public park space. By carrying forth the literal significance of community, where common entities share spaces and be unified, our design thesis was established. With the strategy to build three major cohesive building entities on site, creating unique interior spaces, and shaping new outdoor program spaces for all public users to utilize to the fullest, the new Dufferin Grove Community Centre not only carries a considerable amount of literal expression, but an architectural one as well.


Site Location

R

BLOO E YONG

GE

DUFFE

COLLE

RIN

City of Toronto

Site Plan

Dufferin Street & College Street West

1:2000

48

Dufferin Mall + Dufferin Grove Park


Parti

LOUNGE

LOUNGE

LOUNGE

LOUNGE

GYM

GYM

GYM

GYM

HALL

HALL

HALL

HALL

Common entities sharing space/ Common Grounds

Context Plan

Major Program Entities

Major Program Geometry Spread/ New Exterior Programs

1:1000

49

Program entities & Connectivity


4

2

7 8

3

1

5

6

9

12 11 13

10

14

1 LOUNGE 2 MAIN LOBBY 3 CAFE 4 SKATE CHANGE PARK 5 MALE CHANGEROOM 6 FEMALE CHANGEROOM 7 ZAMBONI 8 EAST LOBBY 9 SKATE PARK 10 MARKET PLACE 11 OUTDOOR PROJECTION SCREEN 12 MULTI PURPOSE GYM 13 OFFICE 14 EQUIPMENT ROOM 15 OUTDOOR THEATRE 16 MULTI PURPOSE HALL 17 STORAGE 18 MALE/FEMALE WASHROOM 19 RECEPTION 20 SOUTH LOBBY 21 LOADING DOCK 22 ATRIUM 23 PUBLIC MALE/FEMALE WASHROOM

17

22

19

15

23

21

18

20

16

N

Ground Floor Plan

1:1000

North Building Section

1:1000

Multi-Purpose Gym Section

1:1000 50


2

6 5 7

1 3

4

8

1 UPPER CAFE/LOUNGE 2 COMMON SPACE 3 STAFF OFFICES 4 STORAGE/OFFICE SPACE 5 MALE WASHROOM 6 FEMALE WASHROOM 7 MEETING SPACE 8 MEETING ROOM 9 MALE/FEMALE WASHROOM 10 MEETING ROOMS 11 PUBLIC GREENROOF

9

11 10

N

Second Floor Plan

1:1000

South Building Section

1:1000

Cross Section

1:1000

51


Exterior Perspective: South Building Threshold

Exterior Perspective: Entrance + Multi-purpose Gym + Multi-purpose Hall

52


Interior Perspective: Multi-purpose Gym

Interior Perspective: Entrance + Lounge + Cafe

53


BRUSH SEALS ALUMINIUM FLASHING

MECHANICAL PUMP FOR VENTILATION CONTROL

WEATHER MEMBRANE w/ PLYWOOD

STEEL BAR ANCHORED

ROOFING MESH GRAVEL

1 RIGID INSULATION AIR VAPOUR BARRIER

1

CAFE

POST + RAIL FRAMING OUTER GLAZING

RECEPTION

2 3

LOUNGE

DOUBLE GLAZING MULLION SUPPORT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

Exterior Feature Wall: Half Pipe Wall HARDWOOD LOUVRES

4

OPERABLE WINDOW

FLASHING

MULTIPURPOSE GYM

STEEL STUD

GRILLS TO INTAKE AIR

2

STONE TILE

STEEL SUPPORT

5

SPANDREL PANEL EXTERIOR METAL CLADDING

SKATE PARK

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

6

CONCRETE PAVERS AGGREGATE IN OPENINGS BEDDING COURSE STEEL COLUMN

STONE OPEN GRADE

7

EARTH

STONE CLADDING

FARMERS MARKET

8

EFeature Wall: Gym Wall/Half Pipe Wall

PAR TI AL PLAN

1 Parapet w/ Ventilation 2 Double Skin Facade 3 Dropped Ceiling Exposed Structure 4 Steel Plates & Mullions Hold Glazing 5 Interior Louvres Controlled Mechanically 6 Interlocking Pavement

1 PARAPET w/ VENTILATION 2 DOUBLE SKIN FACADE | SC ALE 1:50 3 DROP CEILING EXPOSED STRUCTURE 4 STEEL PLATES AND MULLIONS HOLD GLAZING 5 INTERIOR LOUVRES CONTROLLED MECHANICALLY 6 INTERLOCKING PAVEMENT 7 LOUNGE AREA 8 FOUNDATION

FLOOR TILES

7 Lounge Area 8 Foundation

1

Double Skin: Complete Assembly & Materials

by: alvaro quispe | instructor: maria denegri | arc_2014YS: architectural design studio IV | comprehensive building project 03.18.2013

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

MECHANICS TO LOUVRES AND OPERABLE WINDOW

ARC 2014YS - CC 3: Conceptual Detail

M A R I A

D E N E G R I

F A R A H K A B I R UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

DETAIL WALL SECTION SCALE 1: 20 54

PLYWOOD SHEATHING w/ WEATHER BARRIER

RIGID INSULATION FOOTING

REINFORCED CONCR STEEL REBAR

DRAINAGE PIPE

ARC 2014YS - CC 3: Conceptual Detail

M A R I A

D E N E G R I

F A R A H K A B I R UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

PARAPET - DOUBLE SKIN - FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE 1: 10


W/ DRIP EDGE ON 2 - 13 EXTERIOR PLYWOOD ROOF MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION

1

2

3

6

3

PARAPET DETAIL

2

WALL DETAIL

lateral structural steel supports & connections welded onto hss

4

5

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

6

7

10

window top: rigid insulation completed with z-bars, clips, metal cap, and mullion roof: membrane + rigid insulation + plywood sheathing + asphalt 8 mechanical + electrical + plumbing

by: Alvaro Quispe | instructor: Ivan Saleff | arc_2045H: building science-materials & construction II | major project | 04.01.2013

1 Parapet 2 Timber Glulam Structure Exposed 3 Vision + Spandrel Panels 4 Metal Cladding 5 Concrete Wall 6 Concrete Quarter Pipe 7 Multipurpose Gym 8 Wood Flooring

2

Gym Wall Section: Complete Assembly & Materials

55



URBAN PILLOW: DORMITORY Course: Architectural Design Studio IV - Sleep Professor: Natalie Fizer Master of Architecture (Year II - Advanced Placement) University of Toronto, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape & Design

Over the course of a semester, students were to develop, research, and frame a final dormatory building project all influenced by the studio’s core subject: sleep. Through case studies of buildings associated with sleep, as well as research dedicated to sleep as a component of program and significance in time cycles, the final project in this studio was realized.


program

core

skin: air light shade enclosure structure

program

1_single

program

core1

program

program

core2

program

2_split

module program

core1

program

program

core2

program

core: physically non-active program + physically active program

3_stack

program program

c o r e (1+2)

program

program

4_merge

conceptual module combinations

model perspective 58


air natural light artificial light enclosure air private natural light public artificial light enclosure private public

air artificial light natural light no light air enclosure artificial light napping natural light public no light enclosure napping public

air natural light flora/nature no enclosure air public natural light

air natural light artificial light enclosure air public natural light

flora/nature no enclosure public

artificial light enclosure public

7.5m

9.6m

16m

dorm units

nap unit

outdoor/open space

air natural light artificial light enclosure air public natural light physical activities artificial light

air natural artificia enclosu air public natural

artificia enclosu public

enclosure public physical activities

12m

21.5m

classroom

swimming pool/gym

Program Sections operable window bed private study sliding door operable window hallway seating bed view to study outside private sliding door hallway seating view to outside

dorm units

hallway seating open napping enclosed napping view to outside hallway seating

seating/napping pathway landscape open to outside seating/napping

open napping enclosed napping view to outside

pathway landscape open to outside

nap unit

outdoor/open space

operable windows hallway 20 seat classroom

cardio area weight area lane pool

half wa view to 200 pu

operable windows hallway 20 seat classroom

cardio area weight area lane pool

half wa view to 200 pu

classroom

Program Plans 59

swimming pool/gym


PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

Site Plan

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

Site: College Street and Spadina Avenue (Toronto)

60

Ground Floor


8

2 5 3 7

4 3 1

6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1

atrium auditorium swimming pool napping study classroom washroom outdoor space

6

7

3

4

4 5

2 7

1st Floor Plan

2nd Floor Plan

61

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

change rm outdoor gym classroom public study event space cafe


a

a

Section a-a

62


b

63

b

Section b-b


West Elevation

64


South-West Perspective

65



WZMH ARCHITECTS ST. THOMAS CONSOLIDATED COURTHOUSE WZMH Principal: Nicola Casciato & Hatice Yazar WZMH Associate: Jee-Young Kang Date: Jun 2010 - Jan 2011

Q-SHIP TOWER WZMH Principal: Medhat Abdou WZMH Associate: Stephen Hancock Date: Sept 2011 - Oct 2011

NORTH YORK CITY CENTRE - FOOD COURT RENOVATION WZMH Principal: Medhat Abdou WZMH Associate: Stephen Hancock Date: May 2012 - Aug 2012


68


ST. THOMAS CONSOLIDATED COURTHOUSE Constructed within a residential neighborhood in St. Thomas Ontario, 1853, the St. Thomas (Elgin County) Courthouse is a provincially designated heritage building. With respect to project’s premise of being a preservation and expansion project, the design proposal was focused on three tasks: preserving and restoring the Elgin County Courthouse and the former Land Registry Office, as well as providing a significant but subtle architectural addition. Having an established arrangement of a tripartite portico entry, the new addition anchors the existing building’s backdrop with its symmetrical extension to the east and west. Within the design of the building, a three storey atrium space was created to act as a spatial separation between the existing building and new addition. During this portion of the project I was given the opportunity to work on the interior design of the atrium space and public corridors, specifically materials arrangement, application, scale, order, and colour renderings for final presentation.

69


Central Atrium (Courtesy of Norm Li)

Autrium

Public Corridors (Courtesy of Norm Li)

70


Interior Atrium Space (South Face) 16

17

19

27

GL 1 Sandblasted Glass·6mm, Tempered, Sandblasted·Sidelights · 16 GL 2 Safety Glass · 12mm Laminated and Guard rails · 17 MET 1 Metal Trims · Interior Metal Accents and Transitional Strips · 19 WD1 Wood Veneer Panels · Rift Cut Red Oak · 27 GBP Gypsum Board Painted · Paint · Interior Walls · 28

28

Public Corridors 16

17

20

25

GL 1 Sandblasted Glass·6mm, Tempered, Sandblasted · Sidelights · 16 GL 2 Safety Glass · 12mm Laminated and Guard rails · 17 STN 1 Limestone 300x600, White Sands, Honed · Public Circulation Wall and Column Finish · 20 TEX 1 Acoustical Wall Covering · Courtrooms and Public Waiting Areas · 25 MET-2 · Stainless Steel - XL Blend ‘S’ Finish · Elevator Doors · 29

29

71


72


Q-SHIP TOWER The Q-Ship Tower was a unique proposal in that it had to be completed and submitted within 7 days. With the premise that the tower would be made for Qatar Navigation Company, opportunity had risen to create a distinguished landmark that would utilize its immediate surroundings. Fluid forms were the inspiration for the design of the building, including, billowing sails, water motion, and sand dunes. In addition, the outer skin design obtains a cultural appearance of a cloak wrapping around the building. Within this short scheduled proposal, I was given opportunity to work directly with Associate Principal, Stephen Hancock, who led the design and team of the Q-Ship Tower. I was given the responsibility for all model tasks including, massing, concept iterations, detailed facade designs, and final elevation renderings for presentation.

Site: Qatar, Doha

73


day 1

day 2

day 3

day 4

day 5

day 6

day 7

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

1.1

2.1

3.1

4.1

5.1

6.1

7.1

3D Model iterations by Alvaro Quispe | Plan Sketches by Stephen Hancock above

74


day 8

Rendering Courtesy of Q-Studio

75


3.0 residential facade system

2.0 facade pattern

Exploded Axonometric View by Alvaro Quispe

1.0 podium facade system

76

Sketches by Steve Hancock


Elevation renderings by Alvaro Quispe N

W

E

77

S


78


NORTH YORK CITY CENTRE - FOOD COURT RENOVATION A small project, nonetheless very experiential. This project involved many tasks from beginning to end including: Photography & documentation of existing site, measured drawings, technical drawings, coordination with all consultants, issue for permit, tender, addendum, and construction.

79


New Central Food Court

80


5150 YONGE STREET TORONTO, ONTARIO

Drawing set sample: Proposed Floor Plan

81


New Floor Paving

82


5150 YONGE STREET TORONTO, ONTARIO

Drawing set sample: Floor Paving Plan

83


Half wall detail

84


85

Trellis detail


86


BBB ARCHITECTS MONCTON CENTRAL SPORTS + ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE BBB Principal: Greg Alexander Senior Designer: Justin Perdue Date: May 2014 - August 2014

Q-SHIP TOWER BBB Principal: Greg Alexander Senior Designer: Ryan Tait Date: May 2014 - August 2014

87


88


MONCTON CENTRAL SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE

At BBB Architects the main project I was involved in was the

Moncton Central Sports & Entertainment Centre, a stadium competition and master plan project. Using Revit Architecture our team focused on preliminary design and schematic design where I was responsible for designing and producing architectural illustration, diagrams, and final renderings for client presentations.

89


Master Plan

90


Aerial View - Plaza

91


14 DUNCAN STREET TORONTO, ON M5H 3G8

Y 1

TEL (416) 591 8999

1

2

6763

3

9000

6

33400

R5

R4

R3

A-401

26800

R6

1200

7

6764

R7

FAX (416) 591 9087

8

7300

R8 7071 BAYERS ROAD, SUITE 5007 HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, B3L 2C2

A1

TEL (902) 422 4587

CCC +/- 0

11500

RETAIL 3750 SF

VESTIBULE 1070 SF

RETAIL 3760 SF

BRICK

BB

150 TRUMBUL STREET, 3RD FLOOR HARTFORD, CT 06103 USA TEL

SS FAM. WR 90 SF

STAIR A

FAM. WR 100 SF

P.C.

AA

R9

STAIR B

WOMENS WR 510 SF

MENS WR 480 SF

CONCESSION 600 SF

SUITE ENTRY 390 SF

CONCESSION 600 SF

UP

SUITE/VIP ENTRANCE

FAMILY WR 110 SF

STOR

WOMENS WASHROOM 650 SF

MENS WR 610 SF 4793

BRICK

R10

7402 CONCOURSE

R1 C

FFF

GRASS

CONCRETE PAVERS

ELEC

ELEC

21168

R2

P.C.

CONCRETE PAVERS

LOBBY 860 SF

Maricor 77 Vaughan Harvey Blvd, Suite 200 Moncton, NB E1C 0K2 Bus: (506) 857-8880 Fax: (506) 859-8393 www.mcw.com

POTENTIAL LOCATION OF TEMPORARY GRANDSTAND

B

TT 200 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 7th FLOOR TORONTO, ON M5H 3C6 TEL (416) 477 5832

UU

VV

2 BLOOR STREET EAST, SUITE 2100 TORONTO, ON M4W 1A8 TEL (416) 920-5100

FAX (416) 922-8768

11288

P.C.

4420

TICKETING 550 SF

4420

WW

77 ROONEY CRESCENT MONCTON, NB E1E 4M4 TEL (506) 858 7180

OFFICE

FAX (506) 858 0742

D WOMENS WR 690 SF

XX

10300

MENS WR 510 SF

P.C.

CONCOURSE 43040 SF

YY

POTENTIAL LOCATION OF TEMPORARY EXTERIOR NHL-SIZE ICE SURFACE

10300

EQ

E CONCESSION 720 SF

2

1

CONCESSION 710 SF

A-402

A-402

1

A-301

ZZ

EQ

X

P.C.

F

PRE-FUNCTION SPACE 6050 SF

10300

P.C.

MENS WR 510 SF

AAA

CONCOURSE

-500

BBB

WOMEN WR 700 SF

G 4420

GGG

9.00°

11288

4420

WOMEN WR

FUNCTION SPACE B 2120 SF

18 .00 ° 18 .00°

P DN RAM 12 1:

R20

FIRST AID 230 SF 9.00°

FUNCTION SPACE A 6760 SF

CONCESSION 540 SF

HHH MEN WR

RAMP DN 1:12

CONCESSION 550 SF

H

FAMILY WR JANITOR 100 SF 110 SF

4793

0° 8.0 °1 18.00

WOMENS WR 530 SF

WR

R11 1

9132

WR BASKETBALL DRESSING ROOM

J

MEETING ROOM A 200 SF

R19 WHIRLPOOL 110 SF

DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS

27425

R18 L

PLAYER LOUNGE 400 SF

10790

OFFICE 180 SF

R12

PROMO 80 SF

SERVICE CORRIDOR 850 SF

WARMING PANTRY 1110 SF

KITCHEN STAIR C

F&B STORAGE

ZAMBONI

OFFICE 120 SF

DRESSING ROOM 1 740 SF

LIQUOR STORAGE 170 SF

STORAGE 840 SF

MEETING ROOM C 330 SF

Keyplan:

VISITING TEAM DRESSING ROOM 610 SF

CLINIC 480 SF

DRESSING ROOM 2 730 SF

DRESSING ROOM 3 720 SF

6258 STAFF CHANGING 250 SF PLAYER CHANGING 360 SF

MEETING ROOM B 220 SF RAMP DN 1:12

MANAGER OFFICE

CLINIC STORAGE 110 SF HOCKEY DRESSING ROOM Option Conflict SF

E

-400

EQUIP. ROOM 1000 SF

SAUNA 90 SF

CATERING 550 SF

Date

THE DRAWING AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE THE PROPERTY OF MADISON SQUARE GARDEN, L.P. AND CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THERE BE ANY UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION, IN ANY FORM.

WR OFFICIALS OFFICIALS

Date 1

Description

CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

FUNCTION SPACE C 2510 SF

STORAGE 130 SF

SKATE SHARPENING 120 SF EQUIP. MANAGER 120 SF

Revision 1

No.

GREEN ROOM 920 SF

UP

OPS STORAGE 2960 SF

ICE PLANT 1210 SF

GARBAGE / RECYCLING 460 SF

R13 WARNING: It is a violation of the law Drawn: for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, to Author alter this item/document in any way.

LAUNDRY

SECURITY

VIDEO/MEETING ROOM 250 SF

DRESSING ROOM 4 670 SF

Checked:

Checker Date initiated:

OFFICE 170 SF

OFFICE 170 SF

OFFICE 170 SF

28-MAY-2014

M 2 A-401

4 A-301

4

LEVEL 1

R14

R15

O Brisbin Brook Beynon, Architects, 2009 C SCI Architect, P.C., 2009 O Sheet. No. C

RAMP UP

Ground Floor Plan

R16

Scale:

1 : 200 Project No.

1402

92

A-200

12/08/2014 9:06:39 AM

Sheet Name:

R17


Plaza - Exterior Entrance

93


Typical Suite 14 DUNCAN STREET TORONTO, ON M5H 3G8

1

1

2

3

6

A-401

R5

R4

R3

R6

Y

7

R7

TEL (416) 591 8999

8

FAX (416) 591 9087

R8

A1 7071 BAYERS ROAD, SUITE 5007 HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, B3L 2C2

SERVICE RM

TEL (902) 422 4587

KITCHEN

RESTAURANT

WOMENS WR BAR

BB MENS WR

150 TRUMBUL STREET, 3RD FLOOR HARTFORD, CT 06103 USA

JAN.

B

TEL

R9 ELEC

ELEC

AA

AA

R2

Maricor

GROUP SALES

77 Vaughan Harvey Blvd, Suite 200 Moncton, NB E1C 0K2 Bus: (506) 857-8880 Fax: (506) 859-8393 www.mcw.com

GROUP SALES

200 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 7th FLOOR TORONTO, ON M5H 3C6

SUITE 12

SUITE 1

TEL (416) 477 5832

VIP BALCONY

R10

SUITE 13

SUITE 2

R1 C

2 BLOOR STREET EAST, SUITE 2100 TORONTO, ON M4W 1A8

SUITE 3

TEL (416) 920-5100

SUITE 14

FAX (416) 922-8768

MENS WR

SUITE 15

SUITE 4

77 ROONEY CRESCENT MONCTON, NB E1E 4M4

WOMENS WR

TEL (506) 858 7180

D

FAX (506) 858 0742

4

1

SUITE 5

6

A-700

SUITE 16 A-700

3

5

SUITE 17

SUITE 6 DN

2

E

A-401

2

SUITE 7

X

1

MEDIA

A-402

A-301

CLUB SEATING SHOWN HATCHED

2

A-402

X

F SUITE 8

SUITE 18

SUITE 9

SUITE 19

G SUITE 10

SUITE 20

SUITE 21

SUITE 11

H R11

R20 HC SEATING

HC PLATFORM

No.

J

SERVICE

HOSPITALITY ROOM

A/V ROOM

Description

Date

CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

SERVICE

DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS

R19 WOMENS WR

THE DRAWING AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE THE PROPERTY OF MADISON SQUARE GARDEN, L.P. AND CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THERE BE ANY UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION, IN ANY FORM.

R12

GROUP SALES MENS WR

MENS WR

WOMENS WR

WILL CALL 110 SF

STAFF LOCKERS

W/R 180 SF

RECEPTION 310 SF

BB ELECTRICAL ROOM

W/R 180 SF

MECHANICAL ROOM

R18

CONFERECE ROOM 360 SF

PRINTER KITCHEN 40 SF 190 SF

UP UP SERVER ROOM 70 SF FILE STORAGE 190 SF

ADMIN OFFICES 5150 SF

PANTRY 1190 SF

Keyplan:

MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE 180 SF 180 SF 180 SF 180 SF 230 SF

R13

L WARNING: It is a violation of the law Drawn: for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, to Author alter this item/document in any way. Checked:

Checker Date initiated:

M R16

4

R15

R14

Sheet Name:

LEVEL 2 AND MEZZ.

4 A-301

1

Level 2 1 : 200

Scale:

1 : 200 Project No.

1402

C Brisbin Brook Beynon, Architects, 2009 O C SCI Architect, P.C., 2009 O Sheet. No.

A-201

12/08/2014 9:07:03 AM

R17

94


VIP Mezzanine Y 1

1

2

6763

3

9000

A-401

26800

6

33400

R5

R4

R3 30756

R6

1200

7

6764

R7

8

7300

R8

A1

+/- 0

11500

RETAIL 3750 SF

VESTIBULE 1070 SF

RETAIL 3760 SF

BRICK

BB B 34101

FAM. WR 90 SF

P.C.

P.C.

AA

FUTURE COMMERCIAL OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING

STAIR A

R9

STAIR B

CONCRETE PAVERS

ELEC

ELEC WOMENS WR 510 SF

21168

R2

FAM. WR 100 SF

MENS WR 480 SF

CONCESSION 600 SF

SUITE ENTRY 390 SF

CONCESSION 600 SF

UP

SUITE/VIP ENTRANCE

FAMILY WR 110 SF

STOR

WOMENS WASHROOM 650 SF

MENS WR 610 SF 4793

C

BRICK

R10

7402 CONCOURSE

R1

CONCRETE PAVERS

LOBBY 860 SF

11288

P.C.

4420

TICKETING 550 SF

4420

SUITE/VIP DROP-OFF OFFICE

D WOMENS WR 690 SF 10300

MENS WR 510 SF

P.C.

CONCOURSE 43040 SF

POTENTIAL LOCATION OF TEMPORARY E NHL-SIZE ICE SURFACE

10300

EQ

E

X

CONCESSION 720 SF

2

1

CONCESSION 710 SF

A-402

A-402

2 EQ

A-301

P.C.

F

PRE-FUNCTION SPACE 6050 SF

10300

P.C.

CONCOURSE

-500

MENS WR 510 SF

WOMEN WR 700 SF

G FUNCTION SPACE B 2120 SF

4420

9.00°

11288

4420

DN RAMP 1:12

18.0 0°

18.00°

FAMILY WR JANITOR 100 SF 110 SF

FIRST AID 230 SF 9.00°

FUNCTION SPACE A 6760 SF

CONCESSION 540 SF

RAMP DN 1:12

0° 18.0

R20

4793

18.00°

WOMENS WR 530 SF

CONCESSION 550 SF

H

WR

R11

9132

WR BASKETBALL DRESSING ROOM

GREEN ROOM 920 SF

UP

FUNCTION SPACE C 2510 SF

STORAGE 130 SF

J WR OFFICIALS OFFICIALS

SKATE SHARPENING 120 SF EQUIP. MANAGER 120 SF

R19 WHIRLPOOL 110 SF 27425

HOCKEY DRESSING ROOM Option Conflict SF

SAUNA 90 SF

R18 L

PLAYER LOUNGE 400 SF

10790

OFFICE 180 SF

OFFICE 170 SF

OFFICE 120 SF VISITING TEAM DRESSING ROOM 610 SF

CLINIC 480 SF

DRESSING ROOM 2 730 SF

DRESSING ROOM 3 720 SF OPS STORAGE 2960 SF

ICE PLANT 1210 SF

GARBAGE / RECYCLING 460 SF

LAUNDRY

SECURITY

VIDEO/MEETING ROOM 250 SF

DRESSING ROOM 4 670 SF

OFFICE 170 SF

2 A-401

4

4

R14

R15 RAMP UP

R16

A-301

95

SERVICE CORRIDOR 850 SF

WARMING PANTRY 1110 SF

STAIR C DRESSING ROOM 1 740 SF

M R17

R12

PROMO 80 SF

ZAMBONI

6258

OFFICE 170 SF

E

RAMP DN 1:12 MANAGER OFFICE KITCHEN F&B STORAGE

STAFF CHANGING 250 SF PLAYER CHANGING 360 SF

CATERING 550 SF

-400

EQUIP. ROOM 1000 SF CLINIC STORAGE 110 SF

R13

LIQUOR STORAGE 170 SF

STORAG 840 SF


96


MADISON SQUARE GARDEN LUXURY LOUNGE & BAR PROPOSAL

The Madison Square Garden Luxury Lounge & Bar Proposal is ongoing small

conceptual project. Working closely with a Principal and Senior Designer, I was responsible for producing floor plan and section renderings that illustrated new concepts for the project, including space, light, materials, and atmosphere.

97


Ground Floor

2nd Floor

98


3rd Floor

4th Floor

99


Concept A - Section

Concept A - Perspective Section

100


Concept B - Section

Concept B - Perspective Section

101


ALVARO

QUISPE | PORTFOLIO

M.Arch | 416.878.7189 | quispe.c.alvaro@gmail.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.