E-Paper PDF 15 October (KHI)

Page 1

CMYK

Tuesday, 15 October, 2019 I 15 Safar-ul-Muzaffar, 1441 I Rs 17.00 I Vol X No 105 I 16 Pages I Karachi Edition

Royal couple lands in Pakistan g

United Kingdom’s Prince William and Kate middleton arrived in islamabad on monday night, beginning a five-day visit that Will focUs on boosting ties

‘InconvenIent truth got JustIce IsA In trouble’ g

coUnsel says JUdge being targeted over faizabad verdict that qUestioned role of secUrity agencies in tlP’s sit-in ISLAMABAD Staff RepoRt

A

STORY ON BACK PAGE

ihc refers ecP appointments issue to parliament

AZADI MARCH

Pm forms body for talks with JUi-f

PML-N to follow Nawaz’s orders STORY ON PAGE 02

STORIES ON PAGES 03 & 05

Pm moves against inflation, calls cms’ meeting STORY ON PAGE 03

Anti-govt movement from Oct 18, says Bilawal STORY ON PAGE 02

fatf ‘satisfied’ over Pakistan’s action plan compliance

STORY ON PAGE 12

India partially restores cellular services in Kashmir STORY ON BACK PAGE

s a full court bench of the supreme Court (sC) took up a case against Justice Qazi Faez Isa on Monday, his counsel Muneer A Malik claimed the reference against the sC judge stemmed out of the “inconvenient truth and observations” made by the judge in the Faizabad verdict. During the hearing, Malik told the court that a particular mindset was targeting the top court judge through coordinated efforts after the verdict. A 10-judge full court led by Justice Umar Ata Bandial is hearing a set of petitions challenging the presidential reference filed against Justice Isa over alleged non-disclosure of assets in his wealth statement. The verdict had questioned the role of security agencies in brokering an agreement between the far-right Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) and the government, the counsel said, adding that

g

sc JUdges qUestion motive of Pleas filed by Pti, mqm-P against JUstice isa after faizadbad verdict

following the verdict multiple pleas were filed against the judge. “Eight review petitions were filed against the sC decision. The petitions were part of a coordinated exercise as they stated that the judgement ‘demoralised’ the armed forces,” he said. Advocate Malik said that both the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) had filed applications against Justice Isa in the aftermath of the Faizabad sit-in case verdict. Both parties had raised the same type of questions in their pleas. Prime Minister Imran Khan belongs to the PTI while the law minister [Farogh Naseem] belongs to the MQM-P, he said. The federal government initiated the reference through the law ministry. In a comment on the applications filed by the both parties, Justice Faisal Arab said it appeared that both the parties had exchanged drafts before filing the petitions and used the same computers, whereas Justice Mansoor Ali shah said that the same font was used in both

the applications. He raised a question about the gap between the verdict on Faizabad sit-in and the reference against Justice Isa. Advocate Munir said that the court received an application by Waheed Dogar on April 10 while the Faizabad sit-in case was decided on February 26. “The review petitions, filed in March, are still pending. In April, a complaint was filed in the Asset Recovery Unit alleging non-disclosure of foreign assets in the wealth statement of Justice Isa,” Malik informed the full bench. Talking about the assets that the reference claimed Justice Isa had failed to disclose, Advocate Malik said Justice Isa’s wife had purchased the first flat in 2004, while the petitioner became a judge in 2009. His assets were verified when he was sworn in as a judge, said the lawyer. The second and third properties were bought in 2013 by his offspring when the judge was serving as the chief justice of the Balochistan High Court.

CONTINUED ON PAGE 02


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.