July 2001 Edition - Access Press

Page 1

*

P Directory Of Organizations — Page 10

Inside The ADA at 11 — p. 8 IDEA at 26 — p. 9

July 10, 2001

1

“We will treat Americans with disabilities as people to be respected, rather than problems to be confronted.”

— President George W. Bush

Non-profit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Mpls. MN Permit No. 4766

Volume 12, Number 7

SOURCES

RESOURCES

July 10, 2001

THE AFTERMATH OF GARRETT: MN TAKES THE LEAD IN WAIVING STATE IMMUNITY by Kathleen Hagen

R

Legislative Session Review: Budget Means Big Changes For Disability Community by John Tschida

A

voiding a government shutdown by the narrowest of margins, state lawmakers adopted a new health and human services budget June 29. The proposal includes many changes that will affect the disability community. What follows is a cursory description of the bill’s major components. Please watch future issues of Access Press for details on the following and other subjects. Direct care staff crisis: Cost of living increases of 3 percent were earmarked in each of the next two fiscal years for nursing homes and home and community based providers. Workers at Intermediate Care Facilities for Persons with Mental Retardation (ICF-MRs) and day training and habilitation providers will see 3.5 percent gains during the same period. The funds are designed to stem the flow of workers leaving these critical jobs for more lucrative paychecks elsewhere. Two-thirds of these dollars must be spent on salary or compensation, which includes wages and health premium costs incurred by employers.

*

An additional Medical Assistance rate increase was approved for skilled nursing facilities that will pay an increased per diem rate for the first 90 days of an individual’s stay. The hike, 20 percent for the first 30 days and 10 percent for days 60-90, will especially aid facilities such as Courage Center and Trevilla of Robbinsdale with a high percentage of residents with disabilities covered by Medical Assistance. Medical Assistance for Employed Persons with Disabilities (MA-EPD): A new premium structure will take effect November 1, 2001, for those enrolled in this state program which allows people with disabilities to work, yet still retain Medical Assistance coverage. While less draconian than the governor’s original proposal, the change will increase monthly premiums for an estimated 4,000 individuals with disabilities. Those with incomes at 100 percent of Federal Poverty Guideline (FPG) will pay a premium equal to 1 percent of total income. Graduated increases will cap at 7.5 percent of total income for

those earning 300 percent of FPG and above. Previously, only individuals earning 200 percent of FPG faced a premium charge, at a flat rate of 10 percent of income earned above this level. Individuals enrolled in the MA-EPD program who must discontinue work due to a medical condition will remain eligible for the program for four months. Previously, individuals were disenrolled after two months. The change will prevent a spend-down from occurring until the fifth month after a work cessation. Additionally, those who leave the program will have any accumulated assets frozen for one year. This will allow for any savings to stay intact—avoiding the need to liquidate savings to meet the MA $3,000 asset limit—in the event of a work separation. Income standard increase: Individuals earning up to 100 percent of FPG will be able to retain their monthly earnings (up to about $716) without spending down their income in order to qualify for Budget - cont. on p. 9

eaders will remember the Supreme Court’s decision in University of Alabama Board of Trustees vs. Garrett discussed in an article in the March 2001 Access Press. In that decision, the Supreme Court said states were immune from private lawsuits by state employees for monetary damages. This decision followed a line of decisions limiting rights under other Civil Rights and Labor Statutes. Legislators and activists in various states have tried to come up with ways to restore some of the rights removed by these decisions. Remember that these decisions were interpreting—more conservatively than previous decisions had—the 11th Amendment of the United States Constitution barring suit in federal court against states. Generally, in order for states to be said to have waived their immunity they must meet one of three tests. The first way for states to have waived immunity to be sued, would be that the Congress must have expressly intended by the legislation to waive states’s immunity to a federal lawsuit, and the Congress must have had the authority to waive such immunity. In Garrett and other recent decisions involving other Civil Rights Statutes, the Supreme Court said Congress intended to waive immunity to lawsuits against the states, but that Congress didn’t have the authority to waive such immunity. The second way states could waive immunity was to implicitly waive immunity by accepting funding under federal statutes. For example,

states which accepted federal funding for public education might have waived their right to claim immunity to suits under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Minnesota Only State to Waive Immunity The third way states could waive immunity to be sued is by expressly stating in legislation that they consented to be sued under specificallystated federal statutes. Several states have introduced bills which, if passed, would waive this immunity. Minnesota is the only state which has passed legislation this term which may alleviate some of the problem. This bill was one of the few actually signed by the Governor during the 2001 legislative session. Minnesota’s legislative approach differed from that of the other three states which got bills before their legislature for a vote. I will discuss the bills in the other states first. Rhode Island The most sweeping legislation was introduced by Rhode Island. Apparently, their approach was to try to fix all the problems which could occur with any civil rights statute before the Supreme Court reduced any of those rights further. Their legislation stated, in part, “The state consents to be sued in state or federal court by its employees and any other proper parties seeking to enforce rights and obtain remedies afforded by the following federal statutes and their regulations when the United States Congress has indicated its intent that such statutes be applicable to the

states:...” [This was followed by a comprehensive list of civil rights statutes including: the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Equal Pay Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, Sections 1981 through 1988 of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Religious Lands Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and various whistleblower remedies under environmental protection statutes.] The bill went on to include another section whereby the state would agree to be sued in federal court regarding all of their state civil rights statutes. This was a wonderful bill from a plaintiff’s point of view, but it probably scared legislators to death, and it didn’t pass. However, with such inclusive language, Rhode Island (and some other states) have started the process of creating coalitions among various groups affected by civil rights statutes which may lead to passage of some portion of that legislation at some future time. California California’s approach to this legislation was similar to Rhode Island’s, but not nearly as broad in scope. California seems to have paid special attention to the possibility of eroding Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The bill read, in part, “(a) The state of California consents to be sued in state or federal court by any person Garrett - cont. on p. 13

*


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.