www.accesspress.org
June 10, 2007
1
History Note
Inside
“I know of no country in which there is so little independence of mind and real freedom of discussion as in America.”
■ Portraying Disability—p. 4 ■ Hot Weather Tips—p. 10 ■ VA Tech/Mental Health—p. 12
— Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859) Page 2 Nonprofit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Mpls. MN Permit No. 4766
Volume 18, Number 6
Minnesota’s Disability
Community Newspaper
June 10, 2007
Sticks And Stones Local Organizations Take Offense and Respond Quickly to Title of Brave New Workshop’s Latest Show by Sherry Gray
Hennepin Avenue passersby read the Brave New Workshop’s poster for their current show, “Rise of the Celebretards.” The title has provoked protest from a wide spectrum of individuals and disability organizations.
C
an it really be trendy to use the “R” word? Apparently so, at least in pop culture. Certain celebrities, their media watchers, the pop music scene, and numerous internet blogs are using the word “retard,” alone or
The old adage is that words cannot hurt, but groups given negative labels know differently. Words can and do lead to hurtful things like limited access to economic and social opportunities and denial of political rights. That’s why there is another trend emerging: a nationwide reaction of self-advocates, their friends and families against this usage of the “R” word.
as a suffix to other words, to mock people viewed as foolish. Last month, Minneapolisbased theater troop Brave New Workshop (BNW) joined in, titling their show that spoofs celebrities “Rise of the Quick Response Celebretards.” Response to the offensive title
came quickly; BNW was deluged by e-mails and letters from outraged individuals and groups. For example, Mound resident George Linkert wrote on his Web page, “This is wrong …. use of the word retard in this context is inappropriate, insensitive, insulting, and offensive.” In a letter to the BNW, many of Minnesota’s leading disability-rights organizations weighed in, “Using the word “retard” in any reference legitimizes the oppression and
HHS Bill: Mixed Results Both Positive and Disappointing Results in Health and Human Services from the 2007 Legislative Session by Anne L. Henry, MN Disability Law Center
T
he 2007 Minnesota Legislative Session ended dramatically; votes on major funding bills happened at the last possible minute, because negotiations with the governor failed to reach final agreements in most areas. From the beginning of the session, efforts to improve services and funding for persons with disabilities faced a number of serious problems: the available revenue to restore cuts from the past four years or fund new services was
very tight, the governor opposed any revenue or tax increases to fund services or programs, and the House and Senate did not have veto-proof majorities to override the governor’s promised vetoes of new revenue. Although there were many disappointments for persons with disabilities, the legislative session did produce some positive changes in the Health and Human Services area:
Significant Improvements for Mental Health Services Adopted A very significant effort to improve mental health treatment throughout Minnesota’s service system for children and adults was successful this year. The resulting legislation, proposed in the governor’s budget, adds mental health services to state health care programs, establishes a demonstration project using managed care and increases in funding to numerous grant programs
and for infrastructure needs. This effort, the result of over three years of work, was supported broadly by mental health consumers, advocates, providers, as well as the Department of Human Services (DHS), the governor and many legislators. The notable changes provide $34 million in increased funding for mental health services over the biennium. (A fuller article on these changes is coming in next month’s issue.) HHS - cont. on p. 15
ridicule many people experience on a daily basis. When you attempt to ridicule [celebrities] by identifying them as “retarded,” you also ridicule those who have been so labeled throughout their lives and make more difficult their struggle to be valued for their contributions and commitments ….” The letter was signed by Self-Advocates Minnesota (network of 30 selfadvocacy groups), Advocating Change Together (ACT), The Arc of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration (ICI), Minnesota Disability Law Center, Minnesota Governor’s Council on Developmental Disabilities, Minnesota State Council on Disability, People First Minnesota, and Access Press. Kim Keprios, CEO of Arc Greater Twin Cities, wrote to the BNW, “A history of using countless offensive words in sketches and titles does not justify slurring vulnerable people and using them as the butt of the ‘joke.’ By using the word, the Brave New Workshop appears uninformed, close minded and/or insensitive. Worse yet, some people may conclude that calling others retards is acceptable social behavior.” On May 13, Star Tribune col-
umnist Doug Grow (“Brave New Workshop’s Satire Title Hits a Nerve”) asked if the BNW has “gone a step beyond too far?” A Pioneer Press editorial on May 18 (“A Bully Word”) called the BNW show title “stupid, unfunny, and offensive.” Responses also came from outside Minnesota. This author posted the show title on SibNet (listserv for and about adult brothers and sisters of people with special health, developmental, and emotional needs at www.siblingsup port.org/) provoking protest e-mails to the BNW from around the country. Don Meyer, director of the Sibling Support Project in Seattle and a former special education teacher in Hopkins, Minnesota, wrote, “As a young teacher….one of our favorite entertainment venues was Dudley Rigg’s “Brave New Workshop.”… I could count on comedy that was, well, brave and new. Consequently, it pains me to see you are staging a show that is called ‘Rise of the Celebretards.’ If you don’t know how offensive this title is to people with disabilities and their families, try this: replace the “retard” in CeleSticks/Stones - cont. on p. 11
DISABILITY ISSUES ON THE AGENDA AT THE STATE CAPITOL ill: B S ults s HH e d R ve & e x i M siti sults
A Good Start, But . . .
Tha t’ Zero s It? for T Adv ra ocat Frus es E nsit?
Special Education Funding Improves; nd tr Shortfalls Remain (p2) 2 010 ated as Sessio Plan 1 n Govern Stal 4 by or Vote ls (p s ‘No’ on Vo e 3)
po g re n h t n i o t B in ppo & Huma a s i d e ealth from th H n i ting A ices lative v r ccess e R S eforms gis e l 7 ) (p3) 200 on (p1 i s Living Right? ses
CILs Meet Unprecedented Success at Capitol (p3)
or M o N sets rs n u S slato
r l! overno r i G G s e o s G es Old Pr r) 12-Yea the Bill’ (p4 n to ‘Sig
le A Trip To T b a t he Cap S Ci itol Give (p8) tizens with B D G r a a i O i n n I Advoc SC i acy Ex njury (p8) Leg ing to M p erience d Fun