Selected Works from 2010-2012 by Tony Maiolatesi

anthonyMAIOLATESI SELECTED WORKS FROM 2010-2012

Projected

“Charleston After the Crosstown”

[Field of Vision] In collaboration with: Sally Morrow Landscape can be interpreted as an expanse of land observed in a single look, similar to the concept of field of view in film. Literally, the landscape can be an arrangement of vegetation in a changing topography that sequences and frames points of interest. Figuratively, it is the collection of environmental and urban ecologies within the city as a network. To overcome the striation in the city that occurs at the riverâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s walled bank, we aim to enhance Florenceâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s present urban ecologies of

vehicular and pedestrian traffic, landmark networks, and diurnal programing by blending them into a more efficient and cohesive system. By drawing off of the axis of the Uffizi and introducing a dual program space at Piazza Giudici we are utilizing existing site conditions to create participation with Florenceâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s more established landmarks. Program within the video archive is organized utilizing a controlled fluidity, influenced by the gestural curves of the river bank.

San Lorenzo

Santa Maria del Fiore

Piazza della Repubblica Orsanmichele

Piazza Signoria

Uffizi Gallery

Field of View

A FIELD OF VISION | STUDIO | FALL 2012 | DeRIVA

Exploring Spatial Phenomena Through Film STRATIFY

SINK

SYNTHESIZE

REFLECT

SHEAR

SUPERIMPOSE

Drive-In Movie Theater/Parking

A FIELD OF VISION | STUDIO | FALL 2012 | DeRIVA

SITE STRATEGIES

Variable Soil Depth

Trees Myrtle: 1 meter Olive: 4.5 meters

View Lungarno

Shrubs Boxwood: 1meter Heather: 1 meter Juniper: 1.5 meters

Flowers

Grasses

Herbs

Aster: .5 meter Bougainvillea: 1.5 meters Oleander: 2 meters

Blue Oat Grass Blue Sedge Autumn Moor

Rosemary: .5 meter Sage: .5 meter Thyme: Less than .5 meter

A FIELD OF VISION | STUDIO | FALL 2012 | DeRIVA

FORMAL DEVELOPMENT

E-W Section

Material Manipulation

Plan K.

B. A.

G. G. G.

E. D.

F. H.

Lower Landscape Plan 1:250 A. Projection Viewing Field B. Theater Seating C. Cafe D. Outdoor Cafe Seating E. Lobby F. Workshop G. Seminar Room H. Bookstore I. Restroom J. Elevator

K. B. A. A.

J. K.

J. K. F.

J. C.

I. F.

H. G.

River Level Plan 1:250 A. Lobby B. Auditorium C. Viewing Room D. Gallery Space E. Sunken Garden F. Seminar Room G. Archive H. Studio I. Stair to Parking Pavilion J. Restroom K. Elevator

ARCH A RC CH HI E

FIEELD FIELD LD OOFF IIMAGES MAGEESS AUD A U D ITTO ORIU AUDITORIUM AU UD TOR Entrance Section

Image Archive Lobby

DIGII LAAB B

STUDIO S TUDIO

GARAGEE> GARAGE> EE>

Design School Section

Main Archive and Projection Space

ORGANIZATION AND TECTONICS These curves are delineated by multiple paths of circulation which allow for simultaneous viewing opportunities across multiple spaces providing a richer experience and encouraging moments of interaction. The Image Archive is appropriately represented by such a landscape strategy because the content of the archive itself exhibits similar qualitiesâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;the films in the collection showcase the impact of architecture on its surroundings and its relationships to those who inhabit it.

A FIELD OF VISION | STUDIO | FALL 2012 | DeRIVA

Piazza Addition Overlooking Water

A FIELD OF VISION | STUDIO | FALL 2012 | DeRIVA

1. strengthen King St.

2. pedestrian mews

3. bike path

Charleston After the Cross-Town In collaboration with: Andrew Acevedo & Vera Tong

4. street lamps

5. off-street parking

6. strengthen Meeting St.

“[Infrastructures] serve serve the public but are not public space. Outside the realm of direct public control, they are instead under the umbrella of the collective authority. They are externalized often vacant spaces--perpetually out of bounds.” --Filip Tejchman, PRAXIS

CHARLESTON AFTER THE CROSS-TOWN | STUDIO/COMPETITION | FALL 2010 | MUNLY

Concept

Impact pact cctt

HUB

CROSSTOWN

RECONNECT

Mapping Charleston Infrastructure is commonly perceived as a linear system that exists to regulate and organize movement within a city. It is constructed when the need arises and its intrinsic planned obsolescence makes it easy to replace or dispose of altogether. In Charleston, the Septima Clark Expressway, better known as the cross-town, was constructed in the early 70’s to promote movement in the city during a time when the surreptitious emphasis of mobility accommodated growth out of the city. The physical and psychological effects of the cross-town are still apparent today, and continue to become exacerbated through a perpetual confidence in archaic highway ideology. A veritable geographic chasm on the urban

landscape of Charleston, the cross-town highway bifurcates neighborhoods, lowers property values, and presents an uncomfortable juxtaposition in programmatic scale. However, its formal and spatial organization creates an opportunity to ameliorate these problems. With regard to the concerns of Charlestonians, we challenge the notion that a single intermodal “hub” could succeed in promoting successful social imperative, and instead shift to focus on the potential of adaptive infrastructures to instill a stronger sense of community, promote healthy lifestyle initiatives, and reduce dependence on the automobile.

2030

2010

A B

Traffic Count in 2008

1,362,000

Crime Rates per Neighborhood

Low

High

CARTA Bus Routes

Others

Existing

Proposed LRT Route

Proposed

Old Southern Railway

Cancelled

A, B, C

Remediated Dead Ends

Cross Town

1. decreased vehicular traffic 2. safer neighborhoods 3. merging of east and west Charleston 4. accessibility across all of Charleston

Dead ends

CHARLESTON AFTER THE CROSS-TOWN | STUDIO/COMPETITION | FALL 2010 | MUNLY

TRA TR TRA TRANSITIONAL RAN ANS AN NSIT SIITTITTIO IO IONA ONA ON NNAL AALL ZZONE ZOON ZON ONE NNEE

10 1 0

1 1. low power lines i s 2. empty lot 3. dead end 4. unihabitable 5. empty lot

6. 6 und undefined undeefifined edge 7. 7 light li ht ppollution 8. traffic congestion 9. noise pollution 10. scale incongruency

A Maple St.

Maple St.

Poplar St.

Riker St.

Adaptive Infrastructure Running between King Street and Meeting Street, the cross-town is located along the historic spine of the peninsula in a â&#x20AC;&#x153;transitional zoneâ&#x20AC;? where the city plans to strengthen with improved modes of transit and infill development. Increased light rail use will cause a major reduction of vehicular traffic, alleviating several lanes along the cross-town and allowing them to be retrofitted with housing, commercial use, and elevated parks. Overpasses provide shelter for transit nodes underneath, as well as safe corridors for jogging and bike trails. Where dead ends once created boundaries, new east-west pedestrian streets promote the cross-pollination between neighborhoods and the location for essential program and cultural events. The playful material articulation of these streets defines the hierarchy of programmatic intersections and breathes new character into previously neglected areas of Charleston.

Congress

S t.

Spell St.

9 7 8

CHARLESTON AFTER THE CROSS-TOWN | STUDIO/COMPETITION | FALL 2010 | MUNLY

Artifact & Catalyst Detroit

ĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇ

50% 5

ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ ǁŝůů ďĞ 50 years Žƌ ŽůĚĞƌ 2005

85 and older

65- 74

75- 84

60 - 64

55 - 59

45 - 54

35 - 44

25 - 34

20 - 24

15 - 19

10 - 14

5-9

2008

under 5

Focusing on the city at different scales (S,M,L,XL) certain condions can be understood and examined which allow for critical issues to emerge. By analyzing these conditions, or artifacts, in the context with a catalyst (ie. an aging population) the opportunity to intervene presents itself. However, sometimes this data can sometimes disprove hypotheses, requiring a different approach. The following diagrams analyze neighborhood conditions related to the aging population, and more specifically the “grandparent and grandfamily population” in Detroit defined by the US Census.

Looking at Detroit’s Aging Population

ŽŵŵƵŶŝƟƚĞƐ

ŐŝŶŐ WŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ

pharmacies groceries banks

58 51 54

30 29

32 69

84 39 41

31 83

77 55

53 37

100

101 26 65

72 107

89 90

42 95

98 50

87 86

67 19 18 4 5 91 59

14 6 7

66 17

34 35

under 5

23 24 62 22 47 33

11 9

103

DOWNTOWN 1,400 to 1,790 1,050 to 1,399 700 to 1,049 350 to 699 0 to 349

11%

ŽĨ grandparents ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞŝƌ ŐƌĂŶĚĐŚŝ

2008

2006

25 - 34

20 - 24

15 - 19

5-9

2005

10 - 14

2008

ARTIFACT AND CATALYST | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | MUNLY

Detroit

Detroit D etroit

42% grandparents ĂƌĞ ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞ ĨŽƌ grandparents g randparents ĂƌĞ ƌĞƐƉŽ ra ĂƌĞ ƌĞƐƉŽ their grandchildren

1 15%

ϭϲ͕ϮϴϮ ƵŶŵĂƌƌŝĞĚ

ϭϬ͕ϲϰϭ ŝŶ ůĂďŽƌ ĨŽƌĐĞ 8,021 poverty

40%

ŽĨ ŝŶƚĞƌŐĞŶĞƌĂƟŽŶĂů ƐŝƚƵĂƟŽŶƐ ůĂƐƚ 5 ůůĂƐƚ ĂƐƚ 5 years years or or more mor

married 10,454

ƌĞƟƌĞĚ ϭϲ͕Ϭϵϱ ĞƟƌĞĚ ϭϲ Ϭϵϱ

above a bove p poverty overty 1 18,715 8 715

ϵ͕ϱϵϴ ƌĞŶƚĞƌͲŽĐĐƵƉŝĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ

owner-occupied housing 17,1 17,138

ϭϲ͕ϮϴϮ ƵŶŵĂƌƌŝĞĚ ϭϬ͕ϲϰϭ ŝŶ ůĂďŽƌ ĨŽƌĐĞ 8,021 poverty

above poverty 18,715

ϵ͕ϱϵϴ ƌĞŶƚĞƌͲŽĐĐƵƉŝĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ

In 2030,

married 10,454

ƌĞƟƌĞĚ ϭϲ͕Ϭϵϱ

owner-occupied housing 17,138

50%

ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ ǁŝůů ďĞ ŽǀĞƌ ƚŚĞ ĂŐĞ ŽĨ 50 by the year 2030.

ĂƌĞ ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞ ŝůĚƌĞŶ

47,039

85 and older

75 - 84

65 - 74

55 - 64

45 - 54

35 - 44

46,566

8 Mile M le Ro Road/ Road ad// S State Staatee Fairgrounds

Bloomtown Project Black Rock Arts Foundation Awarded: 2010 2010: $5,000

Motown Historical Museum Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $30,000 2007: $25,000

7M Mil Mile le R Road Roooaad

Mosaic Youth Theater

Deploying Creative Solution

Kresge foundation Awarded: 2005-2010 2010: $100,000 2007: $50,000 2005 $500,000

In its current condition, Woodward Avenue between downtown and 8 Mile Road is littered with approximately 50 vacant and underutilized spaces, ranging from oversized parking lots to empty parcels and even derelict structures. Vacancies in Detroit have become the focus of artists, both domestic and international, representing a new frontier of urban renewal in this blighted city.

Detroit Historical Society Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $100,000 2007: $65,000

The Scarab Club

McNichols McN M cNic Niic N ich chol ols l Road ls Roaadd R

Kresge foundation Awarded: 2008-2010 2010: $30,000 2008: $30,000

Museum of African American History Kresge foundation Awarded: 2003-2010 2010: $160,000 2010: $9,450 2007 $80,000 2004: $2,500,000

Detroit Science Center

Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $140,000 2010: $75,000 2007: $60,000 2007: $1,250,000

Becoming a veritable palette for creative statements and grassroots initiatives, such as Tyree Guyton’s Heidelburg Project and Ellen Donnelly’s Bloom Town, Detroit’s future relies on a synthesis between bottom-up initiatives by local residents and top-down approaches provided by commercial and governmental interventions. Interestingly enough, both of these aforementioned projects have received funding in the form of grants from the Black Rock Arts Foundation and the Kresge Foundation.

Preservation Wayne Kresge foundation Awarded: 2010 2010: $40,000

Detroit Artists Market Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $40,000 2007: $20,000

Heritage Works Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $18,000 2009: $10,000 2007: $5,000

MOCA

Kresge foundation years: 2007-2010 2010: $100,000 2009: $60,000 2007: $50,000

Vsa Arts of Michigan

Kresge foundation Awarded: 2010 2010: $30,000

In fact, the Kresge foundation, located in Troy, Michigan, has distributed approximately $250,000,000 throughout Michigan, with 80% of funds reaching Wayne County, and 8% of that total being reserved for arts and cultural programs. Conveniently, many of these programs in Detroit are locate in close proximity to Woodward Avenue, therefore a synthesis of these initiatives with the future Woodward light rail would create many new opportunities to ameliorate the divested conditions in the city.

Detroit Symphony Orchestra Awarded: 2003-2010 2010: $200,000 2009: $300,000 2007: $100,000 2003: $2,000,000

Heidelburg Project Awarded: 2010 2010: $50,000

Cultural Alliance of Southeast Michigan

Awarded: 2010 2010: $250,000

Insideout Inc.

Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $80,000 2007: $35,000

Michigan Opera Theater Kresge foundation years: 2003-2010 2010: $200,000 2007: $100,000 2003: $3,000,000

Music Hall Center for Performing Arts Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $160,000 2007: $80,000

Arts League Michigan

MLLK MLK M KB Bo Boulevard Boulevard/Mack Boulevard/ oulllevvvaaar ou ooulevard/ ard rdd/ d//M d/M M Avenue

Awarded: 2007 2007: $25,000

Detroit International Jazz Festival

80%

Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $70,000 2007: $35,000 2003: $3,000,000

Sphinx Organization Kresge foundation Awarded: 2007-2010 2010: $130,000 2009: $9,958 2008: $50,000 2007: $50,000

$246,723,005

Since 2003, Over $250

Million in Grants distributed

80% for Programs in Wayne County

8% for Arts/Culture Initiatives

Funding For Arts/Cultural Programs in Detroit Woood Wo Woo Woodward oooodddwa dw war ward wa w ard aar rrdd A Avenue Ave Avvee

ARTIFACT AND CATALYST | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | MUNLY

of Ar t Institute Detroit ater a T he Oper igan itute Mich Inst n o ry Edis isto nH rica a str me nA r che r rica nte yO e C on it ph ce tro n cie De of

f Af mo seu Mu

tro

hin

Pew

Pe rf

orm

ing

rga

niz

ich

atio n cP otte onte ry mpo Detro rar y it His Ar t toric al So Inside ciety Out Lit erature Ar ts Pr oject Detroit Jazz Festival Fou ndation eum

of C

abi

CULTURAL

AR T

ter

the

it S

llia

for

ter

u Yo

ltu

ll C

Sp Mus

it S

sic

tro De

iga

R ATE THE

Detroit Repertory Theater

MUSIC

Matrix Theater Company craps Art and S ket ts Mar is t r A Detroit lub ab C Scar eum Mus l a ct ric roje isto P H y erg own iet elb oc Mot d i S l e He ca yn a ori t s n Hi nW iga tio uth h a o c v i m er Ply fM es o Pr ts Ar A VS

2010

200 9

07 20 20

2004

2003

5 200

mp ho ny He Ar t rita Ch s g L Sou oir eag eW the ue ork rn G o fM s rea ich t La Gros i k g e an sS se P ymp o inte hon Ar tis y ts A Gross ssoc e Poin iatio te His n torica l Soci ety Contem porar y A r t Institu te Jazz Developmen t Workshop

20 08

ARTIFACT AND CATALYST | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | BROWN

Step 2

Step 1

Step 3

Adaptive Infrastructure By incorporating a hybridized system along the proposed light rail route, critical infrastructure in the form of deployable prefabricated studios can be delivered along Woodward in order to densify vacant and underutilized lots with critical social infrastructure provided by artists and designers. The components include modified chassis to carry the prefabricated studios and a tri-fold gantry crane. The specialized chassis would run articulated with the standard light rail vehicles and uncouple at each site identified along Woodward. Two sets of switch tracks will allow the

Step 1: Identify Site Vacant parcels and underutilized parking lots adjacent to Woodward Avenue will be identified as potential sites.

chassis to slide perpendicular to Woodward, utilizing specialized bogies which rotate 90 degrees along the tightest allowable radius of 20m (specified by the manufacturer). Once on site, the gantry crane unfolds and engages semi-permanently to receive and send prefabricated studios. Residents will determine the configuration of the studios based on necessity and site constraints; however the height of each enclave is limited to three levels due to the wheelbase of the light rail vehicle.

Step 2: Deliver Studio Using a specialized chassis, the modules and folding gantry crane will be delivered to the site.

Step 3: Deploy Switch-tracks will allow for the bogies to maneuver the crane and module on site to be assembled.

Step 6

Step 5

Step 4

ARTICULATE

28,042 mm 92' OVER ANTI-CLIMBERS

A SECTION

C SECTION

B SECTION

S TTU UD U DIO TRUCK 3,525 mm 11' 6 3/4"

TRUCK 10,800 mm 35' 5 1/4"

Step 4: Assemble The gantry crane will remain on site to receive the modular studios and arrange them into the desired configuration.

28,650 mm 94' OVER PULLING FACE OF COUPLER

350 mm 1' 1 3/4"

DOOR ENTRANCE LEVEL 10,800 mm 35' 5 1/4"

TRI F O L D G A NT RY

TRUCK 3,525 mm 11' 6 3/4"

Step 6: Re-Deploy

Step 5: Configure Based on site restrictions and the agenda of its owner, the studios can be arranged to provide useful and efficient spaces.

As the needs of residents and local artists change, and the transit system expands operation, the modules will be re-deployed.

ARTIFACT AND CATALYST | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | BROWN

Radiant Heating

Steel Frame Milled and assembled locally in Detroit. Structurally robust and able to stack up to 3 levels.

Roof SIPs

Heating system integrated within the floor. Can also be used to cool in the summer, and provide water for plumbing.

Structurally integrated panels make for quick and sturdy components that can be prefabricated locally. The provide ample insulation

1 1

Steel Frame

Roof SIP

Heated Concrete Floor

Sliding Shutter Panel

Wall SIP

Sliding Glass Door

Wall SIPs/Concrete Floor Structurally integrated panels fit into frames, allowing for the envelope to be modified.

Sliding Shutter Panel

Sliding Glass Panels Large glass panels allow for ample sunlight and views. It also gives artists and entrepreneurs exposure to the public eye.

Allows the occupants to control sunlight and provides privacy, especially for domestic configurations.

Where does cr creativity reativityy live?

B AT H

M U LTI PUR P O S E

Domestic

GARAGE DOOR

LIV IN G

WORKSTAT IO N S

KITCHEN

B AT H

BED ROOM

The goal of the deployable prefabricated studio is to establish a new infrastructure in Detroit which can adapt to the changing needs of its residents. Accommodating domestic, commercial and creative programs, this new social ecosystem allows residents to determine a future for the motor city. Utilizing locally accessible materials and constructed using modular and prefabrication techniques favored by car manufactures the studios can be easily produced and distributed. Practically, the site of the lightrail along Woodward avenue takes advantage of denser zoning conditions, including commercial, education, health care, mixed-use and athletic venues. Symbolically, the lightrail emphasizes some of the more redemptive institutions supporting Detroit.

Art Studio

Office

ARTIFACT AND CATALYST | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | BROWN

NATIONAL QUILT MUSEUM In collaboration with: Nathan Aleskovsky

DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCE

FLOORPLANS BASEMENT 1/8” = 1’

GROUND FLOOR 1/8” = 1’

1. 2. 3.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

QUILT STORAGE / GALLERY LECTURE HALL PRESERVATION / RESTORATION

PRODUCT TRADENAME MODELNUMBER MATERIAL

TRADENAME MODELNUMBER PRODUCT MATERIAL

MODELNUMBER TRADENAME MATERIAL PRODUCT

1 1

ENTRY SEGUE MUSEUM ENTRY GIFT SHOP INFORMATION DESK LOBBY

FOURTH FLOOR 1/8” = 1’ LOBBY ENTRANCE (200SQFT) VESTIBULE INFORMATION TICKET COAT CHECK

GALLERIES (4500SQFT) TRAVELING EXHIBITS MUSEUM COLLECTION ARTIFACTS ARTWORK

RECEPTION AREA (400SQFT) CATERING

MEETING ROOMS (900SQFT) SEATING FOR 25 PEOPLE (EACH) TOILETS

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

LIBRARY (2000SQFT) 4,000 BOOKS/PERIODICLES 4 STUDY CARRELS WORK AREAS VERTICAL GALLERY / ATRIUM (TBD)

MUSEUM SHOP (400SQFT) SHELVING MATERIAL STORAGE

CIRCULATION/EXTRA

SCHOLARS’ OFFICE (900SQFT) DESKS AND SHELVES

LIBRARY MEETING ROOM SCHOLAR OFFICES ADMINSTRATION STAFF KITCHEN / WO

PRODUCT MODELNUMBER TRADENAME MATERIAL

LECTURE ROOM (1000SQFT) SEATING FOR 75 PEOPLE

t qf t

sqf 0s

qf t 0s

2nd

3rd

100s qf t

4th

100

5th

100 sqft

100sqf t

MODELNUMBER TRADENAME PRODUCT MATERIAL

1st

qf t

100

sqf

sqft

100

qf t

100s

100sqf t

5 ESTCODE

4800sqft FOOTPRINT

3 2

SECOND FLOOR 1/8” = 1’

THIRD FLOOR 1/8” = 1’

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

MAIN GALLERY

GALLERY MEETING ROOM SCHOLAR OFFICES ADMINSTRATION STAFF KITCHEN / WORKROOM

TRADENAME MODELNUMBER MATERIAL PRODUCT

MODELNUMBER TRADENAME MATERIAL PRODUCT

MATERIAL TRADENAME PRODUCT MODELNUMBER

TRADENAME MODELNUMBER PRODUCT MATERIAL

5 ESTCODE

3 2

NATIONAL QUILT MUSEUM, CAMBRIDGE, MA | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | GOODE

0% TRANSPARENCY

35% TRANSPARENCY

SERVICE SPACES

CKS

ER LOCK

G DO LOADIN

NT DOCE

/ RE ING IPP SH

TO S ILT QU

REQ UIR ED

L PP

S IE

O H

F AF ST

ILE TO

PY CO TO

S OM RO

[P GE RA

MA ER

G IVIN CE

LL CO

O RO

TIO

LIGHTING CONTROL AM T UN O

AD M

HT LIG OF

IS T

RA TIV E

RA TO

R’S

PRO GR AM

FIN AN C

FIC

IAL

AR EA

DIR EC TO R’S

EXEC UT

IVE DI

RECT

PUBLI C TOILE

OF FIC OR’

E ICE

SO FF

T ROOM

LIBRARY SCHOLARS’ OFFICES

L O U V ER DE NS ITY

OMS NG RO MEETI LECT

LLE GA

MU CE RE SERVICE

PPOR T EUM SU MUS

E AD MIN IST RA TIV

PU BL IC

OCCUP ANT

US AG E

LO BB Y

RENCY SPA AN TR

TR Y

S AS GL

LOUVERED FACADE SYSTEM PRIMARY STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBER RUBBER GASKET ALUMINUM TUBE STEEL ATTACHMENT BRACKET FRICTION HINGE HIGH TENSION STEEL CABLE STEEL BOX TUBE FRICTION HINGE

WINDOW WALL DOUBLE PANED GLASS ARGON GAS UV DIFFUSING COATING WINDOW FOOT RECEPTOR SILICONE SEALANT ALUMINUM FLASHING WINDOW HEAD RECEPTOR FINNGLASS RADIANT HEAT ELECTRODE GEN

POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 1’ SITE-CAST POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE S MULTI STRAND BONDED CABLE MORTAR ANCHORAGE WEDGE TENSION CABLE CAP

90% TRANSPARENCY

U SE

N IO PT

EA AR

URE

S RIE

O SH

M ROO

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

NATIONAL QUILT MUSEUM, CAMBRIDGE, MA | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | GOODE

TRADITIONAL QUILT BLOCKS

BI-FOLD PANEL

CUSTOM FABRICATION One requirement of this comprehensive studio project was to design a custom element with the use of various digital media. I chose to incorporate a decorative element with the main feature of the interior of the building: the vertical circulation wall. The wall itself acts as a structural element for the north portion of the building, shortening the span of each concrete slab, as well as a common element that threads its way through the entry level, gallery, library and administrative office levels. I began by looking at the inherent structural characteristics within common quilt patterns, and used a simple series of modifications to generate a repetitive pattern. Using several attraction points places along the wall, the individual folded triangulated elements repond based to their reletive proximity by increasing the intesity of their fold. This simple move generates an implicit secondary pattern where voids occur. The complexity of the patterns are then compounded by the current lighting condition (lit from above with natural light during the day, and backlight during the evening.

1’ SITE-CAST POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB WITH SLAB BAND 1’ SITE-CAST POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB WITH SLAB BAND SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM COLD FORMED STEEL C CHANNEL HEADER STEEL L CONNECTION BRACKET PERFORATED STEEL DROP COLUMN PERFORATED STEEL BOX TUBE STEEL LOWER C CHANNEL

SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM COLD FORMED STEEL C CHANNEL HEADER STEEL L CONNECTION BRACKET PERFORATED STEEL DROP COLUMN PERFORATED STEEL BOX TUBE

1’ SITE-CAST POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB WITH SLAB BAND SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM COLD FORMED STEEL C CHANNEL HEADER STEEL L CONNECTION BRACKET PERFORATED STEEL DROP COLUMN PERFORATED STEEL BOX TUBE STEEL LOWER C CHANNEL

STEEL U CHANNEL PERIMETER SUPPORT WAFER JACKPOINT SCREWS STEEL CHANNEL INTERSECTION CONNECTOR 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD ACOUSTICAL WALL/CEILING SYSTEM ALUMINUM U CHANNEL ALUMINUM Z CLIP ACOUSTIC BAFFLING (2) 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD 3-1/2” HIGH DENSITY FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION COLD ROLLED STEEL STUD 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD COLD FORMED STEEL C CHANNEL FOOTER

STEEL CHANNEL INTERSECTION CONNECTOR STEEL LOWER C CHANNEL STEEL U CHANNEL PERIMETER SUPPORT WAFER JACKPOINT SCREWS 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD

STEEL U CHANNEL PERIMETER SUPPORT WAFER JACKPOINT SCREWS STEEL CHANNEL INTERSECTION CONNECTOR 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD HANGING QUILT DISPLAY SYSTEM [TOP] ALUMINUM RAIL CONNECTOR ALUMINUM QUIT FRAME RUBBER CLAMPING SYSTEM ALUMINUM MIRROR FRAME 1/2” GLASS MIRROR

TYPICAL INTERIOR WALL 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD 3-1/2” HIGH DENSITY FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION COLD ROLLED STEEL STUD 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD COLD FORMED STEEL C CHANNEL FOOTER

TYPICAL INTERIOR WALL WHITE MATTE LOW V.O.C. LATEX PAINT 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD COLD FORMED STEEL STUD 3-1/2” HIGH DENSITY FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD WHITE MATTE LOW V.O.C. LATEX PAINT COLD FORMED STEEL C CHANNEL FOOTER

HANGING QUILT DISPLAY SYSTEM [BASE] STEEL SUPPORT BRACKET STEEL ROD THREADED CLAMP STEEL ROD SOCKET JOINT EXTRUDED STEEL PIVOT HINGE CONNECTOR EXTRUDED STEEL HINGE RECEPTOR STEEL HINGE RAIL CONCRETE ANCHOR

1’ SITE-CAST POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB WITH SLAB BAND

LECTURE HALL ACOUSTICAL WALL 1/2” = 1’

QUILT DISPLAY: GALLERY, LIBRARY 1/2” = 1’

TYPICAL INTERIOR WALL 1/2” = 1’

NATIONAL QUILT MUSEUM, CAMBRIDGE, MA | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | GOODE

1’ SITE-CAST POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB WITH SLAB BAND

CONCRETE P PANEL CEILING SYSTEM 2” RIGID FOAM INSULATION A ALUMINUM VERTICAL C BRACKET FRICTION MEMBRANE KEIL UNDERCUT ANCHOR + LOCKING SCREW ALUMINUN SUSPENSION BRACKET ADJUSTABLE T ALUMINUM SUSPENSION CLAMP 1” HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE PANEL P

SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM STEEL U CHANNEL PERIMETER SUPPORT WAFER JACKPOINT SCREWS STEEL L CONNECTION BRACKET PERFORATED A STEEL DROP COLUMN PERFORATED A STEEL BOX TUBE STEEL LOWER C CHANNEL STEEL CHANNEL INTERSECTION CONNECTOR 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD

CONCRETE PANEL P WALL SYSTEM W 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD 2” RIGID FOAM INSULATION A 2” X 2” WOOD FURRING STRIP REINFORCED CONCRETE MANSONRY KEIL UNDERCUT ANCHOR + LOCKING SCREW ALUMINUM VERTICAL C BRACKET FRICTION MEMBRANE 2“ RIGID INSULATION A WATERPROOF A MEMBRANE AIR GAP ADJUSTABLE T ALUMINUM CLAMP 1” HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE PANEL P

CONCRETE P PANEL FLOOR SYSTEM 1” HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE PANEL P ALUMINUM FLASHING WATERPROOF A MEMBRANE 2” RIGID FOAM INSULATION A ALUMINUM ADJUSTABLE T CHANNEL CLAMP ALUMINUM CHANNEL RAIL KEIL UNDERCUT ANCHOR + LOCKING SCREW CONCRETE ANCHOR ALUMINUM CHANNEL

1’ SITE-CAST POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB WITH SLAB BAND L.E.D. RIBBON LIGHTING

INTERIOR FINISHING 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD 2“ RIGID INSULATION A 2” X 2“ WOOD FURRING STRIP REINFORCED CONCRETE MANSONRY 2” X 2“ WOOD FURRING STRIP 2” RIGID INSULATION A 3/4” GYPSUM BOARD

NATIONAL QUILT MUSEUM, CAMBRIDGE, MA | STUDIO | FALL 2010 | GOODE

LIVING IN THE LOOP In collaboration with: Sandra Schwartz

We feel the concept of aging-in-place and universal design have become obfuscated in their meaning and broader applications. Accommodating the various abilities of those within a community is merely addressing the most basic human rights, however designing for aging-in-place does not limit solutions to the WHO, but it includes a very critical HOW. A paradoxical challenge presents itself in which permanence and adaptation must occur simultaneously. Restrictions imposed by aging infrastructure, and restrictive living situations make

it diffi cult for one particular built environment to remain a viable place to live, work, and foster social encounters. In order to create a livable community, we must consider how the city functions on multiple scales. The city is a shifting archipelago of events; a collection of ecosystems within a broader urban ecology. Likewise, a neighborhood functions as a microcosm of the city, in which it learns to evolve. Which begs the question, how can buildings learn to evolve?

LIVING IN THE LOOP, WASHINGTON, DC COMPETITION | FALL 2011 | ROCKCASTLE

shared community terrace

2 1

3 1

automated parking structure algae tubes

A LIVING BUILDING Closed-loop systems utilize emerging technologies to sequester and metabolize harmful waste while positively transforming the urban landscape. Looking at Washington DC we located an unlikely, however ubiquitous resource: CO2. Nearby train stations, stadiums, and parking garages all collect massive amounts of emissions from automobile exhaust, idling locomotives and buses, food preparation, etc. Utilizing a closed-loop system within the urban ecosystem, CO2 emissions can be sequestered and transported via pipelines to Bioreactor Sites located throughout the city. Bioreactors, combine plant nutrients, water, CO2, and sunlight to grow microalgae, which can be harvested and processed into a cleaner source of renewable energy. The marriage of building and

bioreactor attempts to counteract some of the biggest detriments to a buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s lifespan: mounting debt from mortgage interest and neglect. Over the lifetime of a building, an owner can pay approximately 50% of the original cost of the property in mortgage interest. We propose that in lieu of mortgage interest, the building owner harvest microalgae and yield a portion of equal value to the bank. The bank in turn will sell the algae to energy companies at market rate. The owner will then be obligated place a percentage similar to the mortgage interest into an escrow account, which would be used exclusively for building maintenance.

Convention Center Idling automobiles Parking Garage Food Preperation

A Living Building

CO2 Sequestering and metabolic reduction processes

Verizon Center

Idling automobiles Parking Garage Food Preperation

Capping the Rail Yard Union Station

850,000 SQFT

Train Yard Idling diesel locomotives Idling automobiles Parking garage

C02 Collection and Redistribution

RFK Stadium Idling automobiles Parking Lot Lawn Equipment

GREEN SPACE 7.5% 500,000

TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE 300,000

Nationals Stadium

Idling automobiles Parking Garage Lawn Equipment Food Preperation

Apartments

SUNLIGHT

co2

Automated Parking Structure NUTRIENTS

Algae Tubes

H2O

Community Activity Rooms ALGAE HARVESTING

Algae Harvest Room Community Walking Path and Elevated Plaza

Townhomes Street Level Retail

PRODUCTION OF RAW COMMODITY

INITIAL INVESTMENT OF “GREEN” TECHNOLOGY

Grocery Store and Service Below

YIELDED TO BANK IN LIEU OF MORTGAGE INTEREST

INTEREST PLACED IN ESCROW FOR FUTURE BUILDING MAINTENANCE

SOLD BY BANK AT MARKET VALUE TO ENERGY SUPPLIER

LIVING IN THE LOOP, WASHINGTON, DC COMPETITION | FALL 2011 | ROCKCASTLE

KITCHEN This kitchen consists of modular components allowing for simple installation, renovations, and removal.

Front loading side-by-side washer/dryer provide easy access to loading/unloading and keep the controls within close reach Transparent glass cabinet doors let you find items quickly Pull-out drawer storage allows for better organization and easier access to stores items and Undercounter storage on wheels transforms into a [re]-movable work station and allows for clearance space under the sink. Pull-out drawer dishwasher reduces the need to bend over when unloading/loading

6 60.00

60.00

2 9

2 60.00

1 7

FLOOR 1

FLOOR 2

ARRANGEMENT A Floors 1 & 2: 3 Bedroom, 2.5 Baths 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Living Kitchen/ Dining Laundry Bath Foyer Patio

ARRANGEMENT B Floor 1: 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath

7. Sitting 8. Master Bedroom 9. Bath 10. Study 11. Bedroom 12. Bedroom

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Living Master Bedroom Kitchen/ Dining Laundry Bath Foyer Patio

FLOOR 2

Floor 2: 2 Bedrooms, 1.5 Baths 8. Foyer 9. Living/ Dining 10. Bath 11. Kitchen 12. Laundry 13. Bedroom 14. Bedroom

BATHROOM This bathroom is nested underr the stairs, and with two doors can accomodate public/private use depending on the configuartion of the apartmentt

In-wall storage shelf utilizes space under the stairs and provides easy access to supplies

LIVING ROOM This living room is designed to simultaneously maximize user comfort and control and adapt to future alterations and lifestlye changes. Furring Strips with rubber gaskets reduce the transmission of sound and vibrations between floors. Built-in shades block sunlight completely

Acoustical wall barrier provides des privacy between adjacent apartments

Dual Control Louver system within facade allows for varoius levels of light control. The upper blinds can be operated independently, providing shade from harsh summer sunlight, and redirecting low winter light to the floor for passive heat gain

Shower seat folds into the wallll when not needed

Complete coverate of window can be achieved when a new wall is installed in an apartment, creating an ever-changing facade composition responding to the ownerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s lifestyle

Tile panel door provides inconspicuous nspicuous easy access to pipes, allowing for minimally invasive repairs

Wood floors made of fast-growing bamboo, instead of synthetic carpet reduce the amount of indoor allergens and provide a flat, uniterrupted surface

Shower floor is constructed off a porous non-slip surface on plane with the floor, tub below which lifts up to reveal a bathtub

Cork Underlayment provides a cushioned feel while reducing the transmission of sound and vibration

Basins project outward to create ate clearance space below

LIVING IN THE LOOP, WASHINGTON, DC COMPETITION | FALL 2011 | ROCKCASTLE

ROOSEVELT ISLAND RESEARCH CAMPUS

REVEAL INTERACT

LABS CONFERENCE

HOUS HO OUS USIN ING ING

SC C S SCIENCES

BUSINE BUS IINE NESS ESS INC NC N CUB UBA BA B ATOR TO ORS APPLIED ACADEMIC INSTITUTION RE RECREA REC EECREATIO REA ATIO TION ADMIN NISTR NI TRATI TRATI A ON N RESE SEEA AR RCH ADM

REC E REA REATIO TIION TIO LAB AB BS CO CONFE FEEREN REN E CE CE REC

HOUSING

AP PP PLLIEED SC SCIIEENC NCES E

RESEARCH

RECREATION

INTERACT

REVEAL

SLEDDING

SURVEYING

SKYLIGHT

HIKING

LOUNGING

READING/VIEWING

ELEVATED ENRANCE

EATING/PICNIC

BIKING

FIELD SPORTS

REES R RES RESID RESIDEN RESIDENT RESIDENTIA RESIDENTIAL ES SIDE IDE

RESIDENTIALL

RESIDENTIA RESIDENT RE RESID RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTI RESIDEN RESIDE RESI RES R EES ESIDENTIAL SIIDENTIAL S SIDENTIAL NTIALL NTIAL FFABRIC FABR ABRICA A BRICA BRIC ICA CA A

CO CO OM MM MM MEEER R RCI CIA C IIAL/ ALL// INCUBATOR C O

5 20

COMMU COM COMMU MMUN MU UNIT UN NITY NIT ITY TY Y

ATR A AT TTRI TR TRIUM RIUM RI R RIU IUM IUM UM

/ LLAB/ LAB A AB/ B B/

RESID RES RESIDEN D NTIA DEN NTIALL

COM CO COM COMMUN COMMUNITY MMUNITY NITTY

RESIDENT RES RESIDENTIAL DENTIALL

RESIDENTIAL RES RE RESID ESIDEN SIDENTIA DENTIAL NTIAL IAL

/ LAB/ A / C CLASSROOMS FABRICATION C N

LOUNGE OFFICES

ROOSEVELT ISLAND RESEARCH CAMPUS | STUDIO | SPRING 2012 | SLADE

LOWER LEVEL

ENTRANCE LEVEL

2nd LEVEL

3rd LEVEL

4th LEVEL

5th LEVEL

ROOSEVELT ISLAND RESEARCH CAMPUS | STUDIO | SPRING 2012 | SLADE

NORTH FACADE

EAST FACADE

SOUTH FACADE

WEST FACADE

FACADE SECTION DETAIL

APARTMENT UNITS “TOWNHOUSE”

THE TOWNHOUSE APARTMENT IS A 2-3 BEDROOM, ONE-AND-AHALF BATH UNIT. THE KITCHEN AND LIVING ROOM ARE ON THE ENTRANCE LEVEL, WHILE THE LIVING QUARTERS ARE ON THE LOWER LEVEL. A LOFT SPACE TOPS THE UNIT. THIS ARRANGEMENT IS IDEAL FOR FAMILIES OR MULTIPLE STUDENTS THAT REQUIRE A STUDIO WORKSPACE.

“MOTHER-IN-LAW”

THE MOTHER-IN-LAW IS A 3 BEDROOM, 2 BATH UNIT. ESSENTIALLY IT IS TWO INDIVIDUAL APARTMENT UNITS UTILIZING THE SAME HALLWAY ENTRANCE. IT FEATURES A SMALL STUDIO APARTMENT ON THE ENTRANCE LEVEL WHICH CAN BE ACCESSED PRIVATELY. IT IS IDEAL FOR EXTENDED FAMILY SITUATIONS, OR FLUCTUATING OCCUPANCY SIZES, ALLOWING EASY SUBLETTING OF SPACE.

“EFFICIENCY”

“RAMBLER”

“ENGLISH-BASEMENT”

“MARSEILLE”

“STANDARD LOFT 1”

THE RAMBLER IS A 3 BEDROOM, TWO-AND-A-HALF BATH UNIT. THE KITCHEN AND LIVNING ROM ARE LOCATED ON THE ENRANCE LEVEL WHILE THE BEDROOMS, STUDY, AND FLEX SPACE WITH KITCHENETTE ARE UPSTAIRS. THIS UNIT IS IDEAL FOR LARGE FAMILES WITH CHILDREN OR 3-4 STUDENTS IN A SUITE CONDITION.

THE ENGLISH BASEMENT IS A 3 BEDROOM, 2 BATH UNIT. THE LARGER LIVING SPACES ARE LOCATED UPSTAIRS WITH 2 BEDROOMS, A BATHROOM, A STUDY AND A LARE FLEX SPACE WHICH COULD FIT A SECOND KITCHEN. THIS UNIT CREATES AN INTERESTING CONDITION OF ADJACENCIES DEPEPNDING ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE OCCUPANTS.

THE MARSEILLE IS A 2 BEDROOM, ONE-AND-A-HALF BATH LOFT UNIT. IT IS LOCATED ON THE TOP FLOOR OF THE BUILDING WHERE THE CHANGING ROOF CONDITION CREATES SPACE FOR A TWO-LEVEL UNIT.

1650 SQ FT

1250 SQ FT

325 SQ FT

750 SQ FT

850 SQ FT

2000 SQ FT

1175 SQ FT

325 SQ FT 300 SQ FT

300 SQ FT

750 SQ FT

1375 SQ FT

1050 SQ FT

750 SQ FT

1975 SQ FT

“STANDARD LOFT 2”

THE STANDAR LOFT UNIT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH WING OF THE BUILDING. IT IS THE MOST TYPICAL UNIT WITH 1-2 BEDROOM, 1-2 BATH DEPENDING ON IF THE FLOORS ARE SHARED. SIMPLE MODIFICATION WOULD ALLOW THESE UNITS TO TRANSITION FROM EFFICIENCY UNITS TO A SUITE. THEY ARE ACCESSABLE FROM THE TOP AND BOTTOM FLOOR, DEPENDING ON THE SKIP STOP LEVEL.

850 SQ FT

850-1900 SQ FT

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

3/32” = 1’

ROOSEVELT ISLAND RESEARCH CAMPUS | STUDIO | SPRING 2012 | SLADE