Edmonton (Alta.) - 1977 - Northeast rapid transit corridor study_community demographic profiles by Edmonton Tower Resource Centre Online Library

SD LIBRARY

2996

1074/8967/1977

COMMUNITY EDMONTON.-PLANNING

COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILES e lgoativ t 41m i 'ztz42441

otb _

gr Zci tilootoz,

REHABILITATION AND REDEVELOPMENT BRANCH CITY OF EDMONTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT

,4403.1 a .E3 :5H4 1977e

EAST RA MO

TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY KtFC07-nrIvil

ritE

COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILES

REHABIJTAIT110N AND REDEVELOPMENT BRANCH Y OF EDMONT N PLANNIING DEPARTMENT

MARC 1977

TiC.E OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I - INTRODUCTION CHAPTER INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT PURPOSE OF REPORT SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS CHAPTER II - COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHIC DATA INTRODUCTION MCCAULEY RIVER LOT 20 RIVERVIEW RIVERVIEW INDUSTRIAL CROMDALE/BELLEVUE CROMDALE PARKDALE SANTA ROSA EASTWOOD/MOUNT LAWN NORTH EAST INDUSTRIAL BALWIN BELVEDERE KENNEDALE STEELE HEIGHTS CHAPTER III - SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

1 1 2 3 4 4 5 14 23 32 41 50 59 68 77 86 95 104 113 122 131

AC[1OWLEDGEMENT

The Planning Department is indebted to the Alberta Bureau of Statistics and the University of Alberta Population Laboratory for their assistance in selecting and organizing the data presented in this report.

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT In 1978, the Edmonton Rapid Transit System will be starting operation in the Northeast Corridor of the City. Given the experiences of cities with rapid transit such as Toronto, Montreal and San Francisco, it can be anticipated that the construction of the rapid transit facilities, as well as its day-to-day operation, will have significant consequences for communities that are within the vicinity of the rapid transit line and stations. What might these consequences be? How might these be dealt with to ensure that future development and growth in these communities will be compatible and consistent with the policies of City Council, as well as the desires of those living and working in the areas potentially affected? It was in response to these concerns that City Council directed the City of Edmonton Planning Department to conduct a environmental impact study. The terms of reference of this study - the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor Study - include: - The formulation of recommendations to deal with both possible positive and negative impacts of rapid transit; - The preparation of land use plans for the immediate areas surrounding the transit stations; 1

- The development of guidelines for monitoring various impacts over time; and - Design of a predictive land use model which might be applied to future rapid transit line extensions within the City.

The present report, therefore constitutes a major preliminary stage in the design and conduct of the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor Study.

PURPOSE OF REPORT The primary purpose of this report is to identify and define the major demographic characteristics of individual communities included in the Northeast Rapid Transit 1 The communities identified at this stage of the study as being most Corridor Study. likely to be affected by the operation of the rapid transit system and the construction of the associated facilities are: McCauley, River Lot 20, Riverview, Riverview Industrial, Cromdale/Bellevue, Cromdale, Parkdale, Santa Rosa, Eastwood, Northeast Industrial, Baldwin, Belvedere, Riverdale and Steele Heights. It is anticipated that other areas or communities, not included here, will experience some impact. These will be identified as the study progresses.

In this report, the term "community" should be used advisedly. The established boundaries for each do not necessarily conform to that used by other agencies, or for that matter, what residents may preceive to be their own community boundaries. These boundaries have been chosen based on a combination of factors: subdivision areas, Census Canada enumeration area boundaries, and the community league boundaries. 2

SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS As indicated earlier, the information provided in this report is delimited to a description and preliminary analysis of the socio-economic conditions of each of the fourteen communities included in the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor Study. In any preliminary report of this nature, there will be limitations particularly as they relate to the availability and use of current data. This report is no exception. The data used are 1971 Federal Census data, and as such will pose serious limitations on the conclusions that can be made of the existing socio-economic conditions in individual communities. This information, however, is vital to the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor Study, in that it establishes a bench mark which will serve as the basis for comparison between conditions in the early 1970's and the changes that will take place as a result of rapid transit. The identification and evaluation of present socio-economic factors will be conducted on the basis of current information which will be gathered during the progress of the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor Study.

C1-:iTTER II COMMUNITY DEMOC:IAKTIC DATA

INTRODUCTION The following sections present an overall demographic profile for each community in the Northeast Corridor. Tables and figures are included with each profile. However, one small portion of the Northeast Corridor not included in these profiles is the area of the May Park-Bergman replot area which is located northeast of Santa Rosa and east of North East Industrial. This area is currently being replotted for subdivision development by the City Planning Department. It has a very small population, with less than 10 houses in May Park and less than 6 houses in Bergman. Therefore, adequate demographic profiles could not be drawn for this area, but its future population will need to be considered during planning for the Northeast Corridor.

Note:

All figures in this report have been subjected to a confidentiality procedure to prevent the possibility of associating small figures with any identifiable individual. The particular technique used is known as "random rounding". Under this method, all last or "unit" digits in a table (including all totals) are randomly rounded (either up or down) to "0" or "5". This technique provides the strongest possible protection against direct, residual or negative disclosures without adding any significant error to the census data. However, since totals are independently rounded, they do not necessarily equal the sum of individually rounded figures in distribution. Also, minor differences can be expected for corresponding totals and all values in various census tabulations. 4

McCAULEY POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The McCauley population (5,710) displays a predominance of males, being 12% more than females. For both sexes there are fewer persons in the age groups under 20 as compared to the City average (24% compared to 40% for males, and 30% compared to 39% for females). There are, however, many more in the over 50 age group than the City average for both sexes (24% compared to 17% for males, and 31% compared to 18% for females). The marital status figures are similar to the City average with just slightly more divorced and widowed persons (3% and 8% compared to 2% and 4% respectively).

The ethnic composition for both males and females shows a lower percent with a mother tongue of English than the City average (37% and 38% compared to City average of 78%) and many more with mother tongues of Italian, Ukrainian or other.

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING McCauley displays a predominance of non-family households (more than double the City average of 21%). Housing is composed primarily of apartments (66% as compared to the 5

City average of 33%). Three-quarters of all the dwellings are rented.

EDUCATJON AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS A very high proportion of both males and females have less than grade 10 education (70% and 67%). Very few are high school graduates or have post high school education of any type. A low proportion of males are in technical or professional occupations (6% compared to 17% City average). There are more males employed in trades than THE City average (42% compared to 33%). More males were also employed in "other" occupations. There is also a lower proportion of females in technical or professional occupations (11% compared to 21% City average). A much higher proportion are employed in trades (13% compared to 5%) and more with their occupation listed as "other". At the time of the 1971 census there were twice as many males unemployed as the City average (16% compared to 7%) and also a higher proportion of females unemployed (10% compared to City's 8%). The average household income of $4,978 is much lower than the $10,153 City average.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

3190

55.9

49.9

Female

2520

44.1

50.1

TOTAL Population

5710

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 2:

Marital Status Number

Single

2570

48.0

48.8

Married

2350

41.0

45.7

Divorced

190

3.3

1.8

Widowed

435

7.6

3.7

5725

100%

TOTAL

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

1085

37.3

78.3

French

145

5.0

3.2

German

105

3.6

5.5

1.2

395

13.6

1.7

Dutch

1.4

Polish

120

4.1

1.3

Ukrainian

510

17.5

6.9

Other

500

17.2

1.4

TOTAL

2910

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Indian & Eskimo Italian

Table 4:

Mother Tongue (Females) Number

English

845

38.2

78.5

French

160

7.2

3.4

German

3.4

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

1.8

325

14.7

1.5

Dutch

1.3

Polish

3.4

1.2

375

17.0

7.0

Other

300

13.6

1.2

TOTAL

2210

100%

Italian

Ukrainian

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

1050

40.3

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.9

1.3

Non-Family Households

1505

57.8

21.1

TOTAL Number of Households

2605

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single Detached

810

32.4

' 60.1

Single Attached

1.6

6.1

1650

66.0

33.4

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Apartments Mobile Homes

TOTAL Dwellings

100%

Number

Community .Percentage

City Percentage

Owned

630

25.0

52.9

Rented

1885

75.0

47.1

TOTAL Dwellings

2515

100%

Table 3:

2500

Dwelling by Tenure

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

Level of Schooling* (Males)

Table 1:

Number

Community Percentage

1435

69.8

Some High School

305

14.8

High School Graduate

165

8.0

2.4

100

4.9

2055

100%

Under Grade 10

Post High School Training Some University TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

985

67.0

Some High School

200

13.6

High School Graduate

135

9.2

Post High School Training

5.8

Some University

4.4

1470

100%

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 11

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

110

6.3

17.1

Clerical, Sales

455

26.1

38.0

Trades

730

41.8

32.9

Otht, Not Stated

450

25.8

12.0

1745

100%

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

105

11.2

20.7

Clerical, Sales

525

56.2

64.1

Trades

120

12.8

4.7

Other, Not Stated

185

19.8

10.5

TOTAL

935

100%

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

City Percentage

1195

83.6

92.6

235

16.4

7.4

1430

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

605

89.6

91.9

10.4

8.1

675

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Community Percentage

Household Income

Total Number 2305

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$4,978

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

RIVER LOT 20 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The River Lot 20 community (population 4,100) has the highest proportion of males (70%) as compared to females of the communities in the Northeast Corridor. There are fewer persons in the under 20 age group (12% compared to City's 40% for males and 27% compared to City's 39% for females). There is a higher proportion in the over 50 age group (46% compared to City's 17% for males and 34% compared to City's 18% for females). This emphasis on older age groups is especially true for the over 70 age group.

Marital status figures show more single, divorced and widowed persons (52%, 5%, 10% compared to City's 49%, 2% and 4% respectively). The ethnic composition of males shows fewer individuals with an English mother tongue (51% compared to City's 78%) and more Ukrainian and other mother tongues (14% and 20% compared to City's 7% and 1% respectively). There are also fewer females with an English mother tongue (49% compared to 79%) and more with Indian and Eskimo (5% compared to 0.4%), Ukrainian (12% to 7%) and "other" (23% compared to City's 1%).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING River Lot 20 has a very high proportion of non-family households (76% compared to City's 21%) and a low proportion of single family households. There are few single detached or attached dwellings. The large majority of dwellings are apartments (81% compared to City's average of 33%). An extremely high proportion of all dwellings are rented (89%).

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS A very high proportion of both males and females have less than Grade 10 education (65% and 64% respectively). Very few are high school graduates or have any post high school training. There are fewer males in technical and professional occupations than the City average (7% compared to City's 17%) and more with occupations either "other" or "not stated". There is also a smaller proportion of females in technical and professional occupations (11% compared to 21%), and many more in trades (16% compared to City average of 5%). At the time of the 1971 census there were four times as many males unemployed as the City average (31% compared to 7%), and also a higher proportion of females unemployed (12% compared to City average of 8%). The average household income of $4,446 is much lower than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

2850

69.5

49.9

Female

1250

30.5

50.1

TOTAL Population

4100

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table

Marital Status Number

Single

2175

52.3

48.8

Married

1340

32.3

45.7

Divorced

225

5.4

1.8

Widowed

415

10.0

3.7

4155

100%

TOTAL

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

1460

50.8

78.3

French

115

4.0

3.2

German

135

4.7

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

2.0

Italian

1.4

1.7

Dutch

1.4

Polish

100

3.5

1.3

Ukrainian

395

13.7

6.9

Other

560

19.5

1.4

TOTAL

2875

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 4:

Mother Tongue (Females) Number

English

625

48.6

78.5

French

3.5

3.4

German

2.7

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

5.1

Italian

2.0

1.5

Dutch

1.3

Polish

1.9

1.2

Ukrainian

155

12.1

7.0

Other

300

23.3

1.2

TOTAL

1285

100%

FIGURE 2 AC -SEX STRUCTURE FOR RIVER LOT 20

age XXX'

IMNIVANg.xv 11161111&"N NA6,WIN 1111INV`"Nv V4LNV\NN, IlaNANNsAw \NANNVall114 NVON:V611 ".104wN Immoow"ow„

MALE

70 + 65-69

FEMALE

VIOVVVtAXN.N.

LNV\Iiii.V\VNANN\ VkiNZW‘NNI MAINV4 Vi,\XV..‘1111

ammoommi N: r- .

60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9

1-4

21 20 /9 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

percentage

Xv COMMUNITY Ea CITY

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

480

23.8

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.3

Non-Family Households

1525

75.7

21.1

TOTAL Number of Households

2015

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single Detached

300

15.2

60.1

Single Attached

3.5

6.1

1610

81.3

33.4

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Apartments

Mobile Homes 100%

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

210

10.6

52.9

Rented

1780

89.4

47.1

TOTAL Dwellings

1990

100%

TOTAL Dwellings

Table 3:

Owned

1980

Dwelling by Tenure

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Level of Schooling* (Males) Number

Community Percentage

1505

65.4

Some High School

415

18.0

High School Graduate

210

9.1

2.6

110

4.8

2300

100%

Under Grade 10

Post High School Training Some University TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

580

64.4

Some High School

125

13.9

High School Graduate

110

12.2

Post High School Training

5.6

Some University

3.9

900

100%

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 20

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

110

6.8

17.1

Clerical, Sales

505

31.4

38.0

Trades

345

21.4

32.9

Other, Not Stated

650

40.4

12.0

1610

100%

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Community Percentage

City Percentage

10.6

20.7

315

55.8

64.1

15.9

4.7

Other, Not Stated

100

17.7

10.5

TOTAL

565

100%

Number Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales Trades

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1105

69.3

92.6

490

30.7

7.4

1595

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

450

88.2

91.9

11.8

8.1

510

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Household Income

Total Number 2000

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$4,446

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

RIVERVIEW POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The Riverview population (1,595) has a slightly higher proportion of females than the City average (53% compared to 50%). This area has an extremely skewed age distribution, with almost half the population in the 20-30 age group. There are also more in the 1-4 year age category for both sexes and fewer people in all other age categories.

The area has more married and fewer single persons than the City average (55% and 39% compared to City's 46% and 49%).

This area displays little ethnic mix with most individuals having an English mother tongue.

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING This community has more non-family households and fewer one-family households than the City averages (31% and 68% compared to 21% and 78% respectively). The housing is almost entirely apartments (96%) and almost all dwellings are rented (97%).

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS One-quarter of the population not attending school full time has less than grade 10 education. Nearly one-third of the male and female population has some post high school training. The distribution of people in occupation types is very similar to the City average figures with slightly fewer males in trade occupations (28% compared to 33%) and fewer women in technical and professional occupations (17% compared to 21% City average). The employed/unemployed figures for both males and females in 1971 were similar to those for the City average. The average household income of $7,719 is less than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

755

47.3

49.9

Female

840

52.7

50.1

1595

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

TOTAL Population

Table 2:

Marital Status Number

Single

605

38.7

48.8 '

Married

865

55.3

45.7

Divorced

3.2

1.8

Widowed

2.7

3.7

1565

100%

TOTAL

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

535

73.8

78.3

French

1.4

3.2

German

2.8

5.5

English

Indian & Eskimo

1.7

Italian 15

Dutch

2.1

1.4 1.3

Polish 45

6.2

6.9

Other

100

13.8

1.4

TOTAL

725

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

610

74.4

78.5

French

2.4

3.4

German

2.4

5.5

Ukrainian

Table 4:

Indian & Eskimo

Mother Tongue (Females)

1.5

Italian Dutch

1.2

1.3 1.2

Polish Ukrainian

7.3

7.0

Other

11.6

1.2

TOTAL

820

100%

FIGURE 3 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR RIVERVIEW

age

V01111,111 aMliki XVOMEM

V401M19111 • VONM M

70+ 65-69

FEMALE

60-64 55-59 50-54

. ."10. 11:%,VM

...."." 1111 r mmumr--mxNNN 4,XXX

NW\M NVOM NVONV

wiNov,..xw% N

N:%:44.N:VviNg XWVVVIN\\NW

F ,wwxv"xvklx 114

NkNNNkX‘VW%Mil %.NAAOMMM \NNVMMOMMIMMMO iNVW0,XV,Wligg

r -

45-49

221201918171615141312 11 109 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

40-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-21 15-19 10-14 5-9 1-4

123456789101112131415161718192021435

percentage COMMUNITY [

CIIY

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

465

67.9

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.3

Non-Family Households

215

31.4

21.1

TOTAL Number of Households

685

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

3.7

60.1

Dwelling By Type

Table 2:

Single Detached

6.1

Single Attached 655

Apartments

96.3

Mobile Homes TOTAL Dwellings

Table 3:

33.4

680

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Dwelling by Tenure

2.9

52.9

Rented

660

97.1

47.1

TOTAL Dwellings

680

100%

Owned

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Level of Schooling* (Males)

Table 1:

Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

175

25.9

Some High School

110

16.3

High School Graduate

175

25.9

Post High School Training

110

16.3

Some University

105

15.6

TOTAL

675

100%

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

210

27.3

Some High School

145

18.8

High School Graduate

215

27.9

Post High School Training

105

13.6

12.3

770

100%

Some University TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 29

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

105

18.1

17.1

Clerical, Sales

195

33.6

38.0

Trades

165

28.4

32.9

Other, Not Stated

115

19.8

12.0

TOTAL

580

100%

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Community Percentage

City Percentage

17.0

20.7

340

68.0

64.1

Trades

4.0

4.7

Other, Not Stated

11.0

10.5

500

100%

Number Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales

TOTAL

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Community Percentage

City Percentage

515

92.0

92.6

8.0

7.4

560

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

440

91.7

91.9

8.3

8.1

480

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Household Income

Total Number 705

Average Community Household Income

Averge City Household Income

$7,719

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

11E11

TI'

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The Riverview Industrial population (1,945) has male/female proportions and marital status figures similar to City averages. There are more people in the youngest age group (1-4 years) for both sexes, (13% each compared to 9% each for males and females). There are also more in the 20-30 age group, especially males (28% compared to 19% for males, 26% compared to 19% for females). The ethnic composition for males shows fewer with an English mother tongue (53% compared to 78% City average) and more Ukrainian and "other" mother tongues (9% and 19% compared to 7% and 1%) than the City average. Females also show fewer with an English mother tongue (59% to 78%) and more Ukrainian, Indian and Eskimo, and "other" (9%, 5%, 17% compared to City's 7%, .4%, 1% respectively).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Riverview Industrial has a household type composition similar to the City average with just slightly more non-family households (28% compared to 21%). The housing is primarily apartments (69% compared to 33% City average) with a very high proportion of the dwelling units rented (83% compared to 47% City average). 32

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Half of the males and females not attending school full-time have less than grade 10 education. Approximately one-third of the males and females are either high school graduates or have some high school education. A small proportion for both sexes has post high school training. A lower proportion of males than the City average has technical and professional occupations (11% compared to 17%). There are higher proportions in trade occupations and "other" or "not stated" (36% and 20% compared to 33% and 12% City averages). There are fewer females in technical and professional occupations than the City average (7% compared to 21%) and many more in trades (17% compared to 5%).

At the time of the 1971 census, there was more than twice the average proportion of males unemployed (16% compared to 7%) and the same proportion of females unemployed as the City average. The average household income of $8,048 is less than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

980

50.4

49.9

Female

965

49.6

50.1

1945

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single

970

51.2

48.8

Married

810

42.7

45.7

Divorced

2.6

1.8

Widowed

3.4

3.7

1895

100%

TOTAL Population

Table 2:

TOTAL

Marital Status

Table 3:

Mother Tongue (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

510

53.4

78.3

French

2.6

3.2

German

3.7

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

2.1

Italian

7.9

1.7

Dutch

1.4

Polish

1.6

1.3

Ukrainian

8,9

6.9

Other

185

19.4

1.4

TOTAL

955

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

545

59.2

78.5

French

3.3

3.4

German

2.2

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

2.2

Italian

5.4

1.5

Table 4:

English

Mother Tongue (Females)

1.3

Dutch 15

1.6

1.2

9,2

7.0

Other

155

16.8

1.2

TOTAL

920

100%

Polish Ukrainian

FIGURE 4 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR RIVERVIEW INDUSTRIAL

age

Immummommommr'v V"ill'IMMOMMOMMOMOMME mmmmmmmmmmummmmrv V°1111MOMMIMMOOMIOMMOM NM MALE MOIMMINEW" VN'NEMOMMIIIIIII FEMALE II ommommommorsow MOMMOMMOMMOOMMOOM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmrmftvo °'"11111110111101111MMOMOM immommummorm"-%-1 '"'"IIIMMOMMOMMOMMOMM Immummummim"voN '911111101011111001111 immummommemNiv"v"%.71/4NNA:mmommummummom 101MOMIMOMMOBW"' "Nvolwommommom OMIROMMMANIINr .'""„. lommumm „„ ...7vvviamigamon 111100161ANWV"N"'`"'N" OMMOMMOOIMMr""'" NvoNv""mmommommom 1-mmummomm IMIOMMOMMOr''' N2-1'" "Alimmommomm IMIMOOMMINF"`"'""' MOOMMOONNinv""'" .NvoNv"lasommommon 7 89 10 11 12131415161718192021 21201918171451514131211109876543

70 + 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 1-4

21 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

percentage

xN COMMUNITY CITY

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

430

70.0

77.6

Two-Family Households

2.4

1.3

Non-Family Households

170

27.6

21.1

TOTAL Number of Households

615

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single Detached

175

29.7

60.1

Single Attached

6.1

410

69.5

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Apartments

33.4 .4

Mobile Homes 590

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Owned

100

16.7

52.9

Rented

500

83.3

47.1

TOTAL Dwellings

600

100%

TOTAL Dwellings

Table 3:

Dwelling by Tenure

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

Level of Schooling* (Males)

Table 1:

Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

380

50.0

Some High School

165

21.7

High School Graduate

10.5

Post High School Training

7.9

Some University

9.9

760

100%

TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

385

50.0

Some High School

200

26.0

High School Graduate

9.7

Post High School Training

9.7

Some University

4.5

770

100%

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 38

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Community Percentage

City Percentage

11.1

17.1

Clerical, Sales

160

32.3

38.0

Trades

180

36.4

32.9

Other, Not Stated

100

20.2

12.0

TOTAL

495

100%

Number Technical, Professional

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Community Percentage

City Percentage

6.8

20.7

170

57.6

64.1

Trades

16.9

4.7

Other, Not Stated

18.6

10.5

295

100%

Number Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales

TOTAL

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

445

84.0

92.6

16.0

7.4

530

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

290

92.1

91.9

7.9

8.1

315

100%

Total Number

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$8,048

$10,153

Employment* (Females) Number

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Household Income

600

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

/ BELLEVUE POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The population of this community (1,450) displays a slightly higher proportion of females than the City average (52% compared to 50%). There is a much higher proportion of people in the over 50 age groups (males 29% compared to 17%; females 40% compared to 18%). This is particularly true for the over 70 age group which has twice the average proportion. There are, of course, fewer persons therefore, in the younger age groups than the City average.

There are fewer single persons (38% compared to City's 49%) and more married and widowed persons (53% and 7% compared to City's 46% and 4% respectively).

Both males and females have smaller proportions with an English mother tongue than average (males 72% compared to 78%; females 76% compared to 79%) and approximately twice the average proportion with Ukrainian mother tongue (13% compared to City's 7% for both sexes).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING The household composition in this community is similar to the City average. There are more single detached dwellings than average (76% compared to City's 60%) and fewer apartments (18% compared to 33%). There is more owner occupancy than the City average with 61% owned compared to the City average of 53%.

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Less than half the population not attending school full time has less than grade 10 education (40% for males, 44% for females). This areas shares with Steele Heights, the highest proportion of people with post high school or university training. (19% for males, 16% for females). There are more males in technical, professional occupations than average (22% compared to City's 17%) and fewer in trades (27% compared to 33%). Half the average proportion of females are involved in technical, professional occupations (10% compared to 21%) with more in clerical, sales occupations (77% compared to 64%). At the time of the 1971 census, the male proportion of the labour force unemployed was similar to the City average, while the female proportion was slightly higher than average (11% compared to 8%). The average household income of $7,984 is lower than the City average of $10,153. 42

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

695

47.9

49.9

Female

755

52.1

50.1

1450

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single

540

38.0

48.8

Married

745

52.5

45.7

2.1

1.8

105

7.4

3.7

1420

100%

TOTAL Population

Table 2:

Divorced Widowed TOTAL

Marital Status

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Community Percentage

City Percentage

480

72.2

78.3

French

3.0

3.2

German

4.5

5.5

Number English

Indian & Eskimo

1.7

Dutch

1.5

1.4

Polish

1.3

Ukrainian

12.8

6.9

Other

4.5

1.4

TOTAL

665

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

540

76.1

78.5

French

1.4

3.4

German

4.9

5.5

Italian

Table 4:

Mother Tongue (Females)

Indian & Eskimo .7

Italian

1.5 1.3

Dutch 5

1.2

Ukrainian

12.7

7.0

Other

3.5

1.2

TOTAL

710

100%

Polish

FIGURE 5 AfiE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR CROMDALE/ BELLEVUE

age k MALE

N,N

•

v'INAM11111111 ligivo‘NA,.•:1 4-"`111V611111111111 Vk IKSINAAN":4 x`-'11111111111111 A,..101kN'V

70 + 65-69

FEMALE

60-64 55-59 50-54 45- 49

illrb\VO 6NV10011111119

40-44

MENNINN,71.7% 011\ \lb\ Mill

35-39

ON:ViN11111111 th.NN:41.1kAA:%,,Ni.

25-29

Vt.NN VONA.

20-24

AANX%V•AN .7% VON; VIO ZW/01.

%NA V4L VONV VA VONVON:\ -14 6\

21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

30-35

15-19 10 -1I 5-9 1-4

2 3 4 5 6 7 89 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

percentage xv COMMUNITY NM CITY

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type

One-Family Households

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

370

73.3

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.3

Non-Family Households

135

26.7

21.1

TOTAL Number of Households

505

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single Detached

390

75.7

60.1

Single Attached

6.8

6.1

Apartments

17.5

33.4

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Mobile Homes

TOTAL Dwellings

515

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Owned

315

61.2

52.9

Rented

200

38.8

47.1

TOTAL Dwellings

515

100%

Table 3:

Dwelling by Tenure

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Level of Schooling* (Males) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

190

39.6

Some High School

120

25.0

High School Graduate

16.7

Post High School Training

7.3

Some University

11.4

480

100%

TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

250

44.2

Some High School

150

26.5

High School Graduate

13.3

Post High School Training

9.7

Some University

6.2

565

100%

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 47

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Community Percentage

City Percentage

21.9

17.1

120

37.5

38.0

Trades

26.6

32.9

Other, Not Stated

14.0

12.0

320

100%

Number Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Community Percentage

City Percentage

10.3

20.7

150

76.9

64.1

Number Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales Trades Other, Not Stated TOTAL

4.7 25

12.8

10.5

195

100%

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

495

92.5

92.6

7.5

7.4

535

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

250

89.3

91.9

10.7

8.1

280

100%

Employment* (Females) Number

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Household Income

Total Number 520

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$7,984

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

CROMDALE POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The Cromdale population (1,895) is similar to City averages in terms of male/ female proportions, marital status and age/sex composition (with just slightly more people in the over 50 age groups than the City average).

The ethnic composition of males shows fewer with an English mother tongue (69% compared to City's 78%) and more with Ukrainian and "other" mother tongues (10% and 8% compared to City's 7% and 1% respectively). There is also a smaller proportion of females with an English mother tongue (74% compared to City's 79%) and more with Ukrainian and "other" (11% and 6% compared to City's 7% and 1%).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING The household composition in this community is similar to City averages. There are more single detached dwellings than average (83% compared to 60%) and fewer apartments (17% compared to City's 33%). Tenure of the dwellings is very similar to City averages.

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Nearly half the population not attending school full-time in Cromdale has less than grade 10 education. An extremely small proportion of this population has a post high school training of any kind (6% for males and females). A lower proportion of males than average are employed in technical and professional occupations (9% compared to 17%), with more than average employed in trades (49% compared to City's 33%). Similarly fewer females are employed in technical and professional occupations (9% compared to City's 21%), but more females are employed in clerical and sales occupations (79% compared to City's 64%). At the time of the 1971 census, unemployment figures for the area were similar to the City averages for males, but more females than average were unemployed (11% compared to 8%). The average household income of $8,471 is less than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

940

49.6

49.9

Female

955

50.4

50.1

1895

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single

925

48.2

48.8

Married

855

44.5

45.7

Divorced

1.8

Widowed

105

5.5

3.7

1920

100%

TOTAL Population

Table 2:

TOTAL

Marital Status

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

640

68.8

78.3

French

2.7

3.2

German

5.9

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

1.1

Italian

1.6

1.7

Dutch

1.1

1.4

Polish

1.1

1.3

Ukrainian

10.2

6.9

Other

7.5

1.4

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

690

73.8

78.5

French

1.1

3.4

German

5.3

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

1.1

Italian

1.1

1.5

Dutch

1.3

Polish

1.2

100

10.7

7.0

Other

5.9

1.2

TOTAL

935

100%

930

TOTAL

Table 4:

Ukrainian

Mother Tongue (Females)

FIGURE 6 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR CROMDALE age

IMMOMMEMOOMOMMOMP"v" """IMMOMMOMOMMOMMON IMMOMOIONOMMOOMMI "VallOOOMIOMMOOMMOMMO MALE OM MOOMMOOMM611' v"SaMMEMOMMOM FEMALE MO MOMMENOMOMMOMMOMbr"" v'rillaIMMOOOMMOMMOMMO IMIMMOMMOOMMOMIW'v" EMOONNOMMOOMMOM mommsmommorw"-• .'"="'IMINIMMOOMMOOMMOO MONOOMMOOMOMMIWv 91111111111MONOMMON mummummom1':"7"" MMOOMMOOMEMOMOM mommomporom"xv v"v°14111.100MMOOMOMOI mommummr""x" voxv1.....mmilmummomomm 11111MOMMOMMMOm

mommummeinv"0"w%' mommommurn"•-"=°'° NvoNvc%xvoilimmommo ImImmiasivv`".":"-xvy1/41 "MOMMOOMMOM mummol Oirg"N`vv° v°411111100111111110 onommoseNvoA-"'N "1110 MOOMMON

21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 21 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 UMW2021

percentage ws COMMUNITY NM CITY

70 + 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45- 49 40-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-34 15-19 10-14 5-9 1-4

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

450

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.7

1.3

Non-Family Households

120

20.7

21.1

TOTAL Number of Households

580

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

82.6

60.1

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Single Detached

475

6.1

Single Attached Apartments

100

17.4

Mobile Homes TOTAL Dwellings

Table 3:

33.4

575

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Dwelling by Tenure

Owned

320

54.7

52.9

Rented

265

45.3

47.1

TOTAL Dwellings

585

100%

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Level of Schooling* (Males)

Table 1:

Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

320

45.7

Some High School

130

18.6

High School Graduate

210

30.0

Post High School Training

3.6

Some University

2.1

700

100%

TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

295

52.2

Some High School

135

23.9

High School Graduate

100

17.7

Post High School Training

4.4

Some University

1.8

565

100%

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 56

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Community Percentage

City Percentage

9.1

17.1

Clerical, Sales

125

28.4

38.0

Trades

215

48.9

32.9

13.6

12.0

440

100%

Number Technical, Professional

Other, Not Stated TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Community Percentage

City Percentage

9.3

20.7

170

79.1

64.1

2.3

4.7

9.3

10.5

215

100%

Number Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales Trades Other, Not Stated TOTAL

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

495

92.5

92.6

7.5

7.4

535

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

250

89.3

91.9

10.7

8.1

280

100%

Employment* (Females) Number

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Household Income

Total Number 580

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$8,471

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

PARKDALE POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The population of Parkdale (5,195) is similar to City averages in terms of male/female proportions, marital status and age/sex composition (with slightly fewer in ages under 50 and slightly more in ages over 50).

The ethnic composition of males shows fewer with an English mother tongue (57% compared to City's 78%) and more with Italian, Ukrainian and "other" mother tongues (12%, 10% and 12% compared to City proportions of 2%, 7% and 1%). The proportion of females with an English mother tongue is also smaller than the City average (57% compared to City's 79%) with greater proportions having Italian, Ukrainian and other mother tongues (11%, 11% and 11% compared to City's 2%, 7% and 1% respectively).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING The household composition in Parkdale is similar to City averages. There are more single detached dwellings than average (79% compared to City's 60%) and fewer apartments (19% compared to 33%). There are more owner occupied dwellings than the City average (61% compared to 53%). 59

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS High proportions of males and females in this community have less than grade 10 education (64% for males, 61% for females). Of the remainder, few have post high school or university education (8% for males and females). There are few males employed in technical and professional occupations (4% compared to City's 17%) and more in trades than average (47% compared to City's 33%). Females similarly, have a small proportion in technical and professional occupations (9% compared to 21%) and more in trades (17% compared to City's 5%). At the time of the 1971 census there were more males unemployed than the average (13% compared to 7%) and slightly more females unemployed (10% compared to 8%).

The average household income of $7,368 in Parkdale is less than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

2590

49.9

Female

2605

50.1

TOTAL Population

5195

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 2:

Marital Status Number

Single

2415

46.6

48.8

Married

2315

44.7

45.7

Divorced

105

2.0

1.8

Widowed

350

6.8

3.7

5185

100%

TOTAL

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1480

56.8

78.3

French

2.3

3.2

German

3.5

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

300

11.5

1.7

Dutch

1.4

Polish

2.9

1.3

Ukrainian

255

9.8

6.9

Other

315

12.1

1.4

TOTAL

2605

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1480

56.8

78.5

French

2.1

3.4

German

105

4.0

5.5

1.0

285

10.9

1.5

Dutch

1.3

Polish

2.1

1.2

Ukrainian

290

11.1

7.0

Other

290

11.1

1.2

2605

100%

English

Italian

Table 4:

Mother Tongue (Females) Number

English

Indian & Eskimo Italian

TOTAL

FIGURE 7 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR PARKDALE

age

111111111111111111111111111111111111illi'v "'"Nklii11111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111161'llllllllllllllll MALE

`Nwig1111.1111111111111 FEMALE MN

70 + 65-69 60-64 55-59

111111111.111111111111111111rNv‘Nv

1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111

11111111111111111111111111111111111' ''1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111w ''''1111111111111111111111111111111111111111

ummummasora":":"A "Av"Alimmenimmommum nummmommmorP'°'-i ‘NN'°6111pommomimmum moommommir- V.N.• k.'1% bocx7-:" milmommemEmmm 4.'NN A. 1/41 taIllllllIll 111111111111111111rW°"‘" 4:VW6NV"'"1111111111111111111111111111111 ‘1.'% V' 0\ V : 11111111111111111 1 'V 11111111111111W 00 N.N.N.NNVIA :VOA VOLNi.\ 1

milimmonir

NMI 11111111110116

" A' bxv'x'''11111111111111111111111111111111

21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

percentage

w COMMUNITY CITY

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15 -19 10-14 5-9 1-4

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

1210

73.8

77.6

Two-Family Households

2.1

1.3

Non-Family Households

395

24.1

21.1

1640

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

TOTAL Number of Households

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type Number

Single Detached

1305

78.9

60.1

Single Attached

2.4

6.1

310

18.7

33.4

Apartments

Mobile Homes

Table 3:

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1000

61.0

52.9

640

39.0

47.1

1640

100%

1655

TOTAL Dwellings

Dwelling by Tenure Number

Owned Rented TOTAL Dwellings

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Level of Schooling* (Males)

Table 1:

Number

Community Percentage

1105

63.9

Some High School

320

18.5

High School Graduate

160

9.2

Post High School Training

4.0

Some University

4.3

1730

100%

Under Grade 10

TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

1160

60.9

Some High School

365

19.2

High School Graduate

220

11.5

Post High School Training

4.5

Some University

3.9

1905

100%

Under Grade 10

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 65

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

4.0

17.1

Clerical, Sales

395

31.5

38.0

Trades

585

46.6

32.9

Other, Not Stated

225

17.9

12.0

1255

100%

Technical, Professional

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

9.0

20.7

Clerical, Sales

450

62.5

64.1

Trades

120

16.7

4.7

11.8

10.5

720

100%

Technical, Professional

Other, Not Stated TOTAL

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

City Percentage

1140

87.0

92.6

170

13.0

7.4

1310

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

700

90.3

91.9

9.7

8.1

775

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Community Percentage

Household Income

Total Number 1640

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$7,368

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

SANTA ROSA POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The population of Santa Rosa (1,665) has a slightly higher proportion of males than the City average (52% compared to 50%). There are slightly more of both sexes in the 20-24 age group and more in the over 50 age group (24% compared to City's 17% for males, 28% compared to City's 18% for females). Marital status figures show fewer people married than average (37% compared to City's 46%) and more single or widowed (54% and 7% compared to City averages 49% and 4%). The ethnic composition for males shows fewer with an English mother tongue (64% compared to City's 78% average) and more with a Ukrainian mother tongue (18% compared to City's 7% average). There is also a smaller proportion of females with an English mother tongue (66% compared to City's 79%) and a larger proportion with Ukrainian mother tongue (17% compared to City's 7% average).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING There are fewer one-family households in this area than the City average (79% compared to 78%) and more two- and non-family households. There are also more single detached

(70% compared to City's 60%) and fewer apartments (27% compared to 33%) than the City averages. The tenure figures are similar to the City averages.

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS A high proportion of the residents of Santa Rosa have less than grade ten education (59% males, 57% females). Compared to the rest of the Corridor, there are fairly high proportions of both sexes with post high school or university training (males 15%, females 15%). There are fewer males in technical, professional, clerical and sales occupations than average (11% and 27% compared to 17% and 38% respectively). More males are employed in trade occupations than average (41% compared to City's 33%). There are half as many females as average employed in technical and professional occupations (10% compared to City's 21%) and more in trades "other", and "not stated" (8%, 21% compared to City's 5% and 11% respectively).

At the time of the 1971 census, there were more males (12% compared to 7%) and more females (16% compared to 8%) unemployed in this area than the City average.

The average household income of $7,307 is less than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

865

52.0

49.9

Female

800

48.0

50.1

1665

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single

770

53.5

48.8

Married

530

36.8

45.7

2.8

1.8

100

6.9

3.7

1440

100%

TOTAL Population

Table 2:

Divorced Widowed TOTAL

Marital Status

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Community Percentage

City Percentage

570

64.4

78.3

French

3.4

3.2

German

3.4

5.5

Number English

Indian & Eskimo

.3 5

1.7

Dutch

1.1

1.4

Polish

1.7

1.3

160

18.1

6.9

Other

7.3

1.4

TOTAL

885

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

540

65.9

78.5

French

3.7

3.4

German

3.7

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

1.8

Italian

1.5

Dutch

1.3

Polish

1.8

1.2

140

17.1

7.0

Other

4.9

1.2

TOTAL

820

100%

Italian

Ukrainian

Table 4:

Ukrainian

Mother Tongue (Females)

FIGURE 8 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR SANTA ROSA

age

MOMMOMMOMOMMOMAF"'" "'"vilMOMOMOMMOMMOMOO IMOIMMOOMOMMONINgav° °"IiggIONOIOMMOMOMOMOI Im MALE MOOMMOOMMON"v" NIOMMOOMME FEMALE OM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmsrx"-N :‘v alWIMMOOMMEMONMOMIN MMOOMMOMMOMMOMMI

mommumminukvINvo mommummourLA "1111110111011MOOMMOO mmmmmmmmmmr-o'°x ""9110111101111011101011 moommummr""Nv """'OMMOMOMMOOMMOOM

111111111111r=

""`"m1MOMOOMMOIMMINO

milOpMMOMMOMMOM

1010110MOOMMT"'v° v"MOMMOOMMOON INOOMMOMOOr "v""m9111MOMOOMMOM IMMOOMMOIOrm°'Nv°'"""""'"'OOMMOIROOMO ""OMMO MOM • MOOMMOOMMIV" VII 1213m151617187920m 2120191817161514131211109876543 2

percentage .NN: COMMUNITY 11111M CITY

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

70 + 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-0 40-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 1-4

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

405

69.8

77.6

Two-Family Households

3.4

1.3

Non-Family Households

155

26.7

21.1

TOTAL Number of Households

580

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single Detached

400

70.2

60.1

Single Attached

2.6

6.1

155

27.2

33.4

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Apartments Mobile Homes

TOTAL Dwellings

570

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Owned

300

52.6

52.9

Rented

270

47.4

47.1

TOTAL Dwellings

570

100%

Table 3:

Dwelling by Tenure

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Level of Schooling* (Males) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

395

59.0

Some High School

100

14.9

High School Graduate

11.2

Post High School Training

9.0

Some University

5.9

670

100%

TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

380

57.1

Some High School

115

17.3

High School Graduate

10.5

Post High School Training

3.8

Some University

11.3

665

100%

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 74

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Community Percentage

City Percentage

10.6

17.1

Clerical, Sales

140

26.9

38.0

Trades

215

41.3

32.9

Other, Not Stated

110

21.2

12.0

TOTAL

520

100%

Number Technical, Professional

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Community Percentage

City Percentage

10.4

20.7

145

60.4

64.1

Trades

8.3

4.7

Other, Not Stated

20.8

10.5

240

100%

Number Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales

TOTAL

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

City Percentage

425

87.6

92.6

12.4

7.4

485

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

185

84.1

91.9

15.9

8.1

220

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Community Percentage

Household Income

Total Number 570

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$7,307

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

EASTWOOD/MOUNT LAWN POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The population of this Community (3,785) has male/female proportions similar to the City average. There are more people in the 1-4 age group than the City average for both sexes (11% each compared to city's 9% each). There are also more people than average in the 20-24 age group (14% compared to 10% for males; 15% compared to 11% for females).

Marital status figures resemble the figures for the City averages.

The ethnic composition for males and females is quite similar to the City average with just slightly fewer people having an English mother tongue and slightly more having a Ukrainian mother tongue.

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING There are more one-family households in this area than the City averages (81% compared to 78%) and fewer non-family households. Dwelling type proportions are similar to figures for the City but there is a greater proportion of rental housing (54% compared to City average of 47%). 77

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Almost half of the population in this community not attending school full time has less than grade 10 education (males 49%, females 45%). Compared to the rest of the Corridor, fairly high proportions have post high school and university training (males 15%, females 13%), and the remainder have high school education.

There are fewer males with technical and professional occupations than average (10% compared to 17%) and more involved in trades (44% compared to 33%). Females have a slightly smaller proportion in technical, professional occupations (17% compared to City's 21%) and slightly more than average in trade occupations (10% compared to City's 5%).

At the time of the 1971 census the unemployment figures for both males and females were slightly higher than the City average (9% compared to 7% for males, 10% compared to 8% for females).

The average household income of $9,020 is less than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

1935

51.1

49.9

Female

1850

48.9

50.1

TOTAL Population

3785

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 2:

Marital Status Number

Single

1760

46.9

48.8

Married

1775

47.3

45.7

2.5

1.8

120

3.2

3.7

3750

100%

Divorced Widowed TOTAL

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1375

72.8

78.3

French

2.4

3.2

German

3.7

5.5

Italian

2.6

1.7

Dutch

1.4

Polish

2.1

1.3

195

10.3

6.9

Other

5.0

1.4

TOTAL

1890

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1290

71.3

78.5

French

1.9

3.4

German

3.9

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

Italian

2.8

1.5

Dutch

1.3

Polish

2.2

1.2

Ukrainian

200

11.0

7.0

Other

100

5.5

1.2

TOTAL

1810

100%

English

Indian & Eskimo

Ukrainian

Table 4:

Mother Tongue (Females) Number

English

FIGURE 9 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR EASTWOOD/MT. LAWN

age

IMOMOMOOMMOMOMIMOU'' i'mlIMOOMMOMOMMOMMOO IONOMONOOMMOOMMOOMV" 111MMOMMOMMOMMINIMMO 1111111111111111111111111 FEMALE 1111 111 MALE MOOMOMMOMOIr"A OMOOMMONOIMMOMMiliw' IOOMMOMOOMMOMOMMO MOMMOMOMOMMOOOMMO= v°'110011111111111111111110 OMMOMMOOMMOMOMMU" '"'11111MOMMOMM OMMOOMOMOMMOOMIP""' '9111111111111111 OMMO immummomr-"x"67% "OMOMMEMOMMOOMMO IMMOOMMOMMEMORM""' NNmIMOMMOOMMOOOMMO OMMOOMMOROMin %"A-""-milsrmommommin VOAVN, ,INgaimmumm "'"Nv IMOMOONINIV 00100110111ONP"'v "."111101111111111111 IMONOMMOMOr''''' vA'"'"'"91111111011iias 0111111 IMIOSOMOIOr'":"'" iiuiii OMMOOMMOOM"xw' MOMMOSOMMO

21201918171615141312111098765432

percentage k.'• COMMUNITY NE CITY

23456789101112131415161718192021

70 + 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 1-4

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

945

81.1

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.3

Non-Family Households

205

17.6

21.1

1165

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single Detached

675

58.7

60.1

Single Attached

1.7

6.1

455

39.6

33.4

TOTAL Number of Households

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Apartments Mobile Homes

TOTAL Dwellings

1150

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Owned

525

45.9

52.9

Rented

620

54.1

47.1

1145

100%

Table 3:

Dwelling by Tenure

TOTAL Dwellings

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Level of Schooling* (Males) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

660

48.5

Some High School

305

22.4

High School Graduate

195

14.3

Post High School Training

110

8.1

6.6

1360

100%

Some University TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

610

44.9

Some High School

355

26.1

High School Graduate

215

15.8

Post High School Training

6.6

Some University

6.6

1360

100%

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 83

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

110

9.7

17.1

Clerical, Sales

330

29.1

38.0

Trades

495

43.6

32.9

Other, Not Stated

200

17.6

12.0

1135

100%

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

110

16.5

20.7

Clerical, Sales

415

62.4

64.1

Trades

9.8

4.7

Other, Not Stated

11.3

10.5

665

100%

TOTAL

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1040

91.2

92.6

100

8.8

7.4

1140

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

595

90.2

91.9

9.8

8.1

660

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Household Income

Total Number 1160

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$9,020

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

i L

Tm,

6Lite

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The population of this community (720) has male/female proportions similar to the City averages. There are more persons of both sexes in the 10-20 age group (30% compared to 20% for males, 32% compared to 20% for females) and more in the 50-54 age group (8% compared to 4% for males, 10% compared to 5% for females.) As well, there are no females in the over 65 age group.

Marital status figures for this community are similar to the City averages.

There is a smaller proportion of males with an English mother tongue (70% compared to City's 78%) and a larger than average proportion with a Ukrainian mother tongue (14% compared to City's 7%). Females also have a smaller than average proportion with an English mother tongue (74% compared to City's 79%) and a larger than average proportion with a Ukrainian mother tongue (13% compared to City's 7%).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING This community has a very high proportion of one-family households (92% compared to City average of 78%). There is also an extremely high proportion of single detached 86

home (94% compared to the 60% City average) and very few apartments. Three-quarters of the dwellings in this community are owner-occupied.

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Nearly one-half of the population not attending school full time in this Community has less than grade 10 education (53% for males, 44% for females). A very small proportion has post high school or university training (9% for males, 6% for females).

There are fewer males than average in technical and professional occupations (10% compared to City's 17%) but near the City average for females in these occupations (19% compared to City's 21%).

At the time of the 1971 census, there were slightly more males unemployed than average (8% compared to City's 7%) but fewer women unemployed than average (4% compared to City's 8%).

The average household income of $9,624 is less than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

370

51.4

49.9

Female

350

48.6

50.1

TOTAL Population

720

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 2:

Marital Status

Single

375

53.2

48.8

Married

305

43.3

45.7

Divorced

1.4

1.8

Widowed

2.1

3.7

705

100%

TOTAL

Table 3:

Mother Tongue (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

260

70.3

78.3

French

2.7

3.2

German

6.8

5.5 .3

Indian & Eskimo

1.7

Italian 10

Dutch

2.7

1.4 1.3

Polish Ukrainian

13.5

6.9

Other

4.0

1.4

TOTAL

370

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

255

73.9

78.5

French

2.9

3.4

German

5.8

5.5

Table 4:

English

Mother Tongue (Females)

Indian & Eskimo

1.5

Italian Dutch

1.4

1.3 1.2

Polish Ukrainian

13.0

7.0

Other

2.9

1.2

TOTAL

345

100%

FIGURE 10 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR NORTHEAST INDUSTRIAL age

imumossommummorK"o% mnrnim-immummumummumni

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111" '11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 MALE MEMMEMMIIIII"A `NN-v1111111111111111111111111 FEMALE IN

imommsommommorwhN ":"74--lissummummommi

70 + 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54

111111111111111111111111111111111r""iuiiauieiiuiuui 111111111111111111111111111111111111"'"'" 11111111111 1111111111111111111111111111m'' /11111111111111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111r""' "N""1111111111111111111111111111111111 Nnu1111111111MMEMENN immummmErmisionLvh..\:\\7‘ onsimmoimmi h.% ik• 111.11 MIMI Mil

4540-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15-19

1111111111111NiaaVW""'"' ""'""Nii1111111111111111111111111 OVN NN1 r‘....ANNNNANNvo immummE 11111111111111111111111111111'"" v‘-"'' --I111111111111111111111111111111111 VOilimmoommi

21 20 79 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

percentage w COMMUNITY CITY

1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

10-14 5-9 1-4

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type

One-Family Households

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

165

91.7

77.6 1.3

Two-Family Households Non-Family Households TOTAL Number of Households

Table 2:

8.3

21.1

180

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

170

94.4

60.1

Dwelling By Type

Single Detached Single Attached

6.1

Apartments

5.6

Mobile Homes

33.4 .4

180

TOTAL Dwellings

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Owned

135

75.0

52.9

Rented

25.0

47.1

180

100%

Table 3:

Dwelling by Tenure

TOTAL Dwellings

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Level of Schooling* (Males) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

52.9

Some High School

26.5

High School Graduate

11.8

Post High School Training

8.8

170

100%

Some University TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

44.1

Some High School

32.4

High School Graduate

17.6

5.9

170

100%

Post High School Training Some University TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 92

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

10.0

17.1

Clerical, Sales

35.0

38.0

Trades

32.5

32.9

Other, Not Stated

22.5

12.0

200

100%

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

19.2

20.7

Clerical, Sales

65.4

64.1

3.8

4.7

11.5

10.5

130

100%

Trades Other, Not Stated TOTAL

Table 5:

Employment* (Males) Community Percentage

City Percentage

170

91.9

92.6

8.1

7.4

185

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

110

95.7

91.9

4.3

8.1

115

100%

Total Number

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$9,624

$10,153

Number Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Employment* (Females) Number

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Household Income

160

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

BALWIi POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The population of Balwin (5,785) has male/female proportions similar to that for the City. There are more persons of both sexes in the under 15 age group than the City average (39% compared to 31% for males, 38% compared to 30% for females). Also, there are fewer in the over 50 age group than average (10% (10% compared to 17% for males, 10% compared to 18% for females).

Marital status figures show more single (54% compared to 49%) and fewer married (42% compared to 46%) than the City average.

There are fewer males than average with an English mother tongue (71% compared to City's 78%) and more than average with a Ukrainian mother tongue (11% compared to City's 7%). Females also have a smaller than average proportion with an English mother tongue (72% compared to City's 79%) and slightly more with a Ukrainian mother tongue (11% compared to City's 7%).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Balwin has a very high proportion of one-family households (90%) and few non-family households. The area has more single detached and attached dwellings than the City

averages (69% and 10% compared to 60% and 6% respectively) and fewer apartments. There is also a higher proportion of home ownership than average (65% compared to City's 53%).

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Half the population not attending school full time has less than grade 10 education. Few of either sex have post high school or university training (10% for males, 9% for females).

There are fewer males than average in technical and professional occupations (9% compared to City's 17%) but more in trade occupations (48% compared to City's 33% average). There are also fewer women in technical and professional occupations than average (16% compared to City's 21%) and more in trades (9% compared to City's 5%). At the time of the 1971 census, the unemployment figures for males in Balwin were similar to the City average but there was a larger than average proportion of women unemployed (9% compared to 8%).

The average household income of $9,347 is less than the City average of $10,153.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

2955

51.1

49.9

Female

2830

48.9

50.1

TOTAL Population

5785

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 2:

Marital Status Number

Single

3120

53.9

48.8

Married

2425

41.9

45.7

Divorced

110

1.9

1.8

Widowed

130

2.2

3.7

5785

100%

TOTAL

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

2090

70.7

78.3

French

115

3.9

3.2

German

125

4.2

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

Italian

2.9

1.7

Dutch

1.2

1.4

Polish

1.5

1.3

Ukrainian

325

11.0

6.9

Other

125

4.2

1.4

TOTAL

2955

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 4:

Mother Tongue (Females) Number

English

2035

71.8

78.5

French

105

3.7

3.4

German

140

4.9

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

Italian

2.8

1.5

Dutch

1.3

Polish

1.4

1.2

305

10.8

7.0

Other

3.2

1.2

TOTAL

2835

100%

Ukrainian

FIGURE 11 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR BALWIN

age

mommummommr"v4 "IMMOMOMOMMOMMOMMI IMIMMOMMOOMMIMIMMON" "IMOOMMOIMOMMOMMOMMO MALE mommommi" MOMMEMOMOMM FEMALE MO mommummommirm' "^"WIMMOMMOMMEMOOMO mummommorw"Av '40MOOMMOMMOOMOMMO ommommummorx""S'"IMMOOMMOMMOIMMO mummummogx"v" "MOOMMOMMOMMOMMO mommummuxv '%''SAMOMMOMMOMOMMO

MONMOOMMOMMOMMF'""° ""OMMEMOMMOMMO MOMMEMOMMOOMM MOIMOOMMOOMW"" ^ '"'"^"'"IMMOMMOOMO MOOMMOMMOW" "00111011111111111 ONOMOMMOMOr""'"""" MOMMOOMO IMIMOMMISAr"'"" limmashugivv°Nv vo-Nv"wxvgasammommo ".1111MOMMOMOMMO ' mmommin

21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 109 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

percentage AN COMMUNITY CITY

23456789101112131415161718192021

70 + 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 1-4

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

1300

90.3

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.7

1.3

Non-Family Households

115

8.0

21.1

1440

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single Detached

955

68.7

60.1

Single Attached

145

10.4

6.1

Apartments

290

20.9

33.4

TOTAL Number of Households

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Mobile Homes

.4 100%

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Owned

910

65.0

52.9

Rented

490

35.0

47.1

1400

100%

TOTAL Dwellings

Table 3:

TOTAL Dwellings

1390

Dwelling by Tenure

100

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Level of Schooling* (Males)

Table 1:

Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

790

53.2

Some High School

335

22.6

High School Graduate

215

14.5

Post High School Training

6.1

Some University

3.7

1485

100%

TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

735

49.0

Some High School

390

26.0

High School Graduate

235

15.7

Post High School Training

6.3

Some University

3.0

1500

100%

TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 101

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

130

9.3

17.1

Clerical, Sales

375

26.9

38.0

Trades

675

48.4

32.9

Other, Not Stated

215

15.4

12.0

1395

100%

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

120

16.1

20.7

Clerical, Sales

480

64.4

64.1

Trades

9.4

4.7

Other, Not Stated

10.1

10.5

745

100%

TOTAL

102

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1335

92.4

92.6

110

7.6

7.4

1445

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

745

90.9

91.9

9.1

8.1

820

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Household Income

Total Number 1440

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$9,347

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

103

LVIE DE RE POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The Belvedere population (5,235) has male/female proportions similar to those of the City average. There are more people in the under 20 age category (47% compared to 40% for males, 45% compared to 39% for females) than the City average. There are also higher proportions of males and females in the over 70 age category (5% compared to 4% for males, 6% compared to 4% for females).

Marital status figures for Belvedere are similar to the City averages.

The ethnic composition for males shows a smaller than average proportion with an English mother tongue (70% compared to City's 78%) and a larger than average proportion with a Ukrainian mother tongue (11% compared to City's 7%). There is also a smaller than average proportion of females with an English mother tongue (71% compared to City's 79%) and a larger than average proportion with a Ukrainian mother tongue (11% compared to City's 7%).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Belvedere has a higher proportion of one-family households and a lower proportion of non-family households than the City averages (89% and 8% compared to 78% and 21%

104

respectively). The area has a high proportion of single detached homes (74% compared to City's 60%) and a relatively high proportion of mobile homes (2.4% compared to City's 0.4%). The area also has a higher than average proportion of owner occupied dwellings (70% compared to 53% for the City).

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Half the population of Belvedere not attending school full time has less than grade 10 education (52% for males, 47% for females). Another large proportion of this population has high school education while few have post high school or university training (13% for males, 12% for females).

There are fewer than average males and females employed in technical and professional occupations (9% and 13% compared to City's 17% and 21% respectively). There are more of both sexes in trade occupations (43% compared to City's 33% for males, 7% compared to City's 5% for females).

At the time of the 1971 census, there were slightly fewer males unemployed than average but more females unemployed (11% compared to City's 8%).

The average household income of $9,610 is less than the City average of $10,153.

105

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

2685

51.3

49.9

Female

2550

48.7

50.1

TOTAL Population

5235

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 2:

Marital Status Number

Single

2685

51.3

48.8

Married

2300

43.9

45.7

Divorced

1.2

1.8

Widowed

185

3.5

3.7

5235

100%

TOTAL

106

Table 3:

Mother Tongue (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

1850

69.8

78.3

French

115

4.3

3.2

German

140

5.3

5.5

Italian

1.7

Dutch

2.3

1.4

Polish

1.9

1.3

Ukranian

295

11.1

6.9

Other

115

4.3

1.4

TOTAL

2650

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Indian & Eskimo

Table 4:

Mother Tongue (Females) Number

English

1800

70.9

78.5

French

105

4.1

3.4

German

130

5.1

5.5

Italian

1.0

1.5

Dutch

2.4

1.3

Polish

1.4

1.2

Ukranian

270

10.6

7.0

Other

110

4.3

1.2

TOTAL

2540

100%

Indian & Eskimo

107

FIGURE 12 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR BELVEDERE

age

1111111111111111 1111111111111111116r" vvI'VOI1111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111110111111111111111111111111111`-' ":"'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II MALE 1111111111111111111111111!N '91111111111111111111111111 FEMALE MO I 111111111111111111111 prl=,=1: 11 I 111111111111 1 i 1 111101111 111 N 111111 lir I Illr "IlkNx." x'k:1:911111111 I 11111 iii iii EN imse ..1.-vv..... ovvv.,...4„..g. Oil wili . voN: MONOMMildi MIil mmosi mmo irev...............,,,.........."..viiii N. m i ilimmisoirmioll7\110%\'‘..NN V 7%,:''%,"•VC,10\V16.1101110.111111 1 ammo1mirr.:Nzxv%Avv%Nvi 'vvv.%:‘N.NNviviumi mini • op.....................AA.-.....44...,....N.4..;:v4,Nai •,,, NENE No

.„, r

\N i17% V N: V CN X1/474 INI VII

iiiiimmigableNN:NAANN.Nvi...vvio VIAN,:\NAVONV4011 0

65-69 60-64 55- 59 50-54 43- ,170 40-44 35 -39 30-35 25-29 20 13 -19 10- 1

lagalllip

5-9

am a

1-4

11111111111111Mair:RIAV.NAVVVVV4 VONVIk,INNA.I.N, \San 212019181716151413121110987654321

70 +

23456789101112131415161718192021

percentage NN, COMMUNITY CITY

108

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

1125

89.3

77.6

Two-Family Households

2.4

1.3

Non-Family Households

105

8.3

21.1

1260

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

TOTAL Number of Households

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type Number

Single Detached

895

74.3

60.1

Single Attached

5.8

6.1

205

17.0

33.4

2.9

1205

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Apartments Mobile Homes TOTAL Dwellings

Table 3:

Dwelling by Tenure Number

Owned

845

69.5

52.9

Rented

370

30.5

47.1

1215

100%

TOTAL Dwellings

109

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Level of Schooling* (Males) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

885

52.2

Some High School

390

23.0

High School Graduate

200

11.8

Post High School Training

130

7.7

5.3

1695

100%

Some University TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

790

47.0

Some High School

455

27.1

High School Graduate

240

14.3

Post High School Training

120

7.1

4.5

1680

100%

Some University TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. BO

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

130

9.4

17.1

Clerical, Sales

410

29.6

38.0

Trades

590

42.6

32.9

Other, Not Stated

255

18.4

12.0

1385

100%

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Community Percentage

City Percentage

12.8

20.7

510

68.9

64.1

Trades

7.4

4.7

Other, Not Stated

10.8

10.5

740

100%

Number Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales

TOTAL

111

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1245

92.9

92.6

7.1

7.4

1340

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

610

89.1

91.9

10.9

8.1

685

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Household Income

Total Number 1255

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$9,610

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

112

KENN POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The small Kennedale population (155) has a much higher proportion of males than the City average (58% compared to 50%). The age/sex structure is skewed with many more females than average in the 50-60 age group (20% compared to 8%); there is no one in the 60-64 age group, and more males and females over 70 than the City averages (6% compared to 4% for males, 7% compared to 4% for females).

Marital status figures for Kennedale are similar to the City averages.

There is very little ethnic mix in this area. Only mother tongues of English, French and Polish are represented among the males (81%, 13% and 6% respectively). Mother tongues of English, Dutch, Ukrainian and "other" are represented among the females (70%, 10%, 10%, 10% respectively).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Household type figures are similar to the City averages for this community. All the dwellings are single detached, with half being ownedâ&#x20AC;&#x17E; and half being rented.

113

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS High proportions of males and females have less than grade 10 education (59% for males, 82% for females). Few males have post high school or university training (6%) and no females have such training. . High proportions of males are employed in trades (46%) and "other," and "not stated", which includes agriculture (46%). Females are employed in clerical, sales (80%) or "other," and "not stated". At the time of the 1971 census, there were more males than average unemployed in this area (10% compared to City's 7%) and many more females unemployed than average (25% compared to City's 8%).

The average household income of $5,779 is less than the City average of $10,153.

114

POPULATION CHARACTER I ST I CS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

58.1

49.9

Female

41.9

50.1

155

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single

48.3

48.8

Married

48.3

45.7

TOTAL Population

Table 2:

Marital Status

1.8

Divorced Widowed TOTAL

3.4

3.7

145

100%

115

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

English

81.3

78.3

French

12.5

3.2

German

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

Italian

1.7 5

Dutch

6.2

1.4

Polish

1.3

Ukrainian

6.9

Other

1.4

TOTAL

Table 4:

English

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

70.0

78.5

Mother Tongue (Females)

French

3.4

German

5.5

Indian & Eskimo

Italian Dutch

1.5 5

10.0

Polish

1.3 1.2

Ukrainian

10.0

7.0

Other

10.0

1.2

TOTAL

100%

116

FIGURE 13 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR KENNEDALE age

1111111111111111111111111111111111WNw"` "'"IMIIII11111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111M6V`" m91111M1111111111111111111111111111111 FEMALE ii MALE 111111111111111111111Erm" 11111111111111111111111111111111NP" .Nw -iNigiam Emma= munimmErnommiirNv‘-‘'N kxv"Iedailia 111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111" IIuaIIIIIlIIII 111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111MMI momummommisriz"z"-N, AvioNv‘Nammiumumommom mismimmummursoovLNx NvoNvolimmommummum ImmummoirminvkA.x"L-:‘ 4:•••:"%7Nzga-ummummumumEm

70 + 65-69 60-64 55 - 59 50-54 4540-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15 - 19

111111.111111111aV‘:":"'"NV

'''"'w&N"ammill111111111111111111 "b```.`v`11"•11111110111111111111111111111111 0

10 - 14 5-9

1111111111111111.11111"1111"NNV"N 11011111111111MWWNXV"‘NV 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

1-4

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

percentage kx'N COMMUNITY CITY

117

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Table 1:

Households by Type

One-Family Households

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

77.8

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.3

Non-Family Households

22.2

21.1

TOTAL Number of Households

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 2:

Dwelling By Type

Single Detached

100

Single Attached

6.1

Apartments

33.4

Mobile Homes

TOTAL Dwellings

Table 3:

60.1

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Dwelling by Tenure

Owned

52.9

Rented

47.1

TOTAL Dwellings

100%

118

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Level of Schooling* (Males) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

58.8

Some High School

29.4

5.9

100%

High School Graduate Post High School Training Some University TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Under Grade 10

Community Percentage

81.8

Some High School

9.1

High School Graduate

9.1

100%

Post High School Training Some University TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 119

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage 17.1

Technical, Professional 5

7.7

38.0

Trades

46.15

32.9

Other, Not Stated

46.15

12.0

TOTAL

100%

Clerical, Sales

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Number

Community Percentage

20.7

Technical, Professional Clerical, Sales

80.0

TOTAL

64.1 4.7

Trades Other, Not Stated

City Percentage

20.0

10.5 â&#x20AC;˘

100%

120

Table 5:

Employment* (Males) Community Percentage

City Percentage

90.0

92.6

10.0

7.4

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

75.0

91.9

25.0

8.1

100%

Number Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Employment* (Females) Number

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Household Income

Total Number 50

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$5,779

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

121

STEELE HEIC`-' POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The population of Steele Heights (4,670) has male/female proportions similar to the City average. The age/sex structure is skewed with high proportions of people in the 25-35 age group (24% compared to 15% for males and 27% compared to 14% for females) and in the under 10 age groups (36% compared to 20% for males; 35% compared to 19% for females). There are very few people in the over 50 age group.

Marital status figures show more single persons than average (54% compared to City's 49%) and fewer divorced and widowed (0.6% and 0.5% compared to City's 1.8% and 3.7% respectively) than average. There is less ethnic mix for both sexes with more people having an English mother tongue than the City average (81% compared to City's 78%).

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING There is an extremely high proportion of one-family households (97%) and few nonfamily households in this area. There is a much higher proportion of single attached dwellings than the City average (38% compared to 6%) and very few apartments: Threequarters of the dwellings are owner occupied.

122

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Approximately one-third of the population not attending school full time has less than grade 10 education. There are higher proportions with post high school or university training than the rest of the Corridor (except Cromdale/ Bellevue (19% for males, 16% for females).

Slightly fewer males than average are employed in technical and professional occupations (16% compared to City's 17%) but an average proportion of females are employed in these occupations. The proportions of males and females in the other occupation groups are similar to the City averages.

At the time of the 1971 census, half the average proportion of males were unemployed (4% compared to City's 7%) and slightly more females than average were unemployed (9% compared to City's 8%).

The average household income of $10,555 makes this the only community in the Corridor to exceed the City average of $10,153.

123

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Male-Female Population Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Male

2355

50.4

49.9

Female

2315

49.6

50.1

TOTAL Population

4670

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Table 2:

Marital Status Number

Single

2510

54.1

48.8

Married

2075

44.7

45.7

Divorced

1.8

Widowed

3.7

4640

100%

TOTAL

124

Mother Tongue (Males)

Table 3:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1900

81.7

78.3

French

1.7

3.2

German

4.1

5.5

English

Indian & Eskimo

Italian

1.7

Dutch

3.0

1.4

Polish

1.3

125

5.4

6.9

Other

3.0

1.4

TOTAL

2325

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1870

81.5

78.5

French

2.6

3.4

German

3.9

5.5

Ukrainian

Table 4:

Mother Tongue (Females) Number

English

Indian & Eskimo Italian

1.5

Dutch

3.1

1.3

Polish

1.2

115

5.0

7.0

Other

2.8

1.2

TOTAL

2295

100%

Ukrainian

125

FIGURE 14 AGE -SEX STRUCTURE FOR STEELE HEIGHTS age

mommommommur"- ""IMMOOMMOMOMMOOMMO mommommommumw miummlimmi 'IMEMOMOIOMMOOMMOMMO FEMALE MO on MALE mommommirmift mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmr-" "'"IMMOOMMOMMOMMOMO mommommoommimmom m"411111111MOOMOMIIMOM "IMMOOMMINIMMEMOM mommummmor""

'91IMMOMMOMMOOMMOM MOOMMOMMOOMMOW""'` lIMMOOMMOMMOMMO IMIMMOMMOMORNW' IMIMMOMMINIQNQW"' "'"niONSWIMMOOMMEMO liONNQNAMMOMM mmommommombur -4""c"--b-N sommummir-""""N"k-NN"--"=" mummomommo 'U1111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111! ig v‘:%,7Avilk,vvviAngim immingtigv IlligaisauwoNvoNvoxioNv uuII 11111111NANaligiga'°:"'"Nv`w" "```"'"311111bilg4 vain

21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

2 1

70 + 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 4540-44 35-39 30-35 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 1-4

2 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021

percentage s.N. COMMUNITY NM CITY

126

HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSING Households by Type

Table 1:

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

One-Family Households

1065

96.8

77.6

Two-Family Households

1.3

Non-Family Households

2.3

21.1

1100

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Single Detached

620

56.6

60.1

Single Attached

420

38.4

6.1

5.0

33.4

TOTAL Number of Households

Dwelling By Type

Table 2:

Apartments

Mobile Homes TOTAL Dwellings

Table 3:

1095

100%

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Dwelling by Tenure Number

Owned

805

73.5

52.9

Rented

290

26.5

47.1

1095

100%

TOTAL Dwellings

127

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 1:

Level of Schooling* (Males) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

450

38.8

Some High School

275

23.7

High School Graduate

215

18.5

Post High School Training

100

8.6

Some University

120

10.3

1160

100%

TOTAL

Table 2:

Level of Schooling* (Females) Number

Community Percentage

Under Grade 10

375

31.5

Some High School

395

33.2

High School Graduate

225

18.9

Post High School Training

100

8.4

8.0

1190

100%

Some University TOTAL

* Population 5 years and over not attending school full-time. 128

Table 3:

Labour Force by Occupations (Males) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

170

15.5

17.1

Clerical, Sales

370

33.8

38.0

Trades

430

39.3

32.9

Other, Not Stated

125

11.4

12.0

1095

100%

TOTAL

Table 4

Labour Force by Occupations (Females) Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

Technical, Professional

120

20.7

Clerical, Sales

360

62.1

64.1

Trades

4.3

4.7

Other, Not Stated

12.9

10.5

580

100%

TOTAL

129

Table 5:

Employment* (Males)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 6:

Community Percentage

City Percentage

1080

96.4

92.6

3.6

7.4

1120

100%

Number

Community Percentage

City Percentage

555

91.0

91.9

9.0

8.1

610

100%

Employment* (Females)

Employed Unemployed TOTAL

Table 7:

Number

Household Income

Total Number 1105

Average Community Household Income

Average City Household Income

$10,555

$10,153

* Population Aged 15+ by Labour Activity Type.

130

CHAPTER 111 SUMMARY, CONÂ° U :ONS AND IMPLICATIONS

From a preliminary analysis of the data presented in this report, certain significant findings can be stated as particularly relevant to the conduct, as well as the conclusions arrived at in the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor Study. For example, the data indicate that the communities which are in close proximity to the central business district have certain shared characteristics which are similar to those generally found in the Inner City. The communities which are further north and east tend to have socio-economic characteristics that are generally associated with suburban communities. To illustrate, the communities closest to the City centre are McCauley, Riverlot 20, Riverview and Riverview Industrial. Among the shared characteristics indicated by the data are: An average household income that is lower than the City average; A greater concentration of ethnic groups other than English, notably Ukrainian; An unemployment rate which is higher than that of the City as a whole; A high percentage of small and non-family households; A high percentage of rental and apartment accommodation; A higher than City average of residents with low educational attainment level and low status occupation.

In the case of coiimunities such as Balwin, Belvedere, and Steele Heights which are in the most northeastern section of the Corridor, the overall demographic profile of 131

these communities seems to be different. The available data indicates that the average household income rate of residents of these communities are quite similar to the City average. As well, the proportions of one-family households, home ownership and single-family dwelling units are significantly higher than those of the communities closest to the City centre. Similar trends are also indicated with regard to educational level and occupational status in these communities.

Cromdale/Bellevue, Cromdale, Parkdale and Santa Rosa are communities which are midway along the corridor; and in terms of their overall socio-economic characteristics, they may best be described as falling within a "middle range". That is, while they share similar characteristics such as high homeownership with the most northeasterly communities, they also have some characteristics - such as a average household income that is lower than the City average - which would place them in the same category as the communities closest to the city centre. Ostensibly, these communities or neighbourhoods have been and are presently experiencing some degree of change. To what extent the characteristics of communities near the inner city or those near the suburbs will become predominant, will depend on the rate of growth and redevelopment in these areas in the future.

Looking ahead to the possible impacts of the construction and operation of the rapid transit system, it can be stated that this will inevitably have significant implications for the physical, as well as the socio-economic conditions of individual communities within the corridor. Consequently, in the conduct of the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor Study, major considerations will need to be given these factors. It 132

will be necessary, for instance, to evaluate the possible impacts of rapid transit with respect to the present and future economic conditions in each of the communities. How might rapid transit affect, for example, the employment situation, particularly in those communities near the City centre? Will employment opportunities increase or decrease, or will the situation remain the same? Similarly, how might rapid transit affect land and property values in the areas and how might this change be dealt with so that maximum benefits are accrued on an individual, as well as on a community wide level.

In terms of other socio-economic factors, it will be also necessary to consider in the Study the social aspects such as the adequacy of public services and facilities available in individual communities, and the possible effects on these created by rapid transit. Moreover, consideration will need to be given to the uniquiness of each community; that is, the social fabric and character of each of the communities and the possible ways in which the community or neighbourhood will be affected by rapid transit.

As envisioned, the dimensions of some impacts will be quantitative, easily identified and measurable. The analysis however, will not be limited to these; it will also include those impacts and their dimensions which are of a more qualitative nature. It must also be pointed out, that how the impacts are perceived - whether they are positive or negative or whether they are of any significance - will to a large extent, depend on individual interests and situations, as well as on the social, economic and physical conditions existing in the communities potentially affected by rapid transit. 133

It is with the above factors in mind that both historic as well as current data on each of the communities will need to be collected and analyzed. The data and information on each of the fourteen communities presented in this report can therefore be considered as representing a major stage in the conduct of the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor Study.

134