^
V
THE DISTRICT PLANNING PROGRAM STATUSREPORT
November, 1987
The District Planning Program - Status Report Page I.
INTRODUCTION
n.
THE DISTRICT PLANNING PROGRAM 1982 -1987
m.
THE DISTRICT PLANNING PROGRAM 1988 ONWARDS
IV.
BASIC PLANNING INFORMATION AND SERVICES
1.
Community Communication
3. 4.
Resident Opinion Survey Neighbourhood Problem Solving
2.
V.
NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
1. 2. 3. 4. VI.
Neighbourhood Improvement DataBase
Improvement Projects Identified in Existing Neighbourhood Plans The A.M.P.L.E. Neighbourhood Program The Beautify Edmonton Program Neighbourhood Plans, Special Area Plans and Special Studies
CAPITAL CITY CORE AREA INITIATIVE
Vn. CONCLUSION
Appendices
THE DISTRICT PLANNING PROGRAM - STATUS REPORT
I.
INTRODUCTION The Planning and Building Department has carried out its community-based planning activities through the District Planning Program. In this Program, the neighbourhood has been recognized as the basic building block for all planning activities in the City. The main clients for the planning services
offered under the Program have been community residents, local Community League organizations and local business organizations.
The Program is committed to fostering the two-way communication of issues and decisions between local interest groups on the one hand, and the civic
administration and Council on the other. Through this communications
emphasis, and a related commitment to improving and maintaining a City-wide, area-by-area, data bank of land use and socio-economic, demographic information, the Program would help ensure a high level of public
awareness of civic proposals and actions and the reasons for decisions affecting communities.
The activities of the Program are organized on the basis of six Planning Districts: Central, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, Southwest and West
(refer to Map 1 - District Planning Boundaries). The neighbourhoods served through the Program are listed in Table 1 - Neighbourhoods and Industrial Areas of Edmonton.
11.
THE DISTRICT PLANNING PROGRAM 1982 -1987
Since 1982 when the District Planning Program was initiated, the Program has had two major streams of activity, each using approximately 50% of the Program's resources. These are:
1.
The preparation of detailed plans for neighbourhoods and special areasl (involving 24 neighbourhoods, primarily in the inner city), and
The plans undertaken during this five year period included: Parkdale Area
Redevelopment Plan (ARP), Montrose/SantaRosa ARP, Central McDougall ARP, Coliseum Station ARP, Stadium Station ARP, Queen Mary Park ARP, West-Ingle ARP, Scona East ARP, North Saskatchewan River Valley ARP, Cloverdale ARP, Rossdale ARP, Northlands ARP (under preparation), 114 Street LRT Corridor Study (ARP may result). Old Strathcona ARP (amendment study under preparation), Calgary Trail Land Use Study (including Gateway Park proposal), Britannia/Youngstown Neighbourhood Planning Study, Highlands Neighbourhood Planning Study, 100 Avenue Planning Study, Garneau-109 Street Study, and the Oliver/Westmount/Inglewood AMPLE Neighbourhood Program, These areas are shown on Map 2.
DISTRICT PLANNING BOUNDARIES MAP 1
L
northeast
WEST
SOUTHWEST
iuaust
7
AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLANS, NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING STUDIES AND SPECIAL AREA STUDIES
MAP 2 ARSA rlE2EV£lJPM£KT PL««
A. B.
We9t-Ingl4 aueen :<ary Par*
C. D. E. r. G.
Montrose/Sjnta Soa* CoIls*'ja Station Stadtua Station Nortn Saakatcnewan Alvar Cloverdal«
H.
?To93daIe
I.
ParKdale
J.
Soona Cast
K.
Old Stratncona
L.
Garneau
H,
CsnCral HsDajgall
S.
Nortnianaa
HEICHBQURHQOD HHP SPECIAL AREA STUDIES
N.
Caljary Trail Land tja« Stu<Sy
0.
Sritannla/Toungstoun Wetgnbournood Study
Q.
Hlgnlands Hetgn&ourhood Study 'OD Avenue Planning Study
R.
119 Street LHT Corridor Planning Study
1982 -87
2.
The preparation of a comprehensive information base for all residential neighbourhoods and industrial areas in the
City (resulting in the preparation ofa succinct planning report on each of the 182 residential neighbourhoods and on each of the City's six Planning Districti^.2
These planning reports have provided the major policy direction for the community based planning activities and underpin the revised General Municipal Plan. Other key Program activities which have provided information and continue to feed public input back into the Program include:
day-to-day contact with citizens and community groups to relay information on local planning issues, development applications and local improvement projects; the preparation of a series of background working papers, at the District level, providing in-depth technical information on such
topics as population, land use and development, transportation, the natural environment and municipal services;
the preparation of Neighbourhood Fact Sheets, which provide basic "people facts" and information on land use and municipal services for individual neighbourhoods; the preparation of detailed Land Use Maps at the District and City-wide scale;
a Resident Opinion Survey, which, by contacting one in every 30 households in Edmonton, documented citizens' opinions on municipal issues and services; and
the dissemination of Neighbourhood Improvement Checklists, which have been used to get feedback from communities on neighbourhood needs.
Prior to the initiation of this Program, the Planning and Building Department focussed its community planning efforts solely on four or five neighbourhoods at one time and had virtually no connection with the remaining 170 plus neighbourhoods in the City. Through the efforts of the past five years, connection has been made.
Through these efforts, the Planning and Building Department has established a very effective and responsive information/communications system within which to carry out a wide range of planning and implementation activities.
Indeed, the Pro^am provides a model for other large cities in Canada and the
United States in providing an equitable level of planning service to all neighbourhoods in the City.
District Planning Reports and several Neighbourhood Reports are attached as
Appendices I-Vn. Essentially these reports provide a long term, conceptual
non-statutory, they offer local policy direction in a non-prescriptive, flexible manner and therefore complement the revised General Municipal Plan which is strategic and, necessarily, "top-down" in its approach.
III.
THE DISTRICT PLANNING PROGRAM 1988 ONWARDS
The primary thrust of the District Planning Program for 1988 onwards involves a smft towards a more proactive, implementation mode together with the steady development of a corporate approach to community improvement activities. The shift is also to trouble spots and areas of greatest opportunity.
Providing a basic level of planning services to all neighbourhoods in the City sets the foundation for the Program. The neighbourhood is the basic building block for disseminating information on people, land use and civic activities. This activity will continue and should account for approximately 10% of Program resources in 1988.
A much greater emphasis will be placed on developing a strong corporate commitment to the implementation of small scale, neighbourhood level improvement projects. The objective is to bring together community needs and civic actions, with a particular focus on special needs neighbourhoods and areas
of major opportunity. The intent will be to identify improvement projects through a review of existing Area Redevelopment Plans, through the ARflPLE Neighbourhood Program, through the "Beautify Edmonton" Program, and through the preparation and implementation of neighbourhood plans and
^ecial area plans and studies. Appendix VIII, entitled Neighbourhood
Selection Report, provides a preliminary assessment of neighbourhoods requiring further civic attention. Approximately 75% of Program resources will be directed to these activities in 1988.
A significant new thrust of the Program will be an effort to initiate a revitalization program for Edmonton's central area. This will involve
economic, social and physical renewal in the Downtown and surrounding core
area neighbourhoods. As in Winnipeg, such a program could ultimately, although, not necessarily, bring together the three levels of government and the private sector in a major urban revitalization effort. In 1988 the research, coordination, and community development activities associated with this project would account for approximately 15%ofProgram resources.
In summary, the activities of the Program from 1988 onward can be grouped under the following headings: Basic Planning Information and Services
Neighbourhood Plans and Improvement Projects Capital City Core Area Initiative
These activities are described in the following three Sections and outlined on
Table 2. The reader should also consult the Appendices attached to this Report for more information. IV.
BASIC PLANNING INFORMATION AND SERVICES
The need for a comprehensive, relevant, up-to-date information base to
facilitate meaningful discussion of issues with community groups has long
been recognized. While considerable effort in the Program has been directed to the creation of such a comprehensive communication/information system, the system is quite easy to maintain onceestablished and operating.
TABLE 2 - THE DISTRICT PLANNING PROGRAM 1988 ONWARDS
Basic Planning Information and Services "serving all of the City's neighbourhoods"
Neighbourhood Plans and Improvement Projects "selecting some neighbourhoods for special
1. Community Communication .
1. Improvement Projects From Existing Plans
• • •
•
attention"
day-to-day contact with citizens and groups to relay information on community planning matters ongoing contact with Area Councils contact, as required, with Community Leagues and local business groups providing user-friendly information:
•
identiflcation of outstanding capital improvement commitments in existing Area Redevelopment Plans, Neighbourhood Planning Studies and other planning studies; four year action plans to implement the improvements
2.
Neighbourhood Pact Sheets: basic neighbourhood
A.M.P.L.E. Neighbourhood Program •
facu.
Neighbourhood Reports: neighbourhood issues and
budgeted, planned or potential improvement projects
•
neighbourhoods, Downtown, central North
Saskatchewan River Valley, Edmonton Municipal Airport, Edmonton Northlands and 3 major railway yards
identification and initiation of small scale improvement or beautiilcation projects at the neighbourhood level
•
Neighbourhood Plans, Special Area Plans and Special Studies
•
preparation, review and update of:
Edmontonians' views on a wide range of municipal
Area Redevelopment Plans: comprehensive, in-depth land use plans for neighbourhoods or special geographic
issues and services
areas (statutory documents)
day-to-day problem solving for citizens and groups
Neighbourhood Planning Studies: similar to an ARP but less comprehensive, dealing with selective issues (non-statutory documents)
requiring quick resolutions to neighbourhood level
Special Studies: examination of topics which are non-
4. Neighbourhood Problem Solving issues.
ultimately, a comprehensive tri-level
government funded program with major private sector involvement
4.
•
3. Resident Opinion Survey
involving a concentration of neighbourhoods and areas "in need", "Vith emerging troubles" and "with major opportunities", namely: 17 residential neighbourhoods, 3 partial
implementation of neighbourhood improvements in selected
2. Neighbourhood Improvement Data Base a corporate system to document, at the local level,
social and physical issues of the core area
3. The "Beautify Edmonton Program"
opportunities
•
a revitalization program a&lressing the economic,
inner city communities in conjunction with infrastructure and street upgrading projects
opportunities
District Planning Reports: district level issues and
Core Area Initiative
"targeting of Core Area neighbourhoods for mtyor urban revitalization"
geographic or non-community oriented (non-statutory documents)
revitalization measures could include, amongst others: area rovitalization, community development, downtown development corporation projects, core area housing, business revitalization, heritage conservation, employment training and development, social action plans and public safety immediate actions could include: establish
council commitment; improve communication, coordination and promotion at the corporate level; develop a comprehensive program and a process lu phase it in.
The activities which are included as basic planning information and services are:
1.
Community Communication, involving:
contact with citizens on a day-to-day basis to relay information on local planning issues, development applications and local improvement projects; contact with Area Councils on an ongoing basis and with Community Leagues and local business groups as required; disseminating user-friendly information on neighbourhood planning, namely:
(a)
Neighbourhood Fact Sheets - basic facts on existing land use, population, housing and community facilities for every neighbourhood and business area in the City;
b)
Neighbourhood Reports - conceptual representation of potential long term (15-20 years) development ideas, identifying a possible "wish list" of planning and public works initiatives, for every neighbourhood and business area in the City. See Appendix Vn for some examples; and
c)
District Planning Reports - an overview of each District,
identifying issues, opportunities and a concept of the possible long term physical development of the District. 2.
Neighbourhood Improvement Data Base, involving: establishing, with other civic Departments, a corporate system to document budgeted, planned or potential projects which functionally or aesthetically improve the quality of residential areas
and some business areas. This "inventory" will help the City determine whether or not neighbourhoods are being treated
relatively equitably in terms ofcapital improvement expen^tures.
It will also guide better coordination of the City's activities to increase the effectiveness of the improvement measures. 3.
Resident Opinion Survey, involving: undertaking an in-depth survey of City residents to obtain an accurate and representative cross section of Edmontonians' views on
a wide range of municipal issues and services.
4.
Neighbourhood Problem Solving, involving:
providing day-to-day assistance and problem solving to citizens,
community ^oups and local business organizations who require
quick resolutions to particular neighbourhood level issues. This
activity may include putting a citizen in touch with the right person in the administration, providing professional advice on a land use or
procedural problem, or assisting groups to formulate positions and mitiate appropriate action.
V.
NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
The Planning and Building Department is responsible for the preparation of
statutory pla^js and planning studies, and for submitting them to City Council for formal approval. These plans and studies have historically identified
primarily land use-related community problems and proposed workable solutions, often requiring compromise between citizen groups and development industry interests. Improvements to infrastructure and other City facilities have often been proposed in these plans and studies, but a mechanism for implementing these types of recommendations has seldom been worked out. As a result, such improvements have seldom been built. The challenge for neighbourhood planning from 1988 onward will be to establish a strong corporate commitment to implement the improvements recommended in these plans and studies. The key to implementation is funding.
With the demise of funding programs from senior governments, the City has had to rely increasingly on its own limited resources. The new A.M.P.L.E. Neighbourhood Program is one example of how corporate resources and funds can be coordinated to more effectively and efficiently address neighbourhood needs.
The activities which are included as neighbourhood plans and improvement projects are: 1.
Improvement Projects Identified in Existinef Neighbourhood Plansanvolving;
reviewing all "post Neighbourhood Improvement Program" Plans, including Area Redevelopment Plans, Neighbourhood Planning Studies, and other special planning studies, to identify outstanding capital improvement commitments. The Planning and Building Department, in consultation with other civic Departments, will seek Council's approval of a four year action plan to carry out the commitments and, where desirable, to implement newly identified projects in the neighbourhoods. This Plan review will not involve a thorough review and update of all land use districts and related land
use issues in the neighbourhoods. This more thorough Plan review process will be undertaken separately, in accordance with the overall priorities for Plan preparation. (Refer to Section V.4. below.)
2.
The A.M.P.L.E. Neighbourhood Program, involving: assisting communities selected for A.M.P.L.E, (Alberta Municipal Partnership in Local Employment) infrastructure and street
upgrading projects.
In addition to any outstanding Plan
commitments, other emer^ng or changing needs for neighbourhood
improvements will be identified and priorized considering
community preferences, to take advantage of opportunities to implement them along with infrastructure and street works. In this
way, coordination of the City's resources will not only reduce costs and disruption and improve efficiency, but also help maintain some of Edmonton's older neighbourhoods as attractive and vital communities.
3,
The "Beautify Edmonton Program", involving:
using theBeautify Edmonton Pro^am to identify andinitiatesmall
scale improvement or beautification projects at the neighbourhood level. This Pro^am applies to whole of the City. A comprehensive, preliminary information base to identify potential beautification
efforts has already been established through the District Planning Program - the information documented in the Neighbourhood Reports, District Reports and the Neighbourhood Improvement Checklists.
4.
Neighbourhood Plans. Special Area Plans and Special Studies, involving:
preparing, reviewing and updating Area Redevelopment Plans,
Neighbourhood Planning Studiesand other special planning studies as requested by local residents and approved by City Council. The Planning and Building Department s Neighbourhood Selection Report and annual budgeting process will help identify the Plans and studies which are tobe initiated.
A description of the types ofPlans and studies and an indication of 1988 activities is provided below: (a)
Area Redevelopment Plans (ARP's) - These are
comprehensive, in- depth land use and capital improvement plans for neighbourhoods or special geographic areas, primarily involving inner city neighbourhoods. They are statutory documents adopted by Bylaw in accordance with the Planning Act. In 1988, the Department will be involved in the Northlands ARP and an ARP for part of the 114 Street LRT Corridor Study area. An update of two or three existing ARP's in the Central District, such as the Riverdale, Groat Estate
and Boyle Street/McCauley Plans, may also be initiated in 1988.
(b)
Neighbourhood Planning Studies - These are similar to an ARP, except a comprehensive planning approach and an extensive citizen participation process is not necessarily required. These are non-statutory documents, approved of by a resolution of Council. The Department may be involved in preparing one such Study in 1988.
(c) ' Special Studies - These may involve the examination of a topic which is non-geographic or non community oriented in nature, or which might apply to a number of locations in the City. These may have a design emphasis. In 1988, the
Department will undertake special studies involving a Heritage Trail extension (a feasibility study with a community consultation and urban design emphasis), the Kingsway Avenue Business Revitalization Zone (BRZ) and the
Stony Plain Road business area.
For all of the above Plans and studies, the Planning and Building Department will, in 1988, place a new emphasis on improving implementation through:
obtaini^ig a commitment from key civic Departments in Plan preparation,
public consultation andcapital improvement funding,
providing an implementation budget, process and schedule, and providing an annual progress review of implementation activities to Council.
VI.
CAPITAL CITY CORE AREA INITIATIVE
The decline of the inner city, and especially those core area neighbourhoods surrounding the Downtown, has been a persistent fact since the 1960's as population shifted to the suburbs. There is a need to arrest and reverse
negative trends in the physical environment, housing, unemployment,
infrastructure and community image. Yet ever since the demise of the
federally-sponsored Neighbourhood Ii^rovement Program (N.I.P.) and Community Services Program (C.S.P.), Edmonton has not had an ongoing
program specifically aimed at increasing the quality of Edmonton's older neighbourhoods.
The Capital City Core Area Initiative, which is briefly outlined below and described in detail in Appendix IX, is basically an adaptation of a very successful core area revitalization program which has been underway in Winnipeg since 1981.
A core area of neighbourhoods requiring special attention was determined through the District Planning Program's 1987 "neighbourhood selection
process" which evaluated the health of all neighbourhoods in the inner city.
Through this evaluation, 20 "community health" indicators were considered
under the five general categories of "people", "community fabric", "physical
character", "urban design", and "external pressures". This evaluation showed that there is a significant concentration of two types of neighbourhoods - those "in need" and those "with major opportunities -around a core area on both
sidesofthe North Saskatchewan River. This target area is shownon Map3.
Altogether, the "neighbourhoods in need" in this core area are significantly different from the rest of the City in terms of the wide range of "community health" indicators. These core area neighbourhoods contain:
the highest incidence of poverty and unemplojrment; the greatest number of "special needs" population groups such as single parents, the elderly, and new immigrants; the greatest supply but also the greatest need for a variety of social service and housing programs; the poorest quality housing stock; several deteriorating commercial areas; the most significant number of major land use conflicts and environmental disturbances;
the greatest pressure forland use change and redevelopment; and the oldest and most deteriorated infrastructure.
LOCATION
CAPITAL CITY CORE AREA INITIATIVE TARGET AREA MAP 3
MtlMCML
6A9TWOOO
(D«0
PRMCfi m;P6RT
VAUEYKfMft) OUfiCN MAAV
central MeOCVOAU
ueCAUUV
CM. LANDS
CLOVtHOALt
Wtn VAUtV VCTOHU
^iven vAuiY WALmOAiJ
POPULATION- 70,373 AREA- 12.66 sq. mL 70.28
The Core Area Initiative would cover a 12.5 square mile area in central
Edmonton which contains a population of approximately 80,000 people. It would encompass 17 residential neighbourhoods, parts of three more residential neighbourhoods, the Downtown, the central North Saskatchewan
River Valley, Edmonton Municipal Airport, Edmonton Northlands and three major railway yards -- CN Downtown, CPR West and CPR Irvine.
The Capital City Core Area Initiative would bring together the three levels of government and the private sector in a coordinated effort to address the economic, social and physical issues in the core area. The intent would be to pool government and private efforts to maximize the effectiveness of increasingly scarce resources. While a comprehensive tri-level government funded program would be the
ultimate goal, a phased in approach, starting with simply improving promotion and coordination, is recommended at this time. The types of programs which could be applied in this area are listed below under the categories Civic Action, Stimulating Economic Growth, and Improving the Social and Cultural Environment.
(a)
Civic Action Area Revitalization
Community Development Community Improvement Infrastructure and Streetscape Upgrading (b)
Stimulating Economic Growth
Downtown Development Corporation Projects Railway Relocation and Redevelopment Core Area Housing
Neighbourhood Main Streets/Business Revitalization
Heritage Conservation Small Business/Industrial Development/Housing Rehabilitation Employment Training and Education
(c)
Improving the Social and Cultural Environment Multi-Culturalism Social Action Plans
Services to New Immigrants Public Safety
An exploration of the Core Area Initiative concept must start with the realization that there are a number of effective revitalization measures already being taken by the City, other levels ofgovernment and the private sector.
The administrative and implementation framework of a Core Area pro^am and the first steps in beginning such an initiative are discussed in detail in Appendix IX and outlined in briefbelow. District Planning Program staff would be involved in detailing the concept's objectives, programs and administrative framework. In general terms, it will
be necessary to first, create the vision; second, secure political support for the idea; and, finally, mobilize the technical, financial and administrative resources to undertake the work.
The following immediate actions would have to be taken to start the process on its way: 1) 2) 3)
Establish Council commitment to the concept in principle; Establish a task force to undertake community development; and Set up a Core Area Project Team, with the mandate and budget to: a) b)
VII
establish Phase I of the Initiative, immediately improving communications, coordination and promotion in the core area; and develop a more comprehensive program and a process to phase it in.
CONCLUSION
The District Planning Program will continue to function as a responsive user-friendly system of planning services and information, designed for ready access by community groups, businesses and citizens at large. The Program will continue to emphasize the neighbourhood as the basic unit for delivering planning services and initiating physical improvements. Initially, the Program had a significant research component. Over time, however, there has been a redirection towards implementation measures. It is expected that the Planning and Building Department will have a significant role in the implementation activities that have been outlined in this Report. It is also anticipated that as these activities become institutionalized in the day-to-day activities of civic Departments, Planning and Building's role will become primarily one of providing information and acting as a broker between the community and civic Departments. In certain functions, however, such as
developing the Core Area Initiative, the Department will take a lead role in resolving the issues, and directing or assisting fund raising activities which will help pay for solving the problems these areas face. The ultimate goal is to continue improving an efficient, effective and comprehensive corporate approach to neighbourhood planning in Edmonton.
APPENDICES
I-VI Vn Vni IX X
-
District Planning Reports Neighbourhood Reports(ten examples) Neighbourhood Selection Report
-
A Proposal for a Capital City Core Area Initiative Products of the District Planning Program 1982 -1987
APPENDIX Vin â&#x20AC;˘ NEIGHBOURHOOD SELECTION REPORT 1.
Introduction
A neighbourhood selection process provides a vehicle for neighbourhood-based planning and public improvement programs. A decade has passed since the last comprehensive neighbourhoods analysis* compiled by the Planning and Building Department. This NeighbourhoodSelection Report is intended to:
(i)
set the stage for an ambitious urban revitalization effort in Edmonton, the Capital City Core Area Initiative; and
(ii) set out the broad criteria for the future selection of neighbourhoods where urban revitalization efforts are concentrated.
For the purposes of demonstrating this neighbourhood selection process, this report assesses the state of health and opportunities to be found in our inner city neighbourhoods. 2.
Assessment
Five major factors - people, community fabric, physical character, urban design and external pressures - can be used to assess the health of neighbourhoods. The criteria used to describe and define these factors are listed in Table 1 and are further detailed
in Appendix VTEKa). A preliminary evaluation was done for 62 neighbourhoods and four non-residential areas in the inner city. Four general classifications of the neighbourhoods - "neighbourhoods in need", "major opportunities", "emerging trouble" and "steady state" - were developed for the ranking and assessment system. Information for this assessment was obtained from field and telephone surveys, public meetings, background information and statistical data. All neighbourhoods and areas were evaluated according to the criteria identified in Table 1. A brief note is required to describe the limitations and assumpitions which are made in this assessment. An effort was made to evaluate all criteria without weighting, quantifiability or "scientific" approaches. Also, other civic Departments and the neighbourhoods themselves have not yet directly or actively participated in the
assessment. It is. for example, difficult to identify, quantify or weigh "community image", and then compare this criterion with the impacts of a "major roadway development". Furthermore, determining whether a criterion may have a positive or negative effect on the health of a neighbourhood can be difficult. Nevertheless, the criteria are intended to mean something to the residents of the neighbourhood and be used by the civic administration to address the broad physical and social priorities within a particular neighbourhood. In the future, it is hoped that this procedure can be further refined and applied to various neighbourhoods by the civic
administration, in consultation with community groups.
Older Neighbourhoods Report, Volumes I and H, 1977.
•wiShtawihood
ChAKiUmitci ol ♦ Mg*Hhyoi UnlMp^thy NgighUmihood A
efOPlE
•
VMy unhvillhy unluMlthir nainijl 1
COMMUMIIV FABRIC
C niTSlCAi (HARACIIK
O UMaAN UtiKiN
I
lAUKMAl FNIV<^UHIV
i
E
n«ulf«I/not
ipphCiWff
I
hc«tihjr vttyh««tthy
a s
33
r 8
I
I
e
if!
sS
35 o a
11
II
l»»i9hteMtfho(Mh inNM4
M«)OI 0|»pO«t4JAlt»«i
1roubl«
Vl««4|y )Ut«
TABLE 1
111
•f
C9
?S
c s
r
11 III
SS 8 * e J»
• f
L
*
o
II
f
r
o' ^ *
n
??:
1 rrqi neighbourhoods in need
2
MAJOR opportunities
5
NEIGHBOURHOOD CLASSIFICATIONS APPLIED cmr-wiDE
MAP 1
LOCATION
NEIGHBOURHOOD SELECTION CLASSIFICATIONS WITHIN PROPOSED CAPITAL CITY
CORE AREA INITIATIVE TARGET AREA MAP 2
UONTnOSEbwil
VltWQM-
eaTK«Not
VAILEY
•WO V«UJT m»Lrae*u
1 m
NEIQHBOURHOOOS IN NEED
a1^ MAJOR OPPORTUNITIES 3 r a EMERQINQ TROUBLE
APPENDIX VIII (a) â&#x20AC;˘ Neighbourhood Selection Derinltions Criteria and Definitions A.
PEOPLE
1.
Socio-economic/cultural
Low income;
High unemployment; Special needs population: high percentage of single-parent households.
high percentage of new immigrant groups. 2.
Demography Decline in population; Change in household type (i.e., increase in one adult households with children);
High percentage of senior citizens; Small percentage of school-aged children. 3.
Mobility
Short length of residence (i.e., a high percentage of population has lived in the house less than one year). 4.
Public Safety
High crime rate (perception of security appears to be lacking). B.
COMMUNITY FABRIC
5.
Community Image Identification, pride, perception ofoutsiders.
6.
Community Organization and Leadership Existence of resident/business/groups working to improve the neighbourhood.
7.
Social Services Network
Are existing social services in the neighbourhood meeting the needs of the resident population? 8.
Property Ownership
Renter/owner ratio. (It is assumed that a hi^h percentage of renters in a
low density neighbourhood is an indication of an unhealthy neighbourhood.)
C.
PHYSICAL CHARACTER
9.
Land Use Conflicts
Measurement of the effects ofconflict (i.e., noise, traffic, lack of privacy, property values, etc.) on a neighbourhood.
10.
Housing Conditions
High percentage of deteriorated housing. Note: the concentration of
deteriorated housing may be applicable to a part of a subject neighbourhood.
11.
Housing Rehabilitation
Evidence of widespread renovation: replacement of single detached housing with new single detached housing.
12.
Community Amenities and Services
The state of the following elements should be considered: parks, schools;
active community league; neighbourhood shopping/local services; churches.
13.
Environmental Disturbances
The following elements should be considered: traffic noise; parking; visual intrusion; odours; etc.
14.
Urban Infrastructure
Consider the state ofthe following elements: water;
drainage systems; road surfaces; sidewalks;
boulevard; lane lighting; lane paving.
urban DESIGN 15.
Architecture
Only those neighbourhoods which are affected by exemplary architecture or"eyesores" should be evaluated "high" or"low" in this category. 16.
Heritage
The manner in which a neighbourhood's heritage resources have been
managed should be assessed (i.e., if heritage buildings are being destroyed, an "unhealthy" rating should be assigned: conversely, if they
are being enhanced, a "healthy" rating is appropriate). 17.
Landscape and Streetscape
The quality of the public streetscape should be evaluated as with "Architecture" above. EXTERNAL PRESSURES
18.
Redevelopment Pressure
The extent to which pressure for land use changes is imminent and having an effect on the neighbourhood. 19.
Employment Areas in Transition The extent to which commercial, industrial and institutional areas are
changing (i.e., changing land use, deteriorating, expanding) and. as a consequence, creating the potential for conflicts with adjoining land uses. 20.
City-wide Pressures
The extent to which a city-wide facility (transportation, recreation, utility, institutional use) is affecting quality of life in a neighbourhood.
3.
Results
Table 2, entitled-Neighbourhood Selection Process, summarizes the results, classifies the neighbourhoods, and provides a model for priorizing the needs of any neighbourhood. The last is performed through ranking as "high", "medium" or "low" the priority for civic and community action. Map 1 shows those neighbourhoods or areas which have been classified through the neighbourhood selection process of Table 2.
Map 1shows there is some geographic dispersal ofneighbourhoods in need, although there is a general concentration of neighbourhoods in need and those with major opportunities around a core area on both sides of the North Saskatchewan River.
This is oneofthe general groundsfor developing a proposal for the Capital City Core Area Initiative which is described in Appendix IX. The area is shown on Map 2. This initiative is based on a successful precedent in the City of Winnipeg to focus public and private investment and programs on a major urban revitalization efibrt in a special core area.
Further development of this neighbourhood selection process by the civic administration, in consultation with community groups, holds out the future potential for:
(i)
identifying and initiating initiatives in other areas of the City; and
(ii)
dealing with the issues and concerns of neighbourhoods which are outside the boundaries of the proposed Core Area Initiative.
TABLE 2 NEIGH BOURti OOP SELECTION PROCESS NEIGHBOL-RHOOD SELECTION MAJOR FACTORS N'umberof
N'eiehbourr.oods-
Classiiication
Community
Physical
L'rban
External
Fabric
Character
Design
Pressures
H
H
H
L-M
H
H
L
H
H
H
L-M
M-H
MH
L-M
M-H
L
LM
LM
L
L
P»ople
Areas
.Neighbourhoods in Need .5
Major Opportunities
•.M
Emerging Trouble
25
Steady State
H • High priority M - Medium priority L - Low priority
Note; The 66neighbourhoods/areas were assessed according to thecriteria listed inTable I and Appendix VIIKa). Below are the neighbourhoods/areas in the first three ofthe four
classifications identified in the neighbourhood selection process. The remaining, "Steady State" neighbourhoods aregenerally healthy, inner city neighbourhoods. Neighbourhoods in Need
Major Opportunities
Emerging Trouble
Abbottsfield
Downtown CN Lands Downtown CP Lands Irvine Industrial
Alberta Avenue Allendale Belmont Bonnie Doon Britannia-
Balwin
Belvedere
Boyle Street C alder
Central McDougall Eastwood
King Edward Park McCauley Queen Mary Park Rossdale
Spruce Avenue
Municipal Airport Strathcona CPR Yards
Youngstown
Canon Ridge Canora Glenwood
High Park Inglewood Jasper Park Killarney McKernan Montrose Newton Parkallen
Parkdale
Prince Rupert Queen Alexandra Ritchie Riverdale Sherbrooke Sherwood Westmount
APPENDIX IX
A PROPOSAL FORA CAPITAL CITY
CORE AREA INITIATIVE
A Product of the District Planning Program Planning and Building Department November, 1987
PREAMBLE
The following Report outlines a proposal for beginning a Core Area Initiative for the
City ofEdmonton. This Capital City Core Area Initiative is basically an adaptation
ofa similar,successful program in the CityofWinnipeg. It would bring togetherthe three levels of government and the private sector in a major urban revitalization effort. Public and private investment would be directed toward the economic, social
and physical revitalization of the Downtown and surrounding core area. This Report briefly:
(1)
identifies the primary objectives and possible programs of a Core Area Initiative for Edmonton; and
(2)
outlines the basic administrative and implementation framework, and the first tasks necessary to begin a Core Area Initiative.
Map 1 identifies the area recommended for Edmonton's first Core Area Initiative. This should not preclude consideration of other areas for a similar Initiative in the
future, nor should all the programs identified in this proposal be limited to the
targeted Core Area Initiative area. The intent of a target area is to pool government
efforts to maximize the impact and effectiveness of mcreasingly scarce resources through centrally-planned and coordinated intervention.
CAPITAL CITY
LOCATION
CORE AREA INITIATIVE TARGET AREA MAP 1
eOUOMTQM UUMC9AL
WCSTWOOOtol
AAPcur
pAMCCRumr
POPULATION- 79,373 AREA- 12.86 sq. mL
79.28 km^
1.
Introduction
Comprehensive revitalization of the Downtown underway with both political commitment and the cooperation of private sector partners - PRogram to Improve Downtown Edmonton (P.R.I.D.E.). Complete revitalization and renewal of Rossdale and Cloverdale.
Infrastructure and streetscape upgrading in Oliver, Inglewood and Westmount.
Whyte Avenue Streetscape Improvements.
The Neighbourhood Park Development Program, a partnership program between the Parks and Recreation Department and communities who want to develop or upgrade parks.
The District Planning Program, an endeavour to bring equitable planning services and information to all of Edmonton's neighbourhoods.
All of the above describe neighbourhood improvement efforts. However, the current
ad hoc approach can not adequately address the critical issues now facing
Edmonton's older areas. These proCTams do not meet Edmonton's highest priority needs, but rather respond to the City s strongest and most vocal lobby groups.
The declineofthe inner city has been a persistent fact since the 1960's as population shifted to the suburbs. There is a need to arrest and reverse negative trends in the physical environment, housing, unemployment, infrastructure and community image. Yet ever since the end of the federally-sponsored Neighbourhood Improvement Program (N.I.P.) and Community Services Program (C.S.P.), Edmonton has not had an ongoing program specincally aimed at increasing the quality of Edmonton's older neighbourhoods.
ACapitalCity Core AreaInitiative (CCCAI) would fundamentally be an adaptation of Winnipeg's successful tri-governmental urban revitalization effort. Winnipeg's CAI, the only one of its kind in Canada, was recently renewed for a second, $100 million term. During its first term, Winnipeg's CAI directed over $500 million
ofinvestnient towards the economic, ^ial andphysical revitalization ofWinnipeg's declining inner city. Edmonton's socio-economic and political circumstances are not
so unique asto preclude the adaptation of the most usehil elements ofthe Winnipeg experience.
The purpose of this Report is:
(1)
to identify the primary objectives and possible programs of a Core Area Initiative for Edmonton; and
(2)
to outline the basic administrative and implementation framework and the first tasks for this initiative.
A preliminary Core Area Initiative area is shown on Map 1. This target area was
selected on the basis ofa preliminary assessment ofthe Area's need for 5ie programs of a Capital City Core Area Initiative.
2.
Capital City Core Area Initiative: Objectives and Programs
The Core Area Initiative in Winnipeg was used to unite many discrete programs across a policy spectrum of unprecedented breadth, including education, emplojrment and training, housing, neighbourhood improvement, community and cultural facilities and services, small business, industrial development, heritage
building recycling, community development, and large-scale, mixed-use commercial redevelopment. Figure 1 identifies three basic and overriding objectives which should be those of the CCCAI and provides a preliminary listing and description of
possible programs. It is intended that CCCATs objectives and pro^ams be reviewed
and revised further, as the administrative and implementation framework is
developed by the three levels of government in conjunction with the private sector. Public "seed" funding of various programs and projects is intended to raise additional, complementary funding from the private sector.
FIGURE 1
CAPITAL CITY CORE AREA INITIATIVE â&#x20AC;˘ PRIMARY OBJECTIVES AND
PROGRAMg A.
CIVIC ACTION
To arrest and reverse the decline in the physical environment, housing, infrastructure and community image (and thus in population) through improvement programs involving: community organization and development; review of land uses and land use controls;
reinforcement ofexisting community facilities and urban services; water, sewer and roadway improvement and replacement; small scale physical, aesthetic improvements (neighbourhood beautification);
promotion of the historical and cultural identity of a neighbourhood or area;
enforcement ofminimum propertyand maintenance standards; promotion of housing rehaoilitation; and actions to minimize negative land use, transportation, and other impacts such as school closures. PROGRAMS
1.
Area Revitalization - This program would implement items identified in existing statutory land use plans such as Area Redevelopment Plans.
2.
(Community Development - This program would assist local decision-maicing and action by community leaders and organizations through such bodies as advisory boards and local development corporations.
3.
CommunityImprovement - This program would facilitate the provision of community facilities and services, the coordination of public works and services for community improvement and the implementation of civic beautification projects. Coordination of projects would be undertaken under the community development program.
4.
Infrastructure and Streeteca^ UpCTading - This program would involve the continuation of A.M.P.L.E. (Alberta Municipal Partnership in Local Employment Program.)
B.
STIMUCATING economic GROWTH
To encourage new economic growth and employment opportunities in the core area by investing public money and other resources in selected key locations to stimulate, attract and concentrate private investment. PROGRAMS
1.
Downtown Development Corporation Projects - This program would support capital development of a Farmer s Market, (Concert Hall and
102Street Mall, as proposed by the Edmonton Downtown Development Corporation (EDDC).
2.
Railway Relocation and Redevelopment - This program would facilitate railway relocation and the redevelopment of the Downtown CN and CP
railway lands and of the Strathcona Yards, for major new housing and other uses.
3.
Core Area Housing - This program would coordinate and provide a variety of incentives to stimulate major new housing opportunities in such areas as the Downtown Warehouse District, transitional industrial lands, and the river valley communities.
4.
Neighbourhood Main Streets/Business Revitalization - This program would assist comprehensive strategies of parking improvements, business
promotion, municipal infrastructure and building facade upgrading, resolution of land use conflicts, and other measures required to revitalize commercial areas.
5.
Heritage - The program would actively promote the retention of our built
heritage through the adaptive re-use and recycling of many older buildings such as the Prince of Wales Armoury and the old R.C.M.P. Barracks.
6.
Small Business/Industrial Development^ousing Rehabilitation - This program would tap the entrepreneurial skills of local labour and business to create new emplojrment opportunities and to stimulate economic growth.
7. C.
Employment TrainingandEducation -This program would provide wage
subsidy and assistance in developing training programs for employers who employ individuals from the targeted population.
IMPROVING THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT
To reinforce and renew the social and cultural diversity in the inner city
through a wide-ranging program ofsocial action projects, multi- culturalism,
education, services for new immigrants and special populations, sports, entertainment, recreation and special events. PROGRAMS
1.
Multi-Culturalism - This program would enhance the cultural environment through festivals, multi-cultural celebrations and the creation ofnew performance facilities.
2.
Social Action Plans - This program would deal with the broad range of social and human needs, especially among disadvantaged and low income populations.
3.
Services to New IimniCTante -This program would focus on the language, education, job and other skills and services required by new residents, particularly immigrants from other cultures.
4,
Public S^etv - This program would address local community concerns
about police, fire and emergency services, and endeavour to more closely
match services with demands.
3.
Administration and Implementation Framework
The administrative and implementation framework of a Capital City Core Area
Initiative and the first steps in be^nning such an Initiative are outlined in this section. The following is an adMtation oftheWinnipeg example, with some changes to reflect Edmonton's context. For example, Edmonton no longer has a Commission
Board, rather a City Manager and an Executive Committee ofCouncil.
a)
Funding and Application ofMoney
Typically, each of the three levels of government would share an equal proportion (33.3%) of the funding. For Winnipeg, this involved tri-level
government funding of $100 million distributed through ten programs over an
initial term of five years. About 40% of the monies went towards social and
employment projects; the remainder were applied towards capital programs and physical improvements. The City ofWinnipeg has renewed its own Core Area Initiative for a second term and it appears that more money is being directed into capital projects.
b)
Organizational Structure
Figure 2 identifies the major functions and organizational structure of the
CCCAI. A description of the various components of the organizational structure follows:
Policy Committee - This Committee would be made up of the Mayor of Edmonton, the senior regional Federal Government Minister and the
Provincial Urban Affairs Minister. Major policy and budgetary decisions would be made by this Committee. Its Chairman would be the General Manager of the Core Area Office.
Management Group - This Group would be a senior management committee with deputy-level representation from each of the three levels of government. The City ofEdmonton would be represented by the City Manager. Operational direction would besupplied ^ this Group. Its Chairman would be the General Manager of the Core Area Office.
Core .^ea Office - The Core Area Office would serve as the primary delivery
vehicle for the Core Area Initiative. Its staff, drawn from government departments, would be responsible for directly delivering a substantial portion of the budget (e.g., 40% in Winnipeg). The Office would also coordinate the
balance of the program delivery done through the various line government departments andcommunity development corporations. The Core Area Office General Manager would come from eithergovernment or the private sector. (jovemment Line Departments - All three levels ofgovernment are involved in
program delivery. In Winnipeg, seventeen government departments are
involved in the Core AreaInitiative. The keyis to focus a single, highly visible and reasonably cohesive project identity. Both government and private business people have to be convinced that there is a sufficiently focussed
criticalmass ofactivity tojustify further complementary investment.
8
id
FIGURE 2 - CAPITAL OTY CORE AREA INITIATIVE FRAMEWORK
FUNaiON
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE
Major Policy and Operations Decision Malcing
Administrative
Community
Control
Control
POLICY COMMITTEE
Chairman
General Manager, CAO
MANAGEMENT
GROUP CORE
COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY
AREA
ADVISORY
DEVELOPMENT
OFFICE (CAO)
BOARDS
CORPORATIONS
VARIOUS GOVERNMENT LINE
DEPARTMENTS
Community Advisory Boards - Community Leagues, area councils and other similar organizations would play an advisory role in some program areas such as community improvement. There should be some cross-representation
between Community Advisory Boards and Community Development
Corporations.
Community Development Corporations - The devolution of spending control from government to the community would occur through the establishment of
Community Development Corporations. Each Corporation would have its own board of directors composed of local area merchants and residents. The Core
Area Office would negotiate with each Corporation the basic thrust of an allocated budget. The Corporation would be essentially left to administer its own projects. In Winnipeg, six Development Corporations have been provided with $12 million and have developed over forty community facilities and services projects in the inner city. The Edmonton Downtown Development Corporation represents the first model for future Community Development Corporations. c)
Private Sector Contributions
Private business people will put their money at risk, in terms of complementary investments in the Core Area, when there is a focussed and enduring public commitment. In Winnipeg, the CAI's "leverage" of complementary or "jsiggyback" private investment has been estimated to be
more than $500 million - or $5 of private investment for each dollar of public expenditure.
d)
First Steps Three basic first steps must be undertaken: 1.
CREATE THE VISION. This Report provides some direction. The
primary civic goals and priorities for the Capital City Core Area Initiative are, however, missing. These have to be strongly developed at both the political and administrative levels. 2.
SECURE LOCAL POLITICAL SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSAL AND ORGANIZE A STRONG LOBBY GROUP FROM LOCAL BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY LEADERS AND
ORGANIZATIONS. The Mayor, City Manager and other key local
politicians and senior government officials must be made responsible for carrying the proposal forward, within the civic administration and to all levels of government and to the community. There is support and expertise from a very successful existing source - the Winnipeg experience - which is still underway. 3.
MOBILIZE
THE
TECHNICAL.
FINANCIAL
AND
ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCES REQUIRED TO UNDERTAKE THE PROPOSAL. A major undertaking such as this will typically
involve some rudimentary early phases. For example, securing civic
departmental commitmentsand staffing resourcesas well as developing a
comprehensive marketing strategy should be undertaken in the early phase of program development.
10
APPENDIX X â&#x20AC;˘ Products of the District Planning Program 1982-1987 1.
Area Redevelopment Plans
Ten Area Redevelopment Plans (ARP's) have been prepared and approved since 1982. An ARP for the Northlands area is also under preparation. An ARP for part of the 114 Street LRT Corridor area may also be prepared. Refer to Map I for the locations of the Area Redevelopment Plan areas. i)
West Ingle The purpose of the West Ingle Area Redevelopment Plan was to maintain the low density residential and historical character of the
neighbourhood. The major objectives part of the Plan were to retain single detached housing in the southwest part of the Plan area, to allow
infill housing in the low densityarea, toestablish a heritage area to protect the historic homes in the area, and to propose traffic
management measures to prevent shortcutting. Some infill housing and housing improvements have been under taken and woonerfs have been instal ed to discourage shortcutting. ii)
Queen Mary Park
The purpose of the Queen Mary Park Area Redevelopment Plan was to establish certainty and direction for land use, and for necessary community and public improvements. The major objectives of the Plan were to maintain and provide for rehabilitation of single detached housing, to provide redevelopment guidelines for a more innovative, attractive and family-oriented built-fonn alternative to the traditional
walk-up apartment, to provide for commercial stripexpansion for low
intensity business uses, to promote a resolution to local traffic issues,
and to provide for ^en space development ofthe Municipal Airport
Clear Zone. A traffic management scheme and the development of the Municipal Airport Clear Zone for open space are currently being
implemented in Queen Mary Park. iii)
Montrose/Santa Rosa
The purpose of the Montrose/Santa Rosa Area Redevelopment Plan was to maintain the area as a stable, family-oriented, residential neighbourhood. The Plan addressed changes to tiie area due to its
p^ro^dmity to Northlands Coliseum, theColiseum LRT Station and Capilano Drive and due to the changing nature of the industrial activities in the area. Its major objectives were to rejuvenate the housing stock and to consolidate and define the function of the
commercial areas in the Plan area. There has not been any noticeable changes since redevelopment has not occurred, a reflection of the present economic situation. iv)
Coliseum Station
The purpose of the ColiseumStation Area Redevelopment Plan was to set out policies for orderly redevelopment around the Coliseum LRT
Station. The major objective of the Plan was to concentrate higher employment and residential densities around the Coliseum LRT
Station, taking advantage of the available transit service. A pattern of transitional densities and land use with related infrastructure
improvements between the LRTStation and the surrounding lower density community has been achieved. v)
Stadium Station
The purpose of the Stadium Station Area Redevelopment Plan was to set out policies for orderly redevelopment around the Stadium LRT Station. The major objectives of the Plan were to concentrate higher
employment and residential densities around the StadiumLRT Station, taking advantage of available transit service, and to provide guidelines for the preservation of the low density residential area. A pattern of transitional densities and land uses with related infrastructure
improvements between the LRT Station and the surrounding lower density community has been achieved. vi)
North Saskatchewan River Valley
The purpose of the North Saskatchewan River Valley Area Redevelopment Plan was to maintain the River Valley and Ravine System as a metropolitan recreational and environmental protection area. The major objectives of the Plan were to clearly define the
circumstances for acquisition ofprivate property, toensure the
rehabilitation of Rossdale and Cioverdale as residential communities in
the central River Valley, and to allow development of major facilities only subject to implementation of the recommendations of an environmental impact assessment. The Cioverdale and Rossdale Area
Redevelopment Plans have been approved, fulfilling some ofthe further
study requirements in the River Valley Plan. vii)
Cioverdale
The purposeof the Cioverdale Area RedevelopmentPlan was to retain the low density, village-like character of the community while
encouraging some new mediumdensity residential and commercial uses adjacent to 98 Avenue. This strategy included the disposal of City-owned residential land in the community. The major objectives of
the Plan were to provide primarily low density housing south of
98 Avenue and medium density CTound-related residential development on the south side ofand north of98 Avenue, to expand the CapitalCityRecreation Park trail system, and to retain GallagherPark. Implementation ofthe Plan is wellunderway. viii)
Rossdale
The purpose ofthe Rossdale AreaRedevelopment Pl^ wasto strengthen the future ofRossdale as a residential neighbourhood
through a strategy ofrevitalization and redevelopment. Thisstrategy
included the disposalofCity-owned residential land in the community. The majorobjectives ofthe Plan were to niaintain and provide for revitalization ofsingle detachedhousingin South Rossdale, to provide
for the redevelopment of North Rossdale with a mix of uses including
medium density residential, commercial and parks and recreation uses, and to manage traffic and parking. WestRossdale wasdesignated as a Special Study Area for further analysis. Implementation of the Plan is well underway. ix)
Parkdale
The purpose of the Parkdale Area Redevelopment Plan was to set out
policies for the orderly development ofthe portion ofthe neighbourhood in proximity to the Coliseum and StadiumLRT Stations. The major objectives of the Plan were to redistrict a substantial portionof the neighbourhood for medium to high density residential development near the LRT Stations, to propose substantial improvements and changes to the roadway network, and toacquire additional park space. Both the redistricting and roadway improvements have not occurred
and additional park space will not be realizedsince City Council deleted recommendations respecting the redevelopment levy. x)
Scona East
The purposeof the Scona East Area Redevelopment Plan was to create a residential environment that would both attract and keep families with children in the neighbourhood. The major objectives of the Plan were to protect and preserve the existing lowdensity residential areas
and tocreate additional opportunities for family-oriented housing in the neighbourhood. Both have been satisfied bydistricting. Aportion ofthe Plan area (Lavigne) has been deferred by Council pending
Provincial action allowing the placement of hazard warnings on land titles.
2.
Neighbourhood and Special Area Studies
Five Neighbourhood/Special Area Studies have been approved since 1982. A Planning Studyofthe 114 Street LRT Corridor area is currently underway. Refer to Map I for the location of the Study areas.
i)
Calgary Trail Land Use Study
The purpose ofthe Calgary Trail Land Use Study was to enhance the
image ofthe corridor as the southern entrance to the City andas a place
ofcommerce. The intent ofthe Study was to achieve a desirable
relationship between the transportation function ofthe roadway and land use development along thecorridor. This was dealt with through a proposed development concept for the corridor, detailed policy statements and proposed physical improvements. The development
conceptreconiized and established three zonesalong the corridor: a no
access/"free now** highway zone, a transitional urban highway zone, and an urbanarterial roadway zone. The more detailed policies onland use,transportation ^d urban design were site-specific and were
intended to be used inpreparing and assessing statutory plans,
redistricting applications anddevelopment proposals. AGateway Park and an urban landscaping program were proposed, street lighting was
to be extended from 23 Avenue to the City Limits, and changes to sign^ge were to be made. Gateway Park is constructed.
ii)
Britannia/Youngstown Neighbourhood Study
The purpose ofthe BritanniaA^oungstown Neighbourhood Study was firstly toaddress resident's concerns over redevelopment which had prompted a moratorium onzoning changes andsecondly tofulfill the
residents' request for a community plan. The intent ofthe Study was to permit low scale redevelopment in the southern part ofthe
neighbourhood while maintaining the status quo in the remainder of the neighbourhood. In addition, me future development ofthe North
Westlawn site and parks development were addressed. The Britannia/Youngstown Neighbourhood Study has created a sense of stability in terms of land use which has aided renewal in the neighbourhood.
iii)
Highlands Neighbourhood Study
The purposeof the Highlands Neighbourhood Study was to resolve land use and transportation issues for the community and to preserve the
unique architectural residences in the area. The intent ofthe Study
was to preserve single family residences, to preserve the historical character of the area, to correct K)ninginconsistencies, and to deal with traffic volumesand improve pedestrian safety on 112 Avenue. Todate,
the single family nature ofthe area has beenassured/protected and the
zoning inconsistencies dealt with.
iv)
100 Avenue Planning Study
The purposeofthe 100AvenuePlanning Study was to provide policies for the orderly development of 100 Avenue between 146 Street ar.d
170 Street and to lift the 1975 zoning freeze. The intent ofthe Study
was to give stability to single detached housing areas south of 100 Avenue and to provide the certainty required for renovation and redevelopment to take place, to provide guidelines for a smooth transition from residential to commercial use in areas north of
100 Avenue, and to provide guidelines for attractive landscy)ing along 100 Avenue which will become a major gateway to the CityCfentre.
v)
Gameau -109 Street Study
The purposeofthe Garneau -109 Street Study was to fulfill Policy 4.3b
ofthe Gameau Area Redevel^ment Plan which statedthat "adetailed
land use stU(W for 109 Street Cfommercial area be undertaken..." and outlined the Study terms of reference. The intent of the 109 Street Study was to reinforce and revitalize the role of 109 Street as a commercial district, to introduce pedestrian oriented activities, and to introduce residential development necessary to achieve the above.
These were to be achieved through the new policies for the 109 Street area which would allow development to occur two ways: firstly through existing zoning (CBl Low Intensity Business), secondly through redistricting applications (to direct control districts) of up to 50% higher density and an increase in height of from one to two storeys.
3.
Neighbourhood and [ndustrial Area Information Base (Fact Sheets)
In 1983, in an effort to facilitate planning research and study, all
neighbourhoods and industrialareas (developed, developing and proposed) in
Edmonton were defined in a standard manner. Also in the same year, a detailed land use survey and inventory were completed. This had not been
done since 1973. The Neighbourhood Fact Sheets, by compiling and presenting
this information, provided a standardized, concise package of land use and neighbourhood profile information (housing types, land area, length of residence, tenure, and population) by neighbourhood. Similarly, the Industrial Fact Sheets provided a standardized, concise package of land use and industrial
profile information (development, services available, and utility and protective services) by industrial area.
During the past four years the Neighbourhood and Industrial Fact Sheets have
been used extensively within the Planning and Building Department and the Civic Administration, by School Boards, Community Leagues, the real estate
industry, the development industry, business associations and the general
public. A very positive response to the Fact Sheets has been received.
The Fact Sheets are currently in the process of being updated and automated to include 1987 Civic Census results. 4.
Information and Community Consultation Services
Public participation is a key element in District Planning and has accounted for 20%of the time devoted to the Program. The neighbourhood is the basic
planning unit used. There are 182residential neighbourhoods and 61
industrial areas (developed and developing) in the City of Edmonton. The
District Planning Teams held public meetings with (Community Leagues in
their District. They briefly explained the DistrictPlanning Program and
development approval process, and identified issues. The citizens identified and
discussed issues and improvements in their neighbourhood with the planners. Thus, a rapport between the residents and the Planning and Building Department has been established. Informal contact between the citizens and
District Planners also occurs on an on-going basis though public inquiries. In
addition, meetingshave occurred withspecial planning groups, AreaCouncils and Business Associations todeal withissues and necessary improvements on a neighbourhood cluster basis (e.g., the South LRT extension from the
Universitycampusto the University ofAlberta Farm). At the City-wide level, networking has occurred with the Federation ofCommunity Leagues.
5.
Resident Satisfaction Survev
From February 1984 toJanuary 1985,4,159 residents participated in a City-wide telephone survey conducted by the Planningand Building
Department. Residents from everydeveloped neighbourhood in Edmonton larticipated in the survey, with balanced representation from Old
Neighbourhoods (pre-1951 construction). Mature Suburban Neighbourhoods constructed between 1951 and 1971), and Suburban Neighbourhoods (built
after 1971). The objectives of the survey were to find out residents' opinions on the current level ofservices provided by the City, ask people their opinions on
various aspects oftheir neighbourhoods (problems, issues, design, etc.). and get feedback on planning and transportation policies and proposals.
Six surveys were administered, one for each District. Approximately 80% of each of the District surveys were identical, dealing with issues ofCity-wide relevance. The remaining questionsdealt with local issues particular to each District. Prospective respondents were chosen by random sample. The telephone surveywas comprised ofmultiple choice, and pre-coded response questions. As well, residents were encouraged to provide non-empiricaland unsolicited information. The survey sample was desimed to provide reliable results for the three neighbourhood groups. At the neighbourhood group level, the response to most questions were within 5% of the responses that would be
obtained if all households were surveyed. The District level information had an even higher level of accuracy.
Some basic findings common to all Districts were:
a)
Most residents were satisfied with the level of municipal services provided and were willing to pay to maintain them.
b)
Residents felt that they have little influence on local planning and development decisions in their neighbourhood but would have liked to have more influence.
c)
There was support for the construction ofan Outer Ring Road. Also the residents felt that there should be better maintenance of existing roadways and less new roadway construction.
It is proposed that another survey be done in 1988 to update and to build on this 1984 survey.