WHY WE HAVE POSTED MATTERIALS AGAINST THE SIMPLE MINDED ZUBAIR ALI ZAI????

ALI MIRZA BELIEVES THAT WHEN SHAIKH AL BANI AND ZUBAIR ALI ZAI AGREE THAT A TRADITION IS SAHIH OR MUTVATIR THEN ONE WHO DISAGREE WITH THEM IS NOT A MUSLIM SINCE HE DENIES A MUTVATIR OR A SAHIH TRADITION. TGHAT IS THE REASON HE DECLARE IMAM IBN TAIMIAH AS KAFIR AT LEAST KAFIR IF HE DID NOT CHANGNED HIS VIEWS ASTAGHFARULLAH. SO WE HAVE PRESENTED SOME WORKS AGAINST ALI ZAI , TO PROVE THAT EVEN ALI ZAI COMMITTED MISTAKES AND ERRORS. IF IMAM IBN TAIMIAH REJECTS THE TRADITION MAN KUNTU MAULA THEN HE CANNOT BE ACCUSED AS KAFIR JUST BECAUSE ALI ZAI OR AL BANI OR BOTH ACCEPT IT AS MUTVATIR. PLEASE STUDY WORKS AGAINST ALI ZAI WITH CARE. SOME OF THE OBJECTIONS ARE CORRECT WHILE SOME ARE NOT. WE DO NOT SAY ALL OF THE OBJECTIONS ON ALI ZAI ARE CORRECT, YET WE REJECT MANY THING OF ALI ZAI. HE WAS A SEMI AHLUL HADITH, AND BELIEVED THAT SHAH ISMAIL IS EITHER A KAFIR OR BID"ATI OR BOTH ASTAGHFARULLAH. HOW EVER HE DID NOT SAID IT EXPLICITLY, HE ONLY DECLARED THE BELIEF IN YAKROZAH/YAKROZI AS HERETIC OR KUFR [ASTAGHFARULLAH].

SO WE HAVE SHEWN SOME OF THE WORKS AGAINST ALI ZAI , SOME OF WHICH DO CONTAIN CORRECT MATERIALS IN PARTS. SO PLEASE DO NOT MISUNDERSTAND US.