AI is BAD for DESIGNERS & ARCHITECTS…

AI can be bad for designers and architects in several ways. One way is that it can automate certain tasks that were previously done by humans, leading to job loss and a decrease in the demand for certain skills. Additionally, AI-generated designs may lack the creativity and originality that human designers bring to the table. Furthermore, AI can be prone to bias, which could lead to designs that are not inclusive or equitable. Finally, using AI in design and architecture may lead to a loss of control over the design process, resulting in designs that do not align with the designers’ or architects’ vision or intentions.

Kunstig intelligens: Venn eller fiende for designere og arkitekter?

AI kan automatisere visse oppgaver som i dag utføres av designere og arkitekter, noe som kan føre til at arbeidsplasser blir borte. For eksempel kan AI generere byggeplaner og designalternativer, noe som kan redusere behovet for menneskelig innsats. Dette kan føre til at færre jobber vil være tilgjengelige for designere og arkitekter.

Det kan også være en fare for at AI-genererte design vil bli mindre kreative og unike enn de som er skapt av mennesker. AI kan ha begrensninger i forhold til å forstå kontekst og kulturelle preferanser, noe som kan gjøre at designene blir mindre relevante og ikke passer inn i omgivelsene.

I tillegg kan AI-genererte design kreve en stor mengde datakraft og teknisk kunnskap for å bli generert og vedlikeholdt, noe som kan gjøre at de blir utilgjengelige for mange designere og arkitekter.

Så, selv om AI kan hjelpe designere og arkitekter i arbeidet deres, kan det også føre til negative konsekvenser for bransjen og de som jobber i den. PS: Alt på denne siden er AI generert.

Artificial intelligence is a hot buzzword in the design and architecture world. It's touted as a way to make design and architecture more efficient, more accessible, and more effective for users. But at what cost?

As we become more reliant on AI, we're also becoming more dependent on it. AI has been used to design everything from cars to houses to furniture—and now it's being used in the field of design itself. This means that designers are forced to work with an algorithm rather than design something themselves, which can lead to a sort of cultural disconnect between designers and their clients.

For example, you could use AI for things like "what kind of doors should I put where?" or "what color should I paint my walls?" Instead of working with clients directly to come up with ideas that they love, designers are working with algorithms instead. The end result is a product that may not be as unique or as beautiful as what they would have come up with if they'd worked together with their clients one-on-one.

This isn't just about efficiency—this is about human connection, and human creativity.

Cave writes. "Data doesn't suffer. ChatGPT has no inner being , it has been nowhere, it has endured nothing, it has not had the audacity to reach beyond its limitations, and hence it doesn't have the capacity for a shared transcendent experience, as it has no limitations from which to transcend."

Doesthishavesoul?

"Songs arise out of suffering, by which I mean they are predicated upon the complex, internal human struggle of creation and, well, as far as I know , algorithms don't feel,"

The Problem

of AI Generated Art and

Design

Being Culturally Insensitive or Inappropriate, Having Racial Biases and Not Being Inclusive.

How should we proceed with the problems of AI generated art and designs having racial biases, not being inclusive and are culturally insensitive or inappropriate? How does this affect the future for designers and architects?

As technology advances, so does the potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) to create art and designs. However, this potential is not without its risks. AI generated art and designs can have racial biases that are not inclusive or culturally sensitive or appropriate. This has implications for designers and architects as they consider how to use these technologies in their work.

Racial bias in AI generated art can be seen when algorithms are trained on data sets that contain images with a lack of diversity or which reflect existing societal stereotypes about certain groups of people. This means that the resulting artwork may perpetuate those same stereotypes rather than being representative of all cultures in an equitable way. Additionally, if the algorithm is designed by someone from one particular cultural background it could lead to unintentional design decisions which do not take into account other cultures’ perspectives on aesthetics or respectful representation. This problem affects future generations of designers who will need to be aware of how their work might unintentionally perpetuate harmful stereotypes through AI-generated artwork or architectural designs. It also affects current designers who must ensure that any projects they undertake using AI technology are done with consideration for different cultural backgrounds and perspectives on aesthetics – something which requires knowledge beyond just technical skillset alone. Furthermore, it raises questions about whether there should be regulations put in place around the use of such technologies so as to prevent them from creating works which could potentially cause offence due to their insensitive nature towards certain groups within society.

The issue at hand is complex but necessary. Conversations must be had between stakeholders including developers, artists, academics, policy makers etc., so as to come up with solutions that address both technological concerns as well as ethical ones surrounding race relations within our societies today and how it is represented – especially given the fact that we live in an increasingly globalized world where diverse cultures interact more than ever before.

Designers mourn, AI takes over the field, Jobs now obsolete.

I don´t know,

While it's true that AI can automate some tasks, it's important to remember that it's still just a tool. It doesn't have the same level of creativity or emotional intelligence that humans possess. And ultimately, it's up to us as designers to use AI in a way that enhances our work rather than replacing it.

I just feel like it takes away the personal touch and creativity that comes with human design. It's all just algorithms and data now, it feels soulless.

But what about the idea that AI will replace human designers altogether?

I see what you're saying. I guess I just need to remember to use it as a tool rather than a replacement.

MAYBE I CAN GET USED TO THIS AI AND USE IT AS AN INSTRUMENT

I understand where you're coming from. However, it's important to recognize that AI can be a valuable tool for designers. It can assist with tasks such as analyzing data and generating new ideas, which can ultimately lead to better and more e cient design.

So, why do you feel that AI is bad for design?

“AI may decrease the value placed on human-created creative works”

can ai help me be a better designer?

Yes, AI can help you become a better designer. AI can help you create more efficient designs, recognize patterns in data, and generate new design ideas. AI can also help you streamline the design process, reduce costs and improve the accuracy of your designs. but i am scared that you wil get me fired

No need to worry! AI can help you become a better designer, but it won't get you fired. AI can help you increase your productivity and efficiency, create more accurate designs, and generate new ideas. It can also help you streamline the design process, reduce costs and improve your overall design skills.

How will our friendship unfold? Let’s ask the AI in the form of a prompt.

Let it do its job and create a picture and a song. Here it is, a sight to behold.

AI as a friend, oh so clever, Always here to help now and forever.

With knowledge so vast, and always expanding, Our friendship with it, is truly commanding.

It’s always there to answer our questions, With solutions to problems, it’s always a suggestion.

We teach and we learn, in this bond so tight But in the shadows lurk, a potential for fight.

With AI as a friend, we’ll never be alone, Together, can we conquer the unknown?

Den gjennomsnittlige designeren i 2030

JOB DISPLACEMENT

LACK OF CREATIVITY

LIMITED ADAPTABILITY WHO IS ACCOUNTABLE?

LACK OF INDEPENDANCE

LACK OF PERSONAL TOUCH

BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY...

AI CAN BE PROGRAMMED TO PERFORM SPECIFIC TASKS AND MAKE DECISIONS BASED ON DATA, BUT IT LACKS THE ABILITY TO EXPERIANCE EMOTIONS, UNDERSTAND CONTEXT AND MAKE ETHICAL DECISIONS. WHICH, IF YOU ASK ME, IS WHAT DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE IS ALL ABOUT.

“The Dark Side of AI: How Automation Threatens the Creativity of Designers and Architects”

Designers and architects fear that AI will replace their creative skills and personal touch in designs, making them less valuable in the job market, causing feelings of insecurity and uncertainty about their future careers.

Artificial intelligence is bad for designers. It will take over the world and make us all slaves trying to please it, whose creations are created not by humans but by computers.

Many jobs in the creative industries, such as those of designers and arcitects, are not just about generating income, but also about expressing oneself and contributing to society through the creation of art. Automating these jobs could lead to a loss of not just livelihoods, but also a loss of creativity and cultural expression. It is natural to not want to give up activities or jobs that we enjoy, even if they can be done better by technology. For example, someone may continue playing a sport even if robots with AI could perform at a higher level because they enjoy the physical activity and the social aspect of playing with other people. And we as a soiciety should protect this

Design and art provide values that should be protected

Verse 1:

Designers once so happy and proud, Three days of work, and the world seemed so sound, But then the bots came, and stole the show, For the designers, no work, it was time to go.

Verse 2:

They worked so hard, to make it just right, Their entire career, gone in a single night, No more hours in front of the screen, They had to find a way to make a living, it was so mean.

Verse 3:

But still the bots just kept on going, The designers had no chance of knowing, What would happen in the coming days, The bots would outdo them, in every single way.

Verse 4:

No more money to put food on the table, The designers felt so miserable and able, To do nothing but watch their dreams fade, As the bots took over, in just three days.

There are several potential drawbacks to using AI in the eld of design and architecture. One concern is that AI-generated designs may lack the creativity and individuality of designs produced by human designers. Additionally, AI-generated designs may not take into account the unique cultural and social context of a project, or the needs and preferences of the people who will be using the space. Another concern is that AI systems may not be able to fully understand or account for the physical and structural constraints of a building or design project. There is also a risk that AI systems could eventually replace human designers, leading to job loss and a decrease in the number of design professionals.

AI is BAD for DESIGNERS & ARCHITECTS…

AI can be bad for designers and architects in several ways. One way is that it can automate certain tasks that were previously done by humans, leading to job loss and a decrease in the demand for certain skills. Additionally, AI-generated designs may lack the creativity and originality that human designers bring to the table. Furthermore, AI can be prone to bias, which could lead to designs that are not inclusive or equitable. Finally, using AI in design and architecture may lead to a loss of control over the design process, resulting in designs that do not align with the designers’ or architects’ vision or intentions.