Prostacyclin Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: New Directions Mardi Gomberg-Maitland, M.D., M.Sc.1 and Ioana R. Preston, M.D.2
ABSTRACT
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by vasoconstriction and smooth muscle cell proliferation of the pulmonary arterioles, as well as in situ thrombosis of the small pulmonary arteries. Prostacyclin is involved in PAH vascular remodeling. It is unclear if decreased prostacyclin in the lungs is a cause or a consequence of PAH, but the relative lack of prostacyclin and its positive effects on the pulmonary vascular bed support the theory that long-term prostacyclin replacement is effective. Current therapies based on evidence-based medicine include epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, and beraprost, each with limitations based on the drugs’ inherent properties and administration route. Treatment of PAH by inhibiting multiple pathways concurrently may produce additive benefit. Because prostacyclin therapy is not curative and does not normalize pulmonary hemodynamics in the majority of cases, combining a prostacyclin with other PAH agents may be a promising approach. KEYWORDS: Pulmonary arterial hypertension, prostacyclin, combination therapies
Objectives: Upon completion of this article, the reader will: (1) understand the molecular basis for prostacyclin use in pulmonary arterial hypertension; (2) have learned the current data in support of prostacyclin therapy; (3) understand the differences among prostacyclin analogs; and (4) have learned about novel approaches to therapy. Accreditation: The University of Michigan is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to sponsor continuing medical education for physicians. Credits: The University of Michigan designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1 category 1 credit toward the AMA Physician’s Recognition Award.
P
ulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) comprises a spectrum of diseases characterized by elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure above 25 mm Hg at rest, or 30 mm Hg with exercise. PAH is characterized by vasoconstriction and smooth muscle cell proliferation of the pulmonary arterioles, a process known as vascular remodeling, as well as in situ thrombosis of the small pulmonary arteries.
PULMONARY VASCULATURE Normally, the smooth muscle layer of the pulmonary vessels is maintained in a state of relaxation. This is achieved through the release of pulmonary vasodilators that counterbalance the effects of pulmonary vasoconstrictors. The presence of vascular remodeling seen in PAH suggests that there is a dysfunction that shifts the balance toward factors that
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; Editor in Chief, Joseph P. Lynch, III, M.D.; Guest Editor, Victor F. Tapson, M.D. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, volume 26, number 4, 2005. Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Mardi Gomberg-Maitland, M.D., M.Sc., Division of Cardiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2016, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail: mgomberg@medicine. bsd.uchicago.edu. 1Division of Cardiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois; 2Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Division, Tufts– New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Copyright # 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel: +1(212) 584-4662. 1069-3424,p;2005,26,04,394,401,ftx,en;srm00391x.
394
PROSTACYCLIN THERAPY FOR PAH/GOMBERG-MAITLAND, PRESTON
produce vasoconstriction and smooth muscle cell proliferation. Lung tissue is normally active in the synthesis, metabolism, and release of several prostaglandins, some of which play a role in regulation of the pulmonary vascular resistance. Among these, prostacyclin (PGI2) has vasodilatory effects on the pulmonary vasculature, whereas thromboxane is a potent pulmonary vasoconstrictor and stimulus for platelet aggregation. Pulmonary endothelial cells have an abundance of prostacyclin synthase (PGI2 synthase), the enzyme that produces prostacyclin. Prostacyclin acts as a local hormone. It is released by endothelial cells and produces relaxation of the underlying vascular smooth muscle and prevents platelet aggregation. (Fig. 1) Prostacyclin is involved in PAH vascular remodeling. In two experimental forms of PAH, overexpression of PGI2 synthase in lungs of either rats exposed to monocrotaline or mice exposed to hypoxia protects from the development of PAH.1,2 In addition, loss of expression of PGI2 synthase has been reported in remodeled pulmonary vessels from patients with PAH.3 It is unclear if decreased prostacyclin in the lungs is a cause or a consequence of PAH, but abnormal prostacyclin levels may play a part in the development and maintenance of PAH. In support of an active role of prostacyclin on vascular remodeling is its antiproliferative effect on smooth muscle cells in vitro.4 The pathogenesis of PAH is an imbalance between prostacyclin and thromboxane. Excess vasoconstrictors may play a role in medial hypertrophy in PAH. Patients with severe PAH have decreased urinary excretion of the prostacyclin metabolite, 6-keto PG2a, evidence of decreased prostacyclin production, whereas 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (a stable metabolite of thromboxane A2) is increased.5 Another important pathological feature of PAH is the widespread development of in situ thrombosis of the small pulmonary arteries with intraluminal thrombin deposition. Interaction of growth factors and platelets with dysfunctional endothelial cells creates a procoagu-
Figure 1 Effects of prostacyclin as a pulmonary antihypertensive agent.
lant environment within the pulmonary vascular bed. The release of vasoconstrictors, such as serotonin and thromboxane is associated with platelet activation and thrombosis. This is seen by a prolonged fibrinogen half-life and diminished fibrinolytic activity.6 Besides its potent vasodilator activity, prostacyclin has been shown to have antithrombotic and antiplatelet effects both in vitro7,8 and in vivo.9 Effects of prostacyclin on pulmonary vasculature are presented in Fig. 1. In addition to vasodilatory, antiplatelet and antiremodeling effects, prostacyclin probably has a direct inotropic effect on the heart. Acute and long-term vasodilator studies with intravenous epoprostenol, subcutaneous treprostinil, and the inhaled form of prostacyclin, iloprost, demonstrated not only a decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressures but an enhancement in cardiac output.10–12 The acute effect is possibly due to an increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) on cardiomyocytes, resulting in a direct positive inotropic effect. The long-term improvement in cardiac output is not well understood but may be due to the antiremodeling effect of prostacyclin on the pulmonary vasculature, with improvement in blood flow through the pulmonary vessels and enhanced preload of the left ventricle.11 Epoprostenol, treprostinil, and iloprost are the prostacyclin analogues approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of PAH, whereas oral beraprost is still investigational. Analogues may have different properties because of binding properties of the prostacyclin receptors. Treprostinil is more potent than iloprost or beraprost on inhibition of human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells proliferation in vitro.13 There have been no clinical trials comparing one prostacyclin analogue to another, and therefore differences in efficacy remain to be proven. In conclusion, based on the pathophysiology, the relative lack of prostacyclin seen in PAH and its positive effects on the pulmonary vascular bed support the theory that long-term prostacyclin replacement is effective therapy. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of different prostacyclin analogues available for clinical use.
INTRAVENOUS PROSTACYCLIN (EPOPROSTENOL) The first and most proven therapy approved for PAH is intravenous prostacyclin (epoprostenol). Epoprostenol cannot be administered orally because it is not stable at pH < 10.5 and has a half-life of no more than 6 minutes, obligating continuous intravenous therapy.14 Testing with continuous therapy in laboratory animals with elevated pulmonary pressures from pulmonary vasoconstrictors led to the initial justification for human trials.15,16 Early individual experience and small-scale
395
396
SEMINARS IN RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE/VOLUME 26, NUMBER 4
Table 1
2005
Prostacyclin Analogues Available for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Name
Route
Half-Life
Advantages
Disadvantages
FDA Approved
Epoprostenol
IV
6 minutes
Easy to titrate
Requires permanent
Yes
Longest experience
Flolan
intravenous catheter Risk of line infection Risk of syncope or cardiovascular collapse with infusion interruption Need for ice packs Mixing every 24 hours
Treprostinil
SC
4.6 hours
Smaller pump (Minimed)
Pain at the site of infusion
Yes
Risks associated with the
Yes
No mixing required
Remodulin
Change site every 3–4 days IV
4.4 hours
No need for intravenous catheter Cassette changed every 48 hours No need for ice packs
presence of a permanent
Theoretically, less risk of
intravenous catheter
cardiovascular collapse in case of accidental interruption Iloprost
Inhaled
Ventavis
6.5–9.4 minutes postinhalation
IV
23 minute
No need for intravenous catheter
6–9 inhalations a day
Local delivery limits side effects
More risk of syncope
(headache, jaw pain) Same as epoprostenol, but less
Same as epoprostenol
No
Gastrointestinal intolerance
No
Yes
experience Beraprost
oral
35–40 minutes
Oral delivery
Unclear efficacy
registries 17–20 demonstrated improvement in symptoms and hemodynamics. Investigators began testing vasodilatory reserve with therapy during heart catheterization. It was unclear if lack of acute change in hemodynamics (drop in pulmonary artery pressure, improvement in cardiac output) determined overall response to therapy. Baseline measurements and measurements after acute administration demonstrated benefits in lowering pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. However, subjects lacking an acute hemodynamic response to vasodilatory testing still appeared to benefit from longterm treatment.21
Vasodilatory Testing Several vasodilators are currently used to assess pulmonary vasoreactivity in subjects with PAH. Adenosine, an intermediary product of adenosine triphosphate, acts on the endothelial cell and vascular smooth muscle A2 receptors causing vasodilation. This increases cAMP, inducing smooth muscle relaxation. Adenosine’s short half-life, less than 5 seconds, allows for safe and easy administration. It is infused at a dose of 50 mg/kg/min and titrated upward every 2 minutes until discomfort (flushing, chest discomfort, dyspnea) or a dose of 250 mg/kg/min. Adenosine response predicts chronic
effects of intravenous prostacyclin and oral calcium channel blockers.22 Epoprostenol may also be used to assess acute pulmonary vasoreactivity because it has a short half-life; however, side effects of headache, flushing, nausea, and emesis persist longer and testing requires more time.23 It is administered at 2 ng/kg/min and uptitrated every 15 to 30 minutes. Nitric oxide (NO) inhalation results in selective pulmonary vascular effects without effects on the systemic circulation.24 It is given at 20 to 40 ppm (parts per million) concurrently with 100% oxygen by face mask. Inhalation requires a skilled technician and is an expensive agent for acute testing. Ricciardi et al compared nifedipine and NO testing and demonstrated a similar response.25 However, it is recommended to choose one agent for testing because multiple testing can lead to interpretative error.
Clinical Trials The design of the first prospective, randomized, openlabel placebo trial of epoprostenol in addition to conventional therapy (warfarin, digoxin, oxygen, and oral vasodilators) was the pivotal trial in PAH treatment.26 Eighty-one subjects with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV, were enrolled for
PROSTACYCLIN THERAPY FOR PAH/GOMBERG-MAITLAND, PRESTON
12 weeks. Subjects on active therapy had improvement in exercise capacity as the mean 6 minute walk test improved by 32 m compared with a decrease of 15 m in the conventional therapy group (p < .003). Hemodynamic improvement was evidenced by a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure of 8% in the epoprostenol group versus an increase of 3% in the conventional group (difference in mean change 6.7 mm Hg, 95% CI ¼ 10.7 to 2.6 mm Hg; p < .002). The mean pulmonary vascular resistance decreased by 21% in the epoprostenol group versus an increase of 9% in the conventional group (difference in means 4.9 mm Hg/L/min, CI ¼ 7.6 to 2.3 mm Hg/L/min, p < .001). Eight patients died during the 12-week trial, all in the conventional therapy group (p ¼ .003). With the FDA approval of epoprostenol, it is unethical to conduct a long-term, randomized placebo trial of epoprostenol. However, cohort analyses in Europe and in the United States have provided convincing evidence of its long-term benefits. In France, after 1 year of therapy 162 subjects had improvement in clinical function with modest hemodynamic improvement.27 In the United States, 178 subjects had improved survival compared with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) registry used as a historical control.28 The survival rate at 1 year was 85 versus 58%, 2 years 70 versus 43%, 3 years 63 versus 33%, and at 5 years 55 versus 28%, p < .001). Prognostic factors included a clinical history of right heart failure, functional class, and hemodynamic parameters such as right atrial pressure and cardiac index. The impact of epoprostenol therapy on survival in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) patients is presented in Table 2. Evidence now supports epoprostenol use in PAH from associated etiologies. A multicenter randomized study demonstrated improved exercise capacity in scleroderma PAH subjects.29 Subjects with scleroderma treated with epoprostenol appear to have a worse prognosis than subjects with PPH in uncontrolled analyses.30,31 Similar improvements in exercise functional
capacity and functional class have been seen in subjects with congenital left to right cardiac shunts,32 portal hypertension,33,34 and infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).35,36 Over the past decade, increasing use of epoprostenol has delayed and obviated the use of lung transplantation in subjects with severe disease. A U.S. survey indicated that treatment with epoprostenol allowed two thirds of subjects to deactivate from the transplant list.36a However, it is unclear how long the disease will remain stable and therefore frequent follow-up with examination, exercise, and hemodynamics is recommended.37–39
Limitations of Therapy Epoprostenol is usually well tolerated in most subjects. Side effects are minimal and include flushing, headache, nausea, loose stool, jaw discomfort with ‘‘first bite,’’ and foot pain with prolonged standing or walking. 26–28 Long-term administration requires a permanent central venous catheter and a portable infusion pump.26 Medication needs to be prepared daily. The complex delivery system requires education of sterile technique, operation of the pump, and care of the catheter. A strong support system, a ‘‘partner,’’ is often strongly recommended to obviate problems if the subject is too ill or unable to prepare medication on a given day. Medication needs to be kept cold, requiring ice packs to be worn, with medication in 24 hour cassettes. Serious complications include infection and thrombosis of the catheter and temporary interruption of the infusion because of iatrogenic ‘‘switching’’ or pump malfunction31 The incidence of catheter-related sepsis ranges from 0.l to 0.6 case per patient-year.27,31
TREPROSTINIL (SUBCUTANEOUS/ INTRAVENOUS) Treprostinil is a tricyclic benzidene prostacyclin analogue that shares pharmacological actions similar to
Table 2 Studies Using a Combination of a Prostacyclin Analogue with Another Agent for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Trial
No. of Patients
Time
Results
Epoprostenol þ bosentan
Humbert et al, 2004 (RCT 2:1).51
33
16 weeks
No difference in clinical
Iloprost or beraprost þ bosentan
Hoeper et al, 2003 (open label)52
20
3 months
Improvement in exercise capacity and maximal
Iloprost þ sildenafil
Ghofrani et al, 2003 (open label)54
73
9–12 months
Improved exercise capacity
Epoprostenol þ sildenafil
Stiebellehner et al, 2003 (open label)55
5 months
Improved exercise capacity
outcome or hemodynamics
oxygen consumption and hemodynamics 3
and hemodynamics RCT, randomized controlled trial.
397
398
SEMINARS IN RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE/VOLUME 26, NUMBER 4
epoprostenol, including antiproliferative activity on human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells.13 Treprostinil differs from epoprostenol in that it is chemically stable at room temperature and neutral pH and has a longer half-life (3–4 hours).40 The improved stability of this compound and its solubility at physiological pH enables subcutaneous delivery, thereby avoiding the potential complications of the epoprostenol intravenous delivery system. The bioavailability of treprostinil is excellent, as demonstrated on healthy volunteers.40 Subcutaneous treprostinil was approved in 2002 for the treatment of NYHA class II–IV PAH patients. A 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial that enrolled patients with idiopathic PAH, PAH related to congenital heart defects, or connective tissue disease, compared treprostinil to placebo in a total of 470 patients.41 Treprostinil improved symptoms of pulmonary hypertension and quality of life. Class IV patients and patients receiving higher doses of treprostinil had a more significant improvement. At 12 weeks, there was also an improvement in hemodynamic parameters, including right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac output. In subset analyses from the subcutaneous trials, patients who had PAH related to connective tissue disease had improvement in exercise capacity, symptoms of PAH, and hemodynamics.10 Subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil does not require daily mixing and preparation of the infusion. The infusion site is changed every 3 to 4 days, the drug comes in a premixed syringe, and there is no need for ice packs or intravenous catheter care. The most common side effect is pain at the site of infusion, which usually responds to a combination of local anesthetic solutions, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, gabapentins, or low dose narcotics. The pain appears not to be dose related, and it is unclear why the pain occurs and which patients will develop severe pain. Most recently, the FDA approved the use of intravenous treprostinil based on bioequivalence to subcutaneous therapy.42 The advantage over epoprostenol is that the cassette is changed every other day and it does not require ice packs. The longer half-life of intravenous treprostinil, 4.4 hours, may also decrease the risk of cardiovascular collapse in case of inadvertent interruption of the infusion. Investigational trials with intravenous therapy are in progress.
ILOPROST (INHALED) A targeted approach, with direct inhalation of prostacyclin, allows for more selective pulmonary effects. Iloprost is a chemically stable prostacyclin analogue that can be delivered by inhaler/nebulizer.43 To ensure alveolar deposition, the delivery system produces small aerosol-
2005
ized particles (median diameter of 0.5–3.0 mm).44 However, because of its short duration of action, it must be inhaled 6 to 12 times a day.43,45 Iloprost is an effective agent in PAH subjects with significant limitation in functional capacity. Two hundred and seven subjects with PPH, PAH associated with connective tissue diseases, or inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension with NYHA Class III or IV functional class enrolled in a 12-week multicenter, placebo-controlled trial.45 The efficacy end point was a 10% increase in subjects’ scores on a 6-minute walk test and improvement in NYHA functional class. Seventeen percent of patients on iloprost reached this end point compared with 4% in the placebo group (p ¼ .007). The mean increase in 6-minute walk test was 36.5 m (p ¼ .004) and 58.8 m among subjects with PPH. Subjects’ well-being improved as evidenced by quality of life scores and the Mahler dyspnea index. Hemodynamic measures at 12 weeks also improved in the treatment group compared with baseline values (p < .001) and subjects on placebo had significant declines in values. Side effects consisted of symptoms related to systemic vasodilation. More syncopal episodes occurred in the iloprost group although they were not associated with clinical deterioration. Iloprost is safe and effective and is approved in Europe awaiting U.S. trial data. Intravenous iloprost is also approved in Europe for PAH patients. Intravenous iloprost has similar acute hemodynamic changes to inhaled iloprost,46,47 but the inhaled therapy is more pulmonary selective.46,47 Because intravenous therapy has similar limitations to epoprostenol in that it requires a permanent catheter and routine sterile mixing procedures, inhaled therapy is more attractive. It is unclear if the two therapies will have similar long-term efficacy.
BERAPROST (ORAL) Difficulties with prostacyclin administration led to the development of an oral biologically stable prostacyclin analogue, beraprost sodium. Beraprost is absorbed rapidly after the administration of an oral dose under fasting conditions; it reaches a peak concentration after 30 minutes and has an elimination half-life of 35 to 40 minutes.48 In Europe, 130 NYHA Class II and IIII subjects enrolled in a 12 week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of beraprost.48 Subjects had PAH caused by idiopathic PAH, connective tissue diseases, congenital left to right shunts, portal hypertension, and HIV. At a median dose of 80 mg/4 times daily, subjects had a mean increase of 25 m on 6-minute walk testing (p ¼ .04). Subjects with PPH had a mean increase of 46 m (p ¼ .04) whereas PAH from other causes had no significant improvement. In the United States, a similar trial was designed but with a 12-month study
PROSTACYCLIN THERAPY FOR PAH/GOMBERG-MAITLAND, PRESTON
duration. This study demonstrated improved 6-minute walk distance at 3 and 6 months compared with the placebo group that was not sustained at 9 and 12 months.49 Beraprost is not approved in the United States but is an approved therapy in Japan.
COMBINATION THERAPY Treatment of PAH by inhibiting multiple pathways concurrently may produce additive benefit. Because prostacyclin therapy is neither curative nor does it normalize pulmonary hemodynamics in the majority of cases, investigators have examined combining a prostacyclin with agents that act on the endothelin pathway and agents that increase cyclic guanosine phosphate (cGMP). Bosentan, an orally active nonselective endothelin receptor antagonist is currently the only FDA approved medication for PAH.50 Thirty-three subjects with PAH were started on epoprostenol with uptitration for 16 weeks and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to bosentan (62.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks and then 125 mg twice daily) or placebo.51 There was a trend, but no significant benefit in clinical or hemodynamic measurements. Hoeper et al52 studied 20 patients with IPAH that were on either inhaled iloprost or oral beraprost. Three-month therapy with bosentan added to the prostacyclin resulted in improvement in exercise capacity and maximal oxygen consumption. Therefore, it is unclear whether treatment with a stable dose of prostacyclin can be improved with the addition of bosentan. A newer strategy is to increase cGMP in the smooth muscle cell, and, by reducing intracellular calcium, to produce vasodilatation. This is accomplished by inhibition of the phosphodiesterase 5 enzyme (PDE-5), which degrades cGMP in the vascular smooth muscle cell. The pulmonary vasculature has a higher concentration of the PDE-5 enzyme than most vascular beds. Sildenafil, a PDE-5 enzyme inhibitor, in combination with prostacyclin, may be better than either agent alone. Sildenafil in combination with beraprost limited progression of PAH and improved survival in the monocrotaline rat model.53 Oral sildenafil in combination with iloprost in 73 PAH patients over 9 to 12 months follow-up improved exercise capacity and hemodynamics.54 Patients in this study demonstrated a decline in 6-minute walk test on iloprost prior to enrollment. Open, uncontrolled experience adding sildenafil to epoprostenol also improved hemodynamics.55 A large placebo-controlled multicenter trial is currently in progress. Addition of oral sildenafil may be used as a bridge to intravenous therapy but it is unknown if this delay will affect the vasculature’s ability to respond to intravenous medications in the future. Table 2 summarizes the results from combination therapies.
CONCLUSION Prostacyclin therapies are effective treatments of PAH. New analogues are more convenient and have an improved safety profile, although their administration requires either continuous infusion (treprostinil), or frequent inhalations (iloprost). Long-term data of efficacy are not available yet, but should parallel epoprostenol. Although data on combination therapies consist of small open-label trials, initial data are promising.
REFERENCES 1. Geraci MW, Gao B, Shepherd DC, et al. Pulmonary prostacyclin synthase overexpression in transgenic mice protects against development of hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. J Clin Invest 1999;103:1509–1515 2. Nagaya N, Yokoyama C, Kyotani S, et al. Gene transfer of human prostacyclin synthase ameliorates monocrotalineinduced pulmonary hypertension in rats. Circulation 2000; 102:2005–2010 3. Tuder R, Cool C, Geraci M, et al. Prostacyclin synthase expression is decreased in lungs from patients with severe pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:1925–1932 4. Zucker TP, Bonisch D, Hasse A, Grosser T, Weber AA, Schror K. Tolerance development to antimitogenic actions of prostacyclin but not of prostaglandin E1 in coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol 1998;345:213– 220 5. Christman B, McPherson C, Newman J, et al. An imbalance between the excretion of thromboxane and prostacyclin metabolites in pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 1992;327:70–75 6. Welsh C, Hassell K, Badesch D, Kressin D, Marlar R. Coagulation and fibrinolytic profiles in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension. Chest 1996;110:710–717 7. Moncada S, Vane JR. Prostacyclin: homeostatic regulator or biological curiosity? Clin Sci (Lond) 1981;61:369–372 8. Miyamori I, Morise T, Yasuhara S, Takeda Y, Koshida H, Takeda R. Single-blind study of epoprostenol and 6-ketoprostaglandin E1 in man: effects of platelet aggregation and plasma renin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1985;20:681–683 9. Cheng Y, Austin SC, Rocca B, et al. Role of prostacyclin in the cardiovascular response to thromboxane A2. Science 2002;296:539–541 10. Oudiz RJ, Schilz RJ, Barst RJ, et al. Treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease. Chest 2004;126: 420–427 11. McLaughlin V, Genthner D, Panella M, Rich S. Reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance with long-term epoprostenol (prostacyclin) therapy in primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 1998;338:273–277 12. Blumberg F, Riegger G, Pfeifer M. Hemodynamic effects of aerosolized iloprost in pulmonary hypertension at rest and during exercise. Chest 2002;121:1566–1571 13. Clapp L, Finney P, Turcato S, Tran S, Rubin L, Tinker A. Differential effects of stable prostacyclin analogs on smooth muscle proliferation and cyclic AMP generation in human pulmonary artery. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002;26:194– 201
399
400
SEMINARS IN RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE/VOLUME 26, NUMBER 4
14. Data JL, Molony BA, Meinzinger MM, Gorman RR. Intravenous infusion of prostacyclin sodium in man: clinical effects and influence on platelet adenosine diphosphate sensitivity and adenosine 30 :50 -cyclic monophosphate levels. Circulation 1981;64:4–12 15. Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ. Pulmonary vasodilator activity of prostacyclin (PGI2) in the cat. Circ Res 1979;45:404–409 16. Starling MB, Neutze JM, Elliott RL. Control of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in neonatal swine with prostacyclin (PGI2). Prostaglandins Med 1979;3:105–117 17. Weir EK, Rubin LJ, Ayres SM, et al. The acute administration of vasodilators in primary pulmonary hypertension: experience from the National Institutes of Health Registry on Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;140:1623–1630 18. Rubin LJ, Groves BM, Reeves JT, Frosolono M, Handel F, Cato AE. Prostacyclin-induced acute pulmonary vasodilation in primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 1982; 66:334–338 19. Reeves JT, Groves BM, Turkevich D. The case for treatment of selected patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;134:342–346 20. Higenbottam T, Wheeldon D, Wells F, Wallwork J. Longterm treatment of primary pulmonary hypertension with continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin). Lancet 1984;1:1046–1047 21. Rubin L, Mendoza J, Hood M, et al. Treatment of primary pulmonary hypertension with continuous intravenous prostacyclin (epoprostenol). Ann Intern Med 1990;112:485– 491 22. Nootens M, Schrader B, Kaufman E, et al. Comparative acute effects of adenosine and prostacyclin in primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 1995;107:54 23. Raffy O, Azarian R, Brenot F, et al. Clinical significance of the pulmonary vasodilator response during short-term infusion of prostacyclin in primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 1996;93:484 24. Krasuski R, Warner J, Wang A, Harrison J, Tapson V, Bashore T. Inhaled nitric oxide selectively dilates pulmonary vasculature in adult patients with pulmonary hypertension, irrespective of etiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2204– 2211 25. Ricciardi M, Knight B, Martinez F, Rubenfire M. Inhaled nitric oxide in primary pulmonary hypertension: a safe and effective agent for predicting response to nifedipine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1068–1073 26. Barst R, Rubin L, Long W, et al. A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 1996;334:296–301 27. Sitbon O, Humbert M, Nunes H, et al. Long-term intravenous epoprostenol infusion in primary pulmonary hypertension: prognostic factors and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:780–788 28. McLaughlin VV, Shillington A, Rich S. Survival in primary pulmonary hypertension: the impact of epoprostenol therapy. Circulation 2002;106:1477–1482 29. Badesch D, Tapson V, McGoon M, et al. Continuous intravenous epoprostenol for pulmonary hypertension due to the scleroderma spectrum of disease. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:425–434 30. Kuhn K, Byrne D, Arbogast PG, et al. Outcome in 91 consecutive patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
36a.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
2005
receiving epoprostenol. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167:580–586 Humbert M, Sanchez O, Fartoukh M, et al. Short-term and long-term epoprostenol (prostacyclin) therapy in pulmonary hypertension secondary to connective tissue diseases: results of a pilot study. Eur Respir J 1999;13: 1351–1356 Rosenzweig E, Kerstein D, Barst R. Long-term prostacyclin for pulmonary hypertension with associated congenital heart defects. Circulation 1999;99:1858–1865 Tan HP, Markowitz JS, Montgomery RA, et al. Liver transplantation in patients with severe portopulmonary hypertension treated with preoperative chronic intravenous epoprostenol. Liver Transpl 2001;7:745–749 Plotkin JS, Kuo PC, Rubin LJ, et al. Successful use of chronic epoprostenol as a bridge to liver transplantation in severe portopulmonary hypertension. Transplantation 1998; 65:457–459 Nunes H, Humbert M, Sitbon O, et al. Prognositc factors for survival in human immunodeficiency virus–associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1433–1439 Aguilar R, Farber H. Epoprostenol (prostacyclin) therapy in HIV-associated pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1846–1850 Robbins IM, Christman BW, Newman JH, et al. A survey of diagnostic practices and the use of epoprostenal in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 1998;114: 1269–1275 Rubin LJ. Diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004;126(Suppl 1):4S–6S Rubin LJ. Diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004;126(Suppl 1):7S–10S Badesch DB, Abman SH, Ahearn GS, et al. Medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004;126(Suppl 1):35S– 62S Wade M, Baker FJ, Roscigno R, DellaMaestra W, Hunt TL, Lai AA. Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of treprostinil sodium administered by acute subcutaneous infusion. J Clin Pharmacol 2004;44:83–88 Simonneau G, Barst RJ, Galie N, et al. Continuous subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:800–804 Laliberte K, Arneson C, Jeffs R, Hunt T, Wade M. Pharmacokinetics and steady-state bioequivalence of treprostinil sodium (Remodulin) administered by the intravenous and subcutaneous route to normal volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2004;44:209–214 Hoeper M, Schwarze M, Ehlerding S, et al. Long-term treatment of primary pulmonary hypertension with aerosolized iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1866–1870 Gessler T, Schmehl T, Hoeper MM, et al. Ultrasonic versus jet nebulization of iloprost in severe pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2001;17:14–19 Olschewski H, Simonneau G, Galie N, et al. Inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002;347: 322–329
PROSTACYCLIN THERAPY FOR PAH/GOMBERG-MAITLAND, PRESTON
46. Hallioglu O, Dilber E, Celiker A. Comparison of acute hemodynamic effects of aerosolized and intravenous iloprost in secondary pulmonary hypertension in children with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:1007–1009 47. Opitz CF, Wensel R, Bettmann M, et al. Assessment of the vasodilator response in primary pulmonary hypertension: comparing prostacyclin and iloprost administered by either infusion or inhalation. Eur Heart J 2003;24:356–365 48. Galie N, Humbert M, Vachiery J-L, et al. Effects of beraprost sodium, an oral prostacyclin analogue, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39: 1496–1502 49. Barst R, McGoon M, McLaughlin V, et al. Beraprost therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:2119–2125 50. Rubin L, Badesch D, Barst R, et al. Bosentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002;346: 896–903
51. Humbert M, Barst RJ, Robbins IM, et al. Combination of bosentan with epoprostenol in pulmonary arterial hypertension: BREATHE-2. Eur Respir J 2004;24:353–359 52. Hoeper MM, Taha N, Bekjarova A, Gatzke R, Spiekerkoetter E. Bosentan treatment in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension receiving nonparenteral prostanoids. Eur Respir J 2003;22:330–334 53. Itoh T, Nagaya N, Fujii T, et al. A combination of oral sildenafil and beraprost ameliorates pulmonary hypertension in rats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169: 34–38 54. Ghofrani HA, Rose F, Schermuly RT, et al. Oral sildenafil as long-term adjunct therapy to inhaled iloprost in severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:158–164 55. Stiebellehner L, Petkov V, Vonbank K, et al. Long-term treatment with oral sildenafil in addition to continuous IV epoprostenol in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2003;123:1293–1295
401