BBC iD
News
Sport
Weather
iPlayer
TV
Radio
More‌
POLITICS Home
World
UK England N. Ireland Scotland Wales Business Politics Health
Education Sci/Environment Technology Entertainment & Arts
26 May 2013 Last updated at 23:33
Top Stories Tenth arrest in Woolwich murder case
Blue Labour: Would Ed Miliband shrink the welfare state? By Alex Campbell
Wave of Baghdad car bombs 'kills 57'
BBC News
Crystal Palace 1-0 Watford (aet) EU ponders easing Syria arms embargo Dad's Army star Pertwee dies aged 86
Features Gift of freedom How a son saved to post his mother's bail after 19 years
Soccer speak 'In the six' and football's other strange Americanisms
Wish you were here? Why Koreans spend their bank holidays in traffic jams
Musical sleuth The tireless detective work behind rock album reissues
Welfare reform has become one of the most divisive issues in austerity Britain. Now, a rising force within the Labour Party wants to silence the party's critics and win the welfare debate - by abandoning some of its oldest principles. Its adherents want to scale back the state's role in welfare, reward with extra support people who have "paid in" more than others, and even take away universal benefits. They are not a right-wing think tank, they are Blue Labour. And they are closer than ever to the very heart of the Labour Party. The Blue Labour movement says power and wealth should be handed to communities, with local organisations replacing the centralised welfare state. The argument represents a dramatic rethink of what many consider the party's greatest achievement - the creation of the welfare state in 1945 using ideas usually associated with its political adversaries. And the movement, once downplayed as a right-leaning "family, faith and flag" outfit responding to concerns about immigration, is growing in influence. Leading voices such as Marc Stears and Jon Cruddas are in charge of crafting Ed Miliband's speeches and writing policies for the next election manifesto. The shift is nowhere more evident than in the deprived London borough of Newham, where long-standing Labour Mayor Sir Robin Wales has overseen moves to fast-track people in employment on to the housing waiting list.
Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net
Find out more
Related Stories Benefit changes: Who will be affected? Welfare reforms fair Duncan Smith Q&A: Disability benefits and you
Most Popular Shared Dad's Army star Bill Pertwee dies aged 86 India jail-born man bails mother after 19 years Stroke stem-cell trial shows promise Saudi drivers in 'sidewalk skiing' craze Germany to test anti-graffiti drones
Read Cheese-rolling warnings ignored Everton fans protest over new badge Tiger 'dragged' zoo worker into pen Tenth arrest in Woolwich murder case Dad's Army star Bill Pertwee dies aged 86 Police searchers find woman's body Man discovered on fire in garden
Page 1 / 4
"It's not acceptable that generations of people live on welfare - it is not good for them, it is not right and it is not fair, and we have allowed that to happen," he says. The idea of rewarding those who "pay in" first is not new, even on the political left. It was included in the 1942 report by William Beveridge that became the blueprint for the welfare state.
Shops given 'lads' mags' warning Mukul Devichand asks whether the Labour Party is abandoning the state, for BBC Radio 4's Analysis programme. Listen at 20:30 BST on Monday 27 May or afterwards on the BBC iPlayer
Dog death man's family 'heartbroken' Fresh Baghdad explosions 'kill 10'
Analysis
Video/Audio The five toys you 'won't see again'
But its rebirth as possible Labour policy blurs the boundaries of a stormy welfare debate increasingly oversimplified as "strivers and skivers". Labour's new blue clique believes the welfare state has contributed to the downfall of communities - blamed for so long on inequality and the collapse of industry - by allowing people to think it is acceptable to just take.
Cheese rolling attracts thousands Jail-born boy frees mum after 19 years Riding the world's tallest swing ride Gamestick console set for launch
Outspoken academic and Labour peer Lord Maurice Glasman, a close friend of Jon Cruddas, advocates removing absolute entitlement to welfare in favour of rewards based on contributions - both financially and socially.
Saudi drivers in 'sidewalk skiing' craze Heritage steam under coal threat
"It's absolutely correct that people who have paid in over the lifetime should be treated better than people who haven't paid in," he says.
BBC News Channel Low prices draw Chinese to UK
"But we have to be more generous in thinking about what contributes giving.
Bill Pertwee 'life and soul of the party'
"People who look after their parents, people who care for their children, that is to be conceptualised as 'putting in'." Bringing people together to solve each other's problems while shrinking an expensive, bureaucratic welfare state and inviting voluntary organisations to run it - what differences, if any, separate these ideas from the ones behind David Cameron's Big Society?
Lord Glasman says welfare is undermining communities
"The Big Society only sees a problem with the state, it sees no problem with the market," Lord Glasman says. "Our position says both the state and the market represent centralising, administrative, concentrating forces that can dominate you and the only way to resist that is through relational power." Jon Cruddas has spoken of the public's "lost trust in our welfare state". Marc Stears has described the party's true roots as being separate from a bureaucratic state - "a movement located in particular parts of the country which has always taken local solutions extremely seriously".
The rise of food banks has been linked to welfare cuts and unemployment
It is unlikely that even Blue Labour would encourage shrinking the welfare state with, for example, an under-occupancy tax, but coalition measures such as localising the Social Fund - including the axing of crisis loans - could be closer to its thinking. They are reacting in part to a changing tide in which the "welfare party" tag - once a badge of honour - was used by David Cameron as a putdown during Prime Minister's Questions.
Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net
Page 2 / 4
Among Labour voters, attitudes to welfare have hardened too. According to figures from the Joseph Rowntree foundation, half of its supporters now believe benefit cuts would help claimants to live more independently. Critics on the political left, including Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee, believe Labour should concentrate on refocusing the welfare argument rather than moving its position. "The Conservative government has played a blinder," she says.
Clement Attlee
"About the only thing they've done really, really well is undermining any faith in the benefit system... persuading people that almost everybody on benefits is a scrounger and only hardworking people count." Exactly how much Blue Labour thinking will become Labour policy remains to be seen. In 1945, Prime Minister Clement Attlee hailed the nascent welfare state as a new Jerusalem a reference to the William Blake poem. Jeremy Cliffe, of the Economist, believes today's Labour Party may struggle to persuade its rank and file its future lies in a new new Jerusalem. "It's a challenge to the Labour Party, this thinking, because it involves thinking very differently about the role of the state," he says.
Served as deputy to Prime Minister Winston Churchill in the war cabinet before winning the first post-War general election for Labour, in 1945 His government introduced the National Health Service and welfare state, nationalised one fifth of the British economy, and granted independence to India Won the 1950 general election with a much-
reduced majority before losing power to Churchill "The Attlee government, Labour's perhaps most a year later venerated and mythologised government, set in place a welfare state which involved the benevolent state pulling levers, transferring wealth from those that had it to those that didn't, and this involves moving on quite dramatically from that."
Toynbee is not convinced the concept can move beyond the drawing board - but said its presence could not be ignored. "Labour MPs know very well that you can't take money away from the very weakest and very poorest and they won't let it happen," she said. "I'm pretty confident that this will end up being a creative policy with a lot of good ideas, that it will spark all sorts of things off, but don't let's imagine it's a new 1945 settlement." Listen to Analysis on BBC Radio 4 at 20:30 BST on Monday 27 May or afterwards on the BBC iPlayer.
More on This Story Related Stories Benefit changes: Who will be affected? 29 APRIL 2013, UK Welfare reforms fair - Duncan Smith 02 APRIL 2013, UK Q&A: Disability benefits and you 08 APRIL 2013, BUSINESS
Share this page
More Politics stories Data bill 'pact' to defeat Lib Dems Labour and the Conservatives could unite to push through the controversial Communications Bill despite Lib Dem objections, a former Tory leader says. Thousands risk radicalisation -
Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net
New laws to protect park home
Page 3 / 4
May
owners
Services Mobile
About BBC News Connected TV
News feeds
Alerts
E-mail news
Mobile site
BBC © 2013 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net
Editors' blog BBC College of Journalism News sources Editorial Guidelines Terms of Use Privacy Cookies Parental Guidance
About the BBC BBC Help Accessibility Help Contact Us
Page 4 / 4