Saint Paul Grand Round Design and Implementation Plan by Alta Planning + Design

C ity

S aint P aul

G rand R ound D esign & I mplementation P lan

D ecember 2016

A cknowledgements C ity

S aint P aul

Christopher Coleman, Mayor Dai Thao, Councilmember Ward 1 Rebecca Noecker, Councilmember Ward 2 Chris Tolbert, Councilmember Ward 3 Russ Stark (Council President), Councilmember Ward 4 Amy Brendmoen, Councilmember Ward 5 Dan Bostrom, Councilmember Ward 6 Jane L. Prince, Councilmember Ward 7 Dave Thune, Past Councilmember Ward 2 Bill Finney, Past Councilmember Ward 7

G rand R ound C ore M anagement T eam Kathleen Anglo, Project Manager, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation, Design Anton Jerve, 8 80 Initiative Lead, City of Saint Paul Planning & Economic Dev., Planning Reuben Collins, Bike/Pedestrians, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Planning Kevin Nelson, Construction Lead, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Street Design

P olicy A dvisory C ommit tee Mike Hahm, Director, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation Jody Martinez, Design Manager, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation Kathleen Anglo, Project Manager, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation Jonathan Sage-Martinson, Director, City of Saint Paul Planning & Economic Development Donna Drummond, Planning Manager, City of Saint Paul Planning & Economic Development Anton Jerve, Planning Staff, City of Saint Paul Planning & Economic Development Kathy Lantry, Director, City of Saint Paul Public Works John Maczko, City Engineer City of Saint Paul Public Works Dan Haak, Street Design Manager, City of Saint Paul Public Works Paul St. Martin, Traffic Engineer, City of Saint Paul Public Works Paul Kurtz, Planning Manager, City of Saint Paul Public Works Kevin Nelson, Construction Lead, City of Saint Paul Public Works Reuben Collins, Bike & Pedestrians, City of Saint Paul Public Works Anne Hunt, Sustainability, Staff, City of Saint Paul Public Works

T echnical A dvisory C ommit tee

C ommunity A dvisory C ommit tee

Kathleen Anglo, Project Manager, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation, Design Zach Jorgenson, City Forester, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation, Forestry Karin Misiewicz, Maintenance, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation, Operations Stacy Gillings, Events along the route, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation, Special Events Don Varney, City of Saint Paul Parks & Recreation, Design Anton Jerve, 8 80 Initiative Lead, City of Saint Paul Planning & Economic Development Nora Riemenschneider, 8 80 Initiative Coordinator, City of Saint Paul Planning & Economic Development Amy Spong, Historic Preservation Commission, City of Saint Paul Planning & Economic Development Anthony Nikula, Police/Events, City of Saint Paul Police Tina McNamara, Police/Events, City of Saint Paul Police Reuben Collins, Bike/Pedestrians, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Planning Kevin Nelson, Construction Lead, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Street Design Pat Murphy, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Sewers Sonja Piper, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Traffic, Lighting & Signals Amanda Lovelee, Public Art, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Public Art Marcus Young, Public Art, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Public Art Regina Flanagan, Public Art, City of Saint Paul Public Art Ordinance Program Glenn Pagel, City of Saint Paul Public Works, Bridges Wes Saunders-Pierce, Water Resources Coordinator, City of Saint Paul Safety & Inspections Mark Doneux, Administrator, Capitol Region Watershed District Anna Eleria, Administrator, Capitol Region Watershed District Paige Ahlborg, Project Manager, Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District Tina Carstens, Administrator, Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District Joe Lux, Ramsey County Public Works

Bridget Ales Brian Alton Richare Arey Joseph Bloedoorn Deborah Camasta Dan Choma Betsy Christensen Shirley Erstad Seamus Flynn

Jeanne Gehrman Soyini Guyton Michael Kuchta Brian Longley John Marshall Jeff McMenimen Philip Moody Elliott Nickell Drew Ross

Amy Schwarz Emma Struss Terri Thao, Co-Chair Nesret Shu-Ankah Theba Erik Tolzman Andy Trcka, Co-Chair Susan Von Mosch Roi Ward Stephanie Weir

C onsultant T eam S.E.H., INC. Wayne Houle, Project Manager Mike Kraemer, Project Principal Mike Horn, Landscape Architect

Gregg Calpino, Project Landscape Architect Heather Kienitz, Senior Traffic Engineer

ALTA PLANNING & DESIGN Steve Durrant, Principal Landscape Architect Kim Voros, Active Transportation Analysis Fred Young, Senior Landscape Architect JONES & JONES ARCHITECTS + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Duane Dietz, Senior Landscape Architect Ivan Heitmann, Landscape Designer Laura Enman, Landscape Designer Barbara Witt, Graphic Designer COMMUNITY DESIGN GROUP Antonio Rosell Juana Sandoval MYKLEBUST + SEARS Andrea Myklebust Stanton Sears LANDSCAPE RESEARCH Carole Zellie Amy Lucus LITTLE Ian Davies

Curt Baker

STEVENS ENGINEERING Angela Popenhagen

Sierra Sanders

A N ote

from the

M ayor Since Saint Paul was founded more than 150 years ago, our parks and parkways have served as special spaces for recreation, contemplation and relaxation for our residents and visitors. More than 2 million people visit Saint Paul every year to experience our parks and our neighborhoods. But we know that there are better ways to ensure our green spaces are more accessible, connected and welcoming. Fifteen years ago, the Grand Round Master Plan was created to resurrect an idea first discussed in the late 1880s – a path encircling Saint Paul that would connect neighborhoods to parks. The southern portion along the Mississippi River was completed long ago, but the idea to finish the northern 13 miles of the Grand Round has lain dormant until now.

Photo: National Park Service

Promoting projects which create vibrant places and spaces is a top priority as we work to connect people of all ages, backgrounds and abilities with city amenities. These efforts – including the Grand Round – will promote economic development and attract people to Saint Paul for generations to come.

As is true with all community projects, it takes collaboration to realize a vision which benefits many. Our partners, including the Community Advisory Committee and members of the public, have thoughtfully crafted an exceptional set of design guidelines for the Grand Round. I am thankful for their hard work, and I appreciate the City Council’s support as they recognize this project’s importance to the future of Saint Paul. Thank you for providing your comments, ideas and vision for the Grand Round. Your passion and support for Saint Paul are what make this city the unique, vibrant community it is. Sincerely,

Mayor Chris Coleman

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

Table 1|

C o n t e n ts

I ntroduction

G rand R ound P lan R ecommendations

Origins of the Plan

60 Overview

Vision of the Grand Round

Pelham Boulevard

Johnson Parkway

Guiding Principles

61 64

106 108 110 112 114 118

P lanning P rocess 03

Planning Process

Community Engagement

D evelopment of the G rand R ound P arkway S ystem , 1872-1965 Development of the Saint Paul Parkway System

11 Recommendations

D esign G uidelines 12 Overview 13

Identity and Branding

Green Infrastructure

34 Placemaking 56

G rand R ound P lan R ecommendations

Wayfinding

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Mississippi River Boulevard to West Beverly Road West Beverly Road to Myrtle Avenue

Raymond Avenue 67 70 72

Myrtle Avenue to Long Avenue Long Avenue to Energy Park Driveâ&#x20AC;&#x160; Energy Park Drive to Como Avenue

Como Avenue 73 Raymond Avenue to Inter Campus Transit Way 76 Inter Campus Transit Way to Underwood Street 78 Underwood Street to Pascal Street 80 Pascal Street to Midway Parkway

Lake Phalen to Phalen Boulevard Phalen Boulevard to East 7th Street East 7th Street to Margaret Street Margaret Street to Euclid Street Euclid Street to Burns Streetâ&#x20AC;&#x160; Placemaking and Wayfinding Maps & Matrix

I mplementation 126

Cost Estimate, Phasing and Segment Map

Horton Avenue 82

Midway Parkway to Gateway Drive

Nagasaki Road 84

West Como Boulevard to Como Boulevard

Wheelock Parkway 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104

Avon Street to Kent Street Kent Street to Western Avenue Western Avenue to Marion Street Marion Street to Trout Brook Trail Trout Brook Trail to I-35 I-35 to Gateway Trail Gateway Trail to Edgerton Street Payne Avenue to Arcade Street Arcade Street to Lake Phalen at Lake Phalen

All photos courtesy of the SEH Design team unless otherwise noted.

1 | Introduction Origins of this Planning Process

Vibrant Places and Spaces This effort is funded in part by the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 8 80 Vitality Initiative to promote economic development through investments that enliven the public realm by connecting residents and visitors with the city, promoting walking and bicycling, and creating great public spaces. The results will attract residents, employees, businesses and visitors to Saint Paul for years to come. The initiative is inspired by the work of 8 80 Cities, which promotes livable cities where an eight-year-old and eighty-year-old would feel safe, invigorated, and welcomed by their surroundings. The 8 80 Vitality Initiative includes the implementation of the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s $42.5 million 8 80 Vitality Fund, an investment focused on significant improvements in infrastructure and public spaces.

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

1 | I n t r o d u c t i o n

Original Vision for the Grand Round

2016 Vision

As Saint Paul’s population increases, the Grand Round will increasingly become a key component connecting neighbors to neighbors as well as people to nature. Population growth and extension of light rail service also necessitates the need for safe and functional connections that will serve residents of all ages. With the constant expansion of the city’s bike and trail network comes an opportunity to deliver a quality recreation experience that provides the community with opportunities to easily visit all Saint Paul’s attractive urban public spaces as well as the green nature of the City’s parks, lakes, and Mississippi River.

The Saint Paul Grand Round connects people to parks, nature, neighborhoods and businesses with scenic parkway facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists.

This vision was first imagined by renowned landscape architect H.W.S. Cleveland in 1872 and further implemented in the early 20th century by Park Superintendent Frederick Nussbaumer. Planning for the parkways waned until a Master Plan was completed in 2000.

1872 Park System Outline Plan for City of Saint Paul by H.W. S. Cleveland

Horace Cleveland photo: minneapolisparkhistory.com

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

The Master Plan built on the parkway system and started laying the groundwork to complete an approximately 26-mile recreational greenway that connects Lakes Como and Phalen to the Mississippi River and the open spaces in between. This route, refined by the Saint Paul Bicycle Plan approved in 2015, serves as the basis for this design manual. This document presents the continued development and refinement of those plans. The implementation of the Grand Round will assist in enhancing the urban forest and improve transportation within Saint Paul. Saint Paul community members, through a series of workshops and outreach opportunities, identified a vision and four guiding principles to assist the design team in developing the desired character of the Grand Round.

Saint Paul Grand Round Master Plan, 2000

Guiding Principles Guiding Principles define the key criteria for making design decisions. The four principles, noted below, provided the Grand Round Design Team with the basis to test and confirm that the designs, practices, products, and materials listed within this Manual meet the these principles. The Guiding Principles for the Grand Round are: •

Promote health, safety, and comfort of all users

•

Create a key visual element and recreation feature that places high value on neighborhoods, history, and the natural environment

•

Maximize sustainable practices

•

Designed as a contiguous system of public open space that improves quality of life and strengthens our economy

2 | P lanning P rocess How We Got to This Point The following documents highlight various planning efforts started in 2000 that are currently relevant to the development of the Grand Round Design and Implementation Plan. These plans, studies, policies, and guidelines contain the basis for this effort. The latest versions of each of these reports should be consulted during the design and implementation of Grand Round.

PLANS, STUDIES, POLICIES, AND GUIDELINES

Saint Paul Grand Round Master Plan, 2000

Friendly Streets Initiative: DPIZFSI Collaboration Report, 2013

Friendly Streets Initiative: Pelham Boulevard Parking Study, 2014

Friendly Streets Initiative: Raymond Station Area, 2015

Saint Paul Street and Park Tree Master Plan, 2010

Grand Round Cultural Resources, 2000

Saint Paul Parks & Recreation Plan, 2010

Saint Paul DRAFT Complete Street Design Manual, 2015

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

2 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030; Planning Process

PLANS, STUDIES, POLICIES, AND GUIDELINES

Saint Paul Historic Preservation, 2010

Saint Paul Historic Context Study, 2011

Saint Paul Public Art Ordinance Program Guidelines, 2012

Saint Paul Parks and Recreation System Plan, 2010

Saint Paul Transportation Plan, 2010

Saint Paul Public Art Ordinance Technical Manual, 2014

Saint Paul Landmark Trees, 2012

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Saint Paul Neighborhood Bike Rack Program, 2014

Saint Paul Bicycle Plan, 2015

Raymond Station Area Plan, 2008

Great River Passage Master Plan, 2013

Saint Paul Urban Tree Atlas, 2011

Planning Process | 2

Community Engagement Importance of community engagement Saint Paul is home to a great diversity of ethnic and cultural communities and to populations experiencing a variety of socioeconomic conditions. These communities and populations are often underrepresented in planning processes. The project team made proactive efforts to expand opportunities for members of underrepresented communities to contribute meaningfully to the planning process. These efforts contribute to a project that better serves the needs of a wider range of Saint Paul populations and improves active living outcomes.

TAKE THE MEETING TO THE PEOPLE One of the keys for building public engagement was to make it easier and more convenient for more people to participate. The project team took engagement to places where people were already congregating, setting up workshops at community events and popular destinations. This made it easier for community members to provide their comments and guidance without having to attend a separate meeting. The City of Saint Paul and the design team reached out and engaged the public using many different tools and approaches. Seventeen neighborhood outreach sessions and three multi-day workshops, conducted in the Spring and Summer 2015, included: •

Pop-Up events along the Grand Round route

•

Listening sessions with community organizations

•

Engagement events held in coordination with larger community events

•

Presentations at District Council meetings

•

Design Workshop open houses and meetings

•

Online engagement including comments and an online survey

•

Open House meetings

•

Hosting and convening the Community Advisory Committee made up of citizen representatives

USER-FRIENDLY MATERIALS The Grand Round project will shape Saint Paul residents’ connections to and enjoyment of their city for generations to come. To guide the project to respond to residents’ needs and aspirations we developed welcoming, user-friendly, jargon-free project materials. The materials were oriented to residents who may not be familiar with city planning processes and projects. The appendix provides an in-depth description of the community engagement process.

Comments on desired amenities were the most prevalent, with nearly one third of comments recommending additional amenities along the route, such as water fountains, restrooms and benches. More than a quarter of the responses received focused on infrastructure recommendations, such as better crossing treatments and improved bicycle facilities with the most attention focused on facilities separated from motor vehicles. Participants recommended implementing either off-street trails, buffered bicycle lanes, or separated bicycle lanes and indicated a slight preference for buffered bicycle lanes. Safety was a key concern for many participants, as well as improving connections to existing trails and adding wayfinding options, such as maps, mile markers and technology-based route-finding tools.

THEME TRENDS We categorized comments received during Pop-Up and Listening Sessions to better identify and group similar recommendations. The majority of comments fell into one of four categories: •

Amenities

•

Infrastructure recommendations

•

Connections

•

Wayfinding or safety

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

2 | Planning Process

Community Engagement What We’ve Learned The summary below was refined through in-person Pop-Up and Listening Session engagement opportunities.

•

Support for the plan was prevalent

•

Users of the Grand Round route include both pedestrians and bicyclists. The needs of each user group must be considered

•

Participants expressed a preference for facilities separated from motor vehicles.

•

Safety was a key concern for many participants

•

Amenities such as restrooms, water fountains, and benches are desired

•

Consistent walk/bike facilities throughout the route are strongly desired. Where possible the same kind of facility should be provided for long stretches of the route

•

Several intersections and/or roadways were identified as challenging for pedestrians and bicyclists

•

Connections and better wayfinding to existing trails are desired

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Planning Process | 2

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

3 | D evelopment

of the

S aint P aul P arkway S ystem , 1872-1965

Introduction Landscape architect Horace W. S. Cleveland established the early vision of a system of parks and parkways linking the Mississippi River to Lake Como and Phalen Park. His influence in Saint Paul began in 1872 and extended sporadically until about 1890. Saint Paul’s park-making efforts were similar to those in many other American cities during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and by the turn of the twentieth century intersected with efforts to create a modern city according to principles of the City Beautiful Movement. The City Beautiful Movement was a urban planning philosophy with its roots in George Haussmann’s renovation of the Paris boulevard system as well as the Columbian World’s Fair in Chicago in 1893. The movement flourished into the early 1910s intent on introducing beautification and monumental grandeur in cities. The movement promoted beauty as a means to create moral and civic virtue among city populations.

CLEVELAND AND SAINT PAUL: 1872-1894 In February 1872 Cleveland was invited to speak at the “People’s Course of Lectures” held at the Pence Opera House. His topic,

“The Application of Landscape Architecture to the Wants of the West,” was repeated the next night in Saint Paul for the Chamber of Commerce. He urged the acquisition of valuable parkland, especially the bluffs along the Mississippi River gorge. Cleveland was immediately hired by the Saint Paul Common Council to make a “general outline report, upon the proper location of Parks, Wide Avenues, Public Squares, and other improvements, on a scale suitable to the wants of a crowded city.” Cleveland’s report, “A Park System for the City of Saint Paul,” cited the success of older cities such as New York and Chicago in creating park systems. He urged Saint Paul to preserve what “nature had furnished without cost.” He noted: The steep and densely wooded bluffs comprise one of the most important objects in the general outlook. They can possess but little intrinsic value, but if suffered to be marred by quarries, and their picturesque features destroyed, as they are liable to be if left in private hands, they will present a most unsightly aspect, in conspicuous view from all parts of the city . . . a park, or least a fine driveway along the bluff, should by all means be secured, and the bluffs themselves preserved from desecration. H.W.S. Cleveland, A Park System for the City of Saint Paul, June 24, 1872 In the same report, Cleveland defined the boulevard as:

Horace Cleveland photo: minneapolisparkhistory.com

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

simply a grand avenue, of sufficient width to admit of two or three roads for different purposes; as, one for the heavy traffic of teams and business wagons, one for pleasure and driving, and one for equestrians, and also paths of sufficient width to accommodate throngs of pedestrians. The roadways are

separated from each other by rows of trees with intervening grass plots, and sometimes by a broad central mall adorned with fountains, and the paths for pedestrians at the sides or between the roads, are like garden paths, the sides being ornamented with trees, grass, shrubbery and flowers. Such a boulevard provided fresh air, fire protection, and would be within easy access of “all classes of citizens.” His scheme was envisioned to include creation of a Riverside Park and several linkages to Minneapolis. He observed, “Saint Paul and Minneapolis eventually, and at no distant day, will become virtually one city.”

“PRESERVE ABOVE ALL THE WILD AND PICTURESQUE CHARACTER OF THE RIVER BANKS” On June 19, 1885, Cleveland addressed the Saint Paul Common Council and Chamber of Commerce on “Park Ways and Ornamental Parks: the Best System for Saint Paul.” This lecture was combined with his 1872 report and published as Public Parks, Radial Avenues and Boulevards: Outline Plan for a Park System for the City of Saint Paul in 1885. He reiterated his approval of boulevards, relieved at intervals by small parks. A boulevard was not a dreary roadway, 200 feet wide, he noted, “but an extended park, immediately accessible from the adjacent streets, enlivened by all the features of busy life which render the streets themselves attractive. Architectural features needed the graceful drapery of nature.” He foresaw that such boulevards would receive increasing amounts of traffic. In 1890 Cleveland and Park Superintendent John D. Estabrook supervised improvement of Summit Avenue between Lexington and the Mississippi River, and extensive work on Como Avenue. By the end of 1890, Cleveland’s role in Saint Paul had ended.

P a r k way H i s to ry | 3

SAINT PAUL AND THE BICYCLE By the mid-1890s, bicycling enjoyed great popularity across the United States. The Twin Cities Cycle Association and Saint Paul Cycle Path Association campaigned for cycle paths, which were primarily paved sidepaths to existing unpaved roadways. The Saint Paul park commissioners addressed the needs of the bicyclists in 1896: The extraordinary growth and rapid increase of bicycle riding makes necessary a revision of the ordinary system of roadmaking. These light, swift vehicles, driven by man power, are entitled to their right of way equally with the horsedriven carriage. Good, smooth, hard, paths for the former have become as indispensable as good roads for the latter, and should be carefully provided for in all boulevards and parkways. It furnishes a new reason for narrowing the roadways in such parkways and widening the lawn so as to admit of the establishment of bicycle paths through them. The bicycle path will form a feature of all boulevards of parkways which shall come under the jurisdiction of the board. The Saint Paul Cycle Path Association self-funded and built 30 miles of bike paths between 1896 and 1898. In 1898 it was noted that the park commissioners had not “been backward in recognizing the rapidly growing claims of the bicycle to liberal treatment and hospitable accommodation in our system of parks and parkways” as they had budgeted $5,000 for construction of side paths. The number of riders, both men and women, was a “large and rapidly increasing proportion of visitors to Como Park.” By 1902 Saint Paul had 115 miles of cycle paths financed in part by cyclists and overseen by a county commission. Cycle paths lined Lake Como and both sides of Como Avenue Parkway. Enthusiasm for bicycles waned with the introduction of the automobile, and road building for the needs of cars rather than horse carriages and bicycles became the primary transportation focus of the city.

Grotto street path Source: Page 12, St. Paul Globe, June 8th, 1902

Cycling Routes Around the Twin Cities, 1899 (Saint Paul Cycle Path Association)

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

3 | P a r k way H i s to ry

PARKWAY PRINCIPLES Eleven miles of parkway connecting the Mississippi River, Como, Phalen and Indian Mounds parks were contemplated in 1909, “encircling the north half of the city” and ranged from 120 to 400 feet in width. “Ornamentation, seats and fountains” were recommended for intersections about one mile apart. By 1910, the city had about 35 miles of parkways planned, with only thirteen and one-half miles constructed. One mile was planted with 404 elm trees.

Nussbaumer laid out principles of his design aesthetic in the July 1919 issue of Parks and Recreation:

Park Superintendent Frederick Nussbaumer noted in his 1911 Parks Annual Report, “Parkways, although having the character of a street, should be of extraordinary width. They should present verdant features and objects of interest. They should be laid out with an idea of convenience and to reach principal places of interest and the most frequented large parks and public buildings” (Twentieth Annual Report 1911)

The sum of the matter of park construction, is to make the parks less pretentious, less artificial in design and construct them so that the cost of maintenance will be reduced to a minimum. This

The most restful park scenery, and therefore the best, can be obtained by using judiciously, a small number of varieties of the hardiest trees and shrubs, and the wise park maker will confine his choice to those species which nature helps him to select, and which, therefore, stand the best chance of permanent success.

would save money and lessen the danger of competitive exhibition of bad taste and encourage that simplicity which should be the controlling motive of sincere art in our American cities. Nussbaumer warned however that Saint Paul was falling behind other cities. He noted the “absurdly inadequate provisions of funds made by the City Council for parkway system . . . has delayed so many important improvements.” The Twenty-first Annual Report 1912 was one of the last to be illustrated and included a set of drawings of parkway segments, perhaps to emphasize all the work done to date but awaiting funding.

He listed the principles and accomplishments of the Saint Paul parkway system, some echoing Cleveland’s recommendations in 1872 and 1885: “the parkway system practically encircling the entire city;” “the numerous small squares and street intersections” “small inside parks adapted to serve the purpose of recreation for the people in the several neighborhoods;” “a large and extensive driveway of unequaled beauty, leading along the river bluff and commanding enchanting glimpses of river scenery through an old forest growth; a distance of over five miles long” (Twentieth Annual Report 1911) Mississippi River Boulevard, 1918 (Minnesota Historical Society)

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

P a r k way H i s to ry | 3

Grand Round Parkway Historic Features The historic character of the Grand Round is founded on its broad boulevards and parkways, sometimes supplied with a central landscaped median. Much of the parkway route has rolling topography which the roadway and medians carefully accommodated. Only moderate grading and filling appears to have been required along much of the route, except in low-lying or exceptionally steep areas. The parkway primarily provides a spacious setting for house lots except at Phalen and Como, where roadway vistas continue into the park, and at smaller parks such as Hampden. The parkway width ranges from forty feet to more than 200 feet. Concrete curbs line most parkway segments and there are few other roadside details within the immediate viewshed. No historic lighting or other hardware was noted along the route. Kasota stone entry gates and limestone retaining walls at the west sides of Lakes Como and Phalen are among character defining features. These materials are also utilized at some railroad bridge abutments. The consistent tree canopy, grass turf, and limited understory planting are key character-defining features of the parkway. The parkway forest ranges from century-old large oak and elms to plantations of spruce and fir and many types of young deciduous trees. The tree groupings within the medians and along the boulevards are distinctive for their abundance, natural distribution, and the expansive area that typically surrounds them. There is little record of historic planting plans; park planners apparently worked with existing, often native vegetation and added freely from the city’s own diverse nursery stock.

Recommendations During this period, the park board’s nursery furnished stock for parks and parkways as well as street tree plantings. In 1912, the plant list included more than 4,000 seedlings of Elms, Sugar and Red Maple, as well as natives such as White Oak, Horse Chestnut, Butternut, Black Walnut, Basswood, Shellbark Hickory and the exotic Tree of Heaven. The architectural character of the houses lining the parkways varies greatly. Parkway creation, or its prospect, encouraged real estate additions and subdivisions, although none bear picturesque names evoking the adjacent parkway landscape. The symmetry of our park system, when completed as planned, owing to the diversified elements of natural beauty and of the topographical advantages offered within the city and its immediate environments, will be most unique in its detail. It can never be approached by any other city in its picturesque splendor. Twenty-first Annual Report of the Board of Park Commissioners (1911)

This study of the Grand Round’s history was conducted for the City of Saint Paul to provide a foundation for planning new public use amenities along Pelham Boulevard, Raymond Avenue, Como Avenue and Wheelock and Johnson Parkways. The approximately 13-mile route crosses many historic Saint Paul neighborhoods that have been shaped by parkway development. This preliminary study suggests that the primary parkway segments (ca. 19001930) are possibly significant as major components of Saint Paul’s historic park and parkway system. This system, proposed by landscape architect H.W.S. Cleveland and executed during the park superintendency of Frederick Nussbaumer (1891-1922), appears to retain good historic integrity. While the majority of the parkways were completed, it should be noted that Raymond and Como Avenues, while planned as parkways, were never constructed as such and are likely to be considered non-contributory to Saint Paul’s parkway system. Minnesota Architecture Historic Inventory Forms were completed, including expanded historic contexts, for the following parkway segments: •

Wheelock Parkway

•

Wheelock Parkway Median: Edgerton Street to Gateway Bridge

•

Soo Line Railway Bridge (Gateway Trail-Wheelock Parkway Overpass

These inventory forms will allow determination of eligibility for individual segments within the Grand Round by the State Historic Preservation Officer. Potential archaeological resources were not included in this study and should be considered as part of any future planning.

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D esign G uidelines Overview The Grand Round unifies a network of community and regional parks, parkways, neighborhood landmarks and destinations, scenic viewpoints, public art and a host of stories that unfold as one traverses the entire loop. Its “Grandness” is evidenced by the sum of its many parks linked seamlessly together by a consistent thread of color, art, branding, and site furnishings and the use of consistent materials and site furniture contributes to a level of branding and placemaking. Unifying the Grand Round’s historic nature and varied neighborhood character is completed using a standardized palette of elements used over the length of the 26-mile system.

USING THESE GUIDELINES These guidelines illustrate holistic standards to create the sitespecific elements necessary for the design and implementation of the Grand Round project. Grand Round designers and planners can interpret these guidelines based on site conditions, project funding, and continuing neighborhood input over the course of multiple phases. The Design Guidelines are divided into three parts: Identity and Branding • Grand Round Identity • Logo Green Infrastructure • Landscaping • Water Resources Placemaking • Placemaking and Interpretation • Site Furnishings • Public Art • Trails, Sidewalks, and Roadways • Materials • Gateway Nodes • Wayfinding Each part provides greater detail into the individual elements proposed for Grand Round gateway nodes, interpretive nodes, and corridor markers.

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

GRAND ROUND LOGO The Grand Round is a 26-mile linear greenway bringing together Saint Paul’s parks and parkways, verdant open spaces, vibrant and historic neighborhoods, and the majestic Mississippi River. With such a large and diverse route, the objective was to create a distinct and instantly recognizable identity that connects the entire route. The identity needed to be simple and intuitive to serve as a quick, consistent reassurance to the Grand Round user that they are on the right path. With that in mind it also needed to be flexible enough to be able to integrate across the City’s other wayfinding systems. Finally, the mark needed to distinctly reflect Saint Paul’s character as defined by community input (grounded, proud and friendly) as well as the history and vision for the Grand Round.

GRAND ROUND LOGO USAGE The Grand Round Identity serves as an emblem of Saint Paul’s unique, proud history. The logo system honors the historic character of the parkway and its vision to encircle the whole of Saint Paul and connect to its neighborhoods and parks. The logo also captures the friendliness of Saint Paul, while the filigree and type treatment nod both to the city’s pride and the historic nature of the Grand Round. The logo will be used along the route on location and directional signs, as well as site furnishings, utility covers, and other elements to reinforce the Grand Round brand. The Grand Round logo and colors can be used in print and online media such as the City’s Grand Round webpage and Facebook which further strengthen the Grand Round identity. It can be used in social media settings, such as on Twitter and Instagram, to alert followers to events, facts, and other features that invite visitors to explore the Grand Round.

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Identity and Branding

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Design Guidelines | 4

Green Infrastructure- Landscaping INTRODUCTION

A NOTE ON SUSTAINABILITY

One of the Grand Round’s truly unique features are its mature trees and historic green spaces. Reinforcing this verdant environment is paramount to building an appreciative audience for the Grand Round. The landscape objectives for the Grand Round are drawn from the historical vision and the City of Saint Paul’s 2010 Street and Park Tree Master Plan:

Design means, methods, and materials for the Grand Round should positively contribute to the health and well-being of human and natural systems, and serve as a template for urban habitat restoration. Landscape and stormwater elements noted in the following pages were selected based on their overall environmental and economic sustainability, historic character, as well as their natural and social benefits.

•

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design is another key to providing all users a safe and enjoyable experience. A wellmaintained space or trail with high visibility, good lighting, and attractive landscaping communicates a feeling of safety.

•

Maintenance: Excessive leaf and fruit drop and brittle branching should be a factor in tree selection where trees overhang the trail and sidewalks.

LIMITATIONS IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT

•

Diseases and invasive pests: In the mid to late 20th century, Dutch Elm disease ravaged the City’s elms, effectively eliminating them from parks and parkways. Hybridized Dutch

•

• •

Outline the guiding principles, design standards, and methods that promote a healthy and diverse urban forest (growing conditions) Provide a list of appropriate canopy tree species for the urban environment with information on selecting the proper tree Illustrate the goals and alternative planting patterns that create a diverse urban canopy (design elements)

One of the guiding principles focuses on creating a Grand Round that places high value on neighborhoods, history, and the natural environment. This is achieved through a philosophy of increasing the City’s urban canopy where ever possible in a manner that is safe, benefits both people and wildlife, and promotes sustainability throughout the Grand Round. This section of the Manual will provide further information on the design intent for the following elements: • • •

Landscaping Water Resources Project Applications

The built environment impacts the growing conditions for trees through increased levels of soil compaction, impervious surface and pollution. This results in reduced rainwater infiltration to rooting zones, increased stormwater runoff, increased salt levels from winter deicing, higher temperatures, and increased incidence of accidental damage to tree trunks. Factors in tree selection should accommodate the following elements: •

Overhead and underground utilities: Mature tree size both above and below ground level must be considered where there are utilities located close to the trunk and roots of the tree.

•

Buildings and flatwork: Mature tree size both above and below ground level must be considered where there are buildings within close proximity, or where flatwork such as sidewalks and curbs are located close to the trunk and roots of the tree.

•

Safety and clear sight lines: Vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians must have unobstructed views at driveways, street crossings, and trail connections. Selecting trees that will not block sight lines with low foliage is key to the safety of all users. This includes sight lines to signage.

Elm-resistant trees now allow for elms to be replanted into the City’s canopy. Today the Emerald Ash Borer is posing a similar threat to the City’s Ash trees. Currently, there is no viable treatment other than removal. Nearly 450 of the canopy trees along the Grand Round route are Ash trees. The City Forester has developed a protocol for monitoring and removing Ash trees. Accordingly, Ash trees along the Grand Round are being monitored and may be removed in the future pending the development of a treatment option.

Adult Emerald Ash Borer, less than 1/4” long. Photo: www.EmeraldAshBorer.info

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Green Infrastructure- Landscaping There are three characteristic landscape corridor types observed along the route and should be applied to the Grand Round. The proposed landscaping types match the current landscape character as closely as possible, with modifications based on a number of criteria, such as traffic and pedestrian safety, visual sight distances, adjacent uses, soil types, soil moisture, shade requirements, neighborhood character, history, adjoining green space design, tree species, as well as native vegetation adapted to the needs of stormwater management, and habitat restoration. The landscape corridor types, noted below, focus on the linear character of the existing parkway system and will vary as the width of the right-of-way changes along the length of the Grand Round. The three landscape corridor types are: Formal Corridor - represented by evenly spaced rows of the same species of trees on one or both sides of the right-of-way. Naturalistic Corridor - represented by plantings of multiple species of trees in a natural pattern on one or both sides of the right-of-way. Designed Corridor - represented by plantings of trees in available spaces due to the narrow width of the right-of-way as well as the amount of paving, utilities, compacted soils, etc. These urban trees are typically planted where there is sufficient room for successful growth.

Median trees, stone wall, and lighting at Phalen Boulevard

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Hybrid Corridor - in certain segments of the Grand Round, landscape corridor types will be a combination of the above to allow for greater flexibility due to site specific conditions.

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Green Infrastructure - Landscaping Formal Corridor Avenue or boulevard tree planting is the most common and visually prominent positioning of trees. Formal planting generally involves the use of single species with the intent of achieving a consistent tree form and size, complimented by mass planting of a uniform, structured understory. This results in a visually strong, rhythmic outcome.

Naturalistic Corridor Informal planting generally involves the grouping of trees and cluster planting, where possible. This arrangement is commonly used in areas where the right-of-way is wider or there is greater opportunity for meandering the multi-use trail, such as within the parkways and parks. Informal plantings usually consist of several tree species grouped to create concentrated planting islands. As such, the landscape has a more informal and naturalistic character.

Designed Corridor

NORTH

The clustering of one or several species of trees and understory plantings are positioned to create an artificial dynamic suitable for a more urban location, such as a business district or commercial campus. Trees and shrubs are laid out in patterns and lines to explore and give definition to and along the multi-use trail. They can be used to frame vistas or provide pockets of shade at key locations. The result is a softer, more humane streetscape that provides variety, interest and diversity. G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Green Infrastructure - Landscaping LANDSCAPE CORRIDORS TYPES

ay W of

y Right of Wa

Right of Way

Rig

ay fW to

Rig

y Wa of

of Way

Right

Rig

r rook T

ENGLIS H

I 35E

yA rit

p os Pr

TE TA

MINNEH

Euclid St ph

HOY T

rgy

UofM S

Pa rk

Dale St Arccade St

Lake Como Como il

R WA

En e

riv e

Dr ive

HOY T

Battle C

UofM Tra

State Fair Grounds Battle Creek-Highwood St. Anthony Park Payne-Phalen UofM Saint Paul En

a Tr

Lake

erg

yP a

Campus

rd Fo

i Ra

St. Antho

ne Ca rgy UofM Saint Paul Pa rk Campus D

Dale St

Como

Edgerton St

H 7T

HOY T

Otto Ave

Como

TYPOL TYPO

ER St. AnthonyWAPark RN

aymon d Av e

North End

State Fair Grounds

Indian Mound Trail

Ra nd

Greenbrier St

LA RPENTEUR

o R aym n d Av Rice e

H 7T

E 35

Av e

IL L

il ra yT a w te Euclid St Ga

Margaret St Western Ave

KELL

Rig

ENGLIS H

EN H AL

k Tr

PAYNE

r rook T Trout B

Rice St

5E I3

Grounds

OG G

g Ave

GG StateOFair

W ay of Ave Reaney fW ht MIT t o

Rig

Smith Ave

PAYNE

I 35E

SUMMIT

Summit Hill AY D

H 7T

KEL L

Snelling Ave

KEL L

Smith Ave

Dale St 5E

rout B

Rice St

Dale St ENGLIS Arccade St H

Lexington Ave

Arccade St

Edgerton St

Hamline Ave

Greenbrier St

Edgerton St

CLE VELAND

Greenbrier St

Snelling Ave

Trout B

Rice St

r rook T

r rook T Trout B

Rice St

Pelham Ave

Lexington Ave

Margaret St

mith Ave

Davern St

Br id 55

Snelling Ave

Smith Ave

Av e

vern St

do lp Ra n

e uc

Summit-University HAL EN y

rid

ai Tr

Reaney Ave

E UofM Saint Paul 35 EnSummit Hill erg TE Campus TA HOY T yP S R

Ford Pkwy

HOY T

St. Anthony Park

MM SU Highland Pkwy

RANDOLPH

UofM Transi t

B WA

West Side

COMO

MI T

e uc

TYPOLOGY 2: wn OFF-STREET WITH NARROW BOULEVARD tow TYPOLOGY 4: nURBANTRAIL OFF STREET BIKE TRAIL Do Summit-University M SU

SUMMIT

Dr ive

UofM Saint Paul Campus rk

o Aft

Lake HOY T Summit-University Como SUMMIT

Dayton's Bluff URBANDoOFF-STREET BIKE LANEIndian wntown Mound Trail Lake Designed Corridor I35E Phalen Dayton's BluffWest Seventh

Jefferson Ave TYPOLOGY 6: RS

t nS so ck t St Ja r be Ro

Merriam St. Anthony Park

En erg yP Summit Ave a

5E I3

Highland

i Ra

State Fair Grounds Park/Lexington-Hamline Summit Ave

V NI

TY SI

Macalester-Groveland IT Y

rd Fo

s ba Wa

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016 l ai Tr

Thomas-Dale(Frogtown)

o Aft

Marshall Ave

Merriam Park/Lexington-Hamline

Thomas-Dale(Frogtown)

TYPOLOGY 1: ON-STREET BIKE LANE

CO M

Greater East Side to

HOY T

ANNAP OLIS

Rig

UNIVERS ITY

Gre

n Thomas-Dale(Frogtown) Payne-Phalen Ve ve

Summit Ave O

Lake Phalen

Marshall Ave

ay fW to

CO M

Lake North End Phalen

Payne-Phalen

ay fW to

Rig

LA RPENTEUR

UNIVERS ITY

H IG

Dale St

Dale St Hamline Ave

IGHT

Hamline Ave

Hamline-Midway

North End

estern Ave

IGHT

MCK N

PIERCE B UTLER

Lexington Ave

TYPO

LA RPENTEUR

PIERCE B UTLER

North End PIERCE B UTLER

CLE VELAND

ANNAP OLIS

rsi ty Av e

H IG

H 7T

Otto Ave

OG G

R WA

Pelham Ave

i Ra

o R aym n d Av e

IGHT MCK N

MCK N

o R aym n d Av ay e

I35E

t nS so ck t St Ja r A SH be BA Ro WA St a sh ba 52 Wa AY HW

CLE VELAND

Snelling Ave

Snelling Ave ay

Arccade St

PAYNE

A h lp

Ra nd o

Av e

rsi ty Av e Pelham Ave

Smith Ave

Smith Ave o v R aym n de Av e

ive

lp do

PAYNE

I 35 E

Edgerton St

I 35 E

MCK N

Lexington Ave I 35E

Arccade St

ENGLIS H

Greenbrier St

ok Tr ro Trout B

Rice St

Arccade St

Hamline Ave Dale St

Edgerton St

Rice St

Dale St

Greenbrier St

Snelling Ave

PAYNE

Ra n

Rig

y wa te a G

Way Right RightofofWay

Western Ave

ay fW to

rsi ty Av e Battle Creek-Highwood

ive

Battle Creek-Highwood

MINNEH AHA

West Side 9 4

COMO

y Right of Wa

Western Ave

Pelham Ave CLE VELAND

wWA RNER

COMO

WestWA RSidenive

Lake Como

il ra I35E yT a ew at

COMO

a Tr

Indian Mound Trail

i ra lT

rd Fo

H OM

KEL L

Western Ave

Pelham Ave

UofM Transi t

Margaret St

Dayton's Bluff

Dr ive

MINNEH AHA

St UofM TrEuclid ansit

Otto Ave

52 H 7T

Dr ive

Reaney Ave

OG G

Euclid St

Indian Mound Trail

Lake Como

Como

State Fair Grounds

Dayton's Bluff

West SeventhEuclid St AS

HW TE

KELL

H 7T

B WA

H IG

IT MM

H OM

R TE

B WA

TE TA

IL L

Highland Pkwy

t nS so ck t St r be Ro

Ford Pkwy

OG G

LEN

Como

MINNEH AHA

Margaret St

UofM Saint Paul Campus

Pa rk

UofM Transit

TYPOLOGY 4: OFF-STREET TRAIL BET WEEN TYPOLOGY 5: ON-STREET BIKE LANE West Seventh Battle Creek-Highwood //DRAFT// FRONTAGE ROAD & BOULEVARD 01/12/16 Ave Formal Corridor Highland G R A NMarshall D RO U N D L A N DS CA P E ST RAT EG I ES Battle Creek-Highwood Como Merriam Park/Lexington-Hamline Hybrid of Naturalistic & Formal pg. 2 RANDOLPH

SUMMIT

s ba Wa

Jefferson Ave

ummit-University

AY D

Ford Pkwy

TE TA

KELL

Dr ive

H IG

SUMMIT

Summit Hill

TE TA

t nS so St ck

M UM

RANDOLPH

Downtown Highland Pkwy

Summit-University

ert

IL L

H 7T

n Margaret St E ntow Dow 35 b Ro

Indian Mound Trail Summit Ave

Reaney Ave

s ba Wa

AY D

PITa rk

PH A

UofM Saint Paul Campus

Pa rk

SUMMIT

rgy

Reaney Ave

TYPOLOGY 5: OFF-STREET TRAIL IN MEDIAN

St. Anthony Park

En e

LEN

Anthony Park

B WA

UNIVERS ITY

Macalester-Groveland Thomas-Dale(Frogtown) Merriam Park/Lexington-Hamline TY Jefferson Ave SI ER Dayton's Bluff IV UN

ill

LYEN PHRAS IT

rgy

ntown Anthony Dow Park

PH A

UofM Saint Paul H Campus 7T Fair Grounds State

En e

rgy

Thomas-Dale(Frogtown)

Summit Ave

RN Macalester-Groveland WA

l ai Tr o nt Ve e v e uc yA Br rit pe s o Pr

E Summit-University ne

l ai Tr o nt Ve e v e A uc ity Br er sp o Pr

Greater East Side

HOY T

H IG

St.

Summit Hill MarshallEuclid Ave

CO M

Merriam Park/Lexington-Hamline MINNEH AHA Hamline-Midway

Margaret St

ai Tr

t nS so ck t St r be Ro

Marshall Ave

Ave

CO M

UNIVERS ITY

PIERCE B UTLER

HOY T

Greater East Side

S ITY

TYPOLOGY 3: OFF-STREET TRAIL Como IN MEDIAN FairHybrid of Naturalistic &Lake Formal Grounds State Como il

TYPOLOGY 4: URBAN OFF STREET BIKE TRAIL

Lake Phalen

s ba Wa

L EN Un PH A ive Reaney rsi ty Av e

Hamline-Midway

OFF-STREET TRAIL IN BOULEVARD Greater East Side Formal Corridor

Payne-Phalen

LA RPENTEUR

to en e eV O Av c u ity Br r HOY T pe Payne-Phalen North End os Pr S ITY St. Payne-Phalen Thomas-Dale(Frogtown) PIERCE B UTLER

IGHT

Lake Como

Lexington Ave

North End

o R aym n d Av e

Como

Av e CLE VELAND

COMO

UofM Transi t

ve yA rit

I35E

Lake Phalen

TYPOLOGY 2:

ai Tr ay ew at

North G End

Hamline Ave

ity

Dr ive

Phalen

COMO

p os Pr U niv ers

Campus

yP ark

e eV uc Snelling Ave

State Fair Grounds

St. Anthony Park

ne-Phalen UofM Saint Paul En

i ra

T UofM o Transit

Dr ive

o R aym n d Av Rice e

HOY T

erg

r rook T

Pa rk

Greater East Side

Dale St Arccade St

rgy

State Fair Grounds

UofM Saint Paul Campus

Trout B

En e

Lake LA RPENTEUR Como

LA RPENTEUR

ENGLIS H

TYPOLOGY 3: OFF-STREET TRAIL WITH VARIED BOULEVARD

y TYPOLOGY 1: OFF-STREET TRAIL IN BOULEVARD wa te a G St. Anthony Park Lake Naturalistic Corridor I35E

ok Tr

LEVARD

HOY T

ro Trout B

Lake Phalen

I35E

ENGLIS H

Greenbrier St

l ai Tr Como

LA RPENTEUR ENGLIS H

Greenbrier St

ai Tr ay ew at

DESIGN GUIDELINES | 4 Naturalistic Tree Planting Protect Existing Trees Utilize Diverse Tree Palette Pedestrian Light

5’ Sidewalk

TYPOLOGY 1: OFF-STREET TRAIL IN BOULEVARD Naturalistic Corridor

Varies Boulevard

12’-13’ Traffic Lane

Linear Street Trees Spaced Evenly

Narrow Boulevard

10’ Bike Trail

Varies Boulevard

5’ Sidewalk

2’ Clear Promote rainwater infiltration through grass swales within trail construction limits

G R A N D R O U N D D E S I G N & I M P L E M E N TAT I O N P L A N | A P R I L 2 0 1 6

4 | DESIGN GUIDELINES

Pedestrian Light uniform spacing

5’ Sidewalk

Varies Grass Boulevard

TYPOLOGY 2: OFF-STREET TRAIL IN BOULEVARD Formal Corridor

12-13’ Travel Lane

Linear Street Trees Evenly Spaced

Narrow Boulevard

10’ Bike trail

2’ Clear

G R A N D R O U N D D E S I G N & I M P L E M E N TAT I O N P L A N | A P R I L 2016

Varies Grass Boulevard

5’ Sidewalk

DESIGN GUIDELINES | 4

Naturalistic Tree Planting Protect Existing Trees Utilize Diverse Tree Palette

Linear Street Trees Evenly Spaced

Pedestrian Light

5’ Sidewalk

Narrow Boulevard

20’ Traffic Lane

Varies Boulevard

TYPOLOGY 3: OFF-STREET TRAIL IN MEDIAN Hybrid of Naturalistic & Formal

10’ Bike trail

10’ Traffic Lane 20’ Traffic Lane

Promote rainwater infiltration through grass swales within trail construction limits

Narrow Boulevard

5’ Sidewalk

2’ Clear

G R A N D R O U N D D E S I G N & I M P L E M E N TAT I O N P L A N | A P R I L 2 0 1 6

4 | DESIGN GUIDELINES

Naturalistic Tree Planting Protect Existing Trees Utilize Diverse Tree Palette

Pedestrian Light Naturalistic Tree Planting Protect Existing Trees Utilize Diverse Tree Palette

Narrow Boulevard

18’ Frontage Road

TYPOLOGY 4: OFF-STREET TRAIL BET WEEN FRONTAGE ROAD & BOULEVARD Hybrid of Naturalistic & Formal

G R A N D R O U N D D E S I G N & I M P L E M E N TAT I O N P L A N | A P R I L 2016

Varies Boulevard

13’ Traffic Lane

Varies Boulevard

Promote rainwater infiltration through grass swales within trail construction limits

10’-12’ Bike Trail

Varies Boulevard

2’ Clear

18’ Frontage Road

Narrow Boulevard

DESIGN GUIDELINES | 4 Pedestrian Light

Linear Street Trees Spaced Evenly Linear Street Trees Spaced Evenly

5’ Sidewalk

TYPOLOGY 5: ON-STREET BIKE LANE Formal Corridor

Wide Boulevard

Plant Trees 42” Clear from Face of Curb

8’ Parking Lane

6’ Bike Lane

12’ Traffic Lane

6’ Bike Lane

8’ Parking Lane

Narrow Boulevard

5’ Sidewalk

Plant Trees 42” Clear from Face of Curb G R A N D R O U N D D E S I G N & I M P L E M E N TAT I O N P L A N | A P R I L 2 0 1 6

4 | DESIGN GUIDELINES

Pedestrian Light

Linear Street Trees Spaced Evenly

10’ Sidewalk

8’ Parking Lane

11’ Traffic Lane

TYPOLOGY 6: URBAN OFF-STREET BIKE LANE Designed Corridor

12’ Center Lane

11’ Traffic Lane

8’ Parking Lane

10’ Bike Trail

Tactile Edge Paving Site Furnishings Area

G R A N D R O U N D D E S I G N & I M P L E M E N TAT I O N P L A N | A P R I L 2016

10’ Sidewalk

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Green Infrastructure - Landscaping PREFERRED CANOPY TREES FOR THE GRAND ROUND The following tree species are drawn from the City’s Street and Park Tree Master Plan (2010) and should be considered for use in the Grand Round with approval of the City Forester. Minimum caliper size is 2” adjacent to streets and walks, 1.5” caliper in open spaces. *Velvet Pillar Flowering Crab Austrian Pine Red Pine

Malus ‘Velvet Pillar’ Pinus nigra Pinus resinosa Pinus strobus White Pine Pinus sylvestris Scotch Pine Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Quercus alba White Oak Quercus bicolor Swamp White/ Bicolor Oak Quercus x warei ‘Long’ Regal Prince Oak Northern Pin Oak Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak Quercus robur ‘Fastigiata’ Fastigiate English Oak Quercus rubra Red Oak Sorbus alnifolia *Korean Mountain Ash Tilia americana ‘McKSentry’ American Sentry Linden Tilia americana ‘Boulevard’ Boulevard Linden Tilia americana ‘Redmond’ Redmond Linden Accolade Elm Ulmus ‘Accolade’ Ulmus x ‘Cathedral’ Cathedral Elm Ulmus davidiana japonica Discovery Elm Ulmus carpinifolia ‘Homestead’ Homestead Elm Ulmus x ‘New Horizon’ New Horizon Elm Ulmus americana ‘Princeton’ Princeton Elm Ulmus rubra Red Elm Ulmus ‘Morton Glossy’ Triumph Elm Ulmus americana ‘Valley Forge’ Valley Forge Elm * Flowering tree

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

PREFERRED LANDSCAPE DETAILS

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Green Infrastructure - Water Resources OVERVIEW The Grand Round project is within two watershed districts that define the stormwater requirements for any portion of the project: Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) and Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) NPDES General Permit would likely apply to any project on the Grand Round given that any phase would disturb more than one acre of land and possibly add one acre or more acres of new impervious surface. However, the requirements of the two watershed districts are more stringent than the MPCA requirements and were the basis of the stormwater management design for the Grand Round. The majority of the Johnson Parkway, Phalen Park, and portions of the Wheelock Parkway trail segments are located within the RWMWD, while the remaining segments are within the CRWD. The stormwater requirements for the two districts are essentially identical and the main requirements are listed below:

METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) The Grand Round will consist of multiple phases in the coming years to complete the overall route. Stormwater requirements will be met for each phase and the final stormwater BMPs will be based on the proposed roadway/trail alignment and geometry, proposed storm sewer design and the underlying soils. For this design guide, the most logical way to present the stormwater requirements is to lay out all the higher potential BMP locations to give future designers flexibility based on the specific phase they are constructing. The BMPs shown here are not what is required to meet the watershed requirements but rather all the higher potential locations selected after a review of a more extensive list with project partners. The locations identified provide a much

greater water quality volume than the need currently anticipated for the projects. The runoff rate requirements are potentially the most difficult to meet for the Grand Round given its linear nature. The rate control will need to be determined on a phase by phase basis as it is not possible to analyze a part of the overall route in isolation given that proposed storm sewer designs, road geometry layouts, and selected water quality BMPs will impact the results. For each phase of the Grand Round, appropriate hydrograph and reservoir routing methods will be utilized to analyze proposed rates. The linear nature of the Grand Round may make construction of rate control BMPs extremely expensive and impractical, at which point additional discussion regarding requirements versus feasibility will need to take place with the watershed districts. Additionally, existing ponds could be expanded or underground storage could be incorporated for rate control. The runoff volume requirement was the primary driver for the BMP layout for this manual. Water quality volume is dependent upon the treatment selected. Infiltration is the preferred method for retention but will not be possible in all areas given the variability of soils, bedrock elevations and groundwater levels. Filtration can be utilized to obtain partial water quality volume credit in areas where infiltration is not possible. Both districts count the stormwater volume treated by filtration with typical porous media as 55% credit towards the water quality volume. If iron-enhanced sand is used as the filtration media, the districts count the volume treated as 80% credit towards the water quality volume.

The level of volume control credit for the three primary BMP types is summarized in the following table.

Type of BMP

Volume Control Credit

Infiltration

100%

Filtration

55%

Iron-Enhanced Sand Filtration

80%

Table 1: CRWD and RWMWD Volume Control Credits by BMP

The water quality requirements by both districts are met in full if the runoff volume requirements are achieved. However, if alternative compliance is required because the volume requirement cannot be achieved, the water quality requirements must be met by alternative practices such as wet detention ponds or in-line manhole treatments such as baffle plates within sumped manholes. There are a few important details when looking at the watershed district rules. The impervious area used to calculate the water quality volume refers to new impervious or existing impervious that is reconstructed, meaning the subgrade is disturbed. Pavement rehabilitations and maintenance that do not expose the subgrade do not trigger the water quality volume requirements. Additionally, the watershed districts have a cost cap of $30,000 per impervious acre for stormwater BMPs, which prevents projects that are not ideal for BMPs from increasing their budgets unrealistically.

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Green Infrastructure - Water Resources Water Resources BMP SELECTION

UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION / FILTRATION

The potential BMPs for the Grand Round corridor were selected and placed based on discussions with the City Public Works Department, City Parks and Recreation Department, and the two watershed districts. There were several key design preferences, based on the discussions, which helped identify the locations and types of BMPs for the Grand Round corridor:

The primary BMP proposed along the Grand Round is underground infiltration/filtration. This can consist of either linear infiltration/ filtration trenches beneath/along roadways or larger footprint underground infiltration systems with the surface being re-purposed into green space or parking areas. The linear underground BMP consists of routing stormwater pre-treated by a sumped manhole to an aggregate trench underneath the roadway via perforated plastic pipes. The stormwater then either infiltrates into permeable soils at the bottom of the trench or is captured by a perforated pipe and is routed back into the storm sewer system. An example detail of a linear underground infiltration trench is shown in Figure 1 below.

•

Large BMPs are preferred over smaller, distributed BMPs (i.e. rain gardens). The maintenance required for many small BMPs makes them infeasible for an overall project of this scale. The small BMP’s are also not compatible with the historic parkway character of grass and trees.

•

Ash trees can be removed, but other trees along the parkways should be left in place in most cases unless approved by the City Forester.

•

Underground infiltration/filtration has been used successfully

The linear underground infiltration/filtration is ideal in the parkway areas given that the utilities in many of the areas are sparse and there are larger, deeper storm sewer pipes to outlet into if filtration

is used. Additionally, this BMP has been used by the City of Saint Paul for other roadway projects, so they are equipped to maintain the treatment systems. Furthermore, there can be bio-infiltration and/or landscaped areas planted in the median or boulevard areas above these trenches, which is both aesthetically pleasing and adds to the treatment volumes. The larger scale underground infiltration BMPs are shown under existing baseball fields in two areas of Johnson Parkway and Phalen Park. The BMP consists of installing a network of large diameter plastic pipes to gather stormwater and infiltrate it into the soil below. The surface of the BMP can be re-constructed to its original purpose as was done in Hampden Park, shown in Figure 2 below. However, this option is less preferred if treatment can be obtained underneath the roadway.

on other street projects in the area and is preferred by public works. •

Retrofitting existing wet ponds along the loop with ironenhanced sand filters is an acceptable practice.

•

Loss of functional park land for surface stormwater BMPs is not preferred.

Figure 1: Typical cross-section of a linear underground infiltration trench at Wordsworth Avenue

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Figure 2: Large scale underground infiltration BMP at Hampden Park

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Green Infrastructure - Water Resources Water Resources BIO-FILTRATION / FILTRATION BASINS

IRON-ENHANCED SAND FILTER BENCH

TREE TRENCHES / URBAN PLANTERS

There are several basins proposed along the Grand Round corridor (shown in the appendix maps). These basins are largescale depressions that allow stormwater to either infiltrate into underlying soil or filter through porous media via an underdrain system. There are few areas through the Grand Round that have the available footprint for these basins given the large amount of trees through the parkway and the future trail expansion. The areas where these basins are proposed are also areas where underground infiltration could be utilized based on preferences of the stakeholders. Additionally, dependent on the final trail alignment, there are also opportunities to have these basins in large median areas. An example photo of a typical bio-filtration basin is shown in Figure 3.

Currently, there are stormwater BMPs along the Grand Round, so retrofitting some of these structures may be a cost-effective solution to obtaining better water quality. There are four existing wet ponds in Phalen Park and portions of Wheelock Parkway that have potential to be retrofitted with an iron-enhanced sand filter bench. These BMPs are linear sand filters with iron filings that help remove dissolved pollutants from stormwater. The watershed districts count 80% of the water routed through the filter benches towards the water quality volume. The installation of these benches would require further coordination with the property owners of the ponds, especially those near the golf course west of Lake Phalen. Figure 4 shows an iron-enhanced sand filter bench at Prior Lake, Minnesota.

There are areas along Como Avenue and Raymond Avenue that are very urbanized, having little green space and many utilities under the roadway, particularly along Raymond Ave and Como Ave, west of Snelling Ave. These areas would be ideal for tree trenches and/or urban planters in the boulevard areas. These types of BMPs can be used for infiltration or filtration dependent on the underlying soils. The tree trenches would be preferred if the existing trees along the street could be transplanted for the BMP. These BMPs are smaller than most, but given that there is little area for any other BMPs, they would be necessary and aesthetically pleasing in these areas. Figure 5 shows a typical tree trench.

Figure 3: Typical bio-filtration basin

Figure 4: Iron-enhanced sand filter bench at Prior Lake, Minnesota

Figure 5: Typical design of tree trench

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Green Infrastructure - Water Resources CONCEPT STUDIES The two studies shown to the left represent two different approaches to dealing with storm water. Where possible, infiltration if the preferred method of handling runoff. Where runoff needs to be guided away from the trail, small swales can direct water to a stormwater facility. These small swales provide both treatment and habitat for wildlife.

Blvd.

Maintain Exist. 10’ Trail Maintain Exist. Grades & Grades & Vegetation Vegetation Drainage Clear Clear Swale Zone Zone + Augment

Blvd.

Maintain Exist.

Blvd.

Maintain Exist.

CONCEPT STUDY: SWALE AT MEDIAN TRAIL

Blvd.

Maintain Exist. 10’ Trail Maintain Exist. Grades & Grades & Vegetation Clear Vegetation Ret. Seat Clear Zone Zone Wall + Augment

CONCEPT STUDY: WALL AT MEDIAN TRAIL

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Sometimes the topography and narrow right-of-way exceed the ability to provide for swales, trails, and other amenities. Small retaining walls can be fit into the slopes and provide adjacent resting areas for Grand Round users.

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Pelham Avenue looking north

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking PLACEMAKING Placemaking is simply described as creating a “sense of place.” It is a concept first raised in the 1960’s that focused on designing cities for people and to get away from the auto-centric emphasis that had dominated city planning since the 1950’s. Placemaking’s principle is that people choose to settle where amenities, natural and cultural resources, and recreational opportunities exist to support their lifestyles and thus their community. Placemaking in Saint Paul is about discovering and highlighting the common ground where people gather – from sidewalks to plazas; from parks and trails, from the riverfront to the bluffs; from urban apartments and condos to single-family residential neighborhoods. Each of Saint Paul’s seventeen neighborhoods has a unique architectural, cultural, and ecological character. The Grand Round, through its linear connective quality, offers unique placemaking opportunities as the route winds through each neighborhood, reflecting its character, and then reflects it in the selection of placemaking design elements such as landscape character, paving types, gateway nodes, wayfinding signage, interpretive panels, mile markers, lighting, public art, and site furnishings as outlined in the section. Unifying the Grand Round’s historic nature and varied neighborhood character is completed using a standardized palette of elements used over the length of the 26-mile system. This has identified three prototypical approaches to the “Gateway Nodes” on the Design Recommendation Maps. These three designs include the menu of amenities envisioned for the Grand Round:

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

1. Plaza with seat wall, open access to adjacent public space and complementary landscape. This application is envisioned for locations without significant topography where it is desired to provide ease of access to adjacent public spaces such as the Pelham/Mississippi River Blvd. intersection. 2. Overlook Plaza with seat wall and ornamental railings. This application is envisioned at locations with significant adjacent drops in elevation, sensitive adjacent landscapes and/or significant viewsheds for interpretation. 3. Backdrop plaza with seat walls. This application is envisioned where adjacent topography creates a retaining wall condition such as the Johnson/Burns intersection or the junction with the Gateway Trail. These Gateway nodes are designed to be further customized and animated with infused branding, public art and lighting applications as outlined in the Public Art section and based on community input at the time of implementation. Paving, stone walls, columns and railings have all been identified as “canvasses” for integrated art applications. In addition, smaller features, such as stone signage walls and markers are envisioned at prominent intersections such as Johnson/ Burns and Pelham/Mississippi River Blvd., highlighting the Grand Round to both motorists as wells as trail users.

Design Guidelines | 4

P.1.3

P.3.4

P.2.3

Edgerton St

Rice St

r rook T Trout B

P.1.8

ive P.3.3 rs

P.3.2

405 Av e

Hamline-Midway

CLE VELAND

ity

4 P.3.1 P.2.2 I9

CO M

o nt

P.3.21

406 Thomas-Dale(Frogtown) I UN

P.2.1

414

RANDOLPH

5E I3

Smith Ave

416

Interpretive Node

P.3.____ X

Art/Corridor Marker

P.1.____ X

Existing Signage Grand Round signs will be installed at all intersections along the corridor. (Typically on street lights and other Grand Round amenities)

Av e

See Placemaking & Wayfinding matrix on page 116 for more information.

415

Jefferson Ave

P.2.____ X

P.3.29

Battle Creek-Highwood

R WA

Western Ave

P.3.26 P.3.27

MINNEH AHA

Gateway Node

P.3.30 Dayton's Bluff

IL L

OG G

407Euclid St

KEL L

Macalester-Groveland

TE TA

H IG

AY D

t nS so St ck

411

East 7th Street

P.1.10

B WA

SUMMIT

412

ert

Summit Hill

P.3.22

P.1.____ X

Indian Mound Trail

P3.x Corridor Summit Ave Marker 1-sided

b Ro

Summit-University

Merriam Park/Lexington-Hamline

410

s ba Wa

P.1.1

P.3.25

WAYFINDING

P.2.6

P.3.24

P.3.28

Downtown

409

L EN

P.3.23

Reaney Ave

IT Y

H 7T

408

P.1.2

Margaret St

UNIVERS ITY

Marshall Ave

e e eV Av uc ity r pe os P.3.19 Pr

P.3.20

PH A

Type – Placemaking (P) Hierarchy designation Location designation – see detailed map and location schedule

a Tr

P.1.9

Payne-Phalen

Typical Key:

402 North End

404 Greater East Side

PIERCE B UTLER

West Side

P.1.11

West Seventh

Highland Pkwy

Otto Ave

ANNAP OLIS

Ford Pkwy H 7T

P.1.13

i ra lT

Davern St

idg e Br

S on Aft

P.1.12

NORTH

H OM

Highland

i Ra

rd Fo

413

Pelham Ave

Dale St

P.1.5

PAYNE

o R aym n d Av e

P.3.5ofM Transit

P.3.8

403

P.3.18

IGHT

COMO

P.3.6

P.3.10

P.3.17

Lake Phalen

MCK N

Dr ive

P.1.4

P.3.9

Ra n

Pa rk

P.3.7

P.2.4

P.3.16

L EGEN D

LA RPENTEUR

I 35E

400

UofM Saint Paul Campus P.1.2

Lexington Ave

rgy

En e

Lake Como

P.3.11

Hamline Ave

St. Anthony Park

401

Snelling Ave

State Fair Grounds

W.3.6

P.3.12 P.1.6

Como

HOY T

P.3.14 I35E P.1.7

ENGLIS H

P.2.5

Arccade St

Urban Design - PlaceMaking & Interpretation

P.3.13 P.3.15

Greenbrier St

i ra yT a ew at

SAIN T PAU L GRAND ROU ND PL ACEMA KI N G AND CO RRI DO R CH A RACT ERI ST ICS P LAN

Placemaking G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

//DRAFT// 12/09/16

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Standard Sign Types PLACEMAKING

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

WAYFINDING

Design Guidelines | 4

Placemaking - Site Furnishings Overview

TRASH RECEPTACLE

Site furnishings provide amenities for Grand Round users by adding functionality and vitality to the pedestrian realm. Site furnishings help to reinforce the Grand Round brand and other placemaking efforts by providing a level of visual detail, color, and use of complementary materials. The following furnishings and materials were chosen for the durability, materials, and colors that honor the history of the Grand Round parkways.

Laser engraved door front on surface mount aluminum litter receptacle, painted brown with color panel backing. Grand Round color can be easily incorporated into this model.

LIGHTING The majority of ‘historic’ light fixtures seen around many of Saint Paul’s roads are single fixture lanterns. The system consists of an octagonal glass-enclosed light mounted on a warm-brown colored decorative pole and stand. The other predominate light fixture along the Grand Round is the standard roadway cobra heads. The City is currently testing LED lights in a number of locations to determine energy savings over the existing high pressure sodium bulbs. In Saint Paul, almost all the lights are mounted on fluted poles and decorative base sleeves set into a below-ground concrete base. There is also an example of lighting installed on stone columns at Mounds Overlook Park which could be repeated at Gateway Nodes.

Holophane Octagonal Lantern Luminarie Style: Arlington Luminarie Mount: Pole Top Pole Height: 12 feet Color: Black Powdercoat

It is important to recognize that all lighting should consider the goals of the Dark Skies Initiative. The Dark Skies Initiative seeks to minimize light pollution’s four components: glare, ground reflection, light trespass, and clutter. Use of shielded lights help preserve the views of the night sky, create energy savings, and reduce impacts on people and wildlife.

Belson Trash Receptacle BRKT32 Size: 42” Accessories: Rain Bonnet and rigid plastic liner Mounting: Surface Mount Color: Black Powdercoat

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Site Furnishings SEATING - STOCK

SEATING - CUSTOM

BIKE RACKS

The ability to rest while walking, running, or biking the Grand Round will be essential. This means providing seating opportunities at key locations along the trail, likely at key trail intersections, in conjunction with other site furnishings, and with wayfinding elements. Currently, seating in Saint Paul parks takes three forms: Saint Paul Parks standard manufactured benches constructed of various materials, artist-created benches, and stone. The advantage of the manufactured benches comes from use of standard replacement parts, ease of installation, and flexibility in available bench forms.

This Kasota stone seat wall is an example of a more durable and natural seating opportunity. This seating type should be considered for use in the Gateway Node areas. The advantage of the stone comes from its durability. It does have a higher maintenance cost in terms of repair than manufactured benches. As noted in the Public Art section above, there is also an opportunity to incorporate art within this type of seat wall

The Grand Round connects users to a variety of adjacent activities so having secure places to lock a bicycle is important. Grand Round logo and color will be incorporated into the model.

Belson Ribbon Bench LB-72 Length: 6 feet Mounting: Surface Mount Color: Black Powdercoat

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Kasota stone with cast stone cap seat wall and colored concrete pavers at Mounds Park Overlook

Dero Bike Hitch Rack with Logo

Dero Bike Hoop Rack with Logo

Capacity: Two bicycles Mounting: Surface Mount Color: Black Powdercoat or Galvanized finish

Design Guidelines | 4

Placemaking - Site Furnishings BIKE REPAIR STATION

DRINKING FOUNTAIN

OTHER LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS Planting Bed Edging

Bike repair stations offer Grand Round users an opportunity to make minor repairs or inflate a tire at various locations along the Grand Round. These stations can also have sponsorship potential.

Ryerson Steel Edging 1/4” x 5”, black enamel paint finish, with 3/16” x 15” stakes Temporary Watering TreeGator Slow-release 15-gallon watering bags http://www.treegator.com Mulch Shredded hardwood bark mulch

Dero Fixit Bike Repair Station Mounting: Surface Mount Color: Black Powdercoat or Galvanized finish

Powder Coat Finish: Black per Manufacturer Model: #410 SM w/Pet Fountain and Surface Carrier Manufacturer: Most Dependable Fountains 1.800.552.6331 www.mostdependable.com

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Site Furnishings GUARDRAIL

METAL RAILS

Typical Grand Round guardrail. 3”x3” Post

Steel Newel post Ball cap Lawler Line No. 133

Standard 42” Pier

4-1/4” O.C. pickets

Post set below frost line

8’ O.C.

Mounting Plate

3’-6”

2’-10 3/4” 3-3/4”

15” 27”

3-5/8” 2”

3”x12” Wood Rail Reinforced with 1/4” Thick 1-1/2”x5” Angle Iron Top and Bottom

8”x8”Wood Post

5’-6” TYP.

2”x2” Bottom Rail

42” Steel Picket Infill

Pickets - 1/2”x1/2” Solid Steel

2”x 2” Top rail

Metal Rail Components

Wood Members ICI Wood Pride Oil Based Semi-transparent Exterior Wood Stain Color: #A0630 (Italian Ochre) Manufacturer: Glidden Professional www.gliddenprofessional.com

Metal Members Powder Coat Finish: Plack Powdercoat Manufacturer: All Powder Paints www.allpowderpaints.com

4’-6”

Pickets - 1/2” x 1/2” solid steel 3”x3” post

3’-10 -3/4”

Guardrail Components

2”

3-5/8” 4-1/4” O.C. pickets

2”x 2” Bottom rail Mounting plate

5’-6” TYP.

54” Steel Picket Guardrail

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Steel Newel post Ball cap Lawler Line No. 133

Design Guidelines | 4

Placemaking - Site Furnishings

22”

18” 24”

Precast Pier and Seatwall Caps Manufacturer: Wausau Tile ( or approved equal) Style: Custom per Construction Details Color: To be approved by owner (should be in the range of natural limestone)

36”

22”

42”

Precast Concrete Cap Limestone Veneer, Ashlar pattern Precast Concrete Base

Grand Round Medallion

Mile Marking

36”-42”

Precast Concrete Cap Limestone Veneer, Ashlar pattern

MILE MARKERS

Recycled Granite Curbing

Saw Cut Line Natural Face

18” 6” 24” Exposed

PIERS

Length Varies 6’-7’

SEAT WALL

3-4’ Buried Stone Wall Cap Lighting LED Undermount Fixture Model #15756SD27 (Wattage to be determined per application, verify model reference #) Manufacturer: Kichler 1.866.558.5706 www.kichler.com

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Public Art

Overview

STORYTELLING THROUGH BIRDS AND MIGRATION

Public Art Goals for the Grand Round

To create a public art plan for the Grand Round with a coherent concept that unites public art across the many neighborhoods through which the route will pass, while also providing an inspirational and experiential metaphor for movement across landscapes, we employ the idea of birds in flight and flyways. The beautiful ease of movement of flying birds inspires all people. That concept will provide some consistent imagery and approaches to public art throughout the Grand Round and inspire an elevated feeling of mobility to our earth-bound species, whether people are walking, biking, rollerblading, driving, or traversing this space using other modes of movement.

The subject of birds and migration offers unique opportunities for the interpretation of cultural and natural history of a site through a specific theme, while allowing for diverse conceptual development. The historic information gathered in the appendix can also inform the design of public art in the Grand Round.

Building upon the theme of Storytelling Through Birds and Migration, the public art goals for the Grand Round are:

Through the use of birds and migration as overarching themes, artwork created for the Grand Round should help create a sense of the Grand Round as a special path within the City, while also helping to illuminate the character of the different neighborhoods the trail traverses. It will provide a distinctive concept and experience to St. Paul’s Grand Round. Other cities have bikeways and pedestrian paths. We will have an inspirational, soaring experience re-enforced by the public art created for our Grand Round.

EXISTING ART IN OR NEAR THE GRAND ROUND

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Specifically birds can represent: •

Cultural identity

•

Mobility and transportation

•

Migration across borders

•

Connection to nature in urban spaces

There are very few public art projects located along the northern portion of the Grand Round. At the western end is Lisa Elias’ “Forged Roots” bench located on Raymond just north of University Avenue. In Phalen Park, Geri Connelly’s “Poetry Post,” and “Book Benches” are visible from the Grand Round route. Some public artworks are nearby, such as carved stone sculptures and stainless steel artworks at Raymond Green Line Station by Myklebust & Sears. Lei Yixin’s “Meditation” is located north of the Grand Round in Phalen Park.

1. Inclusion of larger public artworks at Gateway Nodes. 2. Integrated smaller public artworks with wayfinding and site furnishings as well as smaller art gestures where appropriate. 3. Sites and further possibilities to be defined by the artist. Functional art elements can be placed at the P.1.x & P.2.x locations as well as at the P.3.x markers. Where possible, art elements should be integrated within seatwalls (including carved, cast metal, and precast concrete elements), railings and paving. These art elements can be repeated along the path to effectively create an identity unique to the Grand Round. Other types of Grand Round signature art could include the following:

BRIDGE AND UNDERPASS ART WORKS There are five bridges the Grand Round passes under and each presents an opportunity for light-based artworks to transform these structures (often perceived by residents and trail users as challenges or problems) into assets which help to create a sense of place along the Grand Round. This can be seen in the Case Study at the end of this section.

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Placemaking - Public Art INCORPORATED INTO SITE FURNISHINGS

EARTHWORKS AND PLANTINGS

SIGNATURE GATEWAY ART

Wayfinding art elements may be connected by shared imagery, materials or composition, and are designed to help create a sense of connection between different points on a path, or to identify places to stop, rest, eat, or gather information. Wayfinding art elements can be small elements which repeat along the path.

Limited to non-historic locations with sufficient space, there may be potential to incorporate small earthworks such as mounds, berms, and/or swales into the design vocabulary, either as part of the landscape design or as part of the stormwater design. When coupled with massed plantings, allees and groves, these earthworks can effectively create an outdoor room, a place for gathering, a sheltering spot, or frame a linear path.

Stone seat walls are comparatively small scale and can be created in multiples for use at sites along the Grand Round. While incorporating neighborhood-specific art, it is also important to reinforce the overall wayfinding and branding by creating continuity along the length of the route to celebrate the Grand Round itself. The character of each neighborhood can be incorporated in the pieces, such as through seatwall art, and help to knit together the Grand Round.

Public art can also take the form of street furniture or other functional forms such as bike racks, seating, trash/recycling bins, planters and walls, tree protection, shelters/pavilions, mileage markers, or other functional forms with integrated art potential.

At Gateway nodes, kasota stone seatwalls offer a high potential to incorporate small art elements. For example, inclusions could focus on significant Grand Round story lines, such as natural history, weather, astronomy, geology, transportation, etc. These elements could be cast in bronze, made from precast material such as concrete or clay, hand carved in limestone, or made from cast glass.

Storm King Wave Field, New York by Maya Lin

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Public Art

Suggested Materials for Public Art CONCRETE Concrete elements, either precast or poured-in-place, can render complex surfaces and textures in a durable and cost-effective way, and is an excellent medium for architecturally-integrated art elements. P.1. Gateway Nodes present opportunities for the inclusion of precast or poured-in-place art elements within seatwalls, retaining walls, monument signs, columns, or other elements. Concrete can render complex surfaces and textures in a durable and cost-effective way, extending the reach of a public art budget by generating forms which can be repeated at multiple sites along a path. Using repeated motifs can also aid in wayfinding and in creating a sense of place.

Cast concrete balustrade with sculptural railing by Myklebust + Sears

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

One Saint Paul art project, Marcus Young’s Everyday Poems for City Sidewalks, is expanding the footprint of public art in the city and represent efforts which could be incorporated to good effect in the Grand Round’s paved areas.

Everyday Poems for City Sidewalks

Artist-created decorative paving adds color, texture, and visual interest to an otherwise mundane material

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Placemaking - Public Art Suggested Materials for Public Art

STONE

METALS

The public art pieces are to be created from durable and longlasting materials that are easy to maintain. Currently, architectural elements adjacent to the path of the Grand Round in Como Park include remnants of a native limestone gateway at the intersection of Como and Hamline, limestone fire rings, and a restored/ re-purposed streetcar bridge near this intersection. Limestone retaining walls in Como and Phalen Parks are additional examples of a regionally-sourced architectural/landscape material which can also be used in art applications. Building upon this legacy, the following materials are suggested for use in public art works in the Grand Round corridor.

Native Minnesota Kasota stone is already in broad use along the Grand Round, in both historic and contemporary retaining walls, monument signs, and other elements in Como and Phalen Parks. Granite from Cold Spring, Minnesota is used at the intersection of Summit Avenue and Mississippi River Boulevard, just south of the project area. Regional sandstone is used in the 1895 streetcar bridge in Como park, and the railroad underpass on Johnson. Carved stone elements can be incorporated within seatwalls and other masonry constructions at P.1.x Gateway Nodes. Salvaged granite curbing stone belonging to the City of Saint Paul may present opportunities for cost-effective inclusion of this material in as artist-designed mile/place markers within the Grand Round.

Appropriately designed and finished metals are recommended for use in the Grand Round. Some P.1.x Gateway Nodes may include opportunities for the creation of art railings as parts of overlooks or custom bike racks. Cast bronze elements could be incorporated within seatwalls at Gateway Nodes, or be embedded within pavement as mile/place markers. Schematic lighting design for underpass locations include options for the creation of metal screen artwork as part of the lighting design.

Cast bronze mile marker set in concrete sidewalk

Metal artwork used on wayfinding signage. by Myklebust + Sears

Stone Column at Indian Mounds Park overlook

Carved limestone seat and sculpture, by Myklebust + Sears

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Public Art

Suggested Materials for Public Art LIGHTING Contemporary energy efficient lighting technology, in either static or programmable forms, can be used as an art element to improve the aesthetic experience of a location (underpasses, for example), to increase a sense of safety, or to create responsive artworks which change as people interact with them

LED lighting can also be used to back-light the Grand Round logo at kiosks or incorporated under the seat wall cap or railing to illuminate the paving and provide a warm glow for night-time use.

It is proposed to use contemporary LED lighting technology to bring night-time art into the trail corridor. Light-based artworks can transform an otherwise dark and foreboding space into one that celebrates engineering achievement at each of the five bridges that cross the Grand Round.

LED lighting under wall cap

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

LED backlighting of logo

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Placemaking - Public Art Case Study BRIDGE AND UNDERPASS ART WORKS JOHNSON RR CROSSING Railroad bridges, long a feature throughout Saint Paul, can be reimagined as art pieces. For example, at the railroad bridge that passes over Johnson Parkway, the design concept proposes to illuminate the bridge structure, the stone wall and pathway. This will require attaching fixtures to the existing bridge structure. Interstitial illumination of the rusted bridge structure could be quite extraordinary and turn what is a dark pass through experience into something more thoughful as well as delightful.

Narrow flood LED fixtures mounted in the bridge interstitial space.

RR Track

Horizontal beam Surface mounted or linear LED Cross bracing Johnson Parkway Concept by Myklebust & Sears

Johnson Parkway railroad overpass

Conceptual example of an overpass LED lighting project.

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Trails, Sidewalks, and Roadways Overview The Grand Round pavement can vary, depending upon its location. Paving improvements and markings for in-street bike lanes must meet the criteria noted in the Saint Paul Street Design Manual. The majority of the multi-use trails will be asphalt. Locations adjacent to the trail, such as business districts, parks, and trailto-trail connections, and neighborhood boundaries can benefit from a change in paving type to alert trail users that a wayfinding or decision making opportunity is imminent. Concrete sidewalks are to be provided on both sides of the street to delineate the outer edge of the right-of-way in all residential, commercial and industrial areas.

Pavement treatments vary depending on the type of place function. Grand Round paving options may be selected to create neighborhood-specific identities for gateways, wayfinding kiosks, bike stations, benches, bicycle racks, art, trash cans, and other site furnishings. All paving types must meet ADA-criteria for walking surfaces as well as Saint Paul Street standards for safe winter use and maintenance (i.e. withstand salt and/or deicer).

ADA Treatment, Typ.

Crosswalk Striping

This is the paving material of choice for regional trails in and around Saint Paul. It is a cost-effective and durable material and easy to install. Concrete

Concrete Flatwork Finish: Sand Finish with Tooled Joints Color: To be approved by owner Solomon Colors, Inc. 1.800.624.0261 www.solomoncolors.com

Transition Area

A+B

Bituminous Trail Concrete S

idewalk

Asphalt

This is the paving material of choice for the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s sidewalks, curb and gutters, and curb cuts. It is a durable building material.

Road

Bituminous Trail

TRAIL AND SIDEWALK PAVING MATERIALS

Road Concrete Transition Area Transition Area

Concrete Sidewalk ADA Treatment, Typ.

Crosswalk Treatment

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Sand Finish

Tooled Joint

Design Guidelines | 4

Placemaking - Trails, Sidewalks, and Roadways SPECIAL CONDITIONS Slopes

Protected Pedestrian/Bike Lane at Bridge

The Grand Round path will pass through sloped areas at several locations. For continuity, the design below allows for installation of the asphalt path that addresses stormwater, path stability, and ADA standards.

These are proposed for use at bridges with sufficient width to allow for a raised and separated pedestrian/bike lane. This physical separation gives Grand Round users an additional level of comfort and safety.

1-1/2” Asphalt Surface Course 1-1/2” Asphalt Binder Course 8” Compacted CA-6

Topsoil Backfill 4:1 Max. Slope Undisturbed Soil

Geotextile fabric

2% min. slo

10’ Min. -1

2’ Max

Asphalt Path in Slope

Protected Pedestrian/Bike Lane at Bridge

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Materials Gateway Node Kiosk Finishes

Snap Lock Metal Roof System Englert Series A1100 Panel System Color: Dark Bronze R29.1 E0.9 SRI31 Manufacturer: Englert 1.800.364.5378 www.englertinc.com

Wood finish ICI Wood Pride Oil Based SemiTransparent Exterior Wood Stain Color: #A06030 (Italian Ochre) Manufacturer: Glidden Professional www.gliddenprofessional.com

Photovoltaic lighting system Logo

Steel brackets

Grand Round Logo Finish: Powder Coated Color: PMS#5415 Manufacturer: All Powder Paints www.allpowderpaints.com

Steel Brackets & Mounting Hardware Finish: Powser Coated Color: Bullet Matte Black Manufacturer: All Powder Paints www.allpowderpaints.com

Stone MN Spring Minnesota Spring: Northern Buff (Sizes Vary) or Minnesota Valley: Northern Buff (Sizes Vary) Pattern: Ashlar Joint Finish: Raked Manufacturer: Vetter Stone 1.507.345.4568 www.vetterstone.com

Infill graphics panel Stone MN Valley

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Mortar Color: 10x Light Buff Solomon Colors, Inc 1.800.624.0261 www.solomoncolors.com (or approved equal)

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Placemaking - Gateway Nodes CASE STUDY- PELHAM BOULEVARD AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER BOULEVARD

Gateway Node Type A Partial Seat wall with end columns, Bike Station, Bike Rack, Decorative Paving, Plantings

Gateway Node Type C Full-length Seat wall with end columns, Bike Station, Bike Rack, Decorative Paving, Plantings

Gateway Node Type B Partial Seat wall with end columns, Decorative Fence (where required for protection), Bike Station, Bike Rack, Decorative Paving, Plantings

P.1.X GATEWAY NODES G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

View of proposed Gateway Node Type 2 looking north at Pelham Boulevard and Mississippi River

View of proposed Gateway Node Type 2 looking west at Pelham Boulevard and Mississippi River Boulevard

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Placemaking - Case Study CASE STUDY: GATEWAY TRAIL INTERSECTION The following case studies, along with materials, site furnishings, and landscaping, illustrates the application of the Grand Round Urban Design material palette.

Plaza with Seat Wall, Kiosk, Concrete Pavers, and Fence Gateway State Trail

Sign Blade and Monument Wall

East Wh

eelock

Parkwa y East W heelo

ck Pa

Monument Wall

Gra

nd R

rkwa y

Trail

oun

d Tr ail

Eas

tW hee

lock

Park way Fence

Stone Columns with Lighting

Gran

d Rou

nd Si

dewa

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Placemaking - Case Study

Key Map-Paving/Walls, Etc.

SITE FURNISHINGS KEY MAP - SEE PAGES FOR ay Trail Intersection CORRESPONDING DETAILS

Seatwall 8 pg. 39 Seatwall,

.ctE ,sllaW/gnivaP-paM yeK Gateway Trail

noitcesretnI liarT yawetaG

8 llawtaeS

Kiosk Kiosk Standard Pier 6 pg. 39 Standard Pier,

3Asphalt AsphaltPath, Path

CoCo ncncrereteteSid Sidew ewalk alk

pg. 47

liarT yawetaG

6 Standard Standard Pier, pg.Pier 39

ksoiK

East Wheelock Pa

Sign and Monument Sign and Monument Wall Wall 6 reiP dradnatS

rkway 7 42” 42” pier, pg.Pier 39

7 Pillars with Lighting Pillars with lighting

klawediS

etercnoC

klawediS etercnoC

reiP dradnatS 6

tsaE yawkErasPt kWchoeleeelohcWk Parkway

reiP ”24 7

Grand Round

Grand

4 liaR drauG

lkalk eweaw Sid teteSid e re r c c n n C o C

Round

4 pg. 38 Guard Rail Guard Rail, llaW tnemunoM dna ngiS gnithgiL htiw sralliP

Sign Blade Sign Blade

saE t W h e e l o c k P a r k yaw

dGrand nuoR Round dnarG

arG

dn dnuoR

Path 3 AsphaltPath, Asphalt pg. 47 edalB ngiS

htaP tlahpsA 3

4 pg. 38 Guard FenceRail Guard Rail,

dnuoR dnarG

htaP tlahpsA 3

CCoonncret eteeSSidid ew eawlkalk

4 liaRedcrnaeuFG

42” 42” pier, Pier 7pg. 39

U N D L A N DS CA P E ST RAT EG I ES G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

cnoC

iS eter

klawed

7 reiP ”24

//DRAFT// 01/07/16

Design Guidelines â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 4

Placemaking - Case Study CASE STUDY: WHEELOCK PARKWAY - EDGERTON STREET - PARKWAY

riv D ay

way

Pa r k

elock

Wh e

New Crosswalks, Pedestrian Plazas, Wayfinding Signage, Public Art

Wh e

ound Tra

elock

Pa r k

il Close Parkway Drive, Blade Sign, Small Plaza

way

Wh G ra

Edgerton Street

G ra n d R

eel

ock

Pa r

k wa

dT ra i

k wa

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Wayfinding Overview Wayfinding consists of signage and other visual cues (logos, colors, shapes) that reassure users they are on the desired route. A successful wayfinding system for the Grand Round will provide visual continuity, convey a better understand of familiar environments, and direct users to new exploration opportunities throughout Saint Paul. A quality wayfinding system is built upon signage type and readability.

SIGNAGE TYPES: There are three wayfinding sign categories proposed for the Grand Round. Each category contributes to the overall function of signage on the Grand Round and provides users with key guidance. See page 34 for images of wayfinding sign types. 1.

Decision-Making: Major & Minor

Decision-making signs are used to provide directions, locations, or distances to destinations. Some signs will serve vehicular traffic needs with text sized and message content adjusted to be easily readable from a moving vehicle and will be applied along the roadway and at intersections. Pedestrian and cycling directional information text and graphics will be applied along sidewalks and off road trails, offering more detailed posted information descriptions. These signs provide information that directs people to destinations such as businesses, restrooms, parks, etc. • •

Maps – Where are we? Where can I find ...? Mileage - How far are we from ...?

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

2. Identity Identity signs provide specific place names along the Grand Round route. These signs may include favorite destinations, parks, trails, and neighborhoods. The use of the Grand Round logo and color scheme on these signs provides visual continuity and user reassurance that they are on the Grand Round. 3. Interpretive and Rules Interpretive signs provide desired information about the Grand Round and the neighborhoods it connects. Interpretive signage can vary in form from a single or double-sided stand-alone sign to the larger four-panel kiosk shown on page 49. They should be placed in clear view of the trail users yet not interfere with the other signage. Interpretive signs should cover the historic, cultural and archeological stories of interest to both residents and visitors. • •

Interpretative – sharing stories (mostly at the Gateway Kiosks) Rules - The do’s and don’t’s of the Grand Round (similar to those at city parks)

Design Guidelines | 4 ENGLIS H

W.3.32

Ve W.2.14 ce

e Av ity r W.1.9 pe os Pr u

Hamline-Midway

406

Thomas-Dale(Frogtown) UN

Smith Ave

Western Ave

W.2.19

W.2.18

IGHT

MINNEH AHA

W.3.38

W.3.____ Reinforcement / “Trail Blazing” / Operational X W.1.____ Existing Signage X Grand Round signs will be installed at all intersections along the corridor. (Typically on street lights and other Grand Round amenities)

W.3.41

W.3.42 Dayton's Bluff

Indian Mound Trail

W.1.10

W.1.11

R WA

416

Battle Creek-Highwood

See Placemaking & Wayfinding matrix on page 116 for more information.

415

do Ra n

414

RANDOLPH

407Euclid St

Jefferson Ave W.2.27

OG G

KEL L

IL L

TE TA

H IG

B WA

W.2.17

SUMMIT

412

W.1.12

Summit Hill

t nS so ck t St er

s ba Wa

Summit-University

Summit Ave

W.3.36 W.3.37

W.3.39

410

409

Merriam Park/Lexington-Hamline

L EN

Reaney Ave

W.3.40

b Ro

408

PH A

TY SI

Downtown

Macalester-Groveland

X W.2.____ Minor Decision Point

Margaret St W.2.16

W.3.1

AY D

X W.1.____ Major Decision Point

W.3.34 W.3.35

UNIVERS ITY

411

WAYFINDING

W.3.33

East 7th Street

CO M

W.2.29 W.2.28

Type – Wayﬁnding (W) Hierarchy designation Location designation – see detailed map and location schedule

W.1.2

W.2.15

H 7T

W.2.30

Arccade St

r rook T Trout B

Edgerton St

403

o nt

Typical Key:

l ai Tr

MCK N

405

W.1.1 Marshall Ave

W.1.8

404

Greater East Side

W.2.12

PIERCE B UTLER

CLE VELAND

W.3.30

W.2.13

Payne-Phalen

Pelham Ave

402

North End

Hamline Ave

o R aym n d Av e

W.3.2

W.3.31

W.3.28

W.3.22

W.1.5 W.3.15 W.3.18 W.3.17 W.3.19, 20, 21 W.1.3

COMO

W.3.8,W.3.10 W.2.5 W.3.13 UW.3.9 ofM Transit w W.2.2 W.2.1 W.3.7 W.3.6 W.3.5

UW.3.4 niv ers ity Av e W.3.3

W.2.10

W.2.7

Lake Phalen

W.3.29

PAYNE

W.2.4

Dr W.2.3 ive

W.3.16

Pa rk

W.3.11 W.3.12 W.2.6 W.3.14

L EGEN D

LA RPENTEUR

I 35E

400

UofM Saint Paul CampusW.1.2

rgy

W.2.11

W.3.25 I35E W.3.27 W.1.6 W.1.7

Av e

En e

W.1.4

W.2.9 W.2.8

Lexington Ave

St. Anthony Park

Lake Como

Rice St

Snelling Ave

State Fair Grounds

West Side

West Seventh W.2.20 Highland Pkwy

Otto Ave

ANNAP OLIS

W.2.25 Ford Pkwy W.2.24 H 7T

W.1.15

H OM

Highland

il ra lT ai R rdW.1.13 Fo

413

NORTH

W.2.22

ge Br id

W.2.21 St

Davern St

on Aft

W.1.14

W.2.26

W.3.6

401

Dale St

Como

HOY T

W.3.26

W.3.24

W.3.23

Greenbrier St

ai Tr ay w te

SAINT PAU L G RA ND ROU ND WAYF I N DI N G PLAN

Wayfinding //DRAFT// 12/09/16

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

4 | D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

Wayfinding READABILITY: Signage needs to be easily readable from a variety of users moving at a variety of speeds, such as automotive vehicles, bicycles, joggers, pedestrians, and bench sitters. Signage needs to clearly communicate a desired message on a sign template appropriately sized for its surrounding conditions. Readability hinges on five factors: 1.

Dimensions

Message length greatly affects the sign size. Message phrasing to minimize the number of characters allows for smaller sized signs and room for logo. Appropriate font type and font size may also reduce the overall dimensions of a sign. The scale, style, and durability of the signs should fit within the context of their location. The following should be considered when planning the design of a sign system:

2. Location

4. Message

Sign locations need to balance the sign size, the number of signs, and the regulatory requirements without overwhelming the Grand Round user. It is important to avoid visual clutter since too much signage overwhelms the intended user and is no longer effective.

Signs for interpretive stories and messages should be scaled to fit their location and content length. All messaging will be reviewed by the City of Saint Paul for content, accuracy, and appropriateness. Size and location of signs must balance the need to be large enough to be read without being a visual distraction. Message content will vary depending upon intent and location so brand consistency will be conveyed through design features and the use of the Grand Round logo and color palette.

•

Quantity – signs spaced appropriately to allow for visual connectivity from sign to sign. Grand Round trail signs should be spaced based on visual connectivity. However, a minimum of 300 feet to a maximum of 600 feet apart will allow users to locate, read, comprehend, and react to the signs. Surroundings – quick visual identification is important, so avoid placing signs where they may be blocked by vegetation and landforms, built features such as buildings and bridges, and other existing signage, both regulatory and private.

•

Visual continuity (font size and style, contrasts, colors, sign shape)

•

Use of Grand Round logo and color palette on all non- regulatory signage

Signs should be mounted at a uniform height by type when possible for consistency and easier recognition by Grand Round users. These signs can be mounted in a variety of ways:

•

Use of maps and other orientation and information resources at kiosks

•

Free-standing pole-mounted, either using City-standard poles

• • • •

for regulatory signs or larger steel pipe poles painted in the Grand Round color palette for directional blade signage. Attached to light poles To overpass abutments or spans (both vehicle and train bridges) Mounted to walls or fences From existing overhead traffic control structures and signage

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Mounting Location

5. Language While the bulk of the signage will be in English, use of universal pictograms will aid both English and non-English speaking locals and visitors in using the Grand Round. Sports pictograms are currently in use at Saint Paul Park signage and can easily be expanded to include services and directional information throughout the Grand Round.

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

â&#x20AC;&#x160;â&#x20AC;&#x2030;| 5

The following pages highlight recommendations for each part of the Grand Round. These maps show the locations of new bike trail alignments, existing and new sidewalks, existing bike/shared use trails, crosswalks, and raised crosswalks.

0 50 100 MAP KEY

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

Raised Crossing

890

1.X Gateway Node

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

Raymond Exist. Sidewalk Ave

Placemaking

Av e

New Bike Trail

! ?

Cross-sections give a general representation of the proposed changes, showing the width of the right-of-way, as well as road, trail, and sidewalk dimensions.

Feet

LEGEND

Red dots represent Ash Trees in the public right-of-way that have the potential to be removed due to the invasive Emerald Ash Borer. Each Placemaking (blue circle) and Wayfinding (red square) location is given a number and located on the following maps. The Placemaking and Wayfinding Matrix follows the maps and goes into greater detail what occurs at each location.

200

3.X Corridor Marker

1.X

WayďŹ nding

nth on y

900

NORTH

1.X Major Decision Point

Crosswalk

2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree

Road Closure

Sa int A

Roadway improvements are also shown as well as those roads that are proposed to be closed. 890

Glendale St

Cross Section Figure Number

870

880

890

Grand Round Plan Recommendations

880

Pillsbury St

USING THESE MAPS

880

W Beverly Rd

880

5 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Doane Ave

860

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

â&#x20AC;&#x160;â&#x20AC;&#x2030;| 5

Map 1 - Pelham Boulevard Mississippi River Boulevard to West Beverly Road Existing Conditions Pelham Boulevard between Mississippi River Boulevard and West Beverly Road is characterized as a naturalistic corridor that is flanked on both sides by tree lined - wide boulevards, sidewalks along the westerly side of Pelham Boulevard and single family homes. The adjacent area between Otis Avenue and West Beverly Road on the easterly side of Pelham Boulevard is a private golf course and currently does not have sidewalk within the boulevard area. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

will also be analyzed for a potential reconfiguration to improve safety at the intersection.

The roadway is an existing 36 foot wide roadway with a parkway width of 120 feet. Pelham Boulevard is currently designated as a Municipal State Aid roadway. On-street parking exists on both sides of the roadway between Mississippi River Boulevard and Otis Avenue and then only on the west side from Otis Avenue to West Beverly Road.

Wayfinding Improvements

A tabled crossing for the trail will be installed across Otis Avenue and West Beverly Road. The roadway is planned without parking however, parking will also be reviewed within this phase. Storm water issues will also be addressed, such as providing treatment within the boulevard area between the roadway and bike trail. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights.

Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Pelham Boulevard. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A Gateway Node (P.1.1) is programed on the south side of Mississippi River Boulevard at Pelham Avenue. The Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map panels, seating, bike repair station, potential drinking fountain, waste receptacles, and public art. A corridor marker is also programed for the northwest corner of this intersection. This node can be constructed independently of any work on Pelham Boulevard. The open area on the northwest corner of North Pelham Boulevard and West Desnoyer Street provides an opportunity for creating a parklet for use as a rest area, community gardens, or for storm water best management practices; this is identified as P.2.1 on the plan.

a sidewalk to the easterly side of Pelham Boulevard. A formally marked crosswalk will also be added across Mississippi River Boulevard. The intersection of Otis Avenue and Pelham Boulevard G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

0 50 100

April 18, 2016

er S t

sno y De W

880

on t

820

Cromwell Ave 840

ve A is Ot

890

1.3, 1.4

Desnoyer Park

88 0

Doane Ave

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

Raymond Exist. Sidewalk Ave Crosswalk

890

Proposed Roadway

! ?

890

Mr aap G nd1 R o-u P n delham Design B &oulevard I m p l e m e n tat M i o ississippi n P l a n R| iver A p rBioulevard l 2016 to W est B everly R oad ++

Pillsbury St

Raised Crossing

Ash Tree

Road Closure

Placemaking 1.X Gateway Node

Av e

New Bike Trail

890

LEGEND

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

200

Feet

3.X Corridor Marker

1.X

Wayﬁnding

1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point

Sa int A

890

0 50 100 MAP KEY

82 0

900

NORTH

3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

83 0

W Beverly Rd

89 0

880

890

Glendale St

nth on y

830

880

890

? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ! ?

> > > > >

> > >

860 880 870

? !

> >

> > > > >

N Pelham Blvd

CeOc

> > > > >

> > >

> >

> > > > >

> > >

ve A is Ot

AcAut AcAut QuBi QuMa CeOc QuRu CeOc CeOc QuBi AcPlEQ AcAut QuRu CeOc AcAut CeOc CeOc QuBi AcPlEQ CeOc CeOc AcPlEQ AcAut CeOc QuRu QuBi AcPlEQ AcAut 8 AcPlEQ UlAmPr AcSn AcSn 80 TiAm AcSa TiAm JuNi UlAmPr TiAm UlAmPr AcPlEQ UlAmPr JuNi QuMa UlPu AcPlEQ TiAm QuBi AcRuRe QuMa

N Pelham Blvd UlAmVF AcRuRe

860

850

> >> > > > >

AcPlEQ AcPlEQ UlAmVF AcPl AcPl AcPlEQ AcPlEQ UlAmVF UlAmVF AcRuRe 8AcPl 50 AcPlEQ UlAmVF AcPl UlAm PiRe AcRuRe 3.1

>> >

N Pelham Blvd

2.1 AcAut AcPlEQ AcAut AcPlEQ AcPlEQ AcPlEQ AcAut AcPlEQ AcPlEQ AcPlEQ

84>0

> >

AcPlEQ AcPlEQ AcPlEQ AcPlEQ AcPlEQ

> > >

AcPlEQ

PiSy

AcPlEQ

> > > > ?> !

> > > >

AcAut PiSy MaSpRJ

> >

AcPlEQ AcPlEQ AcPlEQ QuMa AcPl

AcSa

83 0

1.1

AcPlEQ QuRu AcPlEQ AcPlEQ AcPlEQ

88 0

73 0

840

1.1, 1.2

AcAut AcSa

ust is S

81 0

840

810

0 74 0 77 0 79

800

0 81

760

iR p ip ss i s is

e iv

l B r

200

Feet

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

0 75 80 7

Map 1 Pelham Boulevard Mississppi River Boulevard to Doane Ave_v25

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

| 5

Map 1 - Pelham Boulevard Mississippi River Boulevard to West Beverly Road

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

5’

37’

12’

traffic buffer cycle lane track

boulevard

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

2’

42’

5’

37’

12’

10’

120’ right-of-way

Pelham Boulevard Figure 1.1 Mississippi River Boulevard to Otis Avenue

traffic buffer cycle lane track

boulevard

2’

42’

12’

10’

120’ right-of-way

Pelham Boulevard Figure 1.3 Otis Avenue to Doane Avenue - Cycle Track Improvements

Cycle Track Improvements

Figure 1.1 N Pelham Blvd – Mississippi River Blvd to Otis Ave: Cycle Track Improvements

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

5’

32’

13’

Figure 1.3 N Pelham Blvd – Otis Ave to Doane Ave: Cycle Track Improvements

traffic buffer bike lane trail

13’

2’ 10’

side walk

boulevard

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

5’

40’

5’

37’

13’

right-of-way Pelham Boulevard Figure 1.2 M120’ ississippi R iver B oulevard to O tis A venue

Roadway Improvements Figure 1.2 N Pelham Blvd – Mississippi River Blvd to Otis Ave: Roadway Improvements

blvd bike trail

5’

120’ right-of-way

10’

boulevard

side walk

varies

5’

Pelham Boulevard Figure 1.4 Otis Avenue to Doane Avenue - Roadway Improvements G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

Figure 1.4 N Pelham Blvd – Otis Ave to Doane Ave: Roadway Improvements

5 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 2 - Pelham Boulevard West Beverly Road to Myrtle Avenue Existing Conditions Pelham Boulevard between West Beverly Road and Doane Avenue is characterized as a naturalistic corridor; however the area north of the I94 Bridge changes to the designed corridor as it approached Raymond / University Avenue area. The roadway between West Beverly Road and West Saint Anthony Avenue is flanked on both sides by tree lined - wide boulevards, sidewalks along both sides of Pelham Boulevard and single family homes. A sidewalk exists along the west side of Pelham Boulevard, between West Saint Anthony Avenue and Myrtle Avenue and along the east side for approximately 300 feet south of Myrtle Avenue. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. The roadway between West Beverly Road and Doane Avenue is an existing 36 foot wide roadway with a parkway width of 120 feet. Pelham Boulevard between Doane Avenue and I94 Bridge is a 44 foot wide roadway with a parkway width of 120 feet. The area from the I94 Bridge and Myrtle Avenue is a 44 foot wide roadway with a parkway width of 66 feet. On-street parking within this section exists on both sides between West Beverly Road and Myrtle Avenue, with the exception over the I94 Bridge. Pelham Boulevard is currently designated as a Municipal State Aid roadway.

Prelham Wpest G a n d R o uB n oulevard d Design & Im l e mBeeverly n tat i R o oad n P lto a nM|yrtle A p rA i lvenue 2016

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Planned improvements can be completed in two phases: Cycle Track Improvements includes placing a cycle track along the easterly side of Pelham Boulevard. This improvement will be completed by restriping the roadway for a two-lane roadway without on-street parking from West Beverly Road to Doane Avenue; on-street parking will remain on the west side from Doane Avenue to the I94 Bridge. The cycle track will be buffered by a two to four foot striped area from West Beverly Road to Myrtle Avenue and will include flexible delineators. Future Roadway Improvements includes reconstructing the roadway to 26 feet wide (24 feet wide if the Municipal State Aid designation is removed), creating an off-road trail and adding a sidewalk to the easterly side of Pelham Boulevard from West Beverly Road to Doane Avenue and then a 32 foot wide roadway from Doane Avenue to Myrtle Avenue. A tabled crossing for the trail will be installed across Doane Avenue and West Saint Anthony Avenue. This improvement will be completed by restriping the roadway for a two-lane roadway without on-street parking from West Beverly Road to Doane Avenue; on-street parking will remain on the west side from Doane Avenue to the Myrtle Avenue; except over the I94 Bridge. However, parking will also be reviewed during this phase. Storm water issues will also be addressed, such as providing treatment within the boulevard area between the roadway and bike trail. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights.

Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Pelham Boulevard. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements An interpretive node (P.2.2) is programmed for the northwest corner of West Saint Anthony Avenue and Pelham Boulevard. Public art and corridor marker (P.3.1) is also suggested to be infused with any future I-94 bridge rehabilitation.

880

870

tena

0 88

84 0

G R A N D R O U N D P L A N R E CO M M E N DAT I O N S NORTH

0 50 100

870

0 86

| 5

200

Feet

MAP KEY

880

LEGEND EĞǁ ŝŬĞ dƌĂŝů

0 85

Placemaking

1.X

ExŝƐƚ͘ ŝŬĞͬ^ŚĂƌĞĚ UsĞ dƌĂŝů

Ϯ͘ǆ /ŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƟǀĞ EŽĚĞ

EĞǁ ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬ

ve Ave ellll A e ! ?

2.1, 2.2

2.3, 2.4

ϭ͘y DĂũŽƌ ĞĐŝƐŝŽŶ WŽŝŶƚ

ƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬ

Ϯ͘y DŝŶŽƌ ĞĐŝƐŝŽŶ WŽŝŶƚ

WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ZŽĂĚǁĂǇ

ϯ͘y ZĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ

Ash Tree

ƌŽƐƐ ^ĞĐƟŽŶ Figure Number

880

890

tĂǇĮŶĚŝŶŐ

1.X

Raised Crossing

0 85

1.3, 1.4

ϯ͘y ŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ DĂƌŬĞƌ

ǆŝƐƚ͘ ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬ

0 88

Crr C

ϭ͘y 'ĂƚĞǁĂǇ EŽĚĞ

880

AcRuAS

0 88

870

ve Ave A

AcPlCo

UlJa

AcPlCo

UlJa UlJa

MaSpp M aSpp

Myy M

880

MaSpp

ve Ave sh A ash a

89 0

! ?

> AcPlCo > AcRuAS AcPlCo AcRuAS AcPlCo AcRuAS

ve Ave eA ne oan Doa D

N Pelham Blvd > > > >

? !

! ?

am B ham Pelh lvd Blvd N Pe

> AcPlCo > AcPlCo

? !

? ! ! ?

880

3.1

> >

2.2

! ?

CeOc C Oc

! ?

! ? ! ? ! ? ? ! ? !

> > > > >

> > >

> >

CeOc CeOc

! ? ? ! ! ? ? !

N Pelham P Blvd

CeOc CeOc CeOc CeO Oc

! ?

> > > > >

> > >

> >

QuMa QuBi Qu CeOcc CeOc QuRu CeOc CeOc QuBi QuRu CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc QuRu QuBi QuBi CeOc CeOc AcPlEQ cPlEQ cPlEQ PlEQ Q QuBi Q Bi QuRu QuRu 80 TiAm AcSn A S T Am mQuMa 8 AcSn A S QuMa M TiAm AcPlEQ cPlEQ PlEQ TiAm UlAmPr UlAmPr JuNi TiAm TiAm TiAm QuMa UlPu QuMa UlP u JuN i JuNi QuBi

AcAut ut

87 0

Desnoyer Park Desnoy

MaSpp MaSp pp

880

TiCoG Gr TiCoGr TiCoG Gr TiCoGr

TiCoGr TiCoG Gr

0r 890 8 TiC o9G TiCoGr

89 0

60 890

Av e

nth Sa W

AcPl cPl > A

St y St

CeOc

! ?

SyRe yRe >S

ill Pill P

CeOc

> >

SyRe yRe >S SyRe yRe >S >S SyRe yRe >S SyRe yRe SyRe yRe >S

MAP 2 - PELHAM BOULEVARD WEST BEVERLY ROAD TO MYRTLE AVENUE

CeOc

890

Ave d Av

ay Ray R

Stt S

0 89

G R A N D R O U N D D E S I G N & I M P L E M E N TAT I O N P L A N | A P R I L 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 2 - Pelham Boulevard West Beverly Road to Myrtle Avenue

Pelham Boulevard Figure 2.3 I-94 Bridge to Myrtle Avenue Cycle Track Improvements

Cycle Track Improvements

10’

8’

7’

860

850 85 0

66’ right-of-way 860

200 Feet

900

89 0

11’

100

NORTH

10’

7’

5’ Feet

MAP KEY

LEGEND 870

5’

N Eustis St

blvd side walk

200

cycle track

890 890

880

N Eustis St

890

yA ve

120’ right-of-way

870

890

rsit

West St. Anthony Avenue

traffic lane

April 18, 2016

ive

42’

10’

side blvd parking traffic walk lane lane

Map 3 Raymond Ave Myrtle Ave to Long_v25

Figure 2.1 Doane Avenue to

2’

12’

Pelham Boulevard

New Bike Trail Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

0 50 100

1.X

Raised Crossing Crosswalk

d lR

890

Te rr W

TiCoGr

Lo ng Av e

Ellis Ave

sA ve

TiCoGr TiCoGr

ive Un W

Ch arle

yA ve

890 TiCoGr

rsit

89 0

ad fo r

AcPlCo

900

> >

> > >

> >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

3.5

> >

> > >

Roadway Improvements

900

Figure 2.2 N Pelham Blvd – Doane Ave to W Saint Anthony Ave: Roadway Improvements

5’

GlTrSh

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

varies

West St. Anthony Avenue

GlTrSh

10’

Figure 2.2 Doane Avenue to

UlPa

Raymond Ave Raymond Ave > >

5’

side walk

UlPa

13’

120’ right-of-way

boulevard

UlPa

13’

blvd bike trail

UlPa

37’

traffic lane

GlTrSh

3.4

? !

5’

traffic lane

AcAut

? !

AcPl AcPl

? !

> AcPl

! ?

3.3

3.4

? !

SyRe SyRe

> >

> SyRe

boulevard

UlAmNH UlAmNH UlAmNH AcPlCl 910 AcPl TiSpp UlAmNH AcPlCo TaSpp UlAmNH UlAmNH AcSn AcRu 3.5 AcSa UlAmNH UlAmNH UlJa AcPlCo AcPlCo UlJa AcPlCo UlJa UlJa AcPlCo AcPlCo UlJa MaAd MaAd UlJa UlJa AcPlCo MaAd MaAd MaAd MaAd AcPlCo MaAd

CeOc CeOc

3.3

UlPa

AcPlSu

3.3

> > > > > >

CeOc CeOc

90 0

900

CeOc CeOc

> >

> SyRe > SyRe > SyRe > SyRe > SyRe

0 8990

side walk

90 0

South St Anthony Park

Hu nt

900

Raymond Av e

Roadway Improvements

Pelham Boulevard

90 0

! ? MaSpp MaSpp

880 880

0 89

3.1, 3.2

900

Ave Ave Myrtle Myrtle Ave Myrtle

MaSpp MaSpp

ito ria

880

UlJa

AcPlCo

UlJa UlJa

AcRuAS

3.2 MaSpp 3.2 MaSpp

Glendale St

Myrtle Avenue

N Pelham Pelham Blvd Blvd N

! ?

AcPlCo

AcRuAS AcPlCo

AcRuAS AcPlCo AcRuAS

Wabash Ave

AcPlCo

87 0

! ?

> > > > > >

> AcPlCo > AcPlCo

880

> >

0 88

Figure 2.4 I-94 Bridge to

Cross Section Figure Number

Bayless Pl

880

Pelham Boulevard

1.X Major Decision Point 3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree Road Closure

N Pelham Blvd

1.X Gateway Node

Wayﬁnding 2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

Figure 2.1 N Pelham Blvd – Doane Ave to W Saint Anthony Ave: Cycle Track Improvements

Placemaking

3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk

Cromwell Ave

200

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

880

12’

boulevard

87 0

37’

traffic buffer cycle lane track

5’

traffic lane

890

boulevard

0 88

side walk

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 3 - Raymond Avenue

â&#x20AC;&#x160;â&#x20AC;&#x2030;| 5

Myrtle Avenue to Long Avenue

Existing Conditions Myrtle Avenue and Raymond Avenue between Pelham Boulevard and West Territorial Road is characterized as a designed corridor. Raymond Avenue between West Territorial Road and Long Avenue is characterized as a formal corridor. Myrtle Avenue and Raymond Avenue is flanked on both sides by sidewalks with boulevards and some over-story trees. The existing street lighting south of University Avenue has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting; as the street lighting north of University Avenue was updated with the recent roadway reconstruction.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Due to the cost of rehabilitating Myrtle Avenue the planned improvements are proposed to be completed in two phases: Cycle Track Improvements includes placing a cycle track along the northerly side of Myrtle Avenue. This improvement will be completed by restriping the roadway for a two-lane roadway; parking will be removed from the roadway. The cycle track will be buffered by a two-to-four foot striped area with flexible delineators.

Myrtle Avenue between Pelham Boulevard and Raymond Avenue is an existing 41 foot wide roadway with a right-of-way width of 66 feet. Raymond Avenue between Myrtle Avenue and University Avenue is a 44 foot wide roadway with a right-of-way width of 66 feet. On-street parking along Myrtle Avenue is allowed along the entire north side and is limited along the south side to the westerly end; parking along Myrtle is not metered. On-street parking exists on both sides of Raymond Avenue and is metered parking.

Myrtle Avenue Improvements includes reconstructing the roadway to 31 feet wide, creating an off-road trail along the north side.

Raymond Avenue from University Avenue to Long Avenue was reconstructed in the past few years and has an existing roadway width of 44 feet with a right-of-way width of 66 feet. The roadway is a two lane roadway with bike lanes striped on both sides. On-street parking exists on both sides to Elis Avenue and then only on the east side from Elis Avenue to Long Avenue. Metered parking exists along Raymond Avenue from University Avenue to Territorial Road. Un-metered parking exists from Territorial Road to Long Avenue.

No physical improvements are planned north of north of University Avenue due to the narrow right-of-way and recent reconstruction of Raymond Avenue. The recent reconstruction did include both sidewalks and bike lanes.

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A corridor marker sign (P.3.2) will be placed at the southeast corner of Pelham Boulevard and Myrtle Avenue to identify Pelham Boulevard. A corridor marker sign (P.3.3) will also be placed at the southeast corner of Raymond Avenue and Myrtle Avenue to identify Raymond Avenue. These signs might need to be reduced in size due to the space restrictions within the corridor.

Sidewalks will remain on both sides of the roadway. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Raymond Avenue Improvements south of University Avenue include restriping the roadway to include two five foot bike lanes to University Avenue.

Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Raymond Avenue from Myrtle Avenue to Como Avenue.

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

200

890

200 Feet

890

900

89 0

890

0 88

880

NORTH

N Eustis St

yA ve

870

890

100

rsi t

LEGEND

ive Un

850 85 0

87 0

860

New Bike Trail Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

0 50 100

1.X

Raised Crossing Crosswalk

90 0

! ?

Cross Section Figure Number

Myrtle Avenue

890

900

Te rr

South St Anthony Park

Hu nt

900

CeOc CeOc

TiCoGr

Lo ng Av e

Ellis Ave

TiCoGr TiCoGr

rsi t

Av e

890 TiCoGr

ive

Un W

Ch arl es

yA ve

89 0

ad fo r

900

> >

> > >

> >

3.5

> >

> > > > > >

900

> > >

GlTrSh

> > > > >

GlTrSh

UlPa

Raymond Ave Raymond Ave > >

M Myrtle Alvenue Avenue G r ap a n d3 R o-uR n daymond D e s i g n &A I mvenue p l e m e n tat ion P a n | to A pLrong i l 2016

0 8990

UlPa

GlTrSh

Myrtle Avenue to W University Avenue

? !

3.4

UlPa

AcAut

? !

AcPl AcPl

? !

> AcPl

! ?

? !

> SyRe

> SyRe > SyRe > SyRe > SyRe > SyRe

3.3

? !

> >

SyRe SyRe

3.4

UlAmNH UlAmNH UlAmNH AcPlCl AcPl TiSpp UlAmNH AcPlCo TaSpp UlAmNH UlAmNH AcSn AcRu 3.5 AcSa UlAmNH UlAmNH UlJa AcPlCo AcPlCo UlJa UlJa AcPlCo UlJa AcPlCo AcPlCo UlJa MaAd MaAd UlJa UlJa AcPlCo MaAd MaAd MaAd MaAd AcPlCo MaAd

910

AcPlCo

CeOc CeOc

Raymond Av e

3.3

UlPa

AcPlSu

3.3

> > > > > >

CeOc CeOc

90 0

900

Ave Ave Myrtle Myrtle Ave Myrtle

3.1, 3.2

Glendale St

90 0

880 >

MaSpp MaSpp

0 89

ito ria l

AcRuAS

AcPlCo

UlJa

AcPlCo

UlJa UlJa

AcRuAS AcPlCo AcRuAS

Wabash Ave

! ? ! ?

> AcPlCo > AcRuAS AcPlCo

> > > >

880

87 0

> >

> > AcPlCo > AcPlCo

0 88

888800

1.X Major Decision Point

Bayless Pl

880

N Pelham Pelham Blvd Blvd N

MaSpp MaSpp

Wayﬁnding

3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree Road Closure

3.2 MaSpp 3.2 MaSpp

1.X Gateway Node

2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

N Pelham Blvd

Placemaking

3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk

Cromwell Ave

200

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

880

860

Feet

MAP KEY

870

Map 3 Raymond Ave | Myrtle G r aAve n d toRLong_v25 ound Plan R e co m2016 m e n dat i o n s April 18,

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

side walk

blvd

cycle track

buffer

5’

10’

10’ 2’

traffic lane

blvd

12’

9’

side walk

5’ 1’

side walk

blvd

bike lane

blvd

5’

9’

10’ 4’

traffic lane

blvd

12’

8’

side walk

5’ 1’

side walk

blvd

parking bike lane lane

traffic lane

bike parking lane lane

blvd

side walk

6’

12’

6’ 5’

11’

5’ 6’

12’

6’

66’ right-of-way

| 5

80’ right-of-way

Figure 3.3 Raymond Ave – Myrtle Ave to W University Ave

Myrtle Avenue

Figure 3.1 North Pelham Boulevard to

Raymond Avenue - Cycle Track Improvements

Myrtle Avenue

Figure 3.2 North Pelham Boulevard to

Raymond Avenue - Roadway Improvements

Raymond Avenue

Figure 3.3 Myrtle Avenue to West

University Avenue

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 4 - Raymond Avenue Long Avenue to Energy Park Drive Existing Conditions

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements

Raymond Avenue between Pelham Boulevard and Como Avenue is characterized as a formal corridor. Raymond Avenue continues to be flanked on both sides with boulevards, trees within the boulevards, and sidewalks. Street lighting has been updated to the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

An interpretive node is programmed for the east end of Hampden Park. This node can be constructed independently of any work on Raymond Avenue. A corridor marker sign (P.3.4) will also be placed on the northeast corner of Raymond Avenue and West Hampden Avenue.

Raymond Avenue from Long Avenue to Hampden Avenue was reconstructed in the past few years and has a varying roadway width due to a center median. The roadway within this area is a one-way roadway with existing bike lanes on both sides and no onstreet parking. Raymond Avenue from Hampden Avenue to Robbins Street is a 44 foot wide roadway with a right-of-way width of 66 feet. The roadway is a two lane roadway with bike lanes striped on both sides. On-street parking exists on the west side of Raymond Avenue from Hampden Avenue to Manvel Street. No on-street parking is provided from Manvel Street to Energy Park Drive to the north.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Due to the narrow right-of-way and recent reconstruction of Raymond Avenue, which included both sidewalks and bike lanes, no physical improvements are planned in this study. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Raymond Avenue from Myrtle Avenue to Como Avenue. Directional signs will also be placed for connections to the Inter Campus Transit Way via Robbins Street and also to Hampden Park. Figure 4.1 Raymond Blvd – Elis Ave to Long Ave

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

side walk

blvd

bike lane

traffic lane

bike lane

parking lane

blvd

side walk

6’

5’

6’

11’

6’

10’

5’

6’

side walk

blvd

parking lane

bike lane

traffic lane

bike lane

blvd

side walk

6’

5’

10’

6’

11’

6’

5’

6’

66’ right-of-way

Raymond Avenue

Figure 4.1 Ellis Avenue to Long Avenue

Raymond Avenue

Figure 4.2 Raymond Blvd – W Hampden Ave to Robbins St

Figure 4.2 West Hampden Avenue to Robbins Street

200 Feet

0 89

t sS

920

90 0

In Tr ter a

NORTH

0 90

900

mp Ha

on m y Ra

900

910 2.1

> >

ve dA

910

3.7

Ave d n mo

Ray

> > >

> > > > > >

AcMi UlMG AcMi TiAmLe AcMi AcMi UlPa UlPa UlPa UlPa UlPa UlPa AcPlCo AcPlCo CeOc

AcPlSu UlAmNH AcPlCl 3.4 TiSpp UlAmNH UlAmNH

SyRe SyRe

2.3

4.1

AcPlCo AcPlCo AcPlCo AcPlCo

South St Anthony Park

AcSn

Ba yle

4.2

n d Pl

Ba yle

t sS

900

920

ym o

92 0

Road Closure

nP ark

Cross Section Figure Number

Ha m

3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree

ns St

pd e

2.X Minor Decision Point

Manvel St

nA ve

0 90

1.X Major Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

! ?

Wayﬁnding

Crosswalk

900

Ba y

91 3.X Corridor Marker 0

1.X

Raised Crossing

e Av

les

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

Exist. Sidewalk

Placemaking

Robbi

90 0

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail New Sidewalk

900

Pe ar

we ll A ve

890

New Bike Trail

91 0

r Energy P a rk D

LEGEND

200

Feet

MAP KEY

0 50 100

| 5

us mp y Ca Wa it ns

100

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

April 18, 2016

900

ti us

200

Map 4 Raymond Ave Long Ave to Energy Park Drive_v25

3.6

900

C ett r e v

d pR

0 89

UlJa UlJa UlAmNH UlJa UlJa UlJa UlJa UlJa

p Ca

0 91

Long Ave

UlAmNH AcSn AcSa UlAmNH

890

Wycliff St

UlAmNH AcPl AcPlCo AcRu

900

UlAmNH AcPlCl TaSpp

W Hampden Ave

Hunt Pl

is Ell e Av

MaAd

> > > >

Bradford St

MaAd

Map 4 - Raymond Avenue

Long Avenue to Energy Park Drive

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 5 - Raymond Avenue Energy Park Drive to Como Avenue Existing Conditions & Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Raymond Avenue from the Railroad Bridge to Como Avenue is characterized as a formal corridor. The roadway is schedule for reconstruction in 2016; the planning of this corridor occurred prior to the development of this plan. The proposed roadway reconstruction includes a two lane roadway with bike lanes on both sides. Boulevards with trees and sidewalks are also planned. Street lighting will be updated to the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. The proposed roadway width is 42 feet as the right-of-way width is 66 feet wide. On-street parking is proposed on the west side of Raymond Avenue from Blake Avenue to Lanford Park.

Proposed Improvements Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Raymond Avenue. A directional sign is programmed at Raymond Avenue and Blake Avenue and also at Raymond Avenue and Langford Park for Langford Park. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements The bridge over the Inter Campus Transit Way provides an opportunity for public art (P.3.5).

Raymond Avenue Figure 5.1 Blake Avenue to Como Avenue

side walk

blvd

parking lane

bike lane

traffic lane

bike lane

blvd

side walk

6’

8’

6’

11’

6’

66’ right-of-way

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Figure 5.1 Raymond Blvd – Blake Ave to Como Ave

200

100

200 Feet

Map 05 Raymond Ave Energy Pk Dr to Como Ave_v25

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

April 18, 2016

| 5

95 0

NORTH

0 89

940

ap n K

0 89

91 0

Feet

MAP KEY

LEGEND

ark

1.X

! ?

Ash Tree

e Blak e Av

CeOc AcSn SyRe

Scudder St

SyRe

3.9 monAcGi dRaAAcSn yvm e on SyRe CeOc dA CeOc UlMS ve 3.8

920

Como Ave

> >

900

Atty

Ray

CeOc

UlMS AcSa

ster rew

AcTa

AcGi AcGi AcGi

89 0

AcPlCo

Ave> >

890

Como

AcTa

> > > >

a St

Clevela nd Av e

WP ricill

CeOc CeOc AcSn

90 0

AcGi

AcPlCo

900

AcPlCo

Map 5 - Raymond Avenue Energy Park Drive to Como Avenue

ve A d

o ym

AcPl

2.4

900

2.4 >

tan

> >

UlMS

AcPl AcSn

UlMS

ay it W

0 89

AcPlSu

dish

CeOc

UlMS AcPl

ns Tra

900

p us

kD Pa r

y erg

tt ere v E

2.3

am rC

0 90

SyRe SyRe CeOc CeOc AcSa AcGi

910

In te

3.5

3.X Reinforcement

910

2.3

890

2.2

2.X Minor Decision Point

0 91

Ray

1.X Major Decision Point

92 0

5.1

940

0 90

2.2

Wayﬁnding

Cross Section Figure Number

Road Closure

nd Ave

1.X Gateway Node

Raised Crossing Proposed Roadway

o A avyem R d n

Placemaking

3 3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk Crosswalk

910

200

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

920

900

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

Lang ford P

New Bike Trail

p ap

Langford Park

0 50 100

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

> > >

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 6 - Como Avenue Raymond Avenue to Inter Campus Transit Way Existing Conditions Como Avenue between Raymond Avenue and the Inter Campus Transit Way is characterized as a formal corridor. The roadway is flanked on both sides with boulevards, trees within the boulevards, and sidewalks. Street lighting has not been updated to the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. Como Avenue is a 50 foot wide roadway with a right-of-way width of 85 feet. The roadway is a two lane roadway with bike lanes striped on both sides. On-street parking exists on both sides.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements A conversion of the sidewalk along the north side to a 12 foot wide multi use path is proposed. Como Avenue is also a dedicated County State Aid Roadway, which makes it difficult to propose other configurations for this roadway. No other improvements are planned along this area of Como Avenue. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Como Avenue. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A Gateway Node (P.1.2) is programed for the northeast corner of Raymond Avenue and Como Avenue. The Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map panels, seating, bike repair station, potential drinking fountain, waste receptacles, and public art and a corridor marker. Due to the narrow right-of-way agreements with the University of Minnesota will be required for placing this node. This node can be constructed independently of any work on Raymond Avenue or Como Avenue.

Como Avenue Figure 6.1 Raymond Avenue to Inter Campus Transit Way

multi-use trail

blvd

parking lane

bike lane

traffic lane

bike lane

parking lane

blvd

side walk

12’

8.5’

8’

6’

11’

6’

8’

8.5’

6’

85’ right-of-way

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Figure 6.1 Como Ave – Raymond Ave to Inter Campus Transit Way

200

April 18, 2016

910 0 90

NORTH

0 90

Feet

890

MAP KEY

0 89

LEGEND 890 New Bike Trail

0 50 100

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

890

900

0 89

890

? !

3.11

91 0

AcGi AcGi >> > > AcGi AcGi >AcGi UlAm >

St Ral eigh

91 0

3.11

o Av

Ave o m

2.5

AcPlCo > > AcPlCo > >> MaRR MaRR > AcPlCo> TiCoGr > AcPlCo> AcPlCo

890

3.X Reinforcement

Stella

Com

1.X Major Decision Point

Cross Section Figure Number

? !

900

89 0

0 90

890

920

0 90

> AcPlCo MaRR > > MaRR AcSa > 3.10 MaRR > TiCoGr > > AcPlCo AcPlCo > > AcPlCo

0 91

! ?

Av e 900

6.1

Ave

rS ste

> UlMS > UlMS

900

Fifield St

Com o

AcTa 3.10 > AcTa > > AcGi > AcGi> AcGi > AcGi AcPlCo>> AcPlCo > AcPlCo > AcPlCo

0 90

o ym AcSa >

> >AcSn

Inter Campus Transit Way

910

b ib

Road Closure

Wayﬁnding 2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

1.2

ve A d

1.X

Crosswalk

890

1.X Gateway Node 3.X Corridor Marker

Raised Crossing

Ash Tree

Placemaking 2.x Interpretive Node

Exist. Sidewalk

890

200

Canfield St

Fifield P

ve A d lan e ev Cl

| 5

90 0

New Sidewalk

AcSn CeOc > > CeOc > AcPl >

200 Feet

890

e Av p ap

90 0

N Raymond Ave

930

940

93 0

920

900

920

100

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

890

Map 06 Como Ave Raymond to Busway_v25

ici

Pr lla

Brewster

St 890

Map 6 - Como Avenue

Raymond Avenue to Inter Campus Transit Way

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 7 - Como Avenue Intercampus Transit Way to Underwood Street Existing Conditions Como Avenue between Inter Campus Transit Way and Snelling Avenue is characterized as formal corridor. The roadway is a four lane roadway with a boulevard and sidewalk along the south side of the roadway. The north side is typically an un-maintained turf boulevard with scattered access drives to the State Fair Grounds. A chain linked fence topped with barbed-wire exists along the northerly right-of-way line. Como Avenue within this area is a County State Aid Roadway, therefore any changes will need agreement with the County. The State Fair also plays an important role with this roadway as activities on the State Fair Ground affects traffic operations along Como Avenue. Como Avenue between Inter Campus Transit Way and Snelling Avenue varies from a 50 to a 58 foot wide roadway with a right-ofway width of 85 feet. Periodic on-street parking exists on the south side of the roadway.

Proposed Improvements

and between the bike trail and roadway. Lighting could also be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Como Avenue. Directional signs will also be placed for connections to the Inter Campus Transit Way and at Snelling Avenue. Corridor markers are also programed to be place at Snelling Avenue.

Como Avenue Figure 7.1 Intercampus Transit Way to North Snelling Avenue

side blvd walk

bike trail

blvd

shoulder

7’ 5’

10’

5’

7’

traffic lane

center turn lane

traffic lane

11’

12’

11’

shoulder

blvd side walk

7’ 5’ 5’

85’ right-of-way

Figure 7.1 Como Ave – Inter Campus Transit Way to N Snelling Ave: Non-State Fair Days

Roadway & Corridor Improvements Roadway Improvements includes reconstructing the roadway to 48 feet wide, creating an off-road bike trail and adding a sidewalk to the northerly side of Como Avenue; the sidewalk along the south side will remain. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. During Non-Fair Days the roadway will be striped for two travel lanes, a center turn lane, and wide shoulders on each side. During Fair Days the roadway will be restriped to accommodate four travel lanes. The reconstruction of the northerly boulevard area could provide areas for public art, barrier type landscaping within the new boulevard areas that are between the sidewalk and bike trail

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Como Avenue During Fair Time Figure 7.2 Intercampus Transit Way to North Snelling Avenue

side blvd walk

bike trail

blvd

traffic lane

7’ 5’

10’

5’

13’

11’

85’ right-of-way

Figure 7.2 Como Ave – Inter Campus Transit Way to N Snelling Ave: During State Fair

traffic blvd side walk lane

13’

5’

200

April 18, 2016

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

| 5

200

Placemaking

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk

1.X

Raised Crossing Crosswalk

91 0

0 50 100

Underwoood St

Wayﬁnding

1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point

Ash Tree

3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

Road Closure

93 0

Nelson St

910

New Bike Trail

910

Clough St

Stevens St

Liggett St

900

Bazaar Rd

900

Canfield St

Feet

MAP KEY

920

7.1, 7.2

930

Judson Ave

0 91

Inter Campus Transit Way

200 Feet

NORTH

Proposed Roadway

3.6

0 90

Como Ave Ave Como

UlAm >

3.12

3.13

900

e o Av

Com

LEGEND

910

? !

100

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

! ?

Map 07 Como Ave Busway to Underwood_v25

910

? !

N Cathlin St

910

Stella

90 0

890

Intercampus Transit Way to Underwood Street

0 90

890

0 89

Map 7 - Como Avenue

900

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 8 - Como Avenue Underwood Street to Pascal Street Existing Conditions See description of Como Avenue on Map 7 for the area west of Snelling Avenue. Como Avenue from Snelling Avenue to North Pascal Street is characterized as a designed corridor thru the business district at the west end and a formal corridor through the residential area. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with bike lanes, on-street parking on both sides and sidewalks. A center turf median with turn lanes does exist from Snelling Avenue to Arona Street. Wide, tree planted boulevards exist from Arona Avenue to North Pascal Avenue. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. Como Avenue between Snelling Avenue and North Arona Street is a 63 foot roadway with a right-of-way width of 100 feet. Como Avenue between North Arona Street and North Pascal Street is a 51 foot roadway with a right-of-way width of 100 feet.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Como Avenue roadway improvements from Snelling Avenue to North Arona Street includes reconstructing the roadway to 50 feet wide. Roadway improvements on Como Avenue from North Arona Street to North Pascal Street includes reconstructing the roadway to 38 feet wide. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Striping for Como Avenue from Snelling Avenue to North Arona Street will include on-street parking on both sides, two travel lanes and a center turn lane. The bike trail will be placed on the north side of the roadway; the off-road trail could be constructed independently of any major roadway modifications, such that the area between North Arona Street and North Pascal Street could move the northerly curb line to the south to accommodate the

off-road bike trail. There will be adequate space on both sides of the corridor for sidewalks, boulevards with tree planting and other amenities such as benches, public art, etc. Striping for Como Avenue from North Arona Street to North Pascal Avenue will include two travel lanes and on-street parking on both sides. The bike trail will be placed on the north side of the roadway. A raised tabled crossing is proposed across North Arona Street and North Pascal Street. The bike trail will be placed to allow adequate side boulevard bike blvd parking traffic traffic parking boulevard side center boulevard area for tree planting between both the sidewalk and walk walk lane lane lane trail lane turn lane bike trail and also between the bike trail and roadway. Sidewalks + 10’ 2’ 8’ 8’ varies +- 5’ 11’ 12’ 11’ varies - 5’ will also remain along the south side of the corridor. Lighting could 100’ right-of-way also be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Como Avenue Figure 8.1 North Snelling Avenue to Lantern Style lights. Figure 8.1 Como Ave – N Snelling Ave to N Arona St North Arona Street Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Como Avenue. Directional signs will also be placed at North Arona Street for the connections to Tilden Park and Hmong College Prep Academy. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements for both blocks of Como Avenue include creating an off-road bike trail along the northerly boulevard area; sidewalks will remain on both sides of the corridor. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements The area below the Snelling Avenue Bridge provides an opportunity for public art such as decorative lighting (P.3.8). Corridor markers (P.3.7 & P.3.9) are programmed for both the northwest and northeast corners of Como Avenue and Snelling Avenue.

side walk

blvd

bike trail

5’

13’

10’

blvd parking traffic lane lane

traffic lane

parking lane

blvd

side walk

8’

11’

8’

17’

5’

Como Avenue Figure 8.2 North Hamline Avenue

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

11’

95’ right-of-way

Figure 8.2 Como Ave – N Arona St to N Hamline Ave

7’

North Arona Street to

Map 8 Como Ave Underwood to Pascal_v25

200

April 18, 2016

100

200 Feet

| 5

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s Cosg ro v e NORTH

W Almond Ave

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

3.X Corridor Marker

! ?

930

Ash Tree

2.X Minor Decision Point

92 0

3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

8.1

Bazaar Rd

>> >

AcPlCk

N Snelling Ave

AcPlCk

N Winston St

AcPlCk

940

AcPlCk

940

> > >

AcRuNo CaSp QuAl

AcPlCk

GlTrSk AcSa

AcSn AcSn AcSn AcSn AcSn

AcPlCk

Ave> Como Ave Como >> > > > >>

? ? ! !

3.14

> >

AcPlCk

> > >

AcPlCk

> > >

AcPlCk

940

AcPlCk

> > >

AcPlCk

2.6

AcPlCk

AcPlCS >

AcPlCk >

> > > AcPl

910

AcPlCk AcPlCk

920 930

AcPlCk

BUS>

AcPlDe >

Como Ave

AcPlCS

W Como Ave

3.9 <BUS

<BUS

AcPlCk >

3.8

3.7

3.6

8.2

930

Road Closure

W Albany Ave

1.X Major Decision Point

N Pascal St

1.X

Raised Crossing

Wayﬁnding

94 0

Exist. Sidewalk

Proposed Roadway

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

Crosswalk

940

Placemaking

94 0

New Bike Trail

200

N Arona St

Underwoood St

LEGEND

0 50 100

94 0

Feet

MAP KEY

W Breda Ave

v Ser i ce

0 90

91 0

W Wynne Ave

W Brewster St

Map 8 - Como Avenue

Underwood Street to Pascal Street

900

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 9 - Como Avenue Pascal Street to Midway Parkway Existing Conditions Como Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Hamline Avenue is characterized as a formal corridor. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with bike lanes, on-street parking on both sides and sidewalks. Wide, tree planted boulevards exist from North Pascal Avenue to North Hamline Avenue. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. Como Avenue between North Arona Street and North Hamline Avenue is a 51 foot roadway with a right-of-way width of 100 feet. Como Avenue east of North Hamline Avenue winds through Como Regional Park. The corridor is a naturalistic park setting with broad woodlands and pastoral mown lawn areas accommodating picnic facilities. Multi-use trails and parking flank both sides of the roadway. Como Avenue between North Hamline Avenue to West Midway Parkway is a 44 foot wide street.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Como Avenue roadway improvements from North Pascal Street to Midway Parkway includes reconstructing the roadway to 38 feet wide. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Striping for Como Avenue from North Pascal Street to Midway Parkway will include two travel lanes and on-street parking on both sides. The bike trail will be placed on the north side of the roadway. The bike trail will be placed to allow adequate boulevard area for tree planting between both the sidewalk and bike trail and also between the bike trail and roadway. Sidewalks will also remain along the south side of the corridor between North Pascal Street

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

and North Hamline Avenue and the multi-use trail will remain east of North Hamline Avenue. Lighting could also be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Como Avenue. Operational signs will also be placed at the northwest corner of Como Avenue and North Hamline Avenue. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include creating an off-road bike trail along the northerly boulevard area from North Pascal Street to North Hamline Avenue. Improvements to the east of North Hamline Avenue include constructing a separate pedestrian trail. The existing multi-use trail could be converted to a bike only trail. The off-road trails could be constructed independently of any major roadway modifications, such that the area between North Pascal Street could move the northerly curb line to the south to accommodate the off-road bike trail and the area east of North Hamline Avenue could construct the separate use trails without affecting the roadway. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A Gateway Node (P.1.3) that serves as a welcome to Como Regional Park, is preproposal for the northeast corner of Como Avenue and North Hamline Avenue. The Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map panels, seating, bike blvd blvd multiside blvd bike parking traffic traffic parking use walk lane lane trail lane lane repair station, potential drinking fountain, waste receptacles, and trail 8’ 8’ 11’ 11’ 5’ varies 10’ varies varies 10’ public art and a corridor marker. This node to be built with respect 60-66’ right-of-way to Como Park design standards and studies. This node can be constructed independently of any work on Como Avenue or North Como Avenue Figure 9.1 North Hamline Avenue to West Midway Figure 9.1 Como Ave – N Hamline Ave to W Midway Pkwy Hamline Avenue. Parkway

Map 9 Horton Ave Pascal to Midway_v25

200

100

200 Feet

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

April 18, 2016

| 5

0 91

W Midway Pkwy Midway Pkwy

Feet

MAP KEY

930

Placemaking

0 93 1.X Gateway Node

3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk

Wayﬁnding

1.X

Raised Crossing

0 94

1.X Major Decision Point

Crosswalk

2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree

Cross Section Figure Number

Road Closure

N Beulah La

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

o br a t s

940

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

Canfield Ave

New Bike Trail

! ?

200

940

WLEGEND Canfield Ave

0 50 100

920

NORTH

W Almond Ave

940

W Albany Ave

AcSa

AcPlCk

N Albert St

> >

> AcPlDe

AcPlCk AcPlD

AcPlCk

AcPlCk AcPlCk

> > e

1.3

AcPlCk AcPlCk

> > >

930

3.15

AcPlCk

> >

> > > QuMa

AcPlCk

> >>

AcPlCk QuMa

AcPlCk

QuMa QuMa QuMa

AcPlCk

> >

AcPlCk

AcPl

AcPlCk

Como Ave Como Ave AcPlCk

AcSa

3.16

Como Ave

0 92 0 92

W Breda Ave 940

930 940

Map 9 - Como Avenue

Pascal Street to Midway Parkway

930

920

940

UlAm

AcPlCk

>> >

AcPlCk

UlAm

> >

3.17

930

8.2

AcPlCk

> > >

AcRuNo QuAl CaSp

AcPlCk

> >

AcPlCk

AcPlCk AcPlCk

AcPlCk

> > >

GlTrSk AcSa

AcPlCk

940

9.1

920

94 0

930

920

N Hamline Ave

N Pascal St

940

Av e

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 10 - Horton Avenue Midway Parkway to Gateway Drive Existing Conditions Como Avenue east West Midway Parkway continues to wind through Como Regional Park. The corridor is a naturalistic park setting with broad woodlands and pastoral mown lawn areas accommodating picnic facilities. Multi-use trails and parking flank both sides of the roadway. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with on-street parking and multi-use trails on both sides. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. Como Avenue between Midway Parkway and North Lexington Avenue is a 44 foot roadway with a right-of-way width of 63 feet. Como Avenue between North Lexington Avenue is a 45 foot roadway with a right-of-way width of 60 feet. The multi-use trails on the north side of Como Avenue continue northward and crosses below North Lexington Avenue then winds northeasterly towards the Como Park Pavilion. The trails intersect south of the Pavilion parking lot with a one-way bike trail and a two-way pedestrian trial which both circumnavigate Como Lake.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Como Avenue roadway improvements from Midway Parkway to North Lexington Avenue includes reconstructing the roadway to 38 feet wide. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Striping for Como Avenue from Midway Parkway to North Lexington Avenue will include two travel lanes and on-street parking on both sides. Lighting could also be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Wayfinding Improvements It is the intent to use existing Como Regional Park wayfinding

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

system to accommodate the Grand Round, such as providing Grand Round reinforcement and branding. Proper reinforcement and operational signage through Como Regional Park and around Lake Como is also programmed. A directional sign will also be provided at the northwest corner of Como Avenue and North Lexington Avenue to provide direction through Como Regional Park. Grand Round reinforcement signs will also be placed along Horton Avenue to Nagasaki Road to Como Boulevard for the motoring public. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements

side blvd walk

blvd

bike trail

parking traffic lane lane

traffic lane

parking lane

blvd

multiuse trail

8’ 8’ 11’ 11’ 5’ varies 10’ varies varies 10’ Horton Avenue and Nagasaki Road were also analyzed to see if they 60-66’ right-of-way could accommodate bike and pedestrian facilities; the narrowness Horton Avenue Figure 10.1 West Midway Parkway to North of the 60 foot right-of-way and topography changes create a Lexington Avenue challenging design for this area. Therefore the improvements Figure for 10.1 Como Ave – W Midway Pkwy to N Lexington Ave the bike and pedestrian facilities are proposed to take place within Como Regional Park. Improvements include reconstructing the existing multi-use trails along the north side of Como Avenue to include separated bike and pedestrian trails. The separated trails will continue northward and cross below North Lexington Avenue, from there it will continue northeasterly to the existing bike and pedestrian trail on the west side of Como Lake. This intersection provides a great opportunity to place a bike trail round-about to provide a safe transition to the trails around Como Lake. The existing bike trails around Como Lake should be reviewed for both circulation and potential reconstruction to accommodate additional cyclists with the addition of the Grand Round. The offroad separated pedestrian and bike trails could be constructed side blvd parking traffic traffic parking blvd side independently of any roadway modifications. walk

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements

5’

9’

lane

8’

11’

8’

walk

9’

5’

66’ right-of-way A Gateway Node (P.1.4) that will enhance the Como Regional Park Horton Avenue Figure 10.2 North Lexington Avenue to Van placemaking and wayfinding system is also programmed for the Figure 10.2 Lake. Horton Ave – N Lexington Ave to Van SlykeSStlyke S treet major trail intersection on the west side of Como

Map 10 Horton Ave Midway to Lake_v25

0 200 Feet G r a n d R o u n200d P l100 a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

April 18, 2016

91 0

910

0 91

k200

n so

0 50 100

New Bike Trail Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

93 0

1.X

Raised Crossing Crosswalk

920

Wayﬁnding 1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

! ?

1.X Gateway Node 3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk

1.4

Placemaking 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

| 5

910

Esta bro o

910

NORTH

LEGEND

uf m

910

940

Aida Pl Feet

MAP KEY

Ash Tree

3.X Reinforcement

Road Closure

Cross Section Figure Number

910

900

920

Como Lake

900

0 91

Como Ave

910

10.2 3.18

880

y wa

10.1

910

lvd oB m

Mid

N Lexingto n Ave

0 91

910

89 0

3.19

CeOc >

2.7

CeOc > > CeOc > QuRu

Ga te

ve rton A

n Va

SyRe SyRe > >

QuRu AcAut CeOc > QuRu > TiCo MaSpp > >> AcPl > > CeOc >

QuRu >

wa yD

900

920

e yk

930

920

910

92 0

900

910

Map 10 - Horton Avenue

Midway Parkway to Gateway Drive

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 11 - Nagasaki Road

West Como Boulevard to Como Boulevard

Existing Conditions Horton Avenue and Nagasaki Road were analyzed to see if they could accommodate bike and pedestrian facilities. The narrowness of the 60 foot right-of-way and topography changes create a challenging design for this area. Therefore the improvements for the bike and pedestrian facilities are proposed to take place within Como Regional Park. The intersection of East Como Boulevard, West Maryland Avenue, West Wheelock Parkway, North Victoria Street and East Como Lake Drive requires additional analysis to create a safe route for offroad bike trail and pedestrian facilities through this non-typical intersection. A modified intersection could reduce pavement area and create additional spaces for stormwater best management practices in this location.

Round. The off-road bike trails and sidewalks could be constructed independently of any roadway modifications. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A Gateway Node (P.1.5) that will serve as a welcome to Como Regional Park is programed for the west side of the intersection of East Como Boulevard, West Maryland Avenue, West Wheelock Parkway, North Victoria Street and East Como Lake Drive. The Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map panels, seating, bike repair station, potential drinking fountain, waste receptacles, and public art and a corridor marker. This node can be constructed independently of any other work.

Proposed Improvements Wayfinding Improvements It is the intent to use the existing Como Regional Park wayfinding system to accommodate the Grand Round, such as providing Grand Round reinforcement and branding. Proper reinforcement and operational signage through Como Regional Park and around Lake Como is also programmed. A directional sign will also be provided at the northwest corner of Como Avenue and North Lexington Avenue to provide direction through Como Regional Park. Grand Round reinforcement signs will also be placed along Horton Avenue to Nagasaki Road to Como Boulevard for the motoring public. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements The existing bike trail through Como Regional Park should be reviewed for potential reconstruction and expansion to accommodate additional cyclists with the addition of the Grand

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Nagasaki Road

boulevard

traffic lane

varies

12’

Figure 11.1 West Como Boulevard to

Como Boulevard

Figure 11.1 Nagasaki Rd – W Como Blvd to Como Blvd

traffic lane

blvd

bike trail

12’ varies 12’ 66’ right-of-way

blvd

ped. trail

buffer

varies

8’

varies

lake

Map 11 Como Lake to Avon_v25 April 18, 2016

200

Additional analysis is required for intersection allignment and use of East Como Lake Drive.

W Maryland Ave

asa

ki R oad

> QuBi

11.1

> QuBi

890

> QuBi

Como Blvd

> QuBi

910

> QuBi > QuMa > QuMa

900

lyke

3.21

St NORTH

900

ew at G

Van S

1.X

Road Closure

Map 11 - Nagasaki Road

90 0

2.X Minor Decision Point 3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

West Como Boulevard to Como Boulevard

W Como Ave

l oP om

Ash Tree

1.X Major Decision Point

N Colne St

Proposed Roadway

0 91

Wayﬁnding

N Ryde St

1.X

TiAmRe >910

Nagasaki Road

1.X Gateway Node 3.X Corridor Marker

Crosswalk

! ?

Placemaking

N Kilburn St

Raised Crossing

3.20

TiAmRe >

890

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk Exist. Sidewalk

N Chatsworth St

N Argyle St

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

> QuMa

? !

200

W Rose Ave

> UlMG

New Bike Trail

Feet

0 50 100

900

> QuMa

880

MAP KEY

LEGEND

900

W Com Blvd o

> CeOc

900

ck o l e he

w Pk

900

0 88

TiCo > AeGl > > > UlAm TiAmRe>> > > AeGl > > AcPl TiCo > > > > AeGl AcSaGM AeGl TiCo > > > > AcSaGM AeGl AcSG TiCo > >> > TiCoGr > > AcPl AeGl > TiCo > > > > AeGl AcSG AcPl > AcSG > > AeGl AcSG AeGl > TiCoGr UlAmPr > > > > TiCoGr AcSG > > AcSaGM UlAmPr > AcAut > > TiCo TiCo > TiAmSe> AeGl > TiCo > > > AeGl AcPl AeGl PiGlBH TiCo ? > > ?>! ! TiAmSe TiAmSe > > GiBi > > TiCo > > AcSa> AeGlAS AcPl > AeGl 1.5 > AcSa TiAmSe> > AeGl >

910

EC E om o B Co l vd mo Lake Dr

91 0

90 0

| 5

AcAut > AcRu > > TiAmRe >

N Avon St

sag

Como Lake

900

200 Feet

910

N Victoria St

Nag

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s 910

100

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 12 - Wheelock Parkway Avon Street to Kent Street Existing Conditions West Wheelock Parkway from North Victoria Street to North Kent Street is characterized as a naturalistic corridor. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with no on-street parking. Sidewalks exist on both sides of West Wheelock Parkway from North Victoria Street to North Kent Street. Wide, tree planted boulevards exist along Wheelock Parkway. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. West Wheelock Parkway from North Victoria Street to North Kent Street is a 30 foot roadway with a 120 foot parkway.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements West Wheelock Parkway from North Victoria Street to North Kent Street includes reconstructing the roadway to 24 feet wide. Striping for this corridor will include two travel lanes.

roadway and south side sidewalk. The bike trail will be placed to allow adequate boulevard area for tree planting between both the sidewalk and bike trail and also between the bike trail and roadway. The bike trail will also have raised tabled crossings at North Alameda Street, North Saint Albans Street, North Maywood Street, North Danforth Street, and North Kent Street. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A Gateway Node (P.1.5) that will serve as a welcome to Como Regional Park is programed for the west side of the intersection of East Como Boulevard, West Maryland Avenue, West Wheelock Parkway, North Victoria Street and East Como Lake Drive. The Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map panels, seating, bike repair station, potential drinking fountain, waste receptacles, and public art and a corridor marker. This node can be constructed independently of any other work.

Lighting could will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Wheelock Parkway. Directional signs will be placed at North Grotto Street for connections to Como Senior High School, and at North Saint Albans Street for connections to Northdale Recreation Center, and at North Dale Street for connections to Marydale Park. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include reconstructing the existing sidewalks and adding an off-road bike trail to the south side boulevard area. Sidewalks will be constructed as close to the parkway property lines as possible. The bike trail will be positioned between the

Wheelock Parkway Figure 12.1 North Victoria Street to West Nebraska Avenue

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

blvd

bike trail

blvd

side walk

5’

varies

12’

6’

10’

varies

5’

120’ right-of-way

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016 Figure 12.1 W Wheelock Pkwy - N Victoria St to W Nebraska Ave

Map 12 Wheelock Parkway Avon to Kent_v25 April 18, 2016

200

100

200 Feet

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

| 5

920 NORTH

W Lakeview 0Ave 50 Feet

MAP KEY

LEGEND

91 0 100

200

910 Placemaking

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X Gateway Node

910

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk

930

New Bike Trail

12.1

Wayﬁnding

AcSa AcSa AcPlSu AcSa TiCoGr AcSa AcRu AcSa AeGl AeGl > > > > > > TiCoGr AeGl > > > >> > > > AcPl PiAb AcPl > AcSa AcAut TiAmRe > > TiCoGr > > > > > > > > > AeGl > TiCoGr TiCoGr > > > > > > > > > TiAmRe TiCoGr UlAm > AcPlSu > > > > Crosswalk > > AeGl TiCoGr 2.X Minor Decision Point > > > > TiCoGr > AcPl AcPl >TiCoGr > TiCoGr > > > TiCoGr TiAmRe TiCoGr TiCoGr TiCoGr TiCoGr TiCoGr AcPlSu TiCoGr TiAmRe > Proposed Roadway 3.X Reinforcement AcSa > AcAut > > > TiAmSe > > TiCoGr > > > > TiCoGr > > > > AcAut AcSG AcSG TiCoGr AcPl > > > > > > UlJa > > AcPlJG Ash Tree > AcSa UlAmVF > > > TiAmRe > > AcSa > AcSa Cross Section >>> AcSa > > > AcSa AcSaFM > UlAmPr> > TiCoGr TiCoGr > > AcSa > > > > AcSa AcPl PiAb TiAmRe > > > UlAmPr AcSa > > > AcSG > > AcSa AcSa AcSn AcSa AcSa AcPl Figure Number > > > TiAmRe TiAmSe > UlAmPr > MaSpp > Road Closure AcSa UlAmPr UlAmPr > > AcPl 3.10 AcPl > > UlAmPr > AcSa 2.10 > AcSa > TiAmRe 2.9 TiAmRe > TiCoGr> > TiAmRe > AcSaGM > > > TiCoGr TiCoGr AcPl > > TiAmRe AcSa > TiCoGr TiCoGr > > AcPl 910 AcAut > TiCoGr > > AcSaGM AcAut > TiCoGr > > AcPl > UlAmPr > > AcAut > AcSaGM > > MaSpp UlAm > > > TiAmRe AcSaGM AcPl > > > AcSaGM AcAut AcAut 91 > > AcAut > AcSa 0 TiAmRe > > AcSa > TiCo >AcAut TiCo > TiCo AcPl AeGl 910 > 0 >> 91 TiCoGr TiCoGr > TiAmRe > > AeGl > TiAmRe > AcSaGM > TiAmRe > > > > TiCoGr AcRu >AcAut > AeGl AcPl 2.8 > AeGl TiAmRe > AeGl > > > TiCoGr > > > AcSG AeGl 90 > > AcPl 920 0 TiCo > TiCo AeGl >> > AcPl UlAm > AeGl > > > TiCoGr TiCo > > > >AeGl AcSaGM AeGl 920 TiCo > > > > AcSaGM AeGl > TiCo > > > TiCoGr AcSG 89 > > > AeGl TiCo > 0 > AeGl > > AcSG AcPl AeGl > AcSG AcPl > > AcSG AeGl > TiCoGr 0 > > > 92 > TiCoGr UlAmPr > AcSaGM > > AcSG 0 UlAmPr 92 900 > AeGl 88 > 0 89 > TiAmSe > AeGl 920 >

1.X

Raised Crossing

1.X Major Decision Point

W Wheelock Parkway

N Kent St

N Dale St

920

N Maywood St

N Saint Albans St

N Danforth St

910

0 89

90 0

910

900

lo ee

N Alameda St

N Avon St

W Orange Ave

ar P k

920

N Grotto St

kwy P k oc eel

0 92

N Folsom St

! ?

W Ivy Ave

900

Map 12 - Wheelock Parkway Avon Street to Kent Street

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 13 - Wheelock Parkway Kent Street to Western Avenue Existing Conditions

Trail & Sidewalk Improvements

West Wheelock Parkway from North Kent Street to West Arlington Avenue is characterized as a naturalistic corridor. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with no on-street parking. Sidewalks exist on both sides of West Wheelock Parkway from North Danforth Street to Mackubin Street. Wide, tree planted boulevards exist along Wheelock Parkway. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

Improvements include reconstructing the existing sidewalks and adding an off-road bike trail to the south side boulevard area. Sidewalks will be constructed as close to the parkway property lines as possible. The bike trail will be positioned between the roadway and south side sidewalk. The bike trail will be placed to allow adequate boulevard area for tree planting between both the sidewalk and bike trail and also between the bike trail and roadway.

West Wheelock Parkway from North Victoria Street to North Westminster Street is a 30 foot roadway with a 120 foot parkway. The character of West Wheelock Parkway changes in this areas from a roadway that is lined on both sides with single family homes to housing only on the west side of the parkway. There is a wooded bluff on the easterly side of the parkway, which provides viewpoint opportunities, a place for trail amenities, and birdwatching.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements West Wheelock Parkway from North Kent Street to North Western Avenue includes reconstructing the roadway to 24 feet wide. Striping for this corridor will include two travel lanes. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Wheelock Parkway. Directional signs will be placed at N Western Avenue for connections to Washington Technology Magnet School.

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

The bike trail will also have raised tabled crossings at North Schletti Street, and North Mackubin Street. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements An interpretive node (P.2.4) is programmed for the overlook on the south side of West Wheelock Parkway between West Cottage Avenue and West Arlington Avenue. A corridor marker (P.3.11) will also be placed at the southeast corner of West Wheelock Parkway and West Arlington Avenue.

200

100

200 Feet

Map 13 Wheelock Parkway Kent to Western v25 April 18, 2016

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s St

940

0 94

NORTH

> >

a sk

0 94

e Av

940

> > >

>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

a br Ne

tS n e

> > k > > oc> el > > he > > W>

! ?

> > > > > > > > >

AcRu UlAm 0 50 100 200 AcSa UlAm Feet MAP KEY TiCoGr 94 AeGl 0 LEGEND TiCoGr TiCoGr TiCoGr New Bike Trail Placemaking 1.X Exist. Bike/Shared 1.X Gateway Node AcPl AcSa Use Trail AeGl 2.x Interpretive Node TiCoGr AcSa 40 New Sidewalk 9 3.X Corridor Marker TiCoGr AeGl 40 Exist. Sidewalk AcSa Wayﬁnding 9 AeGl 94 AcSa 1.X 0 Raised Crossing 1.X Major Decision Point AeGl TiCoGr AcSn AcPlSu Crosswalk 2.X Minor Decision Point AcSa TiCoGr AeGl Proposed Roadway 3.X Reinforcement AcSa 940 TiCoGr AeGl Ash Tree Cross Section Figure Number Road Closure AcMi TiCoGrAeGl AcSa TiCoGr TiAmRe AcSa TiAmRe AeGl TiCoGr UlJa AcSaGM AcAut TiCoGr AeGl AcSaGM AcSa TiAmRe AcSaGM TiCoGr AcAut AcSaGM AcAut AcSaGM TiCoGr AcSaGM AcAut AcSa TiCoGr TiCoGr AcSaGM AeGl AcSaGM TiAmRe TiCoGr AcSa TiAmRe AcSa AcSaGM AcSa AeGl TiCoGr TiCoGr AcSaGM AcSa AcSaGM TiCoGr AeGl AcPlSu AcSaGM TiCoGr TiAmSe AeGl AeGl AcPlSu AcSG TiCoGr AcPlSu AeGl AcSaGM AcSaGM AeGl TiCoGr TiCoGr AeGl AeGl AcSaGM AcSa 3.22 AeGl UlAmPr AeGl AeGl AcPlSu AeGl TiCoGr AeGl AcSaGM AcSa AcAut TiCoGr AcAut TiAmSe AcAut TiAmSe UlJa TiAmSe TiAmSe UlAmPr AcPlSu AeGl AeGl TiAmSe CeOc AcSG AeGl AcAut TiCoGr AcPlCl TiCoGr AcPlSu AcAut UlJa AcPlSu UlAmPr AeGl AeGl CeOc AcSG AcPl AeGl AcSG AeGl AcPl AeGl AcPl AcSa TiCoGr AeGl TiCoGr UlAm CeOc AeGl AeGl CeOc CeOc TiCoGr TiCoGr 2.4 AcPl UlJa AeGl AeGl TiCoGr AeGl AcAut UlJa AcRu AcPlSu AeGl AcSaGM AcSG AeGl TiCoGr UlAmPr AcPl UlAmPr AcAut AeGl TiCo AcAut AeGl TiAmRe AcSa UlJa TiCoGr TiAmRe TiAmRe TiCoGr UlJa AeGl UlPu AcSa TiCo AcAut TiCoGr AeGl UlJa 920 AeGl AcPl UlAmPr AcPl AcPl 0

940

> > > > > >

o nf a D

rth

lS e nd ru

ti S t hle

0 94

r Pa

> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

| 5

e Av

ge tta Co

M N 12.1

? !

e Av

? ! ? ! ! ? > >

? !

? ! ! ?

2.11

890

880

870

Map 13 - Wheelock Parkway

Kent Street to Western Avenue

he W

kC c elo

870 880

nia i g Vir St

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

? !

? ! > ? !

> ! ?

? !

> ? ! > >

> >

ge an Or v e A

3.11

rn e t es W ? ! > ! ?

Parkwa y

91 00 9

930

> ? >!

> >

>> >

eelock

> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >

> > > > > > >

W Wh

> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > >>

> >> >> > > > > >

y W W heelock Pkw

>>> > > >> >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >

n ha o C

> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >

St y se

e Av

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >

n to

g lin

bin u k ac

m Cu

d lr an be

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 14 - Wheelock Parkway Western Avenue to Marion Street Existing Conditions West Wheelock Parkway from West Arlington Avenue to North Marion Street is characterized as a naturalistic corridor. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with no on-street parking. Sidewalks do not exist from West Arlington Avenue to North Rice Street. Wide, tree planted boulevards exist along Wheelock Parkway. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. West Wheelock Parkway from West Arlington Avenue to North Marion Street is a 30 foot roadway with a 120 foot parkway. The character of West Wheelock Parkway continues to only have single family homes on the west side of the parkway, with the exception of three homes located adjacent to the parkway on the east side of the parkway. This parkway includes a “horseshoe” hairpin turn that drops down about 45 feet along the face of the bluff.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements West Wheelock Parkway from West Arlington Avenue to North Marion Street includes reconstructing the roadway to 24 feet wide. Striping for this corridor will include two travel lanes. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights.

side. The bike trail will be positioned between the roadway and south / east side sidewalk. The bike trail will be placed to allow adequate boulevard area for tree planting between both the sidewalk and bike trail and also between the bike trail and roadway. The sidewalk and bike trail will be aligned to veer away from the existing homes to provide ample set-backs. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements An interpretive node (P.2.5) is programed for an area within the “horseshoe” bend; this area also provides an opportunity for public art. This area, historically known as Memorial Park, provides an excellent area for an interpretive node, public art, and a pull off area that could serve as a “mini trailhead” or parklet for the Grand Round.

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

5’

varies

12’

Wheelock Parkway

traffic lane

blvd

12’

6’

bike trail

blvd

side walk

blvd

10’ varies 5’

varies

120’ right-of-way

Figure 14.1 Near Hoyt Avenue

Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Wheelock Parkway. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include constructing sidewalks along both sides of the parkway and adding an off-road bike trail to the south and east

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

blvd

bike trail

blvd

5’

varies

12’

16’

10’

varies

120’ right-of-way

Wheelock Parkway Figure 14.2 W Wheelock Pkwy – W Idaho Ave to N Rice St

Figure 14.2 West Idaho Avenue to North Rice Street

side walk

5’

Map 14 Wheelock Parkway Western to Marion_v25

April 18, 2016

| 5

G r a n d 200 R o u n100d P l a0 n R e co m200 m eFeet n dat i o n s W eu

ve rA

> >

? !

> > > > > >

? !

GyDi

? !

> > > > >

? !

GlTrSk GlTrSk GyDi

AcSG

? >!

? !

>> > >

? > ! ? > !

? !

UlAmPr

? !

GlTrSk GlTrSk GyDi TiAmRe

14.2

860

Par RhSpp kw AcSG St aTiAmRe y n

? !

?> !

lock

?> !

hee

?> ! > > ? ! ? ! > ! > > ? > > > > > ! ? > > > > > >

> >> > >

? !

> > >> >

? !

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

? !

Western Avenue to Marion Street

? > !

TiAm TiAmRe TiAmRe

S yt

io ar

e Av

n to

r Fa

0 85

g lin

n to g in

> > > > >

? > !

?> !

8 TiAmRe TiAmRe GlTrSk GlTrSk GlTr AcNe BePa GlTrSk UlAmPr AcSG GlTr GlTrSk TiAmReTiAmRe GlTrSk TiSpp GlTr TiAmRe

e Av

GlTrSk TiAmSe

> > ? > ! > > > > > > >> >>

? !

GlTrSk

o ah Id

TiAmRe GlTrSk TiAm

> >

? ! ? !

890

0 90

? !

910

88 0

? !

> >

AcSa

GyDi

TiAm

GlTrSk GlTrSk

87 0

! ?

> > >

PiNi PiNi

QuBi

? ! ! ?

?! ! ? > >> > >> >

? !

Map 14 - Wheelock Parkway

MaSpp

AcNe GlTr GlTrSk GlTrSk UlPu AcNe GlTr GlTr TiSpp TiAmRe TiAmRe AcAut

0 87

88 0

nia i g Vir St

2.5

AeHi GyDi

AeHi AeHi BeNi AeHi BeNi BeNi AeHi CeOc AeHi BeNi TiAm AeHi BeNi CeOc 20 AeHi 9 CeOc CaSp CaSp CaSp CaSp

ia n i rg Vi

y yAcSG akw P w k k cr

ePloa k e c h o l eeW

hW WW

? !

? ! ? ! ! ?

TiAm

CeOc AcSa CeOc

AcPl AcPl PiNi PiNi AcPl PiNi PiNi PiNi AcPl AcAut UlJa AcPl GlTr UlJa

! ? ? !

? ! > ? !

> ! ?

TiAm

? !

? ! ! ?

UlPu AcPl

? !

? ! ! ?

> ? ! > >

> >

>> >

> ? >!

> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >

CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc UlAmPr AcSG

CeOc CeOc CeOc

? >! >

N TiAmSe AcPl AeGl AcAut AcSG AcSG AcSG AeGl AcPlSu TiCoGr TiAmRe AcSa AcPl TiAmRe TiAmRe

AcGi AcGi AcSG

GlTrSk

> > > >

e Av

> > > > > > >

e W

rn e t s

UlAmPr

AeHi

e Av

? !

a sk

14.1

r te s e W

85 0

UlAmPr GlTrSk

BeNi 3.23 CaSp BeNi CaSp GyDi MaSpp MaSpp

? !

a br

ve A n

Cross Section Figure Number

Road Closure

930

e Av

3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree

TiAm CeOc CeOc

GyDi

2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

GyDi AcAut

1.X Major Decision Point

Wayﬁnding

1.X

yt Ho

Crosswalk

1.X Gateway Node St 2.x Interpretive Node l de 3.X Corridor Marker n u

Raised Crossing

e Av

New Sidewalk Exist. Sidewalk

Placemaking

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

o ah

New Bike Trail

200

MAP KEY

0 50 100

930

n 4 LEGEND ha 9

Feet

e rp

NORTH

yS e s 0

0 94

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 15 - Wheelock Parkway Marion Street to Trout Brook Trail Existing Conditions West Wheelock Parkway from North Marion Street to North Rice Street is characterized as a naturalistic corridor. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with no on-street parking. No sidewalks exist along West Wheelock Parkway from the “horseshoe” bend to North Rice Street; from North Rice Street to the east a sidewalk along the south side exists. Wide, tree planted boulevards exist along Wheelock Parkway. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

sidewalk and bike trail and also between the bike trail and roadway. The bike trail will also have raised tabled crossings at North Marion Street, North Woodbridge Street, North Albemarle Street, and North Park Street. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A corridor marker (P.3.12) will also be placed at the southeast corner of West Wheelock Parkway and North Rice Street.

West Wheelock Parkway from North Marion Street to North Rice Street is a 30 foot roadway with a 120 foot parkway.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements West Wheelock Parkway from North Victoria Street to North Westminster Street includes reconstructing the roadway to 24 feet wide. Striping for this corridor will include two travel lanes. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Wheelock Parkway. Operational signage will be placed on the south east corner of West Wheelock Parkway and North Rice Street. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include reconstructing and adding sidewalks and adding an off-road bike trail to the south side boulevard area. Sidewalks will be constructed as close to the parkway property lines as possible. The bike trail will be positioned between the roadway and south side sidewalk. The bike trail will be placed to allow adequate boulevard area for tree planting between both the

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Wheelock Parkway Figure 15.1 North Rice Street to Trout Brook Bridge

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

blvd

bike trail

5’

varies

12’

16’

10’

120’ right-of-way

blvd side set back - due to walk homes on ROW line

5’ 5’

varies

April 18, 2016

840 Feet

MAP KEY

LEGEND

0 85

New Bike Trail

870

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

Raised Crossing Crosswalk

! ?

840

N Albemarle St

870

W Hoyt St

870 860

850

840

N Park St

15.1 N Rice St

N Marion St

3.24

86 0

GlTrSk > ? ! GlTrSk > ?TiCoGr ! > ? ! AcNe GlTr > > TiAmRe rSk > > GyDi > > TiAmRe >GlTrSk > GlTr > > GlTrSk TrSk > ? ! > > TiSpp > > GlTr ? ! AmRe > > ! > TiAmRe ? > AcSG > > > > TiAmRe TiAmRe ? > TiAmRe ! > > > BePa GlTrSk > >GlTr > GlTrSk > TiAmRe > AcAut > AeGl GlTrSk ? ! >GlTrSk UlAmPr GlTr TiAm > > > > ? ! GlTrSk > TiAmSe GlTr > > TiAmRe > GlTr >TiSpp > > TiAmRe AcNe > > AcNe ? ! UlPu >

3.12

830

Sk > ! ? rSk > > GyDi

wy ock Pk l e he

830

?> RhSpp!

3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

TiCoGr TiCoGr TiCoGr AcAut TiAmRe AcPl > > ! TiCoGr > > ? PiGl>> ? ! > > > TiAmRe >> > > > > AcPlDe > > TiCoGr > AcPlDe > UlAmPr > > >> >> AcPlDe > AcPlDe AcPlDe AcPlDe AcPlDe AcPlDe > AcPlDe AcPl > AcPl > > > AcPlDe > > AcPlDe > > AcPlDe > > > AcPlDe > AcPlDe AcPlDe ? ! ! ? > TiCoGr SyRe > > ! ? ! ? ! ? ! > ? AcPl ? > >TiCoGr > TiCoGr > > > ! TiCoGr TiAmRe TiAmRe TiAmRe TiCoGr

PiRe ? > ! ? ! ? AcAut ! TiCoGr ? >! ? ! ? TiCoGr TiCoGr ? ! ?>! ? ! ?! ! PiRe ? ! > > > > TiCoGl > > TiCoGr > UlPa > AcArm TiAm TiCoGr ? > ! UlAmPr > > TiCoGr > PiRe ? ! TiCoGr > PiRe > > PiRe > > TiAmSe > TiCoGr ! ? >! ? ! ! ? ! ? ? ! ! ? ! ? ? TiCoGr ? ! ? PiSt 8! ? ! ? ! TiAmRe > 70 PiRe > QuPa >> PiSt TiAmRe > ? ! > AcSG ? ! TiAmRe > ! ?PiSt > ? ! TiAmRe > ! TiAmRe ? > 85 ? ! > TiAm

1.X Major Decision Point

870

14.2

k> Sk >

Wayﬁnding 2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

1.X Gateway Node 3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk

Road Closure

Placemaking 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

Ash Tree

85 0 50 100 0 200

860

NORTH

850

Idaho Ave W

| 5

Sylvan St N

Rice St N

W Larpenteur Ave

0 84

Marion St N

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

860

15 Wheelock n to Trout Brook v25

Marion Street to Trout Brook Trail

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6 0 84

Map 15 - Wheelock Parkway

840

W Montana Ave

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 16 - Wheelock Parkway Trout Brook Trail to I-35 Existing Conditions West Wheelock Parkway from North Rice Street to I35E is a formal corridor. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with no on-street parking. Sidewalks exist along the south side of West Wheelock Parkway from North Rice Street to I35E. Wide, tree planted boulevards exist along Wheelock Parkway. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

lines as possible. The bike trail will be positioned between the roadway and south side sidewalk. The bike trail will be placed to allow adequate boulevard area for tree planting between both the sidewalk and bike trail and also between the bike trail and roadway. The bike trail will also have raised tabled crossings at Wheelock Drive.

West Wheelock Parkway also crosses Trout Brook Trail. This intersection provides an opportunity to connect two regional trails. However there is 32 feet of elevation change between the two trails; this presents a design challenge to connect the trails and stay within the existing parkway and right-of-ways.

Proposed Improvements

the un-improved right-of-way of North Sylvan Street to West Larpenteur Avenue then connect with the Trout Brook Trail. This side traffic traffic buffer cycle side alternative is not economical, therefore a stairway from the easterly walk lane lane track walk abutment of Trout Brook Bridge to Trout Brook Trail is proposed. 7.33’ 12’ 12’ 2’ 8’ 7.33’ The stairway will include a u-shape bike channel to assist cyclists 34’ curb to curb 48’ bridge that push their bikes up and down the stairway. Other routes to access Trout Brook Trail would be south on North Jackson Street toW Wheelock Pkwy – Trout Brook Bridge Figure 16.1 Wheelock Parkway Arlington Avenue East. Figure 16.1 Trout BrookTrail Bridge Parkway Amenities and

Roadway & Corridor Improvements

Public Art Improvements

West Wheelock Parkway from North Rice Street to I35E includes reconstructing the roadway to 24 feet wide. Striping for this corridor will include two travel lanes. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights.

A corridor marker (P.3.13) will also be placed

Wayfinding Improvements

for the intersection of Grand Round and

Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Wheelock Parkway. Operational signage will be placed on the south east corner of West Wheelock Parkway and North Jackson Street.

Trout Brook Trail, once a navigable

West Wheelock Parkway from North Victoria Street to North Westminster Street is a 30 foot roadway with a 120 foot parkway.

A bike-able connection to Trout Brook Trail would need to follow

at the southeast corner of West Wheelock Parkway and North Rice Street. A future Gateway Node (P.1.6) is also programmed

connection is made.

Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include reconstructing and adding sidewalks and adding an off-road bike trail to the south side boulevard area. Sidewalks will be constructed as close to the parkway property

Wheelock Parkway Figure 16.2 Trout Brook Trail Bridge to I35E

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

5’

varies

12’

traffic lane

blvd

multi-use path

12’

16’

10’

120’ right-of-way

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016 Figure 16.2 W Wheelock Pkwy – Trout Brook Bridge to Agate St

blvd

varies

side walk

5’

E Larpenteur Ave

Wanda St

860

16.2

o 840

0 82 840

880 New Bike Trail

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

Raised Crossing Crosswalk

! ?

Proposed Roadway Ash Tree Road Closure

200

Placemaking 1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk Exist. Sidewalk

0 50 100

3.X Corridor Marker

1.X

Wayﬁnding 1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point 3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

870

N Sylvan St

880

W Hoyt St

Feet

MAP KEY

LEGEND

880

0 84

880 NORTH

Biglow La

850

840

N Jackson St

850

820

Wheel

W Iowa Ave

La ck

870

860

85 0

0 88

860

870

89 0

0 87

1.6

c eelo h W

E Wheelock Parkway

y Pkw

880

83 0

890

Timberlak8e Rd

r Wheelock D

WWheeloc Wheelock Parkway k Pkwy W

900

BePa PiGlBH > > > PiGlBH PiGlBH >PiGlBH PiGlBH > AbCo AcAut > AcPl > > > > > > > > >> PiGlBH ? ! > > > > >> AcPl ? > AcPlEL ! TiAmRe > > > ? ! > PiPuBl PiGlBH >> AcPlEL > > PiGlBH > > AcAut ? ! > ? ! > ? ! AcSn ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ! ? AcSn > ? AcPl > ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ! ?! ! ?! ?! ? ! ? ! ? ! ?> AcSn ! AcPl ? ?AcPlEL ?! > ! ? AcPlDe BeNi UlJa UlJa 880 TiAmRe > > > UlJa UlJa ? > ! AcPl ?TiAm ? ! ! ? ! ! ? UlPu > > ! ? ! ! ? > AcPlDe ! > > ? ! ! CeOc ? ! ? ?MaSpSS ?AcAut ?! ?! ?! ?> ! ! ? UlAm ? > > > ! > AcPlDe TiAmRe TiCoGr AcPl ? ! TiAm > > ? ! ? ! > AbCo > ? ! ? ! ? ! >AcPlDe AbCo AcAut >> ? ! ? ! > AcPl AbCo > PiRe >>> PiGlBH > >>MaSpSS > TiAmBo > ? ! PiRe > > TiAm 3.13 TiAm 3.25 ?> > ! > AcPlDe ? ! AcPlDe TiAmRe > JuVi ? ! > > TiAmRe > TiAmRe ? ! TiCoGr > TiAm TiAmRe TiAm > > > AcPlDe > TiAmRe > > UlAm > AcPl ? MaSpVP ! TiCoGr AcPlDe > > > MaSpVP TiAmRe ? ! TiAmSe > > > AcPlDe ? ! > AcPlDe TiAmSe > > AcPlDe ? ! > AcPl > AcPlDe > > AcPlDe> TiCoGr AcPl > > > AcPl TiAm AcPl > ? ! AcPlDe > > AcPl > TiCoGr UlAmPr AcPl > TiAmSe > > > TiAmRe > > > AcPlDe > ? ! ? ! AcSG TiCoGr > AcSG AcPlDe ? !

0 88

830

TiCoGr TiCoGr > TiCoGr ? PiGl>> > > > ! > TiAmRe UlAmPr > AcPlDe > AcPlDe > > AcPlDe ? ! ! ? > TiCoGr ? > > ! ! ? TiCoGr

| 5

88 0

Abell 90 St

Gurney St

860

16.1

200 Feet

870

840 0 85

G r a n d R o u88n0d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

870

0 89

840

100

Agate St

Abel St N

W Larpenteur Ave

200

April 18, 2016

Sylvan St N

Trout Brook to I35 v25

W Montana Ave

Map 16 - Wheelock Parkway

Trout Brook Trail to I-35

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 17 - Wheelock Parkway I-35 to Gateway Trail Existing Conditions West Wheelock Parkway from North Jackson Street to I35E is characterized as a formal corridor; East Wheelock Parkway from I35E to the Gateway Trail is characterized as a naturalistic corridor. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway with no on-street parking from North Rice Street to I35E Bridge. The prohibition of on-street parking is intermittently signed from I35E Bridge to North Arcade Street; very few on-street parking has been noted during the preparation of this plan. Sidewalks only exist along the south side of West Wheelock Parkway from North Rice Street to I35E. Wide, tree planted boulevards exist along Wheelock Parkway. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. West / East Wheelock Parkway also crosses I35E on a new Bridge. The bridge was designed with only a sidewalk along the south side. However, travel lanes were designed extra wide and a future sidewalk could be placed along the north side without jeopardizing the functionality of the travel lanes. An agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation would need to be executed prior to this change.

Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Wheelock Parkway. Operational signage will be placed on the south east corner of West / East Wheelock Parkway and I-35E. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include reconstructing and adding sidewalks and adding an off-road bike trail to the south side boulevard area. Sidewalks will be constructed as close to the parkway property lines as possible. The bike trail will be positioned between the roadway and south side sidewalk. The bike trail will be placed to allow adequate boulevard area for tree planting between both the sidewalk and bike trail and also between the bike trail and roadway. The bike trail will also have raised tabled crossing at North Edgemont Street.

shoulder traffic lane

8’

traffic lane

multi-use path

13’

9.5’

13’

34’ curb to curb 48’ bridge

Wheelock Parkway

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements

Figure 17.1 W Wheelock Pkwy – I35E Bridge

A corridor marker (P.3.14 & P.3.15) will be

Figure 17.1 I-35 Bridge

placed at the southwest corner of West Wheelock Parkway and I-35E and one at the northeast corner of East Wheelock Parkway and I-35E.

West / East Wheelock Parkway from North Jackson Street to the Gateway Trail is a 30 foot roadway with a 120 foot parkway.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements West / East Wheelock Parkway from North Jackson Street to the Gateway Trail includes reconstructing the roadway to 24 feet wide. Striping for this corridor will include two travel lanes. No on-street parking will be allowed. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights .

Wheelock Parkway Figure 17.2 I-35 Bridge to Gateway Trail

side walk

boulevard

traffic lane

blvd

bike trail

blvd

side walk

5’

varies

12’

20’

10’

14’

5’

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016 Figure 17.2 W Wheelock Pkwy – I35E Bridge to Gateway Trail

120’ right-of-way

Map 17 Wheelock Parkway I-35 to Gateway v25 April 18, 2016

200

| 5

880

860

850

0 85

17.1 850

860

0 84

EE Wheelock Wheelock Parkway Pkwy > TiSpp >

? ! ! ?

TiSpp ? !

? !

3.27

3.26

N Westminster St

3.14

840

850

TiCo > > TiCo QuPa > QuPa > AcSa > > ? PiSt >AcPl > ! TiAm ? !

860

N Edgemont St

? !

PiRe ? PiRe >PiRe ?>>! !

0 83

AcPl > ? BeNi > ! > BeNi BeNi ?> !

!! ? ?! ? ?! ?! ?! ? !

17.2

QuRu >

850

3.15

MaSpPF MaSpPF >>>> MaSpPF MaSpPF >>> > MaSpPF

E Wheelock Parkway

200 Feet

860

E Larpenteur Ave

BePa PiGlBH AcAut AcAut > RoPs ? ! PiGlBH > > PiGlBH >> ?RoPs ! > PiGlBH PiGlBH > > > > > > > > > >>RoPs > > >> > > >> > > PiGlBH >> > PiGlBH > > >> RoPs > > >AcAut PiGlBH > > AcAut > > > ! > AcPlCl ? ! > ? ! ? ! ! ? ?AcPlEL ? ?! ! ?! ! > ! ? ? ! AcPl ? BeNi> BeNi AcAut UlJa AcAut CeOc ? ?AcAut ?! ! ?> ! ! ?! ?! ? > > > > UlAm ! > ! ?! ?! ? AcRu > ? ! PiGlBH >

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

860

88 0

100

il Tr a tew

830

? !

PiPuBl > PiPuBl > >QuPa > > PiPuBl > > QuPa > QuPa > >

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk Raised Crossing Crosswalk

870

! ?

Proposed Roadway Ash Tree Road Closure

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

1.X

E Hoyt Ave

Placemaking

Wayﬁnding 1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point 3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

Map 17 - Wheelock Parkway

I-35 to Gateway Trail

830 830

N Arkwright St

New Bike Trail

200

Mississippi St

LEGEND

0 50 100

Lorient St

Feet

MAP KEY

850

Timberlake R

NORTH

840

850

N Sloan St

870

830

0 83

830

E Montana Ave

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 18 - Wheelock Parkway Gateway Trail to Edgerton Street Existing Conditions East Wheelock Parkway from the Gateway Trail to North Edgerton Street is characterized as a hybrid of a naturalistic corridor within the center median and formal corridor within the boulevards. The existing corridor includes a two lane roadway west of the Gateway Trail; east of the Gateway Trail the corridor separates to one-way travel systems. The prohibition of on-street parking is not signed from Gateway Trail to North Edgerton Street; very few on-street parking has been noted during the preparation of this plan. No sidewalks exists along East Wheelock Parkway from west of the Gateway Trail to just west of North Edgerton Street, where sidewalks exist on the south side for approximately seven homes. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. The Gateway Trail is a Minnesota Department of Natural Resource Regional Trail and passes over East Wheelock Parkway on a previous used railroad bridge. East Wheelock Parkway, westward from the Gateway Trail is a 30 foot roadway within a 120 foot parkway. East Wheelock Parkway, east of the Gateway Trail separates into two one-way systems separated by a large median. The one-way roadways are 20 feet wide within a total 120 foot wide parkway.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements East Wheelock Parkway west of the Gateway Trail Bridge includes reconstructing the roadway to 24 feet wide. Striping for this corridor will include two travel lanes. No on-street parking will be allowed. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights.

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

East Wheelock Parkway east of the Gateway Trail Bridge will maintain the one-way system by reconstructing two one-way roadways. The roadways will typically be 16 foot wide roadways; areas will be designed to allow pull-off areas for emergency vehicles or disabled vehicles, these areas will be designed to 20 feet wide. Roadway closures for pedestrian and bicyclist safety are recommended at East Wheelock Parkway and Parkway Drive.

panels, seating, bike repair station, and a potential public art component. A corridor marker (P.3.16) and a drinking fountain will be placed at the intersection of East Wheelock Parkway and North Edgerton Street.

Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement and branding will be placed along Wheelock Parkway. Mapping and Directional signage will be placed at the connection to the Gateway Trail. Operational signs will also be placed at the Gateway Trail intersection and also at the intersection of East Wheelock Parkway and North Edgerton Street.

Gateway Trail Bridge

Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include reconstructing and adding sidewalks and adding a 10 foot off-road bike trail. The off-road bike trail will be located within the south boulevard area west of the Gateway Trail and within the median area east of the Gateway Trail. Sidewalks will be constructed as close to the parkway property lines as possible. A raised tabled crossing for the trail will be installed across the median opening between the Gateway Trail and North Edgerton Street. An improved connection to the Gateway Trail is also planned along the northeasterly side of the Gateway Trail and East Wheelock Parkway.

side walk

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A Gateway Node (P.1.7) is programed for the northeast corner of East Wheelock Parkway and Gateway Trail. The Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map

5’

buffer traffic lane

3’

12’

Wheelock Parkway

Figure 18.1 W Wheelock Pkwy – Gateway Trail Bridge

traffic buffer bike buffer side lane trail walk

12’

2’ 10’ 3’

5’

Figure 18.1 Gateway Trail Bridge

200

April 18, 2016

100

De so t

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

18.1

Feet

0 50 100

Placemaking

1.X

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk Exist. Sidewalk

910

E Io

Raised Crossing

3.X Corridor Marker Wayﬁnding

1.X

1.X Major Decision Point

Crosswalk

2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

! ?

Ni Pl > > BeNi BeNi > ? !

ve aA

3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree

Cross Section Figure Number

Road Closure

85 0 1.7

he e

lock P

870

880

E Whe

r yD

18.2

kwy

elock

Parkw 9 a 8

0 89

AcPl >

920 910 AcPl AcPl > >AcPl AcPl PiPuBl > > > AcPl AcPl ! ? ? ! ? ! > AcSa >>>PiGlBH JuVi > ! > PiPuBl > > ? ! ? AcSa > ? ! ? AcSa > UlAmNH PiPuBl AcPl ! > > UlAmNH > UlAm > AcPl AcPl > > >AcSa > AcSa > AcGi ? > ! ? ! AcSa ! ?

920

Ave a d va

t ey S

radl

Gateway Trail to Edgerton Street

ra Neb

ve A a sk

18 - Wheelock Parkway

3.16

AcPl AcPl >AcPl > > > > SyRe > > > > > > AcSa > >> > > > > AbCo > > > > >> > >> > >> > > >>> > > AcSaGM >

rton

830 ap

3.28

dge NE

to eso

Ave a n o n ta

860

Gatew ay Tra

830

k wa

0 90

90 0

0 89

?> QuPa QuPa PiPuBl ! > QuPa > PiPuBl > > JuVi > > JuVi QuPa PiPuBl QuPa> > > QuPa > 900 ? QuRu ! QuPa > 900 > QuPa > > QuRu > QuPa > QuPa> ? AbCo ! QuPa> QuPa AbCo >> > QuPa QuPa > > QuPa> PiSt JuVi >> QuPa > QuPa PiSt >>! ? AcPl ? > > > QuPa ! PiSt > >> PiGl > X AcSG AcSa >PiGl >> > MaSpp > > JuVi AcSa > > AcPl AcSG MaSpp AcPl > > > AcSa AcPl AcPlCo > CrSp >> CrSp PiGl TiAm >> ? ! PiRe ? ! > AcPl > PiGl > PiGl> PiGl ?PiGl> > ! AcPl > AcPl X ? ! > > AcNe JuVi AcPl > PiSy > >>PiSy AcPl > ? > AcRu ! ? > AcSa ! > > 0 9 AcSa 8 0 0 ? !

Par

850

QuRu >

Ave t y Ho 90 0

0 84

200

ve eA

New Bike Trail 900

83 0

NORTH

910

a yn

ve A o ah E Id

860

92 0

MAP KEY

?! ! ?! ?! ?! ?! ?! ?

| 5

910

LEGEND

83 0

200 Feet

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

92 0

18 Wheelock Parkway way to Edgerton v25

G r a n d R o u nNdeD e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 19 - Wheelock Parkway Payne Avenue to Arcade Street Existing Conditions East Wheelock Parkway from North Edgerton Street to North Arcade Street is characterized as a hybrid of a naturalistic corridor within the center median and formal corridor within the boulevards. The existing corridor includes a separated one-way system. The prohibition of on-street parking is not signed from North Edgerton Street to North Arcade Street; very few on-street parking has been noted during the preparation of this plan. Sidewalks exist on both sides of the corridor from North Edgerton Street to North Arcade Street. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

Parkway and North Walsh Street, Walsh Street, and North Weide Street. The intersection configuration at East Wheelock Parkway and North Arcade Street will require further study and any modifications will require discussions with the Minnesota Department of Transportation.

East Wheelock Parkway one-way roadways are 20 feet wide within a 120 foot parkway. North Arcade Street is also US Highway 61.

Improvements include adding a 10 foot off-road bike trail to the median area between North Edgerton Street and North Arcade Street. The reconstruction of sidewalks will need to be analyzed during the final design as some sidewalk panels have settled; the sidewalks will remain along the parkway property lines. The bike trail will also have raised tabled crossings at North Greenbrier St.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements East Wheelock Parkway from North Edgerton Street to North Arcade Street includes reconstructing the roadways to west of the Gateway Trail Bridge includes reconstructing the roadway to 24 feet wide. Striping for this corridor will include two travel lanes. No onstreet parking will be posted. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights. East Wheelock Parkway from North Edgerton Street to North Arcade Street will maintain the one-way system by reconstructing two one-way roadways. The roadways will typically be 16 foot wide roadways; areas will be designed to allow pull-off areas for emergency vehicles or disabled vehicles, these areas will be designed to 20 feet wide. The pull-off areas will need to be identified during final design of the roadway. Roadway closures for the safety of the off-road bike trail are recommended through the median areas for East Wheelock

100

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements A Gateway Node (P.1.8) that serves as a welcome to Phalen Regional Park is programed for the northeast corner of East Wheelock Parkway and North Arcade Street. The Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map panels, seating, bike repair station, a potential drinking fountain, waste receptacles, and potential public art component. The node will take into account any Phalen Regional Park design standards and studies. This node can be constructed independently of any work on East Wheelock Parkway.

Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement, branding, and operational signs will be placed along East Wheelock Parkway. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements

Wheelock Parkway Figure 18.2 I-35 Gateway Trail Bridge to North Arcade Street

side blvd walk

5’ 5-10’

Due to the size of the intersection at East Wheelock Parkway and North Arcade Street corridor markers are programmed for both the northwest and southeast corners.

traffic lane

blvd

16’

varies

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016 Figure 18.2 W Wheelock Pkwy – Gateway Trail Bridge to N Arcade St

bike trail

blvd

10’

varies

120’ right-of-way

traffic lane with pull off area

20’

blvd side walk

5’

Map 19 Wheelock Parkway Payne to Arcade v25 April 18, 2016

Ave

910

0 91

NORTH

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

3.X Corridor Marker

Exist. Sidewalk

1.X

Raised Crossing

Wayﬁnding

ve A a n onta

900

3.X Reinforcement

910

Cross Section Figure Number

yD k wa Par

910

0 91 0 91 ? ! ? !

r St

910

brie reen

Road Closure

Ash Tree

alsh NW

2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

0 91

1.X Major Decision Point

Crosswalk

! ?

910

Placemaking

eide NW

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

200Ave

t Ho y

CeOc ? TiAm ! JuVi > > ? ! TiAm ? ! ? JuVi ! > >> TiAm > > TiAm > > > CeOc TiAm >TiAm CeOc

1.8 3.17

910

92 0

lock Pa

rkway

Ave d o o herw 900

Ave

e Whe

e ayn

E Whee

E Wheelock Pkwy

rcad

arkw P k c

900

3.18

AcSa > AcRu > > AcSa UlAm > > UlAmPr > AcSn AcSa > > AcSa AcSa AcSa > > > >> GyDi > AcGi > > > > QuEl JuVi AcGi AcPl PiSp 910 > > > > > GyDi > >>AbCo >> > > >>> AcPl >PiSp > AcSa QuEl > JuVi>>MaSpp >> > >> >> > > AcSa AcSa AcGi > UlAmNH > AcSa > > GyDi > AcSG UlAmPr > > AcAut > > AcSa >> UlAm > > AbCo AcPl AcPl > AcSa > > > > > AcAut > > > > PiSpp AcPl AcSa AcSa > > AcPl AcPl > AcPl > PiGl > > > > AcSa JuCi > AcPl AcPl > AcPl AcPl> > PsMe > > UlAm AcPl AcPl > AcSG AcSa AcSa PiGl AcPl PiSp PiGl > > > PiPu > > > > > AcSa > > > 910 AcPl AcSa >>>> 3.30 > > > > AcSa > > > AeGl > > AcSaGM > > JuCi AcPl > >AcPl > PiSp > > > > > PiGlBH > ? ! AcPl AcPl > AcPl JuCi AcRu > > >>PiGl > AcRu PiSpp> AcAut UlAm >UlAm > > > > > AcPl AcPl > CeOc > > > AcSa AcPl AcPl UlAm > > > > > > JuCi > > AcPl > UlAm > > > UlAm JuCi UlAm PiSp PiSp AcPl > TiAmRe> > > ! AcPl > > AcPl ?QuEl AcSaGM > > > > UlAm > GlTr UlAm AcPl > > AcPl AcPl > AcPl AcPl AcPl AcPl AcPl >AcPl > > > >> > AcSG > > > GyDi AcPl AcPl > > > AcPl > > ? ! > > UlAm > TiAmRe QuEl > > > > > > AcPl AcSa SyRe > >AbCo GyDi GyDi > > AcPl AcPl > > >> > > > > > > PiGl >UlAm > >> GyDi PiAb > > TiAmRe AcPl > JuCi > AcPl AcPl PiGl > >> > > > MaSpp >PiAb > > UlAm PiGl> AcPl > AcSaGM > AcSa > PiAb ? ! > > > > PiAb MaSpp AcPl > > AcPl AcPl > > PiGl > 3.29 > AcSa > QuRu > AcPl GyDi > PiAb > PiGl 900 > > >> > > >> > > > AcPl AbCo AcSa > AcPl AcPl > > > >>> > > > > > GyDi MaSpp > MaSpp MaSpp > > 900 AcPl > > AcPl AcSaGM AcAut > GyDi > AcAut

3.31

Ave a QuEl 18.2 d a> > GyDi > NevGyDi

? !

900

New Bike Trail

0 50 100

910

Feet

MAP KEY

LEGEND

| 5

910

910 E

a Io w

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

900

dge

920

rton St

Ave n o t g Arlin

Map 19 - Wheelock Parkway

Payne Avenue to Arcade Street

ot EC

ve A e ta g

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

101

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 20 - Wheelock Parkway Arcade Street to Lake Phalen Existing Conditions East Wheelock Parkway from North Arcade Street to Phalen Drive is characterized as a naturalistic corridor. This area transects Phalen Regional Park with Phalen Golf Course on the north side and green open spaces and Phalen Recreation Center ballfields along the south side. The existing corridor includes a separated one-way system. No on-street parking is allowed through this area. The shoulders are identified with a white stripe. City staff has indicated the difficulties of maintaining median trees due to winter accidents. The existing street lighting, shoebox style lighting for the roadway, has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement, branding, and operational signs will be placed along East Wheelock Parkway. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include adding a 10 foot off-road bike trail to the northerly boulevard area along with a 5 foot wide sidewalk. The sidewalk along the southerly boulevard area will remain in place. The two boulevard areas between the proposed sidewalk and bike trail and roadway will have ample width to plant grass and trees. A crosswalk is programmed to connect the two sidewalks at the entrance to Phalen Recreation Center.

A multi-use trail exists within the south boulevard area and continues to Phalen Drive where it crosses East Wheelock Parkway and then winds northeasterly towards Lake Phalen. The trail intersects with a one-way bike trail and a pedestrian trail which both circumnavigate Lake Phalen. East Wheelock Parkway one-way roadways are 22 feet wide.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Expansion to the north or south is difficult due the proximity of Phalen Golf Course and the topography along the southerly boulevard area. The proposed roadway for East Wheelock Parkway from North Arcade Street to Phalen Drive includes reconstructing the roadway to a 24 foot wide roadway. This will also include separated off-road bike and pedestrian trails to be constructed on the north side between the proposed roadway and Phalen Golf Course. No on-street parking will be allowed. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights.

102

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Wheelock Parkway Figure 20.1 North Arcade Street to Phalen Drive

side blvd walk

5’

6’

bike trail

blvd

10’

6’

traffic lane

blvd

side walk

12’

varies

5’

60-100’ right-of-way

Figure 20.1 E Wheelock Pkwy – N Arcade St to Phalen Dr

Map 20_Wheelock Parkway Arcade to Lake Phalen v25

200

100

890

88 0

910

elo

Ave k c lo hee

Ave

900

t St

890

900

e Av tta g

o r es

MAP KEY

LEGEND New Bike Trail Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

90 0

Ave r a Cle

Raised ve Crossing y ACrosswalk v I E

1.X

0 88

200

Placemaking 1.X Gateway Node 3.X Corridor Marker

1.X

Wayﬁnding

1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point 3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree Road Closure

0 50 100

2.x Interpretive Node

Proposed Roadway

! ?

Arcade Street to Lake Phalen

Feet

New Sidewalk Exist. Sidewalk

Map 20 - Wheelock Parkway

? !

890

o EC

EW AcSG ? ! > AcSG QuRu > he > QuRu > eQuRu l > c QuRu >o QuRu >k > QuRu >P>a>rQuRu QuRu k w a y

0 88

NORTH

rcad

ta S

o end

od rwo

0 88

> >

890

> AcSa

88 0

20.1

88 0

e E Wh

900

arkw P k c

890

0 87

86 0

88 0

0 88

? !

ock P!?kwy E!?Wheel ? ! ? !

890

| 5

len Pha

CeOc > CeOcCeOc > > ? ! QuMa > TiAm GlTr > ?> ! ? ! PiSpp ? PiSpp ! QuMa >PiSpp >>> MaSpp > TiAm > > > MaSpp > ? AbCo MaSpp ! >> >>>> > PiGlBH > > > ? ! PiSpp PiSpp MaSpp PiGlBH > > > ? ! > > PiGlBH > >> PiNi >> ? PiNi > PiNi ? ! ! MaSpp > > PiNi > > MaSpp PiNi QuMa > > > ? > MaSpp > PiNi ? ! ! > PiAb > > PiNi PiAb ? ! PiMu > > ? ! >> PiNi PiNi > > > >> MaSpp PiMu ? ! >>>> PiNi >>PiMu > >> > >>>> > >> PiAb ? ! MaSppPiAb >PiAb PiMu ? ! ? ! MaSpp > >> PiSy> >PiAb ?PiSy ? ! ?! ! > > > PiSt ? ! > > JuVi PiSt > CeOc ? ! > PiSy MaSpp JuVi > > TiAm > PiSt ? ! ? ! TiAm ? CeOc ! > >>TiAm TiAm > JuVi > > > > TiAm >TiAm CeOc

200 eet

0 88

88 0

0 90

0 91

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

April 18, 2016

900 F

Cross Section Figure Number

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

103

? !

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 21 - Wheelock Parkway at Lake Phalen Existing Conditions East Wheelock Parkway from Phalen Drive to East Shore Drive is characterized as a naturalistic corridor. This area transects Phalen Regional Park with Lake Phalen on the north side and green open spaces along the south side. The corridor does become very narrow between East Ivy Avenue and Lake Phalen. The existing corridor includes a separated one-way system for the westerly half and on the easterly half two travel lanes. No on-street parking is allowed through this area. No sidewalks exist on the south side of the corridor. A pedestrian path along with a one-way bike trail exist between East Wheelock Parkway and Lake Phalen. The existing street lighting, shoebox style lighting for the roadway, has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

Wayfinding Improvements

Trail & Sidewalk Improvements

Corridor reinforcement, branding, and operational signs will be placed along East Wheelock Parkway and also within Phalen Regional Park. Directional signs will be placed at East Wheelock Parkway and Phalen Drive and also within the park for destinations within and around Phalen Regional Park. Any signage proposed within Phalen Regional Park will require coordination with Phalen Regional Park sign standards.

Improvements include adding a 5 foot wide sidewalk to the south side of East Wheelock Parkway from Phalen Drive to East Maryland Avenue. The existing pedestrian trail and bike trail from Phalen Drive to East Shore Drive will be modified to 10 foot wide pedestrian trail and a 12 foot wide two-way bike trail. The remaining trail system around Lake Phalen requires additional study for the potential of future expansion. The two boulevard areas between the proposed pedestrian path and bike trail and roadway will have ample width to plant grass and trees.

A multi-use trail exists within the south boulevard area, west of Phalen Drive, at Phalen Drive the trail crosses East Wheelock Parkway and then winds northeasterly towards Lake Phalen. The trail intersects with a one-way bike trail and a pedestrian trail which both circumnavigate Lake Phalen. East Wheelock Parkway one-way roadways are 22 feet wide and the two lane area is 37 feet wide.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements Expansion to the north or south is difficult due the proximity of trails on the west side of Lake Phalen and the limited parkway on the south side. The proposed roadway for East Wheelock Parkway from Phalen Drive to Johnson Parkway includes reconstructing the roadway to a 24 foot wide roadway. No on-street parking will be allowed. Lighting will be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights.

ped. trail

blvd

bike trail

blvd

traffic lane

10’ varies 12’ varies 12’

traffic lane

blvd

side walk

12’

varies

5’

right-of-way varies

East Wheelock Parkway

Figure 21.1 E Wheelock Pkwy – Phalen Dr to approximately E Ivy Ave

Figure 21.1 Phalen Drive to approximately East Ivy Avenue

104

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

lake

ped. trail

blvd

bike trail

10’

12’

blvd

10’

traffic lane

blvd

side walk

12’

10’

5’

right-of-way varies Figure 21.2 E Wheelock Pkwy – southwest side of Lake Phalen

East Wheelock Parkway Figure 21.2 Southwest side of Lake Phalen

Map 21_Wheelock Parkway at Lake Phalen v25 April 18, 2016

200

100

200 Feet

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

| 5 860

Lake Phalen

870

Eas

t Sh

ore D r

len Pha Dr

21.1

880

2.13

2.12

> > >

0 88

> QuRu > QuRu

3.32

870

>> >

? !

21.2

0 88

y E Iv

NORTH

Ave

QuMa >QuMa > QuMa >

Ash Tree Road Closure

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node 3.X Corridor Marker

880

Wayﬁnding 1.X Major Decision Point

cin Hya

Ave

0 88

860

2.X Minor Decision Point 3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

Map 21 - Wheelock Parkway

ve A e rang

h ulut

Proposed Roadway

Placemaking

Lake Phalen

2.14

Joh n Joh so

AcPl >AcPl > AcPl >AcPl > > AcPl > AcPl AcPl >AcPl >

wy Pk wy n n Pk o

Crosswalk

1.X

TiSpp >

GyDi >

880 0 88

Raised 8 Crossing

200

Exist. Sidewalk

t arl S

890

New Sidewalk

1.X

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

0 50 100

kS ran NF

New Bike Trail

Feet

86 0

860

MAP KEY

LEGEND

! ?

E Wheelock Parkway

? !

900

? !

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

> > >

105

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 22 - Wheelock Parkway Lake Phalen to Phalen Boulevard Existing Conditions

Wayfinding Improvements

The roadways of East Wheelock Parkway and Johnson Parkway north of East Maryland Avenue are separated one-ways with tree and grass planted medians; these roadway corridors are characterized as naturalistic corridors. Dedicated left and right turn lanes exist for traffic at both East Shore Drive and also at East Maryland Avenue. Southbound Johnson Parkway from East Shore Drive to East Maryland Avenue is a two lane roadway which reduces to a one lane roadway between East Maryland Avenue and Phalen Boulevard. Northbound Johnson Parkway from North Prosperity Avene / Phalen Boulevard to East Maryland Avenue increases from a one lane to a two lane roadway. Shoulders are striped for both directions.

Corridor reinforcement, branding, and operational signs will be placed along East Wheelock Parkway and Johnson Parkway. A directional sign will be placed at the southeast corner of Johnson Parkway and North Prosperity Avenue / Phalen Boulevard for Ames Lake Park.

Sidewalks do not exist along the west side of this corridor. The Bruce Vento Trail intersects between East Shore Drive and East Maryland Avenue and provides a multi-use trail to Lake Phalen to the north and Johnson Parkway to the south. The existing street lighting, shoebox style lighting for the roadway, has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

A Gateway Node (P.1.9) that will serve as a welcome to Phalen Regional Park is programed on the south side of Lake Phalen between East Shore Drive and East Maryland Avenue. The Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map panels, seating, bike repair station, potential drinking fountain, waste receptacles, and public art. The node will take into account any Phalen Regional Park design standards and studies. This node can be constructed independently of any work on East Wheelock Parkway or Johnson Parkway.

East Wheelock Parkway one-way roadways are 22 feet wide and the two lane area is 37 feet wide.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements No major improvements are planned for this area. To be consistent with the Grand Round it is recommended that when improvements are complete to remove the shoulders. The remaining roadway configuration should remain as is. No on-street parking will continue. Lighting should be improved within this area to include the typical Saint Paul Lantern Style lights.

Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements include adding a 5 foot wide sidewalk to the west side of East Wheelock Parkway and Johnson Drive to from Phalen Drive to Magnolia Lane. The multi-sue Bruce Vento Trail will remain as is. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements

Corridor markers (P.3.19 & P.3.20) are also programmed for southeast corner of Johnson Parkway and East Maryland Avenue and for the northeast corner of Johnson Parkway and North Prosperity Avenue / Phalen Boulevard.

Wheelock Parkway Figure 22.1 East Maryland Avenue to Phalen Boulevard

side blvd walk

traffic lane

5’ varies 13’

center lane

traffic lane

blvd

12’

13’

6’

right-of-way varies

106

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016 Figure 22.1 Johnson Pkwy – E Maryland Ave to Phalen Blvd

multi- blvd use trail

10’ varies

April 18, 2016

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Cross Section Figure Number

Pk > > wy

> >

860

Lake Phalen to Phalen Boulevard

880

E Magnolia Ave

eP n a L

E Jessamine Ave

y Pk w E Whe eloc k

Map 22 - Johnson Parkway

86 0

0 87

ist S u q n Bur

N Atlantic St

E Cook Ave

> >

AcAut AcAut AcAut AcPlAcAut AcPl AcPl AcPl

AcAut AcAut AcPl

on ns

Magno lia La

l en B lvd

870

860

AcPl AcPl AcPl AcPl AcPl AcPl AcPl AcPl

1.9

AcAut

Pha

> >

r Sho st AcPl AcPl

> >> > > > > > > >

860

3.19 AcPl

860

870

d Ave E M a rylan

0 87

QuMa UlAmPr QuMa MaSpRS MaSpRS MaSpRS MaSpRS MaSpPn MaSpPn MaSpRS 3.20 MaSpRS MaSpRS MaSpPn 860 MaSpRS MaSpRS MaSpPn AcMi MaSpPn PiGlBH MaSpPn AcMi AcAut PiGlBH AcAut AcMi AcMi PiGlBH AcAut AcMi PiGlBH AcAut PiGlBH AcMi AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut AcAut

22.1

Road Closure

2.15

880

3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree

! ?

Proposed Roadway

UlAmPr UlAmPr UlAmPr UlAmPr

? >> ! > > >> > > >> > > ? >> > ! > > > > > > >

2.X Minor Decision Point

CeOc

Crosswalk

860

1.X Major Decision Point

e Av

Wayﬁnding

1.X

CeOc

860

3.X Corridor Marker

rit pe

2.x Interpretive Node

MaSpp

!! ? ? ? > ! ? ! ? ! ? ?! ! ? ! > ! ? ! ? ? ! ? > ! ? ! ? ! > ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ?! ! ? ? ! ? ?! ! > ? ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ! ? > ?! ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ! ? ? ! ? ?! ! ? ! ! ? ! ? ?! !

1.X Gateway Node

Raised Crossing

| 5

Placemaking

1.X

New Sidewalk Exist. Sidewalk

200

860

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

0 50 100

La c i p New Bike Trail To

LEGEND

Feet

E Geranium Ave

86 0

N Clarence St MAP KEY

200 Feet

860

NORTH

850

880

100

200

Map 22_Johnson Parkway Lake Phalen to Phalen Blvd v25

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

107

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 23 - Johnson Parkway Phalen Boulevard to East 7th Street Existing Conditions Johnson Parkway from North Prosperity Avenue / Phalen Boulevard to East 7th Street is characterized as a hybrid of a designed corridor through the business district and a naturalistic corridor in the remaining area. The roadway is flanked on both sides by sidewalks; a wider sidewalk exists on the west side of the roadway. The parkway width through this areas varies; most of the parkway is planted with grass and trees. No on-street parking is allowed through this area. The existing street lighting has been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting. Johnson Parkway from North Prosperity Avenue / Phalen Boulevard to East 7th Street is an existing 38 foot wide roadway within a 180 foot parkway. The roadway is a two lane roadway with bike lanes striped on both sides. The parkway or right-of-way narrows to 60 feet wide from the Railroad Bridge to East 7th Street; the roadway in this area is 44 feet wide and is striped for two travel lanes, a center turn lane and bike lanes.

wide bike trail and a 5 foot wide sidewalk; this can be completed independently of any roadway reconstruction. Boulevard areas north of the railroad bridge will be ample sized to accommodate grass and tree plantings. Improvements from the Railroad Bridge to East 7th Street include converting the sidewalk to a multi-use trail until the roadway is reconstructed. When the roadway is reconstructed bike trail and sidewalk improvements will include converting the multi-use trail to an off-road bike trail and sidewalk with smaller buffers between each facility. The crosswalk at Johnson Parkway and East Ames Avenue and the entrance to Hmong Village Shopping Center will

remain. Additional study of this intersection maybe required due to the high use into and out of the Hmong Village Shopping Center. Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements An interpretive node (P.2.6) that might include picnic amenities, bike racks, and public art could be placed on the west side of Johnson Parkway. This will provide both Grand Round and Hmong Village Shopping Center users a place to stop and shop and enjoy refreshments in a park setting. An opportunity for public art (P.3.21) also exists below the railroad bridge. Corridor markers (P.3.22 & P.3.23) are programed for the southwest and northeast corners of Johnson Parkway and East 7th Street. rail road bridge

rail road bridge

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements To be consistent with the Grand Round it is recommended that when improvements are completed along Johnson Parkway is to reconstruct the two travel lanes to 26 feet wide and provide center turn lanes at East Ames Avenue and at East 7th Street. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement, branding, and operational signs will be placed along Johnson Parkway. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements

side buf- bike walk fer lane

traffic lane

8’ 1’3’ 6’

12’

bike buf- multilane fer use trail

6’ 3’ 1’ 8’

side bufwalk fer

traffic lane

8’ 1’1’ 13’

60’ right-of-way

Improvements along the east side of Johnson Parkway from Johnson Parkway Figure 23.1 Railroad Bridge North Prosperity Avenue / Phalen Boulevard to theFigure Railroad 23.1 Johnson Pkwy – Railroad Bridge: Multi-use Trail Improvements Bridge include reconstructing the existing sidewalk to a 10 foot Mutli-Use Trail improvements

108

13’

buffer

side walk

2’ 10’ 3’ 1’ 8’

60’ right-of-way

Johnson Parkway

Figure 23.2 Railroad Bridge -

Roadway & trail improvements

Figure 23.2 Johnson Pkwy – Railroad Bridge: Roadway and Trail Improvements

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

traffic buffer bike lane trail

N ClarenceGStr a n d

CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc 3.23 CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc

>> >

? ! ! ? ? ! ? ! ?> !

3.22

>> > > > > >

? !

CeOc CeOc CeOc

CeOc

> >> >

880

CeOc CeOc

CeOc

860

lvd

880

860

0 86

860

86 0

860

Ph ale

E 7th St

870

MaSpp

Johnson Pa CeOc CeOc rkwMaSpp ay CeOc

880

870

880

3.35

? !

ns on Pk

3.34

3.33

| 5

> >> ? ! > > > >>

880

J oh

3.21

23.3, 23.4 8

0 89

>>> ? ! ?> ! ? ! ? >!

2.6

890

>> > >> > ! ? >>

? ! ?? ! !! ? ? ?! ! ? ?! ! ? ! ?? ! ?! ?! ?! !

23.1, 23.2

88 0

880

E Stillwater Ave

880

UlAmPr

R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

900

E York Ave

! ? ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! > ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ! ?! ?! ! ? ? > ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ! ? > ?! ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ! ? ? ! ? ?! ! ? ! ! ? ! ? ?! ! ? ?! ?! ! ? ! > ? ! ? ?! ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ! ? > ?! !

Johnson Parkway

88 0

Ave

> >

200 Feet

880

rity

Ave

as e

CeOc CeOc

pe Pr o s

CeOc CeOc

CeOc CeOc CeOc

Ave mes EA

880 CeOc CeOc

April 18, 2016

860

MaSpp

100

200

E Ross Ave

Map 23_Johnson Parkway Phalen Blvd to E 7th v25

Ocean St

870 multiAtlantic side bike traffic center traffic N bike walk lane lane turn lane lane lane use

3.X Corridor Marker Wayﬁnding 1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

3.X Reinforcement

Ash Tree Road Closure

870

Crosswalk

Cross Section Figure Number

8’

11’

10’

Johnson Parkway 88 0Multi-use Figure 23.3 Johnson Pkwy – Railroad Bridge to E 7th St: Improvements ridge to Trailast th treet

Phalen Boulevard to East 7th Street

11’

6’

trail

8’

870 side buf- traffic walk fer lane

5’ 2’

13’

60’ right-of-way

Map 23 - Johnson Parkway

6’

Figure 23.3 Railroad

870 870 traffic blvd bike lane trail

13’

6’

10’

blvd

side walk 870

6’

5’

60’ right-of-way

Johnson Parkway 88 0

1.X

870

E Cook Ave

Raised Crossing

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk Exist. Sidewalk

Placemaking

0 87

! ?

1.X

0 87

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

200 870

0 87

New Bike Trail

0 50 100

880

LEGEND

Feet

870

MAP KEY

880

0 86

NORTH

Figure 23.4 Railroad Bridge

to Eand astTrail 7th Street - Roadway & trail Improvements - Figure Multi se TPkwy rail– Railroad Bridge to E 7th St: Roadway 23.4-U Johnson Improvements

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

109

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 24 - Johnson Parkway East 7th Street to Margaret Street Existing Conditions Johnson Parkway from East 7th Street to East Margaret Street is characterized as a hybrid of a naturalistic corridor within the medians and formal corridor within the boulevard along the frontage roads. A sidewalks does exist along the east side of Johnson Parkway from East 7th Street to Bush Avenue; they do not exist along the rest of the corridor. The roadway is typically flanked on both sides by wide medians and frontage roads, with the exception from East 7th Street to Bush Avenue where the frontage road only exists on the west side. No on-street parking is along the mainline of Johnson Parkway; parking is allowed along the frontage roads. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements along Johnson Parkway can be completed in different stages and they are:

reconstruction. At the time of adding sidewalks the multi-use trail should be converted to a bike only trail.

Trail Improvements will provide a 12 foot wide multi-use trail along the east side of Johnson Parkway from East 7th Street to East Margaret Street. Roadway closures for the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists are recommended for East Ross Avenue, East Bush Avenue, East Reaney Avenue, and East Margaret Street. However, it is recommended that a study of any road closure be completed prior to final design of the trail improvements.

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements Corridor markers (P.3.24 & P.3.25) are programed for the southeast and northwest corners of Johnson Parkway and East Minnehaha Avenue.

5 foot wide sidewalks can be added along the outer side of the frontage roads, more than likely completed at the time of roadway

Johnson Parkway, mainline, from East 7th Street to East Margaret Street is an existing 38 foot wide roadway within a 180 foot parkway. The roadway is a two lane roadway with bike lanes striped on both sides.

blvd

front road

boulevard

bike lane

traffic lane

bike lane

blvd

12’

18’

41’

6’

13’

6’

varies

180’ right-of-way

Johnson Parkway

24.1 E

astImprovements th treet Figure 24.1 Johnson Parkway – E 7thigure St to Wakefield Ave: Trail

110

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Wakefeild Avenue - Trail Improvements

multi-use boulevard trail

12’

varies

front road

blvd

18’

12’

200 Feet

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

April 18, 2016

| 5

N Clarence St

890

880

? >> ! > >> >

? !

> > > > > >> > >

> > > > >

? !

> > > > > >

> >> >> > > ? !

> >> ! ? > > > >> >>

> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >>

>> > > > > > > > > >

> >

880

E Beech St

870

Johnson Parkway

> >> > > >>

> >> > > >

> > > >

>>>

> >> > >> > >> >

? ! ! ? ? !

> > >

>> > > > ? ! > > > >> >

? !

E Reaney Ave

E Minnehaha Ave

? ! ! ?

! ? ? !

? ? ! !

? !

>> > ? ! ? ! > >

? !

> > >

? !

> > >>

? !

880

E Bush Ave

86 0

2.16

880

860

RoPs

Johnson Pkwy ! > ? ? >> !

> >

? ! ! ? >

> ? ! >

GyDi 3.36

880

E Ross Ave

0 86

24.1, 24.2

AcNe PiNi CeOc PiNi PiNi MaSpBu MaSpSS MaSpDW GlTr CaSp PiNi AcPl AcPl CaSp SyRe CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc GlTr GlTr CaSp CaSp MaSpSF 3.25 PiNi CaSp SyRe TiAmSe PiNi CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc 3.37 GlTr CaSp QuRu UlAmNH CeOc CaSp MaSpDW UlAmNH CeOc AcAut MaSpp QuMa QuMa GyDi UlSp PoDe AcPl AcPl PiNi CaSp PiNi UlAmNH TiSpp GyDi GyDi PiRe QuMa MaSpSF MaSpTh PiNi AcPl GyDi JuNi JuNi TiSpp MaSpp QuRu CeOc CeOcPiRe CeOc PiSpp PiNi CeOc PiNi QuMa GyDi GyDi 3.24 MaSpDW CaSp CaSp CeOc GyDi MaSpBu PiNi AcAut TiSpp GyDi GyDi CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc AcPl AcPl TiSpp TiSpp TiSpp TiSpp TiSpp TiSpp TiSpp TiSpp PrSp TiSpp 8

> >

AcPl

? !! ? ?! > > ? ! > ? ! ! ? ? ! > ? ! ! ? ? ! !! ? ? > ! ! ? ? ? ! ? ! ! ? ?! ?! ?! ?! ?! ?! ? ! ?! ? ?! > ! > >> >> >

rkw

? ! ! ?

> >> >

n Pa

> > >>

nso

! ? ? ! ? ?! ! ? ! ? ? ? ! ?! ! ?! !

>> > > > > > >

>> >

? !

> >> ? ! > > > >>

>> > >> > ! ? >>

Joh

880

89 0

? ! ! ? ? ! ? ! ?> !

>>> ? ! ?> ! ? ! ? >!

CeOc 890 CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc MaSpp PiSpp MaSpp PiSpp MaSpp CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc CeOc AcAut 860 AcAut CeOc

88 0

0 88

870

E Stillwater Ave

100

200

Map 24_Johnson Parkway E 7th to E 6th v25

0 87

870

N Atlantic St

NORTH

E Margaret St

E 7th St

LEGEND 0 87

New Bike Trail Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

Exist. Sidewalk Raised Crossing Crosswalk

! ?

87 0

East 7th Street to Margaret Street

900

Proposed Roadway Ash Tree

Road Closure

0 50 100

200

Placemaking 1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

Newcombe St

Map 24 - Johnson Parkway

Feet

0 89

88 0

0 89 MAP KEY

E 6th St

870

3.X Corridor Marker

1.X

Wayﬁnding 1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point 3.X Reinforcement Cross Section Figure Number

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

111

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 25 - Johnson Parkway Margaret Street to Euclid Street Existing Conditions Johnson Parkway from East Margaret Street to East Euclid Street is characterized as a hybrid of a naturalistic corridor within the medians and formal corridor within the boulevard along the frontage roads. Sidewalks do not exist along the corridor. The roadway is flanked on both sides by wide medians and frontage roads. No on-street parking is along the mainline of Johnson Parkway; parking is allowed along the frontage roads. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements Avenue, East Conway Street. However, it is recommended that a study of any road closure be completed prior to final design of the trail improvements. 5 foot wide sidewalks will be added along the outer side of the frontage roads. The use of the multi-use trail should be analyzed at the time of adding sidewalk to consider converting the multi-use trail to a bike only trail.

A corridor marker is programed for the northeast corner of Johnson Parkway and East 6th Street, the southeast and northwest corners of Johnson Parkway and East 3rd Street, and the northeast corner of Johnson Parkway and East Wilson Avenue. The intersections of Johnson Parkway and East 6th Street, and East Fremont Avenue and Euclid Street are intersections recommended to be closed, thereby allowing additional parkland for parkway amenities and public art.

Johnson Parkway, mainline, from East Margaret Street to East Euclid Street is an existing 38 foot wide roadway within a 180 foot parkway. The roadway is a two lane roadway with bike lanes striped on both sides.

Proposed Improvements Roadway & Corridor Improvements To be consistent with the Grand Round when road reconstruction of Johnson Parkway is planned, it is recommended to reconstruct the two travel lanes to 26 feet wide. Wayfinding Improvements Corridor reinforcement, branding, and operational signs will be placed along Johnson Parkway. Trail & Sidewalk Improvements Improvements along Johnson Parkway can be completed in different stages and they are: Trail Improvements will provide a 12 foot wide multi-use trail along the east side of Johnson Parkway from East Margaret Street to East Euclid Street. Roadway closures for the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists are recommended for East 5th Street, East Fremont

side blvd walk

5’

7’

front road

boulevard

traffic lane

boulevard

bike trail

boulevard

front road

18’

46’

13’

varies

12’

varies

18’

180’ right-of-way

Johnson Parkway

Figure 24.2 East 7th Street to Wakefeild Avenue - Road Improvements

Figure 24.2 Johnson Parkway – E 7th St to Wakefield Ave: Roadway Improvements

112

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

blvd side walk

7’

5’

200

100

200 Feet

Map 25_Johnson Parkway Margaret to Euclid v25

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

April 18, 2016

| 5

N Clarence St

880 880

24.1, 24.2 QuRu

870

> >> >>

3.X Reinforcement

Road Closure

Cross Section Figure Number

0 88

Map 25 - Johnson Parkway Margaret Street to Euclid Street

ock

> > > > > > >

? !

> >>

EE ucli

? !

2.X Minor Decision Point

Proposed Roadway

N Griffith St

Crosswalk Ash Tree

840

1.X Major Decision Point

1.X

900

! ?

3.X Corridor Marker Wayﬁnding

AeGl AeGl AeGl

860

Raised Crossing

1.X Gateway Node 2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk Exist. Sidewalk

Placemaking

E Conway St

1.X

0 85

Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

New Bike Trail

E 3rd St

LEGEND

860

0 89

a tzi o G

? !

? > > !

N Atlantic St

nP ar ? !

880

>> >

>> > > ? ! > > > >> > > > > >

>> > >

>> > > > >

? !

> > >

> > > >

? !

> > ? > > ! > >> > >> > >

> >> > > ? >> ! >> > >

> >

? >> !

> >> >

> > > > > > > ! ?

>>> >>> >

> > > ? !

?> !

> >> >>

>> > > >

? !

? > ! > > >

> >> ? ! > >

E 4th St

E Fremont Ave

? !

E 5th St

>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >

> > > > ? ! > >> >> > > > > > > > ? >>> ! >

> >>> > >> ? > ! > > ? ! > >

>> >

>> >>

? >> ! > >> > > >> >>

E 6th St

? !

> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >

> > > > >

? !

> >> ! ? > > > >> >>

> >> >> > > ? !

Johnson Pkwy

870

E Margaret St

> > >>

Johnson Parkway

N English St

860

> > > > > >

PiRe PiRe UlPu UlPu UlPu PiSy AcAut UlPu UlPu MaSpPr CeOc MaSpp MaSpBu PiNi 3.38 PiNi AcPl PiSt UlPu UlPu 3.26 UlPu PiNi UlPu UlPu 3.39 PiSt PiNi UlPu 3.28 UlPu SyRe AcPl QuRu AcPl UlPu PiNi AcPl UlPu UlPu UlPu AcArm CaSp AcAut UlPu UlPu QuRu 3.40 PiNi PiNi CeOc TiAmSe AmCaAB MaSpp UlPu AcAut UlPu AcPl AcPl AcPl UlPa QuRu UlPu UlPu CaSp SyRe CeOc UlPu UlAmNH QuRu AcAut CeOc UlPu UlPu PiSy UlPu UlPu MaSpp QuMa PiSy UlSp GyDi UlPu AcPl CeOc MaRR QuRu MaRR UlPu QuMa PiNi PiNi UlPu PiNi PiNi AcAut AcPl 3.27 UlPu UlPu UlPu PiSy AcPl MaSpp QuRu CeOc AcPl PiNi AcPl AcAut AcPl UlPu UlPu CeOc PiNi CeOc UlPu CaSp TiSpp QuMa PiNi PiNi MaSpBu UlPu AcPl AcPl CeOc MaSpSS AcSa AcSa AcPl AcSa AcPl TiSpp UlPu AcSa UlPu AcSa AcRu TiCoGr TiCoGr AcPl UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu TiSpp UlPu UlPu CeOc UlPu UlPu AcPl 880 UlPu UlPu AcPl AcPl UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu AcNe UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu AcPl UlPu AcPlCk UlPu UlPu TiSpp AcPl TiSpp AcPlCk AcSG TiSpp GiBi GiBi AcPl AcSG UlPu 3.41 AcPl AcSG AcPl UlPu GiBi UlPu UlPu 3.29 TiSpp TiSpp UlPu UlPu TiSpp TiSpp QuRu UlPu 860 QuRu UlSp UlAmPr UlSp UlSp AmCaAB TiCo NORTH UlSp 890 UlAmPr CeOc CeOc AmCaAB AmCaAB 0 50 100 200 AcPl Feet MAP KEY AcPl

870

? > ! > > > >> > > > > > >>

AcPl

> >> ! ? >>

BePa

> > >>> >

AcNe

E Wilson Ave

88 0

890 880

0 89

850

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

113

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 26 - Johnson Parkway Euclid Street to Burns Street Existing Conditions

Parkway Amenities and Public Art Improvements

Johnson Parkway from East Euclid Street to East Burns Street is characterized as a hybrid of a naturalistic corridor within the medians and formal corridor within the boulevard along the frontage roads. Sidewalks only exist on both sides of Johnson Parkway, below the I94 Bridge, between Wakefield Avenue and Hudson Road. Johnson Parkway on both sides of the I94 Bridge is flanked on both sides by wide medians and frontage roads. No onstreet parking is along the mainline of Johnson Parkway; parking is allowed along the frontage roads. The existing street lighting has not been updated to reflect the typical Saint Paul Lantern style lighting.

East Burns Street. Roadway closure for the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists is recommended for Wakefield Avenue. However, it is recommended that a study of any road closure be completed prior to final design of the trail improvements. A 10 foot wide cycle track is proposed below the I94 Bridge to provide separation for pedestrians and bicyclists. 5 foot wide sidewalks can be added along the outer side of the frontage roads, to be completed at the time of roadway reconstruction. At the time of adding sidewalks the multi-use trail should be converted to a bike only trail.

Johnson Parkway, mainline, from East Euclid Street to East Burns Street is an existing 38 foot wide roadway within a 180 foot parkway. The roadway is a two lane roadway with bike lanes striped on both sides.

The areas below the I-94 Bridge provides an opportunity for public art (P.3.30). A Gateway Node (P.1.10) that will serve as a welcome to Indian Mounds Regional Park is programed for the south side of Johnson Parkway and East Burns Street. There is an existing Kiosk located within this area, coordination as to the repositioning of this kiosk will need to occur. The completed Gateway Node will include a plaza with kiosk that will have interpretive and map panels, seating, bike repair station, potential drinking fountain, waste receptacles, and public art and a corridor marker. The corridor marker will be placed on the northwest corner of Johnson Parkway and East Burns Street. This node can be constructed independently of any other work.

I94 bridge

side bike walk lane

8’

6’

traffic lane

bike lane

12’

6’

Johnson Parkway Figure 26.1 I-94 Bridge - Trail Improvements

Figure 26.1 Johnson Parkway – I94 Bridge: Trail Improvements

114

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

cycle side track walk

10’

8’

side walk

traffic lane

8’

13’

traffic buffer bike buffer side lane trail walk

Johnson Parkway F

26.2 I-94 B

Figure 26.2 Johnson Parkway – I94 Bridge: Roadway Improvements igure ridge

13’

6’

10’

6’

- Roadway Improvements

8’

200

100

200 Feet

Map 26_Johnson Parkway Euclid to Burns_v25 April 18, 2016

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

| 5

870

N Griffith St

82 0 780

80 0 GlTr

RoPs

E Burns St

?! ! ? ?! ?! ! ? ? ! !?

> > >

AcPl PiGl BePa

? !

PiSt

? !

Johnson Pkwy W Service Rd

890

870

NORTH

Feet

MAP KEY

LEGEND 0 88 890

New Bike Trail Exist. Bike/Shared Use Trail

1.X

Exist. Sidewalk

! ?

Proposed Roadway

Euclid Street to Burns Street

Road Closure

1.X Gateway Node 3.X Corridor Marker

1.X

Wayﬁnding 1.X Major Decision Point 2.X Minor Decision Point 3.X Reinforcement

Cross Section Figure Number

0 88

Map 26 - Johnson Parkway

Ash Tree

Placemaking

d Blv ds

Crosswalk

880

Raised Crossing

200

un Mo

900

0 50 100

2.x Interpretive Node

New Sidewalk

85 0

760

!! ? ? > ?! ! ? > ! ? > ?! ! ? ? ?! >! ?? > ! ? > ! ?! ! ? ! >? ? ! ?! ! > > >

? > !

? !! ? ? ! >> ?! ! ? ?! ! ?> >

QuEl

QuEl QuMa QuMa QuMa QuMa QuEl QuBiJf QuMa QuBiJf

0 79

880

> > >! ?

>> >! ? ? > !

? !! ? ?! ! ?? ! ?! ? >!

>> >! >?

QuEl

> >> > >

? !

? >! >> > >>

PiGl PiGl QuRu PiGl QuRu QuRu

! ? ? ! ! ? ?! ! ? ? ! ?! ! ? ? ! ?! ! ?

Parkway Johnson

0 81

770

NP !! ? ?? ! ? ! ?! ! ? ? ! ? ?! ! > ?! ! ? ? ! ?! ! ?

>> ? ! > ! ?

> > >>

QuRu QuRu QuRu

1.10

870

860

850

las R oint D

oug >> > >

? !

850

n Joh

P s on

0 84 y

MaSpp

MaSpp QuBiJf QuBiJf MaSpp QuMa

E Pacific St

? !

> >

> >>

? !

? ! >

860

? !

> > > > > > >

? !

3.30

son ohn

0 83

85 0

870

880

> >> >>

>> >

? !

? > > !

? !

TiCoGr CaSp CrSp CrSp AeGl UlPu AeGl AeGl

y E Service w k P

880

0 85

UlJa

UlCa UlCa UlCa QuMa QuBi AmCa AmCa AmCa QuRu AmCa AmCa AmCa AmCa QuEl AmCa

3.42

0 86

0 84

860

E Euclid St

E Mclean St

87 0

870

870 >> > >

>> > > > > >

> > >

>> > > ? ! > > > >> > > > > >

nP ar

870

MaSpp MaSpp MaSpp MaSpp

26.5, 26.6

840

PHASE 2

26.1, 26.2 870

26.3, 26.4

Huds on R d

860

870

UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu UlPu AcArm AcPlCk AcPl GiBi TiSpp AcPlCk AcSG UlPu AcSG AcSG GiBi AcSG AcPl UlPu GiBi UlPu UlPu TiSpp TiSpp UlPu TiSpp TiSpp UlPu QuRu 0 UlAmPr 86 QuRu UlSp AmCaAB UlSp UlSp TiCo UlSp UlAmPr CeOc CeOc AmCaAB AmCaAB AcPl AcPl

0 84

0 89

N English St

880

840

E Wilson Ave

860

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

115

5 | G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Map 26 - Johnson Parkway Euclid Street to Burns Street

boulevard

frontage road

boulevard

bike lane

traffic lane

14’

18’

varies

6’

13’

Johnson Parkway

bike multi-use lane trail

6’

12’

boulevard

varies

180’ right-of-way

Figure 26.3 Hudson Road to East McLean Street - Trail Improvements

Figure 26.3 Johnson Parkway – Hudson Rd to E Mclean St: Trail Improvements

side blvd walk

5’

9’

front road

boulevard

lane

18’

varies

13’

Johnson Parkway

116

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

180’ right-of-way

blvd bike blvd side trail walk

6’

Figure 26.3 Hudson Road to East McLean Street - Roadway Improvements

Figure 26.4 Johnson Parkway – Hudson Rd to E Mclean St: Roadway Improvements

10’

5’

boulevard

varies

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

| 5

Map 26 - Johnson Parkway Euclid Street to Burns Street

boulevard

frontage road

boulevard

bike lane

17’-20’

20’

varies

6’

Johnson Parkway

traffic lane

bike lane

boulevard

multi-use trail

boulevard

frontage road

blvd

13’

6’

varies

12’

varies

18’

11’-14’

180’ right-of-way

Figure 26.5 East McLean Street to East Burns Avenue - Trail Improvements

Figure 26.5 Johnson Parkway – E Mclean St to E Burns St: Trail Improvements

side walk

blvd

5’ varies

frontage road

boulevard

20’

varies

traffic lane

grass boulevard

bike trail

boulevard

frontage blvd side road walk

13’

varies

12’

varies

18’ varies 5’

180’ right-of-way

Johnson Parkway

26.6 E

M L

Street to East Burns Avenue- Roadway Improvements

igure ean Figure 26.6 Johnson Parkway – E Mclean St to E Burns ast St: Roadway c Improvements

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

117

5 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Placemaking & Wayfinding Matrix

118

P.3.1

N Pelham Blvd & W 2 or 4 corners of St Anthony Ave bridge

Art / Corridor Marker Corridor Marker

P.3.2

N Pelham Blvd & Myrtle Ave

SE Corner

W.3.2

N Pelham & Myrtle Ave

SE corner

W.3.3

Myrtle Ave & Raymond Ave

SW Corner

P.3.3

Myrtle Ave & Raymond Ave

SE Corner

W.3.4

Raymond Ave & W University Ave

SE & NE Corner

W.3.5

Raymond Ave & Ellis SE & NW Corner Ave

Reinforcement

W.3.6

Raymond Ave & Hampden Ave

NE corner

P.2.2

Raymond Ave & Bayless St

West side between Bayless and Robbins

Interpretive Node

Corridor Marker

P.3.4

Raymond Ave & Long Ave

SE Corner

W.3.7

Raymond Ave & Manvel St

SW Corner

W.2.1

Raymond Ave & Robbins St

NW Corner

W.2.2

Raymond Ave & Energy Park Dr

SE & NW corner

Gateway Node

NE Corner or south side of MRB

Major Decision Point

NE corner

Directional

W.3

Comments

Operational

N Pelham Blvd & w St Anthony Ave

W.3

Reinforcement ("Trail Blazing")

W.2

Directional

P.2.1

W.1

Blade signs (see note)

W.1

Map Panel

P.1

Other

W.3.1

P.1

Bike Repair Station

P.1

Waste / Recycling Receptacle

P.1

Drinking Fountain

W.1.1

south side of MRB

P.3

Corridor Monument

Mississippi River Blvd & N Pelham Blvd Mississippi River Blvd & N Pelham Blvd N Pelham Blvd & Otis Ave

Lighting

Type

Landscaping

P.1.1

Placement

Art

Location

Interpretive Panel (s)

Shown on Map

P.1

Plaza

Key

Wayfinding

P.1, P.2, P.1 & P.2 P.1 P.3

P.1

Stone wall / columns

Line No.

P.1

Seating

Placemaking

Two major cooridors - Pelham and MRB; place corridor monument on NE corner

destinations on MRB / north on GR

North: Grand Round East / South: Grand Round West: Missippi River Boulevard

destination to Marshal Ave via Otis X

NW Corner

Interpretive Node

public art with historic interpretive (ox cart path) X

X At time of bridge replacement opportunity to announce Grand Round to freeway below. Add art to railings, lighting, form liners, etc For Pelham Boulevard

X Reinforcement

route turns X

Reinforcement

route turns X

Corridor Marker

For Raymond Avenue X Univeristy Ave and Grand Round

Reinforcement X

Roadway curve X route turns X South St. Anthony Park, Hampden Park X

X For Raymond Avenue x

Reinforcement

route turns X destinations west on Robbins to Univeristy Transitway

Minor Decision Point

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

destinations on Energy Park Drive to University Transitway

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

â&#x20AC;&#x160;â&#x20AC;&#x2030;| 5

Placemaking & Wayfinding Matrix

W.1.2

Raymond Ave & Como Ave

NE Corner

W.3.10

Como Ave & Gibbs Ave

NW & SE Corner

W.3.11

Como Ave & Fifield St

NW & SE Corner

W.2.5

Como Ave & Inter NE corner Campus Transit Way

Minor Decision Point Reinforcement

W.3.12

Como Ave & Canfield St

NW Corner

W.3.13

Como Ave & N Catlin St

SE Corner

P.3.6

7&8

Como Ave at State Fairgrounds

along Fairground boulevard

Art / Corridor Marker

P.3.7

Como Ave & N Snelling Ave

NW Corner

Minor Decision Point

P.3.8

Como Ave & N Snelling Ave

under bridge

P.3.9

Como Ave & N Snelling Ave

in easterly Median

W.2.6

Como Ave & N Arona St

NW Corner

W.3

Operational

P.1.2

Raymond Ave & Como Ave

NE corner

W.3

Reinforcement ("Trail Blazing")

W.2

Directional

W.2.4

Raymond Ave & Langford Pk

NW corner & E side

W.1

Blade signs (see note)

W.1

Map Panel

W.3.9

Raymond Ave & Atty St

SW Corner

Other

P.1

Bike Repair Station

W.3.8

Raymond Ave & W Standish St

NE Corner

NW corner & E side

P.1

Waste / Recycling Receptacle

P.1

Drinking Fountain

W.2.3

below transitway and Art / Corridor railroad bridge Marker

P.1

Seating

Raymond Ave & transitway and rail underpass Raymond Ave & Blake Ave

Lighting

Type

Corridor Monument

P.3.5

Placement

Landscaping

Location

P.3

Art

Shown on Map

P.1

Interpretive Panel (s)

Key

Stone wall / columns

Line No.

P.1

Wayfinding

P.1, P.2, P.1 P.1 & P.2 P.1 P.3

Plaza

Placemaking

Comments

light based art installation under bridges X

Minor Decision Point

destination to Langford Park & St Anthony Middle School

Reinforcement X Reinforcement X Minor Decision Point

destination to Langford Park & St Anthony Middle School

Integrate public art in major wayfindings, kiosks, ect for destinations on Como, Cleveland, and Raymond

Gateway Node X

Major Decision Point

Reinforcement

North: UofMN East: Grand Round South: Retail / Restruants West: Grand Round

X Reinforcement X destinations on Inter Campus Transitway X

X Reinforcement X

Art / Corridor Marker

Public art interpretive opportunities and plantings along north boulevard area - improve aethetics of corridor

destination to State Fair X light based art under bridge X

Corridor Marker X Minor Decision Point

destinations to Tilden Park and Hmong College Preparatory College

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

119

5 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Placemaking & Wayfinding Matrix

W.2.7

Horton Ave & N Lexington Ave

NW corner

Como Lake 43

P.1.4

trail intersection south Gateway Node of pavilion

W.1.4

W.3.19

W.3.20 & 21

Como Lake

120

W.3

Operational

W.3.18

Horton Ave & N Lexington Ave

west of intersection

W.3

Reinforcement ("Trail Blazing")

W.2

Directional

W.3.17

Horton Ave & W Midway Pkwy

NE corner

W.1

Blade signs (see note)

W.1

Map Panel

W.3.16

Horton Ave & north/south trail

north side

Other

P.1

Bike Repair Station

W.1.3

Como Ave & N Hamline Ave

NE Corner

P.1

Waste / Recycling Receptacle

P.1

Drinking Fountain

P.1.3

Como Ave & N Hamline Ave

NE corner

P.1

Seating

P.3

Corridor Monument

W.3.15

Como Ave & N Hamline Ave

NW Corner

Type

Lighting

Placement

Wayfinding

P.1, P.2, P.1 & P.2 P.1 P.3

Landscaping

W.3.14

Como Ave & N Pascal St

NE Corner

Location

P.1

Art

Shown on Map

P.1

Interpretive Panel (s)

Key

Stone wall / columns

Line No.

P.1

Plaza

Placemaking

Comments

Reinforcement X Operational X Gateway Node X

Major Decision Point

gateway entry to Como Park - public art scupture, themes regarding Como Park history

destinations on existing trolly trail, Hamline as north / south major bikeway

North: Como Park Zoo East: Como Park / Grand Round West: Grand Round

Reinforcement X Reinforcement X Operational X Minor Decision Point

trail intersection south Reinforcement of pavilion West Side

Wayfinding to destinations in each direction, conservatory, zoo, lake, pavilion, pool, rest rooms, water, and Lexington bikeway destinations to south and interpretive panel of Grand Round and Como Park combine with Como Park Wayfinding and Placemaking

map panel of Grand Round and Como Park and destinations

Reinforcement X

SW side Como Lake at trail seperation

Reinforcement

trail seperates for pedestrians and bikes X

P.1.5

W.1.5

W.2.8

west side of Como Blvd /W intersection Maryland AVe/W Wheelock Pkwy / N Victoria St / E Como Blvd Como Blvd /W Maryland AVe/W Wheelock Pkwy / N W Wheelock Pkwy SW Corner & N Grotto St

W.2.9

W Wheelock Pkwy & N St Albans St

SW Corner

Gateway Node

interpretive panels for Grand Round and Como Park , public art (fountain?) X

Major Decision Point Minor Decision Point Minor Decision Point

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

North: North Lake Loop East: Grand Round South: Downtown West: Como Park / Grand Round

Como Lake loop, Como Ave South, Lexington Ave (north) connection and Grand Round destinations to Como Senior High School X

destinations to Northdale Rec Center X

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

| 5

Placemaking & Wayfinding Matrix

W.2.11

P.3.11

W Wheelock Pkwy & W Arlington Ave

S Corner

P.2.4

W.3.23

W.3.24

W Wheelock Pkwy & Horseshoe Bend Ovelook W Wheelock Pkwy & Horshoe Bend Overlook W Wheelock Pkwy & N Rice St

southeast side

P.3.12

W Wheelock Pkwy & N Rice St

SE Corner

P.1.6

W Wheelock Pkwy & Troutbrook Trail

SE corner of Bridge

W Wheelock Pkwy & Troutbrook Trail

SE corner of Bridge

W.3

Operational

south side of W Wheelock between Arndel St and W SE corner

W Wheelock Pkwy & east of N Arundel St W Wheelock Pkwy & N Western Ave

W.3

Reinforcement ("Trail Blazing")

W.2

Directional

P.2.3

W.1

Blade signs (see note)

W.1

Map Panel

Other

Reinforcement

W.3.22

W Wheelock Pkwy & N Mackubin St

SE Corner

P.1

Bike Repair Station

P.1

Waste / Recycling Receptacle

P.3.10

W Wheelock Ave & SE corner N Dale St

Corridor Marker

P.1

Drinking Fountain

Minor Decision Point

P.1

Seating

W Wheelock Ave & SW Corner N Dale St

P.3

Corridor Monument

Type

Lighting

W.2.10

Placement

Wayfinding

P.1, P.2, P.1 & P.2 P.1 P.3

Landscaping

Location

P.1

Art

Shown on Map

P.1

Interpretive Panel (s)

Key

Stone wall / columns

Line No.

P.1

Plaza

Placemaking

Comments

destinatins to Marydale Park X

X Interpretive Node

overlook view of Mississippi River Gorge Edge X

X destinations to Washington Technology Magnet School

Minor Decision Point

Corridor Marker X Interpretive Node X

southeast side

potential mini trailhead and public art, possible interpretive panel on history

Reinforcement X

SE corner

Operational X Corridor Marker X Gateway Node X

W.1.6

W.3.25

W Wheelock Pkwy & N Jackson St

SE Corner

P.3.13

W Wheelock Pkwy & N Jackson St

NW Corner

P.3.14

W Wheelock Pkwy & I35E

SW Corner

W.3.26

W Wheelock Pkwy & I35E

SW Corner

W.3.27

E Wheelock Pkwy & SE Corner I35E

Long term - access to Trout Brook Trail and Trout Brook Natural Area, landscape art down to Trout Brook Trail to Larpenter Avenue (form liners for retaining wall ??) Short Term - Directional sign to Trout Brook via stairway Long Term - access to Trout Brook Trail and Trout Brook Natural Area

Major Decision Point

North: Trout Brook Trail East: Lake Phalen via Grand Round West: Lake Como via Grand Round

Operational X Corridor Marker X Corridor Marker X Operational X Operational X

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

121

5 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Placemaking & Wayfinding Matrix

122

W.3

Wheelock Pkwy & I35E

P.1.7

E Wheelock Pkwy & East of Gateway Bridge Gateway Node Gateway Trail

W.1.7

E Wheelock Pkwy & East of Gateway Bridge Major Decision Gateway Trail Point

W.3.28

E Wheelock Pkwy & in median N Edgerton St

P.3.16

E Wheelock Pkwy & SE Corner & in median Corridor Marker N Edgerton St

W.3.29

E Wheelock Pkwy & in median N Payne Ave

Reinforcement

W.3.30

E Wheelock Pkwy & within green space N Walsh St

Reinforcement

W.3.31

E Wheelock Pkwy & in median west of N Arcade St

Operational

P.3.17

E Wheelock Pkwy & NW Corner N Arcade St

Corridor Marker

P.1.8

E Wheelock Pkwy & NE Corner N Arcade St

Gateway Node

W.1.8

E Wheelock Pkwy & NE Corner N Arcade St

Major Decision Point

P.3.18

E Wheelock Pkwy & SE Corner N Arcade St

Corridor Marker

W.2.12

E Wheelock Pkwy & NE Corner Phalen Dr

Minor Decision Point

W.2.13

Minor Decision Point

W.3.32

W.2.14

P.1.9

E Wheelock Pkwy & at trail intersections west side of Lake Phalen E Wheelock Pkwy & west side of Lake Phalen Johnson Pkwy & at trail intersections south side of Lake Phalen Johnson Pkwy & at trail intersections Bruce Vento Trail

NE Corner

Other

Type

Lighting

P.3.15

Placement

Landscaping

Location

Art

Shown on Map

Stone wall / columns

Key

W.3

Operational

W.2

Reinforcement ("Trail Blazing")

W.1

Directional

W.1

Blade signs (see note)

P.1

Map Panel

P.1

Bike Repair Station

Corridor Monument

P.1

Waste / Recycling Receptacle

Plaza

P.1

Drinking Fountain

P.3

Seating

P.1

Line No.

P.1

Wayfinding

P.1, P.2, P.1 P.1 & P.2 P.1 P.3

Interpretive Panel (s)

Placemaking

Comments

Corridor Marker X

Gateway connection - art (lighting) under bridge, mini seating area, landscaping

North: Gateway Trail East: Lake Phalen via Grand Round West: Como Lake via Grand Round

Operational X area within median for art X

Gateway to Phalen Park and Arcade major bikeway north, connections to Keller Lake and Keller Regional Park Arcade major bikeway north, connections to Keller Lake and Keller Regional Park

North: East: Lake Phalen Park South: Johnson Senior High School / Restaurants / Retail

X destinations to Phalen Lakeside Activity Center

destinations around Lake Phalen

Operational X destinations around Lake Phalen

Minor Decision Point

Gateway Node

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Lake Phalen History, gateway to greater east side X

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

â&#x20AC;&#x160;â&#x20AC;&#x2030;| 5

Placemaking & Wayfinding Matrix

W.3.33

Johnson Pkwy & E Case Ave

NE Corner

W.3.34

Johnson Pkwy & E Stillwater Ave

SE Corner

W.3.35

Johnson Pkwy & E 7th St

NE Corner

P.3.22

Johnson Pkwy & E 7th St

NE Corner

P.3.23

Johnson Pkwy & E 7th St

SE Corner

W.3.36

Johnson Pkwy & E Bush Ave

SE Corner

W.3.37

Johnson Pkwy & E Minnehaha Ave

NE Corner

P.3.24

Johnson Pkwy & E Minnehaha Ave

NW Corner

P.3.25

Johnson Pkwy & E Minnehaha Ave

SE Corner

W.2.16

Johnson Pkwy & E Margaret St

SE Corner

100

P.3.26

Johnson Pkwy & E 6th St

NE Corner

101

North: Bruce Vento Trail East: Retail / Restaurants South: Retail / Restaurants West: Grand Round

W.3

Operational

Corridor Marker

P.3.21

Corridor Marker

W.3

Reinforcement ("Trail Blazing")

under bridge

W.2

Directional

east side of Johnson Pkwy

W.1

Blade signs (see note)

W.1

Map Panel

P.2.5

Johnson Pkwy & Hmong Village entrance Johnson Pkwy & Railroad Bridge

Interpretive Node

Major Decision Point

Other

P.1

Bike Repair Station

W.2.15

Johnson Pkwy & Phalen Blvd

N Corner

P.1

Waste / Recycling Receptacle

P.1

Drinking Fountain

P.3.20

Johnson Pkwy & Phalen Blvd

All Corners

P.1

Seating

Corridor Monument

P.3.19

Johnson Pkwy & E Maryland Ave

All Corners

Type

Lighting

Placement

Landscaping

W.1.9

Johnson Pkwy & Bruce Vento Trail

at trail intersections

Location

P.3

Art

Shown on Map

P.1

Plaza

Key

Stone wall / columns

Line No.

P.1

Wayfinding

P.1, P.2, P.1 P.1 & P.2 P.1 P.3

Interpretive Panel (s)

Placemaking

Comments

Bruce Vento Trail, Grand Round, Lake Phalen Loop

X Corridor Marker X destinations to Ames Lake Park

Minor Decision Point

landscaping - celebrate greater east side X lighted art below bridge X

Reinforcement X Reinforcement X Reinforcement X Corridor Marker X Corridor Marker X Reinforcement X Reinforcement X Corridor Marker X Corridor Marker X Destinations along Margaret

Minor Decision Point

Corridor Marker X

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

123

5 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

Placemaking & Wayfinding Matrix

124

109

P.3.30

Johnson Pkwy & I94 under bridge Bridge

Art / Corridor Marker Reinforcement

W.3.42

Johnson Pkwy & Hudson Rd

NE Corner

110

P.1.10

Johnson Pkwy & Burns St

south side of E Burns St

Gateway Node

111

112

W.1.10

Johnson Pkwy & Burns St

south side of E Burns St

Major Decision Point

Burns Ave & TH61

SW Corner

113

W.1.11

Major Decision Point

W.2.17

Wayfinding Plan

Shepard Rd / Warner Rd East of LaFayette Bridge

South side

114

115

W.1.12

Wayfinding Plan

Shepard Rd / Warner Rd & Jackson St

south side of Shepard Major Decision Rd Point

116

W.2.18

117

P.1.11 W.2.19

119

W.2.20

Shepard Rd & Eagle St Shepard Rd & Randolph Ave Shepard Rd & Randolph Ave Shepard Rd & Otto Ave

south side of Shepard Minor Decision Rd Point SW Corner Gateway Node

118

Wayfinding Plan Placemaking Plan Wayfinding Plan Wayfinding Plan

W.3

Comments

Operational

W.3.41

Johnson Pkwy & E Wilson Ave

NE Corner

108

W.3

Reinforcement ("Trail Blazing")

W.2

Directional

P.3.29

Johnson Pkwy & E Wilson Ave

NE Corner

107

W.1

Blade signs (see note)

W.1

Map Panel

W.3.40

Johnson Pkwy & E 3rd St

SE Corner

106

Other

P.1

Bike Repair Station

P.3.28

Johnson Pkwy & E 3rd St.

SE Corner

105

P.1

Waste / Recycling Receptacle

P.1

Drinking Fountain

P.3.27

Johnson Pkwy & E 3rd St.

NW Corner

104

P.1

Seating

P.3

Corridor Monument

W.3.39

Johnson Pkwy & E 4th St

NE Corner

103

Type

Lighting

Placement

Wayfinding

P.1, P.2, P.1 & P.2 P.1 P.3

Landscaping

W.3.38

Johnson Pkwy & E 6th St

SE Corner

102

Location

P.1

Art

Shown on Map

P.1

Interpretive Panel (s)

Key

Stone wall / columns

Line No.

P.1

Plaza

Placemaking

Reinforcement X Reinforcement X Corridor Marker X Corridor Marker X Reinforcement X Corridor Marker X Reinforcement X light under bridge, art in railings, etc. X

SW Corner SE Corner

North: Grand Round / Lake Phalen East: Grand Round / Mississippi River Trail West: Indian Mound Park / To Downtown

South: Grand Round / Mississippi River Trail West: Indian Mound Park / To Downtown

Minor Decision Point

Minor Decision Point Minor Decision Point

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

Gateway to east side, Indian Mound Park, River vistas, Great River Passage, Grand Round, and Mississippi River Trail Gateway to east side, Indian Mound Park, River vistas, Great River Passage, Grand Round, and Mississippi River Trail

Could be combined with Indian Mounds Park Wayfinding Future Trout Brook Trail connection X

North: Capital City Bikeway East: Grand Round West: Grand Round / Mississippi River Trail

Existing

Gateway node is existing

destinations to Capital City Bikeway Existing

Existing Kiosk

X X

destination to Ford River Trail

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

â&#x20AC;&#x160;â&#x20AC;&#x2030;| 5

Placemaking & Wayfinding Matrix

122

W.2.21

123

W.2.22

124

W.1.14

125

W.1.15

126

P.1.13

127

W.2.24

128

W.2. 25

129

W.2. 26

130

W.2. 27

131

W.2. 28

132

W.2. 29

Wayfinding Plan

133

W.2. 30

Wayfinding Plan

W.3

Gateway Node

SW Corner

Gateway Node

SE Corner

Minor Decision Point Minor Decision Point Major Decision Point Major Decision Point

W.3

Comments

Operational

Blade signs (see note)

W.2

Reinforcement ("Trail Blazing")

W.1

Directional

W.1

Map Panel

Other

P.1

Bike Repair Station

P.1

Waste / Recycling Receptacle

W.1.13

SW Corner

Type

P.1

Drinking Fountain

Corridor Monument

121

Shepard Rd & Placemaking Crosby Farm Plan Entrance Shepard Rd & Wayfinding Crosby Farm Plan Entrance Wayfinding Shepard Rd & Afton Plan St Wayfinding Shepard Rd & Plan Davern St Wayfinding Shepard Rd & Plan Gannon Rd Mississippi River Wayfinding Blvd & south of Ford Plan Pkwy Mississippi River Placemaking Blvd & south of Ford Plan Pkwy Wayfinding Mississippi River Plan Blvd & Ford Pkwy Wayfinding Mississippi River Plan Blvd & Ford Pkwy Mississippi River Wayfinding Blvd & Highland Plan Pkwy Mississippi River Wayfinding Blvd & Jefferson Plan Pkwy Mississippi River Wayfinding Blvd & Summit Ave Plan

Placement

P.1

Seating

Interpretive Panel (s)

P.1.12

Location

Lighting

Plaza

Line No. 120

Shown on Map

Landscaping

P.3

Art

P.1

Key

Wayfinding

P.1, P.2, P.1 P.1 & P.2 P.1 P.3

Stone wall / columns

Placemaking

Existing X Existing X

SE Corner South side West side

West side

X X

destinations to 7th St destinations to Ford River Trail Existing

Existing X

Gateway Node X Minor Decision Point Minor Decision Point Minor Decision Point

X X X

Minor Decision Point

Mississippi River Blvd & Summit Ave

Minor Decision Point

Mississippi River Blvd & Marshall Ave

Minor Decision Point

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

125

6 | I m p l e m e n tat i o n N ot e s

6 | I mplementation Estimates of Program Costs The idea of the Grand Round, a park encircling the City of Saint Paul and connecting its’ assets begun more than 100 years ago. Fifteen years ago, the Grand Round Master Plan was created to resurrect the idea, as the southern portion along the Mississippi River of paths and sidewalks and gathering places were completed in the interim. Through Saint Paul’s 8 80 Vitality Initiative the effort was renewed to complete the northern 13 miles of the Grand Round.

The table includes opinions of estimated costs for the program elements within the following categories:

The prioritization and scoping of the implementation phasing is a collaboration of input from the public, the Mayor’s Office, Planning and Economic Development, Parks and Recreation, and Public Works. The resulting programming will the integration of 8 80 ideas into ongoing capital improvement activities of each department embedding vitality into City programs. Actual sequencing and magnitude of improvements will be based on future City budgeting processes.

improvements. As well as applicable grading, clearing, grubbing, reforestation, and boulevard restoration.

• Streets – Includes curb and gutter, pavement, intersection and roadway construction, storm sewer and catch basins, all necessary clearing and grubbing, and replanting and boulevard restoration. • Trails – Includes 10 to 12 foot wide bituminous bike and multi-use trails, operational signage, wayfinding, and crossing

• Parkway Amenities – Includes kiosks, benches, waste receptacles, landscaping, parklets, accent lighting, public art, corridor markers, interpretive elements that are unique to each node location.

COMO

Edgerton St

ENGLIS H

o nt

SEGMENT 4 Wheelock Parkway (4A. Como Ave to Rice and 4B. Edgerton St to Arcade St.)

I 35 E

Hamline-Midway

Euclid St

Smith Ave Av e

Western Ave

SEGMENT 9

Ra n

lp h

Jefferson Ave

Battle Creek-Highwood

IL L

TE TA

OG G

Summit Hill

KELL

B WA

SUMMIT

SEGMENT 9 Grand Round South Loop (Burns Ave to Pelham Blvd.) R WA

IT MM

Summit Ave

ert

Summit-University

t nS so St ck

s ba Wa

Marshall Ave

West Side

RANDOLPH

West Seventh

Highland Pkwy

Otto Ave

ANNAP OLIS

Ford Pkwy H 7T

i ra lT

i Ra

H OM

5 I3

rd Fo

Davern St

5B TH 5

rid ge

on Aft

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

SEGMENT 6 Como Ave(Hamiline to Raymond Ave)

SEGMENT 8 Pelham Blvd. (University Ave to Mississippi River Blvd.

Dayton's Bluff

Indian Mound Trail

H IG

Downtown

SEGMENT 5 Como Park (Como Ave to Hamline Ave)

SEGMENT 7 Raymond Ave (Como Ave to Univ. Ave)

IT Y

H 7T

MINNEH AHA

Margaret St

UNIVERS ITY

AY D

Reaney Ave

SEGMENT 1

Thomas-Dale(Frogtown)

SEGMENT 8

Macalester-Groveland

PH AL

MCK N

CO M

OPINION OF COST The idea of the Grand Round a path encircling St Paul was begun more than 100 years ago. Fifteen years ago, the Grand Round Master Plan was created to resurrect the idea, and the southern portion along the Mississippi river was completed some time ago. Through Saint Paul’s 8 80 Vitality Initiative the effort was renewed to complete the northern 13 miles of the Grand Round. The prioritization of the implementation phasing is a collaboration of the public, the Mayor’s Office, Planning and Economic Development, Parks and Recreation, and Public Works. The results will be the integration of 8 80 ideas into ongoing activities of each department, embedding vitality into city programs and capital improvements. Actual sequencing of improvements will be based on going City budgeting process. The following table is a summary of estimated order of magnitude opinion of construction costs using 2015 construction indexes. The table has been developed for Segments using potential project limits as defined by the City of Saint Paul’s 5-year capital improvement plan. Future project scope, phasing, and costs will change based on future scope, construction cost indexes, and budget limitations at the time of actual implementation. More detailed breakdown of costs may be found in the appendix of this document.

SA I N T PAUL G RA N D ROUN D IMP L EMENTATIO N P L AN

126

SEGMENT 3 Wheelock Parkway (Rice Street to Edgerton Street)

East 7th Street

Lexington Ave

ive rs

Highland

SEGMENT 2 Phalen Park (Phalen Blvd. to Arcade)

e ve eV uc yA rit pe s o Pr

SEGMENT 2

Hamline Ave

ai Tr

PIERCE B UTLER

ity Av e

SEGMENT 1 Johnson Parkway (Phalen Boulevard to Burns Ave)

Greater East Side

Arccade St

ook Tr Trout Br

Lake Phalen

Payne-Phalen

North End

SEGMENT 7

SEGMENT 4B

SEGMENT 4A

UofM Transi t w

SEGMENT 3

LEGEND

LA RPENTEUR

IGHT

Dr ive

SEGMENT 5

I35E

PAYNE

UofM Saint Paul Campus

Pa rk

Lake Como

CLE VELAND

rgy

o R aym n d Av e

En e

Dale St

SEGMENT 6

St. Anthony Park

Pelham Ave

W.3.6

Snelling Ave

State Fair Grounds

Rice St

Como

HOY T

Greenbrier St

i ra yT wa te

Merriam Park/Lexington-Hamline

The following table is a summary of estimated order of magnitude opinion of project costs using 2016 construction indexes. The table has been developed for Segments using potential project limits as defined by the City of Saint Paul’s 5-year capital improvement plan along with natural divides along the route. Future project scope, phasing, and costs will change based on future scope, construction cost indexes, and budget limitation at the time of actual implementation.

• Lighting – Includes removal of existing lighting, installation of new electrical feed points, conduit and conductors, bases, and luminaries.

b Ro

Potential funding sources include and are not limited to: local funds, street improvement bonds, capital improvement bonds, County funds, Municipal State Aid funds, State funds, Department of Natural Resource funds, and Federal funds.

• Sidewalks – Include construction of 5 foot concrete sidewalk on both sides of the parkway, as well as applicable grading, clearing, grubbing, reforestation, and boulevard restoration.

//DRAFT// 01/12/16

I m p l e m e n tat i o n N ot e s â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 6 GRAND ROUND PROGRAM SUMMARY & IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Budget Estimates

YEAR SEGMENT 1

LOCATION Johnson Pkwy

2016

Wheelock Pkwy

2019

Beyond 2020

2020

Roadway, Trail, & Sidewalks

Trail

1,963,000

Street

6,358,000

Sidewalk

1,737,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

959,000

1,284,000

COST PER SEGMENT

12,301,000 $

12,301,000

Roadway, Trail, & Sidewalks

(Phalen Blvd to Arcade St) Trail

1,675,000

Street

3,621,000

Sidewalk

925,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

730,000

693,000

7,644,000 $

7,644,000

8,825,500

Estimated Project Cost

2018

(Burns Ave to Phalen Blvd)

Estimated Project Cost

2017

(Rice St to Edgerton St)

Roadway, Trail, Sidewalks

Trail

1,503,000

Street

4,367,000

Sidewalk

1,360,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

812,500

783,000

8,825,500

Estimated Project Cost

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

127

6 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;I m p l e m e n tat i o n N ot e s GRAND ROUND PROGRAM SUMMARY & IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Budget Estimates

YEAR SEGMENT 4.A

LOCATION Wheelock Pkwy

(Victoria St to Western Ave)

Wheelock Pkwy

1,178,000

Street

4,656,000

Sidewalk

682,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

729,000

231,000

7,476,000

(Western Ave to Rice St)

Wheelock Pkwy

638,000

Street

3,660,000

Sidewalk

949,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

506,000

244,000

5,997,000

(Edgerton St to Arcade St)

2019

Beyond 2020

COST PER SEGMENT

7,476,000

5,997,000

3,804,000

Roadway, Trail, & Sidewalks

Trail

431,000

Street

3,007,000

Sidewalk

64,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

288,000

14,000

3,804,000

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

2020

Roadway, Trail, & Sidewalks

Trail

Estimated Project Cost

128

2018

Roadway, Trail, & Sidewalks $

Estimated Project Cost

4.C

2017

Trail

Estimated Project Cost

4.B

2016

I m p l e m e n tat i o n N ot e s â&#x20AC;&#x2030; | 6 GRAND ROUND PROGRAM SUMMARY & IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Budget Estimates

YEAR SEGMENT 5

LOCATION Como Ave

2016

Como Ave

Pelham Blvd

COST PER SEGMENT

964,000

Street

3,674,000

Sidewalk

532,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

608,000

855,000

6,633,000 $

(Hamline Ave to Raymond Ave)

Bike Lane Striping $

Roadway, Trail, & Sidewalks 843,000

Street

7,122,000

Sidewalk

334,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

608,000

699,000

9,606,000 $

9,609,000

6,322,000

5,861,000 $

5,991,000

3,000 Roadway & Sidewalks

(Como Ave to University Ave) - (City) $

(University Ave to MRB) Trail

3,000

6,633,000

EstimatedProject Cost

Beyond 2020

2020 $

Estimated Project Cost

Raymond Ave

2019

Trail

2018

Roadway, Trail, & Sidewalks

(Como Blvd to Hamline Ave)

Estimated Project Cost

2017

6,322,000 Cycle Track

Roadway, Trail, & Sidewalks

130,000

$783,000

Street

$3,021,000

Sidewalk

$179,000

Lighting Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

Estimated Project Cost

$41,000 $1,837,000 $

130,000

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

129

6 | â&#x20AC;&#x2030;I m p l e m e n tat i o n N ot e s GRAND ROUND PROGRAM SUMMARY & IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Budget Estimates

YEAR SEGMENT 9

LOCATION South Segment

2016

2017

2018

2019

Beyond 2020

2020

COST PER SEGMENT

Branding & Wayfinding

(Burns Ave to Pelham Blvd) Parkway Amenities (I.e. Kiosks, benches, Waste Receptacles, art, etc.)

Estimated Project Cost

TOTAL PROJECT COST PER YEAR

15,280,500 $

7,476,000 $

5,997,000 $

3,804,000

541,000 $

541,000

42,586,000 $

75,143,500

Note: Budget Estimates are opinions of potential costs in 2016 dollars. Budgets include estimates for surface upgrades within the Grand Round corridor such as curb & gutter, pavement, intersection storm sewer and catch basins, lighting, sidewalks, trails, limited grade changes, clearing and grubbing related to each activity, and preliminary estimates of a limited level of tree replacement, landscaping, wayfinding, amenities and art, plus 35% for contingency. Cost estimates do not include estimates for subsurface soil or foundation corrections, utility upgrades such as sanitary and storm sewer trunk line rehab, service line replacements, private utility upgrades, changes in construction materials and markets, nor public structures such as bus and park shelters.

130

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2016

G r a n d R o u n d P l a n R e co m m e n dat i o n s

G r a n d R o u n d D e s i g n & I m p l e m e n tat i o n P l a n | A p r i l 2 0 1 6

â&#x20AC;&#x160;â&#x20AC;&#x2030;| 5

131