Reviews Prehistory, Personality, and Place: Emil W. Haury and the Mogollon Controversy By Jefferson Reid and Stephanie Whittlesey (University of Arizona Press, 2010; 208 pgs., illus.; $20 paper; www.uapress.arizona.edu) In the fall of 1930 and the summer of 1931, two young archaeologists set out to survey the archaeological sites of the southwestern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona mountains. Traveling in an old woody station wagon, Emil Haury and Russell Hastings traveled the back roads of the rugged country, camping along the way as they documented the prehistoric ruins of the region. In the following years, Haury excavated at two major sites. In 1936, Haury published The Mogollon Culture of Southwestern New Mexico, in which he defined the ancient Mogollons as a culture distinct from their Anasazi and Hohokam neighbors, triggering a major intellectual debate that involved most all of the big names of the era, including Alfred V. Kidder, J.O. Brew, and Paul Martin. Tree ring dating was just beginning, so Haury had to use ceramics and stratigraphy to put the Mogollon into temporal context. He found that the Mogollon architecture, ceramics, mortuary practices, and other aspects of material culture were markedly different from the Hohokam and the Anasazi. University of Arizona archaeologists Jefferson Reid and Stephanie Whittlesey ably chronicle this controversy and the personalities who drove it. It is also a book about the places that shaped the New Archaeology of the Southwest.
52
Excavating Nauvoo: The Mormons and the Rise of Historical Archaeology By Benjamin C. Pykles (University of Nebraska Press, 2010; 416 pgs., illus.; $62 cloth; www.nebraskapress.unl.edu)
Before Salt Lake City there was Nauvoo, Illinois, home to the fledgling Mormon Church from 1839 to 1846. Founder Joseph Smith selected the site on the east bank of the Mississippi River after being driven from Missouri, and at its peak Nauvoo had some 12,000 inhabitants, the same number as Chicago. But the unconventional practices of the new church drew strong opposition in Illinois as well, and Smith was murdered in 1844 in a jail in nearby Carthage. Led by Brigham Young, most of the Mormons left Illinois for Utah and in a few years the once thriving city was virtually deserted. Excavating Nauvoo tells the fascinating story of the excavation and restoration of the 19th-century city. The Nauvoo archaeological project was headed by J.C. Harrington, considered to be the father of historical archaeology, who made his reputation at Colonial Jamestown. The project lasted from 1961 to 1984 and parallels the development of the now well-established discipline of historical archaeology. Funded by the Utah church, the project quickly became a source of dispute between the two main branches of Mormonism—the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Utah LDS) and the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (RLDS), which consists primarily of descendants of Mormons who did not follow Brigham Young to Utah. The project is important for nonMormons as well, since Nauvoo is representative of frontier towns of the era, and it was largely undisturbed by continuous development and change. Author Benjamin Pykles, an archaeologist at SUNY-Potsdam, has produced a detailed and readable study of all aspects of the Nauvoo project and its role in the development of historical archaeology. The competing approaches and philosophies of the Utah LDS and the RLDS add interest and controversy to the story.Today, visitors to Nauvoo get to enjoy an authentically restored frontier town, made so with the wise use of historical archaeology. Along with the history of the Mormon Church, they also receive an ample dose of LDS proselytizing and a competing view from the RLDS.
summer • 2010
