Letters Beware The Badgers Your thoughtful feature article “The Bears Ears Controversy” (Fall 2016) brought light to this controversy in southern Utah. But you missed a unique threat to cultural resources there. According to Utah Representative Mike Noel, an outspoken critic of proper cultural resource management, “There is no fresh digging. All we can see today are badger holes. We have to get a handle on these badgers because those little suckers are going down and digging up artifacts and sticking them in their holes.” As if the job of a preservation archaeologist isn’t hard enough. Mark Luttrell Seward, Alaska Statement of Ownership, Management, and Circulation 1. Publication Title: American
Archaeology. 2. Publication No.: 1093-8400. 3. Filing Date: September 29, 2016. 4. Issue Frequency: Quarterly. 5. No. of Issues Published Annually: 4. 6. Annual Subscription Price: $25.00. 7. Complete Mailing Address of Known Office of Publication: The Archaeological Conservancy, 1717 Girard Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106. 8. Complete Mailing Address of Headquarters or General Business Office of Publisher: same as No. 7. 9. Full Names and Complete Mailing Addresses of Publisher, Editor, and Managing Editor: Publisher—Mark Michel, address same as No. 7. Editor—Michael Bawaya, address same as No. 7. Managing Editor—N/A. 10. Owner: The Archaeological Conservancy, address same as No. 7. 11. Known Bondholders, Mortgagees, and Other Security Holders Owning or Holding 1 Percent or More of Total Amount of Bonds, Mortgages, or Other Securities: None. 12. Tax Status: Has Not Changed During Preceding 12 Months. 13. Publication Title: American Archaeology. 14. Issue Date for Circulation Data Below: Spring 2016. 15. Extent and Nature of Circulation: Average Number of Copies Each Issue During Preceding 12 Months: (A) Total No. Copies (net press run): 30,125. (B) Paid Circulation (By mail and outside the mail): (1) Mailed Outside County Paid Subscriptions Stated on PS Form 3541 (Include paid distribution above nominal rate, advertiser’s proof copies, and exchange copies.): 18,689; (2) Mailed In-County Paid Subscriptions stated on PS Form 3541 (Include paid distribution above nominal rate, advertiser’s proof copies, and exchange copies.): 0; (3) Paid Distribution Outside the Mails Including Sales Through Dealers and Carriers, Street Vendors, Counter Sales, and Other Paid Distribution Outside USPS: 2,658; (4) Paid Distribution by Other Classes of Mail Through the USPS (e.g. First-Class Mail): 760. (C) Total Paid Distribution (Sum of 15b (1), (2), (3), and (4)): 22,107. (D) Free or Nominal Rate Distribution (By Mail and Outside the Mail): (1) Free or Nominal Rate Outside-County Copies Included on PS Form 3541: 0; (2) Free or Nominal Rate In-County Copies Included on PS Form 3541: 0; (3) Free or Nominal Rate Copies Mailed at Other Classes Through the USPS (e.g. First-Class Mail): 45; (4) Free or Nominal Rate Distribution Outside the Mail (Carriers or other means): 2,221. (E) Total Free or Nominal Rate Distribution (Sum of 15D (1), (2), (3) and (4)): 2,266. (F) Total Distribution (Sum of 15C and E): 24,373. (G) Copies not Distributed: 5,752. (H) Total (Sum of 15F and G): 30,125. (I) Percent Paid (15C divided by 15F times 100): 90.70%. 15. Extent and Nature of Circulation: Number Copies of Single Issue Published Nearest to Filing Date: (A) Total No. Copies (net press run): 31,500. (B) Paid Circulation (By mail and outside the mail): (1) Mailed Outside County Paid Subscriptions Stated on PS Form 3541 (Include paid distribution above nominal rate, advertiser’s proof copies, and exchange copies.): 19,077; (2) Mailed In-County Paid Subscriptions stated on PS Form 3541 (Include paid distribution above nominal rate, advertiser’s proof copies, and exchange copies.): 0; (3) Paid Distribution Outside the Mails Including Sales Through Dealers and Carriers, Street Vendors, Counter Sales, and Other Paid Distribution Outside USPS: 2,412; (4) Paid Distribution by Other Classes of Mail Through the USPS (e.g. First-Class Mail): 476. (C) Total Paid Distribution (Sum of 15b (1), (2), (3), and (4)): 21,965. (D) Free or Nominal Rate Distribution (By Mail and Outside the Mail): (1) Free or Nominal Rate Outside-County Copies Included on PS Form 3541: 0; (2) Free or Nominal Rate In-County Copies Included on PS Form 3541: 0; (3) Free or Nominal Rate Copies Mailed at Other Classes Through the USPS (e.g. FirstClass Mail): 40; (4) Free or Nominal Rate Distribution Outside the Mail (Carriers or other means): 3,805. (E) Total Free or Nominal Rate Distribution (Sum of 15D (1), (2), (3) and (4)): 3,845. (F) Total Distribution (Sum of 15C and E): 25,810. (G) Copies not Distributed: 5,690. (H) Total (Sum of 15F and G): 31,500. (I) Percent Paid (15C divided by 15F times 100): 85.10%. 16. Electronic Copy Circulation: N/A. 17. Publication of Statement of Ownership: If the publication is a general publication, publication of this statement is required. Will be printed in the Winter 2016 issue of this publication. 18. I certify that all information furnished on this form is true and complete. Michael Bawaya, Editor.
american archaeology
Editor’s Corner It used to be that if you asked a Paleo-Indian archaeologist how and when the Americas were first colonized, you’d get a simple answer: some 13,000 years ago the Clovis people migrated from Siberia via a land bridge (Beringia) into the northwest corner of the Americas. They continued south through an ice-free corridor, and then spread west, east, and south. This was known as the Clovis First model, and for a number of years it passed as gospel among first American scholars. But eventually new evidence emerged discrediting that gospel. Archaeologists uncovered sites throughout the Americas that were more than 13,000 years old. One site, Monte Verde, yielded evidence that people were living in southern Chile more than 1,000 years before the Clovis passed through the ice-free corridor. There were reports that other sites were 15,000, 20,000, even 50,000 years old. The subject of the Americas’ colonization had long been the exclusive purview of archaeologists, but then some geneticists dared to butt in. Using complicated extrapolations, they derived their own dates as to when people arrived. In some cases the genetic and archaeological data were complementary, in other cases they were anything but. If the first Americans arrived roughly 16,000 years ago, as geneticists seem to think, how could they have occupied a site in South Carolina that an archaeologist claims is 50,000 years old? As our feature “How Were The Americas Colonized” (see page 39) reveals, fashioning all this disparate information into a model, even a remotely plausible model, is beyond the most nimble of minds. The Clovis First model is dead, but now what? So if you happen to run into a Paleo-Indian archaeologist, don’t even bother to ask.
3
