Issue 17

Page 1

THE AMHERST

THE INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER OF AMHERST COLLEGE SINCE 1868

STUDENT VOLUME CXLVII, ISSUE 17 l WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2017

Women’s Squash Win Streak Reaches Four See Sports, Page 9 AMHERSTSTUDENT.AMHERST.EDU

Sociologist Links Environmentalism and Race in Talk Audrey Cheng ’20 and Emma Wilfert ’20 Staff Writers

Photo courtesy of Faith Wen ’20

In a talk titled “Race, Space and Social Justice” on Feb. 9, Dr. Dorceta Taylor spoke on environmentalism’s historical bases in racism. Her talk was part of a two-day event on race and environmental inequalities.

College Holds Open Meeting on ICE Raids Shawna Chen ’20 Managing News Editor Students, faculty and staff gathered for a meeting on Monday, Feb. 13, to discuss the recent upsurge in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids, which have arrested nearly 700 undocumented people in the last week. Held in the Powerhouse and open to members of the college community, the meeting provided information about the ICE raids and facilitated conversation about how to mobilize in response. The Trump administration carried out nationwide ICE raids last week in a “a series of targeted enforcement operations,” according to Department of Homeland Security Secretary

John Kelly in a statement on Monday, Feb. 13. The raids swept through regions of the country including Los Angeles, New York, Texas, the Baltimore and D.C. metro area, Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri and Wisconsin, according to The New York Times. The meeting was publicized by President Biddy Martin in a community-wide email on Saturday, Feb. 11. In the email, Martin said that Chief Student Affairs Officer Suzanne Coffey had contacted students who are undocumented or have DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) status” and that “Amherst will do everything we can using the fullest extent of the law to protect members of our community who could be affected by changes in immigra-

tion policy and enforcement and to be a relentless voice in opposition to the threats faced by members of our community.” At the meeting, Professor of Sociology Leah Schmalzbauer gave a brief history on ICE, a federal law enforcement agency under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Created in 2003, ICE is responsible for enforcing “federal laws governing border control, customs, trade and immigration to promote homeland security and public safety,” according to the ICE website. Schmalzbauer said enforcement by ICE has been increasing recently. ICE carries out two kinds of deportations, “returns” and “removals.” “Returns” occur when an undocumented

Continued on Page 3

Dr. Dorceta Taylor gave a talk at Amherst on Feb. 9 titled “Race, Space and Social Justice.” The talk, which was over an hour long and held in the Greenway A Event Space, was followed by half an hour of questions at the end. The talk was part of Taylor’s two-day event, “Race, Space and Environmental Inequalities,” which also included a student workshop on campus social justice on Feb. 9, a breakfast Q&A session on careers in activism on Feb. 10 and a lunch Q&A session for students of color on Feb. 10. The two Q&A events were available with advance sign-up only. Born and raised in Jamaica, Taylor graduated from the School of Forestry and Environmental Studies at Yale. She is currently a professor of environmental sociology at the University of Michigan. Her research includes food access, analysis of the composition of the environmental workforce, environmental justice, ethnic relations and poverty, race and gender. Taylor said that as a young student, she felt constrained by the specialization required by the Jamaican education system. “I decided to be very defiant and get out of that box and start connecting, and it wasn’t long until I started to read sociology and history … and I was able to start to ask really weird and strange questions,” she said. Taylor began the talk by focusing on the lack of racial diversity in the American environmental movement. She said that for decades, environmental agencies have not broken a 12 to 16 percent racial composition of people of color, despite the increase of racial diversity in the United States. The problem, Taylor said, is due to “un-

Continued on Page 3

Gun Control Expert Speaks on Future of Movement

Claire Dennis ’20 Staff Writer

Carl Bogus, a research professor at the Roger Williams University School of Law, addressed a group of students, fellows and faculty on the topic of gun control on Monday, Feb. 13. The talk was the fourth part in a speaker series hosted by the Law, Jurisprudence and Social Thought department titled “Guns in Law.” Bogus’ lecture centered around his recently published essay, “The Simple Truth about Gun Control.” In his paper and subsequent talk, Bogus provided a straightforward answer to the question of gun control. “There is only one kind of gun control that is effective,” Bogus said. “That’s the hard, simple truth. And it is whatever reduces handguns in general circulation.” Bogus argued that the U.S. subscribes to “model one” of gun control. “Model one,” he said, is a policy in which “everyone can have a gun except those who can’t — convicted felons [and] people who are ‘mentally defective.’” According to Bogus, all other “affluent nations” similar to the U.S. adhere to “model two” of gun control, in which “nobody can have a handgun

except those who can — law enforcement people [and] people who have a special need for a handgun.” “‘Model one’ will never work, because we can’t divide people up into good guys and bad guys,” Bogus said. “The world is too complicated for that, and we can’t tell the difference.” Bogus walked attendees through his analysis of gun control, tackling the contentious issue from political, historical, constitutional and cultural perspectives. He addressed several factors in the debate over gun control, from the growing political power of the National Rifle Association to the importance of the right to bear arms in the 1788 debates over Constitutional ratification. With guns so ingrained in American culture, Bogus argued that a national campaign to stigmatize gun ownership, similar to campaigns against cigarette consumption and drunk driving, could offer one solution to catalyze gun control reform. However, Bogus warned the audience not to focus too much on short-term goals, citing his own work in enacting the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, which established a waiting period after buying a firearm and bolstered background checks. Bogus later realized the ad-

verse effect its passage had on the gun control movement. By offering a false sense of success to gun control advocates, the bill inadvertently reduced motivation to strive for more comprehensive reform. “The idea is that we needed a political win,” Bogus said. “The gun control movement has never recovered from that pyrrhic victory. Because when you frame something [like], ‘Should we do nothing or have a seven-day waiting period [before finalizing a gun purchase]?’ you persuade people that we can’t do any better.” After Bogus’ lecture, the talk turned into a discussion, with students speaking on various aspects and perspectives on gun control. “I was interested in going to the talk because I just started taking LJST classes and I find the topic very interesting,” Adelaide Shunk ’20 said. “I think gun control is a very prevalent issue, and so I thought it was really cool that we had a scholar who was at the forefront of gun control coming to talk.” “I think [I chose to attend the talk] primarily because I’m from Chicago, and it’s sort of a very interesting notion, particularly now with the political climate and everyone talking about that sort of thing, and it’s a discussion that I

have with my parents a lot,” Will Jackson ’18 said. Bogus said that his solution to gun violence, while simple in nature, would be far less simple to implement. “What I’m telling you is, the only form of gun control that is effective is unconstitutional today,” Bogus said. “That’s the hard, simple truth. Does that mean that all of us who want to do something about this throw our hands up and go home? … I say no. But we have to first confront the hard reality and take a long-term view, because what is unconstitutional today is not necessarily unconstitutional tomorrow.” Despite recognizing that promoting gun control would take extensive effort and work, Shunk said that he left feeling motivated to take measures that could ensure effective gun regulation in the future. “I felt really empowered to figure out ways to reshape public opinion, because I think one of the big things that we stressed in our discussion after the talk was the whole idea that the statistics and the talk and the article, we all agreed with ... but there’s a disconnect with the general public,” Shunk said. “The general public doesn’t care about statistics. They care about feelings.”


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.