THE STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF AMHERST COLLEGE SINCE 1868
THE AMHERST
STUDENT
Follow us on Instagram!
VOLUME CXLIX, ISSUE 3 l WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
@amherststudent AMHERSTSTUDENT.COM
College Seeks to Modernize Information Systems in BIG Initiative Ryan Yu ’22 Managing News Editor
Photo courtesy of Matai Curzon ‘22
The AAS and the JC will begin creating a new appeals process not currently found in the AAS constitution. Other forms of appealing JC decisions, such as a senate supermajority vote, are not possible due to AAS restrictions.
ACR Requests Appeals Process From JC Zach Jonas ’22 Managing News Editor The executive board (E-board) of the Amherst College Republicans (ACR) has asked the Judiciary Council (JC) to appeal its decision last spring to sanction ACR after the Association of Amherst Students (AAS) was made aware of ACR GroupMe screenshots containing derogatory language toward LGBTQ students and staff. The request, however, has brought attention to the lack of a formalized process in the AAS constitution for directly appealing a JC decision. Last spring, after The Student published screenshots of the club’s GroupMe chat, which showed ACR members making hateful and transphobic comments about the LGBTQ community on campus, the AAS filed a complaint to the JC. In early April, the JC announced its sanctions “based on reports of discrimi-
natory language or hate speech,” according to the announcement made after the April 4 hearing. The JC ordered ACR’s then E-board and E-board elects to step down from any and all E-board positions and release a statement in The Student “affirming that they condemn hate speech” before the end of the academic year. If the group did not take these actions, it would not be able to receive funding from AAS, the JC ruling said. The AAS constitution does not give JC authority to de-register student organizations. ACR did not carry out any of the mandated actions. Near the end of the spring 2019 semester, Sarah Melanson ’20, now-president of ACR, asked the JC to appeal its earlier decision, claiming that the punishment did not fit the crime. And she wasn’t the only one scrutinizing the JC’s decision. Since the end of last semester, the JC has backpeddaled parts of the de-
cision such as who on the E-Board should step down, while other sanctions, such as the mandatory anti-bias training for all RSOs, have yet to be implemented. In an email exchange obtained by The Student, the JC clarified to a member of the ACR E-board that by originally declaring that “the current E-board and E-board elects of ACR must step down from their positions and will not be permitted to hold an E-board position in any RSO for the remainder of their time at Amherst,” the ruling required only a select few E-board members, not all, to step down from their positions. Two of the ACR E-board members sanctioned in the original decision graduated in the spring of 2019. One did step down from his position before the end of the year. In an opinion piece published in The Student last spring, Chief of Student Affairs Karu Kozuma asked the AAS to more carefully recon-
sider the JC’s ruling. “Neither the Judiciary Council nor the AAS has the authority to enforce the Amherst College Honor Code, which is cited as a foundational basis for the punitive measures that were announced,” he wrote. “The [measure of removing the ACR E-board from their posts on all RSOs] may have ripple effects that are punitive of other students and student organizations that have no relation to the underlying incident [JC] addressed in the measures.” He added that he was concerned “there may also have been some procedural anomalies.” The JC responded to Melanson’s request near the end of last semester stating that it had no power to appeal its own decision as outlined in the AAS constitution. Instead, the JC decision must be appealed by either a three-fourths majority in the AAS
Continued on page 4
This past July, the college started implementing the first phase of its Business Improvement Group (BIG) Initiative, a project designed to modernize business processes at Amherst. The initiative seeks to overhaul the college’s nearly twodecade-old business management software and consolidate workflow — from payroll and human resources activities to student advising and registration — on a new digital cloud-based system, replacing existing tools such as ACData and migrating paper-intensive activities online. The first phase of the BIG Initiative, which has an expected completion date for the end of June 2020 and will be implemented shortly thereafter, is tasked with migrating Amherst’s existing finance and payroll systems from Ellucian Colleague, the college’s current resource planning system, to Workday. The new system will largely eliminate the use of paper forms in payroll or reimbursement-related matters, instead requiring forms to be completed online, according to Chief Finance Officer Kevin Weinman. Formally scheduled to begin after the first phase is complete, the second phase of the BIG initiative will focus on transitioning the student experience to Workday over an 18- to 24-month period. While
Continued on page 4