ANDREW HAN
ANDREW HAN
SCI_Arc
Portfolio
2017-19
CONTENTS
Design Studio
3B 4A 4B 5A 5B
003 019 037 067 071
Applied Studies 4A 4B
087 099
Visual Studies 5A
107
Massing Diagram
Massing Strategy
Iteration_1:
Iteration_2:
A relationship between primitives was established by relating the common geometry and nesting them within one another.
Using the primitive geometry, the volumes were extended to use the entirety of the site as well as to meet the ground.
Iteration_4:
Iteration_5:
The masses are joined together and then broken apart to signify the part to whole relationship in order to make a more coherent massing.
In an attempt to break up the relentless language of the massing, a new massing was introduced to createa new relationship and create new relationships.
3
002
3B Design Studio
Instructor: Herwig Baumgartner Spring 2017 Partner: Anna Bahudian
Iteration_3:
The massing was rearranged so that the middle mass had more volume as well as having the peripheral objects closer to the ground.
This studio project is an Art Gallery/Library located in Berkely, California. Through formaly analyzing Hans Scharoun’s plans, my partner and I extracted geometry to construct different massings. The final massing is contrived of separate extrusions embedded with each other. The massing acts like a three-dimensional puzzle with its pieces carefully shifted, creating a division of mass and space. The form cantilevers out towards a downslope and acts as a large ceiling for public outdoor space. The facade system was designed as a directional collection of extrusions that subtly morph into puncturing aperatures. The flurry of facade expresses a overwhelming sense of wholeness, combining the seperate masses with its directionalities. Large panes of glass drop from the facade and surround the central canyons creating large light-wells and intersection viewpoints.
Iteration_6:
Relationships to the other massing are resolved and the massing is lifted off the ground to suggest a more indifferent relationship to the site.
The programmatic organization is derived from the massing divisions. The central massing becomes the main space for bookstacks and circulation. The surrounding cantilevers each become a program or transition space. The circulation is also pushed alongside the light-well canyons.
3B Design Studio/ AMIGAA: Articulation and Tectonics II/Baumgartner, Spina, Thomsen, Wu
003
Program Diagram
Programmatic Organization The general massing of the building consists of one central mass with cantalevering pieces surrounding and intersecting the centerpiece. This allows a public central into the Earth creating a very open and public space beneath the cantalevers. Spaces next couple levels of the building come the cantalevers and the centerpiece. The cantalevers becomes spaces that branch out from the central bookstacks, becoming but still accessable to the central bookstacks. The top canatalevers become garden
Programmatic Organization
The general massing of the building consists of one central mass with cantalevering pieces surrounding and intersecting the centerpiece. This allows a public central into the Earth creating a very open and public space beneath the cantalevers. Spaces next couple levels of the building come the cantalevers and the centerpiece. The cantalevers becomes spaces that branch out from the central bookstacks, becoming but still accessable to the central bookstacks. The top canatalevers become garden
Program
7 3
Book Stacks Reading Rooms Service ProgramOffices Exhibition Book Stacks ReadingAuditorium Rooms Service Lobby Offices Exhibition Cafe Auditorium Garden Lobby Core Cafe
25 7 3
20
31.5
2
25
6.5 31.5
5
2
Garden Core
Level 1
Level 1
004
20
14
6.5
6
6
5 14
6
6
Level 2
Level 3
Level 2
Level 4
Level 3
31.5
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
3B Design Studio/ AMIGAA: Articulation and Tectonics II/Baumgartner, Spina, Thomsen, Wu
Level 4
Level 5
3B Design Studio/ AMIGAA: Articulation and Tectonics II/Baumgartner, Spina, Thomsen, Wu
005
Circulation Diagram
Circulation
is very open and public, there are two main entries into the building. One is through The other main entrance is through the front doors located in the central void caving
located adjacent to the building’s canyons allowing a dynamic view when circulating.
Level 1
006
Level 2
Level 3
he building. One is through
ed in the central void caving
amic view when circulating.
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
3B Design Studio/ AMIGAA: Articulation and Tectonics II/Baumgartner, Spina, Thomsen, Wu
Level 4
Level 5
3B Design Studio/ AMIGAA: Articulation and Tectonics II/Baumgartner, Spina, Thomsen, Wu
007
Floor Plans
Ground Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Fourth Floor Plan
Fifth Floor Plan
1/32 Scale :
008
1” 1/32” = 1’
N
N 1/16 Scale :
1” 1/16” = 1’
Third Floor Plan
009
Section
010
+ 76’
+ 63’
+ 50’
+ 36’ - 10”
+19’
0’ - 00”
- 19’ - 00”
011
Axon Render
012
013
Model Photos
014
015
Model Photos
016
017
Exterior Shell Diagram
018
4A Design Studio Instructor: David Ruy Fall 2017
In this studio, we were asked to develop a duplex residence in the Boyle Heights district of the greater county of Los Angeles. This project explores the issues of the site and context in relation to architecture in theory and practice. Boyle Heights is in a transitional state of gentrification while in tension of resistance by the Boyle Heights locals. My project sits in Mariachi Plaza, a very public area hosting farmer markets as well as anti-gentrification protests. My project approaches this site as an autonomous object, taking neither side of gentrification nor the nostalgic locals. But rather my project introduces a new way to look at architecture from the perspectives of the local public. My project also responds to architectural theory and practice by taking both sides of objective and subjective design. In response to the presence of commercial architecture at the site, my project creates a simple massing to utilize the area given by the site and zoning codes. This massing, made up of white stucco walls and clear glazing, represses articulation to emphasize space and circulation. This massing is then covered by a very porous thick shell made up of steel. This shell is meant to provide many architectural features such as shade, diffused light, articulated entries, column structures, and spaces for conduits. The shell is treated opposite from its mass, its form generated by aesthetic and subjectivity. 019
Volumetric Layers Diagram
Exterior Mass
Inbetween Void
Interior Mass
020
Volumetric Spaces Diagram
ea
sa
nt
Ave nu
Pl
e
Site Plan: Mariachi Plaza, Boyle Heights
Av en
Nor
th B
oyl e
ue
ay reew I-5 F
Mariachi Plaza Metro Station
South Boyle
Avenue
East 1st Street
021
Ground Floor Plan
022
Additional Floor Plans
023
Section
on
Scale: 1/8” = 1’
024
Elevation
025
Interior Renders
026
027
Circulation Renders
028
029
Contextual Elevation
030
031
Model Photos
032
033
Model Photos
034
035
Renaissance Object 1
036
4B Design Studio Instructor: Coy Howard Spring 2018
In this studio, we were asked to create a museum center for Italian and Japanese artifacts. The main objective of this studio was to be able to synthesis two different cultures into one by appropriating similar sensibilities with one another. The initial study was about the synthesis of the two cultures dating back from their Renaissance era. By using images of artifacts, I created five new objects that supposedly hybridizes the two cultures. The scroll shows the radical abstraction away from either cultures, but rather eludes back to them with subtle hints of relevance. The building transitions the sensibilities learned from the scroll into an architecture project. The building is of Place/Form, meaning its form is directly related to its context. The site being on Broadway in Downtown Los Angeles, I wanted to bring primitive nature back into the concrete metropolis of downtown. The street front facade of the building uses similar building tropes from the context including the false facade, the tripartition, and the vertical continuity of both side ends. Spatial Tactility is used in the gallery and library. One being a long horizontal space in opposition with a wide vertical space, separated by an open air courtyard. The circulation is developed as Episodic Moments. These become spaces that show multiple paths or destinations, allowing the viewer to choose his/her way to go.
037
Renaissance Object 2
038
Renaissance Object 3
039
Renaissance Object 4
040
Renaissance Object 5
041
Renaissance Scroll
042
043
Entrance Elevation Perspective
044
045
Cross Street Perspective
046
Adjacent Sidewalk Perspective
047
Interior Courtyard Perspective
048
Courtyard Exit Perspective
049
Entry Circulation Perspective
050
Library Gallery Perspective
051
Lower Gallery Perspective
052
Upper Gallery Perspective
053
Plan
054
Section
055
Worm’s Eye/Bird’s Eye Axon
Bird’s Eye / Worm’s Eye Axon
056
5A Design Studio Instructor: Eric Owen Moss Fall 2018 Partner: Sarah Carcamo
We initially started the design through a formal anaylsis of the site and its existing conditions. This project is a large scale office and commercial building located in Culver City. Since the site is nested along a large hillside, this became the base datum for design. Programmatic bars extrude perpendicular from the hillside and float above the ground. Their intersections and inbetween spaces start to create additional programmtic spaces. A large mass is accumulated in the center which becomes the main commercial program. Modular office spaces are attached to the bars, enabling a new type of movable offices to accommodate various sized spaces. As the building floats above the ground, its solar projection carves away into the ground. On the ground is outdoor public space with projected walkways. In the ground are large projected canyons that provide indoor/ outdoor commercial spaces.
057
Site Plan
Site Plan
058
Scale: 1/64”=1’
Floor Plan
Typical Plan
Scale: 1/32”=1’
059
Sections
Section A (South)
Section B (West)
060
B
A
N
061
Perspective Renders
062
063
Section Model Photos
064
065
Site Model Photos
066
067
Site Model Photos
068
069
Site Plan
070
5B Thesis Design Studio Instructor: Marcelo Spina Spring 2019 Partners: Hannah Lee & Will Wang
Our thesis is a prototype of dynamic architecture that adapts to changing climate conditions. Due to the frequency of hurricanes, typhoons, and rising sea levels, our thesis acknowledges the direction towards flooded coasts and prioritizes future adaptibilty over static preservation. To tackle a large coastal project requiring various program to coexist, we chose Tongyeong Dockyards as the tip of the South Korean peninsula as our site. The site is a retired ship-building dockyard at two million square feet, and we propose to revitalise the coexistence of ocean and land. To create permeable conditions between confineed interiors and the expansive exterior, we propose an enclosure consisting of protective layers. This is a biodome-like structure built from porous layers instead of a single surface fully-enclosed membrane. The interior consists of objects within objects--standard units creating volume within suspended shells. The cubic coraline volumes move vertically to control water surges. The built ground extends the controlled flood into the building, transforming a once dry promenade into a wet stream of marine life. This large mixed-use development allows the controlled ruination of the enviornment to support the decreasing marine ecosystems.
Projected Date: April 20 2119 Projected Sea Level: +24 FT
These components together produce an enviornment that offers diversity by balancing dense urban settlements with natural systems. With half of the world’s population living within 150km of the coast, a large site like this can offer refuge for many. As humans migrate inland, we aim to expand the tools and means of architecture that edifies the surrounding changes in its enduring buoyancy. An adaptable monument in which the ruination of the ground is an opportunity for other life forms. 071
Plan
072
Cross Section
073
Long Section
074
075
Elevation
076
077
Presentation Photo
078
Model Photo
079
Model Photos
080
081
Model Photos
082
083
Model Photos
084
085
Site Plan
Client
City of Berkeley
Architect
University of California, Berkeley Campus
Bancroft Way
Lihan Li Donna Jimeno Joseph Suh Andrew Han Derek Yan
Bancroft Way Main Pedestrian Site Entry Consultant
College Avenue
Bowditch Street
BERKELEY PUBLIC LIBRARY
Main Building Entry
Scott Uriu Pavel Getov Matthew Melnyk Jamey Lyzun
Entry/Exit
2626 Bankroft Way Berkeley, California
Above Building Cantilevers
Entry/Exit
Entry/Exit
First Floor Garage Main Car Garage Entry
Content
Siteplan Durant Avenue
Durant Avenue
College Avenue
Bowditch Street
Drawing Revision NO.
Description
Sheet No.
A13
086
Date
4A AS Design Development Instructors: Scott Uriu & Pavel Getov Fall 2017 Partners: Donna Jimeno, Derek Yen, James Li, & Jospeh Suh
In this class, we were asked to further progress a past 3B project into the design development phase. This meaning resolving any structural and performance issues without compromising the design. The project selected was originally designed by fellow students Hannah Lee and Joseph Suh. The main issue in this project was resolving the structure of the entire building. The building also includes a large cantilever in which we had to incorporate steel trusses in that specific area. By adding large steel frame structures with another secondary layer of framing, we were able to stand the building completely wrapped in glazing. With the glazing mass structurally sound, we incorporated attachment pins in order to connect our curtain wall facade back to the structure. The following drawing sheets in this portfolio were of my sole responsibility. The completed work was due to our group’s collective effort, but I was in charge of these specific drawings and finalizing them.
087
Floor Plan
1
3
2
5
4
10° 20’
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
088
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
20’
13
14
80°
Reflective Ceiling Plan
1
3
2
5
4
10°
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
20’
13
14
80°
20’
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
LEGEND
K Ceiling Panels
Linear Diffu
L
Linear Ligh
M
Fire Sprinkle
Square Ligh
089
Floor to Primary Structure Detail
5
1
3
4
6
5
2
7
8
1
090
3
2
Floor to Primary Structure Section
Primary Structure to Mullion Section
5
Primary Structure to Facade Detail
7
10
1 Client
City of Berkeley
2
Architect
Lihan Li Donna Jimeno Joseph Suh Andrew Han Derek Yan Consultant
7
8
9
10
2626 Bankroft Way Berkeley, California
1
Scott Uriu Pavel Getov Matthew Melnyk Jamey Lyzun
RKELEY PUBLIC LIBRARY
5
Primary Structure to Mullion Section
091
Wall Section
2 A19
Aluminum Panel
Tinted Glass Panel
Exterior Panel Structure Frame Insulating Glazing Secondary Structure Tube
Primary Structure Tube
HVAC Supply Duct
1 A19
Fire Sprinkler
1 A18
Concrete Floor Slab W 24x162 Flange Beam Distribution Pipe Service Pipe Gypsum Board
Structural Curb Concrete Slab
2’ Square Columns
092
1 A4
2 A5
3 A6
093
Primary Structure
Concrete Cores
2’ Steel Tube Frame 1.5’ Steel Tube Truss
Parking Garage
094
Internal Structure
Concrete Cores
2’ I-Beam Floor Frame
2’ Square Columns
095
Seconday Structure
Double Pane Glass
Square Grided Brace Frame
096
Facade Structure
Black Glass Facade
Silver Aluminum Facade
097
Perspective Render
098
4B AS Construction Documents Instructor: David Ross & Pavel Getov Spring 2018 Partners: Donna Jimeno, James Li, Jospeh Suh, & Randall Zaragoza
In this class, we were asked to create a building that consists of a gallery, an office, and a small home. But the challenging part was building the entire thing in a new program: Autodesk Revit. With the help of this application, we were able to quickly and precisely develop construction documents without the hassle of post-production issues. Much like the past design development class, this class also focuses on the buildings structure and performance. But this class takes it a little further, having to figure out facade system structures as well as details of structure and enclosure. The most important issues our building presented were the facade structure and the glazing enclosure. The wooden beam facade needed a completely different structure from the building, but also needed a way to connect back to the buildings structure. Since most of the work was done collectively in Revit, the drawings were not strictly done by one person. So i do credit these drawings to my entire group. But for these following drawings, I either had most of the input or responsibility.
099
Floor Plan
9
8
1
7
A4.3
10' - 0"
10' - 0"
5
6
10' - 0"
10' - 0"
4
3
10' - 0"
10' - 0"
1
2
A4.2
10' - 0"
1
10' - 0"
5' - 0"
A
A.1 4
ADA RESTROOM 102 86 SF
WA-2
1 A7.1
WA-4
5' - 0"
A7.1
C
A
3B 2
5D
B
46
54
GALLERY 100 1796 SF
32
ADA RESTROOM 101 88 SF
10' - 0"
WA-3
WA-4
C 43
1 A7.3
10' - 0"
WA-1
UP
WA-4
1 A4.1
A7.3 3F
2
ELEVATOR 0 80 SF
52
10' - 0"
4
E
STAIR 0 222 SF
G
38
D
5H
E UP
5' - 0"
DN
5' - 0"
E.1 200mm Floor Light
F
100
Reflective Ceiling Plan
9
8
1 A4.3
7
6
5
4
3
2
1 A4.2
1
A
A7.1
4
6
3'-3"
A7.1
5D
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
ADA RESTROOM
8'-0 3/4"
A.1
8'-0 3/4"
B
7'-0"
102
10'-0"
86 SF
10'-0"
C
A
2
10'-0"
3'-5 3/8"
10'-0" 3B
GALLERY 100 1801 SF
ADA RESTROOM 101
8'-0 3/4"
4'-6 1/4"
3'-10"
3'-11 1/2"
0
222 SF
80 SF
5H G
A7.3
E
4
2
8'-0 3/4"
8'-0 3/4"
3'-3"
0
10'-0"
ELEVATOR STAIR
C
8'-0 3/4" 10'-0"
10'-0"
3'-3"
88 SF
9'-11 31/32"
3'-10"
1 A4.1
D
3F
E
E.1
F
101
Structure Details
WOODEN BEAM STEEL ANGLE JOINT (FACADE) CONCRETE STRUCTURAL CURB
1/2” BOLT
EXTERIOR FLOOR FINISH
CONCRETE SLAB
STEEL I-BEAM 8X20
WATERPROOFING
GROUND FLOOR SECTION 1-1/2” = 1’
WOODEN BEAM
WOODEN BEAM
1/2” BOLTS METAL PLATE
METAL PLATE
WOODEN SHIM
STEEL I-BEAM 8X20 1/2” BOLTS
STEEL ANGLE JOINT
WOODEN SHIM
STEEL I-BEAM 8X20
STEEL ANGLE JOINT
SECTION JOINT 1-1/2” = 1’
102
1
3
TOP SECTION JOINT 1-1/2” = 1’
4
Facade Details
WOODEN BEAM STEEL ANGLE JOINT (FACADE)
STEEL I-BEAM 8X20 STEEL I-BEAM 6X12 STEEL ANGLE JOINT
STEEL ANGLE JOINT STEEL I-BEAM W10X33
WOODEN BEAM 1/4” BOLT
STEEL I-BEAM 8X20
STEEL I-BEAM W10X33
ROOF COLUMN SECTION
2
1-1/2” = 1’
FLOOR FINISH CONCRETE CAST STEEL ANGLE STEEL I-BEAM W12X26 STEEL ANGLE JOINT 1” BOLTS GYPSUM BOARD WATERPROOFING GYPSUM BOARD
FLOOR PLATE SECTION 1-1/2” = 1’
5 103
Wall Sections
WOOD BLOCK PRECAST CONCRETE WATERPROOFING FLASHING ADHESIVE WOOD BLOCK 2” RIGID INSULATION 1” THERMAL BARRIER METAL DECKING STEEL ANGLE CAST CONCRETE
ROOF 32' - 4 1/4"
W12X26 I-BEAM FIREPROOFING CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT BATT INSULATION
5/8” GYPSUM WALL FINISH 5/8” CONCRETE FLOOR FINISH
GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
1/2” EXPANSION JOINT
4” DRAINAGE PIPE
WATERPROOFING
VAPOR BARRIER
RIGID INSULATION
3’X4’ CONCRETE FOOTING
104
2.5”X6” WOODEN BEAM WOODEN SHIM STEEL ANGLE JOINT
8X20 I-BEAM
6X12 I-BEAM
WOOD BLOCK PRECAST CONCRETE FLASHING ADHESIVE WATERPROOFING WOOD BLOCK 2” RIGID INSULATION 1” THERMAL BARRIER METAL DECKING W12X26 I-BEAM
ROOF 32' - 4 1/4"
BATT INSULATION 5/8” GYPSUM BOARD FIREPROOFING
GLAZING MULLION
DOUBLE GLAZING LIFTED EXTERIOR FLOOR FINISH TILTED STEEL FLASHING 5/8” GYPSUM BOARD BATT INSULATION WATERPROOFING
MULLION SEALENT WOOD BLOCKS GLAZING MULLION W12X26 I-BEAM
INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH
7” CONNECTION BOLT RIGID INSULATION WATERPROOFING VAPOR BARRIER CONCRETE FOUNDATION
105
Texture Collage
106
5A VS Becoming More You Instructor: Coy Howard Fall 2018
In this class, we were asked to compile a large collection of images based on certain subjects. This exercise allowed us to deductively hone our own aesthetic preferences. Throught multiple creative exercises we used those collection of images to produce collages that best represent our aesthetic bias. After the collection and collaging, we moved on to more creative works that were not just imaged based. This included creating fashion clothing, typography, and furniture. Through a diversity of creative exercises, we were able to explore and discover more about ourselves and our design tendencies.
107
Photography Collage
108
Renaissance Collage
109
Object Collage 1
110
Object Collage 2
111
Sideways Glance Photo
112
Trivial Familiar Photo
113
Transient Presence Photo
114
Metaphorical Photo
115
Furniture Top View
116
Furniture Elevation
117
Furniture Perspectives
118
119