No court has inherent authority to decide matter for which no legally cognizable-Anne Kihagi

NO COURT HAS INHERENT AUTHORITY TO DECIDE MATTER FOR WHICH NO LEGALLY COGNIZABLE CAUSE OF ACTION -ANNE KIHAGI

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

No court has inherent authority to decide matter for which no legally cognizable-Anne Kihagi

Published on Nov 18, 2022

The above is a simple example of one of the 20 violations we have been subjected to by Judge Charles F. Haines. The law is clear that: “No court has inherent authority to decide matter for which no legally cognizable cause of action.” Dabney v. Dabney, 104 Cal.App.4th 379, 382-83 (Cal. 2002). This means that, without first issuing a 3-Day Notice and following the eviction process, the judge is without ANY power to act and issue its Order. Despite not having a case to rule on for the subject of eviction, Judge Haines used his power to sign an Order that was used by attorneys with knowledge of the violation of law and assuming we would never have an opportunity to fight back.

Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.