Futurism Catalogue

Page 1



Art and design is where it is today because of

time of fear, rejection, shock, upheaval and war. The

its past. Without daring experiments, the pushing of

world was moving faster than it was a decade earlier

boundaries, the breaking of rules and the ability to

and many people rejected the change. Futurism

think critically and conceptually, the art of art would

embraced the change. Futurists were fascinated with

have faded with time. Like anything else, art has

the idea of speed, motion, rhythm and the growth

evolved. It changes with time, people, culture and

of the city. They supported the rejection of the past,

situations and although some may disagree there

the acceptance of the future and the idea that war

is no wrong way to create it. Art is expression and

was a good way to solve problems and clean up

expression is volatile and limitless. Art demonstrates

the world. Futurism often illustrated the turmoil of

that every single one of us sees the world differently

change that was occurring, the battle between man

and that beauty truly lies in the eye of the beholder.

and machine. It also was another stepping stone

Futurism is no exception. In the bigger picture

toward non-objective art and the idea that emotion

of art Futurism is often overlooked and forgotten

could be expressed through line and color.

simply because it lacks the fame that some of the

This exhibit features ten Futurist painters. Five

other “isms� have. However, it deserves the proper

of them are Russian women and five of them are

recognition because its ideals introduced a new way

Italian men. This group of artists demonstrates how

of thinking and its artists were heavy influences on

different expression can be between gender and

later forms of art such as Suprematism and Con-

culture. All of these artists are classified as Futurists,

structivism.

however they all have a different style and view. Al-

Futurism came about during a time of dras-

though Futurism is not as well known as some other

tic change. Europe and North America were in the

stylistic movements, it is imperative we remember it

middle of an industrial revolution. The idea of mass

and learn from it. It is part of the chain reaction that

production and the use of heavy machinery to per-

got us to where we are today and it deserves to be

form difficult tasks was becoming a reality. It was a

recognized as so. -Annmarie Barlow Curator


RUSSIAN

Alexandra Exter Natalia Goncharova Liubove Popova Olga Rozanova Nadezhda Udaltsova

FUTURISM


ALEXANDRA EXTER Alexandra Exter was born in the Ukraine and grew up in Kiev. She also attended art school in Kiev and although she moved around a lot in her life she

and Futurism combined with Russian and Ukrainian subject matter. Although Exter acknowledged the value of Ital-

always returned there. The city of Kiev was a large

ian Futurism, she did not fully embrace its doctrine.

influence on Exter’s work. Throughout her life there

Exter was not interested in the “vehicle hurtling

Exter developed a love for Ukranian folk culture,

through space that so fascinated Boccioni and his

which she studied, promoted and even exhibited.

colleagues”. Exter’s work is characteristic of explo-

In the fall of 1907 Exter went to Paris. At the

sive color and dynamic movement, yet her paintings

time, Cubism was becoming a notable style and Ex-

do not feel chaotic. Instead, her paintings feel like

ter recognized its potential. She had the opportunity

careful arrangements of form and color based off of

to meet artists Picasso and Braque. In her encounters

aesthetic principals.

with Braque and Picasso Exter discovered partial

In Still-Life with Eggs we see that careful ar-

answers to problems surrounding the relationship

rangement and Exter’s love for Ukrainian folklore.

between surface and volume, form and texture and

There is the spirit of folk murals, traditional em-

composition and rhythm. However, Exter did not

broideries and Easter table decorations painted in

agree with how Cubists used color.

a non-objective Futurist manner. Exter also heavily

Color was extremely important to her Exter’s

influenced the art of stage and costume design by

work. Exter did not introduce the term “Cubo-Futur-

bringing Cubism into the discipline of theater.

ism” and was not even around Russia when the term

Ester was more than an artist; she was an

was coined. Nevertheless Exter utilized “Cubo-Futur-

inventor, a discoverer, an intellectual and a teacher.

ism” and tried to adapt it to the demands of Russian

She was not afraid to go looking for new things

art. At the time Russian art leaned toward the artis-

but never forgot where she came from. She will be

tic styles of Gleizes, Metzinger and Le Fauconnier.

remembered not only for her art but also for her

Therefore Exter’s art became a mixture of Cubism

versatility and ambition.


NATALIA GONCHAROVA Natalia Sergeevna Goncharova was born on

However, she completed the studio exercises she

June 21, 1881 in the village of Nagaevo. Her father

would have needed to finish her schooling at the

was an architect and her immediate family was well

Moscow Institute. While at the Moscow Institute

educated. Growing up, Goncharova was educated by

she met Larionov who became her most influential

her mother and grandmother. When Goncharova was

instructor and eventually her husband many years

twelve she attended the Fourth Women’s Gymna-

later. Larionov showed Goncharova the advent-garde

sium until she graduated in 1898. Goncharova tried

exhibitions organized in Moscow.

several different career paths including history, zool-

Goncharova’s work as whole incorporated both

ogy, botany and medicine. She eventually decided

Eastern and Western traditions and it initiated mul-

to become a sculptor and she attended the Moscow

tiple movements and manifestos including Cubo-Fu-

Institute of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture in

turism. The Cyclist is oil on canvas done in 1913 and

the fall of 1901. Spending time in both the country and city,

it is regarded as a very conventional Futurist painting in both Goncharova’s body of work as a whole and in

Goncharova was torn between the two. The contra-

Russian art of the early 1900s. It has typical Futur-

diction between the fast paced urban life of Moscow

ist features such as repetition, displacement of the

and the slow simple life of the country was a heavy

shapes of the figure and the injection of fragmented

influence on Goncharova’s work. Goncharova’s early

street signs. It differs from Italian Futurism because

work with pastels and painting reflect the rural

the composition of the painting is both horizontally

environment of her family’s countryside estate. She

and vertically balanced.

was most intrigued by the peasants and servant’s daily activities. Goncharova had training in the visual arts at

Goncharova was extremely influential artist in not only Russian Futurism, but also in Russian Art because she was more than just an artist of her time.

both the art institute and in independent studios.

Her ideals and aesthetics were carried on and her

She withdrew from the Moscow Institute in 1909.

work is still honored and admired today.


LIUBOVE POPOVA Liubove Popova grew up in a well-educated mer-

work. However, Popova’s method changed after she

chant family. Popova always had a strong interest in

saw Cubo-Futurist paintings such as Malevich’s The

art and particularly Italian Renaissance painting. Her

Knife-Grinder and Goncharova’s The Bicyclist.

interest in Italian Renaissance painting is seen in her

Popova was extremely interested in the way

abstract paintings from 1916 to 1917. Renaissance

those two paintings conflicted two different forms

characteristics in her abstract paintings include a

of energy and combined the perception of the object

highly accurate sense of up and down, frontal focus

with its environment. She began to experiment with

in the structure of form, and close attention to fore-

abstract patterns and rhythms and created her on

ground and/or surface. The center of Popova’s com-

Cubo-Futurist works. In Popova’s Cubo-Futurist

position is often fixed and relationships are defined

works we see an adequate balance between the

by proportion. One of the most impressive attributes

“centrifugal” and the “centripetal”. These paintings

of Popova’s work was the way she combined the

also demonstrate an agreement between body, ob-

style of Russian art with the style of Italian Renais-

ject and negative space, which set them apart from

sance painting.

French Cubism.

At the same time she visited St. Petersburg to

The Pianist demonstrates the difference in

study Italian Renaissance painting she also visited

interpretation of Cubist form and space between the

the ancient cities of Russia including Kiev, No-

Russians and the French. The Pianist has a fron-

vogorod, Pskov, Yaroslavl, Rostov and Suzdal. After

tal view of the face while the hand is shown from

studying both styles of art, Popova discovered, using

the side and the keyboard is shown from above.

her own logic based off of color contrast and numer-

Popova’s work eventually evolved into a Supremist/

ical relationships, that the art of Old Russia and Ital-

Constructivist style in the same way the Malevich’s

ian Renaissance painting shared classical logic on an

did. However her work maintained the “centrifugal”

abstract level. Popova was inspired by not only the

and “centripetal” nature that was characteristic of

common logic, but also the religious subject matter,

Cubo-Futurism. Popova’s work changed several

the wooden boards on which the art was painted,

times in her life and her diverse body of work stands

nature and the human figure. The human figure and

today as a reflection of her versatility as both an art-

nature underwent rigorous transformations in her

ist and a person.


ITALIAN

Giacomo Balla Umberto Boccini Carlo Carra Luigi Russolo Gino Severini

FUTURISM


GIACOMO BALLA Giacomo Balla was a Futurist but his work

a new abstract language to the service of the Futur-

belongs in a category all its own. He was ahead of

ist desire to capture the simultaneity of everyday

his time experimenting with artificial light and its

life focused on political aspirations”. Girl Running

association with machinery, an attribute that would

on Balcony illustrates Balla’s studies on “how light

become symbolic of Futurism style. In his work we

dematerializes bodies in action”. The blocks of color

see everything from pictorial components to the

poured over the surface give the painting a mosaic

introduction of an abstract language, all under the

look. Here we see Balla’s style of repeated fragments

category of Futurism.

with a serious of repeating heads, legs, railing and

Balla was not affected nor inspired by Cub-

skits. The color blocks distract the viewer from notic-

ism, nor was he interested in the conflict between

ing the precise position of the girl’s sprint. Every-

man and machine. He was strictly concerned with

thing that is happening in this scene is occurring

“presenting one fragmented episode in a continuum

simultaneously, there is no elapsed time. However,

of motion. He concentrated on how a dachshund

this is contradictory because we as the viewer know

scurries, a violinist plays and a girl runs”. In his work

that this event took place over a period of time. As

you see “units of progression” used to illustrate the

a result, Balla creates a “generalized space, neither

particular activity. Balla was very precise in determin-

illusively deep nor palpably flat, lacking planes yet

ing which elements needed to be repeated and over-

avoiding openness”.

lapped to express “motor activity”. He had a much

Balla never fully accepted all the fundamentals

more “sensory” approach to imitating force lines as

of Futurism but rather molded the fundamentals

opposed to an emotional or intellectual one.

of Futurism to meet his stylistic needs. This ability

Force lines were a standard of Futurism that Balla had not fully accepted. Patriotic Demonstration, one of his interventionist paintings of 1915 “brought

allowed him to push the boundaries of Futurism as both a style and a way of thinking.


UMBERTO BOCCIONI Umberto Boccioni is often associated with and

lines and “dynamic compenetration of planes”. How-

known for his sculptures. However, his sculptures,

ever, there is still implied movement. In his second

although beautiful and impressive, were not his only

version of The Farewells Boccioni created volumes

contribution to Futurism. His triptych States of Mind

that appeared to revolve and outline the space oc-

is among his body of work as a Futurist painter.

cupied by a couple embracing, the presence of a

States of Mind shown at the first Futurist exhibi-

sitting locomotive and the heart-wrenching feeling

tion in Paris in 1912 alongside seven other pieces

that often comes with saying goodbye.

by Boccioni. The intention of these pieces was to

In the second versions of both Those Who Go

illustrate the feeling and movement of a crowd using

and Those Who Stay there is a blanket of lines in the

non-objective shapes. They were done in a Neo-

forground creating “prismatic” forms, which hide

Impressionistic style. The pieces play off the Futurist

the characters. In Those Who Go the diagonal blue

fundamental of simultaneity. Boccioni “renewed

lines produce motion traveling from left to right.

the Futurist enterprise: it was no longer a matter of

We see the dim lights inside the railway car and the

merely depicting the speed of a machine or the ef-

city fading into the distance through a window. The

fects of light, but of transcribing the movements of

painted faces are those of sleeping passengers, and

the soul at the heart of a separation punctuated by

their expressions reflect sadness. Those Who Stay

three related circumstances”.

is almost monochromatic. The static nature of the

The three circumstances that are referred to are

figures is expressed through the use of vertical lines.

The Farewells, Those Who Go and Those Who Stay,

The string of figures stretches from the bottom left

each one painted on a separate canvas. The railway

corner to the top right indicating the perspective of a

station, he train and the journey are all Futurist

person riding away on the train.

themes that show the interaction of man and the

Boccioni’s sculptural contributions to Futur-

mechanized world. These themes also evoke the

ism were masterpieces and were very influential to

bittersweet emotions associated with leaving. After

the style as a whole. However, one cannot forget

the exhibition in Paris, Boccioni painted the second

Boccioni’s paintings and his ability to express a vast

rendition of States of Mind in a much more Futurism

array of emotions on a single canvas.

style. In his second set of paintings there were force


NADEZHDA UDALTSOVA Nadezhda Udaltsova was surrounded by a lot of

She stood close by her aesthetic principles. The

tragedy in her life. Her mother died when she was

Restaurant for example shows Udaltsova’s ability

twenty-seven, her father was killed by the Bolsheviks

to incorporate form and lettering, light and shade

and her husband was killed also. The only thing

and relief and plane without sacrificing the

that kept Udaltsova going was her passion for art.

art of painting.

Udaltsova was born in 1885. In 1995 at the age of

Although Udaltsova was a Russian artist, the

twenty she enrolled in the art school of Konstantin

art of painting which was a European tradition,

Yuon and Ivan Dudin. A few years later in 1908

remained very important to her throughout her

Udaltsova visited the Shchukin collection. In that

career. She painted in terms of precise, conceptual,

same year she attempted to get into the Moscow

immense compositions. Udaltsova dwelled in Russia

Institute of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture, but

for the majority of her life, but her love for European

was not accepted. The following year Udaltsova stud-

art shows heavily in her work. A particular European

ied at La Palette in Paris under the direction of Henri

style that Udaltstova was receptive to was French

Le Fauconnier, Kean Metzinger and Andre Dunoyer

Cubism. Restaurant is an example of Udaltsova’s

de Segonzac. At La Palette Udaltsova studied the

Russian Cubo-Futurism work. However, it is said that

“grammar” of Cubism.

Restaurant has a “distinctive fan-shaped composi-

She returned to Moscow in 1914 at the age of

tion, echoing the volumetric-spatial structures of

29 where she debuted with fellow Russian Futurist,

Cubism”. Restaurant also has fragmented text, which

Liubov Popova, at an exhibition in Moscow called

is “introduced into the painting with the intention of

Jack of Diamonds. Udaltsova’s education in Cubism

evoking a series of sensations associated with life,

helped her tremendously and she accepted Cubism

noise, pulse and constantly changing impressions of

as a new way of thinking, making and interpreting

a large city “. These attributes are characteristic of

art. Udaltsovas treatment of space in her paintings

Italian Futurism once again we see Udaltsova’s love

from 1914-1915 sometimes resembled beehives.

and admiration for European art.



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.