7 team 5

Page 1

sea in the city team 5


• urban design analysis

Source: h5p://workjournal.archipelago.gr/

§  Important western gateway to Athens §  2012: 850000 passengers, 190000 lorries §  (Piraeus 2012: 18m passengers, 2.73m containers) Source: www.horizonsunlimited.com/

Analysis role of Patras city

freight / port

Intercity passenger traffic

suburban transport

urban design


• urban design analysis

§  Third biggest city in Greece (180.000 residents) §  Regional employment and educational centre (30000 students)

Source: h5p://upload.wikimedia.org/

Analysis role of Patras city

freight / port

Intercity passenger traffic

suburban transport

urban design


§  Good road access to new Port §  Transport of freight by train not feasible because: §  various destinations §  train more expensive for freight companies §  much longer journey times than motorway (waiting, loading, unloading) §  lorry drivers can rest in ferry so no benefits from train travel §  not enough freight (1-2 trains per day)

Analysis role of Patras city

freight / port

Intercity passenger traffic

suburban transport

urban design


§  Patras – Athens: car/coach (≈2.5 hours) §  High demand for train connection to Athens (≈2 hours) §  Building completion date : unknown §  Improvements important but not urgent

Analysis role of Patras city

freight / port

intercity passenger traffic

suburban transport

urban design


§  New suburban train very popular §  Potential for expansion §  Improvements to public transport network: urgent

Analysis role of Patras city

freight / port

intercity passenger traffic

suburban transport

urban design


§  City center cut from waterfront §  New port allows changes in old port (public space, land use, design)

green urban areas city ports city center railway division city / waterfront

Analysis role of Patras city

freight / port

intercity passenger traffic

suburban transport

urban design


§  Freight à road §  Trainline to port: route protected but inactive Benefits 1.  Freight rail connection to port not needed (no new investment) 2.  No freight trains in residential areas or through city centre 3.  Future train line to port remains possible (night trains?) §  Idea: transfer of freight port to Rio? (allows later freight train connection if necessary)

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


§  Athens à Agios Dionisios: Intercity double / single train line along planned route (Patras: all overground) §  Agios Vassilios à Agios Dionisios: 3 track system to enable normal gauge trains and metric gauge trams §  (Agios Dionisios à Agios Andreas: tram) §  Agios Andreas à south: metric gauge line protected but inactive §  Building costs Patras – Rododafni: ≈€500m (±50%)
 Benefits 1.  Connection city-seafront possible 2.  Based on existing plans à low costs

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Phase 0: suburban trainline today

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Phase 1 §  Agios Dionisios à Agios Vassilios: existing trains §  Agios Andreas à University / hospital: electric tram service (≈40 min) §  Building costs: €50m §  New trams: €25m
 Benefits 1.  Tram network connects dense residential areas, employment centres, hospital and university (24000 students) 2.  City is ready for intercity trains (no dependencies)

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Phase 2 §  Extention of tram system to the new port (90% existing line) §  Building costs: €25m §  New trams: €6m

Benefits 1.  Connection city-port for foot passengers (≈1000 per day) 2.  Potential for economic revitalisation of port area

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Phase 3 §

Extention of tram system from Agios Andreas to the Technical Institute / Stadium

§

Building costs: €40m

§

New trams: €3m

Benefits §

Connection of additional dense residential areas and Technical Institute / Stadium

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Phase 4 §  Transfer tram line away from the seafront §  Building costs: €20m Benefits 1.  Reconnection of the city with the seafront 2.  New promenade along the old tram line 3.  Shorter distances to shops and employment

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Phase 5 §  Transfer tram line away from the existing train line §  More trams §  Building costs: €25m §  New trams: €25m

Benefits 1.  Removes conflicts between train and tram 2.  Dense residential areas are still connected

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Extensions §

Possible extensions of suburban tram/ train network to the south

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


context Agios Dionisios

new land uses

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


terrain changes

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


Intersection landscape – train / tram station

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


VIsualisation

Concept freight

intercity passenger traffic

suburban public transport

timetable

urban intervention Agios Dionisios


sea in the city §

investment in the future of Patras

§

new development dynamic next to tram lines

§

use of existing lines à low costs

§

reconnection of the city to the seafront

§

flexible phasing

§

low dependency on national railway

§

new landscape approach to urban interventions

Thank you.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.