aaaa by andrew wilcox

2012 San Bernardino Urban Design Studio Cal Poly Pomona College of Environmental Design + AECOM Department of Architecture Department of Landscape Architecture Department of Urban and Regional Planning

CSU Pomona, College of Environmental Design + AECOM Copyright 2012 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona All rights reserved by the individual project authors who are solely responsible for their content

SBUD 2012

2012 Interdisciplinary Urban Design Studio

2012 San Bernardino Urban Design Studio Coordination Cal Poly Pomona College of Environmental Design + AECOM Associate Prof. Luis Hoyos RA Department of Architecture Associate Prof. Andrew O. Wilcox RLA Department of Landscape Architecture Professor Herschel Farberow Department of Urban and Regional Planning Vaughan Davies ISAA Principal, Director of Urban Design AECOM

This studio was made possible with the generous support of AECOM AECOM is a global provider of professional technical and management support services to a broad range of markets, including transportation, facilities, environmental, energy, water and government.

SBUD 2012

Table of Contents San Bernardino Interdisciplinary Urban Design Studio 7 Acknowledgements 8 A Message from the Dean 10 On Teamwork and Leadership- AECOM 12 Interdisciplinary Studio Description 14 Urban Design Master Plan Areas 16 Student Project Team Introduction 18 Project Thesis Statement 20 San Bernardino supporting background research + process + methodology 34 Student Project Master Plan 24 Individual Project Model Typologies

40 Individual Project Model Type ONE 46 Individual Project Model Type TWO 50 Individual Project Model Type THREE 58 Individual Project Model Type FOUR 64 Individual Project Model Type FIVE 70 Individual Project Model Type SIX 76 Individual Project Model Type SEVEN 84 Student Team Project Conclusions

SBUD 2012

Acknowledgements San Bernardino Interdisciplinary Urban Design Studio

A Message from the Dean Michael Woo, Dean, College of Environmental Design When I ﬁrst proposed to AECOM that they consider supporting an ENV Urban Design Studio, I pointed to Cal Poly Pomona’s “learnby-doing” approach and the rare opportunity for interdisciplinary cooperation which our College provides. After only ten weeks of intensive looking and thinking, the students have captured some of the possibilities for the future of downtown San Bernardino which may not have been visible or obvious to the local community. As you will see in their proposals contained in this booklet, the students have demonstrated an impressive level of professionalism. The students’s analytical work and creative visions for downtown San Bernardino have exceeded our hopes for this course.

Davies, Principal and Director of Urban Design at AECOM Design + Planning, who brought us together with the City of San Bernardino; Don Smith, AECOM Senior Vice President (and one of our ENV alumni); and to the many AECOM professionals who spent countless hours inspiring, observing, and commenting on our students’s work as it evolved over the course of Winter Quarter. The welcoming attitude from the City of San Bernardino ofﬁcials also added immeasurably to the success of the Urban Design Studio. We are very grateful to Emil Marzullo, Director of the Economic Development Agency, and Jeffrey M. Smith, AICP, Senior Urban Planner (and an alumnus of our Urban and Regional Planning Department), for taking a chance on us. And for taking several hours out of his busy schedule to listen to and comment on the student presentations on March 7, we thank the Honorable Patrick J. Morris, Mayor of the City of San Bernardino.

I would like to express our gratitude to AECOM’s leadership whose conﬁdence in our College and generosity made this Urban Design Studio possible: Richard G. Newman, Chairman of the AECOM Board of Directors (whom I count as an old friend dating back to his leadership role 25 years ago with DMJM); Joe Brown, Chief Executive, AECOM Planning, Design + In closing, I would to convey my personal thanks Development (whom I met through his leadership to the team of ENV faculty who shepherded role in the Urban Land Institute); Vaughan the students through an intensive, rigorous, and

ultimately very rewarding experience: Luis Hoyos of the Architecture Department (and the leader of the faculty team), Andy Wilcox of the Landscape Architecture Department; and Hersh Farberow of the Urban and Regional Planning Department. To all who played a role in the San Bernardino Urban Design Studio, I salute you for keeping the ENV “learn-by-doing” legacy very much alive. Michael Woo Dean, College of Environmental Design

On Teamwork and Leadership AECOM Following ten weeks of diligent work towards a shared design objective, the end result of the AECOM Cal Poly Urban Design studio exhibited a diversity of skills and unique perspectives from young professionals who represent the future capabilities necessary for an ever changing world. They each delivered a commendable level of intelligence, hard-work and passion with respect to the assignment. Challenges encountered beneﬁted the most when the teams understood how they complemented one another and enjoyed doing what they did. Successful teamwork respects each and every contribution and is able to challenge/motivate others around them. Success came to those teams and individuals who leveraged their curiosity and engaged topics outside of their areas of expertise, again demonstrating themselves as well-rounded, intellectually curious and interested.

has occurred between practicing and academic professionals and the City of San Bernardino leadership created a dynamic platform for this to occur in the studio. The students brought a fresh perspective and understanding to the challenges facing cities in transition and how communities in Southern California can reshape their destiny. The proposals exhibited an optimism for urban life; one that is more sustainable, socially responsible, ecologically sensitive, economically adaptable and reﬂective of our best aspirations as a society. AECOM and the profession at large thrives on dialogue such as the Cal Poly Pomona Learnby-Doing Philosophy, and as individuals from and representatives of AECOM we were all delighted to have been able to contribute to this Urban Design Studio’s success.

The most important thing you can do as a leader or mentor is to spend time with people — active Vaughan Davies listening and open dialogue with your teams and Jason Reynolds your staff are critical elements. People need new Gaurav Srivastava challenges, experiences and opportunities if they are going to grow, and that growth opportunity must be lead by example. The collaboration that

Interdisciplinary Studio Description Cal Poly Pomona College of Environmental Design + AECOM The San Bernardino Urban Design Studio was organized as an interdisciplinary endeavor between the Cal Poly Pomona College of Environmental Design and AECOM with the support of the staff of the City of San Bernardino. As a hybrid discipline that connects the allied disciplines of urban planning, landscape architecture and architecture, Urban Design strives to improve the built environment and the lives of communities through interventions at the policy, urban form, building design, landscape and at the ever more critical public realm design level. The subject area for this studio project, as suggested by the city, include the southern edge of downtown San Bernardino from Rialto south to the 10 Freeway; the 215 Freeway to the west and Waterman Ave. on the east. Within these borders are a the 66ers stadium, the Orange Show Fair Grounds, the Inland Center Mall, dispersed retail along E street, numerous housing types, numerous undeveloped lots, a substantial amount of freeway-oriented development along the 10 Freeway centered on Hospitality Lane and a signiﬁcant amount of water infrastructure including the Santa Ana River and existing channels.

Organized along Cal Poly Pomona’s Quarter System, this studio was a highly intensive tenweek charrette. These ten weeks were broken into a series of smaller charrette projects, which culminated in a major 5-week charrette. The results of these efforts are documented in the following pages.

Students began the studio process with a oneweek charrette, a period of intense site analysis and site documentation, from this the students were able to better understand the key patterns of housing and commercial development, open space systems, existing and proposed transit facilities, etc.

The studio was broadly organized into a series of research, master planning and urban design studio charrettes. These charrettes were subsidized with an intensive and multidisciplinary lecture series that was provided by AECOM staff, San Bernardino city staff and Cal Poly Pomona Urban and Regional Planning faculty. Where speciﬁc urban design research and design skills were investigated in the studio project , the lectures stressed the theoretical and actual underpinnings of this most complex discipline of Urban Design. This studio is grateful to AECOM in addition to certain Cal Poly Pomona faculty for providing an outstanding lecture series that included talks on economic development, transit oriented development, ecosystem services, and landscape design.

This was followed by a case study and research phase where urban design districts were developed as urban design case studies. This revealed to students numerous methods, forms and structures by which the basic elements of urban design are assembled into successful districts. The next exercise required that the interdisciplinary student team propose actual solutions to the problems they identified during the previous charrettes. The class was divided into five interdisciplinary teams, responsible for five distinct coterminous sub-areas. Their proposals were collated as proposed master plans for the respective areas to be subsequently developed as urban design proposals. This studio is not necessarily basing the urban design proposals on a long-term recessionary environment. This studio is very much planning

for the future, hopefully one that is more sustainable, socially responsible, ecologically sensitive, economically adaptable and reﬂective of our best aspirations as a society. Cal Poly Pomona has been able to engage this intensive educational opportunity, one that truly embodies the learn-by-doing philosophy of the University, through the kind generosity of the AECOM ﬁrm and the director of urban planning and design, Vaughan Davies. Beyond the material support, AECOM and Mr. Davies provided a great deal of intellectual support for this studio. The studio also recognizes the City of San Bernardino, Emil Marzullo, Interim Executive Director, San Bernardino Economic Development Agency, and most especially, Jeffrey Smith, Senior Urban Planner, San Bernardino Economic Development Agency, who was a constant and most welcome support to the faculty and the students.

SBUD 2012

Urban Design MASTER PLAN Areas San Bernardino Interdisciplinary Urban Design Studio

GTWYSB-Transit Oriented 2.0 and 66ers Stadium Unexpected Oasis-Inland Center Mall and E Street The Root- Orange Show River Central- Light Industrial and Golf Course (inter)bernardino- Hospitality Lane and channels

Student Project TEAM Introduction

Team Members

(inter) bernardino

Team Photo/Image Here

Alfonso Cota

Ioanna Magiati

Landscape Architecture, 4th year Connect

Architecture, Graduate Densify

Jason Jacquot

Adrian Magrina

Landscape Architecture, 4th year Digest

Presenter Architecture, Graduate DeďŹ ne

Hannah Kim

Jonathan Stalvey

Architecture, 4th year Educate

Presenter Landscape Architecture, 4th year Recreate

Ana Karen Loera Architecture, 4th year Clean

(inter) bernardino Statement In order to accomplish the new vision for San Bernardino our site needs to be connected, densiﬁed, deﬁned, digested, educated, cleaned and recreated. By incorporating these major themes we feel that San Bernardino can move to a more healthier and sustainable city. The Santa Ana River is an integral part to not just the Hospitality area, but to the entire San Bernardino region. The revitalization project along the rivers edge works towards celebrating neighborhoods, protecting wildlife, promoting health of the river and leveraging economic development. Through this design we hope to foster a growth in community awareness and pride in the Santa Ana River. Our vision for the Hospitality Lane is to increase occupancy level, by introducing higher density building typologies and mixuse development. Combining retail and commercial uses, along with residential and entertainment in a more dense environment, encourages a pedestrian friendly lifestyle,

increases the sense of security for the users and support a more sustainable way of life in San Bernardino. In response to the densification of hospitality lane the integration of bioswales (water collection and filtering systems), along with pedestrian walkways, define the edge that connects to the Santa Ana River. By doing so the city accomplishes our goal for a more healthier and sustainable San Bernardino. By utilizing and incorporating the unused spaces in San Bernardino, it will connect and recreate the city as whole. Then replenishment of the city will be merely a question of time.

PALM SPRINGS

SAN BERNARDINO MTN VIEW AVE

E ST

MAIN ST

2ND ST

2ND ST H ST

§ ¨¦

215

KING ST

F ST

KING ST

O RI A L T

RIALTO AVE

SIERRA WAY

IRWIN ST

E RD

STODDARD AVE

LIP

HILDA ST

ARROWHEAD AVE

I ST

RIALTO AVE

N SA

San Bernardino vs Palm Springs

BRYANT ST LUGO AVE

Supporting background research + process + case studies

BOYD ST

ALLEN ST

CLUSTER ST

E ST

VALLEY ST PERSHING AVE

VELARDE ST

MAYFIELD ST

25% building to 75% open space

BERKELEY AVE

DELTA LN

MTN VIEW AVE

G ST

WATERMAN AVE

D ST

REDICK AVE

ATHOL ST COLUMBIA ST

VALLEY ST

BIRCH ST T THY S DORO

BIRCH CT

SHAY ST

MARTIN ST

OAK ST

BERRY ST BROOKSIDE ST

OAK CT

MILL ST

HUFF ST

CRESCENT AVE

San Bernardino’s Points of Interest: Stadium Golf Fairplex

WALKINSHAW ST

JULIA ST

CONGRESS ST

LINCOLN AVE

H ST

G ST

I ST

HUFF ST

ESPERANZA ST

COLLEGE DR

WATERMAN AVE

IN LA

HAZEL AVE

N TE

ALLEN ST

LUGO AVE

DRAKE DR

NT ER

AL L

CENTRAL A

ARROWHEAD AVE

CENTRAL AVE

JEFFERSON ST

SIERRA WAY

AV E O N

HILLCREST ST

D R

N CE

ORANGE SHOW LN DR

SCENIC

VA LL

VI EW

N LA IN

NORMAN

ENNIS ST

75% buildings to 25% open space

RI VE RW AL

AMOS AVE

M O N

ORANGE SHOW RD

D R

DUMAS ST

CHANDLER AVE

CAMINO REAL

O W CASE DR

CENTURY AVE

C ENTURY DR

D ST

AUTO CENTER DR

AIRPO

RT DR

ENTER DR

SS C NE SI

SUNWEST CT

WATERMAN AVE

215

COMMERCENTER C

§ ¨¦

FAIRWAY DR

COMMERCENTER D

AUTO PLAZA DR

MACKAY DR

HOSPITALITY LN

Legend

DINERS CT

E ST

City Limits

§ ¨¦10

City of San Bernardino I 215 to Waterman Avenue Between I 10 and 2nd Street

STEEL R D

CLUB WAY

HU NTS LN

OS S

SUNWEST LN

Palm Springs’ Points of Interest: Golf Palm Springs Convention Center Entertainment Hotels Shopper’s paradise Casinos

KN O

LINCOLN AVE

RIM

WASHINGTON AVE

BENEDICT ST

Printing Date: 12/12/2011 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet Data Rights: Street, Parcel, City Limit and Aerial data owned by the County of San Bernardino. All other data owned by the City of San Bernardino. File: P:\GISData\MXDs\AreaMaps\215ToWatermanBetweenI10And2ndStAerialSts.mxd

25% building to 75% open space

REDLANDS BLVD 1 inch = 200 feet

100 200

400

600

800 Feet

75% buildings to 25% open spa

$75,000 - $99,999

$50,000 - $74,999

$35,000 - $49,999

$25,000 - $34,999

$15,000 - $24,999

<$15,000

Hispanic 31.6%

Hispanic 66.1%

4.4%

Two or more races

Two

0.3%

Two or more races

3.5%

Asian

0.4%

Pacific islander

0.2%

2.9%

Other race 38.4%

American Indian

Pacific islander

Other race 17.1%

1.1 %

Black 16.7%

Black 3.63%

American Indian

White 33.8%

White 73.2%

Home Price $308, 423 $200,000+

10%

$200,000+

20%

$150,000 - $199,999

Palm Springsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Demographics

$150,000 - $199,999

40%

$100,000 - $149,999

Home Price $146,000

$100,000 - $149,999

$75,000 - $99,999

$50,000 - $74,999

$35,000 - $49,999

$25,000 - $34,999

$15,000 - $24,999

<$15,000

Supporting background research + process + case studies

San Bernardino vs Palm Springs Analyis of Success of Palm Springs Country Club

San Bernardinoâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Demographics

HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME

40%

20%

10%

SAN BERNARDINO MTN VIEW AVE

E ST

MAIN ST

H ST

215

KING ST

F ST

KING ST

O RI A L T

RIALTO AVE

SIERRA WAY

IRWIN ST

E RD

STODDARD AVE

LIP

HILDA ST

ARROWHEAD AVE

I ST

RIALTO AVE

N SA

San Bernardino vs San Diego

2ND ST

§ ¨¦

SAN DIEGO BRYANT ST

LUGO AVE

Supporting background research + process + case studies

BOYD ST

ALLEN ST

CLUSTER ST

E ST

VALLEY ST PERSHING AVE

VELARDE ST

MAYFIELD ST

25% building to 75% open space

BERKELEY AVE

DELTA LN

MTN VIEW AVE

G ST

WATERMAN AVE

D ST

REDICK AVE

ATHOL ST COLUMBIA ST

VALLEY ST

BIRCH ST T THY S DORO

BIRCH CT

SHAY ST

MARTIN ST

OAK ST

BERRY ST BROOKSIDE ST

OAK CT

MILL ST

HUFF ST

CRESCENT AVE

San Bernardino’s Points of Interest: Stadium Golf Fairplex

WALKINSHAW ST

JULIA ST

CONGRESS ST

LINCOLN AVE

H ST

G ST

I ST

HUFF ST

ESPERANZA ST

COLLEGE DR

WATERMAN AVE

IN LA

HAZEL AVE

N TE

ALLEN ST

LUGO AVE

DRAKE DR

NT ER

AL L

CENTRAL A

ARROWHEAD AVE

CENTRAL AVE

JEFFERSON ST

SIERRA WAY

AV E O N

HILLCREST ST

N LA IN

VI EW

D R

N CE

ORANGE SHOW LN

SCENIC

EY VA LL

KN O

LINCOLN AVE

RIM

WASHINGTON AVE

BENEDICT ST

NORMAN

ENNIS ST

AMOS AVE

RI VE RW AL

D R

80% building to 20% open

DUMAS ST

CHANDLER AVE

CAMINO REAL

O W CASE DR

CENTURY AVE

C ENTURY DR

D ST

AUTO CENTER DR

AIRPO

RT DR

ENTER DR

SS C NE SI

SUNWEST CT

WATERMAN AVE

215

COMMERCENTER C

§ ¨¦

FAIRWAY DR

COMMERCENTER D

AUTO PLAZA DR

MACKAY DR

HOSPITALITY LN

Legend

DINERS CT

E ST

City Limits

§ ¨¦10

City of San Bernardino I 215 to Waterman Avenue Between I 10 and 2nd Street

STEEL R D

CLUB WAY

HU NTS LN

OS S

SUNWEST LN

San Diego’s Points of Interest: Qualcomm Stadium Curving Bay Balboa Park Sea World San Diego Zoo Gaslamp Quarter

M O N

ORANGE SHOW RD

25% building to 75% open space

REDLANDS BLVD 1 inch = 200 feet

100 200

400

600

800 Feet

80% building to 20% open space

1.7%

1.8%

Hispanic 38.1%

Two or more races

Asian 29.6%

Pacific islander

Other race 20.7%

0.6%

Black 27.1%

White 20.3%

$200,000+

$150,000 - $199,999

40%

20%

GASLAMP

3.5%

4.4%

Asian

Two or more races

Hispanic 66.1%

0.2%

Pacific islander

Other race 38.4%

2.9%

Black 16.7%

White 33.8%

$200,000+

$150,000 - $199,999

$100,000 - $149,999

$75,000 - $99,999

$50,000 - $74,999

$35,000 - $49,999

$25,000 - $34,999

San Bernardino vs San Diego

CONFERENCE CENTER

PETCO PARK E STREET

<$15,000

$15,000 - $24,999

American Indian

Home Price $146,000

American Indian

Home Price $362,500 $100,000 - $149,999

$75,000 - $99,999

$50,000 - $74,999

$35,000 - $49,999

$25,000 - $34,999

$15,000 - $24,999

<$15,000

Supporting background research + process + case studies Establishing a Parallel between San Diego and San Bernardino

San Bernardino’s Demographics HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME

40%

20%

10%

E STREET QUARTER

HORTON PLAZA BASEBALL

San Diego’s Demographics

10%

MALL FAIRGROUNDS

Supporting background research + process + case studies Success of Petco Park in San Diego

Success of Convention Center in San Diego

Process for (inter) bernardino

Densify the infrastructure and the population “within ”our site.

Connect “between” the other sites.

vision

Densify

Connect

master plan

vision

Define

inter

Recreate

bernardino Digest

Clean

Educate

conceptual cost benefit analysis

Recreate

Define the relationship “between” urban and the river.

inter bernardino a Latin prefix meaning "between", "within a group", “among”.

“within” an ecology among the infrastructure.

Digest “among” the urban environment and the river.

Clean “among” the industry of san bernardino using solar energy.

Educate “among” the community and the general public.

Overview of (inter) bernardino

re Socioeconomic groups

General Information big picture Rialto

215

Highland

San Bernardino

Santa Ana River

Colton

Mentone 10

Existing Trail

Loma Linda

Redlands

Grand Terrace

San Bernardino is

Los Angeles and Palm Springs

San Bernardino is

between

between major freeways(215, 10) and

among the Santa Ana river

Different methods of transportation

Diverse Incomes

(inter) bernardino Master Plan

Group 1 location

MTN VIEW AVE

E ST

Existing figure ground 2ND ST

2ND ST H ST

§ ¨¦

Channel connectivity

BRYANT ST LUGO AVE

MAIN ST

215

KING ST

F ST

KING ST

RI A LT O

RIALTO AVE

IRWIN ST

SIERRA WAY

ARROWHEAD AVE

STODDARD AVE

IPE FEL

HILDA ST

SAN

I ST

RIALTO AVE

REDICK AVE

D ST

ATHOL ST

MAYFIELD ST

PERSHING AVE

WATERMAN AVE

CLUSTER ST

VALLEY ST

SITE 1

BIRCH ST D ORO

BERKELEY AVE

MTN VIEW AVE

VALLEY ST

E ST

G ST

VELARDE ST

BOYD ST

SAN BERNARDINO TODAY

COLUMBIA ST

DELTA LN

ALLEN ST

WALKINSHAW ST

JULIA ST

CONGRESS ST

SHAY ST

ST THY

BIRCH CT

MARTIN ST

OAK ST

BERRY ST BROOKSIDE ST

OAK CT

HUFF ST

CRESCENT AVE

MILL ST

LINCOLN AVE

H ST

G ST

I ST

HUFF ST

ESPERANZA ST

COLLEGE DR

SITE 4

ALLEN ST

DRAKE DR

SITE 2

ELL ST

WATERMAN AVE

IN LA

LUGO AVE

HAZEL AVE

CEN TER

ALL

CENTRAL AVE

ARROWHEAD AVE

INL AN D

JEFFERSON ST

SI ERRA WAY

E AV ON

HILLCREST ST

SITE 3

RIM

WASHINGTON AVE

BENEDICT ST

NT CE

LINCOLN AVE

ND LA IN

VIE

ORANGE SHOW LN

SCENIC

VA LLE

KN OL

NORMAN RD

M O NI CA

AV E

ENNIS ST

AMOS AVE

R IVE RW AL

ORANGE SHOW RD

DUM AS ST

CHANDLER AVE

CAMINO REAL

SH O

W CASE DR

CENTURY AVE

CENTURY DR

D ST

AUTO CENTER DR

DR S

AIRPORT

ENTER DR SS C NE SI

WATERMAN AVE

SUNWEST CT

215

COMMERCENTER C

§ ¨¦

COMMERCENTER D

AUTO PLA ZA DR

MACKAY DR

FAIRWAY DR

HOSPITALITY LN

Legend

DINERS CT

SUNWEST LN E ST

City Limits

LUB WAY

C STEEL RD

HUN T

§ ¨¦10

S LN

OS S

REDLANDS BLVD

Zoning Maps

Existing Plan

Master Plan with Themes

Proposed Plan

Legend

CLEAN

EDUCATE

COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE (RESIDENTIAL + COMMERCIAL) EDUCATION PARKS

DEFINE

LIGHT INDUSTRY HOSPITALITY FACILITY

CONNECT

OFFICES

DENSIFY RECREATE

DIGEST

Big Idea

3 Main Strategies

strategy

Water Systems health & wellness bioswales river edge condition education digestive systems graywater natural habitat

transition between dense urban areas to open space along the river

strategy

densify sustainable systems street realigment clean tech buildings typology infrastructure

1+2+3

Pedestrian Friendly

Redevelopment

bike paths pedestrian trail bridges sidewalks parks

Inter bernardino

connect densify define digest educate clean recreate

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Connect Alfonso Cota Landscape Architecture 4th year Connect

Goal: Connect San Bernardino through a set of intermodal connections Strategies: t Embrace the Santa Ana River Trail t

Establish an Urban Intermodal System

Implementation of an Urban Flow Trail

Embrace the Santa Ana River Trail Take advantage of the already succesful Santa Ana river trail and connect it to the rest of San Bernardino through its water ways. Establish an Urban intermodal System By establishing an intermodal network it will provide San Bernardino with the necessary infrastructure in order to shift into a more healthy and sustainable lifestyle. Implementation of an Urban Flow Trail An urban ďŹ&#x201A;ow trail is a mountain bike trail system within an urban context, challenging for all skill level riders. It will connect San Bernardino mountains to the Santa Ana river, transecting the urban San Bernardino Form.

Embrace the Santa Ana River Trail The idea behind extending the Santa Ana River Trail was to take advantage of the already successful existing Infrastructure and continue to extend the concept through the rest of San Bernardino Waterways. In the image above we can observe a plausible scenario for the Santa Ana River Trail, where that would intersect through the Santa Ana River Center as well as through other area of our projects.

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Connect

Embrace the Santa Ana River Trail

Establish an Urban intermodal System

By extending the trail it will help to connect and provide an alternative form of transportation for the inhabitants and visitors alike. Connecting local residents to the OfďŹ ce Spaces that would be provided along Hospitality lane. Also holding the potential of hosting potential bicycle racing.

An Urban Intermodal System will be provided as a network of different use trails that will serve as a connection to different key sites. It will help cater to the Healthy lifestyle we are promoting in our project. It would promote exercise as well as serve as a habitat corridors, along with the Urban Flow Trails.

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Connect

Implementation of an Urban Flow Trail

The Urban Flow Trail would provide a connection between the natural and built environment. Using the inner portion of the waterways to connect a different portions of the sites. The idea behind the Urban Flow trail was based off of IMBAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s (International Mountain Bike Association) efforts to make mountain biking available to everybody.

The Urban Flow Trail has the potential of extending out to the foothills providing an experience from the Mountains to the River. Crossing through a different set of experiences along the way.

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

Densify Ioanna Magiati Individual Photo Here

Architecture, 3rd year Grad. Densify

Strategy 1: Setback of River’s Edge. The river’s edge has a setback of 400 ft to limit the amount of unused land and densify the new development.

Existing Condition: Sprawl Overparked due to current zoning No continuity in Hospitality Lane Low density ; 80% open space

Goal: Uniﬁed Urban Plan

Strategy 2: Realignment of Right of Ways.

Strategies: River’s Edge Setaback Realignment of Right of Ways Density Growth

The elimination of curb cuts allow for trafﬁc to ﬂow more freely while secondary roads act as rear parking and back of house functions.

400 ft setback

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

Densify Strategy 3: Density growth

Dense Area_Birdâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Eye View

Eliminates the suburban sprawl and uniďŹ es the urban plan by adding multiple building typologies while focusing them along the realigned arteries.

5rth Level 4rth Level 3rd Level 2nd Level Ground Level

SECTIONAL DIAGRAM_VERTICAL DEVELOPMENT

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

DeďŹ ne Adrian Magrina Architecture, 3rd year Grad. Densify

Strategy 1: Building Typology The mix of hospitality, commercial and mixed use draws in users in which deďŹ ne the new San Bernardino.

Mixed Use

2-3 levels

(commercial + residential)

centralized for easy access Goal: Create a Pedestrian Friendly Environment Strategies: Bioswale Connectivity Pedestrian Right of ways Building Typology

Commercial

1 level

major corridors Restaurants

1 level

scattered

throughout to take advantage of various clientele

Hotels

4 levels

positioned to take

advantage of views Offices positioned in

denser regions

4-5 levels

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Strategy 2: Bioswale Connectivity Incorporating native landscaping reducing water consumption and maintenance while waterloving vegetation assist in the cleansing of the graywater collected from buildings and surface run off.

Where does water come from? Large volumes of excess rain water coming from urban areas BeneďŹ ts: Filtering pollutants Retention and inďŹ ltration Reduce thermal pollutions It can be attractive landscaping feature

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Strategy 2: Bioswale Connectivity

Bioswale Connectivity Digestive systems porous paving system storage and filtration of graywater

native landscaping better landscape integration easier maintaince lower water consumption

bioswales collect graywater from buildings and surfaces collect run off water

waterloving vegetation assist in cleansing runoff

Building graywater Bioswales Run off water collection

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

Strategy 2: Bioswale Connectivity

5’-0”

15’-0”’ ”

Goal: bioswale connectivity to the digestive system

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

Densify

Hospitality Ln Hospitality Lane

Street Typology Street Typology

15' - 0"

5' - 0"

30' - 0"

10' - 0"

30' - 0"

5' - 0"

15' - 0"

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Digest

The Santa Ana River Revitilization Jason Jacquot Landscape Architecture, 4th year Digest

Existing Conditions: Concrete Channell Lack of Connection on to Hospitality No Natural Habitat tat to Support Wildlife No Ecological Function nction

Goal: “Digesting San Bernardino’s Water” Strategies: Bioswale Connectivity tivity - Rain/Grey Water Collection Constructed Wetlands - Enhance Water Quality - Improve Water Resources Public Access - Recreation Space - Open Space - New Trails - Improve Natural Habitat Flood Control Foster Awareness and Pride in the Santa Ana River

The Revitalization planning process will look at improvements along the project area all aimed towards celebrating neighborhoods, protecting wildlife, promoting the health of the river, and leveraging economic development. By improving the enviornment, enhancing the water quality, improving water resources, and improving the ecological functioning of the River the city of San Bernardino will have a much brighter future. By the end of the planning process, a 20-year blueprint for development and management of the Santa Ana River will be developed for implementation.

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Digest Strategy 1: Bioswale Connectivity

Strategy 2: Wetland Digestion

The ďŹ rst step on the collection of rain and grey water runoff. Bioswales can remove and immobilize or break down a large portion of pollutants found in runoff. These swales are the main contributor to the feeding of the wetlands and work as a collector of otherwise wasted water that can become cleansed and re-used throughout the San Bernardino region.

The constructed wetlands are complex, integrated systems in which water, plants, animals, microorganisms and the enviornment - sun, soil, air - interact to improve water quality. Three different pools process water back into the larger open system to the West end of the site.

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Digest Strategy 3: Public Access Providing signiďŹ cant recreation space and open space, new trails, and improve natural habitats to support wildlife. Fostering a growth in community awareness of the Santa Ana River, and pride in the Santa Ana River.

Field of WildďŹ&#x201A;owers Wetland Pants Shade and Accent Trees

Section A

Section B

Urban Runoff Catchment

I ndividual SStudent tudent PProject roject (i(inter) nter) bebernardino rnardino Individual Educate

I ndividual S tudent P roject ( inter) bernardino Utilizing Existing Natural Habitat

Hannah Kim Architecture, 4th year Educate

Existing Condition: No existing river center No connection to the E Street Existing Santa Ana River with plants and animals

Goal: Creating a connection and education center

Santa Ana Riverâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s existing natural habitat creates suitable environment for River Center to be placed in San Bernardino.

RIVER CENTER EXISTING HABITAT

NATURAL HABITAT

Education Center for All The River Center will serve as a education and research center for all ages about the bioswale and the existing natural habitat.

Strategies: Utilizing existing natural habitat Create education center for all Serve as a bridge+connector

It will also: 1. Supports studies related to the environment, bioswales around the region. 2. Provide research opportunities for undergraduate and graduate students.

GOLF COURSE

Bridge + Connector The River Center is located at the point where Clean Tech, Hospitality, and the golf course meets. It will serve as bridge and connection point of all.

RIVER CENTER PARKING TRAIL

ACCESSIBILITY DIAGRAM

I ndividual SStudent tudent PProject roject (i(inter) nter) bebernardino rnardino Individual

I ndividual S tudent P roject ( inter) bernardino Space between the interior wall and facade effectively blocks the South sun from overheating the interior space from the large glass facade. In between the facade and wall, it provides pedestrian walkway allowing gentle amount of sun from the translucent facade.

Cross Section

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

VIEW FROM THE GOLF COURSE

VIEW FROM THE HOSPITALITY

EDUCATION CENTER FOR ALL AGES

GOLF COURSE E STREET

HOSPITALITY

BRIDGE + CONNECTOR CREATING A CONNECTION PROMOTING WELL-BEING LIFESTYLE UTILIZING EXISTING NATURAL HABITAT

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Clean

Proposed Condition

Individual Photo Here

Ana Karen Loera

Solar Farm

Architecture, 4th year Clean

Green Open Spaces Solar-Green Parking Lots

Existing Conditions: Sprawl E-street is not pedestrian friendly No continuity on E-street Overparked due to current zoning

Green Buffers

Goal: â&#x20AC;&#x153;Clean San Bernardinoâ&#x20AC;?

Parking Structures

Strategies: Parking lots (grassturf) Industry (clean tech) Solar energy (solar farm) E-street (pedestrian friendly)

Industrial Area

Existing Condition

Clean Tech Institute

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Clean Strategy 1: Solar-Green Parking Lots Strategy 3: Solar Energy Farms Use clean energy to generate electricity. Parking lots become more than just storage areas, and turn into useable green areas.

A process to turn unused and underused land into electrical production. PAYBACK Size Rebates Tax Credits Cost/W IniƟal Cost

Column1 27199.23 kW $0 $59,996,831.97 $7.35 $199,989,440

AŌer IncenƟves

$139,992,608

Payback Electric Rate Buy back rate

27 years $0.13/kWh 0.06

*source: solar farm_national renewable energy laboratory (NREL) SYSTEM Month January February March April May June July August September October Novemeber December

Annual

OUTPUT Solar RadiaƟon (kWh/m2/day) 4.78 5.23 5.8 6.3 6.59 7.1 7.05 7.19 6.64 5.77 5.18 4.61 6.02

Column2 Output (kWh) 2670640 2216816 3330329 3886474 3827003 3682001 3937943 3980408 3886170 3490075 3166139 2701161 40775159

Column3 Value ($) 340708.66 282811.76 424868.92 495819.49 488232.43 469733.71 502385.68 507803.18 495780.7 445248.62 403922.27 344602.4

$5,201,917.82

Strategy 2: Clean Tech Institute Teach industries to improve operational performance, productivity and efﬁciency while reducing costs, inputs, energy consumption, waste and/or pollution. Greatly reduce or eliminate negative ecological impacts, improving the productive and responsible use of natural resources.

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Clean Strategy 4: E-street

Proposed E-Street

INDUSTRIAL

BUFFER

SIDEWALK

DOUBLE ROW OF TREES

PARKING LANE

BIKE PATH

PARKING LANE

DOUBLE ROW OF TREES

SIDEWALK

COMMERCIAL

Pedestrian friendly, double row of trees, continuous transparent storefronts, parallel parking, bicycle lanes, green plazas to relieve industrial areas. Parking structures treated as back of residence with adjacent open spaces.

Light Colored reflective pavement

15' - 0" 100%

8' - 0" 0' - 6" 1' 0"

18' - 0"

4' - 6" 0' - 6"

0' - 6"

0' - 6" 18' - 0"

8' - 0" 4' - 6"

15' - 0" 1' - 0" 0' 6"

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

Recreate Jonathan Stalvey Presenter Landscape architecture 4th year Recreate

Goal: Recreate between the relationships and the conﬂence Strategies t

Introduce a Peformative Value

Redeﬁne a Park’s Purpose

Embrace the relationship between Infrastructure and Recreation

Introduce a Performative Value

Strategy 1: Introduce a Performative Value

The site will be home to multi-use and multipurpose performing open space that is poised to change engagement and use over time. The possibility for different uses is as diverse as San Bernardino and their future growth.

The site will be home to multi-use and multi-purpose performing open space that is poised to change engagement and use over time. The possibility for different uses is as diverse as San Bernardino and their future growth.

Redeﬁne a Park’s Purpose The traditional use of a park has been re-created based on the relationships found at the conﬂuence of the Santa Ana River and the freeway interchange. The park has been re-envisioned to allow for more uses and a more engaging environment.

Embrace the Relationship Between Infrastructure and Recreation The combination of the ﬁrst two strategies are woven together to create a unique experience where infrastructure and recreation coexist. Combination of building materials, vegetation, and purpose play an integral role in this relationship.

Annual Flooding

Agricultural Use

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

Recreate Strategy 2: Redeﬁne a Park’s Purpose The traditional use of a park has been re-created based on the relationships found at the conﬂuence of the Santa AnaRiver and the freeway interchange. The park has been re-envisioned to allow for more uses and a more engaging environment.

Dry Season

Wet Season

t t t t t

Mountiain Biking Interior Trails Picnicking Climbing And more...

Wetland Research Picnicking Climbing Fishing And More...

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino Recreate Embrace the Relationship Between Infrastructure and Recreation The combination of the ďŹ rst two strategies are woven together to create a unique experience where infrastructure and recreation coexist. Combination of building materials, vegetation, and purpose play an integral role in this relationship.

Individual Student Project (inter) bernardino

Recreate

BEFORE

AFTER

Birdâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Eye Sketch

proposed (inter)bernardino

connect densify define digest clean educate recreate

Birdâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Eye Rendering

Existing vs.Proposed SAN BERNARDINO TODAY

Phasing 5 YEAR PLAN

Walkability

20 YEAR PLAN

Existing

50 YEAR PLAN

2 2 1 1 2 3

1 2 3

2 2

1 1

22 2

2 2 1 1 2 3

6 3

1 2 3

2 2

3 1

1 1 1 2

1 1

2 3

5 5

3 2 12

3 2

3 3

3 5

2 5

2 4

1 23

4 3

2 3

5 5

3 5

Building Footprint

Open Space SAN BERNARDINO IN 50 YEARS

Walk Score:

Implement the Water

44/100

Treatment System

Estimated Proposed

Connection to other sites and cities through water.

Densify area and Redevelop.

on thestreets. SCHEDULE:

2 2

5 YEAR PLAN

20 YEAR PLAN

50 YEAR PLAN

1 1

2 3

CONNECT

2 2

3 1

RECREATE

1 1

22 2

6 4

CLEAN

6 3

3 2 12

3 2

2 3

3 3

3 1

2 5

4 2 2

2 2

4 4

2 1

DENSIFY

1 23

4 3

4 2 2

3 2

2 3

DIGEST Building Footprint Open Space

Walk Score:

85/100

EDUCATE

22 33

inter bernardino

DEFINE

40% 60%

19% 81%

3 1

4 2

2 2

3 1

2 1

Conceptual Cost- Benefit Analysis DIGEST_WATER

RECREATE_PERFORM

*source: NREL

*source: EPA.gov

40775159 kWh per year: $5, 201, 917.82 revenue

390,000 gallons per year in 100 apartments

5.15 acres Annual Savings: $322,000 Food and vegetables for 300 students at Orange Elementary School

CLEAN_ENERGY

DEFINE_EDGE

DENSIFY_AREA

7 hotels: average 300 rooms

2x the densit =2x the population =2x the use of water = abundant recycled water

rooms/hotel: 2100 rooms

EDUCATE_PUBLIC 2 buses per week =80 buses per year =4000 children per year

CONNECT_CHANNELS 10 m m Foothills to Santa Ana River Average person mountain biking: burns 1200 calories in 10 miles

COST/SQ FT $59 $170 $105 $175 $179 $40 $151 TOTAL

EXISTING

of grey water per day for

250 sq.ft of building space.

TOTAL $44,595,445 $154,068,620 $172,097,835 $140,375,550 $288,385,647 $40,954,920 $18,920,149 $859,398,166

Source: hƩp://evstudio.info/cost per square foot

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF INFRASTRUCTURE:

236,500 sq. ft. processing 537,000 gallons

Grey water

Estimated Project Cost INFRASTRUCTURE COST BUILDING TYPE SQ FT PARKING STRUCTURE 755855 APARTMENTS 906286 COMMERCIAL 1639027 HOTELS 802146 OFFICE 1611093 INDUSTRIAL 1023873 INSTITUTIONAL 125299

Tabulation Conclusion

860 MILLION DOLLARS

INTERbernardino

7500 spots

11000 spots

none

100 apartments

65 stores

80 stores

11 restaurants

25 restaurants

4 hotels

7 hotels

27 buildings

20 buildings

2 buildings

8 buildings

0 buildings

2 buildings

Water Run- Off EPA.gov: WATER SENSE LABEL

Water savings per year for 100

Water saved: Energy saved:

apartments:

About… 390,000 gallons 100,000 cu.ft.of natural gas

That's Like.... 4 households’ annual water usage Heating a house for 1 year

SBUD 2012

Team Conclusions We would like to take this opportunity to thank AECOM and the city of San Bernardino to allow us to work on this project. Thank you for AECOM for funding this studio and to the faculty who have done the massive amount of coordination throughout the quarter. Thanks to this studio we as a group feel like we have learned skills in which will further help in our future careers. -(inter) bernardino team