

Funding & property tax incentives
• Record amount of funding for affordable housing programs – SHIP and SAIL fully funded
• Missing middle property tax exemption - (s. 196.1978(3)
• Nonprofit land exemption for affordable housing - s. 196.1978(1)(b)
• Local option property tax exemption - s. 196.1979
Land use tools
• Mandate for AH in commercial, industrial, and mixed-use zones (ss. 125.01055(7)/166.04151(7)
• Optional land use tool (ss. 125.01055(6)/166.04151(6)
Publicly owned land
• Identifying public land “appropriate” for affordable housing (ss. 125.379/166.0451)
• Using public land for permanently/long-term public good
Other innovative housing solutions
• Zoning reforms to allow more homes by-right
• Local incentive programs
• Guided growth
• Innovative building techniques
Mandate contains certain use, density, height, floor area ratio, administrative approval, parking, and other standards for affordable housing developments if a proposed development meets the following criteria:
• Multifamily or mixed-use residential in any area zoned for commercial, industrial, or mixed use
• At least 40% of units are affordable rentals for households up to 120% AMI for at least 30 years
• If mixed-use, at least 65% of the total square footage must be residential
Local government cannot require a development authorized under this preemption to obtain a zoning/land use change, special exception, conditional use approval, variance, or comp plan amendment for use, density, floor area ratio, or height.
Use
• Multifamily or mixed-use areas zoned for commercial, industrial, or mixed-use without zoning or land use change
Density
Height
• Highest currently allowed density on any land in City or County where residential development is allowed
• Highest currently allowed height for a commercial or residential development within 1 mile of the proposed development or 3 stories, whichever is higher
• Exception – if proposal is on two or more sides adjacent to SF zoned property within SF home development w/ at least 25 contiguous SF homes, local gov’t. may limit height to the highest of the following:
•150% of tallest building adjacent to development
•Highest currently allowed height for the property based on LDRs
•3 stories
Floor Area
Ratio
Parking
• 150% of the highest currently allowed floor area ratio in the jurisdiction where development is allowed under the jurisdiction’s LDRs
Admin.
Approval
• Reduction of at least 20% if proposal is 1) within ½ mile of a “major transportation hub”; and 2) has available parking within 600 feet
• Elimination of parking requirements if proposal within an area recognized by the jurisdiction as a transit-oriented development or area
• LG must “consider” reducing parking if project within ¼ mile of a transit stop as defined by the local code
• Proposal must be administratively approved if proposal satisfies the LDRs and is otherwise consistent with the comp plan excepting density, floor area ratio, height, and use.
• Local govt must post expectations for admin approval on its website.
• If proposal also qualifies for a local entitlement bonus, bonus must be provided administratively.
• Parcels within a certain proximity to an airport runway.
• Admin approval not allowed for parcels within ¼ mile of a military installation as defined in in s. 163.3175(2).
Was Live Local a one-time thing?
Or did it mark a new era in how the state legislature approaches housing policy?
of the affordable
bills filed as of 2/25/25
HB 923: Housing (Lopez, V.)*
HB 943: Real Property and Land Use and Development (Lopez, V.)*
SB 184/HB 247: Affordable Housing (Gaetz/Conerly)
HB 701: Local Housing Assistance Plans (Stark)
HB 411/SB 488: Affordable Property Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for Leased Land
HB 365/SB 382: Rent of Affordable Housing Dwelling Units
HB 401/SB 634: Residential Land Use Regulations
HB 579: Development Permits and Orders
HB 393/SB 592: My Safe Florida Condominium Pilot Program
HB 853: Home Hardening
SB 948: Real Property and Condominium Flood Disclosures
SB 140/HB 123: Education
• Widely expected to be this session’s vehicle for tax policies related to affordable housing
• Amends several existing affordable housing property tax exemptions at s. 196.1978
• Extends the affordable housing property tax exemption for property owned by nonprofits to also include property owned by governmental entities
• Extends the nonprofit land exemption passed in Live Local to include property owned by governmental entities
• Amends the “Multifamily Middle Market” Property Tax exemption from the Live Local Act
• Expands eligibility from multifamily developments with 71+ affordable units to multifamily projects with only at least 1 affordable unit
• Creates new pre-approval process
• Makes it more difficult for taxing authorities to opt out of the 80-120% AMI exemption
• Amends the local option property tax exemption at s. 196.1979
• Expands the use of the infrastructure surtax for affordable housing purposes
• Widely expected to be this session’s vehicle for land use polices related to affordable housing
• Yes-in-God’s-Backyard (YIGBY) Reforms – requiring local governments to allow religious institutions to build affordable housing on their land without needing a zoning/land use change
• Lots of amendments to the LLA land use mandate for AH in commercial, industrial, and mixed-use areas, including:
• Newly defines “commercial use,” “industrial use,” “planned unit development”, “areas zoned for mixed use”
• Expands application to any sites owned by a city or county, a district school board, religious institution as defined in s. 170.201(2), any planned unit development with commercial, industrial, and mixed-use allowances, and any zoning district not zoned solely for use as a single-family home or duplex.
• Prevents local governments from directly or indirectly limiting the density, height, FAR, maximum lot size allowed by statute
• More amendments to the LLA land use mandate:
• Newly prevents local governments from directly or indirectly restricting the maximum lot size of a proposal below the max lot size allowed in the jurisdiction where MF and MU is allowed
• Requires local governments to reduce parking by at least 20% for LLA projects or 100% for structures that are 20,000 sq feet or less
• Requires local governments to post on its website a zoning map and zoning regulations in effect on 7/1/23
• Requires annual reporting to the state about the LLA land use tool
• Establishes a cause of action for property owners to sue local governments for violating the terms in the statute and requires expedited review
• Prohibits building moratoriums that impact affordable housing development
• Legalizes ADUs in all areas zoned for single-family housing, adds reporting requirements for ADUs, and ensures that homestead status is not lost if a homeowner rents an ADU
• Amends the FL Fair Housing Act to prohibit local governments from discriminating against affordable housing developments when making land use and permitting decisions – also waives sovereign immunity for cities and counties under this provision.
• Reduces impact fees by 20% for affordable housing developments authorized pursuant to s. 125.01055 or s. 166.04151.
• Prevents optional elements in a local government’s comprehensive plan from restricting the density or intensity established in the jurisdiction’s future land use element.
• Deems all residential land use categories to be compatible with each other in the Community Planning Act.
• Provides that any increase in height or FAR must be approved only by a simple majority vote of the city or county commission (not a supermajority vote).
• Creates an expedited foreclosure proceeding for abandoned real property.
• Requires school districts to use surplus land for affordable housing.
What is going to be Florida’s balance between state housing mandates and local action?
Source: Mercatus Center - Laying Foundations: Momentum Continues for Housing Supply Reforms in 2024