INDICATOR SCORE (INTENSITY SCALE) Sustainable Plantation Forest Management
1. Introduction LEI-04 Technical Document identifies the score (intensity scale) of every indicator of the Sustainable Plant Forest Management (PHTL) certification in LEI Standard 5000-2. The intensity scale guides Expert Panel II during the performance evaluation and decision making process of PHTL certification.
2. Scope This document explicates the definition and scores (intensity scale) of every PHTL certification assessment on production, ecology and social aspects.
3. Reference a) LEI Standard 5000, Sustainable Production Forest Management (PHPL) System Frame b) LEI Standard 5000-2, Sustainable Plant Forest Management System.
4. Indicator Intensity Scale in Sustainable Plantation Forest Management (PHTL) Certification Assessment 4.1 Production Aspect
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
Very Good
EXPLANATION
The assurance of the status of the management unit area meets all legal aspects; result of forest area recognition and
P1.1
The suitability of a management unit area with land
Land assurance as
utilization procedure (Forest-Use Procedure/TGH,
border management is acknowledged by related government organizations, various sectors; and the guidepost condition
planted forest area.
Provincial Area-Use Plan/RTRWP, Present Land-
meets the requirements.
Use/PLU) from the beginning until the minimum length of usage time will provide assurance to the area used.
Good
The assurance of the status of the management unit area meets all legal aspects; result of forest land recognition and
To give further judicial assurance on land-use and
border management is acknowledged by other users and related government organizations; but the condition of the
reduce future land-use conflicts, every change in
guideposts has not meet the requirements.
forest function caused by changes in land-use procedure must be reappointed as soon as possible.
Average
The assurance of the status of the management unit area meets all legal aspects, but the community or the government only acknowledges the result of recognition and forestland border management.
Guideposts are a form of sign/indication informing that the area within the boundary is bound to certain rights and function.
Bad
The assurance of the status of the management unit area meets all legal aspects, but the forestland recognition process and guidepost management are not finished yet.
Very Bad
The assurance of the status of the management unit area does not meet all legal aspects.
P1.2
Forest fire is an alarming factor, which have a great
Forest fire
deal of influence on resources as a whole.
management system.
Considering its effects beyond the boundaries and its unexpectedness, it requires exceptional preparation of
Good
system, trained staff; and an adequate Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for preventive and suppressive activities towards risks of fire. Average Obtain an organization that involves the community/related government organizations, tools including an early warning
management in its prevention to gain forest
system, trained staff; but no Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for preventive and suppressive activities towards risks
conservation. It can be represented within organizations, individuals, infrastructures and utilities
Obtain an organization that involves the community/related government organizations, tools including an early warning
Bad
of fire.
that are equivalent to the risk of fire incident. Obtain an organization that involves the community/related government organizations, tools including an early warning Very Bad
system, trained staff; but an inadequate Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for preventive and suppressive activities towards risks of fire. Has not obtain an organization that involves the community/related government organizations, tools including an early warning system, trained staff; and a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for preventive and suppressive activities towards risks of fire.
P1.3
Main plant selection, action (system and technique) of
Main plant selection,
silviculture in management plan level, and its
silviculture system
implementation based on considerations that
and techniques.
corresponds with corporate goal, land support
Very Good
Selection of main plant types and silviculture that suits the land support capability, local ecosystem and the social condition of the community.
Good
Selection of main plant types and silviculture determined and implemented according to the existing regulation.
capabilities, ecosystem and surrounding social condition, will provide an accomplishment of
Average
Bad INDICATOR
DEFINITION
Selection of main plant types and the selected of silviculture actions is unsuitably implemented according to the land support capability, local ecosystem and social condition of the community.
management unit in managing its resources.
SCORE
No effort in selecting and implementing main plant type and silviculture. EXPLANATION
P1.4
Forests are not only useful for its wood; thus, there are
Non-timber forest
efforts in optimizing other form of use, as service or
product utilization
product. The planted forest being developed will
improvement.
benefit the community. The existence and potential of non-timber forest products will provide opportunities
Good Average Bad
Developed non-timber forest product potential and obtain a sustainable management. Developed an effort in non-timber forest product potential development, but not able to utilize it sustainably. No effort in developing non-timber forest product.
and guarantees to the planted forest itself. Very Good
Measurement of growth and its increment, which then followed by repeated inventory at a certain period has been
P1.5
Permanent Sample Plots (PUP) is used as field
Stumpage growth and
laboratory or as growth increment monitoring media to
satisfactorily accomplished according to the existing scientific standards; and has been utilized in setting the
monitoring
create volume table, silviculture treatment testing, and
management plan, other types of utilization and its revision.
implementation and
other research and development activities for
results.
sustainable production forest. The level of significance
Good
Measurement of growth and its increment, which then followed by repeated inventory at a certain period has been
in long-term forest production estimation is determined
satisfactorily accomplished according to the existing scientific standards; but and has not been utilized in setting the
by sampling procedure and intensity in the repeated
management plan, other types of utilization and its revision.
inventory listing. Repeated inventory is needed to fix predetermined planning, which can be performed
Average
Measurement of growth and its increment, which then followed by repeated inventory at a certain period has been
every three to ten years depending on the maturity
accomplished but not according to the existing scientific standards; and has been utilized in setting the management
cycle, total managed area, and disruption and failure
plan, other types of utilization and its revision.
occurred. Bad
Measurement of growth and its increment implemented using repeated inventory has been accomplished but not according to the existing scientific standards; and has not been utilized in setting the management plan, other types of utilization and its revision.
Very Bad Measurement of growth and its increment has not been implemented.
P1.6
The annual production allotment is measured up with
Annual production
the maximum land capability to produce biomass per
according to forest
size or time unit, and its replanting capability. Forest
productivity, planting
product (timber) will sustain if the maximum output
capability, and land
equals to the determined production allotment. Then,
support.
the time-based timber forest product harvesting routine will simplify the sustainability arrangement for
Very Good
The annual forest production is completed according to the product arrangement plan that has been set according to a sound data that suits the replanting ability.
Good
The annual forest production is completed according to the product arrangement plan that has been set but not according to a sound data that suits the replanting ability.
Average
The annual forest production shows to be lower than the forest capability, but consistent with its replanting capability.
the next cycle. The annual forest production results are not as planned and expected that a low-production have occurred and its Bad
replanting capability is low. There is no forest result arrangement and its production is always higher than its replanting capability.
Very Bad
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
P1.7
Forest Area Clearing must be planned by considering
Very Good
Quality of Forest Area
the fulfillment of all activity aspect (mobilization) in
Clearing.
forest development especially forest product
Good
EXPLANATION
Forest Area Clearing (PWH) facilities and infrastructure are planned and implemented according to the existing standards. Forest Area Clearing (PWH) facilities and infrastructure are planned and implemented accordingly but the quality was not good.
production. The optimum intensity or compactness and total road length (main, branch or skid trail),
Average
Forest Area Clearing (PWH) facilities and infrastructure are not yet planned according to what has been implemented.
location, and road and bridge construction quality is carried out to ensure the continuity of operational
Bad
Forest Area Clearing (PWH) facilities and infrastructure are planned and implemented not according to the existing standards.
activity in the development and guidance of plantation forest and forest production activities, and its maintenance aspects.
Very Bad
There was no Forest Area Clearing (PWH) plan.
P1.8
Publication of rights of the area, especially to the
Publication of rights
community within and around the management unit to
towards the forest
provide and achieve an understanding in community
area.
awareness enhancement to actively participate in the
Good Average
There are efforts in periodical assistance or publication of community rights towards the management unit area. There are efforts in periodical assistance or publication of community rights towards the management unit area with low intensity. There are no efforts in periodical assistance or publication of community rights towards the management unit area.
forest resource sustainability. Bad P1.9
The existence of organization units on planning,
Organization unit in
production, forest support, research and development,
forest management.
conservation and environment, social community,
Good Average
All organization units are present independently and obtain sound coordination. All organization units are present independently but do not reach a sound coordination.
finance and administration, marketing/distribution, and independent Internal Supervisory Unit (SPI) and
Bad
Not organization unit are independent and obtain sound coordination.
supported with sufficient number of qualified employees can act as indicator of sincerity of the
Very Bad
The organization unit is not complete or sufficient and obtains no coordination.
Very Good
Relatively no deforestation or conversion, illegal logging, forest fire, or other kinds of disruption.
plantation forest company in production sustainability.
P2.1
Any form of forest disruption will have significant effect
Forest disruption
on yield sustainability, therefore, the size of disruption
range.
must be acknowledged to be able to determine the
Good
The effects of deforestation, conversion, illegal logging, forest fire or other kinds of disruption does not change the type and function of the forest, yet, the preplanned production management can still be accomplished.
appropriate actions. Moreover, protection activities must be performed to reduce the existing disruption level.
Average
The effects of deforestation, conversion, illegal logging, forest fire or other kinds of disruption does not change the type and function of the forest, which made the preplanned production management revised.
Bad
The effects of deforestation, conversion, illegal logging, forest fire or other kinds of disruption changed the forest landscape so that the predetermined corporate vision and objectives must be revised.
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
P2.2
The availability of seedling with genetically, physically
Very Good
Seed availability.
and physiologically sound quality, sufficient supply, and at appropriate timing is a basic asset in achieving
Good
EXPLANATION
The seedlings are produced in an appropriate quantity, high in quality, and at the right time. The seedlings are produced in an appropriate quantity, at the right time, but with average quality.
production sustainability in forest plantation. Seedling with high genetic quality is likely to increase biomass
Average
The seedling are produced in an appropriate quantity, but not at the right time
productivity, which is the objective of forest production in each rotation. Sufficient supply of seedling and its
Bad
quality.
appropriate timing will ensure the success of planting and maintenance activities, and achievement of forest
Very Bad The seedling are produced less in quantity, low in quality and not at the right time.
production target, also in reducing plant mortality rate.
P2.3
Planting capability is a basic asset towards forest
Planting capability
production sustainability for the next cycle. Planting
and result quality.
statistics are a record of planting completed years
The seedlings are produced in a less appropriate quantity, not at the right time, or at the right quantity and the right time but in low
Very Good Good
The planting reached 100% of the targeted area with good planting quality. The planting reached 100% of the targeted area but with a reduced amount of planting quality.
before that consist of planting quantification and its achievements, and other records of matters related to
Average
The planting reached 90% to <100% of the targeted area.
planting procedure, unaccomplishment, barriers and what causes it.
Bad
The planting reached 70% to 90% of the targeted area.
The records can be used as monitoring and evaluation material leading to planting procedure improvement for better assurance of future production sustainability.
Very Bad
The planting reached <70% of the targeted area.
Basically, maintenance provides growth space for P2.4
every plant. Appropriate procedure, order and
Maintenance
maintenance intensity for every growth level will
capability and result
provide bigger growth opportunity. As with harvesting,
quality.
order in time-based maintenance activities will simplify the management of sustainability for the next cycle
Very Good Good
The maintenance reached an area of <90% of the planned target with good quality. The maintenance reached an area of >90% of the planned target but with a reduced amount of quality
Average
The maintenance reached an area of 70%-90% of the planned target.
Bad
The maintenance reached an area of 50%-70% of the planned target.
and it can support the realization of production sustainability.
Very Bad
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
The maintenance reached an area of <50% of the planned target.
SCORE
Very Good
EXPLANATION
The result of the implementation of forest product harvesting particularly the reduced impact logging in all Forest Clearing Area
P2.5
Every forest product harvesting stage that effect the
Environmental-friendly
environment (especially vital negative effects) must be
scheme, shows that it went well through information, organization, and action (SOP) monitoring instrument to hold back the negative
forest harvest system
plotted clearly in terms of location, type and weight of
impact of forest product harvesting.
implementation.
effects occurred, so that control implementation such as reduced impact logging can be determined in
Average
scheme, shows that it did not went well, although the information, organization, and action (SOP) monitoring instrument to hold back
minimizing the effects on the location of harvest. The procurement of erosion control structures at skid trail, transportation road, log-yard, and at other
The result of the implementation of forest product harvesting particularly the reduced impact logging in all Forest Clearing Area the negative impact of forest product harvesting existed.
Very Bad
structural areas is one of the efforts in forest utilization
There were no important impact indicator map, the information, organization, and action (SOP) monitoring instrument to hold back
impact control towards physical components of the
the negative impact of forest product harvesting, and the reduced impact logging was not implemented.
environment, which soon after, decreases negative impacts on production sustainability.
Very Good
The information, organization, and action (SOP) supervisors are present; MIS instruments can be utilized by all level (within the
P2.6
Managerial policy in terms of the seriousness of the
Management
plantation forest company in production sustainability,
organization structure) and can be controlled by the Internal Supervising System (Sistem Pengawas Internal [SPI]). Manage a
Information System.
will be identified from the management information
synchronized decision making process between planning and production units (planning unit as work reference).
system, whether it was being used in the decision making process or not. Therefore, it requires a
Good
The information, organization, and action supervisors are present and can be controlled by the Internal Supervising System (Sistem Pengawas Internal [SPI]), but the MIS instruments can only be used by certain level (within the organization structure).
monitoring and management system proportionate to the size of the management unit area and clarity of decision-making procedure that matches decisions in
Average
The information, organization, and action supervisors are present and can be controlled by the Internal Supervising System (Sistem Pengawas Internal [SPI]), but the MIS instruments can not be utilized at all levels.
every organization unit (planning, production and control, and other work support unit). Bad
The information, organization, and action supervisors are present but the SPI cannot function properly, and the MIS instruments cannot be utilized at all levels.
P2.7
Forest management sustainability requires sufficient
The continuance and
funding for forest reformation and conservation,
orderliness of funding
conservation area and natural biodiversity
for every activity
management (including
aspects.
protected/endemic/endangered species), forest
Very Bad
There is no synchronized decision making process between planning and production units and SPI cannot function properly.
Very Good
A sufficient amount of funding is available; it is made rational, and easily obtained.
Good
A sufficient amount of funding is available; it is made rational, but not easily obtainable.
Bad
The available funding is insufficient, but is easily obtained.
production and control, market/customer service, research and development, and facility and work
Very Bad
The available funding is insufficient and not easily obtainable.
equipment procurement, and also human resource development.
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
EXPLANATION
P3.1
Area partitioning according to its purposes is based on
Production area
land physical characteristics that are not managed
organization.
properly, such as mountain slopes and its sensitivity towards erosion, and external factors such as rain
Very Good
There are implementations of proper planning activities on parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management, and formed /resembling a normal forest classification.
Good
T There are implementations of proper planning activities on parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management, but has not formed a normal forest classification.
intensity. It is then followed with an effective area setting into a sustainable unit and/or part of a forest into blocks that must show the existence of time
Average
There are implementations of proper planning activities on parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management, but actions towards the content of a block was not properly done and did not form a normal forest classification.
dimension during a cycle. Block and plot in the field must be arranged according to rational and consistent time scheduling to minimize technical and financial
Bad
The organization of parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management only came to the planning stage.
structure alteration practices. Therefore, forest development practices, maintenance and production
Very Bad
There are no planning activities on parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management or its implementation in the field.
can be accurately implemented.
P3.2
The high level of harvesting productivity is represented
Efficiency on
by the comparison between the sizes of production
harvesting and
and potential of the harvested forest, which can be
utilization of planted
attained if harvesting is performed in an efficient way.
forest products.
This is shown by the exploitation factor unit, maximum
Good Average Bad
High exploitation factor with minimum waste. High exploitation factor with relatively high waste formation. The exploitation factor is not appropriate with high waste formation.
utilization of forest products (wood biomass), and appropriate harvesting system or technique, so that these important factors act as reference for plantation forest product harvesting technique.
P3.3
Forest product business administration from the forest
Internal forest product
to last log pond in the management unit can provide
administration.
guarantee of forest product harvesting implementation
Very Good
There is an internal forest product management and running properly.
Average
There is an internal forest product management, but not running properly.
Very Bad
There is no internal forest product management.
control, in terms of quantity and origin. The lettering method used can at least guarantee an orderly administration process and can avoid forest product distribution outflow.
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
P3.4
Business profitability that can reach the minimum
Compatibility of the
attractive rate of return (MARR) is the main
effective production
prerequisite for a management unit. Every cost must
area with the
be covered by revenue; especially those that come
expected business
from utilized forest products. Without being able to
profitability/corporate
reach MARR, the effects of high cost and/or low
soundness.
revenue will bring in potential excess felling or
SCORE
Very Good Good
EXPLANATION
Liquidity of >200%, profitability and solvability of ≥ interest rate. Liquidity of 100-200%, profitability and solvability of ≥ the interest rate.
Average
Liquidity of <100%, profitability and solvability of ≥ the interest rate.
Bad
Liquidity of <100%, profitability and solvability of < the interest rate.
digression from production sustainability regulations. Nevertheless, corporate soundness will depend on its daily condition.
P3.5
Every management activity aspect, especially
Plantation forest
treatment on silviculture to increase sustainable forest
research utilization
productivity, improvement of product quality and
and development.
performance must utilize research and development resulted from the R&D division or other R&D
Very Good Good Average
Utilizing self-research and development results or other R&D firm’s as means of corporate quality and performance improvement. Utilizing self-research and development results as means of corporate quality and performance improvement. Not yet utilizing research and development results as means of corporate quality and performance improvement.
institutions. Bad
Not utilizing research and development results at all and no effort in corporate quality and performance improvement (no R&D unit).
P3.6
Business partnership establishment with the local
Establishment of
community confirms that the management unit is
business partnership
welcomed in the region. The development of public
with the local
forest and community forest cultivation till alter the
community.
attention and dependency of the local community for
Very Good Good Average
Obtain a business partnership with the local community in main and supporting activities with equal share. Obtain a business partnership with the local community only in main activities with equal share. Obtain a business partnership with the local community only in supporting activities with equal share.
the plantation forestland; they even can be partners in managing the forest. Moreover, forest product
Bad
Obtain a business partnership with the local community but without equal share.
utilization management must be capable in accommodating the interest of the local community
Very Bad
There is no business partnership with the local community.
who is dependent to the forest.
P3.7
The increasing forest stumpage/stand asset and
Forest stumpage
considered as capital that must not depreciate is an
asset enhancement.
effort on business improvement and reinvestment that
Good Average
There are capital assets and reinvested in the forest so that assets in forest stands always increases. There are capital assets and reinvested in the forest but assets in forest stands do not increase (stable).
performs long-term costing. There are capital assets but only some are reinvested in the forest in the form of forest stands.
Bad Very Bad
There are capital assets but only a small number are reinvested in the forest in the form of forest stands.
4.2 Ecology/Environment Aspect
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
EXPLANATION
Very Good
The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is
E1.1
Conservation region that has been appointed
The percentage or actual breadth
and/or acknowledged by related stakeholders and
ratio of an appointed and well
met the environmental biophysical considerations
running conservation area, to its
will guarantee the maintenance of land quality
ideal breadth.
and the sustainability of the water management
80% from the ideal breadth and well-functioning and/or the proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was
within the plantation forest management.
appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is >80% from the ideal breadth and functioning in an average performance.
>80% from the ideal breadth and well functioning. Good
Average
The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is 50-
The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is <50% from the ideal breadth and well-functioning and/or the proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is 50-80% from the ideal breadth and functioning in an average performance and/or acknowledged by related parties is >80% from the ideal breadth and badly functioning.
Bad
The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is <50% from the ideal breadth and functioning in an average performance and/or acknowledged by related parties is 50-80% from the ideal breadth and badly functioning.
Very Bad
The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is <50% from the ideal breadth and badly functioning.
E1.2
The effective production area is a land within the
The planning of effective
plantation forest area that can be effectively
production area structuring based
planted with selected plants based on ecological
on the appropriateness and
feasibility and corresponds with corporate goals.
capability of land and its water
To make sure that the productivity of the selected
function continuance.
plant is guaranteed in a long period, the effective
Very Good Good
The production area is appropriate and more than 80% of the area is structured. The production area is adequately appropriate and/or the production area is appropriate and more than 50-80% of the area is structured.
Average
The production area is very appropriate but the area structured is less than 50% and/or the production area is adequately
production area must be managed based on the
appropriate and the structured area is 50-80% and/or the production area is in accordance to its margin and the area structured
land compatibility and capability, and the
is more than 80%.
sustainability of the water management function. Bad
The production area is adequately appropriate but the area structured is less than 50% and/or the production area is in accordance to its margin and the structured area is 50-80%.
Very Bad
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
The production area is in accordance to its margin but the area structured is less than 50%.
EXPLANATION
E1.3
Border management or border sign is one of the
The percentage or ratio of the
indicators to show that an arrangement has been
actual boundaries of a
done. Arrangements based on the ideal ratio of
conservation area and effective
the conservation and production forest on the
production area (appropriateness
actual border sign will guarantee the sustainability
and capability of land and its water
of land and water function.
Very Good Good
The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is >80% from the ideal quantity and well functioning. The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is 50-80% from the ideal quantity and well functioning and/or the proportion of the actual protected land and production area is >80% from the ideal quantity and has average function.
Average
The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is <50% from the ideal quantity and well-functioning and/or the
function continuance) to its ideal
proportion of the actual protected land and production area is 50-80% from the ideal quantity and has average function and/or
boundaries.
the proportion of the actual protected land and production area is >80% from the ideal quantity and badly functioning. Bad
The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is <50% from the ideal quantity and has average function and/or the proportion of the actual protected land and production area is 50-80% from the ideal quantity and badly functioning.
E1.4
The stated conservation area will not be noticed if
The percentage or ratio of the
there are no clear guideposts on the borders. The
boundaries of a well running
posts will clearly state the border between the
conservation area to its ideal
conservation area (height, slope steepness, and
boundaries.
peat density) with the production/felling area and other areas. These guideposts will not indicate
Very Bad
The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is <50% from the ideal quantity and badly functioning.
Very Good
The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is >80% from its ideal quantity and well functioning.
Good
The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is 50-80% from its ideal quantity and well functioning and/or the proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is >80% from its ideal quantity and has average function.
Average
The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is <50% from its ideal quantity and well-functioning and/or the proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is 50-80% from its ideal quantity and has average function and/or the
anything unless maintained properly.
proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is >80% from its ideal quantity and badly functioning. Bad
The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is <50% from its ideal quantity and has average function and/or the proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is 50-80% from its ideal quantity and badly functioning.
Very Bad
The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is <50% from its ideal quantity and badly functioning.
E1.5
Erosion caused by silviculture practices such as
The planning and implementation
during felling period or land clearing can be
of silviculture system that can
controlled by repairing land coverings as soon as
control erosion in the cut up or
possible through planting and mulching, and
production area.
minimizing the usage of heavy equipment that might increase soil density, which burdens land
Very Good Good
The SOP on silviculture system implementation meets the standards and has good implementation level. The SOP on silviculture system implementation meets the standards and has average implementation level and/or the SOP does not meet the standards but has good implementation level.
Average
The SOP on silviculture system implementation meets the standards but has poor implementation level and/or the SOP does not meet the standards but has average implementation level.
quality (soil physics and chemistry) and water management. Bad
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
E1.6
Production activities that involves land
Change in soil fertility (physical
preparation to plantation, maintenance and
and chemical), including the
harvesting, significantly influence soil fertility
production waste contamination.
level, in terms of soil chemical and physical elements. Soil fertility can be disrupted by the
SCORE
Very Good
The SOP on silviculture system implementation does not meet the standards and has poor implementation level.
EXPLANATION
There is an increase in land fertility and no trace of contamination.
Good
Land fertility is stable and no trace of contamination and/or land fertility increases but there is a trace of contamination.
Average
Land fertility decreases and no trace of contamination and/or land fertility is stable but there is a trace of contamination.
abundance of chemistry/organic substances caused by over-fertilization or contamination in the production process such as mycorhizza fungi contamination that affects land fertility. Change in fertility level will tend to decrease if the management unit does not maintain land fertility, stated in the nutrient budget, soil compaction, and the top soil and type of plant.
Bad
Land fertility decreases and there is a trace of contamination.
E1.7
The loss of top soil more than the tolerable soil
The percentage of change of land
loss level shows that the plantation forest
erosion on the production area.
management disregards soil conservation aspects. The effect of plantation forest toward soil
Very Good
Erosion Danger Index is low (IBE < 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is low (< 100 mg/l).
Good
Erosion Danger Index is low (IBE < 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content
other than accelerated erosion is the decrease in
in the water body is average (100 - 250 mg/l) and/or Erosion Danger Index is average (IBE = 1) and the contribution of the
soil physical character, such as compaction,
management unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is low (< 100 mg/l).
caused by incorrect land clearing method. Then it is the increase of surface run-off, cause by soil
Average
Erosion Danger Index is low (IBE < 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content
compaction that can cause change in river flow
in the water body is high (> 100 mg/l) and/or Erosion Danger Index is high (IBE > 1) and the contribution of the management
debit.
unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is low (< 100 mg/l) and/or Erosion Danger Index is average (IBE = 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is average (100 - 250 mg/l). Bad
Erosion Danger Index is average (IBE = 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is high (> 250 mg/l) and/or Erosion Danger Index is high (IBE > 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is average (100 - 250 mg/l).
Very Bad
Erosion Danger Index is high (IBE > 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is high (> 250 mg/l).
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
EXPLANATION
E1.8
The vegetation structure in the conservation area
The percentage of change or
is closely related to the interception of rainfall
disappearance of vegetation
(stem-flow and throughfall) and into the soil.
structure and species in the
This relates to the erosion control and water
conservation area.
management around water bodies. Therefore, if
Very Good Good Average
The vegetation structure changes <10% and no species missing. The vegetation structure changes 20-30% but there are missing species. The vegetation structure changes 40% and no species missing and/or the vegetation structure changes 20-30% but there are missing species.
the vegetation structure around the water body cannot support rainfall interception, erosion level will increase in the area and disrupt the functions of the water bodies. Besides as wildlifeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s habitat and corridor, and source of genes, secure place for plant community and types, the conservation forest must also be the center of attention in activities in natural environment resources protection and maintenance by the plantation forest management unit.
Bad
The vegetation structure changes >40% but there are missing species.
Very Good
In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debits is low (Qmax/Qmin < 20) and the
E1.9
The vegetation structure in the conservation area
The percentage of quantitative
is closely related to the interception of rainfall
change (river debit), continuity
(stem-flow and throughfall) and into the soil.
change (constant water supply)
This relates to the erosion control and water
and quality change (chemical,
management around water bodies. Therefore, if
physic-chemical quality of water is average according to the existing quality standard and/or the ratio between
solid, and suspension) in water
the vegetation structure around the water body
maximum/minimum debit is average (Qmax/Qmin 20-50) and the physic-chemical quality of water is good according to the
bodies to the existing standard
cannot support rainfall interception, erosion level
existing quality standard.
measurement caused by
will increase in the area and disrupt the functions
management unitâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s activity.
of the water bodies. Besides as wildlifeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s habitat
physic-chemical quality of water is high according to the existing quality standard. Good
Average
In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is low (Qmax/Qmin < 20) and the
In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is low (Qmax/Qmin < 20) and the
and corridor, and source of genes, secure place
physic-chemical quality of water is bad according to the existing quality standard and/or the ratio between maximum/minimum
for plant community and types, the conservation
debit is high (Qmax/Qmin > 50) and the physic-chemical quality of water is good according to the existing quality standard
forest must also be the center of attention in
and/or the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is average (Qmax/Qmin 20-50) and the physic-chemical quality of water is
activities in natural environment resources
average according to the existing quality standard.
protection and maintenance by the plantation forest management unit.
Bad
In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is average (Qmax/Qmin 20-50) and the physic-chemical quality of water is bad according to the existing quality standard and/or the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is high (Qmax/Qmin > 50) and the physic-chemical quality of water is average according to the existing quality standard.
Very Bad
In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is high (Qmax/Qmin > 50) the physicchemical quality of water is bad according to the existing quality standard.
E1.10
Land quality condition and water management
Land utilization pattern/system
function sustainability is influenced by land
implementation in planting
utilization system/pattern using suitable plant type
activities and plant forest
and considers the condition of the local
stumpage maintenance, which
environment, biophysical and social cultural
may influence land quality and
elements of the community.
Good Average Bad
There is a system/pattern of land utilization that provides benefit to the community and the main plant stands/stumpage. There is a system/pattern of land utilization but does not provide benefit to the community or the main plant stands/stumpage. There is no system/pattern of land utilization.
water course function. INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
EXPLANATION
E1.11
Intensity of impact control on soil shows the
Protection of land from erosion
persistence of the plantation forest management
and land and water contamination
in avoiding impact of the plantation forest
(the usage of pesticide, herbicide,
utilization on environmental physical components.
and environmental-friendly
Impact control on soil can be shown in soil
fertilizer).
conservation activities.
E1.12
The sustainability of the function of conservation
Activities in maintenance and
region within a plantation forest management unit
rehabilitation of forest type
can be maintained if the vegetation structure in
structure and composition
the region is well taken care of. Therefore, the
(vegetation) of conservation area.
water management function will also run well. Further, in vegetation structure rehabilitation and
Good Average
Obtain SOP in soil protection from erosion and implements it in the field. Obtain SOP in soil protection from erosion but does not implement it in the field.
Bad
There is no SOP on soil protection from erosion.
Good
Obtain SOP in structure maintenance and rehabilitation and forest type (vegetation) composition, and implements it in the field.
Average
Obtain SOP in structure maintenance and rehabilitation and forest type (vegetation) composition, but does not implement it in the field.
Bad
There is no SOP in structure maintenance and rehabilitation and forest type (vegetation) composition.
Good
Obtain waste handling SOP and implements it in the field.
maintenance, screening of plant types needs attention to ensure long-term land and water management function.
E1.13
A water body is a river mouth for waste (organic
Waste handling system to
and inorganic) produced by all activities in the
preserve land quality and
plantation forest management unit. Most waste is
watercourse function
non-biodegradable (plastic, tin can, etc.) and
sustainability.
requires special treatment to avoid contamination to the environment. The location of the waste treatment facility determines the possibilities/ consequences towards the sustainability of land quality and water function. If the location and treatment are not accurately determined, the sustainability of water function in the water bodies may possibly be disrupted.
Average Bad
Obtain waste handling SOP but does not implement it in the field. There is no waste handling SOP.
E1.14
The utilization of chemical elements in the
Usage of chemical elements that
management unit can potentially contaminate
may contaminate water.
water bodies. Therefore, it must be carefully
Good Average
Does not use any chemical substances. Uses chemical substances but cannot be traced in the water body.
managed. Bad
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
E1.15
In increasing community welfare, a vast
Active community involvement in
opportunity is made available in the management
the environmental-friendly land
unit area. They are opportunities to use soil and
utilization pattern system.
land as extensive as possible as long as it does
Uses chemical substances that can be traced in the water body.
SCORE
Good Average
EXPLANATION
The community group involved in the management unit activities focuses on a business that does not depend on the land. The community group involved in the plantation forest management unit activities focuses on a business that depends on the land by implementing soil conservation techniques.
not disrupt the main plants and can increase its quality.
Bad
The community group involved in the plantation forest management unit activities focuses on a business that depends on the land without implementing soil conservation techniques.
Very Good
The proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is >80% from its ideal breadth that must be structured
E2.1
Protected areas based on the sustainability of
The percentage of the actual
gene resources, unique and/or endangered
breadth of the conservation area
flora/fauna habitation, wildlife corridor, buffer
(gene resources, exotic and/or
zone, and well-managed forest resources and its
endangered flora/fauna habitat,
recognition by stakeholders and the fulfillment in
structured and well functioned and/or the actual breadth of the well-structured protected land is >80% from its ideal breadth that
wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and
meeting field biophysical considerations will
must be structured and functioned in an average performance.
appointed and well-managed
guarantee the preservation of natural diversity.
and well functioned. Good
Average
forest resources and utilized by
The proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is 50-80% from its ideal breadth that must be
The proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is <50% from its ideal breadth that must be structured
the community) to the ideal
and well-functioned and/or the proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is 50-80% from its ideal
breadth of the conservation area.
breadth that must be structured and functioned in an average performance and/or the proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is >80% from its ideal breadth that must be structured and badly functioned. Bad
The proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is <50% from its ideal breadth that must be structured and functioned in an average performance and/or the proportion of the well structured actual breadth of the protected land is 5080% from its ideal breadth that must be structured and badly functioned.
Very Bad
The proportion of the actual breadth of the well-structured protected land and badly functioned is <50% of its ideal breadth that must be structured.
E2.2
The arrangement of the management unit
The area structuring of
working area that considers the interest of
management unit based on the
flora/fauna conservation, plantation forest stands
importance of flora/fauna
and resources that is useful to the local
conservation, plant forest
community will guarantee the preservation of the
stumpage protection, and forest
natural diversity besides maintaining the stability
resources that is very useful for
of the ecosystem of plantation forest stands in the
the local community.
long run.
Good
The management unit area structuring considers the importance of flora/fauna conservation; plantation forest stands protection, and forest resources that are beneficial to the local community.
Average
The management unit area structuring less considers the importance of flora/fauna conservation; plantation forest stands protection, and forest resources that are beneficial to the local community.
Bad
The management unit area structuring does not consider the importance of flora/fauna conservation; plantation forest stands protection, and forest resources that are beneficial to the local community.
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
EXPLANATION
Very Good
The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is >80% of the ideal proportion and well
E2.3
The conservation area (gene resources,
The percentage of the actual
unique/endemic and/or endangered flora/fauna
breadth of conservation area
habitation, wildlife corridor, buffer zone) that are
(gene resources, exotic and/or
well structured and clearly mapped, which
endangered flora/fauna habitat,
existence can be easily monitored and evaluated
well functioning and/or the actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is >80% of the
wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and
in relation to the process of the system within the
ideal proportion and functioning in average performance.
life plant area utilized by the
unit and the surrounding area to guarantee a
community) that is well structured
sustainable natural diversity.
functioning. Good
Average
The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is 50-80% of the ideal proportion and
The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is <50% of the ideal proportion and well-
to the ideal breadth of the
functioning and/or the actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is 50-80% of the ideal
conservation area.
proportion and functioning in an average performance and/or the actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is >80% of the ideal proportion and badly functioning. Bad
The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is <50% of the ideal proportion and functioning in an average performance and/or the actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is 50-80% of the ideal proportion and badly functioning.
Very Bad
The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is <50% of the ideal proportion and badly functioning.
E2.4
Border maintenance means not only maintaining
The assurance/maintenance of
guideposts and inspection route but also the
conservation area security (gene
control shift of conservation area function to other
resources, exotic and/or
form, and reducing the size of the area that has
endangered flora/fauna habitat,
no clear reasonable basis. Further, the meaning
wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and
of maintenance should include activities in
forest resources utilized by the
evaluation and rehabilitation of conservation area
community).
condition, to keep it well functioning in the long
Good
The conservation area (gene resources, exotic and/or endangered flora/fauna habitat, wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and forest resources utilized by the community) is in a safe condition.
Average
The conservation area (gene resources, exotic and/or endangered flora/fauna habitat, wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and forest resources utilized by the community) is in a less safe condition.
Bad
The conservation area (gene resources, exotic and/or endangered flora/fauna habitat, wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and forest resources utilized by the community) is not in a safe condition.
run.
E2.5
The main plant management in the plantation
Wildlife diversity in the production
forest area influences the diversity of wildlife in
area.
the region. Based on the early condition of the
Good
There is an increase in wildlife diversity in the production area.
Average
There is no increase in wildlife diversity in the production area.
Bad
There is a reduction in wildlife diversity in the production area.
wildlife habitat, the plantation forest management can decrease and/or increase their diversity.
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
EXPLANATION
E2.6
The development of the natural resource
Forest resources information
information network system by the management
system (location, potential,
unit and other stakeholders is an implementation
cultivation technique, harvesting
of the natural diversity conservation strategy and
technique, etc.).
welfare improvement of the local community. With
Good Average Bad
There are forest resource information system design and being implemented in the field. There are forest resource information system design but not implemented in the field. There is no forest resource information system design.
this system, the local community can utilize the natural resources appropriately in a long period. Moreover, the local community can participate in maintaining and protecting its natural resources.
E2.7
Control over pest/disease and parasite is a
Pest, disease, and parasite control
necessary action in maintaining forest stands. In
activities using environmental-
its activity, the actions are conducted by avoiding
friendly technology (using natural
or restricting the usage of chemical-based
predator), so that the natural
pesticides, parasite control, which is considered
ecosystem in the management
to have significant effects on natural diversity.
Very Good Good
Control of pest/disease and parasites using integrated pest management system and does not disrupt the ecological system. Control of pest/disease and parasites biologically and does not disrupt the ecological system and/or control of pest/disease and parasites using integrated pest management system that disrupts the ecological system.
Average
Control of pest/disease and parasites using chemical substances and does not disrupt the ecological system and/or control of pest/disease and parasites biologically that disrupts the ecological system.
unit area wonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t be disrupted.
E2.8
To create a condition where forest resources can
The existence of forest resources
be utilized sustainably by the community, one
that can be utilized by the local
must actively involved in forest resource
community.
management within the plantation forest management unit.
Bad
Control of pest/disease and parasites using chemical substances that disrupts the ecological system.
Good
There are forest resources that can be utilized by the local community, who has access in utilizing it.
Average Bad
There are forest resources that can be utilized by the local community, who has access in utilizing it but does not practice it. There are forest resources that can be utilized by the local community but the locals do not have access to it.
4.3 Social Economy and Cultural Aspect
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
S1.1
Forest deployment in a certain region must comply
The certainty of the
with the land tenure system, which some are
forest utilization area
represented in various pattern of land use. Therefore,
status.
the status of the utilization area must be clear in its ownership and purpose. The concession area and the
SCORE
Very Good
EXPLANATION
No claim on the status of land utilization area.
Average
There are claims on the land utilization area resolved through an agreed upon conflict management system.
Very Bad
There are claims and conflicts of the land utilization area that are not resolved through the agreed upon conflict management system.
Very Good
The local community is allowed to continue the non-timber natural resource utilization within the management unit concession area
local community must be free of all claims of possession and of forced clearance by each party.
S1.2
The management unit provides certainty and
The certainty of
assurance to the local community to utilize non-timber
according the agreed procedure, and there are facilities for the community, provided by the unit, for utilizing non-timber natural
access to the forest
resources in the concession area such as water,
resources.
utilization by the
animals and other non-timber forest products. This
community.
utilization must be permitted as long as it does not
Average
The local community is allowed to continue the non-timber natural resource utilization within the management unit concession area according the agreed procedure but there are no facilities for the community provided by the unit for utilizing non-timber natural
alter land use.
resources. Very Bad
The local community is prohibited to continue the non-timber natural resource utilization within the management unit concession area.
S1.3
The development of the business area of a
The assurance of
management unit must consider communication and
communications and
traditional transportation lines that exists before the
transportations.
presence of the unit.
Very Good
The management unit maintained and enhanced the quality of existing communication and traditional transportation lines prior to management unit presence.
Average
The management unit does not disrupt the quality of existing communication and traditional transportation lines prior to management unit presence.
Very Bad
The management unit damages and/or closes the existing communication and traditional transportation lines prior to management unit presence.
S1.4
The management unit should take into account
Employment
matters of employment related to the recruitment
opportunity for the
process for the local community. The process should
community.
consider the available local employment market.
Very Good
The recruitment of employees is open-based, non-discriminative, and publicized at community level, and there are >50% of the workers who came from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession area.
Good
The recruitment of employees is open-based, non-discriminative, and publicized at community level, and there are 31-50% of the workers who came from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession area.
Information on vacancies in the unit must be made public, indiscriminating, and sufficient. Average
The recruitment of employees is open-based, non-discriminative, but merely publicized at community level, and there are 15-30% of the workers who came from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession.
Bad
The recruitment of employees is open-based, non-discriminative, but not publicized at community level, and there are <15% of the workers who came from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession area.
Very Bad INDICATOR
DEFINITION
S1.5
In daily social economic environment, the
Management unit
management unit permits the local community to use
infrastructure
the physical facilities built in the concession area given
utilization by the
that it does not disrupt any process and not
community.
There are no workers coming from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession area.
SCORE
Very Good
EXPLANATION
The management unit allows the local community to use the available physical and social facility.
Average
The management unit allows the local community to use the available physical or social facility.
endangering the safety of the community.
Very Bad
The management unit prohibits the local community to use the available physical or social facility.
S2.1
In forest utilization activities, the management unit
Very Good
The existence of the social cultural activities of the community and artifacts found within the concession area are sustained and
The management unit
must consider the social and cultural impact such as
considers the social
isolation caused by a condition where a community is
cultural impact to the
separated from the forest utilization process; impact
community.
causing cultural degradation such as the impairment of a historical site and lost of access to perform social cultural activities in a certain location caused by the process.
protected by the management unit and excluded from the working area. Average
The social cultural activities of the community and artifacts found within the concession area are excluded from the working area.
Very Bad
The management unit neglects the existence of the social cultural activities of the community and artifacts found within the concession area.
S2.2
The management unit recompenses the
Consequences
consequences caused by its activities that impair the
towards utilization or
natural resources, transfers of rights of ownership and
damage of resources
the possibility of utilizing local knowledge. The
owned by local
recompensation must be performed rationally and
community.
mutually based on collective agreement and complied
Very Good
The management unit recompenses the loss suffered by the community according to a mutual agreement, benefiting both parties.
Good
The management unit recompense the loss suffered by the community but not according to a mutual agreement set by both parties.
Average
The management unit recompenses the loss suffered by the community according to the agreement based on the existing regulation of the authorities.
by the parties involved. Therefore, the unit is expected to develop a procedure of compensation towards the
Bad
The management unit recompenses the loss suffered by the community according to the standards set by the management unit.
utilization or impairment of resources owned by the community.
Very Bad
The management unit does not recompensate the loss suffered by the community caused by the forest utilization activities.
S2.3
Forest utilization activities held by the management
Very Good
The employment variation increases as to the presence of the forest utilization activities and support of the management unit, which
Increasing the variety
unit are expected to provide economic benefit to the
of economic
local community such as creating employment
resources for the local
opportunities related to the presence. The opportunity
community.
will increase the choices of jobs for the community.
increases community household income. Average
The employment variation increases as to the presence of the forest utilization activities and support of the management unit, but does not significantly increases community household income.
The unit is also expected to develop an economic development program based on the local potentials.
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
Very Bad
SCORE
The employment variation stays the same and so does the community household income.
EXPLANATION
S2.4
In forest utilization activities, the management unit
A sound
must care about the impact of technology to the
environmental
environment, in terms of potential chemical
guarantee for the local
contamination or air and noise pollution, etc. the unit
community.
must at least demonstrate some effort to manage the
Very Good
The management unit takes into account the choices of technology utilization related to environmental impact and obtain a supportive environmental management activity.
Average
The management unit takes into account the choices of technology utilization related to environmental impact but the environmental management is not well implemented.
impact. Very Bad
The management unit does not take into account the choices of technology utilization related to environmental impact and has no supporting environmental management activity.
S2.5
The management unit is expected to be responsible to
Assurance on
the community health status. The responsibility is
community health
demonstrated in proactively increase the health quality
status.
of the community, cooperation with health authorities,
Very Good
The health of the community is assured and there are active efforts of the management unit in increasing health status of the community.
Average
There are efforts of the management unit in increasing community health status by providing health facilities without health service financial support.
and accessibility of health facility in the management unit.
S2.6
The management unit supports the structuring of
Public facility for local
general facilities as part of the social obligation to the
community.
community. This program is planned and pays close attention to problems and settlements within the
Very Bad
The health condition of the community is not assured and there are no efforts in bad health prevention by the unit.
Very Good
The general facility procurement program is prepared based on the problems and needs of the community; it is participatively planned and implemented.
Average
The general facility procurement program is prepared based on the regulations and guidance of a related government organization, without considering participative planning and implementation.
community, local necessities, and participating the community in the planning and implementation of the program.
Very Bad
There is no planned general facility procurement preparation.
S2.7
The presence of a management unit will affect the
Functioning the
social cultural life of a certain region. To control the
conflict management
effects of its presence, the unit must develop a conflict
process.
management system where conflict cases and potentials are discussed, settled and managed. The
Very Good Good Average
No significant conflict occurring between the management unit and the local community in effect of the conflict management function. There are conflicts that are well managed through an agreed procedure. There are conflicts that are well managed through corporate rules.
unit must perform the system and the procedure approved and accepted by the community. The
Bad
There are conflicts that are settled by the security officers.
procedure must consider the sense of fairness and balance in the negotiation process. It must also be
Very Bad
There are on-going conflicts that are unsettled.
open to all resolution alternatives, from tribe law, local consensus to formal regulations.
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
S2.8
The presence of the management unit is expected not
Very Good
Creating and
only submissively affect the economic lives but must
maintaining
actively participate in developing community
productivity of the
economics. The unitâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s activity in community
local community.
development is represented in various programs in social administration frame.
EXPLANATION
The management unit actively develops the community economics so that the local business productivity rises significantly.
Average
The management unit actively develops the community economics but not so optimum in increasing local business productivity.
Very Bad
The presence of the management unit has no effect in community business productivity.
S2.9
Besides providing economic values to the community,
Substantial
the presence of a management unit must also provide
management unit
an equal benefit to a wider extent. The contribution
contributions to the
can be in the form of retribution and/or tax for regional
economic
development. Other contribution is a wider market in
development in the
the region surrounding the unit.
Very Good
the domestic market in the region surrounding the unit. Average
The management unit fulfill the obligation to pay retribution/tax on time according to rules and but not yet significantly have a positive effect to the domestic market in the region surrounding the unit.
Very Bad
management unit
The management unit fulfills the obligation to pay retribution/tax on time according to rules and significantly have a positive effect to
The management unit neglects the obligation to pay retribution/tax on time according to rules and its presents does not significantly have a positive effect on the domestic market in the region surrounding the unit.
area. S3.1
In running forest business, a management unit must
Safety and health of
pay attention to the health and safety of workers such
workers.
as providing health assurance facility, work protection instruments, regulations that provides assurance on
Very Good
There is insurance in health and work safety, work protection/security system and instruments, a sufficient health service facility, and low accident level.
Good
There is insurance in health and work safety, work protection/security system and instruments but not utilized accordingly, a sufficient health service facility, and low accident level.
work safety, and first-aid facilities. Besides for permanent workers, the protection of health and work safety must also include daily and collective workers.
Bad
There is insurance in health and work safety, work protection/security system and instruments but not utilized accordingly, an insufficient health service facility, and low accident level.
Very Bad
No insurance in health and work safety, there is a work protection/security system and instruments but not utilized accordingly, an insufficient health service facility, and high accident level.
S3.2
As a part of the production unit, workers must be
Labor involvement in
involved from the beginning in understanding their
contract arrangement.
rights and obligations. This is represented in
Very Good
The employees are involved in establishing their work agreement from the beginning.
Average
The employees are informed their rights and obligations at the beginning of their employment.
Very Bad
The employees are not involved in establishing their work agreement from the beginning and there are no clear information on their
participating their representatives in the Labor Union in the agreement arrangement process that explains
rights and obligations.
their position, rights and obligations in a management unit. This agreement is a statement of the rights and obligations of workers and the management unit that binds the two parties and acts as a media to create congenial industrial relations.
INDICATOR
DEFINITION
SCORE
S3.3
As part of the workersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; right to articulate their opinions,
Very Good
Assurance for
the management unit provides freedom to unite in a
freedom of union.
democratic, permanent, sustainable, independent
EXPLANATION
The management unit provides the freedom to form a union according to their initiative.
Average
The management unit provides the freedom to form a union according to the existing government regulations.
Very Bad
The management unit forbids the employees to form a union.
Very Good
The management unit according to the standard of feasibility provides facilities for employees.
manner and formed voluntarily. The labor union will be a media for protecting and defending the rights and interest of the workers.
S3.4
The management unit must consider the workers as
Facilities supporting
company asset. It should be represented in the
labor welfare.
procurement of welfare facilities in the working area
Average
Facilities for employees are provided by the management unit but not considering the standard of feasibility.
Very Bad
The management unit does not provide facilities for employees.
and homes.
S3.5
The unit management provides an open career system
Career improvement
for all employees based on potential and
opportunity for all
achievements. The positions are based on evaluation
labor force.
of capability, in a clear and indiscriminating promotion
Very Good
work period. Average
The management unit seriously conducts training and
Enhancement of
skill development activities for all employees as part of
education and skill for
employment capability and productivity improvement
all labor force.
program. The program can be performed in the unit or sending to another institution. The unit provides plans
There is a clear and open career level system for employees but only according to their educational background and work achievement.
system.
S3.6
There is a clear and open career level system for employees according to their educational background, achievement, potential, and
Very Bad
There is no clear and open career level system for employees according to their achievement.
Very Good
There are efforts in increasing education level and skill of employees on regular basis, which is open to all according to their potentials.
Average There are efforts in increasing education level and skill of employees but not on a regular basis. Very Bad There are no efforts in increasing education level and skill of employees.
and procedures for all employees to have the same opportunity.
S3.7
Pay and remuneration structure implemented by the
Labor wage comply
management unit, for permanent, daily and collective
with local standard.
employees must meet local standards.
Very Good
The employeesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; pay rate meets the local standard of living.
Average
The employeesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; pay rate meets the minimum regional standard of living.
Very Bad
The employeesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; pay rate does not meet the minimum regional standard of living.
The amount of money received must be able to provide sufficient living for the employee and the family according to local standard.