APURVA NAGPURE GRADUATE OF ARCHITECTURE
ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO
APURVA NAGPURE GRADUATE OF ARCHITECTURE M. 0 451 096 955 A. Sydney
E. apurvanagpure8@gmail.com LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/apurva-nagpure
EDUCATION
PROFILE
Master of Architecture (M. Arch) July 2017 - June 2019 University of Technology Sydney (UTS)
- I am a Masters of Architecture Graduate from the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) with a demonstrated history of working in the architecture and planning industry. - Capable of working with a team or individually as required with the ability to learn faster and master the same. - Good Knowledge of Design Documentation, Contract Administration, Building Code of Australia and Australian Standards required for Development Application (DA) & Complying Development Application (CDC)
Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch) June 2011 - July 2016 Savitribai Phule Pune University, India
TECHNICAL SKILLS
ARCHITECTURAL EXPERIENCE
• BIM Softwares: - Autodesk Revit
Junior Project Architect Infiniti Solutions, India
• 3D Softwares: - Rhinoceros 3D / Grasshopper - Sketchup • 2D Softwares: - Autodesk AutoCAD • Rendering Softwares: - Lumion Pro • Essential Softwares: - Adobe Indesign / Illustrator - Adobe Photoshop - Microsoft Office
Aug 2016 - Jun 2017
• Effectively communicated and coordinated with internal and external stakeholders for medium scale housing and commercial projects • Documenting the projects from the design development stage up to the construction and execution stage • Assisting in concept design study with modelling and rendering models in various 3D software Architectural Intern Kabre Consultants, India
Jul 2015 to Oct 2015
• Preparing drawing packages for the schematic design for council submission and amending drawings for resubmission • 3D designing and modelling along with rendering for client • Coordinating drawings and documentation with consultants • Attending construction site meetings with stakeholders, builders, client and engineers
AWARDS & ACTIVITIES • Presented final semester’s design project in Sydney Architecture Festival • Registered Architect: Council of Architecture (COA), India • Attended National Association of Students of Architecture (NASA) Convention • Lead National Level NASA–ANDC Trophy–(Shortlisted in top 20) • Member of Forum of Exchange & Excellence in Design (FEED)
PROFESSIONAL SKILLS
REFEREES
• Architectural Designing Skills • Researching Abilities • Presentation Skills • Computational Skills • Analytical and Problem Solving Skills • Communication Skills
• Dr. Nimish Biloria • Brooke Jackson Associate Professor Scholarly Teaching Fellow School of Architecture School of Architecture Nimish.Biloria@uts.edu.au Brooke.Jackson@uts.edu.au • Professor Deborah Ascher Barnstone Professor, School of Architecture DeborahAscher.Barnstone@uts.edu.au
2019 2017 2014 2014
BIO-KINSHIP HOUSING
CONTENTS
RECREATIONAL HUB TRANSPORTATION CENTER BUNGALOW OASIS OF THE CITY
BIO-KINSHIP Academic Group Work
The studio brief was to design a new domestic for the 21st century and come up with a diverse housing model challenging Sydney’s current ‘Apartment Design guide’.
Conceptual Diagram_Activity Plan
The premise of the new Domestic ‘Bio - Kinship’ looks at a shift from anthroprocentric to a biocentric living. A place where the necessities and values of both humans and plants becomes a shared centrality, thereby introducing a biophilic approach of co-living with plant. It repositions humans from being house owners to become caretakers and extendes the the concept of a ‘ Home’ to act as a conservatory or a sanctorium for both the dwelling. In terms of architecture, human programs are spaced through spatiality of plants , needs and priorities where the plan becomes a masterplan with a series of units acting as micro-apartments bounded by the pasture of these new members. Overall, the new domestic acts as a kinship where humans take care to sustain plants while plants in return nurture their well-being.
The system is a ratio of plant occupancy with a prescribed area in which the flexible human programs could be plugged in to perform their domestic scenario. In other words, human dwelling are spaced through spatiality of plant.
Typical Floor Layout_1
4.0M
5.0M
Plants to Space Ratio
Light Conditions
Ventilation
East / West Elevation
Typical Floor Layout_2
Plants to Space Ratio
Light Conditions
Ventilation
HOUSING Academic Individual Work
The optimum shape to fit in an unit is a rectangle
The light and ventilation is one of the prime requirements hence it was optimised by increasing the surface area of the unit
The unit then was placed so as to get maximum privacy, light and ventilation
The selected site was occupied by one of the oldest developed housing scheme in the city. It had 390 families stayng in various one and two bedroom units.
The service cores and circulation was placed in the centre, two satircases were used,spine wall staircase one was used as a feature in the design
The redevelopment of this site had perks of using the new FSI alloted according to land use zonig. As per developer the site being redeveloped was divided into two parts, one for residential and other for commercial purpose. Thus the existing families were given residential units and the commercial area was to be sold off by the developer. Considering the site context the planning was done inwards, having a central courtyard with a club house and play ground. Individual building was designed with a floorplate that spreads such that each unit gets more ventiltion and proper light in each room resulting into a scattered floor plate. Further the massing was done so as to create framed voids in the elevations.
The floor plate was designed to optimise light ventilation in all units which lead to scattered planning of the floor plates and so as to play in massing of elevation of the building
Site Plan
Site Section
Twelfth Floor
Eighth Floor with Refuge Area
Even numbered Floors
Odd numbered Floors
Exploded view showing different floorplates
East Side_Site Elevation
Complete view of the Housing Scheme
South Side_Site Elevation
Views
RECREATIONAL HUB Academic Group Work
The studio focused on urban renewal of the precinct by studying the land use pattern of the precinct and learing the potential of the sites further offering the appropriate design brief for the site. The history of the site dates backwhen it use to be a lake which eventually dried. This fertile land acted as the lung sapce in the core of the city being the only open area in the precinct. Later it was known as to be JK Grounds and was used by residents of Mysore city for sports and fitness. The school and the college around also used it as a sports facility for its students. A step to maintain the true nature of the site while improving the neighbourhood with connectivity, we decided to design a recreational hub along with transport and welness centre.
Site Plan
Elevation_Seshadri Iyer Road
The structure was planned in C-shape for inward planning
The mass of the building was raised on the opposite side of the existing public building out of respect for colonial style
The mass of the building was staggered stepping up on the other side fot the required built up area required
Further the heavy mass was broken by introducing an opening in it, finalising the massing of the structure
The building was moved away form the boundary and deeper inside the site so as to use the space between the site boundaries and the structure as a public plaza and garden making the recreational hub a part of its immediate surrounding
SPORTS COMPLEX TRANSIT PLAZA AREA SPORTS COMPLEX WELLNESS TRANSIT PLAZA AREA SPORTS COMPLEX WELLNESS PLAZA AREA SPORTS COMPLEX WELLNESS
WELLNESS
Site Zoning
Vehicular Circulation on Site
Pedestrian Circulation on Site
Builtup Mass
Elevation_JLB Road
Plan @ -6000 Level
TRANSPORTATION CENTER Academic Individual Work
This thesis aims to study, understand and explore transport facilities and develop airport standards, responding to the need of city transport and airports, in order to increase the competitiveness of international airports and the efficiency of transport flow to and from airports by proposing a multimodal transportation centre. Providing an architectural solution by designing Transportation centre giving connectivity of Metro, Intercity Buses, Shuttle buses for inter-terminal changes and taxies. Business and VIP Lounges were a part of Public Transportation Centre(PTC). Design is limited to cater Terminal 2 and urban sprawl around, on landside of Airport providing facility for Airport as well as the surrounding urban space.
Section A-A’
Master Plan
Te r m i n a l B u i l d i n g D e p a r t u re s Pariking Building
A i r p o r t Te r m i n a l Buinding
Te r m i n a l B u i l d i n g Arrivals
Airport Road Elevated access Road
Drain M e t o a n d Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n Building
Subway Connecting t o S i t e S u r ro u n d i n g s
First Floor Plan
Ground Floor Plan
Mezzanine Floor Plan @ -2.50 m
Concourse Level Plan @ -8.50 m
Platform Level Plan @ -15.00 m
Second Floor Plan
Whole Structure Assembled
Platform Level_Tactile Tiling
Section A-A’
Exploded view of the Structure
BUNGALOW Internship Work
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Working Drawing C
7
12
6 2 1452
GUEST BED 517 X 472
10 155
4
D - Y X 240 D - 90 X 240
70
1151
eq V 60 X 90
310
23
D - 90 X 240
TOILET 310 X 155
155
4
eq
23
eq
10
1181
TILE DROP
Y
156
1406
10 MULTIPURPOSE HALL 1406 X 458
3
458
3
458
458
10
B
89
23
156
LIFT 163 X 165
DW - Y X 240
11 LOBBY 473 X 200
10
208
11
10
+330
70
70
UP
DN
eq 120
eq
129
@ SECOND FLOOR PROJECTION ABOVE
12
First Floor
A
2
89
@ SECOND FLOOR PROJECTION ABOVE
Y
10
10
89
Flower Bed
70
Flower Bed
70
1
100
30
Entrance being on north, the staircase, living room and one master bedroom were placed with viewing balconies towards main road on this side. All bedrooms were placed on west and kitchen on east.
90
9
D 75 X 240
W - 240 X 120
412
KITCHEN 396 X 412
89
30 10
HOME THEATER 473 X 632
23
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Design then lead to parking as required on the ground floor, common, multipurpose room including one guest room on first and two 3 BHK units on first and second floors.
472
TILE DROP
396
5
1 D
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Client’s requirement was to have two 3 BHK units which can be accessed separately, including comon space for indoor activities and multipurpose activity.
23
6
40
9
38 45
5
517
7
632
eq
10
8
DW - 120 X 240
473
D 75 X 240
TILE DROP
60
23 156
175
242 V - 60 X 200
210 15
89 15
TOILET 125 X 210
D 75 X 240
W - 180 X 210
517
140 STANDING BALCONY
10
15
40
70 S. BALCONY 256 X 210
10 23
23
10
472
473 10
10
23
56
125 V - 60 X 90
W - 240 X 210
10
40
248 louver's as per detail
40
23
60
8
Presentation Drawings
Ground Floor
First Floor
Second / Third Floor
WORKING DRAWINGS
BAND @ + 315 & + 1575
C
2
1
3
4
993 304
13
13
45
TOILET 135 X 273
BED ROOM 304 X 428
TOILET 135 X 273
11
15
11
8
427
427
BED ROOM 359 X 427
30
60
13 428
13
45
304
23
23
359
93
EQ
W 210 X 210
7
EQ
8
93
W 60 X 90
7
EQ
W 60 X 90
EQ
15
W 150 X 60 LINTEL @ 180
EQ
7
EQ
EQ
15
V 45 X 45 LINTEL @ 150
270
30
30 V 45 X 45 LINTEL @ 150
EQ
15 93
7
15 8
W 210 X 210
427
359 8
93
15
D 90 X 240
84 W 30 X 30 LINTEL @ 180
LOBBY
11
478
LIVING ROOM 434 X 478 8 15
+1575
D AS PER LIFT MANUFACTURER SIZE
60
10
13
D2 137 X 240
90
D1 75 X 240 D 90 X 240
9
W 170 X 120
DW 159 X 240
33
60
122
15
105
W 240 X 210
45 15
165
EQ 45 15
EQ
165
PUJA
R = 21
VERANDAH 160 X 147
73
SER.BALC. 298 X 147
147
149
164
162
58
10
EQ
60
10
458
30
458
BED ROOM 340 X 458
305
8
308
10
340
W 60 X 120 8 8
DINING 305 X 338
338
W 240 X 120
338
KITCHEN 308 X 388
10
5
5
338
135
8
52
EQ
140
9
30
10
LOBBY 145 X 175
30
TOILET 240 X 140
W 75 X 75
LOBBY 153 X 200
150
LIFT
TILE DROP
30
8 1609
+315
478
114 DN
VERANDAH 143 X 452
DW 452 X SLAB HT
103
ELECTRICAL DUCT
19
T = 27 RISER = 16.58
434
30
21
143
84
194
18
10
15
V 30 X 30
17
22 20
120
16
23
147
1608 15 165
15
254
11 W 30 X 30 LINTEL @ 180
6 5
120
UP
60 D4 45 X 225
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
23
54
27 27 27 27 27 27
7
27 27 27 27 27 27
431
8
+195
120
+116.0
BAND @ + 315 & + 1575
W 45 X 45 LINTEL @ 150
15
298
10
160
10
135
10
340
993
LEVEL @ + 315 & + 1575 LEVEL@ + 630 , + 945 & + 1260
1
2
3
4
A
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
B
27 27 27
15
D
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
122
60
60
13
23
15
60
30
10
D 90 X 240
71
8
6
8
W 90 X 120
D1 75 X 240
TILE DROP
6
D1 75 X 240
TILE DROP
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
C 7
EQ
385
15
DW - 120 X 240
140
542
456
60 60
5
6 BED 542 X 352
D 75 X 240
10
EQ 443
23
473
12
A
10 326 1910 15 130 23 232 10 23
23
1547
30
166
23 23
316
W - 180 X 200
60
V - 60 X 200
BALCONY 534 X 156
166
120 129
189
27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27
10
EQ 186
EQ
DW - 240 X 240
23
166
30 V - 60 X 90
60 542
DW - 272 X 240
BALCONY 443 X 156
V - 60 X 90
245
23 D 75 X 240
EQ
27 27 27 27 27 27
BEDROOM 542 X 316
316
UP
27 27 27 27 27 27
149
45
T=270 R=150
DN
443
191
10
+675
1
D
30
342
TOILET 191 X 245
208
LIVING 443 X 571
56
473
45
EQV - 60 X 90EQ
135
135
D 75 X 240
13
TILE DROP
Y
LOBBY 473 X 200
186
23 DRESSING 342 X 255
255
W - 180 X 200
10
D - Y X 240
571
TOILET 255 X 130
255 23
45
38
60
V - 60 X 200
W - 240 X 200
tv unit
23
45 V - 45 X 45
23
155
90
D 75 X 240
137
11
571
POWDER ROOM 137 X 135
WALL UP TO SKIRTING LVL
LIFT 163 X 165
11
TILE DROP
D - 105 X 240
D - 105 X 240
40
3
38
TILE DROP
B
30
3
RCC PARDI
1
BED 562 X 326
326 DINING / FAMILY SITTING 792 X 458
220
209
262 10 10
EQ
562
45
458
DW - 213 X 240
293 10
1910
10
4
eq
TOILET 178 X 262
231
38
SERVICES AC PIPE
V - 60 X 90
60 V - 60 X 90
23 13 23
23
23 45
4
342
45
830 VERANDAH 205 X 293
5
eq
60
60
TILE DROP
DRESSING 342 X 272
107
10 COURT YARD SKYLIGHT ABOVE
120
EQ
23 23
60
10
23
LINTEL @ 180 C M V - 60 X 60
191
D 75 X 240
130
D - 75 X 240
9
D - 105 X 240
D - 105 X 240
60 10
260 STORE 260 X 130
10
9
10
30
TILE DROP
10 W - 240 X 120
186
10
EQ
10 412
60
TOILET 143 X 262
CHILDREN BED 320 X 385
KITCHEN 456 X 412
215
STANDING BALCONY
262
7
D 90 X 240
40
15
EQ
15
23
EQ
205
242 V - 60 X 200
210
S. BALCONY 451 X 210
8
23 V - 60 X 90
143
TILE DROP
30 30
23
542
140
352
EQ
W - 180 X 200
23
10
10
140
W - 240 X 200
10
15
10
13
EQ
louver's as per detail
15
2
320
352
23
40
451
40
8
15
6
60
12
2
534
23
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
OASIS OF THE CITY Academic Group Work
Sculpture Garden
Open Meeting Areas , Sport Courts
Playground
Performance Space, Open Cinema
Music Fountain Square
Quite Zone Higher level bicycle path
Pocket plaza
Concept Vision_Reimage walkability
The studio brief was about re-envisioning Sydney’s Central Station presinct through data driven design approaches. The precinct was identified to be having highest walkability ratio thus ‘Behavioural Patterns of Humans’ were simulated considering the factors like physicaity of space, urban noise and passive character of the routes. Walkability was observed, studied and understood as having different aspects and mapped on the basis of its social density rather than its spatial density. Activities and programs were listed and assocaited based on the relevant aspect of walking observed in multiple simulations. Thus, finalising the zoning of activities in a perticular space to increase the connectivity and considering the mental health of the users. This evidence based design technique of swarm intelligence helped in mapping the walkablity intensity and making the journey experiential, thus making the proposal an active Oasis of activities in the Central precinct.
92%
5%
2%
An average of 66,000 prople arrive and depart from Central Station everday
Sydney Central Station
Central Station
Social Activity
Shopping Food
Talking to friends
Food
Seating
Food
Relaxing and Reading
Journey Diagram_Current
Journey Diagram_Vision
Factors resulting into nature of an individual journey Constrained Physicality - Absense of Heirarchy - Cluttered arrangement - Lack of Stationery elements
Aspect of Walking
+
Urban Noise - Large Density of Vehicles in contact with human - Absense of Buffer Elements
Interaction
+
Passive Character - Monotony in programs - Unequal Distribution
Field of effect in terms of space
Walk n walk 0.45
Behaviour Individual Behaviour Passive / less interactive behavior
Walk n talk 0.9 - 1.2
Stop n talk 0.9 - 1.2
Social Behaviour Interaction between two to three people in terms of friends, colleagues
Walk n look 0.9 - 1.2
Walk look n learn
3.7 - 4.5
Walk n Waltz
1.2 - 3.7
Mapping Intensity in terms of Walkability Exploring different aspects of walking and its relation to mental health
Public Behaviour Interaction invloving a large number of crowd
Computational Strategy_Process Simulations 1 Existing
Simulations Noise 2
Simulations 3 Silent Areas
Simulations 4 Improved Connectivity
Simulations 5 Functions
Darling Harbour
Belmore Park
George Street Little Regent Street
Central Park
Devonshire Street AlfredPark
Devonshire Street
George Street
Railway Square
Central Tunnel
Proposed Plan
Upper Concourse as urban scape Devonshire Street
George Street
Railway Square Existing tunnel as lower concourse
Proposed Metro box
Proposed Section
M. 0 451 096 955 E. apurvanagpure8@gmail.com