Innovative design-build road maintenance strategy: a proven direction for Kansas City Jim Townsend, AICP Midwest Region Transportation Director Wilson & Company, Inc. Kansas City, Missouri he City of Kansas City has a population of approximately 450,000 people, a quarter of the metropolitan area population. The City maintains approximately 6,200 miles of roadways, with an annual budget of $60 million. Much of the City’s infrastructure is 50 to 100 years old and is in dire need of rehabilitation. Historically, the City would only reconstruct streets if there was a related capacity or geometric improvement project. In 2004, the City established designbuild as an alternative construction delivery method in the City Charter. Between 2004 and 2010, this process was used primarily for buildings. In June 2010, the City of Kansas City’s City Council passed a resolution to fund $33 million for street maintenance and waterline repair/ replacement. There were 12 arterial roadway segments identified in the resolution, each of which was less than one-mile in length identified in the resolution. There had not been any design completed for any of the projects. Within a period of four months, Requests for Proposals (RFPs) had to be submitted, contractors selected and Notices to Proceed issued by the end of 2010. There was a realization that the standard method for project delivery could not accomplish the objective. With this time constraint, a new and innovative process was developed to meet the City Council’s requirements for the procurement and implementation of the projects, incorporating designbuild project delivery.
Program Development Over a four-month period, the City of Kansas City Public Works Department and Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers and Architects (Wilson & Company), worked diligently to develop and administer a program that entailed: •
Establishing RFP and contract documents with the Purchasing Department
•
Defining the scope of work to be completed for each project to meet the desires of two departments: § Public Works Department —Roadway —Traffic/ADA —Sidewalks/ADA § Water Department —Waterline —Sanitary Sewer —Storm Sewer
• Developing the technical requirements for the DesignBuilder and their Designer of Record to adhere to •
Creating a procurement process based on a Best Value project selection including qualifications, experience, technical approach, commitments made and cost evaluations.
Due to the complexities of the projects, and the fact that this was a new process, the City desired to release the projects in two separate
RFP packages. The initial package for the first set of five arterial roadway reconstruction projects was advertised within two months of the designbuild program being conceived. The Design-Builders were allowed to propose on any combination of the individual projects. A best value selection process was used incorporating both technical evaluation and bid cost evaluation of the proposals. It was a single-step process, without short-listing, and without stipend compensations to the proposers. The technical scoring accounted for 60% of the total score and included qualifications and experience, project approach and commitments, maintenance of traffic and project schedule. The bid cost evaluation accounted for 40% of the total score and was determined by a set formula based on the bid price relative to the lowest bid price. Through an expedited process, a mandatory pre-proposal meeting was held to explain the process; proposals were submitted (23 in total), reviewed and scored; selections were made; and recommendations were taken to City Council for an Ordinance to formally issue Notices to Proceed so that work authorization letters could be developed and sent.
Program Refinement As with any new process or program, refinements should be made to address any issues that arise during the initial rollout. In response to this need, a Design-Builder forum was conducted to provide a forum June 2012 APWA Reporter
35
